Categories
Economists Gender LGBTQ

Chicago. Economics PhD alumna, Leona Margaret Powell, 1924

 

This post adds further biographical/career information for the sixth woman to be awarded a Ph.D. in economics at the University of Chicago, Leona Margaret Powell, to that provided in an earlier page listing early Chicago economics PhDs (1894-1926). The arc of Powell’s career took her from librarian, to expert on the United Typothetae of America to managing editor of the Handbook of Business Administration, and back to the manager of the Bureau of Research and Information at the American Management Association.

Powell’s partial bibliography is found in the Bibliography of Female Economic Thought (Madden, Seiz, and Pujol, eds.), p. 381.

For over twenty years Leona M. Powell lived together with the English woman Phyllis Moulton, interpolating the 1920-40 U.S. census reports. It is not unlikely that the two met when Powell was working in London in 1918. By the 1940 census Moulton’s relation to the Powell’s “head of the household” was listed as “partner”. I believe Moulton died in 1942. 

_____________________

1884, July 19. Born in Grand Rapids, Ohio.

Parents: Octavia Allison née Crooks (1844-1933), Israel Powell (1845-1887).

1905. A.B. Ohio Wesleyan University. Awarded High honors upon graduation.

Phi Beta Kappa (Source: DePauw University yearbook Mirage (1911), p. 182)

1906-07[?]. Simmons College, School of Library Science, Boston, MA. (Source: DePauw University yearbook Mirage (1911), p. 182)

1909. Promoted from assistant librarian to head librarian of DePauw University, Greencastle, IN. Succeeding previous librarian who married the professor of rhetoric and English literature at the university and resigned Dec. 15, 1908. (Source: DePauw Alumnus 1938, p. 3.)

In the 1911 DePauw University yearbook Mirage Powell is identified as the university librarian (“past two years and a half”). Note: I have not seen the 1912 edition of Mirage, but in 1913 edition, Powell is no longer identified as the university librarian. Margaret Gilmore (Powell’s previous assistant: “acting librarian”)

1915. Assistant in Political Economy, University of Chicago.

1916-17. Assistant in Political Economy, University of Chicago.

1917. Author of Lesson B12 “Impersonality of modern life” in the U.S. Education Bureau’s Community Leaflets. Lessons in community and national life, edited by Charles H. Judd and Leon C. Marshall. Series B, pp.97-104.

1918-19. Clerk at the U.S. Shipping Board, Lancaster House, London SW1.

“Powell, Leona M., in case of emergency notify mother, Mrs. Octavia A. Powell, 6049 Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois.” Departure Date 14 Sept 1918 from New York.  Civilian casual: “…on official Business U.S. Shipping Board”. (Source: U.S. Army Transport Service Arriving and Departing Passenger Lists, 1910-1939.)

Arrival in Liverpool aboard the SS Lapland of the White Star Steamship line on 29 Sept 1918 from New York. Passenger: “Powell, Leona M. Amer Shppg. Lancaster House, London SW1 clerk”. (Source: ancestry.com)

Return to New York City on 6 July 1919 aboard the S.S. Noordam from Falmouth UK (June 23, 1919 depart). Note: In addition to Leona M. Powell (age 35 of Chicago), another passenger on the ship was Hazel Kyrk (age 32, Ashley, Ohio). (Source: ancestry.com)

1920. U.S. Census:

Roomers at 6049 Ellis Ave: Leona Powell (editorial work, government) and her mother, Octavia. Also listed as roomer was Phylis Moulton (secretary, Art Store) age 30 (year of immigration 1919).

Note. Arrived 21 Dec. 1919 in New York on the S.S. Saxonia from London, Phyllis M. Moulton 30 years age, single. “Stenog. Nearest relative: 31 Meranda Rd, London, N. 19. Mother: Mrs Moulton. Final destination Chicago, Ill.” (Source: ancestry.com)

1923. Bureau of Industrial Relations of the United Typothetae of America.

1924. Ph.D., University of Chicago.

Thesis title: A history of the United Typothetae of America, with especial reference to labor policy.

1926. Leona Margaret Powell. History of the United Typothetae of America. University of Chicago: Chicago,

An account of the origin, development, and policies of the United Typothetae of America, which is the association of master printers of the United States and Canada. Contains chapters on national agreements with the unions, and the eight-hour day.

1928, September. Preface to Emily Clark Brown’s Joint Industrial Control in the Book and Job Printing Industry. BLS Bulletin No. 481 (December 1928)

“and my friends under whose direction I had my introduction to labor problems in the printing industry in the department of industrial relations of the United Typothetae of America….Leona M. Powell of the research bureau of the New York Employing Printers’ Association.

1930. U.S. Census:

Address: Hudson Terrace 4, Dobbs Ferry Village in Westchester County, Town of Greenberg.
Head of household: 45 years old single woman, Leona Powell, born in Ohio. Occupation: Research, Industry: Trade Association
Boarder: 40 year old single woman, Phyllis Moulton, born in England, social worker in a clinic.

1931. Handbook of Business Administration, W. J. Donald (Ed.-in-chief) and Leona Powell (Managing ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1931.

1938. Manager, Bureau of Research and Information, American Management Association, New York, N.Y.

1940. U.S. Census:

Address: East 68th Street, New York
Head of household: Leona Powell, Librarian.
Partner: Phyllis Moulton: age 52, Social worker.

1940.  Arrival on the S.S. Evangeline, from Yarmouth, N.S. at Boston, MA July 6: Phyllis Moulton and Leona M. Powell. (Source: ancestry.com).

1942. Phyllis Moulton [not entirely certain this is the same Phyllis Moulton, though the birth year is indeed consistent], died Kings (Brooklyn), New York 6 June (birth year about 1889). (Source: ancestry.com)

1971, September 27. Leona Margaret Powell died in Delaware, Ohio.

Image Source: DePauw University yearbook Mirage (1911), p. 182.

Categories
Economists Gender Harvard NBER Radcliffe Smith Vassar

Radcliffe.Economics Ph.D. Alumna, Dorothy Carolin Bacon, 1928

 

This post began after I noticed that it has been some time since I posted biographical and career information for a economics Ph.D. alumna. I figured it would be good to search for a candidate that Economics in the Rear-view Mirror has already caught in an earlier archival trawling expedition but for whom the details of post-doc life had not been added. Dorothy Carolin Bacon was awarded her Radcliffe economics Ph.D. in 1928 and the following item was what I had to start with.

Dorothy Carolin Bacon.

General Examination in Economics, Thursday, May 26, 1927.
Committee: Professors Persons (chairman), Carver, Crum, Gay and Holcombe.
Academic History: Simmons College, 1918-19; Radcliffe College, 1919-22, 1923-24, 1926-. A.B., Radcliffe, 1922; A.M., ibid., 1924. Assistant in Economics, Vassar College, 1924-25. Instructor in Economics, ibid., 1925-26.
General Subjects: 1. Economic Theory. 2. Sociology. 3. History of Political Theory. 4. Statistics. 5. Economic History. 6., Money, Banking and Crises.
Special Subject: Money, Banking and Crises.
Thesis Subject: A Study of the Dispersion of Wholesale Commodity Prices, 1890-1896.  (With Professor Persons.)

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examinations for the Ph.D. (HUC 7000.70), Folder “Examinations for the Ph.D., 1926-1927”.

________________________

One of the items that came up after searching for a Google search was an advertisement for her handwritten Radcliffe student journal notes from her Physics course in 1922. Besides being surprised to see a list price of $750.00 for this notebook, I was intrigued by the relatively detailed information provided about Dorothy Bacon. While everything about the text struck me as fully plausible, I thought it worth some due diligence to confirm what I could from the bookseller’s bio-blurb. I have added links wherever possible to sources that confirm the details below. It would appear that information from the above item in Economics in the Rear-view Mirror as well as from the Dzuback chapters in Madden and Dimand (eds.)  and Margaret A. Nash (ed.) have provided some (or even much) of what was included in the D. Anthem advertisement that follows.

The section on Smith College in Mary Ann Dzuback’s chapter “Women economists in the academy: struggles and strategies, 1900-1940” in the Routledge Handbook of the History of Women’s Economic Thought, Kirsten Madden and Robert W. Dimand (eds.) provides information on Dorothy Bacon from the faculty files of the Smith College Archives [Office of President William Allan Neilson Files, Box 364, Folder 34]:

Bacon came to Smith a year before finishing her Ph.D. at Radcliffe in 1928. She took research and service sabbatical leaves to work for the Works Progress Administration and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in the 1930s. She focused her research on money flows during the 1930s, cost price problems, and the development of federal level credit institutions. By the 1940s, she was working with the federal Office of Price Administration. By the 1950s, she was consulting with the Brookings Institution, had been a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, and received grants from the SSRC. She published a monograph on the recent economic history of five towns around Northampton, Massachusetts, in the late 1930s, and was completing a book on the development of Philippine credit institutions by 1970.

________________________

Another paragraph by Mary Ann Dzuback

From: Mary Ann Dzuback. Chapter 7. Research at Women’s Colleges, 1890-1940. Women’s Higher Education in the United States (Historical Studies in Education), edited by Margaret A. Nash. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Dorothy Bacon (1927–54) arrived in 1928, eventually taking an endowed chair. She investigated the flows of currency during the Depression, cost price problems, and the growth of credit institutions, and was in great demand by private research agencies and the federal government. A sometime consultant with the National Bureau of Economic Research, in the 1920s and 1930s she worked with a range of government and research agencies. She was awarded grants by the Social Science Research Council and published regularly. Bacon’s record of research and service, and her sabbaticals, suggest that women social science scholars at Smith were encouraged to use their research to inform policy at the federal and international levels.

________________________

From: Advertisement for “Economist Dorothy Bacon’s 1922 Physics 2 Journal from Radcliffe College (1922)

Dorothy Carolin Bacon was born in 1902 to George Preston Bacon, a professor of Physics and Dean of both the Tufts Engineering School and the Bromfield-Pearson School, and Hannah Churchill Bacon, a trained nurse. Her sister, Ruth Bacon, also attended Radcliffe College and later became the first female officer of a State Department geographical bureau (Bureau of Eastern Affairs). Bacon attended Simmons College from 1918-19 before transferring to Radcliffe, the former women’s liberal arts college that fully merged with Harvard in 1999. She earned her B.A. (1922), M.A. (1924) and Ph.D (1927) [sic, 1928] there with her dissertation concerning A Study of the Dispersion of Wholesale Commodity Prices, 1890-1896. While at Radcliffe she also worked for the Federal Reserve Board’s Division of Research and Analysis [as a Statistical Clerk starting 1 July 1922earning an annual salary of $1600 before resigning [May 10] in 1923.

She was hired as an assistant professor [sic, “Assistant” is a lower rank than “Assistant Professor”] in economics at Vassar in 1924 [cf. AER, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Dec. 1924), p. 829 “Miss Dorothy C. Bacon is assistant in economics at Vassar College.”], but was recruited by Esther Lowenthal, Dean of the Faculty and chair of the economics department at Smith, to join Smith’s faculty in 1927. At Smith she focused her research on money flows during the 1930s, cost price problems, and the development of credit institutions at the federal level. In 1930, she was one of three research associates selected for the National Bureau of Economic Research where she studied the relation of current stock prices to earnings per share from the twenty corporations comprising the Index of Industrial Stock Prices of the Harvard Economic Service. Her monograph, Recent Economic History of the Five Towns (1937) was published by the Works Progress Administration. In 1942, Bacon left her post at Smith [sic, only temporary leave] to work under Leon Henderson at the Office of Price Administration. It was there that she wrote a study of the scrap metal market in Syracuse, NY. By the 1950s, she was consulting with the Brookings Institution and was publishing her research in the Review of Economic Statistics, the Journal of the American Statistical Association and the National Encyclopedia. She appears to have never married [she wasn’t]  and when she died in 1998 she was buried at Shawsheen Cemetery in Bedford, MA, alongside her parents and sister.

Source: D. Anthem, Bookseller advertisement for “Economist Dorothy Bacon’s 1922 Physics 2 Journal from Radcliffe College (1922) [posted price: $750.00!]

________________________

A.E.A. Biographical Listing, 1969

BACON, Dorothy Carolin, academic; b. Beloit, Wis., 1902; student Simmons Coll., 1918-19; A.B., Radcliffe Coll., 1922, A.M., 1924, Ph.D., 1928. FIELDS 2c, 5e, 4a. Research asso., Nat. Bur. Econ. Research, 1930-31; formerly sr. research asso., Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.; fed. Dir. Research project, Work Progress Adm., 1935-36; asst. div. economist, food price div., OPA [Office of Price Administration], 1943-47, OPS [Office of Price Stabilization], 1951; Fulbright prof., U. Philippines, 1956-57; mem. Faculty, Smith Coll. Since 1927, prof. since 1938, Robert A. Woods prof. since 1956. ADDRESS Smith Coll., 115 Elm St., Northampton, MA 01060.

Note. Fields: 2c (Economic Development Studies); 5e (General International Economics); 4a (Monetary and Financial Theory and Institutions).

SourceThe American Economic Review, Vol. 59, No. 6, 1969. Handbook of the American Economic Association (January 1970), p. 17.

________________________

Bachelor of Arts, Radcliffe (1922)

With Distinction in Special Subjects
Cum Laude

Dorothy Carolin Bacon [of] Medford. In Mathematics.

Source: Report of the Dean in Annual Report of Radcliffe College for 1920-1923, p. 43.

________________________

Master of Arts, Radcliffe (1924)

Dorothy Carolin Bacon, A.B.

Source: Report of the Dean in Annual Report of Radcliffe College for 1923-1924, p. 31.

________________________

Doctor of Philosophy, Radcliffe (1928)

Dorothy Carolin Bacon A.M.

Subject, Economics. Special Field, Money and Banking. Dissertation, “Maladjustment of Prices with Special Reference to the Wholesale Prices of Commodities in the United States; 1890-1896”

Source:  Report of the Dean in Annual Reports of Radcliffe College for 1927-1928, p. 23.

________________________

Publications of Dorothy C. Bacon

A Monthly Index of Commodity Prices, 1890-1900. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 8, No. 4 (October 1926), pp. 177-83.

The Significance of Fixed-base and Link Relatives in Studies of Price Stability: A Comment on the Behavior of Prices. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 23 (September 1928), pp. 274-81.

Maladjustment of Prices with Special Reference to the Wholesale Prices of Commodities in the United States, 1890-1896. Ph.D. thesis, Radcliffe College.

Encyclopedia articles in the National Encyclopedia.

Recent Economic History of Five Towns. Northampton, Mass.: Smith College, 1937.

________________________

Vital Dates and Miscellaneous Information

Born:  25 February 1902 in Beloit, Wisconsin.

Last Residence: Niceville, Okaloosa, Florida [Socal Security death index].

Died: 8 November in Meriden, New Haven County, Connecticut. [Apparently visiting: the Connecticut Death Index notes her address 2475 Virginia, Residence Andover, District of Columbia].

________________________

Image Source: Senior year picture of Dorothy Carolin Bacon in the  Radcliffe Year Book 1922, p. 23.

 

 

 

Categories
American University Columbia Economists Gender

American University. Economics Ph.D. Alumna, Edith Louise Allen, 1928

 

Over the past several years your curator of Economics in the Rear-view Mirror has tried to have about one-tenth of the posts dedicated to artifacts/information about the training and subsequent careers of women economists. This particular post began with me stumbling upon Lois E. Torrence’s  A Survey and Analysis of Earned Doctorates, 1916-1966, at the American University, Washington, D.C. I did not notice at first that the monograph was limited to Ph.D. graduates of the American University and I randomly selected the 1928 economics Ph.D., Edith Louise Allen,  for this post. All that I had to go on from the Torrence survey was that Allen received her undergraduate degree from the University of Illinois, her masters degree from Columbia and that she was deceased as of the time of the survey (1966).

From Allen’s record that I have been able to piece together, we see how the field and departments of home economics served at least in part as sort of a women’s auxiliary for teaching and research of household and family economics.

Edith Louise Allen was born June 24, 1880 in Dillon township, Illinois and died August 18, 1949 in Delevan, Illinois.

Warning. There turns out to have been another woman with the name Edith Louise Allen who attended Barnard College around 1910 (but apparently who did not graduate, but instead[?] married Mr. Edwin C. Johnston). Her name comes up in internet searches, but she really is a different person. “Our” Edith received her master’s from Columbia about seven years after Barnard Edith was serving as the editor of the Barnard yearbook. 

_______________________

University Education and Graduate Training

A.B. in Science. University of Illinois (1903)

Source:  James Herbert Kelley, ed. The Alumni Record of the University of Illinois (1913), p. 290.

M.A., Faculty of Education and Practical Arts. Columbia University (1917).

Source:  Columbia University. One Hundred and Sixty-third Annual Commencement June 6, 1917, p. 38.

Ph.D., American University (1928).

Source: Lois E. Torrence.  A Survey and Analysis of Earned Doctorates, 1916-1966, at the American University, Washington, D.C. p. 52.

Ph.D. Dissertation: Edith Louise Allen. American housing: as affected by social and economic conditions. Peoria, Ill.: Manual Arts Press, 1930.

This book is the result of a study of the effects of social and economic changes on American housing made by the author in fulfilling the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy from American university.–Preface.

Summary of the dissertation. 

A study of the historical development of houses in the United States, showing the effect of inventions, scientific discoveries, educational progress, financial conditions, political situations, immigration, and other factors in modifying the idea of what constitutes suitable housing. The purpose is to help in determining the features most desirable for certain conditions or types of family life, “so that, from the facts set forth, students of home economics and others will have a basis for further research, and for deciding what certain individuals need or can afford or attain in housing.”

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 31, no. 5 (November, 1930) p. 249.

_______________________

Publications identified
at time of this post

Edith Louise Allen. Mechanical Devices in the Home. Peoria, Illinois: The Manual Arts Press, 1922.

Note: author’s previous affiliations from the title page:
Home Economics in Kansas State Agricultural College, University of Texas, and Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College.

Edith Louise Allen. Rugmaking Craft. Peoria, Ill.: Manual Arts Press, 1946.

Edith Louise Allen. Weaving You Can Do. Peoria, Ill.: Manual Arts Press, 1947.

Congressional Information Service, CIS Index to U.S. Executive Branch Documents, 1910-1932: Guide to …, Part 5, (p. 126).

Allen, Edith Louise. How colored home demonstration agents attacked problems of health and sanitation in 1930; summary including abstracts from Negro agents’ reports [on home economics extension activities in Southern States] (1930) A43.5-2.3

Allen, Edith Louise. Illustrative material used in teaching of home economics, suggestions for teachers in elementary and secondary schools [on collection, storage, and use] A43.2-1.

Extension Service, Agriculture Department, Miscellaneous extension publication 49, by Edith Allen. Federal publications of interest to home-economics extension workers, partial list of references. February 1940, 7 pages.

_______________________

Obituary
Miss Edith L. Allen [1880-1949]

Delvan. — (PNS) Funeral services for Miss Edith Louise Allen 69, who died Thursday evening at her home in Delavan, were set for 2 p.m. (CDT) Saturday at the Hothton mortuary, with Dr. E. C. Pires, pastor of the Presbyterian church, officiating. Burial is to be in Prairie Rest cemetery.

Miss Allen was born June 24, 1880, in Dillon township, the daughter of Ralph and Ada Eaton Allen. She was a graduate of the Delavan school, and she taught home economics at several state colleges and universities. She also wrote three books on home economics and textiles. She was a member of the Peoria chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution.

Miss Allen worked for the agriculture extension department in Washington, D.C. She returned to her home in Delavan seven years ago. She was active in the national Association of University Women, 10 women’s clubs, the Association for the Advancement of Science, the National Home Economics association, and the National Dietetic association.

Miss Allen had a doctor of philosophy degree from the American university in Washington, D.C. After her return to Delavan, she served as president of the Delavan Women’s club, was a member of the Order of the Eastern Star, and worked for the Presbyterian church.

She is survived by three brothers and two sisters: Paschal of Green Valley and Ralph and Theodore of Delavan; Mrs. Robert Hopkins and Mrs. J.R. Johns, both of Delavan.

Source: The Pantagraph (Bloomington, Indiana). August 20, 1949, p. 5.

 

Associated Press Obituary
Dr. Edith Allen Dies: Was Federal Scientist

Delavan, Ill., Aug. 19 (AP) Dr. Edith Allen, 69, retired research worker of the extension service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, died at her home today.

She retired from government service seven years ago after more than 20 years of employment in Washington. Previously she had taught at state universities is Iowa, Oklahoma, Texas and Kansas.

Source: Herald and Review, Decatur, Illinois. August 20, 1949, p. 9.

_______________________

Fun Fact:

Edith Louise Allen was a
Daughter of the American Revolution

MISS EDITH LOUISE ALLEN.
Born in Delaware, Ill.
Descendant of Ensign Timothy Clark

Daughter of Ralph Allen and Ada Mary Eaton, his wife.
Granddaughter of Lucius Eaton and Lucy Clevland, his wife.
Gr-granddaughter of David Eaton and Anna Amy Clark, his wife.
Gr-gr-grandaughter of Timothy Clark and Amy Woodworth, his wife.

Timothy Clark (1745-1813) in 1775 served as a private in a companyfrom Rockingham, Vt., which marched to Ticonderoga; 1777 was in Col. William Williams’ company of militia and, 1780, was promoted ensign. He was born in Mansfield, Conn.: died in Hancock, Vt.

Source: Jenn Winslow Coltrane, National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution, Lineage Book Vol. LXI (1907).

 

Categories
Gender M.I.T. Modigliani Race Suggested Reading Syllabus Undergraduate

M.I.T. Undergraduate Finance Reading List. Kuh, 1962

 

Edwin Kuh (1925-86) was hired by the Sloan School at M.I.T. in 1954, completing his Harvard Ph.D. in 1955. He was promoted to full professor of economics and finance in 1962 and was a joint appointment of the Sloan School and the department of economics. Mostly known as a pioneer in the application of econometric methods to forecasting, his New York Times obituary notes that in 1971 he worked together with Lester Thurow and John Kenneth Galbraith to devise proposals to promote affirmative action.

The undergraduate course reading list for finance transcribed for this post was fished out of Franco Modigliani’s papers at the Economists’ Papers Archive at Duke University.

_______________________

15.46 FINANCE
E. Kuh
Fall Semester, 1962

I. CAPITAL MARKETS (2 weeks)

W.L. Smith, “Monetary Policy and Debt Management”, Chapter 9, Staff Report on Employment, Growth and Price Levels, Joint Economic Committee, 1959, pp. 315-407.

R. L. Rierson, The Investment Outlook, Bankers Trust Co., 1962.

II. CAPITAL BUDGETING (8 weeks)

A. Decision Criteria—New Asset Demand

P. Massé, Optimal Investment Decisions, Ch. 1.

V. L. Smith, Investment and Production, Ch. 1, Ch. 3, pp. 62-72, Ch. 9.

E. Solomon, editor, The Management of Corporate Capital, Essays II—3, 5, 6, 7, 8.

D. Bowdenhorn, “Problems in the Theory of Capital Budgeting”, Journal of Finance, December 1959, pp. 473-92.

B. Decision Criteria—Replacement Demand

V. L. Smith, Investment and Production, Ch. 5.

P. Massé, Optimal Investment Decisions, Ch. 2.

C. Cost of Capital—Risk and Uncertainty

H. Markowitz, Portfolio Selection, 1959, pp. 1-34, 180-201, 287-97.

J. Hirschleifer, “Risk, the Discount Rate and investment Decisions”, Proceedings of the American Economic Association, May, 1961, pp. 112-120.

F. Modigliani and M. H. Miller, The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment, American Economic Review, June, 1958, pp. 473-492.

L. Fisher, “Determinants of Risk Premiums on Corporation Bonds”, Journal of Political Economy, June, 1959, pp. 217-37.

E. Kuh, “Capital Theory and Capital Budgeting”, Metroeconomics, (August-December, 1960), pp. 64-80.

D. Cost of Capital—Rationing

V. L. Smith, Investment and Production, Ch. 7.

E. Kuh, Capital Stock Growth, excerpts from Ch. 2 (mimeo).

E. Solomon, ed., The Management of Corporate Capital, Essay II-4.

III. DIVIDEND POLICY (2 weeks)

J. Lintner, “Distribution of Incomes of Corporations Among Dividends, Retaining Earnings, and Taxes,” American Economic Review, Supplement, May, 1956.

S. Dobrovolsky, Corporate Income Retention, 1915-1943.

IV. CURRENT POSITION (1 week)

D. Greenlaw, “Liquidity Variations Among Selected Manufacturing Companies,” M.I.T. Masters Thesis, 1957.

C. H. Silberman, “The Big Corporation Lenders,” in Readings in Finance from Fortune, Holt, 1958.

V. DEPRECIATION (2 weeks)

R. Eisner, “Depreciation Allowances, Replacement Requirements and Growth,” American Economic Review, December, 1952.

E. C. Brown, “The New Depreciation Policy Under the Income Tax: An Economic Appraisal,” National Tax Journal, March, 1955.

Article on Depreciation Practices in Europe, National City Bank Newsletter, September, 1960.

E. C. Brown, “Tax Incentives for Investment”, Proceedings, American Economic Review, May, 1962, pp. 335-45.

William H. White, “Illusions in the Marginal Investment Subsidy”, National Tax Journal, March 1962.

E. C. Brown, “Comments on Tax Credits as Investment Incentives”, National Tax Journal, June 1962, pp. 198-204.

 

Source:  Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Economists’ Papers Archive. Franco Modigliani Papers, Box T1, Folder: “Capital Markets, 15.432. Spring 1963”.

Image Source: MIT Museum website. People: Kuh, Edwin.

Categories
Berkeley Economists Gender

Berkeley. Economics Ph.D. Alumna, Marjorie Ruth Clark, 1929.

 

Today’s post is another in the series “Meet an Economics Ph.D. alumna”. Marjorie Ruth Clark’s professional career took her from Berkeley (undergraduate and graduate education) to Nebraska (Home Economics) to Washington, D.C. (Departments of Agriculture and Labor) with about a fifteen year marriage/family “break” in between. 

______________________

Dates

Born 18 December, 1899 in Eureka, Walla Walla, Washington.

Returned from France in June 1927.

University of California (Berkeley) Ph.D. 1929: Thesis “French syndicalism (1910-1927).

Source: University of California Graduate Division. Record of Theses Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of California, 1926 -1931. Supplement to Record for 1885-1926 (University of California, 1932),p. 23.

1936: Assistant director of the Labor Relations Division of the Resettlement Administration, Washington, D.C.  “She has been associate research professor of economics at the University of Nebraska, and a member of the Research Staff of the American Federation of Labor.”

Married Max Allen Egloff  12 March 1941  in Washington, D.C.

1959: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Assistant Commissioner, Publications and Program Planning. Office of Publications, Chief of the Special Publications Branch. Salary $9,890.

Source: United States Civil Service Commission. Official Register of the United States, 1959.

Died 16 March 1988 in Baltimore, Md. (Burial in Arlington National Cemetery)

______________________

From newspaper reports in Nebraska

“Saturday, Dec. 22 saw the marriage of Miss Marjorie Ruth Clark to William John Hiller.” [Note: I have not found any other reference to this, perhaps annulled?]

Source: Nebraska State Journal (Lincoln Nebraska) 27 Jan 1929, p. 21.

 

Dr. Marjorie Ruth Clark of the agricultural college. Report of her survey of 180 households raising chickens. 197 women started, less than a score have dropped out. “Dr. Clark pays each of the recorders $1 a month”.

Source: The Lincoln Star (Lincoln, Nebraska) 7 November 1929, p. 22.

 

Miss Marjorie Ruth Clark associate professor in home economics research at Nebraska university, spent August 1930 studying organized labor and observing labor conditions in Mexico. Most work done in Mexico City in the government libraries.

Source: The Lincoln Star (Lincoln, Nebraska) 28 Sep 1930, p. 4.

 

Marjorie Ruth Clark Ph.D., associate professor of economics at the University of Nebraska, was awarded one of the research fellowships for 1931 by the Social Science Research Council.

Source: The Lincoln Star (Lincoln, Nebraska) 8 March 1931, p. 5.

 

Marjorie Ruth Clark, assistant [sic] professor of home economics at the university of Nebraska. Received on of thirty research fellowships by the Social Science Research council. Her fellowship extended for four months. “received her degree as doctor of philosophy in California and came to the University of Nebraska in 1928. Her home is at 1144 So. 11th.”

Source: The Nebraska State Journal (Lincoln, Nebraska) 10 Apr. 1932, p. 12.

 

Granted four months leave of absence by the University of Nebraska (home economics department). Left Sunday for Washington “where she will work with the labor advisory board for the NRA and with the A.F. of L. in assisting in the representation of labor interests at code hearings and the preparation of labor briefs in connection with the various codes.”

Source: The Lincoln Star (Lincoln, Nebraska).. 4 October 1933, p. 7.

______________________

Washington Post Obituary

MARJORIE RUTH CLARK EGLOFF
Labor Economist

Marjorie Ruth Clark Egloff, 88, a labor economist who had worked for the Department of Labor and the Department of Agriculture in Washington, died of congestive heart failure March 16 at St. Joseph Hospital in Baltimore.

Dr. Egloff was born in Walla Walla, Wash. She graduated from the University of California at Berkeley. She studied at the Sorbonne in Paris, then returned to Berkeley where she received a doctorate in labor economics.

She was on the faculty at the University of Nebraska before moving to Washington in the 1930s and joining the Department of Agriculture as a specialist on French and Mexican labor movements.

In 1940 [sic] she married Max Allen Egloff. They lived in the Caribbean during the 1940s and early 1950s, then returned to the Washington area. After the death of her husband in 1956 Dr. Egloff went to work for the Labor Department. She retired in 1965.

She wrote several books on labor movements in Mexico, France and elsewhere, and in retirement she edited yearly presidential manpower reports.

Dr. Egloff was a member of the National Press Club, the Woman’s National Democratic Club and the Westmoreland Congregational Church.

She lived in Washington before moving to Towson, Md., in 1985.

Survivors include two children, Dr. Allen C. Egloff of Arnold, Md., and Susan Egloff Efnor of Redlands, Calif., and two grandchildren.

Source: The Washington Post, March 19, 1988.

______________________

Publications

Clark, Marjorie Ruth. The British Labour Government in Contemporary Opinion. University of California, Berkeley. M.A. thesis, 1925.

______________. Syndicalism in France, 1910-1927. University of California Publications in Economics (Vol. 8, no. 1), Berkeley, 1928. Ph.D. thesis, 484 pages.

______________ and Greta Gray. Water Carried for Household Purposes on Nebraska Farms. Bulletin, University of Nebraska, Agricultural Experiment Station, 234. Lincoln: University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, 1929.

______________. A History of the French Labor Movement (1910-1928). University of California Press, 1930.

______________. French Syndicalism of the Present. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 38 (June 1930), pp. 317-27.

Grace Margaret Morton and Marjorie Ruth Clark, “Income and Expenditures of Women Faculty Members in the University of Nebraska,” Journal of Home Economics, 1930.

______________ and Greta Gray. The Routine and Seasonal Work of Nebraska Farm Women. Bulletin, University of Nebraska, Agricultural Experiment Station, 238. Lincoln: University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, 1930.

______________. The Contribution of Nebraska Farm Women to Farm Income through Poultry and Dairy Products.  Bulletin, University of Nebraska, Agricultural Experiment Station, 258. Lincoln: University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, 1931.

______________. Organized Labor and the Family-Allowance System in France, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 39 (August 1931), pp. 526-37.

______________. History of the French Labor Movement (1910-1928). Diritto del labor, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 577ff.

______________. Organized Labor in Mexico. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1934.

______________. Recent History of Labor Organization. American Academy of Political and Social Science, Annals, Vol. 184 (March 1936), pp. 161ff.

______________. Recent History of Labor OrganizationThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 184 (1936): 161-68.

______________, and S. Fanny Simon. The Labor Movement in America New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1938.

______________. A Look at American Labor in 1959. Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 83, No. 1 (January 1960), pp. 10-17.

______________, ed. From the Best of the Monthly Labor ReviewMonthly Labor Review, Vol. 88, No. 7, pp. 787-802.

 

Image Source: Marjorie Clark, junior year picture. University of California yearbook, The 1918 Blue and Gold, p. 358. (Record of 1916-17 published by the Junior Class in 1917)

 

Categories
Exam Questions Gender Harvard

Harvard. Political Economy Examination for Women, 1878

 

The motivation behind the examinations offered by Harvard University to women (beginning in 1874) was “to afford persons desirous of becoming teachers in schools such a diploma of competency for their task as would be received on all hands with respect, and, further, to promote a higher standard of attainments in the private schools attended by the wealthier classes, by thus securing them thoroughly qualified teachers.” However, it was understood that “the preparation for these examinations [was not] equivalent to a course in Harvard, or other first-class colleges, and that they did not place the same value on a Harvard diploma and a Harvard certificate.”

The Harvard 1874 Advanced Examination in Political Economy for Women was previously posted.

The examination was based on Henry Fawcett’s “Manual of Political Economy” [1874] and Jérôme-Adolphe Blanqui’s “Histoire de l’Économie Politique en Europe.” [4e èd. Rev. et annot. (1860). Tome PremierTome Second]

________________________

POLITICAL ECONOMY.
FAWCETT.

  1. Distinguish productive labor and productive consumption from unproductive. Are “useful” and “productive” convertible terms in political economy?
  2. What is capital? How does the popular use of the term differ from its scientific use? When Macleod contends that “credit is capital,” what is the real point of difference between him and other writers
  3. What causes determine the prices of manufactured commodities, temporarily and in the long run? How do the causes which determine the prices of agricultural commodities differ from the above?
  4. 1What determines the value of money? 2How far does it receive value from being coined and made a legal tender? 3What determines the value of inconvertible paper? 4Does it receive value from being made a legal tender? 5When a legal tender, is its value affected by the greater or less chance of its being paid off?
  5. Explain carefully Ricardo’s theory of rent, showing under what conditions rent can be an element of price, and explaining the application of the theory to a country like the United States, where the cultivators, as a rule, own the land.
  6. What causes the observed tendency of profits to fall as a country advances in age, wealth, and population?
  7. State the general principles which determine the exchange of commodities between two countries. How and why does this international trade differ from domestic trade?
  8. Why do the exports of India regularly exceed her imports, and the exports of the British Islands fall short of their imports? How are these facts to be reconciled with the general principle that the exports of a country must balance its imports?
  9. The United States being a gold-producing country, would exchange on Europe, when commerce is in its normal condition, be “in our favor,” against us, or at par? Why? Would this state of things be for our disadvantage or not?
  10. When a building, e. g., a store, is built on valuable ground and a tax is laid as usual on the total value, what will be the incidence of the tax? Will it have this incidence at once, or in the long run? Suppose the premises are held under a lease for a term of years?
  11. If a tax were laid at a uniform rate on all property of every description, would it meet the requirements of Adam Smith’s first rule?
  12. If a government has a large expenditure to make (1) in some productive enterprise, or (2) for some unproductive purpose, is it better that the amount should be raised at once by taxation, or by loan?

 

BLANQUI.

  1. Contrast the system on which the Bank of Amsterdam and the Bank of England were respectively established.
  2. What was the English act of navigation? When and why was it passed? What position do Adam Smith and J. S. Mill take as to its expediency?
  3. When did the “French Economists” flourish, and what were the distinctive characteristics of that school?
  4. Give what account you can of Turgot and his reforms.
  5. What was “the continental blockade,” and what were its economic effects, both before and after the declaration of peace?
  6. Under what circumstances was Malthus led to write his Essay on Population?
  7. What contribution did J. B. Say make, or what service did he render, to economic science?
  8. Give what account you can of the socialist system of St. Simon.
  9. What share had Ricardo, Mill, and Cairnes, respectively, in the development of the system of political economy, and in what relations do they stand to each other as writers developing the same subject?

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examination papers, 1873-1915 (HUC 7000.25), Box 2. Bound volume: Examination Papers 1878-79. Harvard University Examinations. Papers Used at the Examinations for Women held at Cambridge, New York, Philadelphia, and Cincinnati, May 29 to June 6, 1878. Cambridge, Mass., 1878, pp. 42-44.

 

Image Sources:

Henry Fawcett (left) The University of Glasgow Story website; Jérôme-Adolphe Blanqui (right): Austrian National Library. Website Bildarchiv Austria.

 

 

 

Categories
Economists Gender Home Economics Johns Hopkins Vassar

Johns Hopkins University. Economics Ph.D. Alumna, social economist/home economist, Helen Potter, 1942

 

Looking for examination artifacts to transcribe, I went through my files for the Johns Hopkins University Department of Political Economy and decided (arbitrarily) to sample from the 1941-42 academic year’s graduate examinations. The exams in the folder were tailored as exit exams for those candidates for the PhD  who had completed dissertations. The name of the PhD candidate for two of the exams (transcribed in the next post) was Helen Potter. I figured this was serendipity begging for an addition to the Meet-an-economics-PhD-alumna/us gallery. And so the hunt was on to find out what ever became of Helen Potter.

While I have not been able to double-check every academic claim listed in the materials included below, in particular confirmation of degrees from New York University and Purdue (perhaps honorary), the main stations of Helen Potter’s professional career can indeed be verified. One may presume her 1969 AEA biographical listing would have included an assistant professorship at Johns Hopkins, if she ever had one (It doesn’t! But her Lafayette obituary does.).

Helen Potter, a 1933 Vassar graduate, almost immediately became active in the newly founded Catholic Economists’ Association (later re-named Association for Social Economics) upon receiving her PhD from Johns Hopkins in 1942. Her service included decades of editorial work for the Association’s journal as well as the establishment of the Helen Potter award in 1975 which turns out to harvest most of the Google-hits found when conducting a search on her name. The Association for Social Economics can be fairly characterised as one of the older heterodox bins of economics. Ultimately Helen Potter was able to return home to Lafayette, Indiana for a professorship in Home Management and Family Economics at Purdue University.

Helen Potter’s papers at Purdue: included in the collection of her father’s (Andrey A. Potter) papers:   Personal Papers of Dr. Helen C. Potter, ca. 1920’s-1986

Fun-fact: Helen Potter’s parents were personal friends of Frank and Lillian Gilbreth of Cheaper by the Dozen fame. Frank Gilbreth, a scientific management guru, was a colleague of Helen’s father on the faculty at Purdue University.

___________________________

AEA Biographical Listing 1969

POTTER, Helen Catherine, academic; b. Manhattan, Kan., 1911; A.B., Vassar Coll., 1933; Ph.D., Johns Hopkins U., 1942. DOC. DIS. Federal Protection for the Consumer, an Economic Analysis, 1942; History of Life Insurance Companies in the U.S., 1934 [published in volume 8 of the Vassar Journal of Undergraduate Studies].  FIELDS 10b, 4a, 6b. PUB. “Consumption,” Chapt. 27, Modern Econs., 1952; Money Management and Mental Health, Jour. of Psychiatric Therapy, 1969; Guidelines for Consumer Education-one of authors of this curriculum guide line for high schools of Illinois, 1969. RES. Evaluation of Consumer Education Today—Purdue Grant from U.S. Office of Ed.; Family Financial Management—Grant Purdue Experiment Station. Asso. prof. econs., Seton Hill Coll., 1943-51; asso. specialist family econs., U. Calif., Davis, 1951-53; asso. prof. fin., Loyola U., 1953-68; prof. family econs., Purdue U. since 1968. ADDRESS 517 Russell St., W. Lafayette, IN 47906.

Source: Biographical Listings of Members, The American Economic Review, Vol. 59, No. 6, 1969 Handbook of the American Economic Association (Jan., 1970), p. 349.

___________________________

PURDUE STUDENT KILLED IN WRECK NEAR LAFAYETTE
(September 1933)

Raymond H. Hilb, 21, of Chicago, a Senior in the mechanical engineering school at Purdue, was instantly killed, and Miss Helen Potter, 18, student at the Lafayette Business College was severely injured last Friday night on the new Delphi-Lafayette paved road, 25, when an automobile in which they were riding with two other persons, was struck by another car driven by George Weckerly, of Delphi, and occupied by Glen Clark, 16-year-old high school student, and Misses Dorothy Gerbens and Mildred Bowman, Delphi high school students. According to Clark’s version of the accident the car in which Hilb was riding drove onto the highway from the Black and White filling station and barbecue, where the car had been filled with gasoline. It was hit in the rear by the car driven by Weckerly. The collision came with terrific force and Hilb was thrown to the pavement, suffering a fractured skull. In the car with Hilb and Miss Potter were Bernard Amber of Gary, and Miss Mary Mitchell, of Lafayette. Hilb was manager of the Purdue University base ball team and was very popular on the college campus.

Source: Flora Hoosier Democrat of Flora, Indiana (September 23, 1933).

___________________________

Work for the National Catholic Community Service
(& Consumers League of NY, BLS, Wells College, Western College)

“Miss Helen Potter, West Lafayette, Ind., has recently taken up her duties as Resource Secretary for the Division.” [Women’s Division of the National Catholic Community Service]…”Miss Potter has served as field worker for the Consumers League of New York, Social Economist in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Instructor of Economics at Wells College Aurora, N.Y., and Western College, Oxford, O.”

Source: Catholic News Service, Newsfeeds, 30 June 1941.

___________________________

Ph.D. 1942, Johns Hopkins University

Helen Potter of the District of Columbia, A.B. Vassar College, 1933.

Political Economy. Thesis: “Federal protection for the consumer: an economic analysis”.

SourceJohns Hopkins University Commencement. June 2, 1942.

___________________________

Miss Potter Joins Purdue Faculty as Prof
(Feb. 21, 1968)

Miss Helen C. Potter has been appointed professor in the Department of Home Management and Family Economics at Purdue university effective Sept. 1.

Miss Potter, a native of Kansas, grew up in West Lafayette where her parents, Dean Emeritus and Mrs. A. A. Potter, still reside. She received her AB degree at Vassar College and her PhD degree from Johns Hopkins University in Political Economy.

She is professor in the Department of Finance at Loyola University in Chicago. Prior to her appointment to Loyola, Miss Potter taught at the University of California at Davis; Seton Hill College in Pennsylvania; Western College in Ohio, and Wells College in New York.

She has been an associate economist in the Bureau of Human Nutrition and Home Economics in the U.S. Department of Agriculture. She also has been associated with the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the U.S. Department of Labor.

[…]

Source:   Journal and Courier of Lafayette, Indiana (Feb. 21, 1968), p. 26.

___________________________

Prof. Helen Potter Comes Home to Teach
(Dec. 4, 1968)

[…]

Prof. Potter grew up in West Lafayette where her father — Dean Emeritus A. A. Potter — still resides. She received her AB degree at Vassar and her PhD from Johns Hopkins University in political economy.

Presently, she is a professor in the Department of Home Management and Family Economics at Purdue, but the road home for her was a long one by way of New York, California and Washington, not to mention a great portion of the Midwest where she taught or consulted in the exciting and complex world of finance.

Her professional experience includes many years as a professor of economics, at several American universities including Loyola of Chicago. In addition she has had government posts with the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Labor.

What’s a professor of finance doing in Purdue’s School of Home Economics? “It’s simple,” explains Miss Potter. “Consumer economics and the relations between business and customer are extremely important parts of our curricula.”

At the core of this education it is the individual who looks at himself to see what he wants out of life and how he can most effectively attain it. “It teaches the consumer how to make decisions for using limited resources to satisfy unlimited wants,” says the fragile looking professor who’s spent the last 15 years teaching male executives from some of the largest businesses about their dependence on society and their reciprocal responsibilities.

Equally important to Miss Potter is teaching the consumer how to use his time, energy and money to obtain a better life. “While showing him the relevance of economic principles to personal economic competence, it gives him the basic understanding which is a requisite for citizenship,” she added.

[…]

In addition to her teaching, Prof. Potter is involved in the research assignment of cataloging present consumer education in this country — a gigantic task. For her, it is tremendously exciting. “You might even say it’s a hobby,” she muses, “for all my life I’ve collected materials in consumer education.”

Looking thoroughly relaxed, surrounded by hundreds of volumes on property insurance, statistical methods and investments, the animated professor speaks warmly about her homecoming. “I’ve found life here very exciting both in the community and at the university. The inter-disciplinary activity among the schools is splendid, and I find my students to be the best I’ve ever had.”

Having taught men for so many years, Miss Potter had the notion that women would be less interested in the subject matter and that they would be weighted down with insurmountable family problems, since all are graduate students some returnees with growing children and much family responsibility. Instead, she finds them hardworking, studious and dedicated.

[…]

SourceJournal and Courier of Lafayette, Indiana (Dec. 4, 1968), p. 12.

___________________________

Helen C. Potter, 75, retired Purdue professor
Obituary (October 23, 1986)

Helen C. Potter, 75, a, retired professor of home management and family economics at Purdue University, died at 9:46 a.m. Tuesday in St. Elizabeth Hospital, where she had been a patient one week. Miss Potter, 814 S. 14th St., was the daughter of the late Professor A.A. and Eva Burtner Potter. He was a former dean of engineering at Purdue. The new engineering building was named in his honor.

Miss Potter was born March 18, 1911, in Manhattan, Kan. She received degrees from Vassar College, Johns Hopkins University, New York University and Purdue. She graduated from West Lafayette High School in 1928.

She taught and lectured at the University of California, Davis, was an associate professor and chairman of -the department of economics at Seton Hill College in Greensburg, Pa., was assistant professor at St. Francis College in Lafayette, was an instructor and chairman of the department of economics at Western College in Oxford, Ohio, was an assistant professor in the Department of political economy at Johns Hopkins University.

She also was an assistant at the College of Notre Dame in Baltimore, taught at Wells College in Aurora, N.Y., and was an associate professor in the Department of Finance at Loyola University.

Besides her teaching responsibilities, Miss Potter spent one year at the Library of Congress doing research on economics, worked for the Better Business Bureau in Pittsburgh, Pa., was an associate economist of human nutrition and home economics for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C., was a statistician and director of personnel for the National Catholic Community Service, and was a junior social economist for the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor.

She organized and served as chairman of the Tippecanoe Consumers Council, worked with the League of Women Voters, National Council of Catholic Women, the American Association of University Women, and was active in the National Association for Social Economics.

Miss Potter was a member of St. Boniface Catholic Church, Mary L. Mathews Home Economics Club and the Parlor Club. She also served as deanery president of the National Council of Catholic Women in the Lafayette Diocese.

Surviving is a brother, James G. Potter of Indialantic, Fla.

Source: Journal Courier of Lafayette, Indiana (October 23, 1986), p. 22.

___________________________

A Memorial Tribute from the Association for Social Economics

Member of the first (May 1948) board of editors of the journal Review of Social Economy, associate editor up to her death October 21, 1986. Also an official portrait Helen C. Potter in included with the brief note.

Source: IN MEMORIAM.” Review of Social Economy 45, no. 3 (1987).

___________________________

Helen C. Potter Scholarship, Johns Hopkins University

This scholarship is awarded to students in the field of political economy.

________________________

Helen Potter Award of the the Association for Social Economics

The Helen Potter Award was created and endowed in 1975. It is presented each year to the author of the best article in the Review of Social Economy by a promising scholar of social economics. Award recipients receive a plaque and a $500 prize.

Recent recipients:

2019 Céline Bonnefond & Fatma Mabrouk
2018 C. W. M. Naastepad & Jesse M. Mulder
2017 Michael J. Roy & Michelle T. Hackett
2016 Caroline Shenaz Hossein
2015 Karen Evelyn Hauge
2014 Peter-Wim Zuidhof
2013 Ayman Reda
2012 Pavlina Tcherneva
2011 Adel Daoud
2010 Aurelie Charles
2009 Huascar F. Pessali
2008 Sebastian Berger
2007 Nuno Martins
2006 Mark Hayes
2005 Benedetta Giovanola
2004 Ellen Mutari
2003 Geoffrey E. Schneider
2002 Stephen T. Ziliak
2001 Wilfred Dolfsma
2000 John E. Murray

Source: The Association for Social Economics website.

 

Image Source:  Portrait of Helen C. Potter, A.B., Instructor of Social Science.  Western College for Women (Oxford, Ohio) Yearbook, Multifaria 1941.

Categories
Bibliography Gender Socialism Sociology

New Bibliographic Resource. Links to the Swan Sonnenschein Social Science Series, 1884-1912

 

 

The Social Science series of the London publisher Swan and Sonnenschein comprised 120 books back at the turn of the 20th century. Economics in the Rear-view Mirror now has a page with links to 116 of the titles

Categories
Cambridge Exam Questions Gender

Cambridge. Local Examinations Syndicate’s Political Economy and Logic Exams, 1870-72

This post provides three years’ worth of exams for the subjects of political economy and logic that constituted Group D of a battery of exams created and graded by fellows and tutors of the University of Cambridge that were taken by women wishing to become teachers and needed to have their educational achievements certified. The volume from which the following information has been transcribed covers the period 1870-1872. Miscellaneous examination rules/procedures and examiners’ reports have been included as well. Texts by John Stuart Mill,  John Elliott Cairnes and Adam Smith were the primary material for the political economy examinations with John Stuart Mill’s Logic and works by Richard Whately, William Thomson and Alexander Bain covered in the logic examinations.

____________________________

Backstory of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.

Cambridge Assessment was established as the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES) by the University of Cambridge in 1858. [It was] set up to administer local examinations for students who were not members of the University of Cambridge, with the aim of raising standards in education. [UCLES] also inspected schools.

[…]

1858

UCLES, The University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate was formed to set school leaving examinations for non-members of the university. The Syndicate comprised thirteen university academics (one as Secretary) who would set regulations, write question papers, preside over examinations, mark scripts and make the awards. The examinations were held in December to avoid conflict with the Oxford Examinations in July and the first centres were in Birmingham, Brighton, Bristol, Cambridge, Grantham, Liverpool, London and Norwich.

1862

It was decided that the Syndicate’s remit be extended to offer inspections to schools as part of the examination programme offered by the University of Cambridge.

1864

The first overseas examinations were held by UCLES in Trinidad where six candidates took the Cambridge Senior Examinations.

1868

After a successful trial in 1863 by candidates from the North London Collegiate School and a subsequent petition to the University, girls were officially allowed to enter for the Cambridge Local Examinations on the same basis as boys.

1869

The Higher Local Examinations were introduced, initially for women over eighteen who wished to become teachers. Although the HLE was discontinued in 1922 it had, by then, spawned the Certificate of Proficiency in English, the longest surviving of all UCLES examinations.

http://web.archive.org/web/20200719152624/https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/about-us/who-we-are/our-heritage/

____________________________

University of Cambridge. Examination for Women.
Examination Papers for the Examination held in July, 1870
with lists of Syndics and Examiners
to which are added the Regulations for the Examination in 1871.

Cambridge: Printed at the University Press, 1870.

https://archive.org/details/examinationforw00unkngoog/page/n7/mode/2up

EXAMINATION FOR WOMEN.
[p. 4]

The following Scheme of Examinations for Women was sanctioned by Grace of the Senate, Oct, 29, 1868.

  1. That an Examination be held once in every year for women who have completed 18 years of age before the 1st of January of the year in which the Examination takes place.
  2. That this Examination be under the superintendence of the Syndicate constituted by Grace of the Senate February 11, 1858 for the conduct of the Examinations of Students who are not members of the University.
  3. That the Examinations be held in such places as the Syndicate may approve.
  4. That the Candidates be required to pay fees at the discretion of the Syndicate.
  5. That every Candidate be examined in Religious Knowledge unless she declare in writing her objection to such Examination.
  6. That neither the names of the Candidates nor any Class Lists be published.
  7. That the Candidates who have satisfied the Examiners receive Certificates, and those who have passed the Examination with credit. Certificates of Honour.
  8. That this Scheme continue in force for three years, so as to include the Examinations of 1869, 1870, and 1871.

RECOMMENDATIONS TO LOCAL COMMITTEES.
[p. 7]

  1. The Examination room must be large enough to accommodate all the Candidates.
  2. Desks must be provided so as to allow to all the Candidates at least four feet in length apiece, without requiring them to be seated on opposite sides.
  3. The desks for drawing must be so placed that the Candidates may have the light upon their left hand, unless the room be lighted from the top.
  4. A table in each of the Examination rooms, and one drawer or cupboard furnished with lock and key, will be required for the use of the Examiner.
  5. Pens, ink, writing and blotting paper must be provided. The paper must be of the size called “Cambridge Scribbling Demy.” Each sheet should be cut in four, and may be ruled or not. If ruled, the ruling of each quarter-sheet should be parallel to the shorter sides. Paper of this size can be procured from Spalding and Hodge, 145, Drury Lane; King and Loder, 239, Thames Street; Batty, Partington and Son, 174, Aldersgate Street, London; and from all Stationers in Cambridge.
    The quarter-sheets must have a hole punched in the left-hand top corner, and pack thread or the metal binders sold by Perry and Co. should be provided in order to fasten each student’s papers together.
  6. The Local Committee should arrange so that at least one of their number may attend in the Examination room.
    The writing-paper, &c. should be distributed for the use of the Candidates ten minutes before the hours fixed for the commencement of work.

Examiners for Political Economy and Logic for July 1870
[p. 6]

The following gentlemen were appointed by the Syndicate

Examiner in Political Economy for July 1870:  Rev. J. B. Mayor, M.A. late Fellow of St. John’s College.

Examiner in Logic: Ref. F. J. A. Hort, M.A. late Fellow of Trinity College.

Examination Questions for July, 1870

GROUP D.
Thursday, July 7, 1870. 4 to 6 ½

Political Economy.
[p. 50]

  1. Classify the advantages derived from Division of Labour.
  2. Distinguish between Price, Cost, Value in Use, and Value in Exchange. On what does the last depend?
  3. Examine the consequences of the substitution of machinery for hand labour in general, and particularly in the case of agriculture.
  4. Give an account of Cottier Tenure, explaining what is meant by Conacre and Tenant Right.
  5. Give a short account of the English Poor Law at the present time. What objections have been made to it?
  6. What are the principles which should guide the practice of Almsgiving?
  7. What are the uses of a Circulating Medium? Point out the mischiefs arising from its depreciation. What were the French Assignats?
  8. The use and abuse of Trades Unions.
  9. What regulates International Values?
  10. Discuss whether the expenses of a war should be met by Loan or Tax.
  11. Mention the principal errors of the Political Economists who preceded Adam Smith.
  12. The influence of Political Economy upon English legislation during the last forty years.

 

Wednesday, July 6, 1870. 12 to 2.

Logic.
[p. 51]

  1. Distinguish the several uses of language for purposes of thought. What are meant by First and Second Intentions?
  2. In what sense have words been compared to counters? Shew to what extent the comparison is just, and where it is misleading.
  3. What is meant by Division in Logic? State and exemplify its rules. Give instances of cross-division.
  4. Explain the saying that the subject of a judgement is in the predicate, and the predicate in the subject. Point out the various aspects of the double relation here intended.
  5. Explain and exemplify the Fallacy of Interrogation. What is meant by its being classified as a Fallacy of Ambiguous Middle?
  6. A. “The sky is cloudy; so we may expect rain.” B. “Yet it has been cloudy for some days, and not a drop has fallen.” A. “All the more reason for the rain to come now.” Put these three arguments into a logical form, supplying whatever is assumed; and examine the validity of each.
  7. What do you understand by Deduction, and what is its use in scientific investigation?
  8. Describe the characteristics of Empirical Laws. Why are they called laws, and why empirical?
  9. What are the respective advantages of observation and experiment?
  10. Explain distinctly what is meant by a classification according to Natural Groups. How is such a classification related to the classification involved in all use of general names?

Regulations for the Examination in 1871.
[pp. 63-66]

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE.
EXAMINATIONS FOR WOMEN.

There will be an Examination, commencing on Monday, July 3, 1871, open to Women who have completed the age of 18 years before Jan. 1, 1871.

Candidates will be examined in such places as the Syndics appointed by the University may determine.

The Syndicate will entertain applications from places where 25 fees at the least are guaranteed. Application must be made not later than April 1, 1871.

Before any application for an Examination can be approved, the Syndicate must be satisfied as to the following points:—

That there is a Committee of ladies who will efficiently superintend the Examination, one of whom will undertake to act as Local Secretary.

That this Committee will see that suitable accommodation can be obtained by Candidates who are strangers to the place.

That a responsible person will be at hand to receive the Examination papers from the conducting Examiner and collect the answers.

Committees wishing to have Examinations held in their several districts, may obtain all necessary information from the

Rev. G. F. BROWNE.
St Catharine’s College, Cambridge.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

  1. Every one admitted to Examination will be required to pay a fee of forty shillings. After a Certificate has been obtained, the fee in any subsequent year will be twenty shillings.
  2. Papers will be set in the subjects grouped and numbered as below. Every Candidate who has not already passed in group A is required to satisfy the Examiners in all the papers set in that group, with the exception that the papers in Religious Knowledge may be omitted by any Candidate who at the time of her application for admission to the Examination declares her objection to be examined in Religious Knowledge.
  3. The Candidates who satisfy the Examiners will receive Certificates to that effect, and those who pass the Examination with credit, Certificates of Honour. Every Certificate will specify the subjects in which the Candidate has passed.
  4. No Certificate will be granted to any Candidate who has not passed in group A and also in one of groups B, C, D and E.
  5. The names of the Candidates who pass in each group will be placed alphabetically in three classes. If a Candidate specially distinguishes herself in particular parts of the Examination, the fact will be notified by endorsement on her Certificate. After each Examination notice of the result will be sent to the home of each Candidate.
  6. A Candidate who passes in group A, but not in the further subjects necessary for obtaining a Certificate, will not be examined in the papers in that group in any future year in which she may go in to the Examination for the purpose of obtaining her Certificate.
  7. No Candidate will be examined in more subjects than the subjoined Time-table will allow.
    After passing in group A, Candidates may be examined in other groups in subsequent years.
    A schedule of books recommended by the Syndicate is appended to each group. But it is to be understood that such schedules are not intended to limit the studies of the Candidates or the range of questions in the papers set by the Examiners.

GROUP A.

  1. *Religious Knowledge.
  2. Arithmetic.
  3. Outlines of English History from the Norman Conquest to the reign of George IV. inclusive. Detailed knowledge of the period from the accession of Charles I. to the death of Cromwell will be required. A knowledge of Geography, so far as it bears on this subject, will be expected.
  4. *English Language and Literature.
  5. Every Candidate in this group will be required to write a short English Composition.

*The papers in these subjects may be taken again in subsequent years by Candidates who wish to obtain distinction in them.

GROUP B.

1. Latin. 2. Greek. 3. French. 4. German. 5. Italian.

Passages will be given for translation into English from the books mentioned in the subjoined schedule, and questions will be set on the language and subject matter of the books. In each language passages will be given for translation from some other authors, and passages of English prose for translation into each.

A knowledge of one of the five languages will enable Candidates to pass in this group. For a Certificate of Honour a knowledge of two will be required.

In the papers in French and Italian, the connexion between these languages and Latin will be included; but a knowledge of Latin will not be insisted upon as necessary for either the Pass or the Honour Certificate.

GROUP C.

  1. Euclid, Books I. II. III. IV. VI. And XI. to Prop. 21 inclusive.
  2. The elementary parts of Algebra; namely, the Rules for the Fundamental Operations upon Algebraical Symbols, with their proof; the solution of Simple and Quadratic Equations; Arithmetical and Geometrical Progression, Permutations and Combinations, the Binomial Theorem and the principles of Logarithms.
  3. The elementary parts of Plane Trigonometry, so far as to include the solution of Triangles.
  4. The simpler properties of the Conic Sections, treated either geometrically or analytically.
  5. The elementary parts of Statics, including the equilibrium of Forces acting in one plane, the properties of the Centre of Gravity, the laws of Friction, and the Mechanical Powers.
  6. The elementary parts of Astronomy, so far as they are necessary for the explanation of the more simple phenomena.
  7. The elementary parts of Dynamics, including the laws of Motion, Gravity, and the Theory of Projectiles.

A knowledge of the first two of these subjects will be required to enable a Candidate to pass in this group. For a Certificate of Honour, a knowledge of two at least of the remaining five will be required in addition.

GROUP D.

1. Political Economy. 2. Logic.

A knowledge of one of these subjects will enable a Candidate to pass in this group. For a Certificate of Honour, a knowledge of both will be required.

GROUP E.

1. Botany. 2. Geology and Physical Geography. 3. Zoology. 4. Chemistry (theoretical and practical).

A knowledge of one of these subjects will enable a Candidate to pass in this group. For a Certificate of Honour, a knowledge of two of them will be required.

GROUP F.

1. Music 2. Drawing.

A paper will be given in the latter subject containing questions on the History of Art

Every Candidate in Drawing is required to bring with her to the Examination one finished drawing, or painting, executed by herself, of such a kind as may best shew her proficiency, and which must be described as a “study from Nature,” an “original drawing,’* or a “copy from a drawing,” as the case may be.

Two hours will be allowed for a sketch, or copy, of some portion or detail of the above work, and this exercise will be judged with the finished work.

The sketch together with the finished drawing will be sent to the Examiner in Drawing. The latter will he returned to the Candidate after inspection by him.

Candidates will also be required to draw from a model.

Proficiency in these subjects will not count towards a Certificate, but will be notified on the Certificate in cases where the Candidate obtains one.

[…]

[Readings for 1871 Examinations]

“It may be expected that about two-thirds of the questions set in each paper will have reference to the books mentioned under the Group to which it belongs.”

[…]

GROUP D.

  1. Mill, Political Economy. Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations.
  2. Mill, Logic. Thomson, Outlines of the Laws of Thought. Whately, Logic, Books II. and III. with App. 2.

[…]

DIRECTIONS TO CANDIDATES.
[p. 69]

  1. Be at your seat in the Examination Room five minutes before the time fixed in the preceding table for the Examination in the several subjects.
    [Note: For Group D, Logic and Geology examinations scheduled for Wednesday July 5 (1871) 12 to 2; Political economy and German examinations scheduled for Thursday, July 6 (1871), 4 to 6 ½.]
  2. Write your index number in the right-hand top corner (not the one with the pinched hole) of every sheet of paper which you use, and your name as well as your number on the first sheet of each set of papers.
  3. Write only on one side of the paper. Fill each sheet before you take another. Leave a blank space after each answer.
  4. Answer the questions as nearly as you can in the order in which they are set, and write the number of each question before the answer.
  5. As soon as notice is given (which will be five minutes before the end of the time allowed), arrange your papers in proper order, so that the first page may be at the top, see that they all have the number by which you are known written upon them, fasten them according to the direction of the Examiner, and give them unfolded to him.
  6. No Candidate can be allowed to give up her papers and leave the room until half an hour has expired from the time at which the papers are given out. A paper will not be given to any Candidate who is more than half an hour late.
  7. No Candidate can be allowed to remain in the Examination Room after her paper is given up to the Local Examiner.

____________________________

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE

EXAMINATION FOR WOMEN
ABOVE EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE

Report of the Syndicate Presented to the Senate, Oct. 30, 1871 with Supplementary Tables.

Cambridge: Printed at the University Press, 1871.

https://archive.org/details/examinationforw00unkngoog/page/n89/mode/2up

GROUP D
Political Economy, Logic
[p. 4]

Number of candidates: 13

Passed in Class I: 2

Passed in Class II: 4

Passed in Class III: 5

Failed: 2

Examiners’ Comments
[p. 7]

Logic. The Examiner finds fault with the manner in which the answers were given. They were marked by a lack of decision and of terseness of expression, arising probably from the want of practice in writing out the answers to definite questions. Some Candidates wasted time in giving reasons for their inability to answer parts of the questions.

Political Economy. The Examiner reports as follows:—I think the examination in Political Economy very satisfactory on the whole. I have met with no brilliant or striking performance; but the majority of papers gave evidence of conscientious and intelligent study of the subject, and shewed an apprehension of principles lively and clear as far as it went, though not profound. There was rarely any irrelevance in the answers; but I noticed sometimes a want of proportion, a disposition to dilate at length on comparatively unimportant points, against which it may be worth while to warn Candidates.

____________________________

University of Cambridge. Examination for Women.

Examination Papers for the Examination held in July 1871
with lists of Syndics and examiners
to which are added the Regulations for the Examination in 1872.

https://archive.org/details/examinationforw00unkngoog/page/n107/mode/2up

Examiners for July 1871
[p. 8]

Logic:  [no one named]

Political Economy: [no one named]

Examination Questions for July 1871
GROUP D
[pp. 46-49]

Thursday, July 6, 1871. 4 to 6½.
Political Economy

  1. Define Labour. Distinguish Productive/Unproductive Labour.
    Under which head would you class the labour of (1) Professors, (2) Policemen?
    Examine the causes of the difference of wages in different employments: explaining, for the sake of illustration,

    1. The low average wages of poets, governesses, plough-boys,
    2. The high average wages of solicitors and navvies.
  2. Why do we pay no wages to Members of Parliament?
  3. Define Capital. Is champagne ever Capital? Is the stock of a theatre? Explain carefully, with whatever qualifications appear necessary, the principle
    “That demand for commodities is not demand for labour.”
    Why then are wages high when trade is good? and what would be the loss to Paris if the spendthrifts of Europe ceased to go there for amusement?
  4. Explain how the kind of wealth produced, and the place and manner of its production, are determined under a system of Free Competition. It has been sometimes thought that the mode of employing capital which would most benefit individual capitalists does not always coincide with that which would most benefit the state. Discuss briefly any opinions of this kind with which you are acquainted, and any legislative measures to which they have given rise.
  5. Explain the distribution of wealth under a system of Free Competition. Mention any other methods of distribution that have historically existed or have been recently proposed: and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the latter.
    If the Metayer system were suddenly made compulsory in England, what would be the probable effects?
  6. Compare Rent with the profit gained by a patent, and that gained by a monopoly.
    It has been said that what is ordinarily called rent is really profit on the capital that has been employed in reclaiming and improving land. Discuss this assertion.
  7. Explain how, and to what extent, Exchange value can be said to be determined both by cost of production and by supply and demand. How is the value (1) of partridges, (2) of mutton, determined in England at present?
    Why is there anything peculiar in the determination of the value of foreign commodities? Sketch the probable effect on our trade with France of an immense discovery of coal in that country.
  8. Discuss the changes in the relative values of different articles, due to the progress of European civilization up to the present time: inquiring how far they are to be explained by general laws and how far by special circumstances. What similar changes are to be expected in the future?
    Illustrate by referring to bullion, com, beef, cloth.
  9. What restrictions are at present imposed on the lending of money or credit? Mention any other restrictions that have actually existed or have been proposed. Discuss the advisability of any of these restrictions.
  10. Give general principles of taxation: and apply them to determine the propriety of

(1) The Income-tax as it at present exists.
(2) The Malt-tax.
(3) A tax on matches.

 

Wednesday, July 5, 1871. 12 to 2.
Logic

  1. Why has the name of Organon been given to Logic? A recent treatise on Logic has been described as “based on a combination of the Old and the New Organon”: what do you understand by this?
  2. Logic is “the science of the operations of the understanding which are subservient to the estimation of evidence.” Is this definition co-extensive with Thomson’s? Does it appear to you a satisfactory one?
  3. What is Language? Shew by examples how it enables us to analyse complex impressions, and to abbreviate the processes of thought.
  4. What is “a system of cognate genera”?
  5. Give an account of the controversy between the Nominalists and the Realists, and explain what is meant by describing it as a question of Method rather than of Metaphysics.
  6. Interpret the judgment — No tyranny is secure — according to Extension, Intension, and Denomination.
  7. What is meant by the Quantification of the Predicate? What are its advantages?
  8. Shew the use of the lines commencing Barbara. Construct examples of Camestres and Bokardo, and reduce them to the First Figure. Discuss the propriety of retaining the Fourth Figure, and the necessity of rules for the reduction of the Second and Third Figures.
  9. Explain and exemplify the fallacy of Division, and that of Composition. To what class are they to be referred? In what way does the ambiguity of the word all sometimes give occasion to one of these fallacies?
  10. Test the following by logical rules:
    1. If the parks were closed, some persons would be aggrieved: but the parks are not closed, therefore no persons are aggrieved.
    2. It is possible that John may come to-morrow ; it is very probable that William will come to-morrow ; it is absolutely certain that Thomas will come to-morrow; therefore it is probable that John, William, and Thomas will come to-morrow.
  11. What is a Law of Nature? When may a Law of Nature be said to be explained? ls it possible that all the sequences of nature will ultimately be resolved into one law?
  12. Discuss one of the following questions: —
    1. What makes “the Exact Sciences” exact?
    2. Are the methods of physical inquiry applicable to moral and political phenomena?
    3. Is it desirable for a scientific man to have a lively imagination ?

Readings for 1872 Examinations
GROUP D
[p. 64]

1. Political Economy. 2. Logic.

1. Mill, Political Economy. *Cairnes, Logical Method of Political Economy. *Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations(McCulloch’s edition).

2. Mill, Logic [Omitting the following: Book I. ch. 3 (except §1); Book II. Ch. 4-7; Book III. Ch. 5 §9 and note, ch. 12, ch. 18, ch 23, ch. 24 (except §1,2); Book V. ch. 3 §3-6; Book VI. Ch. 2]. Whately, Logic, Books II. And III. With App. 2. *Thomson, Outlines of the Laws of Thought. *Mansel, Prolegomena Logica. *Bain, Inductive and Deductive Logic.

___________________

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
EXAMINATION FOR WOMEN

Examination Papers For the Examination Held in June 1872
to which are added The Regulations for the Examination in 1873.

https://archive.org/details/examinationforw00unkngoog/page/n178/mode/2up

Examiners for June 1872
[p. 8]

Logic: Rev. J. B. Pearson, M.A., Fellow of St John’s College.

Political Economy: Rev. W. M. Campion, M.A., Fellow and Tutor of Queen’s College.

Examination Questions for June 1872
GROUP D
[pp. 51-54]

Wednesday, June 19, 1872. 12 m. to 2 p.m.
Logic

  1. Assuming that Logic is correctly defined as ‘the Science of the Laws of Formal Thinking,’ investigate the relation between Logic and Psychology, and between Logic and Grammar.
  2. Discuss briefly from Mill’s point of view the statements (a) that Logic is entirely conversant about language, (b) that it is the art of discovering truth, (c) that it is an a priori
  3. How does Mill distinguish between abstract and concrete terms? Is the distinction as drawn by him identical with that drawn by Thomson between abstract and concrete representations? Does he regard adjectives as abstract or concrete?
  4. Give an account of the logical processes known by the name of Conversion.
  5. Construct original concrete syllogisms in Festino, Darapti, Bokardo. Express each according to Hamilton’s method of notation. Reduce them to the First Figure, explaining how the various letters in the words guide you in doing so.
  6. Explain the terms Dilemma, Enthymeme, Sorites, Differentia, Cross-division, Undistributed Middle, Petitio Principii.
  7. ‘The sole invariable antecedent of a phenomenon is probably its cause.’ Of which of Mill’s four methods of Experimental Inquiry is this a statement? Discuss its utility as an instrument for the investigation of Nature.
  8. Distinguish between the Terminology and the Nomenclature of a science. Can the Terminology of a science be satisfactory, when its Nomenclature is unsatisfactory ?
  9. How does Mill classify Fallacies? Give an account of the class under which he includes ‘attempts to resolve phenomena radically different into the same.’
  10. Give Bain’s account of the method of arranging a ‘Science of Classification.’
  11. State the following arguments in simple and complete logical form, test them by recognised logical rules, and give the name of the argument or fallacy as the case may be:
    (a) His imbecility of character might have been inferred from his proneness to favourites; for all weak princes have this failing.
    (b) Improbable events happen almost every day; but what happens almost every day is a very probable event ; therefore improbable events are very probable events.
    (c) By what means did he gain that high and honourable place? Certainly not by integrity and devotion to duty, for unfortunately many consummate scoundrels are successful applicants for such posts of trust.
  12. Give the heads of such an essay as you would write in two hours upon the application of the Deductive Method to the Science of Society.

Thursday, June 20, 1872. 4 to 6½.
Political Economy

  1. What is the province of Political Economy? What definitions of the science have been suggested? State which you prefer, and give reasons for your preference.
  2. State the requisites of production; and distinguish between productive and unproductive labour.
    How would you class the labour of Actors, Literary Lecturers, Professors, Barristers?
  3. Define Capital, fixed Capital, circulating Capital.
    What phenomena may be expected to be exhibited during the rapid conversion of circulating Capital into fixed Capital and to that conversion?
  4. Establish the principle:
    “Demand for commodities is not demand for labour.”
    Can you mention any case in which this principle is not applicable?
  5. Examine the effect on production caused by the separation of employments.
    Account for the different rates of wages in different employments, and for the different rates of gross profits in different trades.
  6. What was “the mercantile system”?
    Give a brief account of the agricultural systems of Political Economy as they are described by Adam Smith.
  7. State Ricardo’s theory of rent. What objections have been made to it? Examine their validity. How does Adam Smith’s theory of farm-rents differ from Ricardo’s?
  8. “It may and often does happen that a country imports an article from another, though it might be possible to produce the imported article with less cost in the importing country than in that from which it is imported.”
    How do you explain this seeming paradox?
  9. What is the Malthusian doctrine of population?
    What result do you consider would follow in England if the mortality among young children of the labouring class were very materially reduced?
  10. “Ireland pays dearer for her imports in consequence of her absentees.”
    Establish this proposition.
  11. Discuss the policy of the English poor-law from an economical point of view.
  12. “There are no public institutions for the education of women, and there is accordingly nothing useless, absurd, or fantastical in the common course of their education.”
    What was Adam Smith’s opinion with respect to endowments for educational purposes? To what extent do you conceive that he was influenced in making the foregoing statement by his individual experience?
  13. Discuss one of the following assertions:

(1) A country will always have as much pauperism as it chooses to pay for.
(2) Educational endowments are employed more advantageously in assisting learners than in paying teachers.

Readings for 1873 Examinations
GROUP D
[pp. 67-68]

1. Political Economy. 2. Logic.

A knowledge of one of these subjects will enable a Candidate to pass in this group. For a Certificate of Honour, a knowledge of both will be required.

1. Mill, Political Economy. *Cairnes, Logical Method of Political Economy. *Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations(McCulloch’s edition).

2. Mill, Logic [Omitting the following: Book I. ch. 3 (except §1); Book II. Ch. 4-7; Book III. Ch. 5 §9 and note, ch. 13, ch. 18, ch 23, ch. 24 (except §1,2); Book V. ch. 3 §3-6; Book VI. Ch. 2]. Whately, Logic, Books II. And III. With App. 2. *Thomson, Outlines of the Laws of Thought. *Bain, Inductive and Deductive Logic.

 

Source: Excerpts from several University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate publications.

 

Categories
Bryn Mawr Chicago Economists Gender Home Economics Illinois Radcliffe

Bryn Mawr. Economics Ph.D. Alumna. Lorinda Jane Perry, 1913.

 

This new entry in the series “Meet an economics Ph.D. alumna/us” features the 1913 Bryn Mawr Ph.D., Lorinda Jane Perry. Details about the last 25 years of her life are relatively scarce compared to the events leading up to her last academic position as an associate professor at Hunter College in New York City, i.e. up through the first half of the 1920s. She apparently left economics to go to the Law School at the University of Chicago and as of the 1940 Census was sharing a home in Chicago with four likewise single siblings (a former member of the Illinois Legislature, an attorney, a urologist in private practice and a medical doctor working in the Health Department). 

___________________

Lorinda Jane Perry
Timeline

1884. Born December 23rd in Melvin, Illinois.

1900-1904. Illinois State Normal University.

From the Index, 1904 Yearbook of I.S.N.U.

While in high school I burned with a desire to know all of the latest slang. But that fire has been quenched. Now I can’t bear such expressions as “Oh! Deah,” or “By Jinks” and others. Now I see the wrong and wish to form a society for the “Purification of the American Girl’s Language.” I have not outlined my course of action, but hope some day to sing with the poet:

“Hail to the graduating girl, who is sweeter far than some,
Who when she talks, speaks no slang and chews no chewing gum.”

Between 1904 and 1906. Lorinda Perry taught in country schools near Melvin and Monmouth, Ill.

1906-1909. A.B. in Economics and History at the University of Illinois.

1909-1910. A.M. University of Illinois. The History of the Lake Shipping Trade of Chicago. Simon Litman, thesis supervisor.

1910-11. Women’s Educational and Industrial Union Fellowship at Radcliffe.

A fellowship of $500.00 established and maintained by the Massachusetts Federation of Women’s Clubs and the Women’s Educational and Industrial Union, 1905-1909, has been continued by the Women’s Educational and Industrial Union for the year 1910-11. This fellowship is offered to a graduate student who has been recommended by the Professors of Economics in Radcliffe College. The holder of the fellowship must devote one year to research under the Department of Research of the Women’s Educational and Industrial Union with a stipend of $500, and one year to graduate courses at Radcliffe College with the usual tuition fees as stated in the Radcliffe College catalogue; or she may devote one-half time to research work at the Union and one-half time to graduate courses at the College for two years, with a stipend of $300 per year. Applications for the year 1911-12 should be made before May 1, 1911, through the Dean of Radcliffe College.
The fellowship was awarded in 1905-07 to Caroline Manning (Carleton College) A.B. 1898, (Radcliffe) A.M. 1907; in 1907-08 to Grace Faulkner Ward (Smith) A.B. 1900; in 1908-10 to Edith Gertrude Reeves (University of South Dakota) A.B. 1906, (Radcliffe) A. B. 1907, A.M. 1910; in 1910-11 to Lorinda Perry (University of Illinois) A.B. 1909, A.M. 1910.
Source: Annual Reports of the President and Treasurer of Radcliffe College 1909-10, p. 66.

1911-13. Graduate Student at Bryn Mawr College. Fellow in the Department of Research, Women’s Educational and Industrial Union.

1913. Ph.D. Bryn Mawr. Millinery as a Trade for Women. New York: Longmans, Green, and Company. Susan Myra Kingsbury and Marion Parris Smith, dissertation supervisors.

[From the Preface, written by Susan M. Kingsbury, pp. viii-iv]

“In the fall of 1910, Miss Lorinda Perry, a graduate of the University of Illinois, 1909, securing a Master’s degree in 1910, and Miss Elizabeth Riedell, a graduate of Vassar College, 1904, were awarded Fellowships in the Department of Research of the Women’s Educational and Industrial Union and selected for investigation the subject of Millinery as a Trade for Women. During the year employers and employees were interviewed, and the results secured from the former were analyzed and interpreted by Miss Perry, from the latter by Miss Riedell.

In the years 1911 to 1913, Miss Perry held a Fellowship at Bryn Mawr College and under the direction of Dr. Marion Parris Smith, Associate Professor of Economics, continued the study of the millinery trade in Philadelphia. Miss Perry’s discussion of the trade in the two cities was accepted by Bryn Mawr College in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in May, 1913. In Philadelphia the field work was conducted by the Consumers’ League and at their expense under Miss Perry’s direct supervision. Fortunately the information on the trade in Boston was brought up to date by the courtesy of a number of Boston employers who permitted their entire pay rolls to be copied from their books by the secretaries of our Research Department. Tabulations of this data and retabulations of the earlier Boston material by our secretaries enabled Miss Perry to unify the two studies and to revise most of her earlier work and that prepared by Miss Riedell. Those sections dealing with the effect of seasons on Boston employees and on Boston workers in the trade as secured from personal interviews are therefore the combined work of the two students.

The method of attack, the range of inquiry and the extent of returns in the investigation are all presented in the introductory chapter. As this was one of the first studies of the type by the department and indeed in the country, the schedules were far from perfect resulting in an incompleteness which in later studies of the series has been avoided. It is to be regretted that the opportunity to use pay rolls came only within the last year so that detailed information as to wages was not obtained from the workers who were visited in their homes, as was done in the study of The Boot and Shoe Industry in Massachusetts as a Vocation for Women. It is also unfortunate that pay rolls could not be secured in Philadelphia.

Prepared for the purpose of affording students training in social investigation, the study must lack in finish of presentation and completeness of interpretation; but the work has been carefully supervised and supplemented by every means available to the Research Department. In order that the survey may serve as large a group as possible, the material is often presented in much greater detail and the tables arranged with much smaller class intervals than might at first appear necessary or desirable, although discussions in the text often deal with larger groupings. Indeed in many tables the facts are presented for each case, especially where subclassification has made the number considered too small for generalization. We hope that agencies interested in a study of minimum wage laws, in other regulation of working conditions by legislation, in vocational guidance and placement, in industrial education, and especially, in awakening the public conscience may each find here data which can be rearranged or grouped so as to form a basis upon which to act.”

1914-1916. Head of Department of Political and Social Sciences at Rockford College

1916. Dissertation published The Millinery in Boston and Philadelphia: A Study of Women in Industry. Binghamton,New York: Vail-Ballou.

1916-1920. Associate in Department of Household Science. University of Illinois.

DR . PERRY TO GIVE COURSE IN HOUSEHOLD ACCOUNTING

Dr . Lorinda Perry, associate in home economics, will have charge of a class in household accounting to be given under the auspices of the Home Improvement association of Champaign . The course will be open to members of the association only, but membership in the organization is open to any who wish to join. The object of the course is to teach the women how to place their homes on a business basis.

SourceDaily Illini, March 8, 1919, p. 5.

1917-1918. “Some Recent Magazine Articles on the Standard of Living,” Journal of Home Economics. Vol. 9 (December 1917), pp. 550-558. Concluding Part. Vol. 10 (January 1918), pp. 9-17.

1919. Taught in Chicago according to report in the Daily Illini, Nov. 22, 1919, p. 8.

1920. Appointed Associate Professor of Economics at Hunter College, New York City.

Ca. 1928. J.D. University of Chicago.

1926-27 Registration of Second Year Student, Lorinda Perry, Resident Autumn, Winter, Spring Quarters.
Source: University of Chicago, The Law School, 1927-28. In Announcements Vol. XXVII, no. 22 (May 10, 1927). p. 20.

1931. [Miss Lorinda Perry of Chicago] while in Melvin during the Thanksgiving season, learned that she had been successful in passing the state bar examination”. The Paxton Record (Illinois), Dec. 3, 1931, p. 10.

1940. U.S. census. Living with brothers and sisters, in Chicago Ward 5, University Ave. No occupation listed either for her or her older sister Josephine (who had twice been elected to the Legislature of Illinois from the Fifth district from 1930 to 1934).

1951. Died August 30th in Chicago, Illinois. Last residing at 6221 University Ave., Chicago.

 

Principal Source: Obituary in The Paxton Record (Illinois), September 6, 1951, p. 1.

Image Source: from the Holton/Kinney/Foster/Watson family tree posted at ancestry.com.