Month: February 2017

Categories
Columbia Economists Johns Hopkins

Columbia. Professor Henry L. Moore’s Undergraduate and Graduate Transcripts, 1890-96

 

For an earlier post I transcribed the faculty memorial minute for Columbia’s Henry L. Moore along with his request to the department chair in 1924 for a salary adjustment. Today I provide a couple of items that George Stigler had acquired during the course of his research for the paper commissioned by the editors of Econometrica in honor of the Henry L. Moore’s pioneering work in econometrics (Stigler, George J. “Henry L. Moore and Statistical Economics.” Econometrica, vol. 30, no. 1, 1962, pp. 1–21). In addition to some biographical data provided by the alumni office of the Johns Hopkins University, we find the transcripts of both Moore’s undergraduate and graduate courses. One is hardly surprised to see a brilliant undergraduate performance by Moore, though his undergraduate exposure to economics was limited to a single year course in political economy and his undergraduate math courses did not go beyond analytical geometry.

______________________________

 

Carbon Copy of George Stigler’s letter to Johns Hopkins Professor Heberton Evans

 

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
Chicago 37, Illinois

Charles R. Walgreen Foundation for the Study of American Institutions
1126 East 59th Street

June 3, 1959

Professor Heberton Evans Jr.
Department of Political Economy
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland

 

Dear Heb:

Econometrica has asked me to prepare an essay on Henry L. Moore and I have agreed to undertake it because I think he is one of the major figures in American economics in the last half century. He took his Ph.D. from Johns Hopkins in 1896 and I hpe you will be kind enough to see if you cannot obtain for me a copy of the transcript of his record at Johns Hopkins and any other material pertaining to him that may be in the University file.

Cordially,

George J. Stigler

Source: University of Chicago Archives, George Stigler Papers. Box 2, Folder “Moore: Data gathered by correspondence”.

______________________________

 

Letter from Johns Hopkins Alumni Office to George Stigler

 

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
BALTIMORE 18, MARYLAND

Alumni Records Office

June 8, 1959

Professor George J. Stigler
Haskell Hall
University of Chicago
Chicago 37, Illinois

 

Dear Professor Stigler:

Dr. G. Heberton Evans called me this morning and stated that you were interested in having what biographical information we have on Dr. Henry Ludwell Moore, who died on April 28, 1958. He also stated that you wanted a transcript of his work here.

I have talked with the Registrar about a transcript and she has had this looked up for you. Unfortunately in those days—when Dr. Moore was attending Hopkins—the courses were not as clearly outlined as they are now. Miss Davis will have to clarify some of the credits and the courses given and she will send you her findings when she does this. The Registrar’s Office is in quite a whirl at the moment because of Commencement tomorrow and it will probably be some days before Miss Davis can get this information for you.

I am enclosing a sheet giving an obituary which appeared in the Baltimore SUN at the time of Dr. Moore’s death and also a biographical sketch from Who’s Who. For your information I am giving the addresses of his sisters in Baltimore, which I have taken from the telephone directory:

Mrs. R(obert) Maurice Miller, 406 Hawthorne Road, Baltimore 10
Mrs. J(ohn) Talbot Todd, 100 W. University Parkway, Baltimore 10
Mrs. William P. Cole, 100 W. University Parkway, Baltimore 10

Dr. Moore entered Johns Hopkins in 1892 and was a graduate student in Economics through 1896, when he received the Ph.D. degree. His thesis was Von Thünen’s Theory of Natural Wages.

In the President’s Report for 1892-93 mention is made of “The Wage Theory of Von Thünen,” by Dr. Moore, published in abstract in the Johns Hopkins University Circular for May, 1893. Also, in the President’s Report for 1895-96 two papers by Dr. Moore were read discussed in Economic Conferences (a membership of eighteen students who met one evening fortnightly). The titles of these papers are: “The Personality of Professor Carl Menger,” and “Ricardo’s Attack Upon Malthus’s Doctrine of Rent.”

Sincerely yours,
[signed]
Josephine Cole

 

 

[Attachments from Alumni Files]

 

Obituary from the Baltimore Sun

Dr. Henry Moore Dies at Age 89

Dr. Henry Ludwell Moore, Maryland-born retired professor of economics and sociology at Columbia University, died yesterday in a Baltimore hospital after a long illness. He was 89 years old.

He had received his doctorate in 1896 at the Johns Hopkins University and was a former instructor of economics on the Hopkins faculty.

In 1902 he became an associate professor of economics and romance languages at Columbia where he served until his retirement several years ago. He also taught at Smith College.

Son of the late William Hanson and Sophia Moore, Dr. Moore was born at “Moore’s Rest,” the family home in Charles county. He earned his bachelor degree at Randolph-Macon College and then studied at the University of Vienna and the Hopkins.

He was a pioneer of the application of mathematics and statistical methods to economic theory and wrote numerous articles and books in the field.

His wife was the late Mrs. Jane Armstrong Moore.

Surviving him are three sisters, Mrs. R. Maurice Miller, Mrs. J. Talbot Todd and Mrs. William P. Cole, Jr. all of Baltimore.

The funeral will be private.

 

From—WHO’S WHO

Moore, Henry Ludwell, political economist; b. Charles Co., Md., Nov. 21, 1869; s. William Henry and Alice (Burch) M.; B.A., Randolph-Macon Coll., Va. 1892; U. of Vienna, 1894-95; Ph.D., Johns Hopkins, 1896; m. Jane Armstrong Shafer, of Richmond, Va., June 16, 1897. Instr. Johns Hopkins U., 1896-7; prof. polit. economy, Smith Coll., Mass., 1897-02; prof. polit. economy, Columbia U., 1902–*. Author: Laws of Wages, 1911; Economic Cycles, Their Law and Cause, 1914; Forecasting the Yield and the Price of Cotton, 1917; Generating Economic Cycles, 1923; also articles in scientific jours. on the math. and statis. phases of polit. economy. Home: Cornwall, N.Y.

*Dr. Moore retired from Columbia in 1929. The above does not state that Dr. Moore was also Lecturer in Political Economy at Johns Hopkins in 1897-98, during his first year at Smith College.

 

 

We do not know the source of the clipping which gives the following:

The John Marshall prize for the year 1913 has been awarded to Henry Ludwell Moore as a recognition of the value of his work entitled, “Laws of Wages.” The prize, which was established in 1891, consists of a bronze likeness of Chief Justice Marshall, and is given to a graduate of the University who has produced the best work during the preceding year upon some subject in historical or political science.

Source: University of Chicago Archives, George Stigler Papers. Box 2, Folder “Moore: Data gathered by correspondence”.

______________________________

 

Letter from Registrar’s Office of Johns Hopkins to George Stigler

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
BALTIMORE 18, MARYLAND

Office of the Register

April 5, 1960

Professor George J. Stigler

Haskell Hall
University of Chicago
Chicago 37, Illinois

Dear Professor Stigler:

From your letter of March 18, 1960, addressed to Miss Josephine Cole, it appears that I owe you an apology for not taking earlier action upon your request for information on Dr. Henry L. Moore. I am sorry to say that I have neither notes nor recollection of talking about this with Miss Cole last summer. I hope that the enclosed information will reach you in time to be of service.

I think it is in order to say a few words of explanation concerning the academic records of the early years of the University. No effort was made to keep track of a student’s enrollment in individual courses. Grades and points credit were not thought of, and apparently the student had nothing to show except some letters from his professors if he discontinued his studies here before receiving a degree. The final examinations for the degree and the dissertation were recorded, and they were, apparently, considered to be all important.

My source of information, in trying to reconstruct a record of this period, is a publication called “The University Circular”, which listed for each term the seminars and courses of lectures given, and the names of the professors and the students who attended. I thought it would interest you to see the names of the men under whom Dr. Moore studies.

Sincerely yours,

[signed]

Irene M. Davis
Registrar

 

HENRY LUDWELL MOORE
PH.D: 1896
[handwritten: “Johns Hopkins”]

Year Course Instructor
1892-93
(Graduate student)		 Historical Seminary Prof. Adams
Germanic History Prof. Adams
Church History Prof. Adams
English Constitutional Law & History Prof. Emmott
Economic Theory of Distribution Prof. J.B. Clark
Social Science Pres. Gilman
Ethnological History of the Indo-European Peoples Prof. Bloomfield
Methods of Historical Research Dr. Vincent
1893-94
(Graduate student)		 Historical Seminary Prof. Adams
Prussian History Prof. Adams
Railway Problems Prof. H.C. Adams
Administration Prof. W. Wilson
Social Economics Dr. Gould
Theory of Consumption Dr. Sherwood
Recent Economic Literature Dr. Sherwood
Economic Conference Dr. Sherwood
Elements & History of Political Economy Dr. Sherwood
Economic & Social History of Europe Dr. Vincent
1894-95
(Graduate student)		 University of Vienna
1895-96
(Fellow)		 Historical Seminary Prof. Adams
History of the Nineteenth Century Prof. Adams
Economic Conference Dr. Sherwood
Physiocrats Dr. Sherwood
Credit and Money Dr. Sherwood
History of Economic Theories Dr. Hollander
Advanced Economic Elective Dr. Sherwood
Social Economics Prof. Gould
Conditions and Remedies of Non-Employment Prof. Dewey

Source: University of Chicago Archives, George Stigler Papers. Box 2, Folder “Moore: Data gathered by correspondence”.

______________________________

Transcript from Randolph-Macon College

Randolph-Macon College
Ashland, Virginia

June 23, 1959

Henry L. Moore         307 St. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland

1st Report 2nd Report 3rd Report Exam
Term Ending:
Feb. 1890
English 95 98 98 —
Latin 98 97 99 —
German 98 97 97 —
Algebra 100 100 — —
Geometry 100 100
Term Ending:
June 1890
English 99 99 99 —
Latin 99 100 100 —
German 99 98 ½ 98 ½ —
Algebra 97 — — —
Geometry 100 100 99 ½
Term Ending:
Feb. 1891
English 100 99 100 95 ¾
Latin 100 99 100 98.7
Trigonometry 100 100 — —
Physics 96 100 100 100
Anal. Geom. — — 100 98
Pol. Economy 100 99.5 100 —
Term Ending:
June 1891
English 99 100 98 96 ¾
Latin 100 100 100 99.1
Anal. Geom. 100 100 100 99 ¾
Physics 100 100 100 100
Pol. Economy 100 100 — 100
Phys. Culture 100 100 100 —
Elocution — — 100 —
Term Ending:
Feb. 1892
English 100 100 100 99 ½
Latin 100 100 100 99
French 100 99 99 98 ½
Chemistry 99 100 — 98.5
Geology 100 100 — —
Physiology 95 100 100 98
Psychology 100 99 — —
Logic — — 100 —
Phys. Culture 80 — — —
Term Ending:
June 1892
English 99 100 99 98 ¾
Latin 100 100 100 99.3
French 98 93 99 95
Chemistry 100 98 98 99
Geology 100 100 99 —
Astronomy 100 98 100 98.5
Logic 100 99 99 99

 

Source: University of Chicago Archives, George Stigler Papers. Box 2, Folder “Moore: Data gathered by correspondence”.

______________________________

From the Catalogue of Randolph-Macon College for the Collegiate Year 1890-91

POLITICAL ECONOMY
[Taught by Professor of Moral Philosophy and Biblical Literature, John A. Kern D.D.]

This class meets twice a week throughout the session. It is usually taken separately from the other classes of the school, and for satisfactory attainments in it a certificate of distinction is awarded. The study of some question in practical economics is assigned as parallel work. The book used for this purpose last session, is Ely’s “The Labor Movement in America.“

Text-book: F. A. Walker’s Political Economy.

Source: Catalogue of Randolph-Macon College for the Collegiate Year 1890-91: , p. 24.

______________________________

 

Image Source: Cropped from portrait of Moore in Econometrica, Vol. 30, No. 1 (precedes the Stigler article).

 

 

Categories
Columbia Economists Harvard

Harvard and Columbia. The Role of University Presidents in the US. Economist, 1909.

 

 

Today’s post provides a glimpse of the major American universities as seen by the eyes of an Englishman (presumably F. W. H. was both English and a man). While the article highlights the role played by the university presidents, there are other differences noted, e.g. “all-pervading atmosphere of work” observed in the Harvard Law School and the “much greater popularity of politics and political economy”.

For fun I have appended the short-story referred to in the Economist article: “What the College Incubator Did for One Modest Lambkin.” It provides some nice examples of early 20th century American vernacular. Does anyone out there know what the “Harvard walk” looks like?

 

_______________

AMERICAN IMPRESSIONS.—THE UNIVERSITIES AND THEIR PRESIDENTS.

            Although my primary object in visiting America was to get some insight into the commercial and financial system, and to inform myself about the prevalent notions of commercial policy and monetary reform, it was desirable and even indispensable for the objects I had in view to see as much as possible of University men. If the average American university is less powerful than either Oxford or Cambridge as a medium for colouring society, it is perhaps for that reason a stronger element in the national life. The rather exclusive caste with its innumerable degrees that files out of Oxford and Cambridge is but faintly reproduced in the American system by Harvard and Yale, whose mannerisms are sometimes imitated by the youthful universities of the West, and often caricatured by the American humorist. No one who has read it could easily forget George Ade’s description of the grey-haired agriculturist of the Middle West who took his son to a cheap provincial university in the hope that he would “soak up all the knowledge in the market,” and qualify for an inspectorship of schools [George Ade, Breaking into Society (New York: Harper & Brothers,1904), pp. 21-30.]. When the first vacation came, the old man discovered with horror that his young scholar had only acquired the Harvard walk, a passion for athletics, and the habit of large expenditure upon dress. As a matter of fact, universities like Harvard, Yale, Colombia [sic], Cornell, the John Hopkins at Baltimore, and Jefferson’s University of Virginia, have a very high average standard of work. Diligence, as Mr Bryce puts it, is the tradition of the American colleges, partly because “in all but a few universities the vast majority of the students come from simple homes, possess scanty means, and have their way in life to make.” Even at Harvard, with all its rich endowments, its old traditions, and its association with Boston as the home of American men of letters, there is far less of the dilettantism and indifference to the practical business of life than is to be found in the extravagant sets at our fashionable colleges. But this may be partly due to the absence of the college system—a system which has its advantages as well as its defects.

When Professor Lawrence Lowell, who has just been unanimously elected president of Harvard, took me over the law school, I was immensely impressed by the all-pervading atmosphere of work. The ample libraries were filled not only with books, but with students, all engrossed in study, and each apparently convinced that he had not a moment to lose in the race after knowledge. But then, the Harvard law school is justly famous as the largest and best in the English-speaking world. The connection of law with business and of the universities with law is much more close and more real in the states than at home; the chief reason, I think, being the diversity of State legislation upon which all the corporations depend, and the consequent impossibility of carrying on the business of large concerns without constant advice from lawyers. The reliance of business men upon lawyers brings legal firms into far more intimate relations with business conditions than is the case in our own country. Moreover, as there is no distinction between barrister and solicitor, the eminent pleaders and jurists of the United States are not secluded and screened by an intermediate profession from real contact with their real client.

Another evidence of what may be called the actuality of academic life in America is the much greater popularity of politics and political economy. At Harvard, for example, Professor Lowell’s lectures on politics and Professor Taussig’s lectures on economics are regularly attended by three or four hundred students. The large universities have quite a number of economic lecturers, who often specialize on live subjects, such as railways, banking, or industrial corporations. Thus the students are constantly reminded of the various lines of business into which they can enter in order to earn a living after they have taken their degrees.

Lastly, the American university, while it resembles the Scottish or the German more than the English in many respects, differs from all European institutions in the singular importance that it attaches to the office of president. In the words of Mr Bryce, the position is one of honour and influence: “No university dignitaries in Great Britain are so well known to the public, or have their opinions quoted with so much respect, as the heads of the seven or eight leading universities in the United States.” President Eliot, of Harvard, for example, who has just resigned after a long and brilliant career, and Professor Butler, of Colombia[sic], who is still in the prime of life, are two of the most popular orators in the best sense of the word—one should perhaps say popular instructors—in the United States. Most of the presidents of universities are excellent business men, skilled in the arts of advertising their institution, and of attracting students and endowments. When they happen also to be gifted and erudite, their moral and intellectual influence over public opinion is naturally enormous. I was only when I began to realize all this that I could quite understand why the people one met in Boston and New York were often more excited about the presidential election for Harvard than about the Presidential election for the United States. It is probably not generally known that the president-elect, Professor Lowell, whose recently published work on our Constitution is already a classic, has been a successful director of large cotton mills, and is the sole manager of the Lowell Trust. A scholar and a business man with an aptitude for public speaking and liberal views of education should prove an ideal president for Harvard.

F. W. H.

Source: The Economist, January 16, 1909, pp. 105-6.

Image Source:  Abbott Lawrence Lowell, photographic portrait (1904) in Harvard University Archives Photograph Collection: Portraits; The Miriam and Ira D. Wallach Division of Art, Prints and Photographs: Print Collection, The New York Public Library. Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, the new President of Columbia University, New York.

 

_______________

What the College Incubator Did for One Modest Lambkin.

from George Ade, Breaking into Society (New York: Harper & Brothers,1904), pp. 21-30.

ONE Autumn Afternoon a gray-haired Agriculturist took his youngest Olive Branch by the Hand and led him away to a Varsity. Wilbur was 18 and an Onion. He had outgrown his last year’s Tunic, and his Smalls were hardly on speaking terms with his Uppers. He had large, warty Hands, which floated idly at his sides, and his Wrists resembled extra Sets of Knuckles. When he walked, his Legs gave way at the Hinge and he Interfered. On his Head was a little Wideawake with a Buckle at the Side. Mother had bobbed his Hair and rubbed in a little Goose-Grease to make it shine. The Collar that he wore was size 13, and called the Rollo Shape. It rose to a Height of a half-inch above his Neck-Band. For a Cravat he had a Piece of watered Silk Ribbon with Butterflies on it.

Wilbur had his Money tied up in a Handkerchief, and he carried a Paper Telescope loaded down with one Complete Change and a Catalogue of the Institution showing that the Necessary Expenses were not more than $3.40 per Week.

As the Train pulled away from Pewee Junction Wilbur began to Leak. The Salt Tears trickled down through the Archipelago of Freckles. He wanted to Crawfish, but Paw bought him a Box of Crackerjack and told him that if he got an Education and improved his Opportunities some day he might be County Superintendent of Schools and get his $900 a Year just like finding it. So Wilbur spunked up and said he would try to stick it out. He got out the Catalogue and read all of the copper-riveted Rules for the Moral Guidance of Students.

The Curriculum had him scared. He saw that in the next four Years he would have to soak up practically all the Knowledge on the Market. But he was cheered to think that if he persevered and got through he would be entitled to wear an Alpaca Coat and a Lawn Tie and teach in the High-School, so he took Courage and began to notice the Scenery.

Wilbur was planted in a Boarding-House guaranteed to provide Wholesome Food and a Home Influence. Father went back after making a final Discourse on the importance of learning most everything in all of the Books.

Nine Months later they were down at the Depot to meet Wilbur. He had written several times, saying that he could not find time to come Home, as he was in pursuit of Knowledge every Minute of the Day, and if he left the Track, Knowledge might gain several Laps on him. It looked reasonable, too, for the future Superintendent of Schools had spent $400 for Books, $200 for Scientific Apparatus, and something like $60 for Chemicals to be used in the Laboratory.

When the Train suddenly checked itself, to avoid running past the Town, there came out of the Parlor Car something that looked like Fitz, on account of the Padding in the Shoulders. Just above one Ear he wore a dinky Cap about the size of a Postage Stamp. The Coat reached almost to the Hips and was buttoned below. The Trousers had enough material for a suit. They were reefed to show feverish Socks of a zigzag Pattern. The Shoes were very Bull-Doggy, and each had a wide Terrace running around it. Father held on to a Truck for Support. Never before had he seen a genuine Case of the inflammatory Rah-Rahs.

Wilbur was smoking a dizzy little Pipe from which the Smoke curled upward, losing itself in a copious Forelock that moved gently in the Breeze. Instead of a Collar, Wilbur was wearing a Turkish Towel. He had the Harvard Walk down pat. With both Hands in his Pockets, the one who had been pursuing Knowledge teetered towards the Author of his Being and said, ” How are you, Governor?”

Father was always a Lightning Calculator, and as he stood there trying to grasp and comprehend and mentally close in, as it were, on the Burlap Suit and the Coon Shirt and the sassy Pipe, something told him that Wilbur would have to Switch if he expected to be County Superintendent of Schools,

“Here are my Checks,” said Wilbur, handing over the Brasses.” Have my Trunks, my Golf Clubs, my portable Punching-Bag, the Suit-Case and Hat-Boxes sent up to the House right away. Then drive me Home by the Outside Road, because I don’t want to meet all these Yaps. They annoy me.”

“You’d better git out of that Rig mighty quick if you don’t want to be Joshed,” said his Parent. “Folks around here won’t stand for any such fool Regalia, and if you walk like a frozen-toed Hen you’ll get some Hot Shots or I miss my Calkilations.”

“Say, Popsy, I’ve been eating Raw Meat and drinking Blood at the Training-Table, and I’m on Edge,” said Wilbur, expanding his Chest until it bulged out like a Thornton Squash.” If any of these local Georgie Glues try to shoot their Pink Conversation at me I’ll toss them up into the Trees and let them hang there. I’m the Gazabe that Puts the Shot. Any one who can trim a Policeman and chuck a Hackman right back into his own Hack and drive off with him doesn’t ask for any sweeter Tapioca than one of these Gaffer Greens. The Ploughboy who is muscle- bound and full of Pastry will have a Proud Chance any time that he struts across my Pathway. In my Trunks I have eight suits a little warmer than this one and 47 pairs of passionate Hose. I’m out here to give the Cornfields a Touch of High Life. It’s about time that your Chaws had a Glimpse of the Great Outside World. Any one who gets Fussy about the Color-Combinations that I spring from Day to Day will be chopped up and served for Lunch. To begin with, I’m going to teach you and Mother to play Golf. If these Mutts come and lean over the Fence and start to get off their Colored- Weekly Jokes we’ll fan the Hill-side with them.”

“What do they teach up at your School — besides Murder?” inquired Father. ” I thought you wanted to be County Superintendent of Schools.”

“I’ve outgrown all those two-by-four Ambitions,” was the Reply. “I’m going to be on the Eleven next Fall. What more could you ask?”

That very week Wilbur organized a Ball Team that walloped Hickory Crick, Sand Ridge, and Sozzinsville. He had the whole Township with him. Every Cub at Pewee Junction began to wear a Turkish Towel for a Collar and practise the Harvard Walk.

MORAL : A Boy never blossoms into his full Possibilities until he strikes an Atmosphere of Culture.

Categories
Economists Fields Harvard

Harvard. Five Economics Ph.D. examinees, 1907-08

 

This posting lists the five graduate students in economics who took their subject examinations for the Ph.D. at Harvard from March 12 through May 21, 1908. The examination committee members, academic history, general and specific subjects are provided along with the doctoral thesis subject, when declared. Lists for 1903-04, 1904-05, 1905-06, 1915-16, and 1926-27 were posted previously. In the same archival box one finds lists for the academic years 1902-03 through 1904-05, 1906-07 through 1913-14, 1915-16, 1917-18 through 1918-19, and finally 1926-27. I only include graduate students of economics (i.e. not included are the Ph.D. candidates in history and government).

Titles and dates of Harvard economic dissertations for the period 1875-1926 can be found here.

______________________

DIVISION OF HISTORY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE
EXAMINATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF PH.D.

1907-08

Walter Wallace McLaren.

Special Examination in Economics, Thursday, March 12, 1908.
General Examination passed April 10, 1907.
Committee: Professors Taussig (chairman), McLean (University of Toronto), Gay, Bullock and Munro.
Academic History: Queen’s University (Canada), 1894-99; Queen’s University Theological College, 1899-1902; Harvard Graduate School, 1905-08; A.M. (Queen’s Univ.) 1899; B:D. (ibid) 1902.
Special Subject: Canadian Economic History.
Thesis Subject: “History of the Canadian Tariff.” (With Professor Taussig.)
Committee on Thesis: Professors Taussig, Gay, Munro. 

Edmund Thornton Miller.

General Examination in Economics, Wednesday, May 6, 1908.
Committee: Professors Bullock (chairman), Taussig, Hart, Ripley, Gay, and Andrew.
Academic History: University of Texas, 1897-1901; Harvard Graduate School, 1902-03, 1907-08; A.B. (University of Texas) 1900; A.M. (ibid) 1901; A.M. (Harvard) 1903.
General Subjects: 1. Economic Theory and its History. 2. Economic History to 1750. 3. Economic History since 1750. 4. Money, Banking and Transportation. 5. Public Finance and Financial History. 6. History of American Institutions.
Special Subject: Public Finance and the Financial History of the United States since 1789.
Thesis Subject: “The Financial History of Texas.” (With Professor Bullock.)

Melvin Thomas Copeland.

General Examination in Economics, Wednesday, May 13, 1908.
Committee: Professors Gay (chairman), Taussig, Carver, Hart, Ripley, and Andrew.
Academic History: Bowdoin College, 1902-06; Harvard Graduate School, 1906-08; A.B. (Bowdoin) 1906; A.M. (Harvard) 1907.
General Subjects: 1. Economic Theory and its History. 2. Economic History since 1750. 3. Sociology and Social Reform. 4. Statistics. 5. Transportation and Foreign Commerce. 6. History of American Institutions.
Special Subject: Economic History of the United States.
Thesis Subject: “Cotton Manufacturing in the United States since 1860.” (With Professor Taussig.)

Frank Richardson Mason.

Special Examination in Economics, Thursday, May 14, 1908.
General Examination passed May 8, 1907.
Committee: Professors Taussig (chairman), Carver, Gay, Bullock and Andrew.
Academic History: Harvard College, 1901-05; Harvard Graduate School, 1905-07; A.B. (Harvard) 1905; A.M. (ibid) 1906.
Special Subject: Economic History of the United States.
Thesis Subject: “The Silk Industry in America..” (With Professor Taussig.)
Committee on Thesis: Professors Taussig, Carver, and Gay.

Robert Franz Foerster.

General Examination in Economics, Thursday, May 21, 1908.
Committee: Professors Taussig (chairman), Royce, Carver, Ripley, Gay, and Bullock.
Academic History: Harvard College, 1902-05; University of Berlin, 1905-06; A.B. (Harvard) 1906.
General Subjects: 1. Economic Theory and its History. 2. Economic History since 1750. 3. Sociology and Social Reform. 4. Statistics. 5. Labor Problems and Industrial Organization. 6. Philosophy.
Special Subject: Labor Problems.
Thesis Subject: “Emigration from Italy, with special reference to the United States.” (With Professor Taussig.)

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examinations for the Ph.D. (HUC 7000.70), Folder “Examinations for the Ph.D., 1907-1908”.

Image Source: Memorial Hall, ca. 1900. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540.

 

Categories
Courses Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Junior Year Theory of Production and Distribution of National Income. Haberler and Leontief, 1942.

 

 

The last time Economics 1 was offered as a year course (1939-40), it was taught by Professor Chamberlin, Associate Professor Leontief and Instructor O.H. Taylor. Starting in the academic year 1940-41, Economics 1 was split into the two semester courses Economics 1a (Chamberlin: Economic Theory) and 1b (O.H.Taylor: Intellectual Background of Economic Thought). Two years later, 1941-42, the second semester course 1b was taught by Professor Haberler and Associate Professor Leontief under the title “Theory of Production and Distribution of the National Income”. In 1942-43, Economics 1b as “Theory of Production and Distribution of the National Income” was taught a last time by Professor Leontief and Dr. Monroe.

Here is a recently added link to the final examination questions for the 1941-42 course taught by Haberler and Leontief.

__________________________

Course enrollment

*1b 2hf. Professor Haberler and Associate Professor Leontief.–Theory of Production and Distribution of National Income.

Total 27: 2 Seniors, 22 Juniors, 3 Sophomores.

Source: Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments for 1941-42, p. 62.

__________________________

Economics 1b
1941-42

 

  1. Theory of Wages
  2. Theory of Capital and Interest
    1. Capital goods as factors of production. Stock vs. flow concepts. Durable and non-durable goods. Money capital and the rate of interest. Demand for capital by an individual firm.
    2. Time preference. Propensity to save.
    3. Interrelation of production and consumption goods industries. General equilibrium. national Income, Saving, and Investment.
  1. Theory of Profits
  1. Introduction to Welfare Economics

Modern theory of utility. Individual vs. social utility. Distribution of national income. Private vs. social marginal product.

 

Readings in: (Specific chapter and page of assignments will be given later.)

Paul Douglas, The Theory of Wages.
Meade and Hitch, An Introduction to Economic Analysis.
Böhm-Bawerk, Positive Theory of Capital.
J. B. Clark, The Distribution of Wealth.
Irving Fisher, The Theory of Interest (1930).
J. M. Keynes. General Theory of Interest and Unemployment.
K. Wicksell, Lectures on Political Economy. [Volume I; Volume II]
Pigou, Economics of Welfare.
Triffin, Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium Theory.

Articles by Frank Knight in the Journal of Political Economy and by A. Lerner in the Economic Journal.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. (HUC 8522.2.1) Box 3, Folder “Economics, 1941-1942”.

Image Source:  Harvard Class Album 1942.

 

Categories
Courses Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Junior Year Economic Theory, Chamberlin. 1940

 

 

The last time the undergraduate course Economics 1 (Economic Theory) was offered as a full year course (1939-40), it was taught as an honors course by Professor Edward Chamberlin, Associate Professor Wassily Leontief and Instructor O.H. Taylor. Starting in the academic year 1940-41, Harvard’s Economics 1 was split into back-to-back semester courses Economics 1a (Chamberlin: Economic Theory) and 1b (Taylor: The Intellectual Background of Economic Thought). Two years later the second semester course 1b was taught by Professor Haberler and Associate Professor Leontief under the title “Theory of Production and Distribution of the National Income” (1941-42).

________________________________

Course Enrollment

*1a 1hf. Professor Chamberlin.—Economic Theory.

Total 63: 1 Senior, 56 Juniors, 6 Sophomores.

 

Source: Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments for 1940-1941, p. 58.

________________________________

ECONOMICS 1a
1940-41
Revised Outline

  1. The Law of Supply and Demand. Meaning and Generality. Relation to the Law of Cost. Cost curves and supply curves. Relation to monopoly and to competition. Pure and perfect competition. Market problem illustrating deviations from “equilibrium” as defined by perfect competition. Equilibrium vs. the equation of supply and demand.

Mill—Principles, Book III, chapters 2, 3, 5.
Chamberlin—Monopolistic Competition, chapters 1, 2.
Henderson—Supply and Demand, chapters 1,2.
Marshall—Principles, pp. 348-350; p. 806 note.

  1. Competitive theory, illustrated by Marshall.

Marshall—Principles, Book V, chapters 1-5; book IV, chapter 13; Book V, chapters 8, 9, 10, 12.

  1. The effect of small numbers in the market.

Monopolistic Competition, Chapter 3.

  1. Product differentiation. Co-existence and blending of monopoly and competition. Output (sales) as a function of price, “product” and selling outlays. Price-quantity relationships examined in some detail, selling costs and products as variables more briefly.

Monopolistic Competition, chapters 4, 5, 6, 7 (pp. 130-149), Appendices C, D, E.
Alsberg, C. L.—“Economic Aspects of Adulteration and Imitation,” Q.J.E., Vol. 46, p. 1 (1931).

  1. Production and Distribution. Diminishing returns. Diminishing marginal productivitiy. The laws of cost. General effect of monopoly elements on the analysis.

Garver & Hansen—Principles, chapter 5.
Viner, J.—“Cost Curves and Supply Curves,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 1931.
Monopolistic Competition, Appendix B.

  1. Theory of Wages.

Hicks, J. R.—Theory of Wages, chapters 6, 7.

  1. Profits.

Henderson, Supply and Demand, Ch. 7.

________________________________

ECONOMICS 1a
1940-41

  1. The Law of Supply and Demand. Meaning and Generality. Relation to the Law of Cost. Cost curves and supply curves. Relation to monopoly and to competition. Pure and perfect competition. Market problem illustrating deviations from “equilibrium” as defined by perfect competition. Equilibrium vs. the equation of supply and demand.

Mill—Principles, Book III, chapters 2, 3, 5.
Chamberlin—Monopolistic Competition, chapters 1, 2.
Henderson—Supply and Demand, chapters 1,2.
Marshall—Principles, pp. 348-350; p. 806 note.

  1. Competitive theory, illustrated by Marshall.

Marshall—Principles, Book V, chapters 1-5; book IV, chapter 13; Book V, chapters 8, 9, 10, 12.

  1. The effect of small numbers in the market.

Monopolistic Competition, Chapter 3.

  1. Product differentiation. Co-existence and blending of monopoly and competition. Output (sales) as a function of price, “product” and selling outlays. Price-quantity relationships examined in some detail, selling costs and products as variables more briefly.

Monopolistic Competition, chapters 4, 5, 6, 7 (pp. 130-149), Appendices C, D, E.
Alsberg, C. L.—“Economic Aspects of Adulteration and Imitation,” Q.J.E., Vol. 46, p. 1 (1931).

  1. Production and Distribution. Diminishing returns. Diminishing marginal productivitiy. The laws of cost. General effect of monopoly elements on the analysis.

Garver & Hansen—Principles, chapter 5.
Viner, J.—“Cost Curves and Supply Curves,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 1931.
Monopolistic Competition, Appendix B.

  1. Theory of Wages.

Hicks, J. R.—Theory of Wages, chapters 6, 7.

  1. Theory of Capital and Interest.

Clark, J. B., The Distribution of Wealth, Chapters 9 and 10.
Böhm-Bawerk, The Positive Theory of Capital, Book II, Chs. 2 and 5, Book V.

  1. Profits.

Marshall, Book VI, Ch. 5, section 7; Chs. 7, 8.
Taussig, Principles, Vol. II, Ch. 50, section 1.
Henderson, Supply and Demand, Ch. 7.
Berle and Means, The Modern Corporation, Book IV.
Chamberlin, Monopolistic Competition, Ch. 5, section 6; Ch. 7, section 6; Appendices D, E; Ch. 8.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. (HUC 8522.2.1) Box 2, Folder “Economics, 1940-1941”.

Image Source: Harvard Class Album 1946.

Categories
Chicago Exam Questions

Chicago. Exams for Introduction to Money and Banking, A. G. Hart, 1932-35

 

 

In an earlier post I provided the course outline and readings for the first money and banking courses taught by Albert Gailord Hart during the depths of the Great Depression. Today’s post provides transcriptions of the final examination questions for the course. Interesting to note that the course final exam was spread over two days in 1934 and 1935.

 

_______________________________

Course description

[Economics] 230. Introduction to Money and Banking.—The material in the course includes a study of the factors which determine the value of money in the short and in the long run; the problem of index numbers of price levels; and the operation of the commercial banking system and its relation to the price level and general business activity. Prerequisite: Social Science I and II or equivalent.

Source: University of Chicago, Announcements [for 1933-34], Arts, Literature and Science, vol. 33, no. 8 (March 25, 1933), p. 266.

_______________________________

Econ 230
A. G. Hart

FINAL EXAMINATION, DECEMBER 21, 1932

Answer questions I, II and III.

I. (About 20 minutes).

Suppose a large manufacturing firm wants more capital. It might establish a bank with $1,000,000 capital paid in in cash and $1,000,000 in deposits transferred from other banks. Apart from legal restrictions on the amount a bank may lend to a single borrower, could the manufacturing firm borrow $20,000,000 from the bank (reckoning 10% reserve)? If not, how much could be obtained from such a bank? Explain.

II. Answer all four parts, allowing about ten minutes for each:

a) Explain the difference between a sight draft and a cable draft in foreign exchange. Which includes an interest charge? Why?

b) Suppose demand depositors of the First National Bank of Chicago transferred $1,000,000 from demand to time deposits. What would be the change in the amount of reserve deposits which the First National is required to hold at the Federal Reserve? What would be the change in required reserve brought about by a similar shift of deposits in a state bank, member of the Federal Reserve System, in Cleveland, Ohio?

c) Explain what is meant by open market operations. How do they affect the money market?

d) Define Mr. Hawtrey’s concepts of “consumers’ outlay” and “unspent margin”. How do they figure in Mr. Hawtrey’s theory of the price level?

III. Answer any two parts, allowing about twenty minutes for each:

a) Explain the difference between the price level defined by the Fisher form of the quantity equation and a cost-of-living index for the working class. What might cause these two price levels to behave differently?

b) If counterfeiters succeeded in making perfect reproductions of Federal Reserve Notes and placed $100,000,000 in circulation, how would this differ from 1) an expansion of $100,000,000 in bank loans, 2) an extra $100,000,000 in greenbacks used by the government to pay unemployment relief in the following respects: i) effect on prices; ii) effect on the total volume of production and employment; iii) effect on the direction of production; iv) “forced saving”? Give reasons.

c) If citizens of a country increase their investments abroad, what influence will this have 1) on the price of sight bills on a foreign country; 2) on the balance of trade; 3) on the prices of domestic goods in the first country? Why?

d) What is the basis of distinction between “real” and “monetary” theories of the business cycle? Mention and criticise an example of each type.

_______________________________

Econ 230
A.G. Hart

Hour Examination, August 3, 1933

 

Answer questions I, II, and III

  1. Bank Statement:

The following items make up the condensed statement of one of the great New York banks for two recent call dates (to nearest $1000):

Item June 30, 1931 June 30, 1933
(000 omitted)
1. Stock of Federal Reserve Bank
2. Undivided Profits
3. U. S. Government securities
4. Other bonds and securities
5. Dividend payable July 1
6. Customers’ acceptance liability
7. Capital
8. Acceptances
9. Real estate
10. Reserve for contingencies
11. Deposits
12. Cash and due from banks
13. Surplus
14. Other assets
15. Other liabilities
16. Loans and discounts
17. Total resources
18. Total liabilities		 $8,880
25,581
281,786
174,500
7,400
169,255
148,000
174,252
35,036
14,720
1,897,544
531,352
148,000
3,030
80,828
1,295,486
2,499,325
2,499,325		 $8,160
8,705
207,955
246,845
2,590
91,443
148,000
93,354
32,069
3,334
1,408,337
351,374
50,000
15,466
18,747
779,755
1,733,067
1,733,067

A. Reconstruct the statement, separating assets from liabilities.
B. Which of the above items represent the investment of stockholders in the back? Do you think the total of these items bears a normal relation to total resources?
C. Does any of the above items show the bank’s primary reserves? If not, try to estimate their amount. Compare primary reserves with deposits. Do you think the proportion shows the bank to be healthy? Explain.
D. Which of the asset items consist wholly or in part of “secondary reserves”?
E. What items would replace #12 in a more detailed statement?
F. Suggest explanations for the decrease between 1931 and 1933 in items 11, 8, 5, 16, and 13.

 

  1. Federal Reserve:

A. What is the “open market committee”?
B. List three of the more important powers of the Federal Reserve Board over the Federal Reserve Banks.
C. Name five cities having Federal Reserve Banks

 

  1. Quantity Theory

It is the announced policy of the Roosevelt administration to spend about $3,000,000,000 within the next year on public works, raising the funds by borrowing from the Federal Reserve and member banks. In what sense is this “inflation”? Assuming no inflationary or deflationary actio from other sources, how much might this program be expected to raise the “general price level” in the long run? Explain.

 

_______________________________

FINAL EXAMINATION
Economics 230
Summer Quarter 1933

(follow link above)

_______________________________

 

FINAL EXAMINATION
Economics 230
Winter Quarter 1933

I
(About 30 minutes)

The following was the consolidated statement of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks for March 1, 1933 in abbreviated form:

Item March 1 Feb. 21, 1933
(000 omitted)
1. Total gold reserves
2. Total Reserves
3. Discounts secured by U.S. obligations
4. Other discounts
5. Total bills discounted
6. U. S. securities
7. Total bills bought
8. Federal Reserve notes in circulation
9. Total deposits
10. Reserve ratio against notes and deposits		 $2,892,083
3,066,537
418,921
293,470
712,391
1,835,963
383,666
3,579,522
2,157,190
53.5%		 $3,118,393
3,304,644
105,102
222,036
327,138
1,834,233
179,576
3,000,248
2,399,398
61.2%

Answer parts a) to d): a) Which of the above are asset items in which liabilities? What items are missing which would appear the complete statement? b) What makes up the difference between items 1 and 2 from March 1? c) Explain the changes in items 1, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in terms of the conditions of the week covered, paying special attention to interrelations of the changes. d) Calculate free gold under the regular rules and under the Glass-Steagall Act (assuming notes issued not in circulation to be $100,000,000), as of March 1.

 

II

Answer all three parts, allowing about ten minutes for each:

a) Explain what is meant by open-market operations by the Federal Reserve Banks. Under whose authority are they conducted? What is their effect on the money market?

b) Explain the method of calculating “net demand deposits” for working out the required reserves of member banks.

c) Write out the Fisher equation of exchange and define the meaning of the symbols used. (Criticism or discussion not called for.)

 

III

Answer any two parts, allowing about twenty minutes for each:

a) Distinguish between “real” and “Monetary” theories of the business cycle. Mention and criticise an example of each.

b) Discuss: “The very process of financing increased production puts into circulation enough money to buy the added output, so that supply and demand must be equal. After all… trade is but a perfected system of barter.”

c) “In these days of serious world-wide maladjustments the importance of economic stability is likely to be over – rather than underrated.” Discuss.

d) Indicate the advantages and shortcomings of the quantity theory of money 1) for short-run analysis, 2) for predicting long-period tendencies.

_______________________________

 

ECONOMICS 230
Final Examination, Mch. 22-23 [1934]

Part I – answer questions 1 – 3 and either 4 or 5

  1. If the Federal Reserve wishes to diminish the reserves of the member banks, what can it do? Can anything happen to make these measures ineffective? If so, what?
  2. What is a letter of credit?
  3. What differences in meaning are there between the price level of Keynes’s first equation and that of Fisher’s equation?
  4. M. (100%) Nichols, of the First National Bank of Englewood, recently wrote to the R.F.C.: “when I believe that our merchants can safely and profitably borrow money, with a reasonable assurance of paying it back, I shall tell them so… I refuse to take this responsibility as I do not believe this is a safe time either to borrow or to loan.” Discuss this in relation to the government’s claim that refusal to expand bank loans is retarded recovery.
  5. It has been said that the effects of inflation are primarily on the distribution of wealth, those of deflation on its production. Discuss.

 

Part II – Answer questions 6-8 and either 9 or 10.

  1. Distinguish between F. R. Notes and F. R. Bank notes.
  2. Explain the meaning of “velocity of circulation”.
  3. Would the following tend to raise or lower the prices of foreign-currency units in dollars: a) increased demand for sugar in this country? b) an increase in our tariff duties on English textiles? c) resumption of payments to our government on account of war debts? d) the rise of wage rates in this country brought about by NRA? Explain briefly in each case.
  4. Do you think that the Roosevelt monetary policy will succeed in raising prices appreciably? Why and How? If you do, what do you think will be its effect on the following price relationships. Salaries vs. cost-of-living? Wages vs. cost-of-living? Farm prices for crops vs. prices of things farmers buy? Explain.
  5. Which of the following groups have most to gain by inflation and which least: policeman? Owners of mortgaged down-town real estate? Exporters? Railway bondholders? Railway stockholders? Wage earners? Unemployed steelworkers? Explain in each case, and if you cannot tell whether the group would gain, explain why you cannot.

_______________________________

Econ. 230
A. G. Hart

Final Examination
December 19-20, 1935

  1. Gold imports into the United States in the 22 months ending October 31, 1935 totaled nearly $2473 million (new valuation), increasing our monetary gold stocks by about one third. a) Suggest explanations for the movement. b) Estimate the effects of the inflow of total reserves of member banks; on their excess reserves. Explain your reasoning. c) Estimate the effects of the inflow on total reserves and on excess reserves of the Federal Reserve Banks, and explain.
  2. If American monetary policy brings about a substantial rise of prices within the next five years, how will this affect the interests of a) a widow with an annuity from a life insurance company; b) a railway engineer; c) a university professor; d) an unemployed carpenter; e) a postal clerk; f) an automobile mechanic. Give grounds for your answers.

 

 

  1. State and criticise the views of Gregory on the merits of the American devaluation from an international standpoint.
  2. Describes a means by which the American monetary authorities could act to stabilise: a) the dollar price of a foreign gold-standard currency, b) the volume of checking deposits in the hands of the public, c) an index number of wholesale prices. In each case what reasons are there for doubting the effectiveness of these means?
  3. (Optional – write only if time permits.) As among the three sorts of “stabilisation” mentioned, which would you prefer to see made the guide of monetary policy, and why?

 

Source: Columbia University Archives. Albert Gaylord Hart Papers. Box 61, Folder “Assignments and Other Memoranda for Reserve in Harper Reading Room Econ 230, A. G. Hart”.

Image source: Ibid.

 

 

Categories
Bibliography Harvard Suggested Reading

Harvard. Theories of Rent Readings Lists. Taussig, Schumpeter, Alan Sweezy. 1934

 

 

One page containing the course bibliographies for the topics “Urban Rent” and “Broader Aspects of Rent” from Economics 7b, Theories of Value and Distribution, jointly offered by Frank W. Taussig, Joseph A. Schumpeter and Alan R. Sweezy was found in the collection of course syllabi and reading lists in the Harvard Archives. One would have expected that there would have been separate bibliographies prepared for “Wages”, “Profits” and possibly “Interest” for this course on distribution. I find it less likely that the course was a single “topics” course that happened to be focused on “Rent” for the semester. This was confirmed after looking at the final examination questions for the course. 

Note: Alan’s brother Paul did not receive his Ph.D. until 1937 and Alan was given a three-year appointment at the rank of “faculty instructor” beginning in the Fall of 1934 following his previous year as “graduate instructor”. Hence “Dr. Sweezy” clearly refers to Alan. I have appended a 1955 article from the Harvard Crimson about the famous Sweezy-Walsh case for those who might not be familiar with that episode in the history of tenure review procedures.

 

__________________________

 

*Economics 7b 1hf. Theories of Value and Distribution
[from Course Announcement]

Half-course (first half-year). Tu., Th., at 2, and a third hour at the pleasure of the instructors. Professors Taussig and Schumpeter, and Dr. Sweezy.

 

Source: Harvard University. Announcement of the Courses of Instruction offered by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences during 1934-35 (2nd ed). Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. XXXI, No. 38 (September 20, 1934), p. 126

__________________________

Course Enrollment

*7b 1hf. Professors Taussig and Schumpeter, and Dr. Sweezy.—Theories of Value and Distribution.

Total 23: 14 Seniors, 4 Juniors, 1 Sophomore, 5 Others.

 

Source: Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments for 1934-1935, p. 81.

__________________________

 

Economics 7b

1934-35 [pencil note]

Urban Rent

E.H. Chamberlin, Monopolistic Competition, appen. D, pp. 200-203
W. C. Clark & J. L. Kingston, The Skyscraper: A Study of the Economic Heighth of Modern Office Buildings, esp. ch. 2, 3, and conclusion.
H. B. Dorau & A. G. Hinman, Urban Land Economics, pp. 158-223. Characteristics of Urban Land. Part V Urban Land Income and Value. (Note: The whole of the book is relevant, but much of it can be skipped over superficially for the problem in hand.)
H. J. Davenport, Economics of Enterprise, ch. 13.
R. M. Haig, “Toward and Understanding of the Metropolis”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, February and May 1926
R. M. Hurd, Principle of City Land Values, especially ch. 6.
F. W. Taussig, Principles, vol. 2, ch. 43.
R. T. Ely, Outlines of Economics, 5th ed., ch. 22.

 

Broader Aspects of Rent

J. B. Clark, either Distribution of Wealth, ch. 13, or “Distribution as Determined by a Law of Rent”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 5, 1890-91
F. A. Fetter, “The Passing of the Old Concept of Rent”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 15, 1900-01.
A. S. Johnson, “Rent in Modern Economic Theory”, American Economic Association Publications, 3rd. series, vol. 3(1902).
A. E. Monroe, Value and Income, pp. 65-67, 188-194.
Joan Robinson, Economics of Imperfect Competition, Bk. III, ch. 8, pp. 102-116

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003 (HUC 8522.2.1), Box 2, Folder “Economics, 1934-1935”.

Image Sources:  Harvard Class Album.  Taussig (1934), Schumpeter (1939), Alan Sweezy (1929).

 

__________________________

The Sweezy-Walsh Case

Harvard Crimson
January 12, 1955

In a letter elsewhere on the page, Dean Bender rightly points out that the CRIMSON has inadvertently perpetuated an untruth we have long tried to bury. Alan R. Sweezy ’29, it is true, was given a “terminating appointment,” and it was no secret that his views were to the left of most political centers. By working solely from these two facts, some liberals on the Faculty and elsewhere came to a conclusion which was long to prove embarrassing to President Conant. More important, the dropping of Sweezy and the other instructor in the case, J. Raymond Walsh, forced a reform in the University’s appointment system in one of the few instances that the Harvard Faculty has rebelled against its Administration.

Both Sweezy and Walsh were popular and able teachers in the Economics department. Both men held three-year appointments as instructors and when this period was up, In 1937, the Department strongly recommended that both men be retained. When they were not rehired, and when the Administration released a statement that its decision was reached solely on the grounds of “teaching capacity and scholarly ability,” charges accusing the University of various infringements were raised from coast to coast.

The CRIMSON immediately editorialized that, though the University’s statement was “ill-timed and impolitic,” the political views of the two men had nothing to do with the case. By that time, however, alarmists and those Communists who capitalize on such misunderstandings were off and running, joined by friends of the two men who were genuinely confused by the Administration’s actions.

Within a few weeks, the cry about their hue forced Conant to make a special report to the Overseers. The President, who at that time did not enjoy the complete confidence of the Faculty he was later accorded, held fast, arguing that the University cannot appoint a man just because his views are unorthodox. “If academic decisions are to be influenced by the fear of their being misinterpreted as interference with academic freedom,” Conant said, “then academic freedom itself, to my mind disappears.” The New York Herald-Tribune hailed Conant and his stand, describing his as a man “tolerant of everything except intolerance.”

Since even the two principals were now convinced that their politics were not the issue, the outburst began to quiet. But the Faculty, while willing to forgive, could not forget. One hundred and thirty-one of the nonpermanent teaching staff requested an entire investigation of the tenure system. Even if the financial pressures of the depression made it impossible for Conant to keep men like Sweezy, these teachers did not feel that the current methods of selecting permanent appointees were as accurate and well-defined as they might be.

It was significant, and extraordinary, that the appeal for a re-evaluation was not made to Conant but to a committee of eight respected professors including Ralph Barton Perry, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Samuel E. Morison, and Felix Frankfurter. These men wrote to Conant, suggesting what they wanted to study and making it pointedly clear that if they were not authorized to investigate, they would do so anyway.

Two separate reports were issued by this committee, one on Walsh and Sweezy, the second on the entire tenure question. The first recommendation–that the two instructors be re-appointed–was vetoed by the Corporation. The Faculty accepted this action without much comment; by that time, the second report was the chief interest among professors. Published in March, 1939, the report recommended a mathematical evaluation of departments, their concentrators and staffs, with more rigid rules about how often permanent additions could be made to the Faculty.

Conant substantially accepted this report and it was forwarded to the full Faculty and the Corporation which also agreed to its principles. The many complications were referred to the new Assistant Deans of the Faculty, W. C. Graustein and Paul H. Buck. Before his tragic death in an accident, Graustein had worked carefully on the plan and it came to bear his name. Dean of the Faculty Ferguson, who had agreed to hold an Administrative post only during this stormy interim period, soon resigned his position. With the promotion of Paul Buck to the job, the Walsh-Sweezy affair became history and Conant found that he had made his most successful appointment to the Deanship.

 

Categories
Courses Economists Fields Harvard

Harvard. Edward Chamberlin Lobbies to Teach a Graduate Theory Course. 1935

 

 

With the retirements of Charles J. Bullock and Frank W. Taussig in 1935 Edward H. Chamberlin saw his opportunity to start to break out of his designated field box “government and industry” and into “theory”. We have here a letter that Chamberlin wrote to the head of the economics department, Harold H. Burbank. The letter is of the putting-this-conversation-into-the-written-record variety. His deference to Burbank and recognition of the established claims of other colleagues to the theory field are complemented with a dash of false-modesty—“Perhaps I may, however,…put in my own ‘claim’ (if such it may be called) for whatever consideration it deserves.”

In any event, from the subsequent shuffle in instructional assignments for the 1935-36 academic year, we see that Chamberlin succeeded in joining Schumpeter and Leontief at the Harvard theory table.

________________________

Letter from Associate Professor Chamberlin to Chairman Burbank
Requesting to teach a graduate course in theory

 

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

14 Ash Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts
February 26, 1935

Professor H. H. Burbank, Chairman
Department of Economics,
Harvard University,
Cambridge, Mass.

 

Dear Burby:

This is to confirm our conversation of the other day. I should like to ask if arrangements could possibly be made at this late date for me to give a graduate half course next year on “Contemporary Value Theory.”

I have been asked by several people recently why it was that, although the theoretical problems which Mrs. Robinson and myself have raised are the subject of lively controversies in numerous other universities, one finds them very much in the background at Harvard. There does seem to be a general interest in the subject, and, since I have a strong continuing interest in it myself, the occasion seems to present itself of offering to graduate students at Harvard a better opportunity than they now have to study and discuss this set of problems and others related to it.

I realize that others than myself have claims to theory courses and that the problems of fitting the members of the Department to courses are not easy. Perhaps I may, however, even for this very reason, put in my own “claim” (if such it may be called) for whatever consideration it deserves. My work in Public Utilities and Industrial Organization could be reduced without difficulty. Donald Wallace could take my part in Economics 49 with Professors Crum and Mason, and, I am sure, would do an excellent job of it. This arrangement, together with a slight reduction in my tutorial load, would give me the time for another half course and I should continue in the undergraduate 4a and 4c. I should have, even then, only one-fifth of my time in theory, the other four fifths in the practical field of government and industry.

You have recently intimated in conversation that I might soon be given a share of the work in theory. I hope it may be next year, and also that a way can be found to arrange for it without interfering with the work which others are now doing or plan to do in the field.

Sincerely yours,
[signed]
Edward H. Chamberlin

________________________

Copy of letter from Chairman Burbank to Dean Murdock
with changes to 1935-36 course announcements

April 17, 1935

Dear Dean Murdock,

Owing to the retirement of Professor Taussig, several changes in the Course Announcement for the coming year will have to be made. The Department recommends the following:

*Economics 7b1. Theories of Value and Distribution. [listed as “Modern Economic Thought” in Report of the President of Harvard College 1935-36, p. 82; ]

Half-course (first half-year). Mon., Wed., and (at the pleasure of the instructor) Fri., at 11. Associate Professor Chamberlin.
[Replacing Taussig, Schumpeter and Sweezy who taught in 1934-35]

Economics 8a2. Introduction to the Mathematical Treatment of Economics.

Half-course (second half-year). Mon., 4-5. Asst. Professor Leontief.
[Replacing Schumpeter who taught in 1934-35]

Economics 11. Economic Theory.

Mon., Wed., Fri., at 2. Professor Schumpeter.
[Replacing Taussig and Schumpeter who taught in 1934-35]

Economics 14b2. History of Economic Thought since 1776.

Half-course (second half-year). Mon., Wed., Fri., at 11. Dr. Monroe.
[Replacing “History and Literature of Economics from the Physiocrats through Ricardo” taught by Professor Bullock in 1934-35. Bullock retired from Harvard September 1, 1935.]

Sincerely yours,

H. H. Burbank

Dean Kenneth B. Murdock
20 University Hall

 

 

Source: Harvard University Archives, Department of Economics, Correspondence & Papers 1902-1950. Box 23, Folder “Course offerings 1926-1937”.

Image Source: Harvard Class Album, 1939.

Categories
Courses Suggested Reading Syllabus Wisconsin

Wisconsin. Milton Friedman’s Reading Assignments in Economic Theory, 1940-1

 

 

In the previous post we have the syllabus for the summer course Economics 150 (Economic Theory) taught by James S. Earley in 1940. It is interesting to compare that syllabus with the reading assignments transcribed below for the same course as taught by Milton Friedman at the University of Wisconsin sometime during the academic year 1940-41 when Earley was on leave from the university. We see significant overlap but there are differences (e.g. Smith and Mill were added by Friedman). It is also interesting to compare this to the course “The Structure of Neoclassical Economics” taught by Milton Friedman in 1939-40 at Columbia.

_____________________

Reading Assignments in Economics 150
Instructor: Milton Friedman

*Recommended but not required.

Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics, Book III, ch. 2, 3, 4; Book V, ch. 1, 2.
F. H. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, ch. 3.
Frederic Benham, Economics, pp. 89-100.
*J. R. Hicks, Value and Capital, pp. 11-37.
Marshall, Book V, ch. 3, 4, 5, 12, Appendix H.
A. L. Meyers, Elements of Modern Economics, ch. 5, 7, 8, 9.
Joan Robinson, Economics of Imperfect Competition, ch. 2.
J. M. Clark, The Economics of Overhead Cost, ch. 9.
Jacob Viner, “Cost Curves and Supply Curves”, Zeitschrift fuer Nationaloekonomie, Bd. III (Sept., 1931), pp. 23-46 (in English)..
Edward Chamberlin, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Ch. 3, sec. 1, 4, 5, 6; ch. 5.
*M. Abramovitz, “Monopolistic Selling in a Changing Economy”, Q.J.E., Feb., 1938, pp. 191-214.
R. F. Harrod, “Doctrines of Imperfect Competition”, Q.J.E., May 1934 sec. 1, pp. 442-61.
Marshall, Book V, ch. 6.
J. B. Clark, The Distribution of Wealth, Preface, ch. 1, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 23.
John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy, Book II, ch. 14.
J. R. Hicks, Theory of Wages, ch. 1-6.
Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book I, ch. 10.
Marshall, Book VI, ch. 1-5.
Simon Kuznets and Milton Friedman, “Incomes from Independent Professional Practice”, Bulletin 72-3, National Bureau of Economic Research, sec. 5, appendix.
F. H. Knight, “Interest,” in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, also in Ethics of Competition.
J. M. Keynes. General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money., ch. 11-14.

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Papers of Milton Friedman. Box 76, Folder 6 “University of Chicago Econ. 150 [sic, “University of Wisconsin 1940-41” is correct].

Image Source: Columbia University, Columbia 250 Celebrates Columbians Ahead of Their Time.

Categories
Courses Suggested Reading Syllabus Wisconsin

Wisconsin. Economic Theory Syllabus. James S. Earley, 1940

 

James S. Earley was an assistant professor of economics on leave from the University of Wisconsin during Milton Friedman’s year in Madison, 1940-41. The syllabus for his course transcribed for this post was found in Milton Friedman’s papers along with Friedman’s own syllabus for the course (next post).

____________________

James S. Earley, Life and resources.

1908 (October 16) Born, Valley City, North Dakota
1932 A.B., Antioch College
1934 M.A., University of Wisconsin
1937-67 Faculty member at the University of Wisconsin
1939 Ph.D., University of Wisconsin
1940-41 Economist, National Defense Advisory Commission and Office of Price Administration and Civilian Supply
1941-45 Economist, Office of Price Administration, serving as member of the Economic Adviser’s Panel and later as Head Economist in the Office of the Economic Adviser
1945 Adviser on British Commonwealth Financial Affairs, Department of State
1967- University of California, Riverside
1997 (July 5) Died in Riverside, CA

Earley’s wartime papers (1942-1945) are available at the Harry S. Truman Library.

An Oral History Interview with James Earley was conducted in 1982 and is available on-line at the UW-Madison Oral History Program. He discusses the hiring of Milton Friedman at 41:43 of the second part of the interview.

Warren J. Samuels, (2003), Lectures by James S. Earley on the development of economics, University of Wisconsin, 1954–1955, in Warren J. Samuels (ed.) Histories of Economic Thought (Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, Volume 21 Part 2) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.89 – 271

 

____________________

 

ECONOMICS 150S—ECONOMIC THEORY
Summer Session, 1940

James S. Earley
Syllabus

Six Week Session: Topics I-VII, inclusive
Eight Week Session: Topics I-XI, inclusive

 

(**before a reference denotes reading requires of all students. *denotes reading required of graduate students but not of undergraduates. References marked ≠ are required of undergraduate students only. Other references are for additional reading, as desired. Copies of all required works will be found in Bascom Reading Room or in the Periodical Room; most of the others will also be found in Bascom. Full titles and references are given in the appended bibliography.)

 

I. (June 25, 26)
Nature, Purposes, and Methods of Economic Analysis

**Marshall, Appendices C, D.: Book I, Chap. III.
Meyers, Chapters I, II.
Keynes, J. Neville.
Knight, Ethics of Competition, pp. 105-47.
Knight, Risk, etc., Chap. I.
McIsaac and Smith, Chap. I.
Robbins, esp. Chaps. IV, V.
Roll, Part I, Sections 1, 2, 3, 5.
Fraser.

II. (June 27, 28, 29)
Consumer Demand

**Garver & Hansen, pp. 103-110, and Chap. IX.
*Marshall, Book III, Chaps. III, IV, VI.
≠Meyers, Chaps. III, IV.
Benham, op. cit., Appendix on Indifference Curves, pp. 89-98.
Hicks, Value and Capital, Chaps. I, II, III.
Knight, Ethics, pp. 15-60.
Knight, Risk, etc., Chap. III, esp. pp. 58-73.
McIsaac and Smith, Chap. IV, pp. 51-68.
Roll, Part II, Section I.
Boddy, Stigler and Garver, pp. 4-10.

III. (July 1, 2, 3)
Average and Marginal Curves; Types of Market Situations

**Meade, pp. 101-7; “Appendix of the Graphs”, pp. 411-424.
**Meyers, Chap. V.
**McIsaac and Smith, pps. 33-50; 128-31.
McIsaac and Smith, pp. 69-81.
Robinson, Imperfect Competition, Chap. 17.

 

IV. (July 5, 6)
Market Price: Temporary Equilibrium of Demand and Supply under Competitive and “Monopolistic” Conditions.

*Marshall, Book V, Chap. II.
≠Meyers, Chap. VI, pp. 63-75, and Chap. VII.
Davenport, Chap. V.
Garver & Hansen, Chap. VIII, pp. 110-125; 128-131.
Knight, “Cost of Production”, Sections I, II.

 

V: (July 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16)
“Normal” Price: The Time Analysis; Costs of Production; The Economics of the Firm; “Normal” Equilibrium Under Competitive Conditions

**Marshall, Book V, Chaps. III, V.
**Meyers, Chap. VIII.
*Knight, “Cost of Production—“, Sections I-IV inc
*Robinson, Imperfect Competition, pp. 92-97.
Boddy et al, pp. 11-18; 19-23.
Chamberlin, Chap. II.
Garver and Hansen, Chap. X, esp. pp. 160-167.
Henderson, Chap. X.
Hicks, Value and Capital, Chaps. IV, V, VI.
Knight, Risk, etc., Chap. III.
Marshall, Book V, Chap. IV.
Meade, Part II, Chap I, pp. 107-116.
McIsaac and Smith, pp. 85-110; 114-27; 163-78.
Taussig, Vol. I, Chaps. 12-16.
Viner, “Cost Curves and Supply Curves”.

First Examination, Wenesday, July 17.

VI. (July 18, 19, 22, 23, 24)
“Normal Equilibrium Under Monopolistic Conditions; Competitive vs. Monopolistic Conditions and Economic Welfare

**Meade, Part II, Chaps. II, III, VI.
**Meyers, Chaps. IX.
Chamberlin, Chaps. IV, V.
Dennison and Galbraith, Chaps. I-VI.
Garver and Hansen, Chap. XII, XIII.
Harrod.
Marshall, Book V, Chap. XIV.
Meade, Part II, Chaps. VII, VIII.
McIsaac and Smith, pp. 128-62; 178-86.
Pigou.
Robinson, Imperfect Competition, Chaps. 3, 11, 13.
Taussig, Vol. I, Chaps. 17, 18.
Meyers, Chap. X.

VII. (July 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, August 1)
The Theory of Distribution: General Principles, Competitive and Monopolistic

**Meade, Part II, Chap. V.
**Meade, Part III, Chap. I.
*Chamberlin, Chap. VIII. (3rd edition).
*Marshall, Book V, Chap. VI.
≠Meyers, Chap. XI.
McIsaac and Smith, pp. 248-59.
McIsaac and Smith, Chap. X.
Henderson, Chap. V.
Hicks, Value and Capital, Chaps. VII, VIII.
Robinson, Imperfect Competition, Chaps. 20, 21, 22, 27.

 

Final Exam for Six Weeks Students, Second Exam for Eight Weeks Students: August 2.

 

VIII. (August 5, 6)
Rent

**Marshall, pp. 415-424.
*Holland.
*Robinson, Imperfect Competition, Chap. 8, sections 1-7 inclusive.
≠Garver and Hansen, Chap. XXV.
Henderson, Chap. VI.
Marshall, Book V, Chaps. VIII, IX, X; Book VI, Chap. IX.
Meyers, Chap. XIV.
McIsaac and Smith, pp. 278-94.

 

IX. (August 7, 8, 9)
Wages

*Dobb, pp. 70-108.
*Marshall, Book VI, Chap. III, IV, V.
≠Meyers, Chap. XII.
≠Marshall, Book VI, pp. 559-73.
Garver and Hansen, Chap. XXVI.
Hicks, J. R., Theory of Wages, esp. pp. 8ff.
Meade, Part IV, Chap. II.
Robinson, Imperfect Competition, Chaps. 25, 26.
Robertson.

 

X. (August 12 13)
Profits

**Meyers, Chap. XV.
*Knight, Article on “Profit” in Encyclopedia S.S.
Knight, Risk, etc., esp. pp. 22-48; 264-90.
Garver and Hansen, Chap. XXVII.
Marshall, Book VI, Chap. VII.
McIsaac and Smith, Chap. XIV, pp. 344-57; 374-8.

 

XI. (August 14, 15)
Interest

**Meyers, Chaps. XIII, XVI.
**Robinson, Introduction, Chaps. VIII, IX.
*Keynes, J. M., Chaps. 13, 14.
Hicks, Value and Capital, Chaps. XI, XII, XIII.
Lerner.
McIsaac and Smith, Chaps. XII, XIII.
Meade, Part I, Chaps. II, III.
Meade, Part IV, Chap. III.
Marshall, Book VI, Chap. VI.

 

Final Examination for Eight Weeks Students: Friday, August 16.

 

Bibliography

Frederic Benham. Economics, especially Appendix to Chap. VI, “Indifference Curves”, pp. 89-100.
F.M. Boddy, G. J. Stiger and F. B. Garver. Materials for Advanced General Economics.
E. Chamberlin. Theory of Monopolistic Competition (3rd edition).
H. J. Davenport. Economics of Enterprise.
H. S. Dennison & J. K. Galbraith. Modern Competition and Business Policy.
Maurice Dobb. Wages.
L. M. Fraser. Economic Thought and Language.
Garver and Hansen. Principles of Economics (1937 edition).
Lewis Haney. Value and Distribution.
R. F. Harrod. “Doctrines of Imperfect Competition”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1934, pp. 442 ff.
H. D. Henderson. Supply and Demand.
J. R. Hicks. Theory of Wages.
J. R. Hicks. Value and Capital.
M. Tappan Holland. “Marshall on Rent”, Economic Journal, Sept. 1930, pp. 369-383.
J. M. Keynes. General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.
J. Neville Keynes. Scope and Method of Political Economy.
W. H. Kiekhofer. Economic Principles, Problems and Policies.
F. H. Knight. Article entitled “Cost of Production and Price Over Long and Short Periods” in Ethics of Competition (pp. 186-216) or in Journal of Political Economy for 1921 (pp. 304-35).
F. H. Knight. Article on Profit in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
F. H. Knight. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit.
A. P. Lerner. “Alternative Formulations of the Theory of Interest”, Economic Journal, June 1938. (pp. 211-30)
Alfred Marshall. Principles of Economics (5th to 8th eds.)
Albert L. Meyers. Elements of Modern Economics.
J. E. Meade & C. J. Hitch. Introduction to Economic Analysis and Policy (American Edition, 1938).
McIsaac and Smith. Introduction to Economic Analysis.
A. C. Pigou, Economics of Welfare.
D. H. Robertson. “Wage Grumbles” and “Economic Incentive” in Economic Fragments.
Joan Robinson. Economics of Imperfect Competition.
Joan Robinson. Introduction to the Thoery of Employment.
Lionel Robbins. Nature and Significance of Economic Science.
Erich Roll. Elements of Economic Theory.
F. W. Taussig. Principles of Economics (Fourth Edition, 1939).
Jacob Viner. Article on “Cost” in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
Jacob Viner. “Cost Curves and Supply Curves”, Zeitschrift für National-Ökonomie, 1932, (pp. 23-46). The Article is in English.

 

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Papers of Milton Friedman. Box 81, Folder 10 “Economics Miscellaneous”.

 

Image Source: Detail from a photograph in Wisconsin State Journal (May 6, 1948) at the Wisconsin Historical Society.