Categories
Exam Questions Harvard

Harvard. Final Examination for Economics of Socialism, Mason and Sweezy, 1937 and 1939

 

 

The Harvard undergraduate course, The Economics of Socialism, evolved from Thomas Nixon Carver’s course, Methods of Social Reform, (exam questions from 1920) that had been introduced into the curriculum in 1902-03. The Economics of Socialism course was taught from 1935-36 through 1938-39 by Edward S. Mason and Paul Sweezy. The 1937-38 course outline and reading assignments along with final exam questions have been posted earlier. In this posting I have transcribed the final examination questions from the second terms of 1936-37 and 1938-39. I have not been able to locate a copy of the 1935-36 exam questions yet.

 In subsequent years this course was taught by Sweezy, Schumpeter, and Taylor. 

_____________________________

1936-37
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 11b2

I
Write about one hour

  1. If you were setting out to write a book on the Soviet economic system on what questions would you concentrate your attention? To what extent do the Webb’s provide adequate answers to these questions and in what respects do you regard their treatment as deficient?

II
Answer four questions

  1. Discuss briefly Utopian Socialism and Chartism and indicate what, if any, relation they bear to each other and to the modern socialist movement.
  2. For what types of economic problems would you consider the Marxian method of analysis superior to the orthodox (equilibrium) method?
  3. To what extent, if at all, does Marx’s analysis of the decline of capitalism depend upon the growth of large scale enterprise?
  4. What is Lenin’s theory of imperialism? How is it related to Marx’s analysis of capitalism?
  5. “The proper goal for socialist economic planners is that disposition and use of resources which is supposed to be achieved by the perfectly competitive market.” Discuss.

 

Final. 1937.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Papers Printed for Final Examinations, History, History of Religions, … ,Economics, … , Military Science, Naval Science. Jan—June, 1937. (HUC 7000.28, vol. 79 of 284).

_____________________________

1938-39
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 11b2

I
(Reading Period — one hour)

  1. From your reading in the Webbs and your general knowledge of American conditions, what do you take to be the fundamental differences between the economic systems of the Soviet Union and the United States? Support your answer by justifying the criteria which you have selected for the purpose of judging what are the fundamentally significant characteristics of an economic system.

II
(Answer TWO — one hour)

  1. What is the relation, if any, of Marx’s “Tendency toward concentration and centralization of capital,” to monopoly problems as now understood?
  2. What elements of Marx’s thought impress you as having been influenced by the writing of his Utopian predecessors?
  3. On the basis of Marxian analysis how would you judge the political future of a farmer-labor affiliation in the United States?

III
(Answer TWO — one hour)

  1. “Take away the labor theory of value and the whole of Marx’s gigantic structure crashes to the ground.” Discuss.
  2. In your judgment does the rise of fascism in post-war Europe tend to confirm or refute Lenin’s theory of imperialism?
  3. “Mises is wrong; Lange and Taylor are right. But the whole dispute is very much a tempest in a teacup. It has very little to do with either the desirability or the workability of a socialist society.” What dispute? Do you agree that “Mises is wrong; Lange and Taylor are right”? What is your own judgment as to the importance of the dispute?

Final. 1939.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Papers Printed for Final Examinations, History, History of Religions, … ,Economics, … , Military Science, Naval Science. Jan—June, 1939. (HUC 7000.28, in Box 4 of 284)

 

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard

Harvard. Laughlin’s 310 Examination Questions, 1884

 

J. Laurence Laughlin published an abridged version of John Stuart Mill’s Principles of Economics in 1884 after five years of using Mill’s Principles as his political economy textbook at Harvard. He added “critical, bibliographical, and explanatory notes, and a sketch of the history of political economy”. Given Laughlin’s important role as founding head of the department of political economy at the University of Chicago, his selection of 310 examination questions provides us a convenient list of economic concepts and ideas that were taught in a first course in economics at a leading American university in the 1880s.

_________________

 

APPENDIX II.
EXAMINATION QUESTIONS.

The following problems and questions have been arranged to indicate to the reader the character of examinations set by English [See Milnes’s “Problems in Political Economy.”] and American universities. They have been taken in each case from papers actually given. It is hardly necessary to state, perhaps, that these questions do not exhaust the subject, and are only some of a kind of which many more might be added:

 

Definitions.

  1. Define briefly, Fixed Capital; Unproductive Consumption; Law of Diminishing Returns; Effective Desire of Accumulation; Law of Increase of Labor; Communism; Wages Fund; “Wages of Superintendence; Real Wages; Value; Price; Demand; Medium of Exchange; Gresham’s Law.
  2. Explain carefully the following terms: Productive Consumption, Effectual Demand, Margin of Cultivation, Cost of Production, Value of Money, Cost of Labor, Wealth, and Abstinence.
  3. Explain the following term: Real Wages, Fixed Capital, Allowance System, Margin of Cultivation, Price, Demand, Medium of Exchange, Seignorage, Value of Money, and Bill of Exchange.
  4. Define Supply, Value of Money, Productive Consumption, Cost of Production, Cost of Labor, Exchange Value, Law of Production from Land, Rate of Profit, Capital, and Gresham’s Law.
  5. Define Political Economy: State the parts into which it may be divided, and show how they are mutually related.

 

Labor.

  1. Distinguish between direct and indirect labor, and give an illustration of the distinction.
  2. Apply the distinction between productive and unproductive labor, and productive and unproductive consumption, respectively, to each of the following persons: a tailor, an architect, an annuitant, a sailor, and a brick-layer.
  3. Is an actor to he classed as a productive laborer? The inventor of a machine? A confectioner?
  4. In which of the two classes of laborers, productive and unproductive, would you place the following?

(1.) The officers of our Government.
(2.) The maker of an organ.
(3.) An organist.
(4.) A schoolmaster.
(5.) An artist.
(6.) He who makes an article for which there is no use.

  1. Classify as productive or unproductive the following laborers: a clergyman, musical-instrument maker, actor, soldier, and lace-maker.

 

Capital.

  1. Explain fully what you understand by capital, and what function it discharges in production. Consider whether or not the following ought to be included in capital: (1) the original and acquired powers of the laborer, (2) the original properties of the soil, (3) improvements on land, (4) credit, (5) unsold stock in the hands of a merchant, (6) articles purchased but still in the consumer’s hands.
  2. Does a national loan add to the capital of a country?
  3. Inquire how far, or in what cases, or in what sense, it may be said that a common dwelling-house, an hotel, a school-house, a police-station, a theatre, and a fortification, constitute part of the capital of the country.
  4. Discuss carefully the question whether money lying in a bank (or corn lying in a granary) is always capital, or whether its economic nature depends upon the intentions of the owner.
  5. Are railway-shares, stocks of wine, wheat, munitions of war, and land, to be considered capital, or not?
  6. Explain fully whether you consider that United States bonds are capital or not.
  7. Is an investment in government funds capital, or not? Give your reasons.
  8. In what manner does a large expenditure for military purposes affect the operations of capital and labor?
  9. Distinguish between wealth and capital. Show that there is no assignable limit to the employment of capital in bettering the condition of the members of a community.
  10. “If there are human beings capable of work, and food to feed them, they may always be employed in producing something.” Explain the meaning of this fully.
  11. What is meant by saying wealth can only perform the functions of capital by being wholly or partially consumed?
  12. Explain and illustrate the statement that demand for commodities is not demand for labor.
  13. Show that expenditure of money does not necessarily increase the demand for labor.
  14. In what way would a general demand for luxuries affect productive laborers and the wealth of the community?
  15. In a community where capital is all employed, what would be the effect if one employer gradually withdrew some of his capital, and spent this for personal luxuries?
  16. It is contended that “the demand for commodities, which can only be got by labor, is as much a demand for labor as a demand for beef is a demand for bullocks.” Criticise this position.
  17. “It is often said that, though employment is withdrawn from labor in one department, an exactly equivalent employment is opened for it in others, because what the consumers save in the increased cheapness of one particular article enables them to augment their consumption of others, thereby increasing the demand for other kinds of labor.” Point out the fallacy.
  18. A college undergraduate, with the applause of shopkeepers, bought twenty waistcoats, under the plea that he was doing good to trade. Examine the economical soundness of his act.
  19. A man invested a portion of his capital in a loan to a state which subsequently repudiated its debts. The man thereupon gave up his carriage, discharged superfluous gardeners, and reduced the number of his domestic servants. Examine the effect of these changes on the employment of labor in the district where he resides.
  20. In the sixteenth century a great change in the mode of expenditure took place. Retainers were dismissed, households were reduced and a demand for commodities was substituted for a demand for labor. How would this change affect wages, and why?
  21. It is supposed by some persons that expenditure by the rich in costly entertainments is good for trade. What is your opinion on the subject?
  22. A is an absentee who spends his income abroad. B spends his income chiefly on American pictures and other works of art. C spends most of his income on American servants. D saves and buys United States bonds. E employs most of his income in the production of manufactures. Explain the various effects of these different modes of expenditure on the amount of wealth in the United States, and on the working-classes of the country.
  23. Compare the economic effects of defraying war expenditure (1) by loans, (2) by increased taxation.
  24. Define the term capital, and distinguish between fixed and circulating capital, giving instances of each.
  25. Distinguish between fixed and circulating capital, and point out how far, or in what manner, each of the following articles belongs to one kind or the other: a dwelling-house, a crop of corn, a wagon, a load of coal, an ingot of gold, a railway-engine, a bale of cotton goods.
  26. Of the following, which would you class under fixed and which under circulating capital: cash in the hands of a merchant, a cotton-mill, a plow, diamonds in a jeweler’s shop, a locomotive, a nursery-gardener’s seeds, greenhouses, manures; a carpenter’s tools, woods, nails?
  27. If in a country like this a large amount of capital becomes fixed in the building of railroads, what effect will this change taken by itself have upon the laboring-class, supposing the capital to be (1) domestic, or (2) borrowed wholly or in part from abroad?
  28. “What conclusion is reached by Mr. Mill respecting the objections to the use of labor-saving machinery?
  29. Is the extension of machinery beneficial to laborers?
  30. What is “the conclusive answer to the objections against machinery”?

 

Efficiency of Production.

  1. Explain briefly the chief causes on which the productiveness of labor depends.
  2. What are the principal ways in which advantage arises from the division of labor?
  3. What are the principal advantages of division of labor? In what cases and why is it better to carry on a productive enterprise on a large scale?
  4. Under what circumstances, and in what callings, can the division of employment be carried out to the fullest extent?
  5. Show how the amount of available capital and the extent of the market for products limit division of labor.

 

Population.

  1. Give a brief statement of Malthus’s theory of population, explaining the different checks on population in different stages of civilization.
  2. Enunciate Malthus’s law of population, and give an outline of the reasoning by which he established it. Give an account of any objections that have been brought against Malthus’s position, and criticise those objections.
  3. When the growth of population outstrips the progress of improvements, what are the means of relief for the laborer?
  4. Does the increased facility of emigration nullify the Malthusian law of population in your opinion or not, and why?
  5. Explain the law of diminishing return and the Malthusian doctrine of population; and trace the connection between them.

 

Increase of Production.

  1. Compare the motives to saving in the case of savages, and of a country like the United States. State the causes of diversity in the strength of the effective desire of accumulation.
  2. Capital is said to be accumulated by saving; what is saving? Is hoarded money a saving while hoarded?
  3. How far does the increasing productiveness of manufacturing industry tend to neutralize the effect on profits of the diminishing productiveness of agricultural industry?
  4. “What conclusion as to the limit to the increase of production does Mr. Mill deduce from his investigation of the laws of the various requisites of production?

 

Property.

  1. “What are the essential elements of property? Are the grounds of property in land the same as those of property in movables?
  2. Give what you conceive to be the chief arguments in favor of the institution of private property, as opposed to common ownership.
  3. What arguments does Mr. Mill suggest in favor of some redistribution of landed property?
  4. What are the economic arguments for and against Communism?
  5. In what way, and by what means, do Socialists want to alter the present distribution of wealth?
  6. Sketch the principal forms of Communistic and Non-communistic Socialism.
  7. Should the power of bequest be limited?

 

Wages.

  1. On what, according to Mill, does the rate of wages depend? Hence, show the fallacy of the popularly proposed remedies for low wages.
  2. State and examine the principal theories which have been put forward as to the circumstances which regulate the general rate of wages, saying which you deem to be correct, and why so.
  3. Mr. Thornton argues that the wages-fund is neither “determined” nor “limited”: not “determined,” because there is no “law” to compel capitalists to devote any portion of their wealth to the payment of labor, nor are they morally “bound” to do so; and not “limited,” because there is nothing to prevent them from adding to the portion of their wealth so applied. Criticise this argument, and, if you dissent from Mr. Thornton’s view, state the causes which “determine” and “limit” the fund in question.
  4. State precisely what you mean by the “wages-fund,” and explain the conditions on which its growth depends.
  5. Explain generally the circumstances which determine the rate of wages. Mention some of the reasons why wages should be higher in one occupation than in another.
  6. In what way does dearness or cheapness of food affect money wages?
  7. What determines —

(1.) The general rate of wages in a country?
(2.) The relative rates of wages in different employments?

  1. What causes different rates of wages in different employments, and by what methods might wages be raised?
  2. How do you explain the fact that some of the most disagreeable kinds of labor are the most badly paid?
  3. What, according to Mr. Mill, are the most promising means for the improvement of the laboring-classes?
  4. In the Island of Laputa a law was passed compelling each workman to work with his left hand tied behind his back, and the law was justified on the ground that the demand for labor was more than doubled by it. Examine this argument.
  5. Some coal-workers are calling for a diminution of the output of coal, so as to keep up their wages. Examine how far, if at all, this result would follow from their proposed action.
  6. Discuss any remedies for low wages that have been or might be suggested.
  7. Why are the wages of women habitually lower than those of men?

 

Profits.

  1. What is the cause of the existence of profits? And what, according to Mr. Mill, are the circumstances which determine the respective shares of the laborer and the capitalist?
  2. (1.) What is the lowest rate of profit which can permanently exist? (2.) Why is this minimum variable?
  3. Analyze the remuneration received by any of the following: (1) the proprietor of a cotton-mill managing his own mill; (2) a merchant conducting his own business; (3) a railway shareholder; (4) a holder of government funds.
  4. Into what portions may we divide the return which is usually called profit? Which of these portions would he received by a merchant carrying on business with borrowed capital?
  5. Analyze the payment called profits into its various elements. Point out in what respects the earnings of the employer differ from or resemble the wages paid to other classes of laborers.
  6. It is asserted that “profits tend to an equality.” What conditions must be satisfied before this position can be maintained?
  7. How is the alleged tendency of profits to equivalence in different employments to be reconciled with the notorious difference in the profit of different individuals?
  8. “Which one of the elements in profit has the greatest effect on its amount? Explain by comparing the causes which regulate each element.
  9. How does Mill reconcile the high wages in America with Ricardo’s law of profits?
  10. Explain the proposition that the rate of profits depends on the cost of labor, stating carefully what elements are included in cost of labor.
  11. Explain what connection there may be between an increase of population and any of the elements entering into cost of labor.
  12. What effect would an increase or diminution of population have upon cost of labor?
  13. Explain Mill’s view as to the cost of labor being a function of three variables, considering the passages in which he says, 1. “If without labor becoming less efficient its remuneration fell, no increase taking place in the cost of the articles composing that remuneration;” 2. “If the laborer obtained a higher remuneration, without any increased cheapness in the things composing it; or if, without his obtaining more, that which he did obtain would become more costly”: profits in all these cases would suffer a diminution; and discussing — Firstly, if the remuneration of labor falls, what can the cost of the articles composing that remuneration signify to the capitalist? Secondly, if the laborer gets a higher remuneration, what can the increased cheapness of the things composing it signify to the capitalist?
  14. Is the contest between capital and labor permanent and fundamental? If not, give your reasons for your answer.
  15. What is the effect on wages and profits of the introduction of machinery?

 

Rent.

  1. “What connection exists between the law of Malthus and Ricardo’s doctrine of rent?
  2. “What is the reason why land-owners can demand rent?
  3. Explain and illustrate the distinction between rent and profits. In what cases are they nearly indistinguishable?
  4. It has often been observed that in America land is much less highly cultivated than in England. Explain the economic reasons for this.
  5. How does the theory of rent apply in a country like the United States, where the farmer owns his land instead of hiring it?
  6. How is it that some agricultural capital pays rent, even if resort is not had to different grades of land?
  7. Give a brief description of the theory of rent, and point out to what payments not usually called rent the theory may be applied.
  8. State briefly Ricardo’s theory of rent, and show that, if it be true, the following statements of Adam Smith must be false:

“The most fertile coal-mine regulates the price of coals at all the other mines in the neighborhood.”
“In the price of corn one part pays the rent of the landlord, another pays the wages, and another the profit of the farmer.”

  1. Why does the farming business pay rent, and the cotton business (ground-rent excluded) pay none? Define rent.
  2. “As population increases, rents estimated in corn increase, and the price of corn rises; rents, therefore, doubly tend to increase.” Prove this.
  3. Professor Rogers adduces, in refutation of the common theory of rent, the fact that land near New York pays a high rent, while land of the same natural fertility in the Western States pays no rent. How far do you admit the force of this objection?
  4. Examine the following doctrine:

“If invention and improvement still go on, the efficiency of labor will be further increased, and the amount of labor and capital necessary to produce a given result further diminished. The same causes will lead to the utilization of this new gain in productive power for the production of more wealth; the margin of cultivation will be again extended, and rent will increase, both in proportion and amount, without any increase in wages and interest. And so, . . . will . . . rent constantly increase, though population should remain stationary.” — Henry George, “Progress and Poverty” (p. 226).

  1. What answer is made to Mr. Carey’s objection to Ricardo’s theory of rent, that in point of fact the poorer, not the richer, lands are first brought under cultivation?
  2. Explain how land, “even apart from differences of situation, . . . would all of it, on a certain supposition, pay rent.”
  3. Explain clearly how it is possible for the land of a country which is all of uniform fertility to pay rent.
  4. “If the earth had a perfectly smooth surface the same everywhere, and if it were all tilled and cultivated in exactly the same way, there would be no such thing as rent.” Examine this proposition.
  5. Show that rent does not increase the price of bread.
  6. How is it shown that “rent does not really form any part of the expenses of production or of the advances of the capitalist?”
  7. (1.) What connection exists between the price of agricultural products and the amount of rent paid? (2.) Can rent affect the price?
  8. “Rent is the effect and not the cause of price.” Prove this.
  9. Does rent enter into the cost of production of the following commodities or not, and why: Corn, cloth, the wine of the best vineyards?
  10. “Rent arises from the difference between the least fertile and the most fertile soils, and from the fact that the former have been taken into cultivation. . . . Rent is the difference between the market price of produce and the cost of production.” Harmonize these statements.
  11. In order that the actual payments made by farmers to landlords should generally correspond with “economic rent,” what conditions must be observed?
  12. “What is assumed, as to competition, in all Mr. Mill’s reasoning on wages, profits, and rent? Explain its action in each case.

 

Value.

  1. Enumerate, compare, and criticise any opinions known to you which have been held concerning the nature, origin, or measure of value in exchange.
  2. Define precisely what it is which gives value to objects, and point out the causes which vary the value of the same object under differing circumstances.
  3. Do men dive to the bottom of the sea to get pearls because they are valuable; or are pearls valuable because men must dive to the bottom of the sea to get them?
  4. There are three forms of difficulty of attainment. State the law of value applicable to each.
  5. Explain the exact economic meaning of the words supply and demand.
  6. When it is said that the value of certain commodities depends upon supply and demand, what is meant by demand?
  7. If the supply of all commodities were suddenly doubled, would any changes in their relative values ensue or not, and why?
  8. State the laws which regulate the permanent and temporary values of agricultural products.
  9. How far does the value of commodities depend on the quantity of labor required for their production?
  10. Has the term exchange value any precise meaning when we are comparing times or places very remote from one another?
  11. What is meant by the natural (or normal) price and the market price of commodities? To what extent can they differ?
  12. Does a general rise of wages raise the prices of commodities in general or not, and why? Does it tend to cause any change in the relative prices of commodities or not, and why?
  13. Suppose that wages were double, would the values of commodities be affected? What would be the effect on prices and profits of such an increase of wages?
  14. Are wages and profits influenced by prices?
  15. Can employers recoup themselves by a rise of prices for a rise of—

(a.) Wages in particular employments?
(b.) General wages? How does this question bear on the efficacy of trades-unionism?

  1. Do values depend on wages?
  2. Explain the following statement: “It is true the absolute wages paid have no effect upon values; but neither has the absolute quantity of labor.”
  3. Explain the statement that “high general profits can not, any more than high general wages, be a cause of high values. … In so far as profits enter into the cost of production of all things, they can not affect the value of any.”
  4. Explain fully why it is that capitalists can not compensate themselves for a general high cost of labor through any action on values and prices.
  5. “The value of a commodity depends on its cost of production.” Under what conditions is this true, and what causes interfere with it?
  6. Describe the hindrances which impede the free movement of capital to those fields which apparently offer the highest return for its employment.
  7. Give J. S. Mill’s analysis of the “cost of production,” and also Professor Cairnes’s, with the arguments for and against each.
  8. Analyze cost of production. What is its connection with cost of labor?
  9. Give an analysis of cost of production of any commodity.
  10. Show carefully the distinction between wages, cost of labor, and cost of production.
  11. Define clearly value, price, real wages, and cost of production.
  12. Define real wages, money wages, cost of labor.

 

Money.

  1. Point out the difference between the scientific and popular conceptions implied in the terms wealth and money.
  2. Show the fallacy of confounding capital with money. Can there be a glut of capital?
  3. “What is money? To what sort of necessity does it owe its existence? What articles have been used for money? Enumerate the qualities which render a commodity fit to serve as money.
  4. “What are the qualities requisite in any commodity in order that it may serve as money?
  5. Distinguish accurately between the functions of money.
  6. How far is a fixed standard of value possible?
  7. “What effect does the great durability of gold and silver have upon the value of money?
  8. How far does the law of demand and supply govern the value of money?
  9. Explain fully how it is that the value of the precious metals is affected by “questions of quantity only, with little reference to cost of production.”
  10. What is to be said to the following: “Some political economists have objected altogether to the statement that the value of money depends on its quantity combined with the rapidity of circulation; which, they think, is assuming a law for money that does not exist for any other commodity”?
  11. Under what conditions is it true that the “value of money is inversely as its quantity”?
  12. Explain carefully the following: “The average value of gold is made to conform to its natural value in the same manner as the values of other things are made to conform to their natural value.”
  13. In what various meanings is the phrase “the value of money” used? How far does the value of money in each of these meanings depend on (1) the cost of production, (2) supply and demand?
  14. Are the values of gold and silver subject to exactly the same natural laws as other commodities?
  15. Give the explanations and qualifications required to render the following proposition true: “The quantity of coin in every country is regulated by the value of the commodities which are to be circulated by it.”
  16. “Would the world be richer if every individual in it suddenly found the quantity of money in his possession doubled?
  17. How far, or in what way, do you consider it correct to say that the general level of prices in a country depends upon the quantity of gold coin existing in that country?
  18. A single good harvest causes a considerable fall in the value of wheat; but a great addition to the year’s supply of gold from the mines produces little effect on its general value. How do you account for the difference?
  19. Show the effect of establishing a double standard.
  20. Show how Gresham’s law is illustrated by the history of the currency in the United States between 1834 and 1873.
  21. What effect had the discovery of gold in this century upon the coinage of the United States?
  22. What is the system upon which the small silver currency of the United States is coined and issued?
  23. State briefly the aim of the United States coinage act of 1853.

 

Credit.

  1. How do you define credit? Form a classification of credit documents.
  2. It has been said that “credit is capital.” Is this so or not?
  3. Define capital, and examine the meaning of the term in the following statements:

(a.) Demand for commodities can not create capital.
(b.) Credit is not a creation, but a transfer of capital.
(c.) Wages depend upon the proportion between population and capital.

  1. State the law of the value of money which governs general prices. What change is to be made in the statement, if credit is to be taken into consideration?
  2. What is the part which instruments of credit, other than banknotes, play in the exchange of commodities?
  3. Mention some of the principal features of a credit crisis.
  4. What are inconvertible notes? What objections are thereto currency of this description?
  5. Can an inconvertible currency be made to maintain the same value as a convertible currency, and, if so, how? Supposing that it can, what objections are there, nevertheless, to it?
  6. “Nothing is subject to more variation than paper money, even when it is limited, and has no guarantees; for this simple reason, that, having no value of its own, it depends on the idea that each person forms of those guarantees.” Comment on this passage.
  7. How is it that a bad dollar does the work of buying as well as a good one until it is found out? Is it that it makes no difference whether it is made of gold or not?
  8. To what extent is a government capable of giving fictitious value to a paper or a metallic currency?
  9. In a country with an inconvertible paper currency, how can it be determined whether the issues are excessive or not, and why?
  10. What will be the effect if the circulating medium of a country is increased beyond its natural amount —

(1) when the medium is coin?
(2) when it is coin and convertible paper?
(3) when it is inconvertible paper?

  1. What is the error involved in the assumption, frequently made by writers and public speakers, that the currency of a country ought to increase in like ratio with its wealth and population?
  2. On what does the desire to use credit depend? What connection exists between the amount of notes and coin in circulation and the use of credit?
  3. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of a metallic and paper currency.
  4. A member of Congress advocated expansion of the paper currency by the following argument: “Our currency, as well as everything else, must keep pace with our growth as a nation. . . . France has a circulation per capita of thirty dollars; England, of twenty-five; and we, with our extent of territory and improvements, certainly require more than either.” State your opinion of this argument.
  5. Trace the effects, immediate and ultimate, on general prices of (a) an extended system of credit, (b) an enlarged issue of paper money, and (c) an addition to the stock of precious metals, respectively.
  6. What is the error in the common notion that “a paper currency can not be issued in excess so long as every note represents property, or has a foundation of actual property to rest on”?
  7. Explain the action of the check and clearing-house system, and state what is meant by the restoration of barter.

 

Over-Production.

  1. State the relation between supply and demand as aggregates, e. g., between the aggregate supply of commodities in a given community and the aggregate demand for them, and show the bearing of the principle involved on the doctrine of “general over-production.”
  2. Prove that the increase of capital and the extension of industry can not lead to a general over-production of commodities.
  3. What is the error of those who believe in the danger of overproduction?
  4. Distinguish “excess of supply” from a “commercial crisis.”
  5. Give the substance of Mill’s examination of the theories of excess of supply.
  6. “When production is fully equal to consumption, every discovery in the arts, or in mechanics, is a calamity, because it only adds to the enjoyment of consumers the opportunity of obtaining commodities at a cheaper rate, while it deprives the producers of even life itself.” Discuss this opinion of Sismondi.
  7. Explain the difference in the theories of Dr. Chalmers and Mr. Mill on over-production, and the excess of supply.

 

Peculiar Cases of Value.

  1. It costs as much to produce straw as to produce grain; how, then, do you explain the comparatively low value of straw?
  2. Suppose a considerable rise in the price of wool to be foreseen, how should farmers expect the prices of mutton to be affected, and why?
  3. Explain the operation of the laws of value by which the relative prices of wool and mutton are regulated.

 

International Trade and Values.

  1. What is the meaning of the statement that “it is not a difference in the absolute cost of production which determines the interchange [of commodities between countries], but a difference in the comparative cost”?
  2. What are the advantages which a country derives from foreign trade?
  3. Explain clearly the following passage: “We may often, by trading with foreigners, obtain their commodities at a smaller expense of labor and capital than they cost to the foreigners themselves.”
  4. Is there any essential difference between trade between country and country, and trade between county and county, or even between man and man? What is the real nature of trade in all cases?
  5. Why is it necessary to make any different statement of the laws of value for foreign than for domestic products? What is the cause for the existence of any international trade?
  6. How would a serious decline in the efficiency of England, as compared with other countries, in the production of manufactures affect the scale of money incomes and prices in England, and why?
  7. Mr. Mill refers the value of home products to the “cost of production “; of foreign products to the “cost of acquisition.” Examine the truth of this distinction.
  8. It is said that in the home market the value of commodities depends on the cost of production, in the foreign market on the cost of acquisition. Comment on this distinction.
  9. Is the cost of production the regulator of international values?
  10. Discuss the following statement: “International value is regulated just as inter-provincial or inter-parishional value is. Coals and hops are exchanged between Northumberland and Kent on absolutely the same principles as iron and wine between Lancashire and Spain.” — Ruskin, “Munera Pulveris,” p. 84.
  11. “What determines the value of imported commodities?
  12. “Why does cost of production fail to determine the value of commodities brought from a foreign country? Does it also fail in the case of commodities brought from distant parts of the same country?
  13. It is on the matter of fact that there is not much migration of capital and labor from country to country that Mr. Mill has based his whole doctrine of “international trade and international values.” Explain and comment on the above statement.
  14. “What are the causes which determine for a nation the cost of its imports?
  15. It follows from the theory of international values, as laid down by Mill, that the permanent residence of Americans in Europe may enhance the cost of foreign imports to Americans residing at home. Explain in what way.
  16. Suppose two countries, A and B, isolated from the rest of the world, and a trade established between them. In consequence of the labor of A becoming less effective, the cost of production of every article which can be produced in that country is greatly increased, but so that the relation between the costs of any two articles remains the same. “What, if any, will be the effect of the change on the trade between A and B? Does your answer depend upon your using the phrase “cost of production” in a sense different from that given to it by some economists?
  17. Show that every country gets its imports at less cost in proportion to the efficiency of its labor.

 

Foreign Exchanges.

  1. “What is the ordinary limit to the premium on foreign bills of exchange, and why?
  2. What are the chief effects on the foreign exchanges which are produced by the breaking out of a war? Account for the fact that in 1861 the exchanges on England in America fell considerably below specie point.
  3. Suppose that the next harvest in England should be very defective, and extraordinary supplies of American grain needed, now would this probably affect the price of bills of exchange between England and America, and the profit on the exportation of English manufactures to the latter, and why?
  4. Trace the process by which the precious metals spread from the mines over the world.
  5. Suppose the exchange between England and the United States to be heavily against England, how will this fact affect the export and import trade between the two countries, and why?
  6. “What is meant by exchanges being against a country?
  7. Enumerate the principal circumstances which affect the rate of exchange between two countries. How is the par of exchange ascertained?
  8. In what way are gold and silver distributed among the different trading countries? Between different parts of the same country?
  9. Trace the effects of large and continuous issues of inconvertible paper currency on the prices of commodities, on importation and exportation, and on the foreign exchanges.
  10. State the conditions under which international trade can permanently exist. “What will be the ultimate effect of a large movement of foreign gold upon prices, imports, and exports in the receiving country?
  11. State the theory of the value of money (i. e., “metallic money”), and clear up any apparent inconsistencies between the following statements: (1.) The value of money depends on the cost of production at the worst mines; (2.) The value of money varies inversely as its quantity multiplied by its rapidity of circulation; (3.) The countries whose products are most in demand abroad and contain the greatest value in the smallest bulk, which are nearest the mines and have the least demand for foreign productions, are those in which money will be of lowest value.
  12. The effects of the depreciation of the paper currency in the United States are thus described by Mr. Wells: “It renders it impossible to sell abroad the products which have cost too much at home, and invites from other countries the products of a cheaper labor paid for in a sounder currency. It exaggerates imports, while destroying our ability to pay in kind.” State how far you agree with the deductions here drawn, assigning your reasons where you differ.
  13. “When the foreign exchanges are manifestly against a country, and a balance of indebtedness is the cause, the equilibrium can be restored in two ways. State and explain the operation of each.
  14. What are the conditions which determine for a country a high range of general prices? How far is this advantageous?
  15. “What is the effect of the imposition of a tribute by one country on another upon the course of trade between them, and the terms on which they exchange commodities; and why?
  16. For what reasons may a nation’s exports habitually exceed or fall short of its imports?
  17. Explain the real and nominal exchange.
  18. Expound Mr. Mill’s theory of the influence which a convertible currency exercises on foreign trade.
  19. “What is the effect of a depreciated currency on (1) foreign trade, and (2) the exchanges?

 

Interest.

  1. How does the general rate of interest determine the selling price of stocks and land?
  2. Is there any relation between the rate of interest and the value of money?
  3. What are the relations of interest and profit? On what causes does the rate of interest depend?
  4. “High interest means bad security.” Comment on this saying.
  5. Is the rate of interest affected by the supply of the precious metals?
  6. What determines the rate of interest on the loanable funds? Is the “current [or ordinary] rate of interest the measure of the relative abundance or scarcity of capital”?
  7. What are the chief causes that determine the rate of interest?
  8. If it be true that in America every man, however rich, is engaged in some business, but that in England many rich men have no trade or profession, how is the rate of interest in each country affected in consequence, and why?
  9. How does a fall in the purchasing power of money tend to affect, if at all, and why, (1) the rate of interest, (2) the price of land, (3) the price of government bonds, (4) the price of gold and silver ornaments and plate?

 

Foreign Competition.

  1. Explain the grounds of Mr. Mill’s proposition that general low wages never caused any country to undersell its rivals, nor did general high wages ever hinder it from doing so. If you think the proposition needs qualification, give your reason.
  2. (1.) What is the true theory of one country underselling another in a foreign market? (2.) What weight should be attributed to the fact of generally higher or lower wages in one of the competing countries?
  3. Discuss the question whether a high rate of wages necessarily lays the commerce of a country under a disadvantage with reference to a country where the rate of wages is lower.
  4. What are the conditions under which one country can permanently undersell another in a foreign market?
  5. Point out distinctly the connection between the money wages of laborers in the United States and the productiveness of the soil.
  6. In the Eastern States iron-molders earn from fourteen to seventeen dollars a week; in California their wages run from twenty-one to twenty-seven dollars. Account for this variation.

 

Progress of Society.

  1. What are the reasons for the change in the normal values of manufactured and of agricultural commodities, respectively, during the progress of society?
  2. Wages and profits in different employments and neighborhoods are not uniformly proportional to the efforts of labor and abstinence of which they are the respective rewards. Classify the circumstances which prevent this correspondence, and show how far their effect is likely to be reduced (a) by general economical progress, and (b) by the extension of the division of labor.
  3. What is the law of diminishing returns? Can you point out any connection between this law and the following phenomena? —

(a.) Density of population.
(b.) Rate of wages.
(c.) Rate of profits in different countries.

  1. Sketch the influence on rents and profits of an increase of population and capital concurrently with a stationary state of the arts of production.
  2. Is there reason to believe that Mr. Mill has underrated the powers possessed by man of extending the area of production and facilitating the market of food? If such a statement has been made, to what extent is his theory of population modified, and the risks he had indicated rendered distant?
  3. Compare the effects on rent, profits, and wages, of a sudden improvement in the production (a) of food, (b) of some manufactured articles largely consumed by the working-classes.
  4. Trace the connection between Ricardo’s theory of rent and the decline in the general rate of profits as a country increases in population. Explain clearly the connection which exists between wages and profits.
  5. What effect is produced upon rents, profits, and wages, respectively, in a country like France, where population is stationary and capital advancing?
  6. If capital continued to increase and population did not, explain the proposition that “the whole savings of each year would be exactly so much subtracted from the profits of the next and of every following year,” if improvements were stationary.
  7. How does social and industrial progress tend to affect the prices of land, raw produce, and manufactures, respectively, and why?
  8. The capitalized value of land rises, in the progress of society, from two causes — from one which affects land in common with all investments; from another which is peculiar to land.
  9. “The tendency of improved communications is to lower existing rents.” How far is this true, and in what directions is it true?
  10. What would be the effect on profits, wages, and rents of an improvement in a manufactured article consumed by the laboring-class?
  11. Explain the doctrine of the tendency of profits to a minimum, the cause of that tendency, and the circumstances which counteract it.
  12. What was Adam Smith’s doctrine as to the decline of profit in progressive communities? Criticise his argument.
  13. Mention some of the principal causes which, in the ordinary progress of society, respectively tend to increase or to reduce the current rate of profits.
  14. Why do profits tend to fall as population increases, and how may this result be retarded or prevented?
  15. What is the effect of a general rise of money wages, apart from the consideration of a greater efficiency of labor, in prices, profits, and rent? Give reasons for your answer.
  16. How does the general progress of society in wealth and industrial efficiency tend to affect the rate of wages, the rate of profit, and the rate of rent, respectively?
  17. What is the general effect of the progress of society on the landowner, the capitalist, and the laborer?

 

Future of Laboring-Classes.

  1. Examine the influences of machinery on the economic condition of the working-classes.
  2. Mention and discuss some of the popular remedies for low wages, and especially the effect of the subdivision of landed property among peasant proprietors.
  3. Explain briefly what is meant by co-operation, and indicate the more prominent forms assumed by the co-operative movement.
  4. What is meant by the co-operative system of industry? Show ways in which this system may affect, for good or for evil, the productiveness of labor; and mention any moral benefits, or the opposite, in which it may be expected to issue.
  5. What are the difficulties in the way of co-operation for the production of salable objects?
  6. Explain the advantages of industrial partnership, in which the employés share, in proportion to the wages received, half the profits of the business beyond a certain fixed minimum which is assigned to the employers.

 

Taxation.

  1. How is the state justified in undertaking any manufacture or service which might be performed by private enterprise?
  2. Enumerate Adam Smith’s canons of taxation.
  3. Examine the argument in favor of the resumption by the state of what is called the unearned increment in the value of land arising from the development of society.
  4. A picture by Gainsborough and a house in Broadway are sold in the same year at the same price; at the end of fifty years each sells for five times its first cost. Is there any, and, if so, what, reason why the increase should be sequestrated for the public benefit in the one case and not in the other?
  5. Explain the incidence of taxes laid on wages.
  6. “Why should a tax on profits, if no improvements follow, fall on the laborer and capitalist?
  7. Explain what effect, if any, will be produced on the price of corn by —

(1) a tax upon rent;
(2) a tithe;
(3) a tax of so much per acre, irrespective of value;
(4) a tax of so much per bushel.

  1. On whom does a tax of a fixed proportion of agricultural produce fall?
  2. Discuss the question whether the income-tax ought to be a tax upon income and property, or upon expenditure.
  3. Discuss the expediency of a graduated income-tax.
  4. State the arguments which you think strongest both for and against exempting savings from the income-tax.
  5. Explain the conditions which should he observed in imposing taxes on commodities.
  6. What taxes does a tradesman get back in the price of the articles he sells, and what does he not?
  7. Test by Adam Smith’s four maxims of taxation the policy of indirect taxes on the necessaries of life.
  8. All indirect taxation violates Adam Smith’s fourth canon.
  9. Discuss the following:

“A man with $100,000 in United States bonds comes to Boston, hires a house . . .; thus he lives in luxury. … I am in favor of taxing idle investments such as this, and allowing manufacturing investments to go untaxed.”

  1. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of direct and indirect taxation.
  2. On what principles is this country now taxed?
  3. Explain the arguments for and against the policy of maintaining a surplus for the purpose of redeeming a national debt.
  4. In estimating the ability of the United States to pay its public debts, it is usual to include among the data of the question the increased productiveness of industry in that country. How far is this a pertinent consideration?

 

Protection.

  1. Mention some of the principal arguments brought forward in favor of protective tariffs.
  2. Connect the principle of the division of employments (or labor) with the policy of free trade and the functions of government.
  3. Sketch the effects of discriminating duties, including the operation of the corn laws.
  4. Examine the following argument, emending, if you think it necessary, the free-trader’s doctrine on the point raised: The free- trader’s belief is that a customs duty is added to the price of the article upon which it is imposed. If the article is imported, according to his theory, the increase of the price goes into the public treasury; if the article is made in the country, the increase of the price goes into the pocket of the producer. But in the former case there is no protection; and competition will prevent the latter. Therefore protection does not increase the price of the protected article. If a customs duty is imposed upon a commodity, and its price is not raised in consequence, what inference can you draw?
  5. Under what circumstances did Mr. Mill think nascent states might be justified in adopting a policy of protection? Criticise his opinion, and, if you agree with it, give some examples of its application.
  6. American protectionists allege that the high rate of wages prevailing in the United States disables them from competing with “the pauper labor”of Europe. Examine the grounds of this statement, and consider how far it forms a justification for protection to American industry.
  7. A high rate of wages indicates, not a high, but a low cost of production for all commodities measured in which the rate of wages is high.
    Explain and prove this proposition, and illustrate it from the circumstances of the United States.
  8. State under what limitations the proposition is correct, that profits vary inversely with wages. Explain the circumstances which cause both a higher rate of wages and profits to prevail in a young country, such as the United States, than in England.
  9. In America wages are much higher than in England, yet the general rate of profits is higher also, according to Mr. Mill. How do you reconcile the two facts?
  10. Examine the following:

“It seems to me that protection is absolutely essential to the encouragement of capital, and equally necessary for the protection of the American laborer. … He must have good food, enough of it, good clothing, school-houses for his children, comforts for his home, and a fair chance to improve his condition. To this end I would protect him against competition with the half-paid laborers of European countries.” — Congressional Globe.

  1. An American newspaper has said of the burning of Chicago: “The money to replace what has been burned will not be sent abroad to enrich foreign manufacturers; but, thanks to the wise policy of protection which has built up American industries, it will stimulate our own manufactures, set our mills running faster, and give employment to thousands of idle working-men.” Comment on this passage.
  2. On whom does a tax on imports, if not prohibitory, fall?
  3. In what cases would duties on imported commodities fall on the producers?
  4. Are taxes on imports in any way paid by foreigners?
  5. Discuss the effects of duties on exports.
  6. Trace the effects of duties on the importation of raw materials, and distinguish, with examples, between duties that violate and duties which do not violate the principle of free trade.
  7. Is it possible for any country by legislative enactments to engross a larger share of the advantages of foreign trade than it would naturally have? Discuss the question fully.
  8. “Those are, therefore, in the right who maintain that taxes on imports are partly paid by foreigners; but they are mistaken when they say it is by the foreign producer. It is not on the person from whom we buy, but on all those who buy from us, that a portion of our customs duties spontaneously falls.” Explain and examine the reasons for this conclusion.
  9. State the principle which determines the relation between the amount of a country’s imports and that of its exports, and show how this relation is affected by a system of protective duties.

 

Source: Appendix II in Principles of Political Economy by John Stuart Mill. Abridged, with Critical, Bibliographical, and Explanatory Notes, and a Sketch of the History of Political Economy by J. Laurence Laughlin (New York: Appleton, 1884), pp. 637-658.

Image Source: James Laurence Laughlin. University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf1-03687, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.

 

 

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard

Harvard. Exam questions for Mason and Leontief’s Marxian economics course, 1937

 

Course listings and enrollment data for the course, “Karl Marx”, that was offered three times in the 1930’s at the Harvard economics department have been posted earlier along with Wassily Leontief’s own draft outline. Before posting below the only set of final examination questions for this course that I have been able to locate, I think it is most interesting to read what Leontief thought about Marx as expressed in his 1938 paper. I have highlighted a terrific obiter dictum in Leontief’s conclusion in which he characterizes much of present-day theorizing as “purely derivative”. Still, Marx hardly comes away unbloodied: “these theories in general do not hold water”.

__________________

 Leontief’s conclusion to his 1938 article on Marxian economics

“Neither his analytical accomplishments nor the purported methodological superiority can explain the Marxian record of correct prognostications. His strength lies in realistic, empirical knowledge of the capitalist system.

Repeated experiments have shown that in their attempts to prognosticate individual behavior, professional psychologists systematically fall behind experienced laymen with a knack for “character reading.” Marx was the great character reader of the capitalist system. As many individuals of this type, Marx had also his rational theories, but these theories in general do not hold water. Their inherent weakness shows up as soon as other economists not endowed with the exceptionally realistic sense of the master try to proceed on the basis of his blueprints.

The significance of Marx for modern economic theory is that of an inexhaustible source of direct observation. Much of the present-day theorizing is purely derivative, secondhand theorizing. We often theorize not about business enterprises, wages, or business cycles but about other people’s theories of profits, other people’s theories of wages, and other people’s theories of business cycles. If before attempting any explanation one wants to learn what profits and wages and capitalist enterprises actually are, he can obtain in the three volumes of Capital more realistic and relevant first- hand information than he could possibly hope to find in ten successive issues of the United States Census, a dozen textbooks on contemporary economic institutions, and even, may I dare to say, the collected essays of Thorstein Veblen.”

Source: Wassily Leontief. “The Significance of Marxian Economics for Present-Day Economic Theory.” The American Economic Review 28, no. 1 (1938): 1-9.

 

__________________

1936-37
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 1171

Answer THREE or FOUR questions

  1. “The totality of productive relations determines the economic structure of the society; it constitutes the real basis of its juridical and political superstructure which determines also the corresponding forms of social consciousness.” K. Marx, “Introduction to the Critic [sic] of Political Economy.” Interpret.
  2. Marx does not attempt a general definition of a class. If he had given one what elements would he have emphasized?
  3. “Revolution is the inspired frenzy of history.” Is this comment by Trotsky strictly Marxian or must we consider it another of his “deviations”?
  4. Does the doctrine of the “withering away of the state” make the Marxian view of the ultimate form of socialism indistinguishable from anarchism?
  5. Does Marx’s economic system stand and fall with his labor theory of value?
  6. Is the Marxian explanation of the “surplus army of unemployed” essentially identical with the modern theory of technological unemployment?
  7. Discuss the Marxian explanation of business cycles.

Final. 1937.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Papers Printed for Final Examinations, History, History of Religions, … ,Economics, … , Military Science, Naval Science. Jan—June, 1937. (HUC 7000.28, item 79 of 284)

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Regulation of Public Utilities and Transportation. Chamberlin, 1939-40

 

This is the third industrial organization/regulation semester course offered at Harvard in the immediate pre-WWII era. Syllabi and other material have previously been posted for E. S. Mason and P. Sweezy’s “The Corporation and its Regulation” and Mason’s “Industrial Organization and Control”. Edward H. Chamberlin’s teaching portfolio at Harvard included transportation economics from 1931. Here the focus is on regulation of natural monopolies such as public utilities and railroads.

______________________

Course Description, 1940-41

[Economics 63b 2hf. Public Utilities (including Transportation).] Half-course (second half-year). Tu., Th., (at the pleasure of the instructor) Sat., at 12. Professor Chamberlin.
Omitted in 1940-41; to be given in 1941-42.

The regulation of the public utility and transportation industries as a phase of the control over economic activity exercised by the modern state. Rates, service, earnings, efficiency, financial practices, holding companies and consolidations, coordination, national planning, government competition with private enterprise, and public ownership.

Source: Division of History, Government, and Economics Containing an Announcement for 1940-41, Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. XXXVII, No. 51 (August 15, 1940), p. 57.

______________________

Enrollment 1939-40

[Economics] 63b 2hf. Professor Chamberlin.—Public Utilities (including Transportation).

Total 90: 1 Graduate, 43 Seniors, 34 Juniors, 5 Sophomores, 7 Other.

Source: Report of the President of Harvard College, 1939-40, p. 99.

______________________

Economics 63b
1939-40

Reading List

Principal books used:

D. P. Locklin, Economics of Transportation (revised ed.)
Mosher & Crawford, Public Utility Regulation
Wilfred Owen, Highway Economics
G. L. Wilson, [J. M.] Herring, [R. B.] Eutsler, Public Utility Regulation

 

Week

Assignment

1

Development of railroad transportation and regulation to 1920 Locklin, Chs. 1-5, 9, 10

2

Theory of railroad rates — competition and control Locklin, Chs. 7, 14

3

Particular rates, discrimination: railroads Locklin, Chs. 6, 8, 20

4

Particular rates, discrimination: utilities Mosher & Crawford, Introduction and Chs. 17-21

5

Legal and economic criteria for public utilities
Commissions, legislatures and courts
Mosher & Crawford, Ch. 1
Mosher & Crawford, Chs. 2-6
Locklin, Ch. 13

6

Railroad consolidation Locklin, Ch. 11
Jones, Principles of Railway Transportation, Ch. 17
Locklin, Ch. 19, pp. 315-21, 643-42

7

Railroad consolidation, financial regulation
(Hour examination, Thursday, March 21)
Locklin, Chs. 12, 25, 26

8

Public Utility Holding Company
National Power Policy
Wilson, et al. Ch. 11; pp. 310-319, Chs. 15, 16

Vacation

9

Control of investment, general rate level, earnings Mosher & Crawford, Ch. 7
Locklin, Chs. 15-18

10

Control of investment (continued)
Highway transport
Mosher & Crawford, Chs. 8, 9, 16
Owen, whole essay

11

Highway, water and air transport; coordination Locklin, Chs. 33, 34, 31, 35, 36

12

Public ownership Locklin, Ch. 29
Mosher & Crawford, Chs. 32-34 and Conclusion

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Department of Economics. Correspondence & Papers 1902-1950 (UAV.349.10). Box 23, Folder “Course outlines 1935-37-38-42”.

______________________

Reading Period Assignment

Economics 63b: Read one of the following:

  1. First Report of the Federal Coördinator of Transportation, pp. 1-37.
    Fourth Report of the Federal Coördinator of Transportation, pp. 1-60.
    Report—Immediate Relief for Railroads (April, 1938), 19-71 (75th Congress, 3rd Session, House Doc. No. 583).
    Report of Committee Appointed by the President—Recommendations upon the General Transportation Situation (Dec., 1938), pp. 3-64 (Committee on Public Relations of Eastern Railroads).
  2. S. Daggett, Principles of Inland Transportation (revised edition). Chs. 36-37 [3rd edition, 1941].
    Three articles by H. E. Dougall on French Railways in Journal of Political Economy, June, 1933; June, 1934; April, 1938.
    Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science. January, 1939, pp. 185-226.
  3. A. L. Gordon, The Public Corporation in Great Britain, Chs. 1, 3, 4, 6.
  4. Bauer and Gold, Public Utility Valuation for Purposes of Rate Control, pp. 155-362.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in economics, 1895-2003 (HUC 8522.2.1). Box 2, Folder “1939-40 (1 of 2)”.

______________________

1939—1940
HARVARD UNIVERSITY

ECONOMICS 63b2

Write on FIVE questions, including numbers 1 and 6.*

  1. According to what principles do you believe the level of earnings of railroads and utilities should be regulated? Discuss the chief problems arising out of applying your principles to the situation as you find it in the United States.
  2. Contrast and evaluate the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 and the Tennessee Valley Authority as alternative methods of public utility regulation.
  3. What various solutions have been proposed for the strong and weak road problem? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each.
  4. Discuss the possibilities and limitations of reducing the cost of railroad transportation (a) through consolidation or coordination without government ownership; (b) through government ownership.
  5. Do you believe this country should subsidize directly or indirectly any means of transportation? If so, what means, to what extent and why? If not, why not?
  6. Answer the question corresponding to your reading period choice:
    1. (Coördinator’s and other reports) which of the recommendations in the several reports assigned would you consider most relevant to the transportation problem as it appears in 1940? Indicate your own evaluation of them.
    2. (Foreign railways) Contrast the French rate-making scheme set up by the Convention of 1921 with the rate-making arrangement prevailing in the United States after 1920. How do you account for the differences?
    3. (Gordon) “More than any other existing institution in Great Britain, the Central Electricity Board has faced and met a task of economic rationalization on a national scale.” What were the factors which led to a demand for rationalization and how was this rationalization accomplished?
    4. (Bauer and Gold) Discuss any two or three of the chief issues raised by your reading in Bauer and Gold relative to valuation for rate making purposes.

*If you prefer, instead of answering specific questions, you may write a three hour essay describing what you consider to be the chief problems confronting the railroad and utility industries in the United States today and outlining (and defending) a program of legislation to meet them.

Final. 1940.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Final examinations, 1853-2001 (HUC 7000.28) Box 5. Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Papers Printed for Final Examinations: History, History of Religions,…Economics,…,Military Science, Naval Science. June, 1940.

Image Source: Edward H. Chamberlin from Harvard Class Album 1946.

 

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Syllabus and Final Exam for Industrial Organization and Control. Edward S. Mason, 1939-40

 

Following the first term course Economics 61a (The Corporation and its Regulation) that he co-taught with Paul Sweezy, Edward S. Mason taught the following term course Economics 62b (Industrial Organization and Control) that was focussed on market structures and antitrust policies.

Besides being the co-director for the Department of Labor’s studies for the Temporary National Economic Committee (The Online Books Page provides links to TNEC publications), during the immediate period before the U.S. entered WWII he was a consultant  for raw material problems for the Office of Production Management. In 1941 he joined the Office of Strategic Services where he served as the deputy director of the Research and Analysis Branch. This and some of his following government service is discussed in his Oral History Interview  at the Harry S. Truman Library & Museum.

Fun Fact:  John F. Kennedy took this course in the second semester of his senior year (1940).

______________________

Course Description, 1940-41

Economics 62b 2hf. Industrial Organization and Control. Half-course (second half-year). Tu., Th., Sat., at 11. Professor Mason.
Economics 61a is a prerequisite for this course.

This course deals with the nature of monopolistic and competitive markets, the economic problems of large scale enterprises and combinations, the trust problem, and trust policy. Particular attention will be paid to recent changes in our system of industrial control.

Source: Division of History, Government, and Economics Containing an Announcement for 1940-41, Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. XXXVII, No. 51 (August 15, 1940), p. 57.

______________________

Enrollment 1939-40

[Economics] 62b 2hf. Professor Mason.—Industrial Organization and Control.

Total 95: 1 Graduate, 20 Seniors, 53 Juniors, 13 Sophomores, 8 Other.

 

Source: Report of the President of Harvard College, 1939-40, p. 99.

 

______________________

Economics 62b
1939-40

Industrial Organization and Control
Outline and Assignments

 

Week of

Lectures

Assignment

I
THE ECONOMICS OF THE FIRM

1. Feb. 5-10

1. Outline of field.
2. The decline of competition?
3. The problem of monopoly in law and economics.
Burns, Chs. 1, 9.

2. Feb. 12-17

1. The market position of the individual firm.
2. Costs and rate of output.
3. The relation of size to costs.
Hamilton, pp. 320-88, 395-429, 449-500.

3. Feb. 19-24

1. The flexibility of costs.
2. Vacation.
3. Section.
Structure of the American Economy, Chs. 7, 8.

II
TYPES OF INDUSTRIAL MARKETS

4. Feb. 26-March 2

1. Cotton textiles.
2. [continued]
3. The problem of excess capacity.
Whitney, Chs. 2, 3.

5. March 4-9

1. Price discrimination.
2. Bsing point systems and other types of geographical price discrimination.
3. [continued]
Burns, Chs. 6, 7.

6. March 11-16

1. Markets in which sellers are few, agricultural implements.
2. Automobiles.
3. Examination.
Burns, Chs. 3, 4.

7. March 18-23

1. Aluminum.
2. Construction industries.
3. [continued]
Burns, Ch. 5.
Price Research in Steel and Petroleum, Part II.

8. March 20-25

1. Competition between channels of distribution.
2. Non-price competition.
3. Section.
Burns, Ch. 8.
Cassels, Q.J.E.
Chain Stores—Final Report, pp. 23-49.

Vacation

III
GOVERNMENT REGULATION

9.   April 8-13

1. The anti-trust acts.
2. Mergers and restraints of competition.
3. Robinson-Patman Act.
Seager & Gulick, Chs. 17-20.

10. April 15-20

1. Federal Trade Commission.
2. Problem of unfair practices.
3. Bituminous Coal Commission.
Seager & Gulick, Chs. 21-23.

11. April 22-27

1. N.R.A.
2. N.R.A.
3. Section
National Recovery Administration, Chs. 20-24.

12. April 29-May 4

1. Fair trade legislation.
2. Issues in the Monopoly
3. Present status of the monopoly problem.
National Recovery Administration, Chs. 25-30.

 

Titles of books assigned.

A. R. Burns, The Decline of Competition.
Seager and Gulick, Trust and Corporation Problems.
W. Hamilton, Price and Price Policies.
Lyon and others, The National Recovery Administration.
S. Whitney, Trade Associations and Industrial Control.
J. M. Cassels, “The Marketing Machinery in the United States,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 1936.
Federal Trade Commission, Final Report on Chain Store Investigation, Senate Document No. 4, 74th Congress, 1st Session.
National Resources Committee, The Structure of the American Economy.
National Bureau of Economic Research, Price Research in the Steel and Petroleum Industries.

Reading period assignment to be announced.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in economics, 1895-2003 (HUC 8522.2.1). Box 2, Folder “1939-40 (2 of 2)”.

______________________

Reading Period Assignment

Economics 62b: Read one of the following:

  1. Lloyd Reynolds, The Control of Competition in Canada.
  2. National Bureau of Economic Research, Textile Markets.
  3. B. Gaskill, The Regulation of Competition.
  4. Pribram, Cartell Problems.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in economics, 1895-2003 (HUC 8522.2.1). Box 2, Folder “1939-40 (1 of 2)”.

______________________

Course Final Exam

1939—1940
HARVARD UNIVERSITY

ECONOMICS 62b2

I
About 45 minutes

  1. Write a critical appraisal of the book you read for the reading period assignment.

II
Answer both questions

  1. Do you think that the use of a basing-point system of price quoting in the iron and steel industry eliminates price competition? Discuss.
  2. How would you explain the fact that in the middle of the 1920’s competition in the automobile industry noticeably shifted from an emphasis on price to an emphasis on non-price factors?

III
Answer all questions

  1. The Robinson-Patman Act is “an anti-competition statute slipped into the anti-trust laws.” Discuss.
  2. Do you think that, as the Courts have interpreted the anti-trust acts, a different standard of legality has been applied to “integrated” than to “loose” combinations? Discuss.
  3. Assuming that the preservation of competition is a desirable objective, what do you consider to be the largest gaps in our anti-trust legislation?

Final. 1940.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Final examinations, 1853-2001 (HUC 7000.28) Box 5. Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Papers Printed for Final Examinations: History, History of Religions,…Economics,…,Military Science, Naval Science. June, 1940.

Image Source: Webpage “Oral History Interview with Edward S. MasonHarry S. Truman Library & Museum. Portrait of Edward S. Mason.

Categories
Chicago Exam Questions

Chicago. Money, Banking, and Monetary Policy Exam for A.M. and Ph.D. Friedman, Mints, Marschak, 1952

 

 

 

The committee for the Money, Banking and Monetary Policy examination for the A.M. and Ph.D. degrees for the Winter Quarter 1952 at the University of Chicago consisted of Milton Friedman (chairman), Lloyd Mints, and Jacob Marschak. The date of the examination was February 12, 1952 taken by 25 students. From Milton Friedman’s notes it appears that the committee agreed to pass ten examinees at the Ph.D. level, ten at the A.M. level and five were failed.

_________________________________

MONEY, BANKING, AND MONETARY POLICY
Written Examination for the A.M. and Ph.D. Degrees
Winter Quarter, 1952

 

Write on the first three and two other questions. Time: 4 hours.

DO NOT PLACE YOUR NAME ON YOUR PAPER. GIVE ONLY YOUR NUMBER.

 

  1. Suppose that (1) the national income is $270 billion; (2) the total wage bill is $180 billion; (3) the average annual wage is $3000, with only negligible variation among individual wages; (4) government’s demand for goods and services is $60 billion, and consumers’ demand is $200 billion. Suppose that, through joint action of employers and labor unions the wage rate is increased by 10%, and that the real volume of government demand is not changed. Indicate further conditions (such as, for example, the monetary policy, fiscal policy, technological conditions, initial level of employment, the behavior of consumers and of entrepreneurs) that you deem particularly important for a rough estimate of the effects of the rise in wages upon the levels of (present and future) consumption and of prices. Give two or three such estimates on the basis of your own hypothetical numerical specifications of those conditions.
  2. “It will be sound policy for the Treasury to borrow new funds insofar as possible from nonbank sources, to minimize the inflationary potential of the deficit.” (January 1952 Economic Report of the President, pp. 141-2.)
    Discuss the basis for and validity of this view. In your answer, distinguish between the effects of borrowing from the Federal Reserve Banks and from other banks; and justify your conclusions in detail.
  3. According to the Keynesian theory of income and employment, the change in money income equals the change in “investment,” or, more generally, the change in “autonomous expenditures” times the “multiplier.”
    (a) Explain the terms in quotation marks. How, if at all, does the value of the “multiplier” depend on the distribution of income, the stock of money, the rate of interest?
    (b) A shift from a balanced government budget to a deficit because of an increase in expenditures would generally be regarded as a corresponding increase in “autonomous expenditures,” and therefore, other things the same, as leading to an increase in money income equal to the multiplier times this amount. Can this statement, which suggests that any effect on money income of the deficit depends only on its size and the size of the multiplier, be reconciled with the quotation in question 2, which implies that “the inflationary potential of the deficit,” presumably meaning the rise in money income it produces, depends on the method of financing the deficit?
  4. It has been claimed that the British made the gold content of the pound sterling too high when they returned to gold in 1925. What would be the effects of such action? Did these effects actually appear to any significant degree? In any case, what means were available, if any, for determining the “correct” content of the pound?
  5. “The great difficulty, if not the impossibility, of reversing a downward movement [of business activity] by monetary means alone must be accepted as demonstrated by experience.” Is this statement warranted? Support your position.
  6. “Lowness of interest is generally ascribed to plenty of money. But money, however plentiful, has no other effect, if fixes, than to raise the price of labour…It is in vain…to look for the cause of the fall or rise of interest in the greater or less quantity of gold and silver, which is fixed in any nation” (David Hume, 1752).
    Discuss in light of “modern” theories of the rate of interest.

 

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Papers of Milton Friedman. Box 76, Folder 9 “University of Chicago Econ 300A”. [sic, this and other money, banking and monetary policy exams have been filed with material for the price theory course]

Categories
Exam Questions Suggested Reading Wisconsin

Wisconsin. Business Cycles. Readings and Exam. Friedman 1940-41

 

 

One of the courses taught by Milton Friedman in his year at the University of Wisconsin (1940-41) was on business cycles. A few charts and notes have survived from that course (in Milton Friedman’s papers at the Hoover Institution Archives) but also found in the same folder for that course are three pages of handwritten references that likely were readings for the course. These are listed below, most of which have been linked to the respective books/papers. The bibliographic data have been corrected and expanded where necessary. His incomplete notes, actually more of a log of the sessions, include a reference to “Mitchell & Burns, first chapter” for the third lecture “What is business cycle?”. I guess this must have been from an early draft of the 1946 NBER publication by Burns and Mitchell,  Measuring Business Cycles.

_______________________

Business Cycle Readings

Wesley Clair Mitchell. Business Cycles: The Problem and Its Setting. NBER, 1927. Chapter 2. Economic Organization and Business Cycles, pp. 61-188.

Friedrich A. Hayek. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle (translated by N. Kaldor and H. M. Croome). New York: 1933.
____________. Prices and Production. London: 1935.

R. G. Hawtrey. Currency and Credit. London: 1919, 1923, 1927.  First ed. 1919 Second ed. 1923.

____________. The Art of Central Banking. London: 1932
____________. Capital and Employment, 1937

Ludwig von Mises. The Theory of Money and Credit, 1934 (based on second German edition of 1924). Yale University Press 1953 ed.

Lionel Robbins. The Great Depression, 1934.

W. Ropke. Crises and Cycles (Vera C. Smith, trans. and rev.). 1936.
____________.  “Trends in German Business Cycle Policy”, Economic Journal, Sept. 1933.

Knut Wicksell.  Interest and Prices (R. F. Kahn, trans.). London: 1936.
____________. Lectures on Political Economy (E. Classen, trans.). London: 1935.  Volume I;  Volume II.
____________. “Influence of Rate of Interest on Prices”, Economic Journal, June 1907.

Alvin Hansen, Full Recovery or Stagnation. New York: 1938.

Chap. 1. Keynes, pp. 13-34;
Ch VI & VII pp. 137-60 Purchasing power: government deficit financing in various forms including consumer reserves[?];
Ch XVI through XX, 267-329. The economic outlook, Interpretation of 1937 recession, consequences of reducing expenditure, [illegible word beginning with “P”] pricing[?], Investment outlets & secular stagnation, The Fear[?] of Inflation

Walter Salant’s contribution to the discussion of Chapter 4 (“The Volume and Components of Saving in the United States 1933-1937”) in Conference on Research in National Income and Wealth. Studies in Income and Wealth, Volume 3. NBER, 1939. Vol. III. pp. 305-15.

Gottfried Haberler. Prosperity and Depression. League of Nations, 1937. Chapter 2 “The Purely Monetary Theory”, pp. 14-28.

  1. C. H. Douglas, Social Credit. Edinburgh: 1924. Part II, Ch I & II, 78-107 [sic, pp. 89-122]
  2. J. A. Hobson, The Economics of Unemployment. London: 1922. Ch. II “The Failure of Consumptions”, pp. 29-42
  3. William Trufant Foster and Waddill Catchings. Profits. Boston: 1925. pp. 398-418
  4. J. E. Meade, An Introduction to Economic Analysis and Policy. London: 2nd ed, 1937. Ch. 1 “Can the Economic System Work?”, pp. 1-11.
  5. E. F.M. Durbin, Purchasing Power and the Trade Depression. Toronto, 1934. Ch. I-III, pp. 17-102

National Resources Committee. Consumer Expenditures in the United States: Estimates for 1935-36. Washington, DC: USGPO, 1939. App. C[?]

Lester V. Chandler, Introduction to Monetary Theory. New York, 1940. Ch VI & VII, pp. 115-83

 

______________________

ECONOMICS 176
Final Examination
January 30, 1941

  1. One device proposed for mitigating the severity of cyclical fluctuations is the concentration of governmental expenditures on public works in depressions, the extra expenditures at such times to be financed from surpluses accumulated during prior periods of prosperity, from borrowing, from the creation of new money, or from current taxes. Under what conditions, if any, would you recommend the adoption of this proposal? If adopted, what method of financing would you endorse? Justify your answers in detail. Discuss both the merits and demerits of the proposal and of the various methods of financing. Discuss also the observed features of cyclical fluctuations that make the proposal appear strategically desirable or undesirable.
  2. “The business cycle in the general sense may be defined as the alternation of periods of prosperity and depression, of good and bad trade.” Discuss.
  3. Distinguish between “a theory of business cycles” and a “description of the cyclical process”. What characteristics would an adequate cycle theory possess?
  4. Does the fact that there has not yet been developed an adequate cycle theory known to be consistent with the observed course of cyclical fluctuations mean that there is no basis for judging the desirability of governmental measures designed to mitigate cyclical fluctuations? Does it mean that society is condemned either to inaction or to irrational intervention? Give the reasons for your answers.

 

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Papers of Milton Friedman. Box 75, Folder “University of Wisconsin, Econ. 176”.

Image Source:  Milton Friedman on the Columbia University 250th Anniversary Website.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard

Harvard. Final Examinations for Taussig’s Course “Economic Theory. Both terms, 1922-23

 

Frank W. Taussig taught a two term economic theory course offered for both graduates and undergraduates at Harvard for nearly the entire first third of the twentieth century. Some years he taught one term and a colleague would teach the other term, but usually it was his core course in the curriculum. Today’s posting is dedicated to the 1922-23 course examinations and constitutes a first for Economics in the Rear-view Mirror by having links to the pages or sections of economic works that correspond to the questions.  

_____________________

Course Description

1921-22

[Economics] 11. Economic Theory. Mon., Wed., Fri., at 2.30. Professors TAUSSIG and YOUNG.

Course 11 is intended to acquaint the student with the development of economic thought since the beginning of the nineteenth century, and at the same time to train him in the critical consideration of economic principles. The exercises are conducted mainly by the discussion of selected passages from the leading writers; and in this discussion the students are expected to take an active part. Attention will be given to the writings of Ricardo and J. S. Mill, and to representative modern economists.

Source: Division of History, Government, and Economics, 1921-22. Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. XVIII, No. 20 (April 21, 1921), p. 68.

1924-25

[Economics] 11. Economic Theory. Mon., Wed., Fri., at 2. Professor Taussig

Course 11 is intended to acquaint the student with the development of economic thought since the beginning of the nineteenth century, and at the same time to train him in the critical consideration of economic principles. The exercises are conducted mainly by the discussion of selected passages from the leading writers; and in this discussion the students are expected to take an active part. A careful examination is made of the writings of Ricardo and J. S. Mill, and of representative modern economists, such as Marshall, Böhm-Bawerk, Clark.

Source: Division of History, Government, and Economics 1924-25. Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. XXI, No. 22 (April 30, 1924), p. 71.

_____________________

Midyear Final Exam

1922-23
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 11

Arrange your answers in the order of the questions

1.  (a) “Given machinery, raw materials, and a year’s subsistence for 1000 laborers, does it make no difference with the annual product whether those laborers are Englishmen or East-Indians?”

[Frank W. Taussig, Wages and Capital: An Examination of the Wages Fund Doctrine (New York, 1896), p. 292,
where Taussig discusses a passage in Francis Amasa Walker’s, The Wages Question: A Treatise on Wages and the Wages Class, (New York, 1876), p. 145.]

(b) “In some exceptional industries it happens that the employer realizes on his product in a shorter time than this (a week), so that the laborer is not only paid out of the product of his industry, but actually advances to the employer a portion of the capital on which he operates.”

[Francis Amasa Walker, The Wages Question: A Treatise on Wages and the Wages Class, (New York, 1876), pp. 134-5.]

(c) “On American whaling ships the custom is not to pay fixed wages, but a “lay,” or a portion of the catch, which varies from a sixteenth to a twelfth to the captain down to a three-hundredth to the cabin-boy. Thus, when a whaleship comes into New Bedford or San Francisco after a successful cruise, she carries in her hold the wages of her crew, as well as the profits of her owners, and an equivalent which will reimburse them for all the stores used up during the voyage. Can anything be clearer than that these wages — this oil and bone which the crew of the whaler have taken — have not been drawn from capital, but are really a part of the produce of their labor”?

[Henry George, Progress and Poverty, 25th Anniversary edition, (Garden City,1926), pp. 52-53.]

Are these three situations essentially similar? And what is the bearing of each of them on the question under debate?

  1. “The extra gains which any producer or dealer obtains through superior talents for business, or superior business arrangements, are very much of a similar kind (analogous to rent). If all his competitors had the same advantages, and used them, the benefit would be transferred to their customers, through the diminished value of the article; he only retains it for himself because he is able to bring his commodity to market at a lower cost, while its value is determined by a higher. All advantages, in fact, which one competitor has over another, whether natural or acquired, whether personal or the result of social arrangements, bring the commodity, so far, into the Third Class, and assimilate the possessor of the advantage to a receiver or of rent.” Did Walker add anything of essential significance to this statement of Mill’s?
    Mill, Principles of Pol. Econ., pp. 476-77.

[John Stuart Mill. Principles of Political Economy. Vol. I, Fifth London Edition (New York, 1864) pp. 586-87.]

  1. (a) “It is not to be understood that the natural price of labour, estimated even in food and necessaries, is absolutely fixed and constant. It varies at different times in the same country, and very materially differs in different countries. It essentially depends on the habits and customs of the people.”

[David Ricardo, The Principles of Political Economy & Taxation. Everyman’s Library Edition (London, 1912), p. 54.]

(b) “A tax on raw produce, and on the necessaries of the labourer, would have another effect — it would raise wages. From the effect of the principle of population on the increase of mankind, wages of the lowest kind never continue much above that rate which nature and habit demand for the support of the labourers. This class is never able to bear any considerable proportion of taxation; and, consequently, if they had to pay 8s. per quarter in addition for wheat, and in some smaller proportion for other necessaries, they would not be able to subsist on the same wages as before, and to keep up the race of labourers. Wages would inevitably and necessarily rise.”

[David Ricardo, The Principles of Political Economy & Taxation. Everyman’s Library Edition (London, 1912), p. 100.]

(c) “If I have to hire a labourer for a week, and instead of ten shillings I pay him eight, no variation having taken place in the value of money, the labourer can probably obtain more food and necessaries with his eight shillings than he before obtained for ten.”

[David Ricardo, The Principles of Political Economy & Taxation. Everyman’s Library Edition (London, 1912), p. 11.]

Are these several statements of Ricardo’s consistent?

  1. In which of the following passages is the tendency to diminishing returns treated as referring to the amount of the produce, in which as referring to the value of the produce? Which method of treatment seems to you the proper one?

(a) “Whatever rise may take place in the price of corn, in consequence of the necessity of employing more labor and capital to obtain a given additional quantity of produce, such rise will always be equalled by the additional rent or additional labor employed. . . . Whether the produce belonging to the farmer be 180, 170, 160, or 150 quarters, he always obtains the same sum of £720 for it; the price increasing in an inverse proportion to the quantity.” — Ricardo.

[David Ricardo, The Principles of Political Economy & Taxation. Everyman’s Library Edition (London, 1912), p. 67.]

(b) The Channel Islands obtain agricultural produce to the value of £50 to each acre of the aggregate surface of the island. Fifty pounds’ worth of agricultural produce from each acre of the land is sufficiently good. But the more we study the modern achievements of agriculture the more we see that the limits of productivity of the soil are not attained. . . . I can confirm Mr. Bear’s estimate to the effect that under proper management even a cool greenhouse, which covers 4050 square feet, can give a gross return of £180.” — Kropotkin.

[Petr Alekssevich Kropotkin. Fields, factories, and workshops, (New York, 1907), pp. 91,118.]

(c) “Ricardo, and the economists of his time generally were too hasty in deducing this inference [tendency to increased pressure] from the law of diminishing return; and they did not allow enough for the increase of strength that comes from organization. But in fact every farmer is aided by the presence of neighbours, whether agriculturists or townspeople. . . . If the neighbouring market town expands into a large industrial centre, all his produce is worth more; some things which he used to throw away fetch a good price. He finds new openings in dairy farming and market gardening, and with a larger range of produce he makes use of rotations that keep his land always active without denuding it of any one of the elements that are necessary for its fertility.” — Marshall.

[Alfred Marshall. Principles of Economics, 8th ed., Book IV, Ch. III, §6 (London, 1920).]

  1. “Ricardo expresses himself as if the quantity of labour which it costs to produce a commodity and bring it to the market, were the only thing on which its value depended. But since the cost of production to the capitalist is not labour but wages, and since wages may be either greater or less, the quantity of labour being the same; it would seem that the value of the product cannot be determined solely by the quantity of labour, but by the quantity together with the remuneration; and that values must partly depend on wages.” — J. S. Mill.

[John Stuart Mill. Principles of Political Economy. Vol. I, Fifth London Edition (New York, 1864) p. 564.]

What would Ricardo say to this? and in what way, according to Mill, do wages affect value?

  1. Explain briefly external economies; internal economies.
    It has been said that internal economies cause an increase of demand, external economies result from an increase of demand. Do you agree?
    Suppose internal economies to become greater indefinitely, as output enlarges; what consequences would ensue? Suppose the same for external economies, what consequences?
  2. “There is one general law of demand: the greater the amount to be sold, the smaller must be the price at which it is offered in order that it may find purchasers. . . . The one universal rule to which the demand curve conforms is that it is inclined negatively throughout the whole of its length.”

[Alfred Marshall. Principles of Economics. 8th edition, Book III, Ch. III, §5, and footnote no. 2 (London, 1920), p. 99.]

“The demand curve over short periods — which may be a matter of weeks or months — is not necessarily inclined throughout in the same direction. It may be inclined positively. And similarly the supply curve does not necessarily have that constant positive inclination which is usually assumed. In the course of the higgling of the market this in its turn may have a negative inclination.”

[Frank W. Taussig, “Is the Market Price Determinate?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, p. 402.]

Whom do you believe to be the writers of these passages? Can they be harmonized? If so, how? If not, why not?

  1. The series of hypotheses made by Marshall concerning “meteoric showers of stones harder than diamonds”; the nature of the incomes derived by those finding them in the several cases; and the general principle which is thus illustrated.

[Alfred Marshall. Principles of Economics. Book V, Ch. IX, §2 (London, 1920), p. 415ff.]

Mid-Year. 1923.

_____________________

 

Academic Year-End Final Exam

 

1922-23
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 11

Arrange your answers in the order of the questions.

  1. “Labour of different kinds differently rewarded. This no cause of variation in the relative value of commodities.” On what grounds did Ricardo reach the conclusion summarized by him in these sentences? Is it consistent with the general trend of his theory of value?

[David Ricardo, The Principles of Political Economy & Taxation. Everyman’s Library Edition (London, 1912), p. 11.]

  1. “This doctrine [about non-competing groups] was given its name by J. E. Cairnes. . . . He supposed it to be a rare and remarkable exception to what he believed was the general rule, that the cost-of-production regulated the price of goods — essentially a “labor-theory of value.” We regard it merely as a helpful way of presenting a particular case of the general rule that the value of agents is derived from their products when the market is viewed as a whole.”

[Frank A. Fetter, Economic Principles (New York, 1915), p. 221.]

What would Cairnes say to this? What is your own view on the “general rule” stated in the concluding sentence?

[John E. Cairnes, Some Leading Principles of Political Economy, Newly Expounded, Chapter III, §7 “Nature of Reciprocal Demand as between nations and non-competing industrial groups”. (New York,1874), pp. 87ff.]

  1. “Suppose that society is divided into a number of horizontal grades, each of which is recruited from the children of its own members; and each of which has its own standard of comfort, and increases in numbers rapidly when the earnings to be got in it rise above, and shrinks rapidly when they fall below that standard. Suppose, then, that parents can bring up their children to any trade in their own grade, but cannot easily raise them above it and will not consent to sink them below it. . . .

[Quote is from Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics (Second Edition, London, 1891). Vol. I, Book VI, Chapter 1, §3, pp. 557-8.
Frank W. Taussig, International Trade, pp. 53ff.]

On these suppositions, would Cairnes say that value was determined by cost? What would Marshall say?

[John E. Cairnes, Some Leading Principles of Political Economy, Newly Expounded, Chapter III, §7 “Nature of Reciprocal Demand as between nations and non-competing industrial groups”. (New York,1874), pp. 87ff.]

  1. (a) “We have next to study the conditions of Business Management; and in so doing we must have in view a problem that will occupy our attention as we go on. It arises from the fact that, though in manufacturing at least nearly every individual business, so long as it is well managed, tends to become stronger the larger it has grown; and though prima facie we might therefore expect to see large firms driving their smaller rivals completely out of many branches of industry, yet they do not in fact do so.”

[Quote is from Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics (Second Edition, London, 1891). Vol. I, Book IV, Chapter XII, §1, p. 349.]

(b) “Since then business ability in command of capital moves with great ease horizontally from a trade which is overcrowded to one which offers good openings for it; and since it moves with great ease vertically, the abler men rising to the higher posts in their own trade, we see, even at this early state of our inquiry, some good reasons for believing that in modern England the supply of business ability in command of capital accommodates itself, as a general rule, to the demand for it; and thus has a fairly defined supply price.”

[Quote is from Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics (Eighth Edition, London, 1920). Book IV, Chapter XII, §12, p. 313.]

What is Marshall’s solution of the problem stated in the first of these passages? What sort of supply schedule do you suppose him to have in mind in the second? What would Walker say on both passages?

  1. “If the production of any, even the smallest, portion of the supply, requires as a necessary condition a certain price, that price will be obtained for all the rest. . . . The value, therefore, of an article (meaning its natural, which is the same with its average value) is determined by the cost of that portion of the supply which is produced and brought to market at the greatest expense. This is the Law of Value of the third of the three classes into which all commodities are divided. . . . Rent, therefore, forms no part of the cost of production which determines the value of agricultural produce.”

[John Stuart Mill. Principles of Political Economy. Vol. I, Book III, Chapter V §2, Fifth London Edition (New York, 1864) pp. 579-81.]

By whom do you suppose this passage to have been written? What would Marshall say to it?

  1. “‘Rent is not an element in price’ — such is the classical statement on the subject. . . . But, if one defines rent as product imputable to a concrete agent, the impossibility of maintaining such a claim becomes apparent. Even if one were to restrict the term rent to the product created by land, the claim that it is not an element in adjusting market values would be absurd; for it would amount to saying that a certain part of the output of every kind of goods has no effect on their market value. The ‘price’ referred to in the formula is, of course, the market value expressed in units of currency.” What do you say?

[John Bates Clark, The Distribution of Wealth Chapter XXIII, (1899, reprint New York, 1908), p. 358.]

  1. “When the artisan or professional man has once obtained the skill required for his work, a part of his earnings are for the future really a quasi-rent of the capital and labour invested in fitting him for his work, in obtaining his start in life, his business connections, and generally his opportunity for turning his faculties to good account; and only the remainder of his income is true earnings of effort. But this remainder is generally a large part of the whole. And here lies the contrast. For when a similar analysis is made of the profits of the business man, the proportions are found to be different: in his case the greater part is quasi-rent.” Why? or why not?

[Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics (Eight Edition, London, 1920). Book VI, Chapter VIII, §8, p. 622.]

  1. (a) “Capital-goods imply waiting for the fruits of labor. Capital, on the contrary, implies the direct opposite of this: it is the means of avoiding all waiting. It is the remover of time intervals, — the absolute synchronizer of labor and its fruits. It is the means of putting civilized man in a position which, so far as time is concerned, is akin to that in which the rude forester stood, when when he broke off limbs of dead trees and laid them on his fire. The very appliances which, in their extent and complexity, seem in one view to mean endless waiting, in another view mean no waiting at all but the instantaneous appearance of the final fruits of every bit of labor that is put forth.”

[John Bates Clark, The Distribution of Wealth, Chapter XX, (1899, reprint New York, 1908), p. 311.]

(b) “Tools are productive, but time is the condition of getting tools — this is the simple and literal fact. The roundabout or time-consuming mode of using labor insures efficient capital-goods. . . . When the hatchet has worn itself completely out, and the fruits of using it are before the man in the large dwelling, he may look backward to the beginning of the process, when he faced nature empty-handed, and say: ‘Labor has done it all. Work and waiting have given me my goods.’ The working and the waiting have, indeed, insured the hatchet, as an incidental result of this way of working. Production that plans to put its fruits into the future will create capital-goods as an immediate effect, but labor and time are enough to make the ultimate effect certain. Let the man work intelligently through an interval of time, and the production of consumers’ wealth is sure.”

[John Bates Clark, The Distribution of Wealth, Chapter XX, (1899, reprint New York, 1908), p. 309.]

(c) “The effort of postponement, or the preference of uncertain future for certain present consumables, necessary for supplying capital, if it is an effort, is a continuous one lasting all the time the capital is in use. The critic who asks, why a single ‘act of abstinence’ which is past and done with should be rewarded by a perpetual payment of annual interest, fails to realise that, so far as saving involves a serviceable action of the saver, it goes on all the time that the saver lies out of the full present enjoyment of his property, i. e. as long as his savings continue to function as productive instruments.”

[J. A. Hobson, Work and Wealth: A Human Valuation (New York, 1914), p. 92.]

What would Clark say to the three propositions here stated? What are your own views?
By whom do you suppose the passages to have been written?

Final. 1923.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Examination Papers in Economics, 1882-1935. Prof. F. W. Taussig. (HUC 7882).

Image Source:  Frank W. Taussig in Harvard Class Album 1925.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard

Harvard. Final Exams 2nd semester of graduate money and banking course, John Henry Williams. 1939-41

 

 

John Henry Williams was professor of economics at Harvard (1921-57) and served from 1936-48 as the first dean of its Graduate School of Public Administration. Together with Alvin H. Hansen he taught a graduate course with the nominal title “Principles of Money and Banking” that from judging from detailed notes taken in 1938-39 by R. W. Bean (Harvard Class of 1939) and in 1939-40 by James Tobin (likewise Harvard Class of 1939), also included generous doses of Keynesian macroeconomics and fiscal policy as well as of international monetary economics. From these notes we learn that Hansen and Williams taught the first and second semesters, respectively. To date I have only been able to find the semester final examination questions for the second semesters. A future posting will provide the reading list for the course.

This posting gives the course announcements, enrollments and the final examination questions for the 1938-39 through 1940-41 years.

Research Tip:  a typed copy of the Bean notes [missing pp. 98-99] can be found in the Wolfgang Stolper papers at Rubenstein Archive at Duke University (Box 29 ). A neatly handwritten bound copy of Tobin’s notes can be found in Box 6 of his papers at the Yale Archives.

________________________________

 

1938-39 Academic Year

Course Announcement

Economics 141. Principles of Money and Banking. Tu., Th., Sat., at 11. Professors WILLIAMS and HANSEN, and Associate Professor HARRIS.

Source: Harvard University. Courses of Instruction Offered by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences during 1938-39, 2nd edition. Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. XXXV, No. 42 (September 23, 1938), p. 151.

 

Course Enrollment

[Economics] 141. Professors WILLIAMS and HANSEN, and Associate Professor HARRIS—Principles of Money and Banking.

Total 40: 18 Graduates, 10 Seniors, 6 School of Public Administration, 5 Radcliffe, 1 Others

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments for 1938-39, p. 99.

 

Second Semester Final Exam, 1938-39

1938-39
HARVARD UNIVERSITY

ECONOMICS 141
PRINCIPLES OF MONEY AND BANKING

(Three hours)

Answer THREE questions

  1. Discuss the elements of instability in our monetary and banking mechanism, and the suggestions in recent years for making it more stable.
  2. Discuss the “pump-priming” theory versus the “compensatory” theory of deficit spending.
  3. Discuss the relation of fiscal policy to long-run economic progress.
  4. Discuss the merits and defects of monetary policy as an instrument of business cycle control.

Final. 1939

Source: Harvard University Examinations. Final examinations, 1853-2001, Box 4 (HUC 7000.28). Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Papers Printed for Final Examinations in History, History of Religions, … , Economics, …, Military Science, Naval Science (June, 1939).

 

________________________________

 

1939-40 Academic Year

Course Announcement

Economics 141. Principles of Money and Banking. Tu., Th., Sat., at 11. Professors WILLIAMS and HANSEN.

Source: Harvard University. Courses of Instruction Offered by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences During 1939-40, 2nd edition. Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. XXXVI, No. 42 (September 22, 1939), p. 158.

 

 

Course Enrollment 

[Economics] 141. Professors WILLIAMS and HANSEN.—Principles of Money and Banking.

Total 65: 38 Graduates, 13 Seniors, 2 School of Public Administration, 6 Radcliffe, 6 Others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments for 1939-40, p. 100.

 

 

Second Semester Final Exam, 1939-40

1939-40
HARVARD UNIVERSITY

ECONOMICS 141
PRINCIPLES OF MONEY AND BANKING

(Three hours)

Discuss question ONE and TWO others.

  1. Keynes’ “General Theory” as a basis for long-run economic stability.
  2. The views of Foster and Catchings and Hayek on the “dilemma of thrift.”
  3. Hawtrey’s analysis of the business cycle and its control.
  4. The American gold problem.

 

Final. 1940

Source: Harvard University Examinations. Final examinations, 1853-2001, Box 5 (HUC 7000.28). Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Papers Printed for Final Examinations in History, History of Religions, … , Economics, …, Military Science, Naval Science (June, 1940).

 

________________________________

 

1940-41 Academic Year

Course Announcement

Economics 141. Principles of Money and Banking. Tu., Th., Sat., at 11. Professors WILLIAMS and HANSEN.

The subject as a whole will be systematically reviewed. Selections from important writings dealing with monetary principles will be read and critically discussed. Particular attention will be given to the theory of the value of money and to the policy and operations of central banks.

Source: Harvard University. Division of History, Government, and Economics, Containing an Announcement for 1940-41. Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. XXXVII, No. 51 (August 15, 1940), p. 61.

 

Course Enrollment 

[Economics] 141. Professors WILLIAMS and HANSEN.—Principles of Money and Banking.

Total 45: 28 Graduates, 4 Seniors, 7 School of Public Administration, 2 Radcliffe, 4 Others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College and Reports of Departments for 1940-41, p. 60.

 

Second Semester Final Exam, 1940-41

 

HARVARD UNIVERSITY

ECONOMICS 141
PRINCIPLES OF MONEY AND BANKING

(Three hours)

Discuss THREE topics.

  1. The uses and limitations of the multiplier concept.
  2. Compare the “over-saving” and “under-investment” theories as guides to fiscal policy.
  3. Monetary and fiscal policies under conditions of war or defense.
  4. “Full employment” as a criterion of fiscal policy.
  5. Discuss: “Deficit spending is the logical sequel to central bank policy, and it was entirely logical that its first phase should be pump-priming.”

Final. 1941

Source: Harvard University Examinations. Final examinations, 1853-2001, Box 5 (HUC 7000.28). Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Papers Printed for Final Examinations in History, History of Religions, … , Economics, …, Military Science, Naval Science (June, 1941).

 

Image Source:  John Henry Williams from the Harvard Class Album 1950.

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
Chicago Exam Questions

Chicago. Final Examinations for International Economics. Metzler, 1947-48

 

The University of Chicago’s intermediate economics course “International Economic Relations”, Economics 270, dropped its international trade component to go full international macro (i.e. exchange rates and balance of payments) with Lloyd A. Metzler’s appointment. The course description for 1947-48 did not reflect the change in emphasis (the updated description is found below in the course description for 1948-49)  but it is clear from the examination questions for both the summer quarters of 1947 and 1948 transcribed for this posting that the  syllabus for the Autumn quarter of 1949 must have been essentially the same for those earlier courses.

_______________________________

[Course Description, 1948-1949]

[Economics] 270. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS. The nature of international payments and receipts; foreign trade and the banking system. The gold standard in the interwar period. The breakdown of the gold standard and the period of fluctuating exchange rates. Exchange controls, clearing agreements and payments agreements. The second world war and the foreign exchange markets. The position of the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development in the present world economy. Prereq: Econ 209, 230 [Intermediate Economic Theory, Introduction to Money and Banking, respectively], or equiv. Sum: TuThS 11; Win: MWF 9:30; Metzler.

 

Source: University of Chicago. Announcements, Volume XLVIII, Number 4: The College and the Divisions, Sessions of 1948-1949, May 25, 1948, p. 249.

_____________________

 

Econ. 270
Exam Summer 1947

Answer one question from each part

I

  1. Discuss the role played by either long-term or short-term capital movements in the U. S. balance of payments during the inter-war period.
  2. Discuss the origin of the Sterling area, indication [sic] what distinguished this area from other currency systems, and how the system operated before the war.
  3. Distinguish between intended and unintended neutralization of gold movements, and indicate what bearing neutralization had on the operation of the gold standard in the inter-war years.

II

  1. Show how the German exchange clearing system led to bilateral trade, and discuss the disadvantages of bilateralism.
  2. Present a program of your own for international currency reform, and show how your program would solve some of the problems of the interwar period.
  3. Evaluate a system of flexible exchange rates as a means of adjusting balance of payments.

 

Economics 270
Summer 1948

Answer two questions, including I

  1. About two weeks ago, the New Zealand government announced an appreciation of its currency, from £N.Z. 1.25 = £1.00 sterling to £N.Y. 1.00 = £1.00 sterling. Bearing in mind the following information, discuss the probable reasons for and probable consequences of this move.

1937

1946 Dec. 1947

May 1948

Gold Holdings (millions of dollars)

23

23 23

23

Foreign exchange Holdings (millions of dollars)

127

365 300

348

Currency and Deposits (millions of N.Z. pounds)

47

168 175

187

Cost of Living Index

100

123 133

135

Wholesale Prices:

Home goods

100

132 156

156

Import-type goods

100

171 191

194

Index of Export Prices

100

141 193

199

Total value of trade (millions of N.Z. [pounds]

Exports

65

98 128*

Imports

56

72 128*

*all of 1947

  1. “The balance of payments on current accounts determines the amount of the net change in a country’s claims against other countries. The capital accounts simply show the form in which these claims are held.” Discuss carefully, using any numerical examples you deem appropriate.
  2. Write a brief essay on the relation of currency values to the prospects for European recovery.

 

 

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library. Lloyd Appleton Metzler Papers, Box 9, Folder “Course Exams 270-271”.

Source Image: “From family album, taken while Lloyd Metzler was a student at Harvard.”
“Lloyd A. Metzler” by Margiemetz – Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Commons.