Categories
Economists Harvard Transcript

Harvard. Economics Graduate Record of Paul Samuelson. PhD 1941

Joseph Schumpeter chaired the general economics Ph.D. exam and the special Ph.D. exam of Paul Samuelson. In the course transcript of the Graduate School of Arts and Science, we see that Schumpeter awarded Samuelson the presumably maximum maximorum grade of “A plus plus” in his course.

By the end of the 1930s the individual student records of Ph.D. candidates in Harvard’s Division of History, Government, and Economics were little more than the three page application for candidacy for the Ph.D. degree along with a fourth page on which the completion of degree requirements was duly recorded: the satisfaction of French and German reading skills, passing grades for the general and special Ph.D. exams, acceptance of the thesis by readers and a transcript of Harvard coursework (presumably to satisfy residency requirements). The grade reports for the general and special exams include little more that the grade awarded, the members of the examination committee, and occasionally a sentence or two remark on the candidate’s performance.

_______________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DIVISION OF HISTORY, GOVERNMENT, AND ECONOMICS

Application for Candidacy for the Degree of Ph.D.

[Note: Boldface used to indicate printed text of the application; italics used to indicate the handwritten entries]

I. Full Name, with date and place of birth.

Paul Anthony Samuelson, May 15, 1915; Gary, Indiana.

II. Academic Career: (Mention, with dates inclusive, colleges or other higher institutions of learning attended; and teaching positions held.)

University of Chicago — 1932-35

III. Degrees already attained. (Mention institutions and dates.)

A.B. — 1935 — U. of C.

IV. General Preparation. (Indicate briefly the range and character of your under-graduate studies in History, Economics, Government, and in such other fields as Ancient and Modern Languages, Philosophy, etc. In case you are a candidate for the degree in History, state the number of years you have studied preparatory and college Latin.)

Econ. Theory, 5 quarters; Econ Stat, 2; Acc’ting, 1; Labor Problems, 2; Public Finance; Econ. Hist. 2; Money & Banking, 1; Sociology, 3; Pol. Science, 4; History 7;
Reading Knowledge Exam in French and German for Ph.D., U. of C.
Anthrop. 1; Educ. 1; Mathematics, 3 quarters

V. Department of Study. (Do you propose to offer yourself for the Ph.D., “History,” in “Economics,” or in “Political Science”?)

Economics

VI. Choice of Subjects for the General Examination. (State briefly the nature of your preparation in each subject, as by Harvard courses, courses taken elsewhere, private reading, teaching the subject, etc., etc.)

  1. Economic Theory. – Econ. 11, 15b, 18
  2. Economic Statistics – Econ 32b Econ 31a
  3. Money and Banking – Econ 50
  4. Mathematical Economics Econ 8a, 18
  5. [Note: this field has a red bracket] Economic History – Econ 23
  6. Theory 

VII. Special Subject for the special examination.

Economic Theory

VIII. Thesis Subject. (State the subject and mention the instructor who knows most about your work upon it.)

[Left blank]

IX. Examinations. (Indicate any preferences as to the time of the general and special examinations.)

[Left blank]

X. Remarks

[Left blank]

Signature of a member of the Division certifying approval of the above outline of subjects.

[signed] H. H. Burbank

*   *   *   [Last page of application] *   *   *

[Not to be filled out by the applicant]

Name: Paul Anthony Samuelson

ApprovedFebruary 25, 1936

Ability to use French certified by November 5, 1935.Dr. A. E. Monroe.

Ability to use German certified by November 4, 1936. Dr. A. E. Monroe.

Date of general examination May 18, 1936. Passed. J.A.S.

Thesis received  November 12, 1940.

read by Professors Schumpeter and E. B. Wilson.

approved November 26, 1940.

Date of special examination December 4, 1940. Passed, J.A.S.

Recommended for the Doctorate 2/4/41

Degree conferred 2/17/41

Remarks.  [Left blank]

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

General examination,
Departmental Report

DIVISION OF HISTORY, GOVERNMENT, AND ECONOMICS
Report on Examinations for Graduate Degrees

Name of Candidate: Paul Anthony Samuelson

Date of Examination: Monday, May 18, 1936.

Department of Economics

Fields Examined: 1. Economic Theory, 2. Statistics, 3. Money and Banking, 4. Mathematical Economics

The Committee certifies that the General Special Examination of the candidate was

Excellent
Good
Fair
Unsatisfactory

Committee: Professors Schumpeter (chairman), Harris, Leontief, Dr. Gordon

Further comments may be made below.

A remarkable showing in economic theory but less strong in the applied field

Chairman
[signed]
Joseph Schumpeter

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Transcript of Paul A. Samuelson in the
Graduate School of Arts and Sciences

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES

24 UNIVERSITY HALL,
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS

November 21, 1940

Transcript of the record of Mr Paul Anthony Samuelson

1935-36
COURSE GRADE
Economics 11 (1 course) A plus (mid-year grade)
Economics 121 (½ course) A minus
Economics 31a1 (½ course) A plus
Economics 50 (1 course) Excused
Economics 15b2 (½ course) A plus plus [sic]
Economics 32b2 (½ course) A minus
1936-37
COURSE GRADE
Economics 133 (1 course) A
Economics 143 (1 course) A
Economics 151 (1 course) A
Economics 145a1 (½ course) A plus
Economics 145b2 (½ course) A plus

Mr. Samuelson received the degree of Master of Arts in June, 1936.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Notice of Time and Place
of Special Examination

9 Holyoke House
November 26, 1940

Dear Mr. Samuelson:

The arrangements have been completed for your special examination for the degree of Ph.D. in Economics. It is to be held on Wednesday, December 4, at 4. p.m. in Littauer Center M-10.

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]
Secretary.

Mr. Paul A. Samuelson
11 Ware Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Special examination,
Division Report

DIVISION OF HISTORY, GOVERNMENT, AND ECONOMICS
Report on Examinations for Graduate Degree

Name of Candidate: Paul Anthony Samuelson

Date of Examination: Wednesday, December 4, 1940, at 4 o’clock

Department of Economics

Fields Examined: Special Field: Economic Theory

Thesis: “Foundations of Analytical Economics: The Observational Significance of Economic Theory.”

The Committee certified that the General Special Examination of the candidate was

Excellent
Good
Fair
Failed, no bar to re-examination
Failed, recommended not to request re-examination

Committee: Professors Schumpeter (chairman), Wilson, Chamberlin, Dr. Taylor

Further comments may be made below.

The performance was excellent not only in mathematical but also in general economic theory.

[signed]
Josef Schumpeter
E.B. Wilson
O.H. Taylor
E.H. Chamberlin

Source: Harvard University Archives. Division of History, Government & Economics. PhD. Material 1939-42, Box 20.

__________________________

Course Names and Instructors
(1935-36)

Economics 11
Economic Theory
Prof. William F. Taussig
Economics 121
Monopolistic Competition and Allied Problems in Value Theory
Prof. Edward H. Chamberlin
Economics 31a1
Theory of Economic Statistics, I
Prof. William L. Crum and
Asst. Prof. Edward Frickey
Economics 50
Principles of Money and Banking
Prof. John H. Williams
Economics 15b2
Selected Problems in Advance Economic Theory
Prof. Joseph A. Schumpeter
and an assistant
Economics 32b2
Topics in Statistical Theory
Prof. E. B. Wilson

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College 1935-36pp. 82-84.

Course Names and Instructors
(1936-37)

Economics 133
Recent Economic History
Prof. Abbott Paysan Usher
Economics 143
International Trade
Prof. Gottfried Haberler
Economics 151
Public Finance
Professor Harold H. Burbank
Economics 145a1
Business Cycles and Economic Forecasting
Prof. Joseph A. Schumpeter
Economics 145b2
Seminar. Business Cycles and Economic Forecasting
Prof. Joseph A. Schumpter and Assoc. Prof. Gottfried Haberler

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College 1936-37, pp. 93-94.

Image Source: Original black-and-white photo of Samuelson from the slideshow at the M.I.T. Memorial Service (April 10, 2010).  Colorized by Economics in the Rear-view Mirror.

Categories
Economic History Exam Questions Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. European and U.S. Economic History. Reading Lists and Exams. Gay, 1908-09

This post provides the double dose of economic history taught by Professor Edwin Francis Gay at Harvard in the 1908-09 academic year. I have transcribed the reading lists and final exams for the courses covering 19th century European economic history and United States economic history below.

A short bibliography for “serious students” of economic history assembled by Gay and published in 1910 was posted earlier.

__________________________

Course Enrollment
19th Century European Economic History, 1908-09

Economics 6a 1hf. Professor Gay, assisted by Mr. M. T. [Melvin Thomas] Copeland — European Industry and Commerce in the Nineteenth Century.

Total 109: 11 Graduates, 28 Seniors, 48 Juniors, 19 Sophomores, 3 Others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1908-1909, p. 67.

__________________________

Reading List
19th Century European Economic History, 1908-09

ECONOMICS 6a (1908)

Required Reading is indicated by an asterisk (*)

  1. GENERAL CONDITIONS. – COLONIAL POLICY.

*Smith, Colonial Policy of Europe, in Rand (4th ed.), pp. 1-30.

*Seeley, Expansion of England (ed. 1883), pp. 98-160.

Warner, Landmarks in English Industrial History, pp. 281-300.

Mantoux, La Révolution Industrielle, pp. 73-125.

  1. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION.

*Toynbee, Industrial Revolution, pp. 32-93,

*Hobson, Evolution of Modern Capitalism, pp. 10-82.

Cunningham, Growth of English Industry and Commerce, Vol. III, pp. 609-619.

Walpole, History of England, Vol. I, pp. 50-76. (Rand, pp. 31-54.)

Wallas, Life of Francis Place, pp. 197-240.

Hutchins and Harrison, History of Factory Legislation, pp. 14-42.

Webb, History of Trade Unionism, pp. 1-101.

Mantoux, La Révolution Industrielle, pp. 349-502.

  1. AGRARIAN MOVEMENT. – CONTINENT.

*Von Sybel, French Revolution, in Rand, pp. 55-85.

*Seeley, Life and Times of Stein, Vol. I, pp. 287-297. (Rand, pp. 86-98.)

*Morier, Agrarian Legislation of Prussia, in “Systems of Land Tenure,” pp. 267-275. (Rand, pp. 98-108.)

Colman, European Agriculture (2d ed.), Vol. I1, pp. 371-394.

Flour de St. Genis, La Propriétée Rurale, pp. 80-164.

De Foville, Le Morcellement, pp. 52-89.

Goltz, Agrarwesen und Agrarpolitik, pp. 40-50.

  1. AGRARIAN MOVEMENT. – ENGLAND.

*Taylor, Decline of Land-Owning Farmers in England, pp. 1-61.

Brodrick, English Land and English Landlords, pp. 65-240.

Prothero, Pioneers and Progress of English Farming, pp. 64-103.

Caird, English Agriculture in 1850, pp. 473-528.

Colman, European Agriculture (2d ed.), Vol. I, pp. 10-109, 133-174

  1. THE FREE TRADE MOVEMENT. – ENGLAND.

*Levi, History of British Commerce, pp. 218-227, 261-272, 292-303. (Rand, pp. 207-241.)

*Morley, Life of Cobden, Vol. I, pp. 140-172, 355-389.

Ashworth, Recollections of Cobden and the League, pp. 32-64,

296-392.

Prentice, History of the Anti-Corn Law League, Vol. I, pp. 49-77.

Parker, Sir Robert Peel from his Private Letters, Vol. II, pp. 522-559; Vol. III, pp. 220-252.

  1. THE TARIFF. – CONTINENT.

*Ashley, Modern Tariff History, pp. 3-62, 301-312, [267-300]

Worms, L’Allemagne Economique, pp. 57-393.

Amé, Les Tarifs de Douanes, Vol. I, pp. 21-34, 219-316.

Perigot, Histoire de Commerce Français, pp. 77-185.

  1. FINANCE.

*Cunningham, Growth of English Industry and Commerce, Vol. III (ed. 1903), pp. 689-703, 822-829, 833-840.

*Hobson, Evolution of Modern Capitalism, pp. 167-219.

Tugan-Baranowsky, Studien zur Theorie und Geschichte der Handelskrisen in England, pp. 38-54, 62-121.

Giffen, Growth of Capital, pp. 115-134.

Macleod, Theory and Practice of Banking (4th ed.), Vol. I, pp. 433-540; Vol. II, pp. 1-197

Bastable, Public Finance, Bk. V, chaps. 3 and 4 (3d ed.), pp. 629-657

  1. THE NEW GOLD.

*Cairnes, Essays, pp. 53-108. (Rand, pp. 242-284.)

*Chevalier. On Gold (3d English ed.), pp. 1-9, 40-71, 99-106.

Jevons, Investigations in Currency and Finance, pp. 34-92.

Leroy-Beaulieu, Traité d’Economie Politique, Vol. III, pp. 192-238.

Giffen, Economic Inquiries and Studies, Vol. I, pp. 75-97.

  1. TRANSPORTATION. – ENGLAND AND FRANCE.

*Hadley, Railroad Transportation, pp. 146-202, 236-258.

Ross, British Railways, pp. 1-36.

—— The Railway Clearing House, pp. 7-28.

Findlay, Working and Management of an English Railway (6th ed.), pp. 262-322.

Meyer, Governmental Regulation of Railway Rates, pp. 123-132.

Colson, Legislation des Chemins de Fer, pp. 3-20, 133-182.

Kaufmann, Die Eisenbahnpolitik Frankreichs, Vol. II, pp. 178-284.

Guillamot, L’Organisation des Chemins de Fer, pp. 82-120.

Forbes and Ashford, Our Waterways, pp. 107-137.

Colson, Transports et Tarifs, pp. 80-145.

Léon, Fleuves, Canaux, Chemins de Fer, pp. 1-70.

  1. TRANSPORTATION. – GERMANY AND RUSSIA.

*Meyer, Governmental Regulation of Railway Rates, pp. 93-122, 133-188.

Hadley, Railroad Transportation, pp. 203-235.

Mayer, Geschichte und Geographie des Deutschen Eisenbahnen, pp. 3-14.

Leuschau, Deutsche Wasserstrassen, pp. 9-56, 95-162.

De Koulomzine, Le Transsibérien, pp. 1-53, 261-312.

  1. COMMERCE AND SHIPPING.

*Meeker, History of Shipping Subsidies, pp. 1-95.

*Bowley, England’s Foreign Trade in the Nineteenth Century (ed. 1905), pp. 55-107.

Fry, History of North Atlantic Steam Navigation, pp. 55-106, 207-249.

Cornewall-Jones, British Merchant Service, pp. 252-260, 306-317.

Day, History of Commerce, pp. 373-379, 399-405.

LeRoux de Bretagne, Les Primes à la Marine Marchande, pp. 93-224.

Rossignol, Le Canal de Suez, pp. 23-148.

  1. AGRICULTURAL DEPRESSION.

*Report on Agricultural Depression, 1897, pp. 6-87.

Pratt, Organization of Agriculture, pp. 1-104, 269-391.

Haggard, Rural England, Vol. I1, pp. 536-576.

Channing, Truth about the Agricultural Depression, pp. 1-59, 311-320.

Arch, Autobiography, pp. 65-144, 300-345.

Fillmore, Agricultural Laborer, pp. 12-24.

Winfrey, Progress of Small Holdings Movement, Econ. Jour., Vol. XVI, pp. 222-229.

Plunkett, Ireland in the New Century (ed. 1905), pp. 175-209.

Bastable, Some Features of the Economic Movement in Ireland, Econ. Jour., Vol. XI, pp. 31-42.

Imbart de la Tour, Le Crise Agricole, pp. 24-34, 127-223.

Bretano, Agrarian Reform in Prussia, Econ, Jour., Vol. VII, pp. 1-20, 165-184.

  1. RECENT TARIFF HISTORY.

*Smart, Return to Protection, pp. 7-44, 136-185, 284-259.

Ashley, W. J., Tariff Problem, pp. 53-167.

Ashley, P., Modern Tariff History, pp. 78-112, 313-358.

Dawson, Protection in Germany, pp. 17-160.

Dietzel, German Tariff Controversy, Q.J.E., Vol. XVII, pp. 365-417.

Zimmermann, Deutsche Handelspolitik, pp. 218-314.

Fisher, Protectionist Reaction in France, Econ. Jour., Vol. VI, pp. 341-355.

Meredith, Protection in France, pp. 54-129.

  1. INDUSTRIAL COMBINATION.

*Macrosty, Trust Movement in British Industry, pp. 24-56, 81-84, 117-154, 284-307, 329-345.

*Report of Industrial Commission, Vol. XVIII, pp. 7-13, 75-88, 101-122, 143-165.

Report of Industrial Commission, Vol. XVIII, pp. 14-38.

Smith, New Trades Combination Movement, pp. 1-96.

Walker, Monopolistic Combinations in Europe, Pol. Sci. Quart., Vol. XX, pp. 13-41.

———, Combinations in German Coal Industry, pp. 38-111, 175-289, 322-327.

Liefmann, Kartelle und Trusts, pp. 22-32.

Baumgarten und Meszlény, Kartelle und Trusts, pp. 83-152.

  1. LABOR, COÖPERATIVE MOVEMENT.

*Bowley, Wages in the United Kingdom, pp. 22-57, 81-127.

*Ashley, W. J., Progress of German Working Classes, pp. 60-65, 74-141, [1-52].

Shadwell, Industrial Efficiency, Vol. II, pp. 307-350.

Giffen, Essays in Finance (2d series), pp. 372-474.

Howell, Labor Legislation, pp. 447-499.

Webb, Trade Unionism, pp. 344-478.

Willoughby, Workingmen’s Insurance, pp. 29-87.

Gide, Productive Coöperation in France, Q.J.E., Vol. XIV, pp. 30-66.

Bertrand, Le Mouvement Coopératif en Belgique, Rev. d’Econ. Pol., Vol. XIII, pp. 668-694.

Adams and Sumner, Labor Problems, pp. 394-397, 407-413.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics 1895-2003. Box 1, Folder “Economics, 1908-1909”.

__________________________

ECONOMICS 6a
19th Century European Economic History
Mid-year Examination, 1908-09

  1. Toynbee says concerning the English yeomanry: “It was not till about 1760 that the process of extinction became rapid. … It was the political conditions of the age, the overwhelming importance of land, which made it impossible for the yeoman to keep his grip upon the soil.”
    Von Sybel states that in France prior to the Revolution “a middle class of proprietors, substantial enough to derive from their land a sufficient livelihood, and yet humble enough to be bound to constant and diligent labor, was entirely wanting. … But what the movement of 1789 did produce is this middle class of proprietors.”
    Comment on these statements. How, furthermore, do you account for the divergence of development between French and English agrarian conditions
  2. (1) Criticise the following statements:
    “Il est évident que nous serious plus riches si nos exportations avaient été plus considérables et nos importations moines fortes.” — Méline.
    “It is a mathematical truth that if imports come into this country of manufactured goods which we can make as well as any other nation, they must displace labor.” — Mr. Chamberlain.
    (2) “What brings great changes of policy is the shifting and readjustments of interests, not the discovery of new principles.” — John Morley.
    Illustrate this from the tariff history of Germany, France, and England.
  1. “Ability to compete in the world’s market is a vital matter for Germany. …To this achievement the State railways have contributed in the past practically nothing. … Nor will the railways be able to do much more in the future than they have done in the past.” Who says this? Give the arguments for and against this view.
  2. Discuss the recent agricultural depression in England.
  3. (1) Compare concisely the trust movement in England, Germany, and France.
    (2) What were the provisions of the Austrian bill of 1897 to regulate industrial combinations?
  4. The Report of the Industrial Commission says that “France is less developed industrially than England and Germany.” What does this mean? Can such a statement be verified by the comparison of statistics? If so, what statistics would you use? What are the chief factors which have determined industrial development in the nineteenth century, and why, in your opinion, have they not operated equally in the three countries named?

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examination Papers, 1873-1915. Box 8, Bound vol. Examination Papers 1908-09; Papers Set for Final Examinations in History, Government, Economics,…,Music in Harvard College (June, 1909), pp. 37-38.

________________________

Course Enrollment
United States Economic History
1908-09

Economics 6b 2hf. Professor Gay, assisted by Mr. M. T. [Melvin Thomas] Copeland — Economic and Financial History of the United States.

Total 198: 15 Graduates, 41 Seniors, 87 Juniors, 41 Sophomores, 7 Freshmen, 7 Others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1908-1909, p. 68.

________________________

Reading List
United States Economic History
ECONOMICS 6b (1909)

Required Reading is indicated by an asterisk (*)

  1. COLONIAL PERIOD.

*Ashley, Commercial Legislation of England and the American Colonies, Q.J.E., Vol. XIV, pp. 1-29; printed also in Ashley’s Surveys, pp. 309-335.

*Semple, American History and its Geographic Conditions, pp. 36-51.

McMaster, History of the People of the United States, Vol. I, pp. 1-102.

Eggleston, Transit of Civilization, pp. 273-307.

Beer, Commercial Policy of England, pp. 5-158.

Rabbeno, American Commercial Policy, pp. 3-91.

Lord, Industrial Experiments in the British Colonies of North America, pp. 56-86, 124-139.

1776-1860.
  1. COMMERCE, MANUFACTURES, AND TARIFF.

*Taussig, Tariff History of the United States, pp. 68-154.

*Hamilton, Report on Manufactures, in Taussig’s State Papers and Speeches on the Tariff, pp. 1-79, 103-107, (79-103).

Bolles, Industrial History of the United States, Book II, pp. 403-426.

Bishop, History of American Manufactures, Vol. II, pp. 256-505.

Pitkin, Statistical View of the Commerce of the United States (ed. 1835), pp. 368-412.

Gallatin, Free Trade Memorial, in Taussig’s State Papers, pp. 108-213.

Rabbeno, American Commercial Policy, pp. 146-183.

Hill, First Stages of the Tariff Policy of the United States, Amer. Econ. Assoc. Pub., Vol. VIII, pp. 107-132.

  1. INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS.

*Callender, Early Transportation and Banking Enterprises, Q.J.E., Vol. XVII, pp. 111-162; printed also separately, pp. 3-54.

Tenth United States Census (1880), Vol. IV, Thos. C. Purdy’s Reports on History of Steam Navigation in the United States, pp. 1-62, and History of Operating Canals in the United States, pp. 1-32.

Chevalier, Society, Manners and Politics in the United States, pp. 80-87, 209-276.

Ringwalt, Development of Transportation Systems in the United States, pp. 41-54, 64-166.

Phillips, History of Transportation in the Eastern Cotton Belt, pp. 46-131.

Bishop, State Works of Pennsylvania, pp. 150-261.

Gallatin, Plan of Internal Improvements, Amer. State Papers, Misc., Vol. I, pp. 724-921 (see especially maps, pp. 744, 762, 764, 820, 830).

Pitkin, Statistical View (1835), pp. 531-581.

Chittenden, Steamboat Navigation on the Missouri River, Vol. II, pp. 417-424.

  1. AGRICULTURE AND LAND POLICY. — WESTWARD MOVEMENT.

*Hart, Practical Essays on American Government, pp. 233-257 printed also in Q.J.E., Vol. I, pp. 169-183, 251-254.

*Hammond, Cotton Industry, pp. 67-119.

*Semple, American History and its Geographic Conditions, pp. 52-74.

Turner, Significance of the Frontier in American History, in Report of Amer. Hist. Assoc., 1893, pp. 199-227.

Donaldson, Public Domain, pp. 1-29, 196-239, 332-356.

Hibbard, History of Agriculture in Dane County, Wisconsin, pp. 86-90, 105-133.

Sanborn, Congressional Grants of Land in Aid of Railways, Bulletin of Univ. of Wisconsin Econ., Pol. Sci. and Hist. Series, Vol. II, No. 3, pp. 269-354.

Hart, History as Told by Contemporaries, Vol. III, pp. 459-478.

  1. THE SOUTH AND SLAVERY.

*Cairnes, The Slave Power (2d ed.), pp. 32-103, 140-178.

Hammond, Cotton Industry, pp. 34-66.

Russell, North America, its Agriculture and Climate, pp. 133-167.

De Tocqueville, Democracy in America (ed. 1838), pp. 336-361, or eds. 1841 and 1848, Vol. I, pp. 386-412.

Helper, Compendium of the Impending Crisis of the South, pp. 7-61.

Ballagh, Land System of the South, Publications of Amer. Hist. Assoc., 1897, pp. 101-129.

  1. FINANCE, BANKING AND CURRENCY.

*Dewey, Financial History of the United States, pp. 34-59, 76-117, 224-246, 252-262.

*Catterall, The Second Bank of the United States, pp. 1-24, 68-119, 376 map, 402-403, 464-477.

Bullock, Essays on the Monetary History of the United States, pp. 60-93.

Hamilton, Reports on Public Credit, Amer. State Papers, Finance, Vol. I, pp. 15-37, 64-76.

Kinley, History of the Independent Treasury, pp. 16-39.

Sumner, Andrew Jackson (ed. 1886), pp. 224-249, 257-276, 291-342.

Ross, Sinking Funds, pp. 21-85.

Scott, Repudiation of State Debts, pp. 33-196.

Bourne, History of the Surplus Revenue of 1837, pp. 1-43, 125-135.

Conant, History of Modern Banks of Issue, pp. 310-347.

1860-1900.
  1. FINANCE, BANKING AND CURRENCY.

*Mitchell, History of the Greenbacks, pp. 3-43, 403-420.

*Noyes, Thirty Years of American Finance, pp. 1-72, 234-254, (73-233).

Taussig, Silver Situation in the United States, pp. 1-157.

Dunbar, National Banking System, Q.J.E., Vol. XII, pp. 1-26; printed also in Dunbar’s Economic Essays, pp. 227-247.

Howe, Taxation and Taxes in the United States under the Internal Revenue System, pp. 136-262.

Tenth United States Census (1880), Vol. VII; Bayley, History of the National Loans, pp. 369-392, 444-486.

  1. TRANSPORTATION.

*Hadley, Railroad Transportation, pp. 1-23, 125-145.

*Johnson, American Railway Transportation, pp. 24-68, 307-321, 367-385.

Industrial Commission, Vol. XIX, pp. 466-481.

Adams, Chapters of Erie, pp. 1-99, 333-429.

Davis, The Union Pacific Railway, Annals of the Amer. Acad., Vol. VIII, pp. 259-303.

Villard, Memoirs, Vol. II, pp. 284-312.

Dixon, Interstate Commerce Act as Amended, Q.J.E., Vol. XXI, pp. 22-51.

  1. COMMERCE AND SHIPPING.

*Meeker, History of Shipping Subsidies, pp. 150-171.

Meeker, Shipping Subsidies, Pol. Sci. Quart., Vol. XX, pp. 594-611.

Soley, Maritime Industries of the United States, in Shaler’s United States, Vol. I, pp. 518-618.

McVey, Shipping Subsidies, J. Pol. Ec., Vol. IX, pp. 24-46.

Wells, Our Merchant Marine, pp. 1-94.

Day, History of Commerce, pp. 553-575.

  1. AGRICULTURE AND OPENING OF THE WEST.

*Industrial Commission, Vol. XIX, pp. 43-123, 134-167.

*Noyes, Recent Economic History of the United States, Q.J.E., Vol. XIX, pp. 167-187.

Twelfth United States Census (1900), Vol. V, pp. xvi-xlii.

Hammond, Cotton Industry, pp. 120-226.

Quaintance, Influence of Farm Machinery, pp. 1-103.

Adams, The Granger Movement, North American Review, Vol. CXX, pp. 394-424.

Bemis, Discontent of the Farmer, J. Pol. Ec., Vol. I, pp. 193-213.

  1. INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION.

*Twelfth United States Census (1900), Vol. VII, pp. clxx-clxxviii.

*Noyes, Thirty Years of American Finance, pp. 113-152, 182-233.

Industrial Commission, Vol. XIX, pp. 485-519, 544-569.

Twelfth Census, Vol. IX, pp. 1-16; Vol. X, pp. 725-748.

Wells, Recent Economic Changes, pp. 70-113.

Sparks, National Development, pp. 37-52.

  1. THE TARIFF.

*Taussig, Tariff History, pp. 155-229, 321-360.

Stanwood, American Tariff Controversies, Vol. II, pp. 243-394.

Taussig, Iron Industry, Q.J.E., Vol. XIV, pp. 143-170, 475-508.

Taussig, Wool and Woolens, Q.J.E., Vol. VIII, pp. 1-39.

Taussig, Sugar, Atlantic Monthly, Vol. CI, pp. 334-344.

Wright, Wool-growing and the Tariff since 1890, Q.J.E., Vol. XIX, p. 610-647.

Robinson, History of Two Reciprocity Treaties, pp. 9-17, 40-77, 141-156.

Laughlin and Willis, Reciprocity, pp. 311-487.

  1. INDUSTRIAL CONCENTRATION.

*Willoughby, Integration of Industry in the United States, Q.J.E., Vol. XVI, pp. 94-115.

*Noyes, Recent Economic History of the United States, Q.J.E., Vol. XIX, pp. 188-209.

Twelfth Census, Vol. VII, pp. cxc-ccxiv.

Industrial Commission, Vol. XIII, pp. v-xviii.

Bullock, Trust Literature, Q.J.E., Vol. XV, pp. 167-217.

  1. THE LABOR PROBLEM.

*Adams and Sumner, Labor Problems, pp. 502-547.

United States Bureau of Labor Bulletins, No. 18 (Sept., 1898), pp. 665-670; No. 30 (Sept., 1900), pp. 913-915; No. 53 (July, 1904), pp. 703-728.

Levassesur, American Workman, pp. 436-509.

Mitchell, Organized Labor, pp. 391-411.

Twelfth Census, Special Report on Employees and Wages, p. xcix.

National Civic Federation, Industrial Conciliation, pp. 40-48, 141-154, 238-243, 254-266.

  1. POPULATION, IMMIGRATION AND THE RACE QUESTION.

* United States Census Bulletin, No. 4 (1903), pp. 5-38.

*Industrial Commission, Vol. XV, pp. xix-lxiv.

Adams and Sumner, Labor Problems, pp. 68-112.

Mayo-Smith, Emigration and Immigration, pp. 33-78.

Walker, Discussions in Economies and Statistics, Vol. II, pp. 417-451.

Hoffmann, Race Traits and Tendencies of the American Negro, pp. 250-309.

Tillinghast, The Negro in Africa and America, pp. 102-228.

Twelfth Census Bulletin, No. 8.

United States Bureau of Labor Bulletins, Nos. 14, 22, 32, 35, 37, 38, 48.

Washington, Future of the American Negro, pp. 3-244.

Stone, A Plantation Experiment, Q.J.E., Vol. XIX, pp. 270-287.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics 1895-2003. Box 1, Folder “Economics, 1908-1909”.

________________________

United States Economic History
ECONOMICS 6b
Year-end Examination, 1909

  1. Compare the financial history of the United States during the period 1829-1840 with that of the period 1880-1896.
  2. Trace briefly the relation between tariff legislation and the public revenue since the establishment of the Independent Treasury.
    1. Comment on the following (from President Grant’s message of 1870):—
      “Building ships and navigating them utilizes vast capital at home; it creates a home market for the farm and the shop; it diminishes the balance of trade against us precisely to the extent of freights and passage money paid to American vessels, and gives us a supremacy of the seas of inestimable value in case of foreign war.”
    2. Was the balance of trade before 1870 “favorable” or “unfavorable” to the United States? Why?
  3. Sketch the history of wheat-growing in the United States: changes in geographical location, markets, and prices.
  4. What is meant by the integration of industry? How far has it affected, and how far do you think it will affect, the following industries: Cotton; woolen; iron; sugar; tobacco; boots and shoes? Give reasons.
  5. (a) The distribution of immigrants in the different industries as shown by the Industrial Commission report. (b) The alien contract labor law.
  6. State briefly what you consider to be the most significant point brought out in your thesis for this course.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examination Papers, 1873-1915. Box 8, Bound vol. Examination Papers 1908-09; Papers Set for Final Examinations in History, Government, Economics,…,Music in Harvard College (June, 1909), p. 38.

Image Source: John George Brown, The Longshoremen’s Noon, 1879, oil on canvas, National Gallery of Art, Washington, Corcoran Collection (Museum Purchase, Gallery Fund), 2014.136.2. From the National Gallery of Art’s web-page “Industrial Revolution.”

Categories
Exam Questions International Economics Northwestern Problem Sets Syllabus

Northwestern. Reading List and Exams for International Trade and Finance. Harwitz, 1962

The following course materials were found in Robert Clower’s papers at Duke University’s Economists’ Papers Archive. Clower collaborated with Mitchell Harwitz (MIT Ph.D., 1959) on a few papers and kept some of Harwitz’s course materials from their years together at Northwestern.

The course offers us some insight into International Economics à la Charles Kindleberger as taught by one of his former M.I.T. doctoral students.

____________________________

AEA Members Listing 1991

HARWITZ, MITCHELL, SUNY Buffalo, Dept. Econ, Buffalo, NY 14260.
Birth Yr: 1934.
Degrees: B.A., Brandeis U. 1954; Ph.D. M.I.T., 1959
Prin. Cur. Position: Assoc. Prof., SUNY at Buffalo, 1964
Concurrent/Past Positions: Asst. Prof., Northwestern U., 1958-64
Research: Temporal-spatial choice theory, labor coops with complex contracts.

Source: AEA Biographical Listing, 1993, p. 205

____________________________

Economics Ph.D., M.I.T. 1959

Dissertation: On Some Problems in the Dynamic Theories of International Trade and Economic Growth

Advisor: Charles Poor Kindleberger

Source: Mathematics Genealogy Project.

____________________________

LECTURE AND READING LIST

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Economics B-60
International Trade and Finance

Winter, 1962
Mr. Harwitz

There are a total of 36 class hours, of which two are devoted to mid-term examinations and three remain for reviews. The mid-term grades will constitute about 40% of the final grade.

The text is C. P. Kindleberger, International Economics, hereafter called K.

There will be a homework exercise on balance of payments accounting handed out after the January 11 lecture.

Date of Lecture

Topic

Reading

1/8

Introduction and review K, Ch. 1
Optional: Samuelson, Economics, Ch. 31, Ch. 32 and Appendix
I. Balance of Payments and FX Markets

1/9,10

A. Balance of Payments
1. Relation of B of P to National Income Accounts K, Ch. 2
2. Relation of items of B of P to FX markets
B. FX Markets K, Ch. 3

1/11

1. Equilibrium in FX markets K, Ch. 24

1/15-17

2. Dynamics of FX market adjustment K, Ch. 4
a. Fixed exchange rates
b. Fluctuating exchange rates
c. Exchange control
II. Current Account: Trade Theory

1/18,22

A. Supply K, Ch. 5. – handout

1/23-4

B. Demand K, Ch. 6

1/25

C. Trends in Supply and Demand K, Ch. 7

1/29-30

D. Comparative Statics of FX equilibria K, Ch. 9

1/31-2/1

E. Comparative statics of income equilibria K, Ch. 10

2/5

[FIRST] EXAMINATION
III. Current Account: Commercial Policy

2/6,7

A. Tariffs K. 12

2/8

B. Selected alternative devices Handout
IV. Capital Account

2/12

A. Short-term capital movements K, Ch. 17

2/13-14

B. Private and public lending K, Ch. 19

2/15,19

C. Direct investment K, Ch. 20

2/20

D. Capital accounts in the course of development K, Ch. 21
V. Transfers and government assistance

2/21-2

K, Ch. 23

2/25

[SECOND] EXAMINATION
VI. Disequilibria and adjustment mechanisms

2/27

A. Reprise on equilibrium K, Ch. 24

2/28, 3/1,5

B. Types of disequilibria and related adjustment K, Ch. 28

3/12

FINAL EXAMINATION, 8-10 A.M.

____________________________

Exercise in Balance of Payments Accounting

Economics B-60
DUE: JANUARY 18

Winter, 1962
January 11, 1962

From the information that follows, construct a balance of payments statement for the U.S. for the month of January, 1962, during all these transactions take place. Write out the statement showing both debits and credits, as well as the net figures, classified in the format used in Table 2.2 of the text. In addition, provide a memorandum note justifying each of your entries.

Transactions

  1. An American clothing manufacturer buys $5000 worth of English tweed for suiting, paying with a ninety-day draft on the sterling account of his own American commercial bank.
  2. An American automobile dealer buys $10,000 worth of English Ford carss from a distributor in New York, paying to the distributor’s bank in New York.
  3. An individual American buys a Rolls-Royce for delivery in England, paying in advance with a check in dollars to the English dealer, in the amount of $6,000.
  4. An American electric power producer contracts to purchase an electric generator costing $100,000 from an English engineering firm, with delivery to be made in June. A down payment of $100,000 is made in dollars to the New York account of the British firm.
  5. An English appliance dealer buys American refrigerators worth $25,000, paying with dollars purchased fron its English bank.
  6. An English film distributer rents a Hollywood film for £10,000, paying the sterling into the English account of the Holywood producer.
  7. An American sugar broker sells a ninety day future on Cuban sugar to a British importer for $15,000, taking payment in dollars from the New York account of the importer.
  8. An English steel making consortium pays its current share, $100,000, into a dollar account to help defray the expenses of a new mining venture. $50,000 is provided out of the group’s own dollar holdings, and the rest is purchased from the dollar holdings of British banks.
  9. An American investor buys 90-day British treasury bills on the London market with £5,000 bought in New York banks and £10,000 bought from London banks.
  10. The British Exchequer makes a special repayment of lend-lease debt of $100,000 by turning over earmarked gold in New York.
  11. An American bank decreases its hedged working balances in London by $50,000.
  12. An Englishman receives, in England, interest coupons worth $1,000, showing accumulated interest on part of his holding of U.S, railroad bonds. He discounts them with his bank.

____________________________

NOTES ON THE
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROBLEM

Economics B-60

January 24, 1962
Mr. Harwitz

Apparently standard errors

  1. Impors and exports are recorded as they clear ports. Thus, the Rolls-Royce represents an increase in assets owned abroad by Americans, not an import. A similar remark holds for the signing of the generator contract. Such timing errors should not throw the Balance of Payments out of balance, but they should affect the accuracy of your division between the current and the capital accounts.
  2. There was a very clear correlation between working out a careful debit and credit account for each transaction and getting a consistent set of accounts. The resulting accounts might, of course, differ from mine on grounds of interpretation or timing. But they would balance.
  3. Misuse of “errors and omissions” account. This account is non-zero only because reporting in the real world does not cover both ends of every transaction. Since both ends of every transaction were given to you, it should have been clear that no balancing account was necessary.

The Balance of Payments Exercise

I shall indicate how each of the transactions should be handled, and then draw up the resulting accounts. There are no errors and omissions, so there will be no such entry in the accounts. (-) means debit and (+) means credit.

  1. The purchase of tweed is an import, and therefore a debit, and the matching credit is an increase in U.S. obligations abroad, a capital inflow. The inflow would be cancelled, and replaced by a credit arising from a decrease in U.S. assets abroad, when the draft is actually cashed at the importer’s bank.

Import: – $5000
Increase in s/t liabilities to abroad: + $5000

  1. There are two alternative ways to treat this transaction. The first is to assume that the distributor is an American firm, in which case the transaction is purely internal to the U.S. if the cars have already been brought into New York by the distributor. The second is to assume that the distributor is British, and that the American buyer is taking delivery in New York, or, equivalently, that the American buyer is placing an order that actually required an import by the distributor doing business in New York. In my own accounts, I shall use the first (lazy man’s) interpretation, but the second, if used, would lead to:

Import:  -$10,000
Increase in s/t liabilities to abroad: + $10,000

  1. Since the Rolls has not crossed the border of the U.S., the appropriate debit entry is an increase in U.S. assets abroad. The matching credit entry is an increase in s/t liabilities to abroad (the increase in British holdings of U.S. dollars).

Increase in s/t assets abroad: – $6000
Increase in s/t liabilities to abroad: + $6,000

  1. There was an error in my original typescript, and the total cost of the machinery should have read $1,000,000, not $100,000 as it did. I don’t think this affects the balance of payments very seriously, however. I would be inclined to treat this transaction as made up of an increase in a l/t assets abroad (consisting of the paid-up portion of the contract) and a matching credit arising from an increase in British holdings of U.S. dollars. Thus

Increase in l/t assete abroad: – $100,000
Increase in s/t liabilities to abroad: + $100,000

One could argue, however, that with the correct cost figure the entry should be an increase in l/t assets abroad of $1,000,000, with a matching credit entry of $1,000,000, arising 10% from an increase in British holdings of dollars and 90% from the contractual promise to pay the remaining $900,000.

  1. This transaction is perfectly simple. The export is a credit, and the matching debit is a decrease in s/t liabilities to abroad, which arises from the “repatriation” of U.S. dollars.

Export: +25,000
Decrease in s/t liabilities to abroad: -$25,000

  1. The export of sevices is a credit, and the matching debit is an increase in U.S. assets abroad (in this case an increase in American ownership of English pounds), that is, a capital outflow.

Export of services: +$28,000
Increase in s/t assets abroad: – $28,000

Here, as elsewhere in the exercise, I convert figures in pounds sterling into dollars at the official rate of $2.80/£.

  1. Here, a short-tern foreign asset of the U.S. (a claim for future delivery of non-U.S. sugar) is sold, giving rise to a credit. The matching debit is the decrease in foreign-owned U.S. government liabilities.

Decrease in s/t U.S. assets abroad: + $15,000
Decrease in s/t liabilities to abroad:  – $15,000

  1. There are two alternatives here. The first is to assume that the dollar account of the consortium or joint venture is held in the U.S. In this case, the debit entry is a decrease in dollar holdings abroad ($50,000 held by banks, $50,000 held in private banking accounts by members of the consortium), matching a $100,000 increase in U.S. liabilities to abroad. The liabilities are short-term if the joint venture is a U.S. corporation giving shares for the $100,000 payment. I take this alternative, with the second interpretation. The second alternative is to assume that the dollar account is actually held in London. The transaction then washes out of the U.S. Balance of Payments, being only a transfer of continuing U.S. obligations between foreign owners. On my interpretation, the transaction is recorded thus:

Increase in l/t liabilities to abroad: + $100,000
Decrease in s/t liabilities to abroad: – $100,000

  1. The increase ih assets abroad (a capital inflow) is a debit, valued at $42,000 at the official exchange rate. The matching credits are the decrease in U.S. holdings of pounds sterling ($14,000) and an increase in U.S. obligations to abroad ($28,000 in dollars acquried by British banks).

Increase in s/t assets abroad: – $42,000
Decrease in s/t assets abroad: + $14,000
Increase in s/t Iiabilities to abroad: +28,000

  1. The debit entry is clear: an inflow of monetary gold to the U.S. The matching credit entry is perhaps a little artificial, but the standard procedure would, I think, be a decrease in foreign l/t liabilities (Lend-Lease debts) to the U.S.

Decrease in l/t assets abroad: + $100,000
Import of Monetary Gold: – $100,000

  1. This transaction washes out, since it involves a spot sale of pounds worth $50,000, a sale that would be used to fulfill the futures contract for delivery of pounds. That is the meaning of a “decrease in hedged balances”. I chose not to record it, but if it were recorded it would give rise to a credit from the acquisition of dollars and a debit from the fulfillment of the futures contract.
  2. The interest payment is itself a debit, and enters the current account. The matching credit is the increase in dollar obligations owned abroad (in this instance by the British bank).

Interest payment_ – $1,000
Increase in s/t liabilities to abroad: +$1,000

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

THE U.S. BALANCE OF PAYMENTS (Cf. K, Table 2.2)

Transaction Number
A. Goods and services + $47,000
1,2. Merchandise exports + $53,000 5,6
Merchandise imports –  $ 5,000 1
6. Investment income: debits –  $ 1,000 12
C. Capital and Monetary Gold – $47,000
11,15. Long-term liabilities + $100,000
(Other + $100,000) 8
12, 16. Short-term liabilities -0- 1,3,4,5,7,8,9,12
13, 17. Long-term assets -0-
(U.S. Govt loans repaid + $100,000) 10
(Other Private and banks – $100,000) 4
14, 18. Short-term assets – $47,000
(Private and banks) – $47,000) 3,6,7,9
19. Monetary Gold – $100,000 10
Net errors and omissions -0-

Notes to the Balance of Payments Table

The lines in parenthesis are subtotals, and should not be counted in checking to see that the addition and subtraction are correct. A simple check on the accuracy of the presentation (one that will not work all the time) is to note that each transaction number appears exactly twice. In general, the transaction numbers would appear at least twice, and in any case never only once.

____________________________

FIRST HOUR EXAMINATION

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Economics B-60
International Trade

February 7, 1962
Mr. Harwitz

Directions, notes, and hints. Please write on every other page of your blue books, to make marking the examinations easier for me. The total time allowed is 50 minutes, and the set of True-False questions should take twelve minutes. The point count of the questions is the suggested number of minutes. Answer all the true-false questions and two of the remaining four; that is, answer five questions in all. If you answer more than two of the last four questions, I shall choose two of the answers arbitrarily and mark you on them.

If I ask you to comment In detail, I mean that you should set out an explicit theoretical model on which to base your answer. The point of the question, obviously, is to test whether you can handle the theory. In answering the true-false questions, your explanation can be kept to a couple of sentences at most. Be very careful in reading these questions!

  1. True-False. Mark true or false, and explain your choice briefly. (12 minutes)
    1. Multiple exchange rates are prevented by arbitrage because arbitrageurs take long positions in foreign currencies.
    2. Interest arbitrage between two countries (say, the U.S. and Great Britain) serves to keep short-term interest rates in New York and London from diverging.
    3. The very large size of the hedged balances of foreign exchange held by banks as working balances introduces a possible element of instability in the foreign exchange market.
  2. Answer two of the following four questions. They all weigh equally.
    1. “One trouble with the theory of international trade is that it puts too much emphasis on one blade of the Marshallian scissors — the supply side — by trying to determine the direction of trade solely in terms of comparative costs.” Comment in detail.
    2. “The idea that trade will take place between two countries because trading will benefit the countries as a whole is clearly wrong, since trade really takes place between individual firms, regardless of whether or not the countries of which the firns are residents benefit from the individual trading.” Comment in detail, using the concept of the production-possibility locus.
    3. An underdevloped country that trades on an international gold standard undertakes a development project (say, a road-building program) with the aid of an IBRD loan covering the direct foreign exchange requirements of the program. Show what is likely to happen to the balance of trade on current account and to the gold reserves of the country. (Certain assumptions have to be made. Make then explicitly!)
    4. The Phillipines have just gone on a freely-fluctuating exchange rate. Suppose a direct competitor in sales of tropical food crops to the United States (say, Panama) produces a bumper crop, which the competitor cannot store and must try to sell immediately. What happens to the balance of trade and the foreign exchange rates of the Phillipines? (Hints: you can make things easier for you and for me if you restrict your attention to the Phillipines and the United States. Again, certain assumptions need to be made explicitly.

____________________________

SECOND HOUR EXAMINATION

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Economics B-60
International Trade

February 28, 1962
Mr. Harwitz

Directions. Please write on every other page of the blue books.

  1. Short answer questions. Answer 6 of the following 8 questions. Each question is worth four points.
    1. Show that an import of goods on current account, taken by itself, will in fact reduce the domestic money supply of the importing country. (HINT: examine the effect of payment for the transaction on the balance sheet of the domestic banking system.)
    2. Show that an increase in the forward exchange rate between dollars and pounds, with the short-term interest rates in the U.S. and Great Britain fixed, will cause a rise in the current spot rate.
    3. “The fact that Nigeria had a large export surplus vis-a-vis Great Britain during World War II, and that the sterling proceeds of the surplus were blocked in British banks, meant that Nigeria did less domestic investing during that period than she might otherwise have done.” True or false, and why?
    4. Why would a “successful” protective tariff be a poor revenue tariff? (Please draw a picture illustrating the point.)
    5. Under what circumstances may one country in a 2-country world increase its share of the gains from trade by the imposition of an import tariff?
    6. Back in the dear dead days of the “dollar shortage” (the late 1940’s), it was suggested that Europe was justified in imposing tariffs or quotas against American goods because the United States had an advantage in every line of production as a result of the War. What’s wrong with the suggestion?
    7. Define a “beggar-thy-neighbor” tariff policy, and show the effects of such a policy on the country imposing the tariff.
    8. “The protective effect of a tariff is independent of the elasticity of domestic demand in the country imposing the tariff.” True or false, and why?
  1. Medium-long answers. Answer 2 of the following 3 questions. Each question is worth 13 points.
    1. It is not unreasonable to argue that any effect achievable by means of a tariff could equally well be achieved by means of a subsidy for import-competing industries. (a) Is this always true? (b) What in fact is the basis of the argument if and when it is true?
    2. Suppose that in 1946 the U.S. decided to lend Great Britain $50,000,000 to help the British recover from the destruction of its capital stock consequent upon World War II. What criteria should be applied for deciding whether the loan should be in the form of capital goods or in the form of dollars that could be used to finance imports of either capital goods or consumer goods? (Assume in this case a 2-country world.) What application does this kind of argument have in evaluating the usefulness of our present policy of embargoing trade in strategic materials with the Communist bloc, while allowing free trade in “non-strategic materials”?
    3. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of direct investment versus long-term lending from the point of view of the receiving country.

____________________________

FINAL EXAMINATION

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Economics B-60
International Trade

March 12, 1962
Mr. Harwitz

Instructions. Please write on every other page of your blue books, as usual. The point count on the questions is equal to the suggested time you should take to answer them, As before, I shall choose the appropriate number of answers and grade you on them in sections where you answer more questions than I ask you to.

I. Definitions. Answer 10 of the following 15. (3 minutes each)
Note an example or draw a picture if it seems helpful.

    1. Foreign trade multipliers.
    2. Elasticity optimism and pessimism.
    3. Hedging function of the foreign exchange market.
    4. Exchange control system.
    5. Errors and omissiors in the balance of payments accounts.
    6. Bill of exchange.
    7. Gold sterilization.
    8. Protective effect of a tariff.
    9. Revenue effect of tariff.
    10. Redistibutive effect of a tariff.
    11. Balance of trade.
    12. Multilateral exchange clearing.
    13. Interest arbitrage.
    14. Multiple cross rates.
    15. Purchasing power parity.

II. Answer one of the following two. (10 minutes.)

    1. (a) Show that the excess demand for foreign currency is exactly equal to the excess of imports over exports when there are no autonomous movements in capital or gold.
      (b) Define the excess demand for foreign currency when there may be autonomous movements on capital account. What is the effect on the domestic money supply of positive excess demand for foreign currency?
    2. In current terminology, the United States Balance of Payments is said to be in deficit condition if there are compensating outflows of gold or inflows of capital. Show that this can happen even if the balance of trade is in surplus condition on the usual definition. Relate this to the U.S. experience in the last decade.

III. Answer one of the following two. (15 minutes)

    1. F. P. Graham has argued that reciprocal demand has no influence on the relative prices of internationally traded commodities. In the context of a 2-country, 2-good, constant-opportunity-cost model, he is right in the special circumstance that one country is exceedingly large relative to the other. Show why, and show why this may be considered a rather special case.
    2. One can characterize naive comparative cost doctrine as saying that factor endowments determine the goods that a country will import and those it will export. Sophisticated doctrine, like mine, says that a country will export goods the prices of which are relatively lower before trade (in isolation) in the potential exporting country than they are in the potential importer.

IV. Answer one of the following two. (15 minutes)

    1. It has been argued that an examination of the historical evidence indicates that the 19th century adjustment mechanism under the gold standard was not the classical price-specie-flow mechanism. Indicate another mechanism under which the draining-off of gold in a deficit country and the build-up of gold reserves in a surplus country would give rise to an equilibrating counter-flow of capital items[?] in the balance of payments and/or a shift in the determinants of the balance of trade in the equilibrating direction.
    2. (a) Define the term “gold points” (or the equivalent “gold-import and gold-export points”).
      (b) What is the effect on the U.S. gold points if the Treasury imposes a charge for the conversion of goid into currency and vice-versa?
      (c) Keynes proposed, in the Treatise on Money (Vol. II, Ch. 34, Sec. iii), that it would be useful for a country that wished to isolate its domestic money market as much as possible from the repercussions of international situations to introduce a wide spread between the gold points. Precisely what do you think he meant, and in what way do you think the proposal would accomplish its purpose? What combination of adjustment mechanisms did he apparently have in mind?

V. Answer one of the following two, (15 minutes)

    1. Quote from Mr. Louis d’Or, president of the Mercantile Bank of Upper Lower: “The United States would be much healthier economically if, like Germany, she competed hard in international markets, kept inflation down, and built up a healthy surplus in the balance of trade. Right now, the country is in bad shape as an international competitor because of the spend-thrift policies of the current” Is Louis right about Germany being healthy or about the desirability of the U.S. getting like Germany (economically, that is)? Comment in detail on the logic, the definitions, the facts.
    2. Quote from T. Tock, president of the Worthless Watch Company, Waltham, Massachusetts: “I don’t approve of this Unamerican (spelling?) scheme of direct subsidies to business. All we watchmakers want and need is a chance to compete on even terms with the cheap foreign labor. A small, scientific tariff will do for us. That’s the best way.” Is it? Yes or no, why, and from who’s point of view?

VI. Answer one of the following two.
(15 minutes)

    1. A not entirely accurate description of the English international trade position of the early 1920’s would suggest that she had structural unemployment in one of her most important export industries, shipbuilding. At that time, Mr. Churchill re-established the gold standard at the pre-war par, which was in effect an appreciation of the pound relative to other currencies. Evaluate the decision in terms of the remedies appropriate to structural disequilibrium in the export industries. Justify the remedies you say are appropriate, of course.
    2. Consider a case in which there are 2 goods, 2 factors, and 2 countries. One of the countries is relatively well endowed with capital, the other relatively well endowed with labor. Furthermore, the capital-rich country is running a continuing trade surplus with the other country, which is underdeveloped (of course), and is lending to the underdeveloped country on a regular basis. Classical theory then leads to the conclusion that, eventually, trade between the two countries must cease, as the endowment of capital in the underdeveloped country is sufficiently increased. Comment in detail.

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Robert W. Clower Papers, Box 4, Folder “B-60. International Trade Exams, 1962.”

Image Source: Pierre S. DuPont High School senior portrait of Mitchell Harwitz in the yearbook Pierrian 1950.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Transportation

Harvard. Enrollment and exam for Economics of Transportation. Ripley, 1908-1909

Transportation was an applied field located within the intersection of industrial organization, government regulation, and corporate finance. William Zebina Ripley’s teaching portfolio at Harvard also included labor and industrial relations. 

__________________________

Monographs/Books on Transportation by W. Z. Ripley

TransportationChapter from the Final report of the U.S. Industrial Commission (Vol. XIX) and privately issued by the author for the use of his students and others. Washington, D.C., 1902.

Railway Problems, edited with an introduction by William Z. Ripley (Boston: Ginn & Company, 1907).

Railroads: Rates and Regulation (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1912).

Railroads: Finance & Organization (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1915).

__________________________

Earlier exams etc. for Economics 5 (Economics of Transportation), etc.

1900-01 (Hugo Richard Meyer alone)
1901-02 (Ripley with Hugo Richard Meyer)
1903-04 (Ripley alone)
1904-05 (Ripley with Stuart Daggett)
1905-06 (Ripley with Stuart Daggett)
1906-07 (Ripley with Stuart Daggett and Walter Wallace McLaren)
1907-08 (Ripley with Stuart Daggett)

….etc.

1906-07. Ec 17. Railroad Practice (Dr. Stuart Daggett)
1907-08. Ec 17. Railroad Practice (Dr. Stuart Daggett)

 ____________________________

Course Enrollment
1908-09

Economics 5 1hf. Professor Ripley, assisted by Mr. [probably, Edmund Thorton] Miller. — Economics of Transportation.

Total 135: 1 Graduate, 34 Seniors, 57 Juniors, 32 Sophomores, 5 Freshmen, 6 Others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1908-1909, p. 68.

 ____________________________

ECONOMICS 51
Mid-year Examination, 1908-09

  1. (Counts for three questions.)
    The subjoined diagram shows the location and mileage of various places in Ohio and Michigan.

Traffic may move from A to D by several routes: viz.,
over A B D (two routes between B and D, as shown on map), over A B C D, and over A B C E D. Traffic may move from A to E likewise by several routes: viz., A B C E and A B C D E. As shown by the map, there is no direct route from B to E.
Shippers of ice at A on the diagram complain that rates from A to E by all routes are $1 per hundredweight, while the rate from A to D is only eighty cents. Formerly the rates from A to both E and D were the same: viz., $1.25.

    1. Was the former equality of rates from A to D and E any fairer than the present situation? If so, explain why.
    2. Is Springfield injured by the lower rate to D? Explain fully. Does this condition of affairs constitute a violation of the Long and Short Haul clause, as finally construed?
    3. Is there any remedy to suggest?
  1. What is the present status of the Gould system of railroads by comparison with other properties?
  2. What are the objections to issues of short-term notes by railroads? Describe recent conditions.
  3. What additions to the present Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, have been suggested? State both sides of the argument in each case.
  4. How do matters stand at present with respect to the powers of the Federal Commissions in securing testimony? Compare with condition in 1900, as described in the Report of the United States Industrial Commission.
  5. Describe the various sources of information utilized in the preparation of your report; stating what you could and could not find in each of the authorities consulted. For instance, what data are given the Statistics of Railways published by the Interstate Commerce Commission?
  6. What feature of the Annual Report of the Interstate Commerce Commission which you read seemed to you most noteworthy?

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examination Papers, 1873-1915. Box 8, Bound vol. Examination Papers 1908-09; Papers Set for Final Examinations in History, Government, Economics,…,Music in Harvard College (June, 1909), pp. 35-36.

Image Source: Buster Keaton in “The General” (1926). If you want a mugshot of Professor William Z. Ripley go here.

 

Categories
Economists Harvard Public Finance

Harvard. Application for PhD candidacy. Arthur Smithies, PhD 1935

After having received his Philosophy, Politics and Economics B.A. from Oxford as a Tasmanian Rhodes Scholar, Arthur Smithies entered the graduate program in economics at Harvard in 1932. Between the biographical bookends of this post, you will find the records of Smithies’ graduate education kept by the Division of History, Government, and Economics.

Smithies-related posts at Economics in the Rear-view Mirror include material from his courses.

_______________________

Best biographical sketch

A. J. Hagger, “Arthur Smithies (1907-1981)” in the Australian Dictionary of Biography (Vol. 18, 2012).

Good morning Vietnam

On Smithies’ work on economic development policy in South Vietnam for the Agency for International Development, CIA and Institute for Defense Analysis:

Seth M. Kupferberg, “An Academic in the War” in The Harvard Crimson (May 23, 1975).

_______________________

A Memorial Statement by
Harvard President Derek C. Bok
March 1982

ARTHUR SMITHIES, Nathaniel Ropes Professor of Political Economy, Emeritus, died on September 9, 1981 at the age of 74. An early Keynesian economist and authority on fiscal policy, he came to Harvard in 1948 as Professor of Economics, having taught at the University of Michigan, Oxford, and the Australian National University. He also served the U.S. government in a number of capacities during World War II for the Bureau of the Budget and the Fiscal Analysis Branch of the Economic Cooperation Administration, among others. Later, the government bodies he assisted would include the Agency for International Development. He was elected Harvard’s Ropes Professor in 1957. A most popular faculty member and teacher, he was an influential chairman of the economics department twice in the 1950s and well-loved Master of Kirkland House from 1965 to 1974. He wrote continuously and served as editor for the Quarterly Journal of Economics and the Journal of Economic Abstracts. His 1948 book, The Federal Budget and Fiscal Policy, remained a standard text for 20 years. A colleague [John Kenneth Galbraith] said Mr. Smithies believed a sense of history made the difference between a good economist and an inferior one. His own caused him in the latter years of his career to move his major interest from federal fiscal policy to the economic problems of developing countries. A native of Tasmania, he earned degrees from its University and Oxford, and the Ph.D. from Harvard.

SourceReport of the President of Harvard College, 1980-81, pp. 40-41.

_______________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DIVISION OF HISTORY, GOVERNMENT, AND ECONOMICS

Application for Candidacy for the Degree of Ph.D.

[Note: Boldface used to indicate printed text of the application; italics used to indicate the handwritten entries]

I. Full Name, with date and place of birth.

Arthur Smithies. 12 December 1907, Hobart Tasmania.

II. Academic Career: (Mention, with dates inclusive, colleges or other higher institutions of learning attended; and teaching positions held.)

University of Tasmania 1925-1929
Magdalen College Oxford 1929-1932
Harvard 1932—

III. Degrees already attained. (Mention institutions and dates.)

L.L.B. University of Tasmania
B.A. (Philosophy Politics Economics), Oxford

IV. General Preparation. (Indicate briefly the range and character of your under-graduate studies in History, Economics, Government, and in such other fields as Ancient and Modern Languages, Philosophy, etc. In case you are a candidate for the degree in History, state the number of years you have studied preparatory and college Latin.)

[Left blank]

V. Department of Study. (Do you propose to offer yourself for the Ph.D., “History,” in “Economics,” or in “Political Science”?)

Economics

VI. Choice of Subjects for the General Examination. (State briefly the nature of your preparation in each subject, as by Harvard courses, courses taken elsewhere, private reading, teaching the subject, etc., etc.)

  1. Economic Theory.
    at Oxford & Economics 11 & 15 at Harvard
  2. Money and Banking
    at Oxford & Economics 38 at Harvard
  3. International Trade
    at Oxford & Economics 39 at Harvard
  4. Statistics
    Economics 41A & 41B at Harvard
  5. [Added later] (Jurisprudence) Satisfied by work at Univ. Tasmania. Degree LLB. Smithies first man in his class) H.H. Burbank
  6. [Added later] Economic Theory 

VII. Special Subject for the special examination.

Economic Theory

VIII. Thesis Subject. (State the subject and mention the instructor who knows most about your work upon it.)

[Added later]  Aspects of Theory of Production

IX. Examinations. (Indicate any preferences as to the time of the general and special examinations.)

[Left blank]

X. Remarks

[Added later] Economic History requirement satisfied by work at Oxford.
Smithies has a preparation sufficiently broad to warrant the acceptance of this program.

[Committee for General Examination] Profs. Taussig, Leontief, Harris, Crum
[Committee for Special Examination] Profs. Taussig, Schumpeter, Leontief

Signature of a member of the Division certifying approval of the above outline of subjects.

[signed] H. H. Burbank

*   *   *   [Last page of application] *   *   *

[Not to be filled out by the applicant]

Name: Arthur Smithies

Approved: May 28, 1933 [Added later]  Sept. 11, 1933

Ability to use French certified by Dr. A. E. Monroe, March 3, 1933.

Ability to use German certified by  Dr. A. E. Monroe, March. 3, 1933.

Date of general examination Friday, May 19, 1933. Passed. F.W.T.

Thesis received April 30, 1934.

Read by Professors Taussig and Schumpeter.

Approved May 18, 1934.

Date of special examination Friday, June 1, 1934. Passed F.W.T.

Recommended for the Doctorate February 6, 1935

Degree conferred Mid-years, 1935

Remarks.  [left blank]

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Partial transcript of Arthur Smities in the
Graduate School of Arts and Sciences

1932-33
Economics 11 (1 course) A minus (mid-year grade)
Economics 151 (½ course) A plus
Economics 38 (1 course) A (mid-year grade)
Economics 41a1 (½ course) B
Economics 41b2 (½ course) now taking
Economics 392 (½ course) now taking

A.B. Univ. of Oxford, England, 1932.
Commonwealth Fund Fellow, 1932-33.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Proposed change in Mr. Smithies’ plan: [undated]

  1. Economic Theory
  2. Money & Banking
  3. Statistics
  4. Jurisprudence
  5. Economic History (course credit). Course taken at Oxford
  6. Economic theory.

(Professor Taussig wishes to examine him in Jurisprudence)

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

General examination,
Departmental Report

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS
Report on Examinations for Graduate Degrees

Name of Candidate: Arthur Smithies

Date of Examination: May 19, 1933

Fields Examined: Economic Theory, Money and Banking, Statistics, Jurisprudence

The Committee certified that the General Examination of the candidate was

Excellent
Good
Fair
Unsatisfactory

Committee:

F. W. Taussig
W. L. Crum
S. E. Harris
W. W. Leontief

[signed] F. W. Taussig Chairman

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

General examination passed

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

Cambridge, Massachusetts
May 22, 1933

Dear Professor Wilson:

As chairman of the committee for the general examination of Arthur Smithies I beg to report that the candidate passed the examination. The committee certifies that his showing was good, and I would add that on two of the subjects it was better than good. On no subject was it in any way unsatisfactory.

Very truly yours,
[signed]
F. W. Taussig

Professor G. G. Wilson
15 Little Hall
Cambridge, Massachusetts

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Special examination,
Division Report

DIVISION OF HISTORY, GOVERNMENT, AND ECONOMICS
Report on Examinations for Graduate Degree

Name of Candidate: Arthur Smithies

Date of Examination: Friday, June 1, 1934, in 42 Holyoke House, at 4.

Department of Economics

Fields Examined: Economic Theory (special field)

The Committee certified that the General Special Examination of the candidate was

Excellent
Good
Fair
Failed, no bar to re-examination
Failed, recommended not to request re-examination

Committee: Professors Taussig (chairman), Leontief, and Schumpeter

Further comments may be made below.

Mr. Smithies’ examination confirmed the high opinion about him and his work which resulted from his thesis and his initiative in research

[signed] F. W. Taussig
Chairman

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Certificate of completed thesis
apparently misplaced

Mr. Smithies’ Certificate (for the thesis) has slipped away, and will have to be put in, with the proper signatures, when recovered.

[Handwritten note by Professor Frank W. Taussig]

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Source: Harvard University Archives. Division of History, Government & Economics. PhD. Candidates Receiving Degrees in 1935-1936, Box 15.

__________________________

Course Names and Instructors (1932-33)

Economics 11
Economic Theory
Prof. William F. Taussig
Economics 151
Problems in Economic Theory
Prof. Joseph A. Schumpeter
Economics 38
Principles of Money and Banking
Professors John H. Williams
and Joseph A. Schumpeter
Economics 41a1
Theory of Economic Statistics I
Prof. William L. Crum
and Asst. Prof. Edwin Frickey
Economics 41b2
Theory of Economic Statistics II
Prof. William L. Crum
and Asst. Prof. Edwin Frickey
Economics 392
International Trade and Finance
Prof. Wassily Leontief

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College 1932-33 , pp. 65-67.

__________________________

Arthur Smithies
Timeline of his life and career

1907. Born December 12 at Lindisfarne, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Attended Hutchins School in Hobart, Tasmania

1928. Won the James Backhouse Walker prize for proficiency, University of Tasmania.

1929. LL.B. University of Tasmania

1929-32. Tasmanian Rhodes Scholar, Magdalen College, Oxford University.

1932. B.A., Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Magdalen College, Oxford University.

1932-34. Commonwealth Fund Fellow and Harkness Fellow, Harvard University.

1934-35. Economics Instructor, University of Michigan.

1935. Ph.D., Harvard University. Thesis: Aspects of the Theory of Production.
[While the dissertation and special examination had been accepted/passed in June 1934,  the Ph.D. was awarded at mid-year 1934-35.]

1935. Married Katharine Ripman, February 22. Three children.

1935-38. Assistant-economist to (Sir) Roland Wilson in the Commonwealth Bureau of Census and Statistics, Canberra.

1938-43. Assistant, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Michigan.

1943-48. Economist, chief of economic section, U.S. Bureau of the Budget.

1948. The Federal Budget and Fiscal Policy. “…regarded as the standard work in the field for two decades” (Otto Eckstein).

1948-49. Director of Fiscal and Trade Policy Division, Economic Cooperation Administration.

1948-74. Professor of Economics, Harvard University.

1950-55. Chairman of the economics department, Harvard University.

1951-52. Economic adviser to the Office of Defense Mobilization.

1954. Hoover Commission Task Force.

1954. “Economic Welfare and Policy”, one of the Brookings Lectures published as Economics and Public Policy, 1955.

1955. The Budgetary Process in the United States.

1955-56. John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Fellow and visiting professor, Oxford University.

1957-78. Nathanial Ropes Professor of Political Economy, Harvard University.

1957-65. Editor of the Quarterly Journal of Economics.

1959-61. Chairman of the economics department, Harvard University.

1962. Founder of the Journal of Economic Abstracts.

1962-63. Visiting professor, Australian National University.

1963. Lecture delivered at the University of Queensland, St. Lucia on September 13, published by The English, Scottish and Australian Bank as Economic Stability in Australia.

1965-74. Master of Kirkland House, Harvard University.

1978. Retired from Harvard, Professor Emeritus.

1981. Suffering a heart attack at the Cambridge Boat Club after rowing on the Charles River, Smithies died September 9 in Mt. Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Timeline sources: A. J. Hagger, “Arthur Smithies (1907-1981)” in the Australian Dictionary of Biography (Vol. 18, 2012); Obituary in the Boston Globe, September 11, 1981 (p. 37); Obituary in the Harvard Crimson, September 14, 1981; Who’s Who in America 40th Edition, 1978-79, p. 3041.

Image Source: Arthur Smithies in the Harvard Class Album 1952.

Categories
Brown Economists Harvard

Harvard. Application for PhD candidacy. John H. Williams, PhD 1919

John Henry Williams was in his day a colossus whose feet were squarely planted in macroeconomic research and macroeconomic policy. Many posts here at Economics in the Rear-view Mirror include material from his Harvard courses. The particular contribution of this post is found in the transcriptions of the graduate course records from the Division of History, Government and Economics that document Williams’ own pursuit of the Ph.D. Not essential to any understanding of the development of modern economics is the flurry of letters, cards and telegrams required to coordinate the time of Williams’ Special Examination that followed the acceptance of his doctoral thesis. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

A timeline of his life and career has been appended to the post below.

_______________________

Current Literature

Pier Francesco Asso’s chapter “John Henry Williams (1887–1980)” in The Palgrave Companion to Harvard Economics edited by Robert A. Cord (1924), pp. 197-220.

_______________________

Ph.D. in Economics, 1919

JOHN HENRY WILLIAMS, A.B. (Brown Univ.) 1912, A.M. (Harvard Univ.) 1916.

Subject, Economics. Special Field, International Trade. Thesis, “Argentine International Trade under Inconvertible Paper Money, 1880-1900.” Assistant Professor of Economics, Princeton University.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1918-19, p. 82.

_______________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DIVISION OF HISTORY, GOVERNMENT, AND ECONOMICS

Application for Candidacy for the Degree of Ph.D.

[Note: Boldface used to indicate printed text of the application; italics used to indicate the handwritten entries]

I. Full Name, with date and place of birth.

John Henry Williams. June 21, 1887. Ystrad, Wales.

II. Academic Career: (Mention, with dates inclusive, colleges or other higher institutions of learning attended; and teaching positions held.)

Brown University. 1909-12.
Harvard University. 1915 to present.
Brown University. Instructor in English, 1912-15.

III. Degrees already attained. (Mention institutions and dates.)

A.B. Brown University, 1912.
A.M. Harvard, 1916.

IV. General Preparation. (Indicate briefly the range and character of your undergraduate studies in History, Economics, Government, and in such other fields as Ancient and Modern Languages, Philosophy, etc.)

General course in European history; English Constitutional history; European history since 1815; American history.
Elementary course in Economic Theory; Labor Problems;
Elementary courses in Political Science & in Sociology.
History of Philosophy. English composition (2
 year courses).
Anglo-Saxon; English literature (two year courses); French (two years); German (two years); Latin & Greek (one year each). I obtained credit for a course in Spanish by special examination.

V. Department of Study. (Do you propose to offer yourself for the Ph.D., “History,” in “Economics,” or in “Political Science”?)

Economics.

VI. Choice of Subjects for the General Examination. (State briefly the nature of your preparation in each subject, as by Harvard courses, courses taken elsewhere, private reading, teaching the subject, etc., etc.)

  1. Economic theory, and the history of economic thought.
    Economics 11, Economics 14: – Harvard.
    (Elementary course in theory at Brown.)
  2. Economic history.
    Economics 2: – Harvard.
  3. Public Finance.
    Economics 31: – Harvard.
  4. Labor Problems.
    Economics 34: – Harvard.
    (one course at Brown.)
  5. Political Theory.
    Govt. 6a; Govt 6b: – Harvard.
  6. International Trade. Special Field
    Economics 33.
    Economics 20(a) (Research full course) 

VII. Special Subject for the special examination.

International Trade

VIII. Thesis Subject. (State the subject and mention the instructor who knows most about your work upon it.)

The Foreign Trade of Argentina in the Period of Inconvertible Paper Money (1880-19009.
Professor F. W. Taussig.

IX. Examinations. (Indicate any preferences as to the time of the general and special examinations.)

For the general examination. Early May, 1917.

X. Remarks

[left blank]

Signature of a member of the Division certifying approval of the above outline of subjects.

[signed] Charles J. Bullock

*   *   *   [Last page of application] *   *   *

[Not to be filled out by the applicant]

Name: John Henry Williams

Approved: Jan 23 1917

Ability to use French certified by C. J. Bullock. 18 December 1916 – D.H.

Ability to use German certified by  C. J. Bullock. 18 December 1916 – D.H.

Date of general examination Passed – May 7, 1911 – D.H.

Thesis received [left blank]

Read by [left blank]

Approved [left blank]

Date of special examination [left blank]

Recommended for the Doctorate [left blank]

Degree conferred [left blank]

Remarks.  [left blank]

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Record of JOHN HENRY WILLIAMS
in the Harvard Graduate
School of Arts and Sciences

Grades
1915-16 Course Half-Course
Economics 2a1 A
Economics 2b2 A
Economics 11 A
Economics 13 B plus
Economics 31 A minus
Economics 34 A

 

1916-17 Course Half-Course
Economics 14 “Credit”
Economics 20a A
Economics 332 abs.
Economics 351 A
Government 6a1 A
Government 6b2 abs.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Certification of reading knowledge
of French

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague
W.E. Rappard
H.L. Gray
E. E. Day

Cambridge, Massachusetts
December 18, 1916.

This is to certify that I have examined Mr. J. H. Williams and found that he has a satisfactory reading knowledge of French and German.

[signed]
C. J. Bullock

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

General examination passed

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague
E. E. Day
B. M. Anderson, Jr.

Cambridge, Massachusetts
May 9, 1917.

Dear Haskins:

Mr. J. H. William passed his general examination for the doctor’s degree on May 7th. He did pretty well in all subjects, and the vote of the Committee was unanimous. The examination was not, however, a brilliant one.

Sincerely yours,
[signed]
Charles J. Bullock

Dean C. H. Haskins

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Willing to take a professorship at Lafayette College if offered.

Department of Commerce
Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce
Washington

June 20, 1918

I have your letter of June 17th, forwarded from the Cambridge Y.M.C.A., stating that I have been recommended for a professorship in economics and government at Lafayette College at $2,000. That prospect seems to me highly desirable and I hope I may get it. I am writing today to Dr. MacCracken.

For the past two weeks, as a result of your kind mention of me to Dr. Klein, I have been doing Latin American research work in the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce. My present appointment is temporary and in no way binding on either side. I understand, however, that I may arrange for a permanent appointment if I desire. The salary is about the same as that of the teaching position, but the cost of living here in Washington is terrific! I feel too that I should prefer teaching to this work, provided the salary were satisfactory, as it is in the case of this position at Lafayette College. If, therefore, you could assist me in any way to secure the place, I should be very grateful.

I take this opportunity to explain what is the present status of my thesis. Save for some minor changes it is completed, and is now in Professor Taussig’s hands. He hopes to have an opportunity to read it during his vacation, which I undertand is to begin soon. Once the thesis is returned to me I mean to put it into final shape and forward it to you. Do you not think that it might be examined by a committee in the late summer or early fall, and that, if it is satisfactory, arrangement might be made for me to take the final examination in October?

With many thanks for your kind letter, I am

Very truly yours,
[signed]
John H. Williams

Dean Charles H. Haskins.

(My safest address is the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, Latin American Division, Washington, D.C. I am advising the Appointments Office of this address.)

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Dean Haskins reply to Williams

22 June 1918

Dear Mr. Williams:

I am glad to learn from your letter of 20 June that you are interested in the place at Lafayette. Your letter to President MacCracken will put you in touch with him; I had already given him the only address I conld get, 1937 Calvert Street.

In regards your thesis, I will undertake to see what we can do when it reaches me in final shape. It is hard to find men free to read theses during the summer, but at least it can be read early in the academic year, so that your special examination need not go far into the autumn.

Let me know if I can do anything about the place at Lafayette, or elsewhere. I mentioned Professor Bullock in writing to President MacCracken.

Very truly yours,
[unsigned copy]

Mr. John H. Williams.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Undated File Note
Presumably late June 1918.

Miss Ham has telphoned that J. H. Williams wishes to take his special examination next fall. Professor Taussig has received his thesis and has read it. Who are to be the other members of the committee?

[Handwritten notes added:]
Bullock, Sprague, Klein, Carver.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Division asks Carver
to Read Williams’ thesis

7 October 1918

Dear Carver:

Will you serve as one of the committee to read the Ph.D. thesis of J. H. Williams, on “Foreign Trade of Argentina in the Period of Inconvertible Paper Money (1880-1900)”? The thesis will be sent to you.

Yours sincerely,
[unsigned copy]

Professor T. N. Carver

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Taussig’s Daughter to wed in November 1918. Good time to schedule Williams’ Special Examination

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague
E. E. Day
B. M. Anderson, Jr.
J. S. Davis
H. H. Burbank
E. E. Lincoln

Cambridge, Massachusetts
October 14, 1918.

Dear dear Haskins:

Taussig writes that he is going to be in Cambridge about November 10th to attend his daughter’s wedding, and obviously that will be the best time for having Williams’s final examination. Let us tentatively put that down for November 9th, 10th, or 11th, the exact date to be fixed after the date of the wedding is definitely set.

Williams’s thesis will undoubtedly be accepted. Taussig and I are now ready to approve it, and find it a very excellent piece of work. Carver is now reading it.

Sincerely yours,
[signed]
Charles J. Bullock

Dean C. H. Haskins

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Dean Haskins Begins to Assemble Special Examination Committee

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Division of History, Government, and Economics

16 October 1918

My dear Sir:

Can you serve as a member of the committee for the special examination of John Henry Williams for the Ph.D. in Economics, which is provisionally fixed for November 9 or 11? Mr. Williams’s special field is International Trade, and his thesis subject is Foreign Trade of Argentina in the Period of Inconvertible Paper Money (1880-1900). The committee consists of Professors Taussig (chairman), Bullock, Carver, and Persons.

Yours sincerely,
[unsigned copy]
CHARLES H. HASKINS

[To: Taussig, Bullock, Carver, Persons]

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Division sets tentative dates for
Special Examination

16 October 1918

Dear Mr. Williams:

Your special examination has been fixed provisionally for November 9 or 11. The committee consists of Professors Taussig (chairman), Bullock, Carver, and Persons.

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]

Mr. J. H. Williams.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Division checking whether
Taussig would be available for the Special Examination

16 October 1918

Dear Taussig:

I understand from Bullock that you are to be here these days. Can you indicate so far in advance whether you could act on Williams’s examination and what hour would be convenient for you?

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]

Professor F.W. Taussig.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Persons can serve on
Special Examination Committee

My dear Dean Haskins:

I will be able to serve on the committee to examine J. H. Williams on Nov 9 or 11.

[signed]
Warren M. Persons

Oct. 18–1918

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

UNITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION
WASHINGTON

F. W. Taussig, Chairman
Thomas walker Page, Vice Chairman
David J. Lewis
William Kent
William S. Culbertson
Edward P. Costigan
Wm. M. Steuart, Secretary

Address reply to
United States Tariff Commission

October 18, 1918.

Dear Bullock:

I enclose the certificate on Williams’s thesis, duly signed. I should hope to be able to get to Cambridge about November 12th. I can make no unqualified promises, but just now there is something of a let up, and prospects for an easier year are good.

Sincerely yours,
[signed]
F. W. Taussig

Professor C. J. Bullock,
Department of Economics
Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Enclosure.

[Short-hand note at bottom of page]

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

UNITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION
WASHINGTON

F. W. Taussig, Chairman
Thomas walker Page, Vice Chairman
David J. Lewis
William Kent
William S. Culbertson
Edward P. Costigan
Wm. M. Steuart, Secretary

Address reply to
United States Tariff Commission

October 19, 1918.

Dear Haskins:

I have your letter of the 16th. I could take part in Williams’ examination about November 12th or 13th. It will be a pleasure to have a hand again in Cambridge doings.

Sincerely yours,
[signed]
F. W. Taussig

Mr. Charles H. Haskins,
Harvard University,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Bullock has Taussig’s letter to him
forwarded to Dean Haskins

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague
E. E. Day
B. M. Anderson, Jr.
J. S. Davis
H. H. Burbank

Cambridge, Massachusetts
October 21, 1918.

Dear Dean Haskins:

Professor Bullock wished me to send you the enclosed letter from Professor Taussig, and to suggest that you provisionally set November 12th as the date for Mr. Williams’s examination and find out whether Professor Taussig now can agree to come at that time.

Very truly yours,
[signed]
A. Pauline Ham

Dean C. H. Haskins

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Special Examination Date Change
(to the Committee)

21 October 1918

Dear Bullock:

Mr. Williams’s examination has been changed to Tuesday, November 12, at 3 p.m. I hope that this will be convenient for you.

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]

Professor C. J. Bullock
Professor T. N. Carver
Dr. W. M. Persons.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Special Examination Date Change
(to Williams)

21 October 1918

My dear Mr. Williams:

It has been found necessary to change your examination, and it has been set provisionally for Tuesday, November 12, at 3 p.m.

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]

Mr. John H. Williams.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Special Examination Date Change
(to Taussig)

21 October 1918

Dear Taussig:

I have arranged Mr. Williams’s examination for Tuesday, November 12, at 3 p.m. I hope that hour will be convenient for you.

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]

Professor F. W. Taussig.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Carver agrees to serve on Williams’ Special Examination Committee

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague
E. E. Day
B. M. Anderson, Jr.
J. S. Davis
H. H. Burbank
E. E. Lincoln

Cambridge, Massachusetts
October 22, 1918.

Dean Charles H. Haskins,
Cambridge, Mass.

Dear Sir:

I can serve as a member of the committee for the examination of Mr. Williams on either date, given, preferably on November 9.

Very sincerely yours,
[signed]
T. N. Carver (P)

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Bullock can’t make
the new Special Examination date

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague
E. E. Day
B. M. Anderson, Jr.
J. S. Davis
H. H. Burbank
E. E. Lincoln

Cambridge, Massachusetts
October 23, 1918.

My dear Haskins:

It now appears that I shall be away from Cambridge the week of November 10-16 in attendance at the annual conference of the National Tax Association. Since Taussig is going to be here that week, I think it would be better to adhere to your date of Noverber 12th for Williams’s examination. You have Taussig, Carver, and Persons, so that you could perfectly well replace me by Burbank or some historian or a government man. It is more important that Taussig should be on hand than that I should be there.

Sincerely yours,
[signed]
Charles J. Bullock

Dean C. H. Haskins

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Carver agrees to new date for
Williams’ Special Examination

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague
E. E. Day
B. M. Anderson, Jr.
J. S. Davis
H. H. Burbank
E. E. Lincoln

Cambridge, Massachusetts
October 24, 1918.

Dean Charles H. Haskins,
Cambridge, Mass.

Dear Dean Haskins:

The date for Mr. Williams’s examination, November 12, at 3 p.m. is satisfactory to me.

Very sincerely yours,
[signed]
T. N. Carver

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

UNITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION
WASHINGTON

F. W. Taussig, Chairman
Thomas walker Page, Vice Chairman
David J. Lewis
William Kent
William S. Culbertson
Edward P. Costigan
Wm. M. Steuart, Secretary

Address reply to
United States Tariff Commission

October 24, 1918.

Dear Haskins:

I have your note concerning Williams’ examination on Tuesday, November 12th. I will be on hand.

Very truly yours,
[signed]
F. W. Taussig

Mr. Charles H. Haskins,
Harvard University,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Asking Burbank to substitute for Bullock

25 October 1918

Dear Burbank:

Could you serve as a member of the committee for the special examination of J. H. Williams on Tuesday, November 12, at 3 p.m.? Professor Bullock, who was to serve, is obliged to be out of town that week, and the date of the examination has to be fixed with regard to Professor Taussig’s presence in Cambridge. Mr. Williams’s special field is International Trade, and his thesis is on Foreign Trade in Argentina, 1880-1900. The other members of the committee are Professors Taussig (chairmen), Carver, and Persons.

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]

Dr. H. H. Burbank.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Bullock informed

25 October 1918

Dear Bullock:

I have asked Burbank to serve in your place at Williams’s examination.

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]

Professor C. J. Bullock.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Taussig needs to postpone
the Special Examination

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Dean Agrees to Postponing Special Examination

6 November 1918

Professor F. W. Taussig, U. S. Tariff Commission, Washington, D.C.

Examination can be changed to Friday fifteenth if your presence assured then. Telegraph.

Charles H. Haskins

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Williams informed of Special Examination date change

7 November 1918

Dear Mr. Williams:

It has been found necessary to change your examination to Friday, November 15, at 4 p.m. in Widener U.

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]

Mr. J. H. Williams.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Committee members informed of
Special Examination date change

7 November 1918

My dear Sir:

It has been found necessary to change Mr. Williams’s examination to Friday, November 15, at 4 p.m. in Widener U. I trust this hour will be convenient for you.

Sincerely yours,
[unsigned copy]

[Carver, Persons, Burbank]

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Special examination passed

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

F. W. Taussig
T. N. Carver
W. Z. Ripley
C. J. Bullock
E. F. Gay
W. M. Cole
O. M. W. Sprague
E. E. Day
B. M. Anderson, Jr.
J.S. Davis
H.H. Burbank
E.E. Lincoln

Cambridge, Massachusetts
November 16, 1918.

Dear Sir:

I beg to report, in behalf of the Committee appointed to conduct the special examination of J. H. Williams, that he passed the examination by unanimous vote of the Committee.

Very truly yours,
[signed]
F. W. Taussig

Dean C. H. Haskins

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Notice to President’s Office
of the Award of Ph.D.

[Format matches the listing in the Annual Report of the President of Harvard College]

3 December 1918

The Division of History, Government, and Economics reports that the following candidate for the degree of Doctor of philosophy has presented a satisfactory thesis and passed his final examination successfully:

John Henry Williams,

A.B. (Brown Univ.) 1912, A.M. (Harvard Univ.) 1916.

Subject, Economics. Special Field, International Trade.

Thesis. “The Foreign Trade of Argentina in the Period of Inconvertible paper Money (1880-1900).”

[unsigned copy]
Chairman

Source: Harvard University Archives. Division of History, Government & Economics, Ph.D. 1923-24. (UA V 453.270), Box 05, Folder “Degree Granted”.

__________________________

Course Names and Instructors

1915-16

Economics 2a 1hf. European Industry and Commerce in the Nineteenth Century. Professor Gay assisted by Mr. A.H. Cole and Ryder.

Economics 2b 2hf. Economic and Financial History of the United States. Professor Gay assisted by Mr. A.H. Cole and Ryder.

Economics 11. Economic Theory. Professor Taussig.

Economics 13. Statistics: Theory, Methods, Practice. Asst. Professor Day.

Economics 31. Public Finance. Professor Bullock.

Economics 34. Problems of Labor. Professor Ripley.

1916-17

Economics 14. History and Literature of Economics to the year 1848. Professor Bullock.

Economics 20a. Economic Research (Economic Theory and International Trade and Tariff Problems). Professor Taussig.

Economics 332International Trade and Tariff Problems. Professor Persons (Colorado College).

Economics 351. Problems of Business Cycles. Professor Persons (Colorado College).

Government 6a1. History of Political Theory. Asst. Professor Holcombe.

Government 6b2. Political Theories of Modern Times. Asst. Professor Holcombe.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College for 1915-16, 1916-17.

__________________________

John Henry Williams
Timeline of his life and career

1887. Born June 21 in Ystrad, Wales.

1889. May. Family emigrates to the United States, settling in the Blackinton section of North Adams, Massachusetts.

1900. October 13. Became a naturalized citizen of the United States.

 1908[est.] Graduated from Drury High School, North Adams, Massachusetts.

1912. A.B. Brown University.

1912-15. English instructor at Brown University.

1915. Married Jessie Isabelle Monroe (she died in 1960). Two daughters.

1916. A.M. in economics, Harvard.

1917-18. July to May, Sheldon Travelling Fellow to Buenos Aires.

1918-19. Instructor of Economics. Harvard. Also assistant editor of the Review of Economic Statistics.

1919. Ph.D. in economics, Harvard. Thesis awarded the Wells Prize.

1919. Accompanied Professor Edwin Walter Kemmerer of Princeton University, who was serving as adviser to the Guatemalan government in currency matters, to Guatemala and Cuba. (They departed July 12 from New Orleans). Williams traveled as secretary to Kemmerer.

1919-20. Assistant professor of economics, Princeton University.

1920. Publication of the doctoral thesis, Argentine International Trade Under Inconvertible Paper Money, 1880-1900.

1920-21. Associate Professor of Banking, Northwestern University.

1921-25. Assistant Professor of Economics, Harvard University.

1925-26. Westinghouse professor in Italy.

1925-29. Associate Professor of Economics, Harvard University.

1929-33. Professor of Economics, Harvard University.

1933-57. Nathaniel Ropes Professor of Political Economy, Harvard University.

1932-33. Delegate to the Commission that prepared the World Monetary and Economic Conference.

1933. Spring. Joined the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as Assistant Federal Reserve Agent. Full-time until October 1934.

1936-47. Vice-president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. In charge of the Research Function.

1937-47. First Dean of the Harvard Graduate School of Public Administration.

1944. First edition of Postwar Monetary Plans and Other Essays published. Second edition (1945). Third edition (1947). Fourth edition (1949).

1947-52. Economic Advisor to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

1948-51. Member of the European Cooperation and Administration advisory committee on fiscal and monetary problems.

1951. President of the American Economic Association.

1952-ca.1963. Consultant to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

1953Economic stability in a changing world; essays in economic theory and policy.

1953. One of seven named by President Eisenhower to a commission to study foreign economic policy.

1953-54. Member of the United States Commission on Foreign Economic Policy.

1957. Retires from Harvard University.

1957-63. William L. Clayton Professor of International Economic Affairs at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

1962. Married second wife, Katherine R. McKinstry
[note: she was thanked for her editorial help in preparing the publication of Postwar Monetary Plans and Other Essays (1944); also in Economic stability in a changing world; essays in economic theory and policy (1953)]

1980. December 24. Died in Southbridge, Massachusetts.

Timeline sources: Obituary in North Adams Transcript (Jan 5, 1981), p. 12; FRBNY Quarterly Review (Winter, 1980-81), pp. 1-2Who’s Who in America 1952, p. 2622.

Image Source: Passport picture from John Henry Williams’ passport application July 8, 1919. Low resolution scan enhanced by Economics in the Rear-view Mirror.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Sociology

Harvard. Enrollment and exams for Principles of Sociology. Carver, 1908-1909

Artifacts from a time when Sociology roomed with Economics…at least at Harvard. But make no mistake, economics was paying the rent back in that day.

One presumes the course text was Thomas Nixon Carver’s book of course readings (over 800 pages!): Sociology and Social Progress: A Handbook for Students of Sociology. Boston: Ginn & Company, 1905.

The teaching assistant for the course was Carl William Thompson (1879-1920). After receiving an A.M. from the University of South Dakota in 1903, he added a Harvard A.M. in 1904 where he had an appointment as Assistant in Elocution. He re-entered Harvard graduate school in 1908 as a professor of economics and sociology and director of the School of Commerce at the University of South Dakota, Vermillion. He passed his general exam on June 2, 1909. In his application for candidacy for the Ph.D. he wrote “Am teaching a course in General Sociology this year, based on Carver’s ‘Sociology & Social Progress’, Ward, Spencer etc.” [Source: Harvard University Archives. Division of History, Government & Economics Division Archives. PhD. Material, Box 3, Folder “Ph.D. (illegible)”]. There is no indication that he completed the other requirements for the Ph.D. in his file. From Harvard Thompson was the director of the bureau of research in agricultural economics and associate professor of economics at the University of Minnesota. In May 1913 he accepted a position in the rural organization service of the U.S. department of agriculture. He died of influenza in 1920.

__________________________

Sociology exams from earlier years.

1901-02 (taught by T. N. Carver)

1902-03 (taught by T. N. Carver and W. Z. Ripley)

1903-04 (taught by T. N. Carver)

1904-05 (taught by T. N. Carver and J. A. Field) Includes the reading list for the course and additional biographical information.

1905-06 (taught by T. N. Carver)

1906-07 (taught by J. A. Field)

1907-08 (taught by T. N. Carver)

__________________________

Course Enrollment
1908-09

Economics 3. Professor Carver, assisted by Mr. Thompson. — Principles of Sociology. Theories of Social Progress.

Total 42: 7 Graduates, 4 Seniors, 21 Juniors, 4 Sophomores, 6 Others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1908-1909, p. 68.

__________________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 3

Mid-year Examination, 1908-09
  1. Can social progress be defined in terms of human well-being and, at the same time, in terms of the universal evolutionary process? Explain.
  2. Are human interests harmonious as antagonistic, and what is the relation of this question to the problem of evil?
  3. How does military life, in different stages of social development, operate as a factor in human selection.
  4. What are some of the leading factors tending toward, (a) race improvement, (b) race deterioration, at the present time in the United States?
  5. Discuss the probable future of ceremonial institutions as described by Spencer.
  6. How does the transition from the militant to the industrial type of society affect the status of women?
  7. Trace briefly the historical relationship among the leading professions, as set forth by Spencer.
  8. Discuss briefly, territory, race, creed, and occupation, as bases of group consciousness, together with some of the results of each special form of group consciousness.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University. Mid-year Examinations, 1852-1943. Box 8, Bound Volume: Examination Papers, Mid-Years 1908-09.

__________________________

ECONOMICS 3
Year-end Examination, 1908-09

  1. What, according to Spencer, is the relation between the development of domestic institutions and the economizing of individual life?
  2. How do you distinguish between passive and active adaptation? Give illustrations.
  3. Discuss the views of Galton and Pearson on the social aspects of biological selection.
  4. What, according to Tarde, is the place of imitation as a social factor?
  5. Compare Kidd and Buckle on the relation of religion to progress.
  6. State, in brief, and criticize Spencer’s sociological theory of morals.
  7. State the democratic and republican theories of representation and the application of each to the conditions of modern government.
  8. Would you draw any line between those industries which are suitable for government enterprise and those which are not? If so, where? If not, why not?

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examination Papers, 1873-1915. Box 8, Bound vol. Examination Papers 1908-09; Papers Set for Final Examinations in History, Government, Economics,…,Music in Harvard College (June, 1909), p. 34.

Image Source: Thomas Nixon Carver. The World’s Work. Vol. XXVI (May-October 1913) p. 127. Colorized by Economics in the Rear-view Mirror.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Principles

Harvard. Enrollment and semester examinations for principles of economics. Taussig, 1908-1909

Our march through the economics examinations at Harvard resumes with the academic year 1908-09. We start obviously with the Principles of Economics à la Frank W. Taussig. His team of teaching assistants turned out to have amounted to quite a bit (see the links in the course enrollment section below).

In addition to the 1908-09 exam questions for Principles of Economics taught at Harvard by Frank W. Taussig, this post includes the following links to the previously transcribed 37 years worth of examsAs you can see we have come a long way, though there is still over a century’s worth of exams to go.

________________________

Exams for principles (a.k.a. outlines)
of economics at Harvard
1870/71-1907/08

1871-75.
1876-77.
1877-78.
1878-79.
1879-80.
1880-81.
1881-82.
1882-83
.
1883-84
.
1884-85.
1885-86.
1886-87.
1887-88.
1888-89.
1889-90.
1890-91.
1891-92.
1892-93
.
1893-94.
1894-95.
1895-96
.
1896-97.
1897-98.
1898-99.
1899-00.
1900-01.
1901-02.
1902-03.
1903-04.
1904-05.
1905-06.
1906-07.
1907-08.

________________________

Course Enrollment
1908-09

Economics 1. Professor [Frank William] Taussig, assisted by Messrs. [Robert Lee] Hale, [Joseph Stancliffe] Davis, [Isaiah Leo] Sharfman, Stevens, and [Abbott Payson] Usher. — Principles of Economics.

Total 503: 1 Graduate, 21 Seniors, 97 Juniors, 241 Sophomores, 100 Freshmen, 43 Others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1908-1909, p. 67.

________________________

ECONOMICS 1
Mid-year Examination, 1908-09

Arrange your answers strictly in the order of the questions.

  1. Explain what determines, in the long run, the value of

free goods;
public goods;
goods produced at the margin of cultivation;
goods produced above the margin of cultivation.

  1. “Even if it were the fact that there is never any land taken into cultivation, for which rent, and that too of an amount worth taking into consideration, was not paid; it would be true, nevertheless, that there is always some agricultural capital which pays no rent, because it returns nothing beyond the ordinary rate of profit.”
    Do you think this holds good as to agricultural land? as to urban sites?
  2. Suppose land to be of uniform fertility, and suppose not all of it to be under cultivation: would there be rent? would there be interest? (Neglect differences of situation.)
    Would your answer be different, in either respect, if all the land were under cultivation?
  3. What is the effect of larger scale of production and more minute division of labor on

the irksomeness of labor;
the productiveness of labor;
the reward of labor;
the share which goes to labor as compared with other sorts of incomes.

5. What is the connection between

the “round about” or “lengthened” process of production;
the “effective desire of accumulation”;
the “discounted marginal product” of labor;
economic rent.

  1. A strike takes place in an industry whose owners are protected from competition by a patent. Its settlement is referred to an arbitrator, before whom the workmen undertake (with success) to show that the industry has been highly profitable to the owners. How far, it at all, should the arbitrator consider this fact in his decision?
    Suppose the case had been one of agricultural laborers on an unusually fertile farm, would your answer be different?
  2. Suppose a great and permanent fall to take place in the rate of interest on capital, other things remaining the same; what changes would you expect in

the general rate of wages; the values of commodities;
the prices of urban sites;
the prices of securities yielding a fixed income?

  1. “The price of a monopolized article is commonly supposed to be arbitrary: depending on the will of the monopolist, and limited only by the buyer’s extreme estimate of its worth to himself. This is in one sense true, but forms no exception, nevertheless, to the dependence of value on supply and demand.” In what sense true? and why no exception?
  2. Would you expect the organization of employees into trade unions to bring about higher wages in the case of
    domestic servants;
    motormen on street railways;
    plumbers.
    If so, how? if not, why not?

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University. Mid-year Examinations, 1852-1943. Box 8, Bound Volume: Examination Papers, Mid-Years 1908-09.

________________________

ECONOMICS 1
Year-end Examination, 1908-09

Arrange your answers strictly in the order of the questions.

  1. Explain briefly: value; price; unit price; index numbers; weighted average.
  2. What determines the value of: gold dollars; gold bullion; silver dollars; silver bullion?
  3. What determined the par of exchange between (1) the United States and England in 1870; (2) the United States and England in 1880; (3) the United States and Mexico in 1890? [Mexico had a silver standard in 1890.]
  4. Is it conceivable that a country should steadily import goods which its own producers can make at less expense than foreign producers? that it should import goods which its own producers can make at less cost than foreign producers?
  5. What determines the reserve against deposits held by the Bank of England? by the Bank of France? by the First National Bank in New York City? by the Charles River National Bank in Cambridge?
  6. “There is, therefore, a rough correspondence between the movements of loans and deposits … The true connection between these movements is often forgotten, but its nature can not be mistaken by anybody who will observe the steps by which an ordinary ‘discount’ is placed at the command of the borrower.” What is the nature of the connection? What are the steps?
  7. Which among the following, if any, do you consider “unproductive” laborers: a stock-exchange broker; the promoter of a trust; a legislative agent (lobbyist) exerting himself to bring about high tariff legislation; the editor of a blackmailing newspaper?
  8. In a socialist community, what changes from existing conditions would you expect as to: the medium of exchange; economic rent; business profit; highly competent administrators?
  9. What do you understand by the principle of diminishing utility? of marginal utility? How does either principle bear on (1) the values of commodities, (2) proposals for equalizing the distribution of wealth?

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examination Papers, 1873-1915. Box 8, Bound vol. Examination Papers 1908-09; Papers Set for Final Examinations in History, Government, Economics,…,Music in Harvard College (June, 1909), pp. 31-32.

Image Source: Frank W. Taussig in Harvard Class Album, 1915.

Categories
Economists Harvard M.I.T.

Harvard. Graduate records of economics PhD alumnus, Abraham George Silverman, 1930

Plot-spoiler: Abraham George Silverman ultimately became a non-atomic spy for the Soviets, one of their useful American bureaucrats. Links to details of that story can be found at the end of this post. In an earlier post you can find the Harvard graduate economics record of Lauchlin Currie along with a link to his testimony before the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

However for our purposes here, Silverman enters Economics in the Rear-view Mirror as a humble graduate student who succeeded in grinding through the requirements for a Harvard economics Ph.D. at the end of the Roaring ‘Twenties.

_______________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DIVISION OF HISTORY, GOVERNMENT, AND ECONOMICS

Application for Candidacy for the Degree of Ph.D.

[Note: Boldface used to indicate printed text of the application; italics used to indicate the handwritten entries]

I. Full Name, with date and place of birth.

Abraham George Silverman. Poland, Feb. 2, 1900.

II. Academic Career: (Mention, with dates inclusive, colleges or other higher institutions of learning attended; and teaching positions held.)

Boston University (College of Liberal Arts), Sept. 1917 to June, 1919.
Harvard College, Sept., 1919 to June, 1921.
Leland Stanford Jr. University, Sept. 1922 to Sept., 1923
Economic Research Assistant, Food Research Institute, Stanford University, June, 1922 to Oct. 1, 1923.
Inst. in Econ., M.I.T.

III. Degrees already attained. (Mention institutions and dates.)

S.B. in Economics, Harvard College, June, 1921.
A.M. in Economics, Stanford University, Sept., 1923.
A.M. Harvard, 1924.

IV. General Preparation. (Indicate briefly the range and character of your under-graduate studies in History, Economics, Government, and in such other fields as Ancient and Modern Languages, Philosophy, etc. In case you are a candidate for the degree in History, state the number of years you have studied preparatory and college Latin.)

History: Medieval and Modern European History, English History, American History, and “History of Liberty.”
Government: Principles of Popular Gov’t., Philosophy of the State.
Economics: Principles, Statistics, Accounting, Ec. Hist. of U.S., Money and Banking, Transportation, Corporations, Public Finance, Ec. thought and Institutions, “Socialism Anarchism, and Single Tax.”
Philosophy and Psych: Psychology (Principles), History of Philosophy, Philosophy of the State, Modern Philosophical Tendencies.
French.
Advanced Mathematics, etc.

V. Department of Study. (Do you propose to offer yourself for the Ph.D., “History,” in “Economics,” or in “Political Science”?)

Economics.

VI. Choice of Subjects for the General Examination. (State briefly the nature of your preparation in each subject, as by Harvard courses, courses taken elsewhere, private reading, teaching the subject, etc., etc.)

  1. Economic Theory and its History.
    Ec 10 (History of Ec. Thought and Institutions Dr. A. E. Monroe –  1920-21);
    Ec 11 (1923-24);
    Advanced Ec. Theory (J.M. Clark at Stanford);
    Seminaries in Ec. Theory (Stanford);
    Outside Reading.
    Ec 15 (1924-25).
    Teaching principles of economics 1924 – M.I.T.
  2. Economic History since 1750.
    Ec 23 (1st half 1923-24) Attended lectures 2nd half.
    Ec 2b (Dr. E.E. Lincoln, Harvard, 1919-20).
  3. Statistical Method and Its Applications.
    Ec 1b (Dr. J. S. Davis at Harvard);
    Ec 41 (1923-24);
    Stat. assistant to Dr. J.S. Davis, Summer of 1920;
    Ec. Research Assistant, Food Res. Ins., Stanford Univ. 1 1/2 yrs;
    Stat. work in Fed. Res. Bank of Bos.;
    A.M. Thesis on “Wheat Supplies, Distribution and Prices, May 1920 to July 1921”
    Taught Statistics (1925-26) – M.I.T.
  4. Money Banking & Crises.
    Ec 3 (A.E. Monroe, Harvard);
    Ec. 38 (1923-24);
    Foreign Exchg. (A.C. Whitaker – Stanford);
    Reading in History of Money and Banking & Crises in connection with Ec. 23;
    Acquaintance with the methods of Harvard Econ. Service.
  5. Transportation.
    Ec 4a, 4b (Prof. Ripley, Harvard, 1920-21)
    Lectures in “Overhead Costs” (J.M. Clark – Stanford);
    Outside reading outlined by 
    Prof. Cunningham.
  6. American History since 1789.
    Hist 32, 32b (Mr. Morrison, Prof. Channing – Harvard College (1920-21);
    Lectures in Hist 17 (1923-24)
    Hist 13b or 39 (1923-24, second half)
    Outside reading.

VII. Special Subject for the special examination.

Money and Banking, and Crises.

VIII. Thesis Subject. (State the subject and mention the instructor who knows most about your work upon it.)

The International Trade of Great Britain, 1880-1913. A statistical analysis of some aspects of the theory of international trade and prices (With Prof. Taussig)

IX. Examinations. (Indicate any preferences as to the time of the general and special examinations.)

General Examination — May 1924 (if adequately prepared by then).
Last of March or first of April.

X. Remarks

Professors Taussig, Bullock, Williams

Signature of a member of the Division certifying approval of the above outline of subjects.

[signed] F. W. Taussig

*   *   *   [Last page of application] *   *   *

[Not to be filled out by the applicant]

Name: Abraham George Silverman.

Approved: Janary 11, 1924.

Ability to use French certified by A. E. Monroe. 12 Jan. 1925

Ability to use German certified by A. E. Monroe. 12 Jan. 1925.

Date of general examination April 8, 1926. Passed T.N.C.

Thesis received April 1, 1930

Read by Professors Bullock, Taussig, Williams

Approved May 1, 1930

Date of special examination May 5, 1930. Passed – F.W.T..

Recommended for the Doctorate [left blank]

Degree conferred  [left blank]

Remarks.  [left blank]

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Certification of reading knowledge
of French and German for Ph.D.

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

Cambridge, Massachusetts
Jan. 12, 1925

Mr. A. G. Silverman has this day passed a satisfactory examination in the reading of French and German, as required of candidates for the doctors degree.

[signed]
A. E. Monroe

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
(INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE SHEET)

Cambridge, Massachusetts

Record of
Abraham George Silverman
in the
Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
               1923-1924
COURSE
HALF-COURSE
Economics 11 A
Economics 23 (1st hf) A
Economics 38 A minus
Economics 41 A
History 392 A
Grade
               1924-1925
COURSE
HALF-COURSE
Economics 151 (mid-year)

Abs

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Scheduling General Examination
(First Attempt)

15 May 1925

Dear Mr. Silverman:

This is to remind you that your general examination for the Ph.D. in Economics is to be held on Tuesday, 19 May, at 4 p.m. in Widener U.

Very truly yours,
[unsigned copy]
Secretary of the Division

Mr. Abraham G. Silverman

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Scheduling General Examination
(First Attempt)

15 May 1925

My dear Professor Young

This is to remind you that you are the chairman of the committee for the general examination of Mr. Abraham George Silverman for the Ph.D. in Economics, to be held on Tuesday, 19 May at 4 p.m. in Widener U. I enclose Mr. Silverman’s papers herewith. The other members of the committee are Professors Carver, Ripley, Merk and Cole.

Very truly yours,
[unsigned copy]
Secretary of the Division

Professor A.A. Young

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Failed General Examination, first try

22 Concord Ave., Cambridge, Massachusetts
May 19, 1925

As Chairman of the committee appointed to conduct the general examination of Mr. A. G. Silverman for the degree of Ph.D. in Economics, I have to report that Mr. Silverman failed to pass the examination.

The committee recommends, however, that Mr. Silverman be encouraged take another examination. On one subject (statistics) he was better prepared than the average candidate. Only in two subjects did his preparation appear to be distinctly inadquate. There is reason to believe, furthermore, that there may have been certain circumstances which counted against the candidate’s doing himself full justice.

[signed]
Allyn A. Young

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Scheduling General Examination
(Second Attempt)

March 24, 1926.

Dear Mr. Silverman:

This is to inform you that the date of your general examination has been set for Thursday, April 8, at four o’clock. The committee consists of Professors Carver (chairman), Persons, Ripley, Merk, and Cole.

Very truly yours,
[unsigned copy]
Secretary of the Division

Mr. Abraham G. Silverman

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Examiners for the
General Examination
(Second attempt)

March 24 1926

Dear Sir:

Will it be possible for you to serve as a member of the committee for the general examination in Economics of Mr. A. G. Silverman, to be held on Thursday, April 8, at four o’clock? Mr. Silverman’s subjects for the general examination are:

  1. Economic Theory and its History
  2. Economic History since 1750
  3. Statistical Method and Its Application
  4. Transportation
  5. American History since 1789

Mr. Silverman’s special subject is Money, Banking, and Crises.

The committee consists of Professors Carver (chairman), Persons, Ripley, Merk, and Cole. Taussig.

Very truly yours,
[unsigned copy]
Secretary of the Division

[Pencil note added to bottom:] Professor Taussig would like to serve.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Responses to the request
to serve on the committee for the General Examination (2nd try)

[Postmark: Mar 29, 1926]

[The following responses to the card requesting participation by examiners:]

I can cannot serve on the committee for the general examination of Mr. Silverman on April 8.

[respectively by] Professors Persons, Cole, Merk, Ripley.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Confirming Taussig as Examiner
for the General Examination
(Second attempt)

March 30 1926.

My dear Professor Taussig:

You have been kind enough to say you will serve as a member of the committee for the general examination in Economics of Mr. A. G. Silverman, to be held on Thursday, April 8, at four o’clock? Mr. Silverman’s subjects for the general examination are:

  1. Economic Theory and its History
  2. Economic History since 1750
  3. Statistical Method and Its Application
  4. Transportation
  5. American History since 1789

Mr. Silverman’s special subject is Money, Banking, and Crises.

The committee consists of Professors Carver (chairman), Persons, Taussig, Ripley, and Merk.

Very truly yours,
[unsigned copy]
Secretary of the Division

Professor F. W. Taussig.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Passed General Examination, second try

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

Cambridge, Massachusetts
April 9, 1926

The Committee on the General Examination of Abraham George Silverman for the Ph.D. degree, held April 8, 1926, voted unanimously to accept the examination as satisfactory.

[signed]
T. N. Carver
Chairman of the Committee

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Passed Special Examination

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

Cambridge, Massachusetts
May 6, 1930.

Dear dear Professor Carver:–

As chairman of the committee appointed to conduct the special examination for the Ph.D. degree of Mr. Silverman I beg to report that Mr. Silverman passed the examination.

Very truly yours,
[signed]
F. W. Taussig

Professor T. N. Carver
772 Widener Library
Cambridge, Massachusetts

Source: Harvard University Archives. Division of History, Government & Economics, PhD. Degrees Conferred, Box 10.

__________________________

Course Names and Instructors

Harvard, 1919-20

Economics 1b.  Dr. J. S. Davis. – Statistics.

Economics 2b. Dr. E.E. Lincoln.– Economic History of the United States.

Economics 3. A. E. Monroe. – Money, Banking, and Commercial Crises.

Harvard, 1920-21

Economics 10. Dr. A.E. Monroe.– History of Economic Thought and Institutions.

Economics 322Professor Carver. – Economics of Agriculture.

Economics 4a. Professor Ripley. – Economics of Transportation.

Economics 4b. Professor Ripley. – Economics of Corporations.

History 32a. Dr. Morrison. – American History: The Formation of the Union, from 1760 to 1829.

History 32b. Professor Channing. – American History: The Development of the Nation, 1830 to the Present Time.

Stanford, 1922-23

John M. Clark. – Advanced Economic Theory.

A. C. Whitaker. – Foreign Exchange

Audited lectures by J. M. Clark on Overhead Costs

Harvard, 1923-24

Economics 11. Professor Taussig. – Economic Theory.

Economics 23. Asst. Professor Usher. – Modern Economic History since 1750. Registered in the first term, audited lectures second term.

Economics 38. Professor Young. – Principles of Money and Banking.

Economics 41. Asst. Professor Crum. – Statistical Theory and Analysis.

History 39b. Professor Turner – History of the United States, 1880-1920.

History 17. Professor Turner and Dr. Merk. – The History of the West. Audited lectures.

1924-25

Economics 15. Professor Young. – Modern Schools of Economic Thought.

Source: Harvard University. Reports of the President of Harvard College for 1919-20, 1920-21, 1923-24, 1924-25.

__________________________

Abraham George Silverman
Timeline of his education and career

1900. Born Feb. 2 in Poland.

1913-1917. Attended Boston English High School. Boston, Massachusetts.

1917-19. Undergraduate student in the College of Liberal Arts, Boston University.

1918. Inducted into U.S. Army October 9, honorably discharged December 13.

1919-21. Undergraduate student, Harvard College.

1921. Naturalized U.S. Citizen in Boston, January 24.

1921. June. S.B. from Harvard College.

1922-23. Food Research Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. May 1922 to October 1923.

1923. September. A.M.  in Economics from Stanford.

1923-24. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, intermittent.

1923-24. Graduate student, Harvard University.

1924. A.M. in Economics from Harvard.

1924. Better Homes in America, Inc., and Division of Building and Housing, U.S. Department of Commerce, June 1924 to September 1924.

1924-31. Instructor in Economics, M.I.T. June 1924 to June 1931.

1924-31. Babson Statistical Organization.

1930. Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard. Thesis: The International Trade of Great Britain, 1880-1913.

1931-32. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, N.Y. September 1931 to August 1932.

1932-33. Brown University and Rockefeller Foundation, Providence, Rhode Island, September 1932 to June 1933.

1933-34. Labor Advisory Board of the National Recovery Administration. Sept. 1933 to July 1934.

1934-36. United States Tariff Commission. November 1934 to February 1936.

1936-42. Chief Econmist and Director of research at the Railroad Retirement Board, Washington, D.C. March 1936 to March 1942.

1941. Loaned to U.S. Treasury Department. Frozen funds policy.

1942-45. Civilian economic advisor and Chief of Analysis and Plans to the Assistant Chief of the Army Air Forces Air Staff for Material and Service. March 25, 1942 to August 18, 1945.

1945. August. Left the Pentagon to work for the French Supply Council in Washington, D.C.

1948-53. Called several times to testify before Congressional committees having been named as a member of the Silvermaster ring of government informants reporting to espionage agents of the Soviet Union. He repeatedly invoked the protection of the fifth amendment to refuse answering questions during the Congressional hearings. Testimony of Abraham George Silverman, August 12, 1948.

Abraham George Silverman talking at the hearing on Communist spy activities in the US. (Washington, DC, US, Aug 1948) Photographer: Tony Linck

Image Source: Life Images, hosted by Google Images.
For personal non-commercial use only

1953-73. Obscurity.

1973. Died of a heart attack January 7 in New Jersey.

Principal Sources for the Timeline: Harvard University and F.B.I. Records. Report of Edward E. Kachelhoffer March 18, 1949.

Image Source: M.I.T. yearbook Technique 1931, p. 47

Categories
Business School Cornell Germany

Germany. The experience of Business Schools in Munich, Berlin, Leipzig and Cologne. Moritz Bonn, 1915

The German professor of political economy and director of the relatively young Munich School of Commerce (Handelshochschule), Moritz J. Bonn, found himself in the rather awkward position of being a visiting professor at American universities during World War One. In preparing an earlier post on the graduate school courses taken by Frank Knight, I came across the printed version of a public lecture that he gave at Cornell intended to share German experience in the creation of business schools to provide professional training for future business leaders. 

_____________________________

Moritz Julius Bonn (1873-1965)

As a student at Heidelberg Moritz Julius Bonn attended lectures by Karl Knies, and he later studied under Lujo Brentano at the University of Munich. He followed this with a semester at the University of Vienna to study with Carl Menger before completing his 1895 doctoral dissertation on Spain’s decline during the price revolution of the 16th century. The Winter semester 1895/96 was at the University of Freiburg with Max Weber. Next he continued his research studies at the newly opened LSE in 1896-98. He wrote his 1906 Habilitationschrift in Munich on the English colonization of Ireland. 1910 appointed director of the Handelshochschule in Münich (later integrated into the TU-Munich in 1922). He emigrated from Germany in 1933 following his forced resignation from the Berlin Handelshochule (Bonn descended from a Jewish family that had been in Frankfurt for four centuries). Bonn was awarded an honorary doctorate from the Freie Universität Berlin in 1956.

_____________________________

Professor Moritz J. Bonn comes to Cornell as the third encumbent of the non-resident professorship under the Jacob H. Shiff foundation. Professor Bonn was born at Frankfort-am-Main, in 1873 and has studied at Heidelberg, Munich, and Vienna. Since 1905 he has been professor of Political Economy at the University of Munich, and since 1910 the Director of the School of Commerce in Munich. Having traveled and lived in England, Ireland, and South Africa, he has had abundant opportunity to study his specialties, the subjects of Colonial Policies and International Relations on which he has written several books of accepted authority. Professor Bonn was called to the United States before the war to give a course of lectures in the University of California in the fall term of 1914-1915. Last spring he lectured under the Carl Shurz foundation in the University of Wisconsin and he comes to Cornell after a summer spent in the far west. He is to be here for this term only and is giving two courses, one in International International Relations and the other on Economic Organization and Social Legislation in Modern Germany.

Source: The Cornell Era, Vol. XLVIII, No. 3 (December, 1915), p. 176.

_____________________________

From Moritz J. Bonn’s Memoir

I had been called for the fall term to Cornell University, to the Jacob Schiff chair for German culture. Though Mr. Andrew D. White had resigned from its presidency, he still was a spiritual center. He was deeply disappointed by Germany’s attitude in the war and had turned the photograph William II had given him with its face to the wall. But he and his wife were very kind to us. President Schurman was not. He was correct but nothing more. I had to lecture on a German subject, and I had chosen as my topic the expansion of Germany. He objected to it, and but for my close connection with Mr. Schiff I might have got into difficulties. Finally I delivered the dullest series of lectures I have ever given….

Source: Moritz J. Bonn (1948). Wandering Scholar, (New York: John Day Company) pp. 177-78.

_____________________________

SCHOOLS OF COMMERCE
IN GERMANY

Professor Moritz Julius Bonn
Cornell University Lecture, December 11, 1915

When a person has to talk on some subject in a foreign university, it is well, as a rule, only to talk about matters that are not of any practical importance to the country he is in, or he might be credited with having missionary tendencies. From this point of view, I might have preferred more to talk to you, if I did not know that yon had in mind the erection of a College of Commerce. But, as President Schurman asked me to give you, I won’t say the benefit of our experience, for that would seem that I expected you to benefit by it, but to endeavor to tell you what we have done, and why and how we have done it, I am delighted to give you the information at my disposal.

As I am a part of this movement in Germany, I shall have to restrain my natural modesty somewhat and speak about things which I have done, not because I feel that I have done them better than anyone else, but because I feel that I can give you more facts about the things that I have actually done and know about. I know what our problems have been and how we have attempted to solve them. I am more familiar with the situation in Munich, as I am connected with the Commercial University there. As this is one of the later commercial universities in Germany, we have profited by the experience of some of the others to a certain extent. Now, I think anyone can realize our problems, if they will look at the great change in German industrial life in the past few years. The great need that has been felt for industrial education is due more or less to the fact that in the last twenty-five years the small establishments have lost out in Germany. About thirty years ago only about a third of the people employed in industries and commerce were in big establishments. Sixty per cent of the people were in small establishments employing a maximum of five people. At the present time the change has been completed and you might almost say that the figures haye been reversed. All this had a very important bearing on our education. In the olden days the education of the boy for the business man was that he went to a preparatory school for three years, after which he had another six years of schooling. Entering school at six years of age, he would be about fifteen or sixteen when he finished his education. Then he was apprenticed out to somebody who would be his master for between two and four years. During this time he was supposed to pick up all tricks of the business from licking stamps and running around on errands, to the complete affairs handled by the concern. Taking it from the point of view of the average business man, this education from a commercial point was not bad. The general education which people got at school was good enough so far as securing information went, not only did it provide the people with information, but created a thirst for further information and the acquiring of knowledge for itself. The general education of the German business man fifty years ago was higher somewhat than the average education of the British merchant. Viewing the terrible loss of human life and wealth which accompanied the industrial revolution in England, we can only look upon it with a feeling of unmixed horror.

A great many of our people in small circumstances have a very lively interest in all questions outside of business. In some of the very small German municipalities they have a theatre in which not only fine pieces are staged, but the classics of all the world are produced and listened to by this class of people. Sometimes, of course, they are produced by second and third rate actors, but the fact that they are attended proves that the people have a real yearning for information other than just merely business.

In many ways the education of the business man was sufficient to enable him to get on in business and at the same time to play a strong part in the general life of the community in which he lived. But things have changed completely. A young man who is sent into a banking establishment today will be lucky indeed if he learns very much. Our large banking establishments, employing about five thousand people are not the place for a boy to pick up very much information. In fact he is sent into a department where perhaps he goes on errands, licks the postage stamps, etc., and no matter how well he does his work, he has very little opportunity for advancement or to learn much about the complete affairs of the concern, in fact, if he asks questions and wants to know the reason for things, somebody must give him an answer, and he is apt to be looked upon as something to be avoided. Even if he has ambition and desires to learn, those holding responsible positions do not have a great interest in doing much for him. So long as he does his work well, he is liked, but if he doesn’t, then it is easy enough to get it done by somebody else.

Of course many of the things necessary in business can be taught; reading, writing and arithmetic, accounting, striking off balances, etc. These can all be drilled into a fellow, just as well as geography, history, etc. They even went so far in Austrian schools that they taught business accounting, banking, etc., and ran a kind of fictitious banking house, and did all the things as they are done in business. The success was not very great, however. It takes a lot of imagination to furnish a sufficient number of practical business cases. The man who is a good accountant and a good bookkeeper is not blessed as a rule with any too much imagination. The man with much imagination goes in for writing fiction, but not for organizing imaginary business transactions. Of course, one could learn a great deal in this way about the theory of banking, but it is not very practical. In modern times in Germany, owing to the great economic changes that have taken place, the responsibility of the business man is quite different from what it was before when he was the head of a small bank where he had very little business responsibility. The head of a bank with fifty or sixty million dollars capital, having six thousand employees, with branches all over the world, must be an organizer and a thoroughly trained business man. He is like the Hamburg-American Line, whose motto is “My field is the world.” In this capacity you couldn’t use a man of ordinary qualities, if he was merely taught the ordinary things which were taught to men years ago. Business is now much more a question of organization than it has ever been before. Some men are born organizers, but even the born organizer has to learn many things.

Another difficulty is our legislature. It became very greatly involved in business. The idea which has always been understood in Germany is that big business means big officers. The business man is a kind of official of the commonwealth. The relation between business man and the commonwealth in the past few years has become much more intimate. One can easily realize the changes in this field by a study of the big system of German social legislation. It is easy enough to get hold of men who are able to understand the statutes, but statutes have to be made, and it is of very great importance to the business man if his voice is heard in making the statutes. So you see he must not only know his business, and its connection with other business and with the nation at large, but he must understand the laws governing his business and be capable of expressing his position. He must be able to mingle with people of education. As a matter of fact, all of our best intellects go into the service of the State. The men who run the government are of of excellent education. Unless the business man of today is able to cope with men of greater education, and has a thorough understanding of the laws governing the line of business he is in, he appears at a great disadvantage in attempting to express his position.

I have heard it said very often in German circles, that it is a lamentable state of affairs that we have certain men at the head of the Chambers of Commerce, who are very influential, but there are many things they cannot do. They cannot write a good report, they cannot deliver a speech unless it is prepared by someone else, and they are not thoroughly familiar with the principles and organization of business and of government. This difficulty has often been overcome by the Chamber of Commerce employing a secretary who is a man of excellent education and very brilliant, having, as you say, the gift of gab. We have had some very excellent results in this way.

Another difficulty arises in German technical and engineering circles. In a great part of German industry the technical workers are fitted for their positions at the technical high schools where they are turned out as first class engineers. They may be first class engineers and fine business men, but the making of goods is very different from selling them, and to find the market for one little machine is quite different from making it. The engineer and chemist employed by a concern may be much better educated men than the one running the business, but the last phase of the business must be in the control of the merchant, the business man. Very often the man in charge knows what is the right thing to do, but he cannot express it. He does not know how to talk. He may know all about how to build machinery, but he isn’t a business man. I remember one of our big electrical concerns was practically wrecked by being run by a genius of an engineer, whose education and ability in his line were first class, but who did not realize that making machinery was not the ultimate object of a commercial concern.

On all sides there were problems confronting the business people, and they began to realize that the solution of them would only come through better business education. The bankers realized it first. At the same time some of the big steel and iron concerns realized it. In big steel and iron concerns such as we have in Germany, problems of organization are much more important than problems of marketing. Some of the very best government officials have been taken over by private concerns to help solve these questions of organization. The Political Economy Department of the Munich University in the last few years has turned out at least a dozen bankers. The present Chancellor of the Exchequer is by training a political economist. He started to be a professor, then he was taken up by the government, then the biggest bank there got hold of him, and he landed after that as (Chancellor of the Exchequer. Now I do not mean to imply that the Department of Political Economy at Munich has the habit of turning out Chancellors of the Exchequer every day.

There was one thing that the people understood — that for bigger business you needed a bigger education. The problem was where to get it. Could it be obtained at the universities?

From a practical point of view there was much grave objection to the German Universities. The ideal of the university is research. I am not going to say that we are better than other people and live up to our ideals entirely. We cannot afford to live in a theoretical idealistic atmosphere. Our universities are supported by the state, and the state wants something in return. So the universities have turned out state officials. Our universities don’t train men merely for state officials, or civil servants, but lecturers as well, teachers for the higher German schools, veterinary men who go in for state employment, theologians, etc. All sorts of people attend our universities. Whenever we give vocational instruction we give it from the point of view that we want our pupils not only to get knowledge, but we want to teach them how to think and to acquire knowledge for themselves. As a matter of fact, our universities today are thoroughly non-utilitarian, and I personally hope they will remain so. That is one of the reasons why when the technical high schools were started they had to be built up separately from the universities, for they could not be in the same way non-utilitarian. They do not start as the universities do with education for service of the public, but they teach education for all branches of life. \Ve have seen in the development of the technical high school that the non-utilitarian character of the university was as an obstacle to co-operation. You could not expect business men to take a different light. They felt, and this feeling exists among many business men of the world, that there is too much theory in the universities. Things you can refute are theories; things which you can prove are facts.

Supposing a man has built up a big business, and has a son whom he desires to have continue that business, and wants to give him a good all around education for it. He sends him to the university to be trained and you cannot expect to think very much of the university when the boy returns after three or four years and says: “I am not going to work in your shop. I am going to become an official of the government.” Or, “I am going into some sort of research work.” These are some of the difficulties between business men and the universities.

We insist that the people who go to the university must have twelve years education taking it all combined. They are about eighteen or nineteen years old when they are qualified to enter the university. The business men maintain that it would not be a good thing if a boy was brought in touch with business after his university education, as he would then be too old to pick up any useful tricks. They even say that nineteen years is too old for picking up the apprentice tricks. They prefer to get them after they have qualified for service one year in the army, when they are about sixteen years old. It might be possible to make special arrangements for study of commercial affairs and let them into the universities at sixteen, but the general attitude was that this would not be wise for if we allowed it for students of commercial subjects we would have to allow it for other things. A great many people can to the technical high schools who are not fitted for the universities. There are other important reasons why the commercial colleges should not be attached to the technical high school. The basis for teaching there is natural science. This is by no means a very good general basis for teaching business, on the one side, and on the other side the general civic duties which are taught in our universities. Beside this we have a certain antagonism in German business life between the industrial people and our mercantile class, bankers, merchants, etc. Or in other words, there is an antagonism between commerce and industry. The technical education of industry being built on a natural science basis, it was quite clear that with the existing antagonism, the commercial school should be somewhere else. We had an example of this in one place where they had a commercial branch of the technical high school, and the result was an attendance of only about eight or nine pupils.

Now, what is business and how should we teach it? There are undoubtedly many things connected with business which cannot be taught, but certain elements in business can be taught. They can be taught scientific training; in the fundamental principles of business organization and administration. A broad foundation may be laid for intelligently directed activity in commerce or manufacturing, or those specialized branches of modern business which now particularly call for trained men, such as accounting, railroading, banking, insurance, etc. A really good business man is a man who understands a certain business situation. He is a better business man if he has the gift of acting in that situation. He is a genius if he can bring about that situation. We cannot teach people to do that. In some ways the problem is much like the problem in military schools. In a military university you cannot teach a man to be a great general or to fight a victorious battle, but there are certain fundamental principles which can be taught, certain rules, certain routine business. But there is always a tendency to think that the man who has learned the routine, who knows it well, is a completely turned out product. The essence of all business strife is the element of risk. You cannot do away with it. In modern times conservation in business takes more than a mere commercial education.

Before establishing our Schools of commerce we went into the matter very carefully. We realized the element of risk, but all agreed that it would be much better to have it run as a privately endowed institution, than to have it financed by the government. If public money is provided for a new institution, the money has to be spent in accordance with certain rules, and every Member of Parliament has a right to talk as to how the money shall be spent. A great many Members of Parliament are business men and we realized that there would be a great deal of talk. The result is that practically all German colleges of Commerce are private schools, run by big endowments of business men; some are funded by municipalities and Chambers of Commerce. For the first time in Germany education was started on a private basis in institutions ranking as universities. Of course there is a certain amount of consideration given to the government, and we work continually hand in hand with the government authorities. I might say that we tell them what we have done, but we do not ask them about what we are going to do. So if any Member raises a question in Parliament as to what we are doing and the way we are doing it, the Secretary of Education simply gets up and says: “I am very sorry, gentlemen, but it is not your money that is being spent”, and that is all there is to it.

We developed three types of these schools. The first type was started in Leipzig, where they run a commercial branch in combination with the university. It drills them in double accounting, how to strike balances, a little commercial law, how a bill of exchange locks, etc. It was an excellent school of its kind and did a great deal of good work. Many boys were sent to Leipzig to be taught the German system of keeping accounts. All the students in the Commercial School were allowed certain instruction in the University, and those in the University were allowed instruction in the Commercial School. This was a fine thing, perhaps, for many of the boys, for it gave them the privilege of being connected with the university by being enrolled in the commercial school.

The second type was in Cologne. A very rich man in Cologne died and left a great deal of money to be devoted to a commercial school. Cologne is a rich city, many of the people there are in the steel and iron industry and they have lots of money. The idea was to start an institution which would be called a commercial university, but which would be much more. It was to be a kind of university chiefly erected for business people. It tried in many ways to be like a university. Many things were taught which had little to do with the education of business people. For sample, instruction in English was given by a first class fellow who knew a great deal about Shakespeare and the early English poets, but who would be greatly at a disadvantage if he tried to write a business letter in good English. They tried to teach business in the same way that science is taught in a university.

The same way was followed by the people in Berlin. A large corporation in the Stock Exchange wanted to do something great for mankind and also to commemorate their own service, so they subscribed a big fund to erect a beautiful building, which was to be used as a school of commerce. A most brilliant man was called to fill the chair at the head of the institution. He was a man who would be a very fine ornament to any first-class university, but who knew little about commerce, business and practical questions. They called all sorts of people for instructors who were wonderful scholars, but who were not of very much assistance in solving practical business questions. Among them I remember they called a man who was a marvel at saving theoretical problems, how to measure the interior of the earth, etc., etc., but who was not of any very practical assistance to any future Captain of Industry. Besides if a student wants that sort of thing, he can get it at the university, which was next door. They started with the idea that they could only give to business people what they wanted to give them by creating an organization just like the university.

At the institution in Munich we took a different course. We didn’t do it absolutely from wisdom, perhaps, but more properly from necessity. We didn’t have as much money as the others had. I have often thought that the absence of money in a university is by no means a great drawback, for yon then devote your attention to the more serious problems, the things of vital issue, and do not waste money and time on theoretical problems, when you haven’t the money to waste. Our idea was to create a commercial college based on a departmental idea.

In Germany there is great antagonism between the business people and the universities. The business people feel that their sons do not get the proper education to be of assistance to them in their business by attending the universities. In former years the boys became apprentices and grew up with the business, but in doing this they were apt to become men of routine, who lacked the initiative to take large responsibilities, such as are required of the successful business manager. They are so busy with business that they have no time for the broader study that would be of great practical value to them.

Now as you see we have the three types of commercial school. The institution at Leipzig which is simply a combination course, the institutions at Gerlin and Cologne, which tried to be universities, and the one at Munich, which tried to do departmental work in a university spirit.

We had many problems to face, and among others the question of organization arose. Were we going to follow the old organization of the German Universities? The German universities elect a faculty head for only one year, and in some instances two years. It was our idea that no institution would ever get ahead which continued this method of electing a head, and that something new had to be done. We did not believe in injecting politics into an institution where no political objects were at stake, and where it was merely a question of business efficiency. No business can be taught by merely talking, or by having a kind of theoretical debates of the problems and questions. They can only be taught with a certain amount of routine. We have continually to do something to make a good showing as we are dependent upon Trustees and people for financial aid. Plenty of people are willing to put in their money, and also to furnish ideas— a great many of which we could not carry out There are many problems to solve between Trustees and Faculty.

In Munich we co-operate with the University and Technical High Schools to a very great degree. Outside of Commercial Science, practically every professor on my staff is attached to the faculty of the university and technical high school. We have succeeded in establishing a true university spirit. We aim not only to teach them business, but to train them to be citizens of the highest type.

There is great feeling in Germany between men in the universities and men in commerce. For instance, take my own case. It is sometimes difficult for them to consider me as one of their colleagues, and treat me as a university man, as they look upon me as somewhat inferior when I go to my office. We have yet to overcome many difficulties.

We employ regular professors, assistant professors, and instructors; also some high government officials and heads of big business concerns give us the benefit of their experience. Our experiences are very mixed. We find that few business people are first-class teachers. The majority of than are willing to give us some information, but they keep back oftentimes the more essential facts. Yet co-operation with the business man has been excellent, although the student is unable to learn as much as we might wish.

The students consist of two classes :— first, the student who has been for two years a general clerk, and second, the student who had the right to serve but one year in the army, has passed an examination, and gone into business for two years. I cannot give you any statistical facts about these boys, as I left my notes at home. This proves I think, that I am not on a missionary trip, I can only tell you, therefore, what I remember.

Before entering the Commercial School, the boys are expected to have two years of training as clerks, or in business in some capacity. If there is one maxim more than another on which practically the whole structure of commercial education rests in Germany, it is that some practical training in actual commercial work shall precede the school training. We look the boys up very carefully and often call upon the Chamber of Commerce for information. We are not very rigid in this rule when we find that a good student was an apprentice in a shop only a year or perhaps three-quarters of a year. Sometimes we find a student who has been an apprentice three or four years and has learned nothing, while others learn a great deal in a year, A great deal depends upon the boy. Our students at eighteen years of age have been, as a rule, for two years in business and have had a good general education. Some of the students which we have go into business as clerks and having gained some knowledge of the business they desire to follow, come back to us to do some studying along that line. Not all of our students take examinations; some of them study for the examination, while others care only for certain courses that will help them to get on in their particular business. Some of them come to us, perhaps, to be trained for a year in Political Economy. They know what they want and go about getting it.

The regular students have to stay with us two years, four terms, which we consider too short a time We would like to make it three years, with six terms.

In Berlin and Cologne they have spent so much money on fine buildings, that they think they have to insist upon a great number of students. If they do not, the people putting up the capital will think they have made a poor investment.

We first teach Commercial Science. Perhaps we should not call it science, although it is undoubtedly of a scientific nature. We teach them the real problems in accounting, striking balances, questions of industrial organization, and a good deal, too, of mere routine work.

We teach Political Economy, and Commercial Law, and Industrial Law. Business practice is so closely related with law that it is advisable and even necessary that students of business have some acquaintance with this essential feature. They do not need to have a knowledge of legal procedure and other matters which are called the machinery of the law, but they do require a working knowledge of the laws that have direct application to the conduct of their business. Legal training cultivates qualities that are directly useful in solving problems of a purely business character. They learn the ability to analyze and to state clearly and concisely the facts of a complicated business situation. We aim to teach the students to apply general principles and to think for themselves.

We require the study of one language. The student can choose English or French. We assume that he has gotten a secondary school education in the subject he has elected, and we are not concerned with teaching grammar.

We teach them geography and a good many elective branches which they can pick up if they like. We have examinations, partly written and partly oral. Written examinations consist of two or three hours of political economy and commercial science.

We aim to give thorough and complete instruction in the fundamental principles of business organization and administration, and to present such a range of elective courses that each student may receive the instruction that will fit him for the business career he proposes to enter.

We have complete liberty of attendance among the students. Whether they come or not, it is up to themselves. Our idea is not only to give them information, but we want to train their minds to work for themselves. The figures show that every year we get a greater number of students. In looking about us and studying the situation we find a great many of our former students holding responsible positions.

Good business men are really born; you cannot make a man a first class leader if he hasn’t got it in him. You can, no doubt, teach men a good many things that will be helpful to them, but we do not want to train the small clerk who will remain all his life a small clerk. For him to spend his time and energy with us would be a waste of money. No university can make a wise man of a fool, and also no university can make a fool of a wise man. We take as a definite stand that we want to teach the students to draw out what is in them, to develop their own qualities, to make them leaders in business, and we try to teach them all the practical tricks of the trade, and to give them general instruction in what is essential in all classes of business.

We endeavor to teach them that we live in a community, the welfare of which depends upon the action of its individuals, and that what tends to help the individual will help the country at large, and when they serve their own interests they serve the interest of the public as well. We try to make the students feel responsible for their own actions. We are trying to teach the spirit of cooperation, and this is the spirit that prevails throughout Germany to-day. If it were not so, Germany could not have faced the great crisis which she has been facing for the past year and a half.

I think if you know anything about Germany, you will agree that we have started on the right track. There is much yet to be done, and none realize it better than we, but we do feel that we have taken a step in the right direction. Whether that direction may be good for the other nations is not a question for me to decide.

Source: Professor E. R. A. Seligman’s copy of the Stenographic report of a lecture on schools of commerce in Germany … delivered December 11, 1915, before members of all the faculties in Cornell University by Professor Julius Bonn (1873-1965), Professor at the University of Munich. Copy of microform at archive.com.

Image: Portrait from June 27, 2023 article Moritz Julius Bonn: Stets dort, wo Geschichte geschrieben wurde at the website of the Frankfurter Allgemeine.