Categories
Chicago Cornell Economists Germany Harvard

Chicago. Economics Ph.D. alumnus, later Cornell professor, Newman Arnold Tolles, 1932

 

Tracking the careers of Ph.D. trained economists at Economics in the Rear-view Mirror has not been limited to the handful of tournament winning, prize economists of past times or even the prominent gatekeepers of orthodoxy. Our series “Meet an economics Ph.D. alumna/us” includes both those who have moved and shaken their local academic communities without leaving much of a footprint in the sands of the history of economics and those who have constituted the vast majority of economists who have survived the demands of the graduate economics programs of their times and then modestly contributed to the pool of our collective economic knowledge during the course of their professional careers.

Today’s economics Ph.D. alumnus, Newman Arnold Tolles (University of Chicago, 1932), achieved considerable professional success during his lifetime, though he is unlikely to ever be found in the syllabi of present and future histories of economics. Tolles is however worthy of nomination as one of a myriad poster-children representing mid-20th century U.S. economics. 

_______________________

Newman Arnold Tolles

Sept. 21, 1903. Born in New York City.

1923. B. Phil in economics, School of Commerce, University of Chicago.

1924. M.S.,University  of Chicago.

1925. Recent Literature on British Unemployment Insurance. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 39, No. 4 (Aug., 1925), pp. 651-662.

1926. A.M.,  Harvard.

1925-27. Study at the London School of Economics.

1929-35. Assistant Professor Mount Holyoke and part-time at Smith College in 1931-33.

1932, Autumn. Ph.D. U of Chicago (diss: Economic Aspects of Unemployment Insurance in Great Britain, 1911-31. Published Chicago: University of Chicago libraries, 1935).

1935-1945. Government service (1935-38 as economist with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1938-40 as assistant director and director of research in the US Dept of Labor’s new Wage-Hour Division., 1940-45 chief of the Working Conditions Branch at BLS).

(with Louis M. Solomon) Earnings in Eastern and Midwestern Airframe Plants, 1942 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 728.

(with Robert Julius Myers) Income From Wages and Salaries in the Postwar Period : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 845.

Spendable Earnings of Factory Workers, 1941-43 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 769.

(with Louis M. Solomon) Wage Rates in the California Airframe Industry, 1941 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 704.

(with Theodor Winter Reedy) Wage Stabilization in California Airframe Industry, 1943 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 746.

1945-47. Professor and chairman of the graduate department of economics, American University.

1947. appointed Professor at Cornell’s newly-established New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations to retirement July 1969.

1951. (with Earl Brooks and Richard F. Dean) Providing Facts and Figures for Collective Bargaining—The Controller’s Role. Ithaca: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.

1952. (with Robert L. Raimon) Sources of Wage Information: Employer Associations. Ithaca: Cornell Studies in Industrial and Labor Relations, no. 3.

1953-54. Fulbright guest professorship in Munich and Kiel.

1957. New York State Department of Labor. Chairman of the minimum wage board for the cleaning and dyeing industry.

1959. American Minimum Wage Laws: Their Purposes and Results. Ithaca: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations at Cornell University, no. 95.

1960. The Purposes and Results of U.S. Minimum Wage Laws. Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 83, No. 3 (March 1960), pp. 238-242.

1961. (assisted by Betti C. Goldwasser) Labor Costs and International Trade (Washington, D.C.: Committee for a National Trade Policy).

1964. Origins of Modern Wage Theories (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

1965 study of salaries of professional economists for the American Economic Association [published AER Vol. 58, No. 5, Dec. 1968, Supplement, Part 2. Studies of the Structure of Economists’ Salaries and Income.]

1966. Weathering Layoffs in a Small Community: Case Studies of Displaced Pottery and Carpet-Mill Workers. Washington, D.C.: Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1516.

1965-1969. Two terms as Ithaca city alderman as a Democrat.

1969. Lost race for mayor of Ithaca.

Two years after retirement part-time teaching at Cornell also teaching at State University College at Geneseo (economics department).

July 1971. Becomes emeritus professor at Cornell.

Apr. 10, 1973. Died from a heart attack while teaching his class at Geneseo State Teachers College.

Sources:

Cornell University Faculty Memorial Statement by Robert H. Ferguson, Vernon H. Jensen, Robert L. Aronson.

“Arnold Tolles Dead; Served County, City with ‘Compassion’”, The Ithaca Journal, April 11, 1973, p. 3.

Guide to the N. Arnold Tolles Papers. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives, Cornell University Library

Image Source: From Tolles’ obituary printed in The Ithaca Journal, April 11, 1973, p. 3.

_______________________

All the World’s a Stage
Tolles @ Center Stage

Photograph of a scene from the 1932 faculty show. Verso reads: A Scene from Faculty Show, presented once every four years at Mount Holyoke College by members of the Administration and Faculty. They present ‘A Hard Struggle’ by Westland Marston, Esq., as a curtainraisser. Left to right: Miss Ruth Douglass of the department of Music, Leslie Burgeivin of the department of English Literature, Miss Dorothy Graves of the department of Art; N. Arnold Tolles of the department of economics; Miss Elizabeth Doane of the department of French; and Bernard Bloch of the department of English.

Source:  https://compass.fivecolleges.edu/object/mtholyoke:24371

 

 

 

 

Categories
Economics Programs Harvard

Harvard. Galbraith’s Proposal to Split the Economics Department, 1973

 

During the early 1970s the Harvard economics department went through an identity crisis in which the orthodox mainstream was challenged by a not-so-silent minority of proto-heterodox economists and a dissatisfied graduate student body. The following three artifacts from the discussion of that time come from John Kenneth Galbraith’s papers. I would not exclude the possibility that some/much of the December 26, 1972 memo from the dean of the faculty of arts and sciences was inspired, if not directly penned, by Galbraith.

Galbraith was incapable of writing even an intrauniversity memo without flashes of wit as both the draft and final versions of his memo clearly demonstrate. And yet, there remains an overwhelming pathetic, quixotic note to his proposal of dividing the economics department in order to save its diverse, social elements.

____________________________

When the Dean Asks
How to Fix the Harvard Economics Department

December 26, 1972

From: THE DEAN OF THE FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES

To: THE CHAIRMAN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Re: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR A STUDY OF AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Recent developments and discussions suggest problems of some concern in the Department of Economics. In the belief that such problems, if attacked in timely fashion and a spirit of goodwill, will be more readily resolved than if allowed to persist and be aggravated, I am proposing action which I trust will meet with the approval of all concerned. I shall first identify those matters on which, I believe, there will be general agreement and then suggest terms of reference for the appropriate action.

  1. The Department of Economics has become very large. In the current catalogue I count 25 tenured members, 56 non-tenured members, 5 visiting professors and 13 economists in associated departments principally the Kennedy School, in addition to the large force of teaching assistants. It is not surprising that so large a body should have problems in maintaining a sense of common purpose and identity.
  2. There has of late been a deep difference of view on appointments in the Department. This has led to the suggestions that the Department, its size notwithstanding, is not emphasizing an adequate representation of diverse, socially unpopular or methodologically different positions, and that standards for promotion operate to exclude or minimize the representation of such views.
  3. There will be agreement that a majority may be less urgently seized of the need for representation of a minority view than the minority.
  4. In recent years there has been dissatisfaction among students, principally graduate students, with instruction in the Department. Again I state the fact without passing on the merits of the position. I do note that, historically, students have found satisfaction and pride in their association with the Department.
  5. The question has been raised whether some appointments are being appraised in accordance with contribution or non-contribution to or effect on corporate profit-making which, however useful and legitimate, is external to the scientific work and teaching of the Department.

In light of the foregoing I propose to ask the three past presidents of the American Economic Association together with the two American Nobel Prize winners who are engaged in active teaching (one of whom is also current President of the American Economic Association), together with the Chairman of the Department of Economics to examine the Department as a matter of urgency and to report. The following are the terms of reference for this examination:

  1. The group shall be denoted the Special Study Committee, and hereafter as the Committee.
  2. In its deliberations the Committee will consult to the fullest extent with students of the Department as well as with tenured and non-tenured members of the Department, and will discuss its provisional findings with students and faculty.
  3. The Committee will consider and report on whether the present personnel of the Department reflects an appropriately broad spectrum of method and view and, as necessary, on corrective steps. Corrective steps may specifically include recommendations for change in past action.
  4. The committee will consider whether the present teaching of economics is sufficiently broad, and specifically whether there should be a second and alternative track to a doctorate in economics embracing both course work and examinations and in which the primary emphasis would be on history of economic thought, institutional economics and socialist thought, or subject matter disciplines not required by the present framework.
  5. The Committee shall consider possible division or subdivision or other reorganization of the Department to provide greater knowledge of candidates for appointment or promotion, greater corporate responsibility for instruction and other possible gains from smaller size. In this connection special attention should be given to the relationship with the Kennedy School of Government.
  6. The effect of external corporate or other activities of Departmental members as these may bear on appointments, teaching or research, shall be examined with recommendations.
  7. The report of the Committee shall be made public and, in the absence of specific and fully-supported objection, it is my hope that its conclusions will be found acceptable to the Department. There is no intention to alter the constitutional arrangements by which tenured members, as now or in a suitably reorganized or subdivided Department, if that is the decision, are responsible for appointments and instruction.

____________________________

Galbraith Draft Statement (undated)
[handwritten additions in bold italics]

Draft #2

MEMORANDUM

MEMO:

The President
The Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences
Members of the Department of Economics

From: John Kenneth Galbraith

 

In these last weeks tensions long present in the Department of Economics at Harvard have come to the surface. The consequences are attracting interest and discussion well beyond the confines of the Department and the University. It is doubtful if anyone, and certainly any active participants, can state the issues with complete impartiality but some of the basic circumstances admit of agreement. They are.

(1) The Department has become very large—the current catalogue lists twenty-five regularly tenured professors, thirty-five nontenured professors, thirteen members in an adjunct relationship from other parts of the University and five visiting professors. In addition there are a large number of teaching assistants. The Department has become a parliamentary and not a corporate body. Long before the recent explosion I expressed my concern not only to my colleagues but also to the top management over our increasingly ungainly and ineffective mass and its dangers. I encountered little or no disagreement.

(2) The Department has for some years been deeply divided in its views. There has been an ineffective and mostly unchanging minority, and an effective and largely unchanging majority.

(3) While the basis of the division is diverse, including the polemical folk-tendencies of academic life, our learned delight in self assertion, our sensitivity to the intellectual shortcomings of others, differences in reaction to change, political attitudes, it is also a difference in the view of economics. I doubt that any statement of this difference can avoid prejudice. I shall content myself with being dull. It partly involves the acceptance or rejection of the established economic institutions; partly acceptance or rejection of accustomed preconceptions of economic thought, partly the trade-off between precision in established modalities and lesser precision in more innovative, critical or experimental work; partly it has to do with the degree of commitment to measurement and mathematics.

(4) While the underlying fact is a difference in the view of the subject (including the importance of representing the minority views) the argument over appointments invokes competence. Each side with no slight sense of moral righteousness defines competence in its own image. What is unscientific or soft to one side is irrelevant or unreal or unuseful to the other. Certainty in these positions is enhanced by the effect of professional esteem on ego. The members of the majority rightly reflect on the high regard in which precision and excellence of their work is held in their particular spheres of econometric, mathematical or applied work. The members of the minority rejoice similarly on their standing in the profession generally. Given these attitudes, the likelihood that one side will yield gracefully to the other is (if possible) even further reduced. Thus the absolute certainty of continued conflict.

(5) The difference comes to a head over appointments. This reflects a clear view of the reality. It is recognized by all that it is people who determine what is taught and investigated—and wholly so in such an unstructured environment as Harvard. The majority, not unnaturally, has prevailed. In this context a minority should not be expected to acquiesce. To do so is to accept eventual extinction. No one who is serious about his views or methods should countenance that.

(6) The students, once pridefully associated with the Department, are discontented. Their affiliation is largely, although by no means completely, with the minority. As a consequence some members of the majority hold or harbor the thought that the minority is acting less out of conviction than a desire to seek popularity or appease student opinion. Members of the minority react with a strong (and in my own case previously undisclosed) concern for the quality of our institution.

(7) There is a question as to the bearing of subjective judgments formed in connection with the business activities of members—or in consequence of those activities—on promotion of those whose disposition or work leads to criticism of cherished and remunerative economic institutions.

Aggravated problems sometimes allow of simple choices. This is so in the present case. One course is to continue as now, and enjoy the acrimony and continue to invite, by our public bickering, disesteem for the subject, the Department, the University, our students and ourselves. The other is to move to the obvious and forthright resolution, on which will be to the benefit of all concerned.

The solution is to divide the present vast Department into two parts. One part, a Department or Division of General Economics*, would reflect the specialized interests and scientific purpose of the majority, including those whose identification with the minority has been based not on identity of professional interest but concern for academic diversity. A second part would be the Department of Social Economics. This initially much smaller Department would consist of those tenured and untenured members whose active identification with the social issues of planning, economic structure, criticism, or socialism or institutionalism leads them to make the transfer. The new Department, born out of a need to ensure diversity, would itself be under the normal academic obligation to perpetuate diversity. It would develop an undergraduate and graduate curriculum and degree requirements compromising nothing in depth and rigor, in accordance with the interests of its members and of students. Subject to established ad hoc procedures—and its resources—it would make its own promotions and appointments.

*No difficulty should be made over a name. The parent Department could be called the Department of Economics.

The initial resources of the new Department would consist of the present financial commitment to those making the change. There would, some minor administrative costs apart, be no added burden on the University budget. I would make the transfer and make the revenues from the Paul M. Warburg Professorship, including the supporting research revenues (on neither of which I have drawn in net amount in recent years) available for a new professorial appointment. I believe, not without knowledge, that money for one or two added professorships as well as for research could be raised from sources not presently open either to the University or the Department. Scholarship funds would be divided in accordance with student demand. I am willing to commit a good share of personal time in the next year to money raising, a task in which, unlike my economics, my competence has been sufficiently established.

May I note in summary the advantages of the foregoing proposal.

(1) The basic cause of distress and conflict in the present Department of Economics would be removed. Each of the new Departments or Divisions will be in a position to develop the subject in full accordance with its own lights. Neither will be in the academically repellant position (however agreeable in practice) of imposing its standards or preferences on the other.

(2) The problem of excessive scale and consequent diminution in sense of communal responsibility for teaching, research and appointments is solved in the case of the new small Department or Division. It is alleviated for the larger parent Department.

(3) The Department of Social Economics if it is to attract, retain and place its graduate students, will have to demonstrate itself in competition with its older and more prestigious parent. This competition will be exceedinglyhealthy for both. This is an appealing point. While businessmen favor competition more often in principle than in practice, this is not an error into which any good economist will allow himself to fall.

(4) Undergraduate instruction in the new Department will benefit no alone from the members’ commitment to their subject matter but also from the greater sense of community as between teaching assistants, tenured and non-tenured faculty in a much smaller department and the present Department will be better. In the present Department not even all tenured and untenured members are known to each other. Teaching assistants are known only to a fraction of the faculty members and even less is known about their performance. And again in undergraduate teaching the vigorous competition of the new Department will be good for the older one.

(5) Problems associated with the corporate business activities of professors will be at least partly resolved. No question of concern for attitudes of business clients, however subjective, will be thought to influence those who are passing on appointments in the new Department. Subject no doubt, to appropriate safeguards the activities of present members of the Department with their potential for useful employment, income and information could perhapsremain.

(6) The two Departments through a coordinating committee might [illegible word] combine for the time being on the elementary course.

(7) The creation of the new Department with an admixture of old and new members intent on developing both old and new lines of inquiry will affirm, as nothing else, Harvard’s avidly proclaimed commitment to free inquiry by people of the highest calibre and to whatever result.

(8) Nothing is forever. If, after say ten years, there is demand for reunification, why not.

With so much to be gained—and also so much trouble to be avoided—I hope that we can proceed to consider this solution with a minimum of delay. Needless to say—perhaps on the basis of past departmental performance it is very necessary that I say—I am ready at any notice to lend a hand.

____________________________

Memo On Splitting the Harvard Economics Department
[Apparent Final Draft]

June 18, 1973

From:  JOHN KENNETH GALBRAITH

To:

PRESIDENT DEREK C. BOK
DEAN-DESIGNATE HENRY ROSOVSKY
PROFESSOR JAMES S. DUESENBERRY
MEMBERS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Re: THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

The Department of Economics is, I would judge, entering into a period of considerable calm and tranquility. The older dissidents and heretics in the Department will, with one or two exceptions, soon be retiring. And, in any case, they are now a harmless minority. Within a year or so the younger generation of dissidents will be safely gone. Thus the expectation of a period of scholarly calm.

My purpose in this memorandum is to suggest that the prospect is not as happy as these developments imply. And it is to suggest some steps which, without unduly disturbing the equanimity of the situation, the Department and the Administration would be wise to consider. May I note that these are matters on which I have no personal, as distinct from general, professional concern. I am one of those who will be contributing, however modestly, to a more seemly, tranquil and comfortable life by a comparatively early departure.

The problems remaining after the prospective changes are two. There is first the fact that, while faculty affairs have been generally arranged to the satisfaction of all, the students remain deeply dissatisfied. Let no one doubt this or seek, by the usual academic rationalizations, to explain it away. I was much exposed to this in the special seminar last autumn; I determined then to inform myself in a minor way during the spring, which I have done. The students, over a wide political spectrum, deeply dislike their work and the Department. This is especially true of the first-year students who, in a puzzling exercise in public relations reflecting an odd attitude toward education, are now blithely told at the outset to expect the worst year of their lives. Those who have been here two or three years also look back with discontent on their educational experience. My first year of graduate work was one of the most vital and interesting of my life. So, I believe it was with most of my generation.

The complaint of the students is straitforward. They are squeezed, especially in their first year but increasingly as a test in later work, into a narrow model-building, problem-solving, quasi-mathematical routine that they find boring and unrelated to the world in which they live. The emasculated careerist may accept the routine and do well. The student who thought that economics was a window on the problems of the world is abjectly disappointed.

These student reactions are heavily discounted by most although not all of the senior faculty. The rationalization is that such student attitudes are inevitable—that the modern student is inherently lazy, feckless, radical and dissatisfied. It is even suggested, not without scholarly vigor, that those who express concern about students are courting a student popularity in a sadly unscholarly tradition. As I say, this rationalization seems to me unwise and something that very soon will have a more practical consequence. A bad reputation in these matters is not easily kept a secret. It could happen that eventually the Department will have very few graduate students of indigenous origin of any consequence, a few committed careerists, mathematicians and model-builders apart. Numbers and quality of applicants will decline. In consequence, the ratio of faculty to active, teachable graduate students, which is now approaching one to one, will pass that point and will widen as a ratio of students to teachers. This is not hyperbole. A course was recently described to me by a graduate student in which he was the only participant along with three faculty members. We have a fair number of seminars with only a handful of students, sometimes but one. Faculty life will continue in comfort. Workshops will serve, as already now, to disguise the shortage of students. But still there will be nervousness.

There is another and more subjective danger. The harmony which one now foresees is based on a general commitment to neoclassical economics or its applied refinements. Accomplishment in model-building and refinement is, I think nearly all will agree, an increasingly stern requirement. We would not again hire a labor economist who, like Professor Dunlop or Professor Slichter, made his career out of a practical association with the unions and the problems of labor mediation. Professor Leontief, were he now showing the experimental tendencies that marked his early career, would be in trouble. Even his work, when firmly established, was not strongly supported. We would not have an economist who was too much preoccupied with the practical details of tax reform—unless he protected his flank by suitable theoretical or econometric exercise. My own past tendencies would certainly not be acceptable for promotion—although on the merits of this, with characteristic tact, I disqualify myself. What is not in doubt is that we are now very strong in the journals but much less strong in the obscenely practical matters on which many people, including many students, expect economists to be useful. This could be damaging to the reputation of the Department. The latter has always depended in appreciable measure not on the great scientists but on its vulgar practitioners.

Now let me say a word on reform. Mention of reform leads to thoughts of reform of the Department—so it is with faculty and also students. The present course of instruction is wrong. Let us find the right one. The problem is that no one line of graduate economic instruction can now serve all interests, reflect all points of view. Nor does it deal with the highly important fact that instruction is far less important than the inclination of the people who guide it. The Department is now a vast parliamentary body. So long as there is only one educational track, as a matter of course it will reflect the preferences of the majority. All of us, in the oldest of academic traditions, appraise excellence using ourselves as the yardstick. Reform requires that we begin to provide real choices as to teachers and as to work. Three possibilities occur to me:

  1. We should have in the Department of Economics two tracks to two Ph.D.’s. One of these would be in economics, another in (say) social economics. Professors in the Department would be grouped into two broad Executive Committees around these tracks. And each of these two Executive Committees would have responsibility not only for developing graduate work in its track and for examination therein but also for recruitment and promotion. This would broaden the choice for students; would mean that we would have two more nearly corporate bodies rather than one parliamentary body to guide instruction and appointments; would foster the kind of competition which all economists intrinsically and devoutly applaud; and would reduce by half the present parliamentary tendency to exclude the minority view. The first track would continue the present program with all of its neoclassical and model-building rigor. The second track would be experimental, humane and with a much stronger orientation to the emerging issues of our time. It would not, and this must be emphasized, involve any less effort.
  2. The second possibility would be to establish within the Department an institute—an Institute for Economic Innovation. This would enlist the members of the senior faculty so inclined, would develop a program purely of graduate instruction and would lead also to a degree which would reflect its own course of instruction. The purpose of constituting this as an institute would be twofold: to get the energy and attention of one man who would see the institute as the projection of his own efforts, and to use the institute as a device for raising new funds for both chairs and research. It is my near certainty, based on some experience as a medicant, that this enterprise, properly presented, would be very attractive to donors. I am not sure, however, that given the present size of the Department, it would not be wiser simply to allot some Graustein appointments to the Institute for the next few years.
  3. The third and final possibility would be to have two Departments of Economics—one Department of Economics and one Department of Social Economics. There are advantages to this—again the healthy competition in which all economists theoretically rejoice, elimination of the present diseconomies of scale, the much more clearly defined differentiation of purpose. It would not be as difficult a solution as seems at first glance. Those who approve of the Department as it is would remain with the Department of Economics. The rest would make the new Department. It would form its character from those who join it in the feeling that a more strongly innovative, humane and applied—in the modern sense—approach to economics is in order. The problem is, of course, that it involves the largest disruption in established institutional arrangements. That is not something to be undertaken lightly. Sometimes, though, that is good.

I am persuaded that in one or another of the above arrangements lies the only hope for a satisfactory future. For a while the tranquility that is in prospect will be greatly enjoyed. Given the sterile tendencies of the accepted economics and the attitudes of the students, it will be, if not the tranquility of the tomb, certainly that of a kind of somnambulant decay.

J.K.G.

Source: John F. Kennedy Presidential Library. John Kenneth Galbraith Personal Papers. Series 5. Harvard University File, 1949-1990. Box 526. Folder “Memorandum on Reorganization of the Department of Economics”.

Image Source: Harvard Class Album 1958.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Syllabus and Final Exam for Economic Development of China. Paauw, 1955

 

Douglas Seymour Paauw was a Harvard economics Ph.D. (1950) who taught courses on the economies of East Asia. Like many area specialists of his generation, he acquired his foreign language skills during his military service in World War II. He lived to the age of 98 and died in February, 2020. His Seattle Times obituary is followed by the syllabus, reading list and final examination for his 1955 course at Harvard on Chinese economic development.

      ___________________________

Earlier post on the Chinese Economy

Harvard. Readings for Chinese Economic Problems, 1947

           ___________________________

Obituary

Douglas S. Paauw was born December 13, 1921 in Hancock, MN and passed away peacefully at the age of 98 at home in Bellevue, WA on February 17, 2020. He grew up in Holland, MN and graduated from Pipestone High School in 1939. He received a BA degree from Calvin College in Michigan.

In 1948 he married Kaye Horan, daughter of long-time Congressman Walt Horan of Wenatchee, WA. This union produced two sons, Scott & Doug.

During World War II he served as a Chinese interpreter after receiving training in Chinese at Harvard University. Following his WWII service, he received a Master’s degree from the University of Washington (1949) and a PhD in economics from Harvard (1950).

He taught at Harvard until 1956, after which he taught at Lake Forest College (1956-1959), Nommensen University in Indonesia (1960-1961), Yale (1961-1963), University of the Philippines (1965-1967), and Wayne State University where he served as Chairman of the Department of Economics (1970-1987). He also served as Director of Research at the National Planning Association in Washington, D.C. for seven years.

Dr. Paauw became known as one of the world’s top experts on economic development in Southeast Asia. He worked in Indonesia, spending a total of ten years there after his first visit in 1954. He is the author of several books and many articles on Southeast Asian economic development.

Since retirement in 1990, he lived in Bellevue, WA. He was devoted to family, friends, his adopted country of Indonesia, and the game of tennis, which he actively played until age 90.

He is survived by his son and daughter-in-law, Doug and Kathy Paauw of Redmond, WA, three grandchildren Alan Paauw, Carly Paauw Jerome, and Cindy Paauw, and two great-grandchildren, Aurora Kilcer and Violet Jerome. He is predeceased by his wife of 65 years, Kaye Horan Paauw, and his son, Scott, who both passed away in 2014.

SourceSeattle Times, February 23, 2020.

___________________________

From the Calvin College Archives

Douglas Seymour Paauw was born in Stevens, Minnesota on December 13, 1921. He received his B.A. degree from Calvin College and his M.A., Ph.D. from Harvard University. Paauw married Helen Kathleen Horan on September 10, 1948. He worked as a developmental economist and worked with government planning associations. Paauw’s work allowed him and his family the unique opportunity to live in interesting locations like Indonesia and the Philippines. Paauw eventually moved to the United States and settled in Detroit, Michigan where he accepted the position of Chairman of the Economics Department at Wayne State University. Douglas Seymour Paauw reached the status of Professor Emeritus of Economics.

SourceArchival Record at Calvin College.

___________________________

Douglas Seymour Paauw
Harvard Economics Ph.D., 1950

Douglas Seymour Paauw, A.B. (Calvin Coll.) 1946, A.M. (Harvard Univ.) 1949.
Subject, Economics. Special Field, Public Finance. Thesis, “Chinese Public Finance during the Nanking Government Period.”

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College 1949-1950, p. 198.

___________________________

Course Enrollment

[Economics] 113a Economic Development in the Far East: China. Dr. Paauw, Half course. (S)

Total 16: 7 Graduates, 3 Seniors, 3 Juniors 2 Sophomores, 1 Radcliffe

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College 1954-55, p. 89.

___________________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics
Economics 113a

Tentative Lecture Subjects, Spring Term, 1954-1955

Introduction

  1. Introductory Lecture
  2. A Birdseye View of the History of the Chinese Economy

The Supply of Factors

  1. The Supply of Factors: Land
  2. The Supply of Factors: Population
  3. The Supply of Factors: Labor
  4. The Supply of Factors: Capital
  5. The Supply of Factors: Entrepreneurship

The Utilization of Factors

  1. The Size of the Chinese Economy
  2. The Use of Factors: Agriculture
  3. The Use of Factors: Industry
  4. The Use of Factors: Industry (Manchuria)

The Institutional Setting

  1. The Development of Financial Institutions
  2. The Development of Fiscal Institutions
  3. The Development of Other Institutions (Markets, etc.)

External Relationships

  1. Foreign Trade
  2. Foreign Investment

The Development of the Chinese Economy

  1. Early “Industrialization Efforts
  2. Kuomintang Planning
  3. Inflation, Disruption and Collapse, 1939-1949
  4. Communist Rehabilitation of the Economy
  5. Communist Agricultural Policy
  6. Communist Economic Planning
  7. The Financing of Recent Economic Development
  8. Assessment of Economic Growth

___________________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics
Economics 113a

Reading List, Spring Term, 1954-1955

Wittfogel, K. A., “Foundations and Stages of Chinese Economic History”, Zeitschrift für Socialforschung, 1935 (in English).

Allen, G. C., and Donnithorne, A. G., Western Enterprise in Far Eastern Economic Development, Chapter 15.

Rostow, W. W., et al., The Prospects for Communist China, Chapter 12.

Abramovitz, M., “Economics of Growth”, A Survey of Contemporary Economics, Vol. II (B. F. Haley, editor), pp. 132-182.

Bergsmarck, D. R., Economic Geography of Asia, Chapters 23, 24, 25 (to p. 523), 26.

Usher, A. P., “The Resource Requirements of an Industrial Economy”, Journal of Economic History, Supplement, VII, 1947, pp. 35-46.

Jaffe, A. J., “A Review of Censuses and Demographic Statistics of China”, Population Studies, Vol. I, No. 3, December 1947, pp. 308-337.

Ta Chen, Population in Modern China, Chapters 1 and 5.

Spengler, J. J., “The Population Obstacle to Economic Betterment”, Proceedings, American Economic Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, May 1951, pp. 343-358.

Levy, M. J., and Shih, K. H., The Rise of the Modern Chinese Business Class.

Allen, G. C., and Donnithorne, A. G., op. cit., Chapters 1 and 2.

Liu Ta-Chung, China’s National Income (emphasize Chapters 1, 2, and 5).

Ou Pao-San, “A New Estimate of China’s National Income”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 54, No. 6, December 1946, pp. 547-554.

Chang Pei-Kang, Agriculture and Industrialization, Chapters 2, 4, and 5.

Buck, J. L., Land Utilization in China, Chapter 1.

Chiu, A. K., “Agriculture”, Chapter in China (H. F. McNair, editor).

___________________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics
Economics 113a

Reading List, Spring Term, 1954-1955
Part II

Ou Pao-san and Wang Fo-shen, “Industrial Production and Employment in Pre-war China,” Economic Journal, Vol. 56, September 1946, pp. 426-434.

Hubbard, G. E., Eastern Industrialization and its Effect on the West, pp. 181-205, 222-228.

Schumpeter, E. B., The Industrialization of Japan and Manchukuo, pp. 376-418.

Chang, Kia-ngau, “China’s Need for Transport,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 3, April 1945, pp. 465-475.

Tamagna, F. M., Banking and Finance in China, Chapters 6 and 7, pp. 121-223.

Ting, L. G., “Chinese Modern Banks and the Finance of the Government and Industry,” Nankai Social and Economic Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 578-616.

Paauw, D. S., “Chinese National Expenditures in the Nanking Period,” Far Eastern Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 1, Nov. 1952, pp. 3-26.

Li Cho-ming, “International trade” in H. F. McNair, China, pp. 492-506.

Remer, C. F., Foreign Investments in China, Chapters 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.

Wu Yuan-li, “Communist China and Trade with the West,” Pacific Spectator, Vol. 7, No. 4 Autumn, 1953, pp. 404-418.

Fong, H.D., “Toward Economic Control in China,” Nankai Social and Economic Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 296-397.

Li Choh-ming, “Wartime Inflation in China,” Review of Economic Statistics, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 23-33.

Rostow, W. W. et al., The Prospects for Communist China, Ch. 13, pp. 237-255.

Paauw, D. S., “Economic Principles and State Organization,” Annals of the American Academy, Vol. 227, Sept. 1951, pp. 101-112.

Hsia, Ronald, Price Control in Communist China, Introduction, Chapters 1 through 8.

Chao, K. C., “Current Agrarian Reform Policies in Communist China,” Annals of the American Academy, Vol. 227, Sept. 1951, pp. 113-123.

Schwartz, B. I. and Paaw, D. S., “David Mitrany’s Marx Against the Peasant: Two Comments on its Implications for the Far East,” Far Eastern Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 1, Nov. 1952, pp. 47-50.

Barnett, A. D., “China’s Road to Collectivization,” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 35, No. 2, May, 1953, pp. 188-202.

Rostow, W. W., et al., The Prospects for Communist China, Ch. 14 and 15, pp. 256-295.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. Box 6, Folder “Economics, 1954-1955”.

___________________________

1954-55
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 113A
[Final examination. June, 1955]

  1. (2 hours) Answer two of the following:
    1. Prior to the Communist Period Chinese industrialization efforts were characterized by a series of stops and starts, backing and filling, advance and retrogression. Give the history of these efforts and the reasons for their failure to achieve the objectives of economic development.
    2. Given an analysis of the prospects for Chinese economic growth under the Communist growth model, including all relevant factors which you can draw from your study of the Chinese economy. The strengths or weaknesses of the models discussed in the course should be presented to support your conclusions.
    3. Outline the important changes which have taken place in the Chinese economy during the past 100 years, giving your analysis of the factors which precipitated these changes, their impact on general economic welfare and the structure of the economy and their implications for the rate and costs of economic progress.
  2. (1 hour) Discuss one of the following basing your discussion mainly on required course reading on the subject. You are expected to refer to the major sources supporting your discussion.
    1. Problems of developing “Westernized” business entrepreneurship in China.
    2. The growth and development of fiscal, monetary and banking institutions.
    3. Transition in the agricultural sector during the Communist period.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Papers Printed for Final Examinations [in] History, History of Religions, … , Economics, … , Naval Science, Air Science, June, 1955. Included in bound volume Final Exams, Social Sciences, June, 1955 (HUC 7000.28, Vol. 110).

Image Source: Harvard Square from the Tichnor Brothers Collection of postcards. Boston Public Library, Print Department.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Socialism Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Economics of Socialism, Syllabus and Final Exam. O.H. Taylor, 1953

Joseph Schumpeter’s shadow was still cast over “his” Economics of Socialism course that was taken over by Harvard’s historian of political-economy, O. H. Taylor. This post provides the syllabus and final exam for Taylor’s course as taught in the  second term of the 1952-53 academic year. The syllabus from the spring term of 1955 was posted earlier. 

_______________________

Course Announcement, 1952-53

Economics 111. Economics of Socialism.

Half-course (spring term). Mon., Wed., and (at the pleasure of the instructorFri., at 10. Dr. O. H. Taylor.

A brief survey of the development of socialist groups and parties; pure theory of centralist socialism; the economics of Marxism; applied problems.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Courses of Instruction, Box 6, Announcement of the Courses of Instruction Offered by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences for the Academic Year, 1952-53, p. 99.

_______________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Economics 111—Economics of Socialism
Spring Term, 1952-53

OUTLINE

  1. January 28-February 13: Socialist Thought Before Marx, and the Doctrines of Marx.

Reading:
1. H. Laidler, Social-Economic Movements, Chapters 8-16.
2. Burns, Handbook of Marxism, Chapter 1.
3. G. H. Sabine, History of Political Theory, Chapters on Hegel and Marx.
4. J. A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Part I.
5. P. M. Sweezy, Theory of Capitalist Development, Parts I and II.

Lectures:
Introduction. Pre-history of the socialist vision. Some “utopian” socialists. Hegel and Marx, philosophies of history. Marx’s economic interpretation of history. Ricardo and Marx, economic theories of production, class roles and incomes, value, and economic development.

Discussion: February 13.

  1. February 16-27: Marx, continued; and History of German and Other Continental European Socialism (Parties, Movements, and Ideas) to the First World War.

Reading:
1. P. M. Sweezy, Theory of Capitalist Development, Part II (continued).
2. Joan Robinson, Essay on Marxian Economics.
3. O. H. Taylor, “Schumpeter and Marx”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, November 1951.
4. H. Laidler, Social Movements, Chapters 19-23.

Lectures:
Marx’s economics (continued)—theory of capitalism’s (the economy’s) working, evolution, dilemmas, and degeneration, or life-cycle. Marx’s program—strategy and tactics—for the social movement, and ideas of the revolution and its sequel—stages of creation of the socialist society. Lasalle and Marx, and the German Social Democratic Party in the Age of Bismarck. Later history of the German party—Bernstein’s revisionism vs. Marxist orthodoxy. Other Continental European movements, parties, and ideas.

Discussion: February 27.

  1. March 2-13: Varieties of Socialist Thought and Effort, and the Labor Movement in England from 1815 to 1914.

Reading:
1. Max Beer, History of British Socialism, [Volume I] Part 2; [Volume II] 3, 4.
2. G. D. H. Cole, A Short History of the British Working Class Movement, Part I, Chapters 5-9; Parts II and III.
3. The Fabian Essays.

Lectures:

Early Nineteenth Century English radicalism and its varieties—Benthamism, Ricardian socialism (before Marx), Owenism, Chartism. The Christian socialists. Evolution of the trade unions. The Fabians and their philosophy and program. Other socialist societies and creeds. Formation and early history of the Labor Party and its program.

Discussion: March 13.

  1. March 16-27: The Internationals, the First World War, the Russian Revolution, Lenin, and Communism.

Reading:
1. H. Laidler, Social-Economic Movements, Chapters 24-27.
2. G. H. Sabine, History of Political Theory, Chapter “Communism”.
3. Burns, Handbook of Marxism, Chapters 22, 26, 29, 30.
4. P. M. Sweezy, Theory of Capitalist Development, Part IV.

Lectures:
The old socialist internationals; socialist internationalism and pacificism, the German and other parties, and the first World War. Czarist Russia, its radical parties, Lenin and the Bolsheviki, and the Russian Revolutions of 1917-18. Lenin’s policies and the early evolution of the Soviet regime; and Lenin’s theories, or “development” of Marxism. Theory of capitalism and imperialism. Modern Communist Marxism vs. democratic socialism.

Discussion: March 27.

Spring Recess

  1. April 6-17: Economic Theory and the Problems of Planning and Policy in a Socialist Economy.

Reading:
1. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Part IV.
2. Lange-Taylor, Economic Theory of Socialism.
3. M. Dobb, Soviet Economic Development since 1917, Chapters 1, 13.

Lectures:
“Rational economic decisions” in competitive capitalism and in a socialist society; historic, intellectual background and development of the study of this problem. The Lange model of a liberal, competitive-market socialism. Dobbs and others on problems neglected in the Lange model. Critical remarks on the whole discussion—doubts of relevance for socialism of the bourgeois aim at “rational economy.”

Discussion: April 17.

  1. April 20-29: Economic Policies in Soviet Russia, and in England Under the Last Labor Government.

Reading: [blank]

Lectures: [blank]

Discussion: April 29.

 

Source: Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. Box 5. Folder “Economics, 1952-53 (1 of 2)”.

____________________________

1952-53
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 111

[Final examination. May, 1953]

  1. Discuss the implications, and degrees of validity if any, of Marx’s description of the “socialisms”” of Fourier, Owen, etc. as “Utopian,” and of his own system as “scientific socialism.”
  2. Give a general account and discussion of one of the following “parts” of Marx’s system of thought:
    1. His general theory of the dynamics of all history: “materialism,” the dialectic, the economic interpretation of history, the class struggle theory.
    2. His theory of value and surplus value—or value, wages, and capitalist incomes—in the capitalist economy.
    3. His theory of the capital-accumulation process—its causes, motives, and results—and the dynamics, and predicted course, of the evolution of the capitalist economy.
  3. Describe and discuss the character, and some of the main elements or tenets, of Fabian socialist thought. (The reference is only to the original Fabian group, the Webbs, Shaw, etc.)
  4. “Throughout the histories of the German and English socialist movements, the German socialists have been hampered by their excessive burden of dogmatic theory, and the English, by their lack of theory.”
    Comment, in the light of what you know of the actual histories; giving brief accounts of particular episodes or developments—at least one in the history of the German and one in that of the English movement—which might be held to illustrate the statements, and discussing the question, whether and how far they do so.
  5. Choose and discuss one or more of the important theoretical problems to be “solved” in developing any sound, useful structure of economic theory, for use in socialist economic planning and the construction and operation of a socialist economy.
  6. On any one of the important, general topics considered in New Fabian Essays, describe (summarize) the views or opinions expressed therein, and discuss them critically.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives.  Final Exams—Social Sciences, June 1953 (HUC 7000.28, vol. 99).

Image Source: O.H. Taylor in Harvard College, Class Album 1952.

Categories
Economists Exam Questions Harvard Michigan Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Syllabus, reading assignments, final exam for “Economies of Tropical Africa”. Berg, 1961

 

Today’s post provides material from a regional economics course on economic development in “tropical Africa” by the newly minted Harvard Ph.D., Elliot Joseph Berg, from the Spring term of the 1960-61 academic year. Biographical and career information is provided, followed by the transcription of the course syllabus and final examination.

According to a story about African Studies in the Harvard Crimson (“Harvard Expands Africa Studies with Courses in History, Anthropology”, October 3, 1961), 

“Last year [1960-61] the University offered its first two courses on Africa–one in Government, the other in Economics.”

__________________________

 

Elliot Joseph Berg’s best known publication:

Report of the African Strategy Review Group coordinated by Elliot Berg. Accelerated Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Agenda for Action. The World Bank, 1981.

Finding aid to Elliot Berg Papers on African Development. (MSS 308 large) Michigan State University Libraries.

__________________________

Life and Career

Elliot Joseph Berg
(b. 20 May 1927 in New York City;
d. 21 November 2002 in Alexandria, VA).

Education:

B.A., New York University, 1949
M.A., Columbia University, 1955
Ph.D., Harvard University, 1960.

Teaching Fellow, Assistant Professor of Economics, Harvard University 1959-1964.

Project Director, Harvard Advisory Group, Liberia, 1964-1966.

Awarded Grand Commander Order Star of Africa by the Government of Liberia, 1965.

Professor of Economics, Director of the Center Economic Development, University of Michigan, 1966-1983

1982-1991: President, Elliot Berg Associates. Alexandria, VI.

Adjunct Professor, Universite de l’Auvergne, Clermont, France, 1982-2000

Vice President, Development Alternatives Incorporated, Bethesda, MD, 1990-1995.

Source:   Prabook webpage for Elliot Joseph Berg.

__________________________

Course Enrollment

[Economics] 118. The Economy of Tropical Africa. Dr. E.J. Berg. Half course. (S)

Total 37: 3 Graduates, 13 Seniors, 6 Juniors, 10 Sophomores, 2 Radcliffe, 3 Other Graduates.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1960-1961, p. 76.

__________________________

Syllabus and Readings

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

Outline
Economics 118
THE ECONOMIES OF TROPICAL AFRICA

 

  1. The Pattern of Development
    1. The Pre-Colonial Background
    2. Peoples and Cultures: The Colonial Ideology
    3. The expansion of the Money Economy: Measures of Rates of Growth
    4. Types of Economic Growth: The Mining and Settler Economies and the Peasant-Producer Economies
    5. Development of a Labor Force
    6. The Role of the Non-African: Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation
  2. Structural Characteristics of African Economies
    1. Population Patterns
    2. The Extent of the Money Economy and the Concept of Dualism
    3. African National Accounts
    4. Export-Orientation and the Terms of Trade
    5. Goods Markets and Price Determination
    6. Labor Markets and Wage Determination
  3. Problems of Economic Policy and the Strategy of Development
    1. The Expansion of Agricultural Output
    2. Internal Trade Policies and Marketing Boards
    3. Transportation and Development
    4. The High-Level Manpower Problem and the Economics of Education
    5. Wage and Labor Policy
    6. Monetary Policy
    7. Tax Policy and Problems of Public Finance
    8. Accelerated Industrialization
    9. Development Planning
    10. The Role of the State: The Socialist Solution in Africa
  4. The Economics of Independence
    1. Economic Viability, Economic Development and the Size of States
    2. Uneven Growth and the Economic of Federalism
    3. External Economic Assistance
    4. Africa and the European Common Market
    5. Problems of African Economic Integration
    6. The Economic Prospects for Africa

*   *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

*Indicates substitutable readings

  1. The Pattern of Development

*Pim, Sir Alan, The Financial and Economic History of the African Tropical Territories. (Oxford, 1940).

*Knowles, L., The Economic Development of the Overseas Empire, (London, 1924), Vol. I, pp. 113-301; 485-508.

Stamp, L.D., Africa—A Study in Tropical Development (New York, 1953) Ch. 2.

Kimble, G. H. T., Tropical Africa (New York, 1960), Ch. 1.

Hancock, W. K., Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs, Vol. II, Problems of Economic Policy, 1918-1939, Part 2 (London, 1942).

Buell, R. L., The Native Problem in Africa (New York, 1928), Ch. 21, 29, 82, 83, 87, 89.

Myint, H., “The Classical Theory of International Trade and the Underdeveloped Countries,” Economic Journal, June 1958, pp. 317-337.

Singer, H., “The Distribution of Gains Between Investing and Borrowing Countries,” American Economic Review, May 1950, Papers and Proceedings, pp. 473-485.

United Nations, Bureau of Economic Affairs, Enlargement of the Exchange Economy in Tropical Africa (New York, 1954).

Hailey, Lord, An African Survey (London, 1957), pp. 1263-1306.

Bauer, P. T., Economic Analysis and Policy in Underdeveloped Countries, Ch. 2.

  1. Structural Characteristics of African Economics
    1. General

United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs, Review of Economic Conditions in Africa. Supplement to World Economic Report, 1949-50 (New York, 1951). Ch. 1.

United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs, Scope and Structure of Money Economies in Tropical Africa. (New York, 1955).

    1. The Dual Economy and the Supply of Effort

United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs, Enlargement of the Exchange Economy in Tropical Africa.

B. Higgins, Economic Development (New York, 1959), Ch. 12, pp. 274-293.

A. I. Richards, Land, Labour and Diet in Northern Rhodesia (OUP, 1939), pp. 201-227.

P. T. Bauer and B. Yamey, The Economics of Underdeveloped Countries (Cambridge, 1957), Ch. VII.

W. O Jones, “Economic Man in Africa,” Food Research Institute Studies (Stanford), Vol. I, #2, May 1960, pp. 107-134.

    1. Population Patterns

G. T. Kimble, Tropical Africa, Vol. I, Ch. 3, pp. 81-124.

A. Hirschman, The Strategy of Economic Development (New Haven, 1958) pp. 176-182.

East Africa Royal Commission (1953-1955) Report (London, H.M.S.O., 1956. Cmd 9475), Ch. 3, pp. 30-40; Appendix VII, pp. 462-473.

    1. National Income

D. Seers, “The Role of National Income Estimates in the Statistical Policy of an Underdeveloped Area,” in Review of Economic Studies, Vol. XX (1952-3), pp..159-68.

A. R. Prest, The Investigation of National Income in British Tropical Dependencies. University of London, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, Commonwealth Papers, No. IV., (London, 1957).

Phyllis Deane, Colonial Social Accounting (Cambridge, 1953) pp. 223-229.

    1. Export-Orientation and the Terms of Trade

Singer, “The Distribution of Gains…(article cited in Part I.)

Higgins, Economic Development, Ch. 15 (omit pp. 374-382).

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Economic Survey of Africa Since 1950, Ch. 3.

G. Haberler, International Trade and Economic Development (Cairo, 1959), pp. 1-24.

    1. Consumer Goods Markets, Price Determination and the Mechanics of Inflation

Gold Coast, Ministry of Finance, A Survey of Some Economic Matters (Accra, 1952), pp. 12-17.

D. Seers and C. R. Ross, Report on Financial and Physical Problems of Development in the Gold Coast(Accra, 1952), pp. 1-72.

P. T. Bauer, West African Trade (Cambridge, 1954), pp. 7-64; 104-144; 156-171; 379-392.

F. Bezy, Problemes Structurels de l’Economie Congolaise (Louvain, 1957), pp. 86-94.

East Africa Royal Commission Report, pp. 64-76.

M. Perham, (ed.), Mining, Commerce & Finance in Nigeria, (London, 1948), pp. 195-202; 218-224 (“Balance of Payments and the Three Sectional Price Levels”).

F. C. Wright, African Consumers in Nyasaland and Tanganyika. An Enquiry into the Distribution and Consumption of Commodities Among Africans Carried Out in 1952-1953. Colonial Research Studies #17 (London, 1955).

W. V. Berelsford, Copperbelt Markets. A Social and Economic Study (Lusaka, 1947), pp. 7-12; 21-41.

M. Capet, Les Economies de l’AOF (Paris, 1958), pp. [no pages given]

    1. Labor Markets, The Migrant Labor System and Wage Determination

International Labour Office, African Labour Survey (Geneva, 1959), pp. 106-120; 127-169; 259-294.

Bezy, Problemes Structurels de l’Economie Congolaise, pp. 101-197.

Sheila Van der Horst, Native Labour in South Africa (London, 1942) pp. [no pages given]

E. A. Royal Commission Report, pp. 146-172.

E. Berg, “French West Africa,” in W. Galenson, ed., Labor and Economic Development (New York, 1959), pp. 193-204.

J. C. Mitchell, “The Causes of Labour Migration,” in Bulletin of the Inter-African Labour Institute, Jan. 1959, pp. 12-45.

W. Elkan, “Migrant Labor in Africa: An Economist’s Approach,” in American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. XLIX, #2, (May 1959), pp. 188-197.

B. Gussman, “Industrial Efficiency and the Urban African: A Study of Conditions in Southern Rhodesia,” in Africa, Vol. XXIII, #2 (April 1953), pp. 135-144.

W. Watson, Tribal Cohesion in a Money Economy: A Study of the Mambwe People of Northern Rhodesia(Manchester, 1958), Ch. 3-5.

  1. & IV. The Strategy of Development and the Economics of Independence
    1. The Expansion of Agriculture

Food and Agricultural Organization, The State of Food and Agriculture, 1958 (Rome, 1959), Part III, pp. 90-162.

S. H. Frankel, “The Kongwa Experiment: Lessons of the East African Groundnut Scheme,” in The Economic Impact on Under-Developed Societies, (Cambridge, Mass., 1953), pp. 141-153.

K.D.S. Baldwin, The Niger Agricultural Project (Oxford, 1957) pp. 1-7, 81-125; 172-197.

Kimble, Tropical Africa, Vol. I, Ch. 5, pp. 163-193.

E. Africa Royal Commission Report, Part V.

    1. Marketing Boards

P. T. Bauer, West African Trade, pp. 263-343.

    1. Wage and Labor Policy

International Labour Office, African Labour Survey (Geneva, 1958), pp. 259-294.

Inter-African Labour Institute, Commission for Technical Co-operation in Africa South of the Sahara, The Human Factors of Productivity in Africa: A Preliminary Survey, pp. 1-55; 103-106.

Federation of Nigeria, Report of the Fact-Finding Committee on the Minimum Wage Question, (Lagos, 1955), mimeo’d, pp. 10-25.

E. A. Royal Commission Report, pp. 146-162.

E. Berg, “French West Africa,” in W. Galenson (ed.), Labor and Economic Development, pp. 223-241.

    1. High Level Manpower and the Economics of Education

Federal Ministry of Education, Nigeria. Investment in education; The Report of the Commission on Post-School Certificate and Higher Education in Nigeria. (The Ashby Report.) (Lagos, 1960).

    1. Industrialization

United Nations, Economic Survey of Africa Since 1950, pp. 134-140.

W. A. Lewis, Report on Industrialization and the Gold Coast (Accra, 1952).

    1. Development Plans and Finance

W.A. Lewis, “On Assessing a Development Plan.”

United Nations, Economic Survey of Africa Since 1950, pp. 135-47.

“The Finance of Development in Tropical Africa,” in United Africa Company, Statistical and Economic Review, #20 (September 1957), and #21 (March 1958).

    1. Integration and the Economics of Federalism

E. Berg, “The Economic Basis of Political Choice in French West Africa,” in American Political Science Review, Vol. LIV, #2 (June, 1960), pp. 391-405.

East Africa, Report of the Fiscal Commission (The Raisman Report).

C. Legum, A New Deal in Central Africa. (“The Economic Argument”).

[No additional reading assignment was given for the Reading Period]

Source:  Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. Box 7, Folder “Economics 1960-61, (1 of 2)”.

__________________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

Economics 118
FINAL EXAMINATION
May 29, 1961

Dr. Elliot Berg

INSTRUCTIONS: Answer both questions in Part I, and any three questions in Part II. Organize your answers and write clearly.

Part I. Answer both Questions

  1. (45 minutes). An African economist recently made the following statement:
    “The pattern of economic development imposed by the European powers in Africa has been a disaster for Africa. What benefits have we drawn from the European presence? Our people have been exploited, our raw materials drained, our economies tied to specialized products which face a dismal future on world markets. The economic benefits of the colonial experience have accrued to the metropolitan countries.”
    Do you agree? Discuss.
  2. (45 minutes). You are an eminent economist, deputized by a committee of African governments to make recommendations regarding the re-grouping of existing African states into the most “rational” conceivable economic units. If economic considerations alone were decisive, how would you re-draw the African map?
    In your answer you may focus on any one region (i.e., West Africa, East Africa, etc.) or you may discuss the problem more generally. Make clear the theoretical considerations, on which you base your recommendations—e.g., if you think larger states are more conducive to economic growth than smaller ones, give the analysis supporting your position.

 

Part II. Answer any three questions

(30 minutes)

  1. “In the development planning of most African countries, agricultural expansion should receive first attention, for agriculture is the essential springboard on which all economic growth depends.”
    Do you agree? Discuss, giving some attention to the problems of agricultural development, and to alternative methods of agricultural development in Africa.

(30 minutes)

  1. Some economics argue that because of the migrant labor system in Africa wage levels for unskilled African labor are higher than they would otherwise be. On the other hand, Adam Smith wrote, in The Wealth of Nations: “When a person derives his subsistence from one employment, which does not occupy the greater part of his time, in the intervals of leisure he is often willing to work for another for less wages than would otherwise suit the nature of the employment.”
    Are these arguments incompatible? Analyze the effects of labor migration on the level of wages of unskilled African labor.

 

(30 minutes)

  1. Discuss the major problems of national income accounting in African countries.

 

(30 minutes)

  1. African economies are commonly described as “fragile.” In what sense, and to what extent, is this an accurate description? Do you believe that African economies are more susceptible to domestic inflation than are advanced industrial economies?

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Bound volume: Social Sciences, Final Examinations. June, 1961. (HUC 7000.28, vol. 134). Papers Printed for Final Examinations [in] History, History of Religions, … , Economics, … , Naval Science, Air Science.

Image Source:  Screen shot of Elliot Berg, President of Elliot Berg Associates, Inc. from C-SPAN, International Conference on Privatization hosted by the Sequoia Institute(February 17, 1986).

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading

Harvard. Final exam for Economic Trends and Fluctuations. Haberler, 1932.

 

Gottfried Haberler taught two courses as a visiting lecturer at Harvard in 1931-32. His mid-year exam for Economics 15 Problems in Economic Theory was transcribed and posted earlier.

I have not (yet) found a syllabus for his one-semester business cycle course, but judging from the titles assigned for the reading period, he was clearly serving a Viennese melange of business cycle theories. 

___________________

Course Enrollment

Primarily for Graduates:—

III. Applied Economics

[Economics] 37 1hf. Dr. Haberler.Economic Trends and Fluctuations.

Total 7: Graduates 7.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1931-1932, p. 72.

___________________

Reading Period
Jan 4-20, 1932

Economics 37.

Schumpeter, J.: The Explanation of the Business Cycle, in “Economica”, Vol. 7, 1927.

Hayek, F.A.: Prices and Production, London, 1931.

Robertson, D.H.: Banking Policy and the Price Level.

Suggestions for further reading:

Hayek, F.A.: Geldtheorie u. Konjunkturtheorie, Vienna, 1929. [1932 translation by N. Kaldor and H.M. Croome]

Mises, L.: Theorie des Geldes u. der Umlaufmittel, Pt. III, Ch. 5, “Geld, Umlaufmittel u. Zins”.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in economics, 1895-2003. Box 2. Folder: “Economics, 1931-32”.

___________________

1931-32
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 37

Students may use any books or notes they wish.

Answer FIVE of these six questions.

  1. The relation of the rate of interest and prices according to (a) Irving Fisher, (b) Knut Wicksell, and (c) R. G. Hawtrey. State whether these different views are compatible with each other in your opinion.
  2. What is the influence of a credit expansion on the structure of production?
  3. Criticize the “monetary” theory of the business cycle as developed by R. G. Hawtrey.
  4. A. Hayek and J. Schumpeter have the notion that the upward swing of the business cycle is characterized by an increase of the “roundaboutness” of production. What is the difference between their theories and why do they reach different conclusions as to the essence of depression?
  5. What is the difference between D. H. Robertson’s and F. A. Hayek’s theory of the business cycle?
  6. It is frequently said that an individual can use up his capital, but that this is impossible—excepting physical destruction by a war or an earthquake—for a closed economy because, if one person sells a piece of his capital equipment, it necessarily accrues to somebody else. What do you think of this?

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Mid-year examinations, 1852-1943. Box 12, Bound volume: Examination Papers, Mid-years, 1931-32.

Image Source: Link to Österreichische Nationalbibliothek record.

 

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard History of Economics

Harvard. Exams for History of Economics up through 18th Century. Ashley, 1900.

 

The economic historian William James Ashley was also a historian of economics. As this Harvard course name and its semester exams transcribed for this post indicate, Ashley covered a huge chunk of waterfront–from Plato’s Republic through Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. Students were clearly expected to bring a solid reading knowledge of German and French to the course (Latin was probably covered in the entrance exams of the time). Notes and links have been added between square brackets.

___________________

Course Enrollment

Primarily for Graduates:

[Economics] 15. Professor Ashley. — The History and Literature of Economics to the close of the Eighteenth Century. Lectures (2 or 3 hours).

Total 11: 6 Graduates, 2 Seniors, 2 Juniors, 1 Sophomore.

Source: Harvard University. Annual Report of the President of Harvard College, 1899-1900, p. 69.

___________________

1899-1900
ECONOMICS 15
[Mid-year Examination]

Not more than eight questions should be attempted, of which the first must be one.

  1. Explain the significance and context of the following passages:
    1. “If you were making a city of pigs, this is the way you would feed them.”
      [Plato, The Republic, Book II]
    2. “If a child be born in their class with an alloy of copper or iron, they are to have no manner of pity upon it.”
      [Plato, The Republic, Book III]
    3. “Each of them is very many cities, – in any case there are two.”
      [Plato, The Republic, Book IV]
    4. “A slave is an animate instrument.”
      [Aristotle. The Politics. Book I, Chapter IV.]
    5. “Every article admits of two uses.”
      [Aristotle. The Politics. Book I, Chapter IX.]
    6. Mutuum date, nihil inde sperantes.”

[“Lend hoping nothing thereby.” Luke 6:35. Originally from the Vulgate, Latin version of the Bible prepared mainly by St. Jerome in the late 4th century.
35 verumtamen diligite inimicos vestros et benefacite et mutuum date nihil inde sperantes et erit merces vestra multa et eritis filii Altissimi quia ipse benignus est super ingratos et malos”
35 But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked.”]
cf. Aquinas’ Summa Theologica. Second Division of the Second Part of Question LXXVIII. Of the Sin of Usury That is Committed in Loans.
Also, Théodore Reinach, Mutuum date nihil inde sperantes. Revue des Ètudes Grecques, 1849, pp. 52-48.]

  1. Compare Plato’s conception of the division of labor with that of Adam Smith.
  2. Explain and illustrate the attitude of Aristotle towards the working classes.
  3. It has been remarked that after all Aristotle’s ideal polity is half communistic.
    Criticize this opinion.
  4. Describe the economic organization of the Spartan state. What do you gather from Plato and Aristotle as to the effects of the system?
  5. In one sense, if at all, can the early Christian Church be called communistic? Set forth briefly the nature of the evidence.
  6. Explain what you suppose to be the doctrine of Aquinas as to just price, and then consider whether the idea is in any way practically applicable under modern circumstances.
    [From the Second Division of the Second Part of Summa Theologica. Question LXXVII. Of Fraudulent Dealing in Buying and Selling.]
  7. Wherein did the medieval contract of partnership approach and wherein did it differ from usury?
  8. Distinguish between the various senses attached to the word “Mercantilism”.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Mid-year examinations, 1852-1943. Box 5, Bound volume: Examination Papers, Mid-Years, 1899-1900.

 ___________________

[1899-1900]
ECONOMICS 15
[End-year Examination]

Not more than eight questions should be attempted.

  1. Distinguish between the several lines of thought concerning the causes determining Value to be found in the various writings of John Locke.
  2. The place in economic literature of either Sir Josiah Child or Sir William Petty.
  3. Estimate the influence upon Adam Smith of the economic writings of Hume.
  4. “Es lässt sich ja auch nicht leugnen, dass gerade das Beste an der physiocratischen Theorie: die Darstellung des Wirtschaftlichen Kreislaufs, die Lehre von der Reproduktion der Urstoffe, ihre Formung, Cirkulation und Verteilung, die Berechnung des Kapitalzinses, welchen die Pächter haben muss, und anderes auf einer Beobachtung des wirtschaftlichen Lebens beruhte; kurz sich als eine Beschreibung der französischen Wirtschaft des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts darstellte.”—Hasbach. Translate and comment.
    [Wilhelm Hasbach. Die allgemeinen philosophischen grundlagen der von François Quesnay und Adam Smith begründeten politischen ökonomie, 1890, p. 138]
  5. “La division du travail rend de si grands et si évidents services qu’on les a remarqués dès l’antiquité….Mais personne n’en a tiré parti au point de vue économique avant Adam Smith; aussi le considère-t-on en quelque sort comme l’inventeur de la division du travail.” — Block. Translate and comment.
    [Maurice Block, Les Progrès de la Science Économique depuis Adam Smith. Tome Premier, Chapitre XVII, La Division du Travail, p. 433.]
  6. A rapid sketch of the literary history of the doctrine of the Balance of Trade.
  7. “The Component Parts of Price.” The significance of the phrase.
  8. Compare Adam Smith’s doctrine of Wages with that of Ricardo.
  9. State and criticise Adam Smith’s Canons of Taxation.
  10. “Un autre progrès doctrinal réalisé depuis Ad. Smith…c’est la part faite aux entrepreneurs.” Translate and comment.
    [Maurice Block, Les Progrès de la Science Économique depuis Adam Smith. Revue des Deux Mondes (1890, Vol. 97), p. 940.]
  11. The Historical School: its merits and defects.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Examination Papers, 1873-1915. Box 5, Bound volume: Examination Papers, 1900-01, p. 38.

Image Source: Portrait of W. J. Ashley incluced in University and their Sons. History, Influence and Characteristics of American Universities with Biographical Sketches and Portraits of Alumni and Recipients of Honorary Degrees. Editor-in-chief, General Joshua L. Chamberlain, LL.D. Vol II (1899), p. 595.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard

Harvard. Mid-year exams for Money, Banking and Commercial Crises. Young, 1921-1927

 

Allyn A. Young taught the course “Money, Banking, and Commercial Crises” from 1920/21 through 1926/27. The final exams from the second semester of the course have been posted earlier. Unfortunately, I probably have overlooked the volumes in the Harvard archives containing the first semester, i.e. mid-year, exams for 1920/21, 1923/24, and 1925/26. Hopefully, I find those exams during my next visit to the Harvard archives. Until then we at least have four of the mid-year exams included in Economics in the Rear-view Mirror.

________________________

Course Description, 1924-25

[Economics] 3. Money, Banking, and Commercial Crises. Mon., Wed., Fri., at 2. Professor Young.

In this course money and credit will be studied with special reference to the part they play in the present economic system. The principal problems of public policy with respect to the control of money and banking will be discussed. Foreign exchange, organized speculation in its relation to the money market, and the characteristic phenomena of commercial crises will be considered in some detail. The course will be conducted by means of lectures, discussions, frequent short reports or exercises on assigned topics, and (in the second half-year) a thesis based on work in the library. Certain subjects, such as the monetary and banking history of the United States, will be covered almost wholly by assigned reading, tested by written papers.

Source:  Division of History, Government and Economics 1924-25 published in Official Register of Harvard University, Vol. 21, No. 22 (April 30, 1924), p. 67.

__________________________

1920-21
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 3
[Mid-year Examination, 1921]

[not (yet) recovered]

__________________________

1921-22
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 3
[Mid-year Examination, 1922]

  1. What do you understand the “rationalistic series” of the origin of money to be? What other account of the origin of money can you give?
  2. Put the argument for bimetallism into what seems to you the strongest possible form.
  3. For how many years has gold been the monetary standard of the United States? Since 1900? 1879? 1873? 1834? What significance of this connection has each of these dates?
  4. Define the following terms, taken from American or foreign bank statements. Try to be both succinct and accurate in your definitions.
    Deposits, surplus, loans and discounts, reserve, account-current, government debt.
  5. What was the problem with which the Bullion Report dealt? What were its conclusions? And the Bank Act of 1844?
  6. Describe the functions of (a) joint-stock banks, (b) bill brokers, (c) acceptance houses, in the London money market.
  7. In what different ways are clearing-house balances settled? Do all of these methods accomplish the same purpose? What is that purpose?
  8. A writer, quoted by Phillips, holds with respect to the national banking system that “if all other circumstances remained the same, circulation grew less profitable as the current money rate advanced.” On what reasoning is this conclusion based? What is your opinion?
  9. What, in general, is the effect of speculation on price fluctuations? What evidence can you cite? Does short-selling tend to depress prices? Explain.
  10. Explain the effects of rising prices upon (a) profits, (b) interest, (c) wages, (d) long-period debts and credits, (e) industrial enterprise.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Mid-year examinations, 1852-1943, Box 10. (Bound volume) Examination Papers, Mid-Years 1920-22.

__________________________

1922-23
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 3
[Mid-year Examination, 1923]

  1. Explain the purposes and the provisions of (a) the Sherman Act and (b) the Pittman Act.
  2. In what respect is the case for international bimetallism stronger than the case for national bimetallism?
  3. Describe briefly the effects changes in the purchasing power of money have upon the welfare of (a) creditors, (b) debtors, (c) business man, (d) capitalists, (e) landowners, (f) wage-earners.
  4. “The absence of centralized responsibility for the maintenance of surplus reserves was the chief defect of the old national banking system.”
    Explain.
  5. Contrast the pre-war policy of the Bank of France with respect to its discount rate with that of the Bank of England.
  6. “Scotch banking is so generally regarded as one of the highest achievements of the banking intelligence that some hesitation is natural criticising the system by which, according to its own evidence, it has obtained most of its success. At the same time, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that a serious danger lurks in the system which regards a banker’s unissued promise to pay in the light of a banking asset.”– Hartley Withers.
    What is the practice which Mr. Withers deems a danger? Do you agree with him?
  7. “Two powerful forces are constantly at work, one putting notes into circulation, the other retiring them, and the people of Canada always have on hand just the amount of currency they need and no more. It is the people, not the banks, who determine how much the circulation of the banks shall be.”–J. F. Johnson.
    What are the “two powerful forces”?
  8. “The close relation of the so-called regular banking business to that of the floating of enterprises, the trading in and the issue of shares is typical of the organization of the German credit-bank system….There is no doubt that for their policy of furthering the industries, the economic development of Germany would have taken considerably longer than has been the case.”–Robert Franz.
    Discuss this topic with special reference to (a) the soundness or unsoundness of the joining of commercial and investment banking and (b) the judgment expressed by the writer with respect to the effect of the policy of German banks upon the economic progress of Germany.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Mid-year examinations, 1852-1943, Box 10. (Bound volume) Examination Papers, Mid-Years 1922-24.

__________________________

1923-24
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 3
[Mid-year Examination, 1924]

[not (yet) recovered]

__________________________

1924-25
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 3
[Mid-year Examination, 1925]

Answer 8 questions

  1. In what respects is the case for international bimetallism stronger than the case for national bimetallism?
  2. Disregarding legal stipulations, what assets might an individual bank properly regard as constituting its reserve? What assets might the banks of the United States, taken together, regard as their reserves?
  3. Professor Taussig, in discussing Professor Fisher’s equation of exchange, said: “In the end, an increase of deposits finds its limits in the volume of cash held by the banks. But there is some elasticity of adjustment, by which loans and discounts increase as fast as transactions or faster; and this accounts in no small degree for the rise in prices during periods of activity.”
    Discuss.
  4. In what different ways are clearing house balances settled? Why is so much importance attached to the matter?
  5. “The close relation of the so-called regular banking business to that of the floating of enterprises, the trading in and the issue of shares, is typical of the organization of the German credit-bank system.” Explain.
  6. With what problem did the “Bullion Report” deal, and what were the doctrines of its supporters?
  7. What was the issue between the “currency school” and the “banking school,” and what is your own opinion respecting the matter?
  8. What effects do large issues of paper money have on (a) taxation, (b) prices, (c) wages, (d) creditors, and upon (e) the “demand for money”?
  9. Do you or do you not favor Professor Fisher’s plan for a stabilized dollar? Give your principal reasons.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Mid-year examinations, 1852-1943, Box 11. (Bound volume) Examination Papers, Mid-Years 1925-26.

__________________________

1925-26
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 3
[Mid-year Examination, 1926]

[not (yet) recovered]

__________________________

1926-27
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 3
[Mid-year Examination, 1927]

Answer 8 questions

  1. Define deposits, reserve, surplus, discount.
  2. Describe the use of (a) the one-name promissory note, (b) the trade acceptance, (c) the bankers acceptance, in financing trade.
  3. What, in your opinion, what is the chief defect of the old national banking system? Explain.
  4. What was the principal issue in the controversy that preceded the bank-charter act of 1844? Discuss.
  5. What was the principal issue in the debates of the Restriction period? Discuss.
  6. “Germany’s ability to make reparation payments depends upon her ability to maintain a favorable balance of commodity trade.” How far do you agree? Explain.
  7. Under what conditions and why is goal shipped from one country to another?
  8. Explain the meaning of the statement, “London finances the world’s trade.”
  9. On what advantages has London’s position as the world’s central money market rested? Do you think that London is likely to maintain that position?

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Mid-year examinations, 1852-1943, Box 11. (Bound volume) Examination Papers, Mid-Years 1927.

Image Source: Allyn A. Young faculty portrait in the Harvard Class Album, 1925.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Summer School, Syllabus and Exams for Income Distribution. Bronfenbrenner, 1970

 

 

Try to imagine what a summer school student at Harvard might have thought in the summer of 1970 (scarcely a month after the Kent State University shootings) when confronted with the five page reading list in Martin Bronfenbrenner’s economics course on income distribution. Next jump down to the four page final exam and also imagine that summer student’s reaction.  Well, that was exactly a half-century ago and it was still a time when professors could get away with assigning mountains of reading followed by an examination demanding both comprehension and thought. Chapeau!

Worth noting:  Joan Robinson appeared in four of the seven exam questions. 

_______________________

Summer 1970

INCOME DISTRIBUTION—M. Bronfenbrenner

Text:    B.F. Haley and William Fellner (eds.), Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution.

Note:   Few will have time for even half the materials below. Students should concentrate where their interests are strongest, and/or where class presentation seems weakest.

  1. Introduction
    1. Theoretical

Clark, Distribution of Wealth, Ch. 1.

Galbraith, Affluent Society, Ch. 7.

Kuznets, “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” AER, Mar. 55.
(Reprinted in Kuznets, Economic Growth and Structure.)

Klein, Introduction to Econometrics, Ch. 4.

M. Friedman, “Choice, Chance, and the Personal Distribution of Income,” JPE, Aug. 53.

Mincer, “Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution,” JPE, Aug. 58.

Weintraub, General Theory of the Price Level, Output, Income, and Growth, Ch. 3-4.

Solow, “Constancy of Relative Shares,” AER, Sept. 58, or Bronfenbrenner “Relative Shares and Elasticity of Substitution,” JPE, June 60.

    1. Statistical

Lydall, Structure of Earnings, Ch. 2-4.

Budd, Inequality and Poverty, pp. x-xxviii (Budd), Parts 2-3 (Solow, Goldsmith, Lampman, Projector and Weiss, Stigler, Meade).

Readings, 4 (Bowman) [“A Graphical Analysis of Personal Income Distribution in the United States”]

Kuznets, Shares of Upper Income Groups in Income and Saving, pp. xxvii-xli.

Lampman, “Recent Changes in Income Inequality,” AER, June 54.

Lebergott, “Factor Shares in the Long Run,” in NBER, Behavior of Income Shares, pp. 53-86, or Kravis, “Relative Income Shares in Fact and Theory,” AER, Dec. 59.

Phillips, “Labor Share and Wage Parity,” R.E.Stat., May 60.

  1. Maldistribution?
    1. General Ethical Issues

Budd, Part 1 (Meade and Hitch, de Jouvenel, Wallich, Tawney, Friedman)

Shaw, Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, Ch. 2-14, 20-23 (skim).

Lerner, Economics of Control, Ch. 3.

    1. General Economic Issues

Hobson, Evolution of Modern Capitalism, Ch. 11.

Durbin, Purchasing Power and Trade Depression, Ch. 1.

Bronfenbrenner, Yamane, and Lee, “Study in Redistribution and Consumption,” R.E.Stat., May 55.

Budd, Part 4 (Meade, Friedman, Simons, Pigou).

    1. American Poverty Program

Budd, Part 5 (Harrington, Miller, Ornati, Lampman, Johnson, Ad Hoc Committee on Triple Revolution, Friedman, Tobin)

R.D. Friedman, Poverty, Definition and Perspective, Ch. 2-3.

Green, Negative Taxes and the Poverty Problem, Ch. 4-6, 8.

Thurow, Poverty and Discrimination, Ch. 3-5, 9.

  1. Demand for Productive Inputs
    1. Marginal Productivity

Hicks, Theory of Wages, Ch. 1.

Ferguson, Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution, Ch. 4-6, 9, 12.2.

    1. Complications and Objections

Levinson, Unionism, Wage Trends, and Income Distribution, Ch. 1.

Dobb, Wages, pp. 81-92, Ch. 5.

Weintraub, Approach to the Theory of Income Distribution, Ch. 1.

Readings, 6 (Stigler [“Production and Distribution in the Short Run”]), 8 (Machlup [“On the Meaning of the Marginal Product”]) , 12 (Robertson [“Wage-Grumbles”]), 15 (Rolph [“The Discounted Marginal Productivity Doctrine”]).

The Lester-Machlup-Stigler Controversy: AER, Mar. 46 and Sept. 46, Mar. 47. (Reprinted in Clemence, Readings in Econ. Analysis).

Reder, “Marginal Productivity Reconsidered,” JPE, Oct. 47 (Reprinted in Clemence, Readings in Econ. Analysis.)

    1. Exploitation?

Robinson, Imperfect Competition, Ch. 21-26, or Pigou, pt. III, Ch. 14-19.

Rothschild, Theory of Wages, Ch. 7-8.

Readings 7 (Chamberlin [“Monopolistic Competition and the Productivity Theory of Distribution”]), 14 (Bloom [“A Reconsideration of the Theory of Exploitation”]).

Bronfenbrenner, “Potential Monopsony,” Ind. Labor Rel. Rev., Apr. 56.

    1. Impact of Innovations

Ferguson, Ch. 12.3, 16.

Readings, 9 (Robinson [“The Classification of Inventions”]), 10 (Lange [“A Note on Innovations”])

Stiglitz and Uzawa, Readings in Modern Theory of Economic Growth, 6 (Hicks [“From Theory of Wages”]), 9 (Fellner [“Two Propositions in the Theory of Induced Innovations”]), 10 (Kennedy [“Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution”]).

Seeber, “Classification of Inventions,” So. Ec. J., Apr. 62.

  1. Labor Supply

Rothschild, Ch. 3, or Stigler, Theory of Price (3rd), pp. 194-202.

Readings, 13 (Robbins [“On the Elasticity of Demand for Income in Terms of Effort”]).

Long, The Labor Force Under Changing Income and Employment, Ch. 1.

Break, “Income Taxes, Wage Rates, and Factor Services,” Natl. Tax J., Dec. 53.

  1. Collective Bargaining
    1. Theory and Evidence

Hicks, Ch. 7.

Readings, 19 (Dunlop [Wage Policies of Trade Unions]).

Ross, Trade Union Wage Policy, Ch. 2, 6.

Fellner, Competition Among the Few, Ch. 10.

Rees, Economics of Trade Unions, Ch. 4-5.

Lewis, Unionism and Relative Wages in U.S., Ch. 1, 4-6.

Bronfenbrenner, “Incidence of Collective Bargaining Once More,” So. Ec. J., Apr. 58. (Reprinted in Galenson and Lipset, Labor and Trade Unionism.)

    1. The Labor Monopoly Issue

Simons, Economic Policy for a Free Society, Ch. 6.

Lester, “The Labor Monopoly Issue,” JPE, Dec. 47.

Lindblom, Unions and Capitalism, Ch. 1-3, 14-18.

Lerner, Economics of Employment, Part IV, or Rothschild, Ch. 13.

    1. Wage Difference (Omitted in Class)

Mill, Principles of Political Economy, Bk. II, Ch. 14.

Dobb, Ch. 6.

Mills, White Collar, Ch. 6-7, or Harris, Market for College Graduates, Ch. 3, 3-a.

McCaffree, “Earnings Differential Between White Collar and Manual Occupations,” R.E.Stat., Feb. 53.

Burns, “Comparative Economic Position of Manual and White Collar Employees,” Journ. Of Bus., Oct. 54.

Reder, “Wage Differentials,” in NBER, Aspects of Labor Economics, pp. 257-99.

  1. Wages and Employment

Keynes, General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Ch. 19.

Readings, 18 (Tarshis [“Changes in Real and Money Wages”]), 17 (Lerner [“The Relation of Wage Policies and Price Policies”]).

Slichter-Nathan Controversy: “Raising the Price of Labor as a Method of Increasing Employment,” R.E.Stat., Nov. 49.

Bronfenbrenner, “Contribution to Aggregative Theory of Wages,” JPE, Dec. 56.

  1. Theory of Interest
    1. Real Theories

Conard, Introduction to the Theory of Interest, Ch. 3, 4, 7.

Hirschleifer, “Theory of Optimal Investment Decision,” JPE, Aug. 58.

Knight, “Interest,” in Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, or, “Diminishing Returns from Investment,” JPE, Mar. 44.

Patinkin, Money, Interest, and Prices, Ch. 4.

    1. Monetary Theories

Readings, 22 (Keynes [“The Theory of the Rate of Interest”]), 23 (Robertson [“Mr. Keynes and the Rate of Interest”]), 24 (Hicks [“Mr. Keynes and the ‘Classics’; A Suggested Interpretation”]).

Harris, (Ed.), New Economics, 43-46 (Lerner).

Lange, “Rate of Interest and Optimum Propensity to Consume,” in AEA, Readings in Business Cycle Theory, 8.

Conard, Ch. 9-10.

Patinkin, Ch. 15.

    1. Rate Differences

Readings, 26 (Lutz [“The Structure of Interest Rates”])

Hicks, Value and Capital (2nd), pp. 144-52.

Conard, Ch. 17.

Kessel, “Cyclical Behavior of Term Structure of Interest Rates,” (NBER Occasional Paper 91), Ch. 1.

  1. Theory of Rent

Ricardo, Principles of Political Economy, Ch. 2.

George, Progress and Poverty, Bk. III, Ch. 2; also skim Books IV-VI.

Robertson, Lectures on Political Economy, Vol. ii, Ch. 3

Readings, 31 (Buchanan [“The Historical Approach to Rent and Price Theory”]).

Ferguson, Ch. 1.4.2, 2.2.1, 2.3.2, 3.4.3.

  1. Theory of Profit

Knight, Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, Ch. 1-2, 8-9.

Readings, 27 (Knight [“Profit”]), 29 (Gordon [“Enterprise, Profits, and the Modern Corporation”]), 30 (Crum [“Corporate Earnings on Invested Capital”]).

Weston, “Generalized Uncertainty Theory of Profit,” AER, Mar. 50.

Marchal, “New Theory of Profits,” AER, Sept. 51.

Bronfenbrenner, “Rehabilitation of Naïve Profit Theory,” So. Ec. J., Apr. 60 (Reprinted in Brait and Hochman, Readings in Microeconomics).

Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress, Profits Hearings, Dec. 48. (Testimony of Slichter, Harris, Ruttenberg, Montgomery, and Nixon on definition and measurement).

  1. Aggregative Distribution Theories

Scitovsky, “Some Theories of Income Distribution,” in NBER, Behavior of Income Shares, pp. 15-31.

Davidson, Theories of Aggregate Income Distribution, Ch. 4-8.

Douglas, “Are There Laws of Production?” AER, Mar. 48. (Reprinted in Kelley edition of Douglas, Theory of Wages.)

Ferguson, Ch. 12.4-12.9, 15.

Readings, 11 (Kalecki [“The Distribution of the National Income”]), or Rothschild, Ch. 15.

Boulding, Reconstruction of Economics, Ch. 14.

Stiglitz and Uzawa, 21 (Kaldor [“Alternative Theories of Distribution”]) [Also in Kaldor, Essays in Value and Distribution, no. 10.], 22 (Robinson).

Reder, “Alternative Theories of Labor’s Share,” in Abramovitz, Allocation of Economic Resources.

Source:  Duke University, David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Economists’ Papers Archives. Papers of Martin Bronfenbrenner, Box 25, Folder “Micro-econ + Distribution, 1 of 2, 1966-71, n.d.”

_______________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Economics S-222—Income Distribution
Summer 1970—M. Bronfenbrenner
Final Examination

In a (probably unsuccessful) attempt to make my own position clear on a number of controversial issues, I have perhaps understressed in class certain powerful statements of contrary positions.

For purposes of this examination, please consider any four of the quotations below. Indicate the portions of distribution theory to which they apply. Then comment upon them, indicating why they do (or do not) appear convincing.

  1. Technical conditions and the rate of profit determine the pattern of normal prices, including the price of labour-time in terms of each commodity; money-wage rates determine the corresponding money price level. But what determines the rate of profit?
    Marx closes his system sometimes (following Ricardo) by postulating a real-wage rate governed by the conventional standard of life (the value of labour-time) and sometimes by taking as given the share of net profit in the value of net output (the rate of exploitation). Marshall conceals the problem behind a smoke-screen of moral sentiments. The latter-day neoclassicals are for ever chasing definitions around a circular argument. Sraffa offers no observations on the subject. Von Neumann postulates a real-wage rate which is precisely specified in terms of particular quantities of particular commodities, but leaves us helpless when that assumption is relaxed. The question of what determines the rate of profit, when the real-wage rate is not to be taken as given, is a huge blank in traditional economic teaching.
    [Joan Robinson, Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth, p. 11]
  2. Even from the momentary market point of view, the Keynesian formulation tends to obscure unduly the parts played by Productivity and Thrift…While there are hints here and there of a broader treatment, in the main (Mr. Keynes’) plan is to set the rate of interest in a direct functional relation only with that part of the money stock which is held for what he calls “speculative reasons”, i.e., because it is expected that the rate of interest will subsequently rise. Thus the rate of interest is what it is because it is expected to become other than it is; if it is not expected to become other than it is, there is nothing left to tell us why it is what it is. The organ which secretes it has been amputated, and yet it somehow still exists—a grin without a cat. Mr. Plumptre of Toronto…has aptly compared the position of the lenders of money under this theory with that of an insurance company which charges its clients a premium, the only risk against which it insures them being the risk that its premium will be raised.
    [Dennis H. Robertson, “Mr. Keynes and the Rate of Interest” in Essays in Monetary Theory, 1940. Pages 35-36.]

The price of pig
Is something big,
Because its corn, you’ll understand,
Is high-priced too;
Because it grew
Upon the high-priced farming land.

If you’d know why
That land is high,
Consider this: its price is big
Because it pays
Thereon to raise
The costly corn, the high-priced pig!

 [Herbert Joseph Davenport, The Economics of Enterprise, 1913. Pages 107-108]

  1. The level of money-wage rates obtaining at any particular moment is an historical accident. The absolute level of wages in terms of money affects nothing except the words and numbers in which money values are reckoned and the nominal value of the stock of currency. But changes in the level of money-wage rates have important effects upon the behavior of the economy in real terms.
    The causes of movements in money-wage rates are bound up with the competition of different groups of workers to maintain or improve their relative positions, and the consequences of changes in wage levels are most important in connection with the competition in international trade.
    The level of money-wage rates may be continuously rising simply because it is easier for each group of employers to give way to the demands of their workers and recoup themselves by raising prices than to incur the losses and unpleasantness involved in resisting them.
    [Joan Robinson, Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth, pp. 70-71]
  2. A distinction should be made between primary and secondary distribution of the national income.
    The national income first of all falls into the hands of the capitalists. Primary distribution of the national income consists on its being distributed between capitalists and workers. The workers receive wages, the capitalists surplus value, which is distributed among the industrialists, merchants, bankers, and big landed proprietors.
    After the national income has been distributed among the basic elements of capitalist society, a secondary distribution or redistribution takes place. We have seen that in the non-productive branches of the economy (medical institutions, public services, entertainments, etc.) no national income is created. But the capitalists who control these enterprizes and institutions pay salaries to their employees, cover the cost of maintaining premises, and in addition make a profit. The capitalists cover all these items of expenditure out of the national income created in the sphere of material production by charging for the services provided. These payments produce an average profit for the capitalists in the non-productive sphere. Part of the income of the working people is (also) redistributed through the state budget in the interests of the ruling class. The bourgeois state has its army, police, penal institutions and courts, administrative apparatus and so on. All are maintained out of the state budget, taxes levied upon the population being its main source of revenue. After working people have received wages through the primary distribution on the national income, they have to pay taxes out of them. In this way, the part of the national income put at the disposal of the working people is reduced. (Capitalists, too, pay taxes. But part is returned in the form of extremely high payment for supplies and service to the government. Another part is spent in the upkeep of the state apparatus, army and so on, the chief purpose of which is to defend the interests of these same capitalists.)
    This is why not only the distribution, but also the redistribution of the national income in bourgeois society is effected in the interests of the exploiting classes.
    [P. Nikitin, Fundamentals of Political Economy, trans. Violet Dutt and Murad Saifulin (probably 1966), pp. 133-135 quoted by Martin Bronfenbrenner in Income Distribution Theory, Chapter 2, footnote 12. Cf: 1983 Translation of a later edition by Jane Syer, pp. 151-152.]
  3. The neo-classical model is most at its ease in a stationary state. The amount of capital that capitalists are willing to maintain in being (neither saving nor dissaving) is a function of the rate of interest, or, alternatively, there is one rate of interest at which net saving is zero. The physical stock of capital and the real-wage rate are such as to have brought the rate of profit into equality with the rate of interest. There is then one value of the stock of capital that yields the rate of return (with a given labor force fully employed) which will cause it to be maintained. This is the value of capital that satisfies the conditions of the stationary state.
    When it leaves the stationary state, the neo-classical model is all at sea. With any given value of capital in existence, the amount of saving that the capitalists wish to do to increase it depends upon the rate of interest, which must be equal to the rate of profit, but how can we tell what the rate of profit is till we know the rate of accumulation?
    It is an illusion to suppose that “the marginal productivity of capital” provides an independent determinant of the rate of interest. A “quantity of capital” in terms of value has no meaning in terms of physical productivity until the prices of its physical components are known, and this involves the rate of profit. A “quantity of capital” in terms of a list of physical capital goods appropriate to various kinds of output, if they are taken to be fully utilized, entails the output of investment goods, and so the rate of accumulation, independently of the rate of profit that is supposed to determine it. If they are not necessarily fully utilized, then we have to know the current rate of investment to find out the state of effective demand and current profits. Whatever we do, we are one equation short.
    The reason why the model works all right in the stationary state has nothing to do with its stationariness. It works because the rate of accumulation—zero—is specified. With any specified rate of accumulation, the function connecting saving with the rate of profit determines the position, for it shows what the rate of profit and the value of capital must be to make saving equal to investment at full employment.
    [Joan Robinson, Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth, pp. 81-82]
  4. The theory of the distribution of the product of industry between wages and profits which is knocking about in current economic teaching consists of a number of propositions, each of which is quite unexceptionable in itself, but none of which bears any relation to the rest…The proposition that the share of profits in income is a function of the ratio of investment to income is perfectly correct, but capacity and the degree of monopoly have to be brought in to determine what income it is that profits are a share of, and investment is related to.
    [Joan Robinson, Collected Economic Papers, II, p. 145]

L’ENVOI

The bookful blockhead, ignorantly read,
With loads of learned lumber in his head.

(Alexander Pope)

 Source: Duke University, David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Economists’ Papers Archives. Papers of Martin Bronfenbrenner, Box 24, Folder “Exams. Micro-econ + distribution. 2 of 2, 1954-66, n.d.”

Image Source: Martin Bronfenbrenner. University of Minnesota Archives/Libraries/Umedia.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Course outlines and semester exams in money and banking. Smith and Dorfman, 1958-59

 

I was surprised to find that as late as 1958-59 Harvard had no course on its books that even used the word “macroeconomics” in the title. The door to macroeconomics was instead found in undergraduate, graduate courses that were devoted to money and banking: Economics 141–Money, Banking, and Economic Fluctuations” and Economics 241–“Principles of Money and Banking”. I have to admit that I was somewhat puzzled to see the macroeconomist Warren Smith paired with the microeconomist Robert Dorfman for the graduate sequence. Maybe it was because Keynesian economics attracted the whiz-kids of mathematical economics of the time that the department turned to Robert Dorfman for graduate instruction in Keynesian economics, the main subject covered in his semester of the two semester Economics 241 course.

Before getting to the course outlines and exams, I provide memorial minutes  for Warren Smith, who was a visiting professor at Harvard that year from the University of Michigan, and Robert Dorfman, a member of the Harvard faculty, recently acquired from the Berkeley economics department.

___________________________

University of Michigan, LSA Minutes. Memorial.

WARREN L. SMITH
1914 – 1972

Professor Warren Lounsbury Smith was born in Watertown, New York, on March 23, 1914, He died in Ann Arbor on April 23, 1972, He had come to The University of Michigan as a freshman in 1940, and in 1943 he married fellow student Ann Elizabeth Schwartz of Ann Arbor, His studies were interrupted by military service during World War II, but he continued a brilliant career as a student here, earning the B.A.in 1947, the M.A. in 1949, and the Ph.D. in Economics in 1952.

Warren Smith’s professional life as an economist thus began relatively late, at the age of 38. His accomplishments during the all-too-brief span of only 20 years are, therefore, all the more remarkable. He taught both undergraduate and graduate courses in the Economics Department at Michigan while still a student. After teaching at the University of Virginia and Ohio State University, he returned to Michigan in 1957 with the rank of Associate Professor of Economics. He was promoted to full professor in 1959, and served as Chairman of the Department of Economics from 1963 to 1967 and again in 1970-71. Professor Smith was regarded by graduate and undergraduate students alike as an absolutely superb teacher. His devotion to his responsibilities to students, both in and out of the classroom, brought him the deepest admiration and respect of all those who were privileged to know him in this capacity.

Excellence in teaching, however, was not gained at the expense of scholarship and service to the Department, the University, and the Nation. As Chairman of the Department Professor Smith was unstinting in the time and energy devoted to the task of finding the means to satisfaction of the needs of the Department. His colleagues are universally agreed that a very large part of the qualities of excellence now found in the Department are attributable to his stewardship.

Professor Smith’s public service contributions were both extensive and highly acclaimed. He served as consultant to the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress, the Commission on Money and Credit, the Department of Justice, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the Council of Economic Advisers, and appeared frequently as a public witness before Congressional Committees. In 1962-63 he served as Senior Economist on the Staff of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, and in 1968-69 he was a member of the Council.

But in the world of professional economists Warren Smith’s most magnificent monument, the living testimony to the greatness that he achieved, is to be found in his published articles and monographs and his Macroeconomics. As a scholar Professor Smith won world-wide renown, His work was always relevant, always expressive of the keenest insights, and always lucidly and forcefully presented. Few, if any, American economists have done more to shape current thinking on monetary and fiscal policy and debt management than Warren Smith.

To Ann Achwartz Smith, his wife, and to his children, Andrew, Samuel, and Catherine, we the faculty of the Department of Economics and of the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts convey our sense of deepest personal loss. No one in our midst has ever more fully and completely exemplified the finest qualities of friend, colleague, teacher, scholar, and public servant than Warren Lounsbury Smith. The lives of all of us have been enriched because we were privileged to know him.

Peter O. Steiner

Source: Warren Lunsbury Smith Memorial Minute, University of Michigan, Faculty History Project.

___________________________

Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Science, Memorial Minute
Robert [Elihu] Dorfman

Robert Dorfman, the late David A. Wells Professor of Political Economy, Emeritus, was a leader in the introduction of mathematical methods to economics in the twentieth century. He died on June 24, 2002, at his home in Belmont, Massachusetts.

Dorfman made important contributions, particularly as a pioneer in the use of linear programming, characterizing production relationships in terms of individual activities with fixed coefficients. He collaborated in 1958 with MIT Professors (and later Nobel laureates) Robert M. Solow and Paul A. Samuelson on the classic Linear Programming and Economic Analysis.

He believed that mathematical methods were key – both as analytical tools and as means of exposition. In this regard, Jerry Green, John Leverett Professor in the University and David A. Wells Professor of Political Economy, said at Dorfman’s memorial service in 2002, “He was an ambassador for the future of our field.”

Dorfman wrote in 1954: “Is mathematics necessary in social science? I suppose not. It is quite conceivable that all problems could be solved by verbal means, just as it is possible to find that the square root of CXCVI is XIV. Such methods, though, would be not only painful but fearfully inefficient.”

Dorfman also made significant contributions to environmental economics. Beginning in 1972, he edited with his wife, Nancy S. Dorfman, three editions of Economics of the Environment. Testimony to the lasting value of this work is the fact that it is now in its sixth edition (edited since 2000 by Robert Stavins, Albert Pratt Professor of Business and Government at the Kennedy School).

In this realm, Dorfman understood the importance of the underlying natural science. His analysis of water resources in Pakistan, for example, drew on collaborations with engineers and hydrologists. He was for many years an affiliate of Harvard’s Center for Population Studies, where he helped introduce optimization methodologies for resource management to developing countries.

Dorfman’s career at Harvard spanned 32 years. He was Professor of Economics from 1955 to 1972, and then David A. Wells Professor of Political Economy until his retirement in 1987. He was known by junior colleagues as a marvelous mentor. Henry Rosovsky once said that the kindest five words that can be said to a young scholar are, “I have read your thesis.” Jerry Green has observed, “That was exactly what Bob said to me the first time we met. I am sure he said the same to many others.”

From 1976 to 1984, Dorfman served as editor of the Quarterly Journal of Economics. Green, an associate editor, observed his style: “I saw how he worked with articles and authors of all kinds. Diamonds in the rough had to be polished.”

Dorfman enjoyed a reputation as a masterful teacher, especially at the graduate level. He taught mathematical economics, microeconomic theory, macroeconomic theory, and econometrics, and thereby – in the words of Dale Jorgenson, Samuel W. Morris University Professor – “almost single- handedly brought the Harvard graduate program to the level of competing institutions.” Jorgenson recalls the course he took from Dorfman, and counts himself among “the fortunate students who were brought to the frontier of research in economic theory.”

In the 1970s, Dorfman launched a seminar series on the economics of information and organizations with Professor Kenneth Arrow and Richard Zeckhauser, Frank Plumpton Ramsey Professor of Political Economy at the Kennedy School. Generations of young scholars benefitted from this colloquium, including Green, who later became a co-chair. Zeckhauser recalls that “the most faithful presenter was Eric Maskin (now Professor of Economics), who was then starting to develop his pioneering work in mechanism design that would ultimately win him the Nobel Prize.”

Born on October 27, 1916, in New York City, Dorfman received his B.A. in mathematical statistics from Columbia College in 1936 and an M.A. in economics from Columbia University in 1937. Dorfman was a wartime pioneer in operations research. From 1939 to 1943, he worked as a statistician for the federal government, and then served during World War II as an operations analyst for the U.S. Army Air Force, based in the Southwest Pacific theater and in Washington, D.C.

After the war, Dorfman enrolled at the University of California, Berkeley, earning his Ph.D. degree in economics in 1950. He joined the faculty at Berkeley, where he was an associate professor of economics when he moved to Harvard in 1955.

Among his scholarly contributions were four classic articles in the American Economic Review: “Mathematical or ‘Linear’ Programming” (1953), “Operations Research” (1960), “An Economic Interpretation of Optimal Control Theory” (1969), and “Incidence of the Benefits and Costs of Environmental Programs” (1977).

Dorfman was a Distinguished Fellow of the American Economic Association and a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, as well as vice president of the American Economic Association, and vice president of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. In 1972, when Dorfman was inducted as a Distinguished Fellow of the American Economic Association, his citation included this summary: “Robert Dorfman’s characteristic intellectual style is based on a deep and painstaking mastery of the theoretical fundamentals, leading to a clear intuitive grasp of intellectual questions and thence to masterly exposition.”

Thirty years later, his co-author Robert Solow characterized him as “always polite, even self- deprecating, never assertive, he nevertheless stood his ground. If Bob Dorfman mildly and quizzically expressed some hesitation about your pet idea, it was always a good move to look up, just in case a boulder was about to crash down on you—politely, of course.”

According to his wife, Nancy, Dorfman turned to mathematics in college as a substitute for poetry, after concluding that he did not have a future as a poet. But his love of literature was reflected in the clarity and grace with which he explained complex economics in simple terms.

Robert Dorfman is survived by his wife, Nancy, of Lexington; his son, Peter, of Belmont; his daughter, Ann, of Newton; granddaughter, Joni Waldron, of Washington, D.C.; and grandson, Loren Waldron, of Newton.

Respectfully submitted,

Jerry Green
Dale W. Jorgenson Peter P. Rogers
Robert N. Stavins, Chair

SourceThe Harvard Gazette, November 14, 2012.

___________________________

Course Announcement.

Economics 241. Principles of Money and Banking

Full course. M., W., (F.), at 12. Professor Dorfman (spring term) and Associate Professor Warren Smith (University of Michigan).

SourceOfficial Register of Harvard University. Vol. LV, No. 20 (September 3, 1958), p. 95.

___________________________

Course Enrollment.

[Economics] 241 Principles of Money and Banking, (F) Associate Professor Warren Smith (University of Michigan); (S) Professor Dorfman. Full course.

(F) Total 20: 16 Gr., 2 Ra., 2 Others.
(S) Total 18: 16, 1 Ra., 1 Other.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1958-1959, p.73.

___________________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY

Outline and Reading List
Economics 241: Principles of Money and Banking

Fall, 1958-59

  1. Monetary Mechanics
    1. (Sept. 22-29) Determinants of Member Bank Reserves and Money Supply Assignments:

Assignments: W. H. Steiner, E. Shapiro, and E. Solomon, Money and Banking (4th, 1958), Part III; E. S. Shaw, Money, Income, and Monetary Policy (1950), Chaps. II, III, X, XI; Bank Reserves: Some Major Factors Affecting Them (1953); The Treasury and the Money Market (1954).

References: J. P. Powelson, Economic Accounting (1955), Chaps. 13, 25; M.A. Copeland and D.H. Brill, “Banking Assets and Money Supply Since 1929,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, Jan. 1948, pp. 24-32; “A Flow-of-Funds System of National Accounts: Annual Estimates,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, Oct. 1955, pp. 1085-1124; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Flow of Funds in the United States, 1939-53 (1955); M. A. Copeland, A Study of Moneyflows in the United States (1955); M.A. Copeland, A Study of Moneyflows in the United States (1952).

    1. (Oct. 1-6) Bank Credit Expansion

Assignments: A.G. Hart, Money, Debt, and Economic Activity (2d ed., 1953), Chap. IV; Shaw, Money, Income, and Monetary Policy, Chaps. VI, VII.

References: J.W. Angell and K. Ficek, “Expansion of Bank Credit,” Journal of Political Economy, XLI, 1933, pp. 1-32, 152-193; W.F. Crick, “The Genesis of Bank Deposits,” Economica, VII, 1927, pp. 191-202, reprinted in F.A. Lutz and L.W. Mints (eds.), Readings in Monetary Theory (1951), pp. 41-53; D. Vining, “A Process Analysis of Bank Credit Expansion,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LIV, 1940, pp. 599-623.

    1. Monetary Policy
      1. (Oct. 8-17) Techniques of Control

Assignments: E.A. Goldenweiser, American Monetary Policy (1951), Chap. V; Monetary Policy and Management of the Public Debt (Patman Committee Documents), Replies to Questions and Other Material, Part 1, pp. 275-299; R.V. Roosa, Federal Reserve Operations in the Money and Government Securities Markets (1956); W.L. Smith, “The Discount Rate as a Credit-Control Weapon,” Journal of Political Economy, LXVI, April 1958, pp. 171-177.

References: Steiner, Shapiro, and Solomon, Money and Banking (4th), Chaps. 12-14; Hart, Money, Debt, and Economic Activity, Chaps. V, VI; W. W. Riefler, Money Rates and Money Markets in the United States(1930); D.A. Alhadeff, Monopoly and Competition in Banking (1954); G. L. Bach, Federal Reserve Policy Making (1950); L. Currie, The Supply and Control of Money in the United States (1934); C.O. Hardy, Credit Policies of the Federal Reserve System (1932); S.E. Harris, Twenty Years of Federal Reserve Policy (1933), 2 vols.; Patman Committee Documents (1952).

      1. (Oct. 20-Nov. 5) How Monetary Policy Works

Assignments: Hart, Money, Debt, and Economic Activity (2nd), Chaps. XVII, XVIII; J. Tobin, “Liquidity Preference and Monetary Policy,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XXIX, May 1947, reprinted in A. Smithies and J.K. Butters (eds.) Readings in Fiscal Policy (1955), pp. 233-247; H.S. Ellis, “The Rediscovery of Money,” and R.V. Roosa, “Interest Rates and the Central Bank,” both in Money, Trade, and Economic Growth: In Honor of John Henry Williams (1951), pp. 253-269 and 270-295, respectively; “Influence of Credit and Monetary Measures on Economic Stability,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, March 1953, pp. 219-234; J.G. Gurley and E.S. Shaw, “Financial Aspects of Economic Development,” American Economic Review, XLV, Sept. 1955, pp. 515-538; W.L. Smith, “On the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy,” American Economic Review, XLVI, Sept. 1956, pp. 588-606; “Consumer Instalment Credit” (A Review Article), American Economic Review, XLVII, Dec. 1957, pp. 966-984; and “Monetary Policy and the Structure of Markets,” in The Relationship of Prices to Economic Stability and Growth, Compendium of Papers Submitted by Panelists Appearing before the Joint Economic Committee (1958), pp. 493-511; D. Carson, “Recent Open Market Committee Policy and Technique,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXIX, Aug. 1955, pp. 321-342; A.H. Hansen, The American Economy (1957), Chaps. 3,4.

References: G.L.S. Shackle, “Interest Rates and the Pace of Investment,” Economic Journal, LVI, March 1946, pp. 1-17; F.A. Lutz, “The Interest Rate and Investment in a Dynamic Economy,” American Economic Review, XXXV, Dec. 1945, pp. 811-830; T. Wilson and P.W.S. Andrews, Oxford Studies in the Price Mechanism (1951), Chap. I; W.H. White, “Interest Inelasticity of Investment Demand—The Case from Business Attitude Surveys Re-examined,” American Economic Review, XLVI, Sept. 1956, pp. 565-587; J.R. Meyer and E. Kuh, The Investment Decision (1957); R.A. Musgrave, “Credit Controls, Interest Rates, and Management of the Public Debt,” in Income, Employment, and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of Alvin H. Hansen (1948), pp. 221-254; and “Monetary-Debt Policy Revisited,” in C.J. Friedrich and J.K. Galbraith (eds.), Public Policy, Vol. V, 1954; W.L. Smith and R.F. Mikesell, “The Effectiveness of Monetary Policy: Recent British Experience,” Journal of Political Economy, LXV, Feb. 1957, pp. 18-39; H.P. Minsky, “Central Banking and Money Market Changes,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXXI, May 1957, pp. 171-187; United States Monetary Policy: Recent Thinking and Experience (Joint Committee on the Economic Report, 1954); Monetary Policy: 1955-56 (Joint Economic Committee, 1956); E. Miller, “Monetary Policy in a Changing World,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXX, Feb. 1956, pp. 23-43; Symposium on Monetary Policy, Bulletin of the Oxford Institute of Statistics, April, May, and August 1952; J. Tobin, “Monetary Policy and the Management of the Public Debt: The Patman Inquiry,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXV, May 1953, pp. 118-127; P.A. Samuelson, “Recent American Monetary Controversy” Three Banks Review, March 1956, pp. 3-21; and statement to the Patman Committee, Monetary Policy and Management of the Public Debt, Hearings, pp. 691-698; H.G. Johnson, “The Revival of Monetary Policy in Britain,” Three Banks Review, June 1956, pp. 3-20; J.K. Galbraith, “Market Structure and Stabilization Policy,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXIX, May 1957, pp. 124-133; C.R. Whittlesey, “Monetary Policy and Economic Change,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXIX, Feb. 1957, pp. 31-39; A.H. Hansen, “Monetary Policy,” RES, XXXVII, May 1955, pp. 110-119; S. Weintraub, “Monetary Policy: A Comment,” RES, XXXVII, Aug. 1955, pp. 292-296; J.H. Karekin, “Lenders’ Preferences, Credit Rationing, and the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy,” RES, XXXIX, Aug. 1957, pp. 292-301; R.S. Sayers, Central Banking after Bagehot (1957); Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Consumer Instalment Credit, 6 vols. (1957); Financing Small Business, Report to the Committees on Banking and Currency and the Select Committees on Small Business by the federal Reserve System, Parts 1 and 2 (1958); Investigation of the Financial Condition of the United States, Hearings before the Senate Finance Committee, Parts 1, 2, and 3 (1957).

  1. Fiscal Policy
    1. (Nov. 7-14) Fiscal Policy and National Income

Assignments: R.L. Bishop, “Alternative Expansionist Fiscal Policies: A Diagrammatic Analysis,” in Income, Employment, and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of Alvin H. Hansen, pp. 317-340; R.A. Musgrave, “Alternative Budget Policies for Full Employment,” American Economic Review, XXX, June 1945, pp. 387-400, reprinted in Smithies and Butters (eds.), Readings in Fiscal Policy, pp. 291-306; and “Money Liquidity, and the Valuation of Assets,” in Money, Trade, and Economic Growth: In Honor of John Henry Williams(1951), pp. 216-242.

References: J.A. Maxwell, Fiscal Policy, (1955); O.H.Brownlee and E.D. Allen, Economics of Public Finance(2d ed.; 1954), Part II; J.F. Due, Government Finance: An Economic Analysis (1954), Chaps. 25-28; H.M. Somers, Public Finance and National Income (1949), esp. Part VI.

    1. (Nov. 17-19) Automatic Fiscal Stabilizers

Assignments: R.A. Musgrave and M.H. Miller, “Built-In Flexibility,” American Economic Review, XXXVIII, March 1948, pp. 122-128, reprinted in Smithies and Butters (eds.), Readings in Fiscal Policy, pp. 379-386; Hart, Money, Debt, and Economic Activity (2d ed.) Chaps. XXVII and XXVIII; M. Friedman, “A Monetary and Fiscal Framework for Economic Stability,” AER, XXXVIII, June 1948, pp. 245-264, reprinted in Lutz and Mints (eds.), Readings in Monetary Theory, pp. 369-393; Committee for Economic Development, Taxes and the Budget: A Program for Prosperity in a Free Economy (1947); W.W. Heller, “The CED’s Stabilizing Budget Policy after Ten Years,” AER, XLII, Sept. 1947, pp. 634-651.

References: D.W. Lusher, “The Stabilizing Effectiveness of Budget Flexibility,” together with comments thereon, in Policies to Combat Depression (National Bureau of Economic Research, 1956), pp. 77-122; W. Egle, Economic Stabilization: Objectives, Rules and Mechanisms (1952), Chaps. 3-7; E.C. Brown, “The Static Theory of Automatic Fiscal Stabilization,” Journal of Political Economy, LXIII, Oct. 1955, pp. 427-440.

    1. (Nov. 21-Dec.1) Discretionary Tax and Expenditure Adjustments Assignments:

Assignments: Hart, Money, Debt, and Economic Activity (2d ed.) Chaps. XXIX and XXX; A. Smithies, “Federal Budgeting and Fiscal Policy,” in H.S. Ellis (ed.), A Survey of Contemporary Economics, Vol. I (1948), pp. 174-209; P.A. Samuelson, “Principles and Rules in Modern Fiscal Policy: A Neo-Classical Reformulation,” in Money, Trade, and Economic Growth: In Honor of John Henry Williams (1951), pp. 157-176.

References: G. Haberler, Prosperity and Depression (3d ed., 1946), Chap. 13; R. Goode, “Anti-Inflationary Implications of Alternative Forms of Taxation,” AER Papers and Proceedings, XLXX (May 1952), pp. 147-160; G. Colm, “The Corporation and the Corporation Income Tax in the American Economy,” J.K. Butters, “Taxation, Incentives, and Financial Capacity” (reprinted in Readings in Fiscal Policy, pp. 502-520); and J. Lintner, “The Effect of Corporate Income Tax on Real Investment,” all in AER Papers and Proceedings, XLIV, May 1954, pp. 486-503, 504-519, and 520-534, respectively; E.C. Brown, “Consumption Taxes and Income Determination,” AER, XL, March 1950, pp. 74-89; R. Blough, The Federal Taxing Process (1952); A. Smithies, The Budgetary Process in the United States (1955) H.M. Somers, Public Finance and National Income, Part II; Federal Tax Policy for Economic Growth and Stability, Papers Submitted by Panelists Appearing before the Subcommittee on Tax Policy of the Joint Committee on the Economic Report (1955); Federal Expenditure Policy for Economic Growth and Stability, Papers Submitted by Panelists Appearing before the Subcommittee on Fiscal Policy of the Joint Economic Committee (1957).

    1. (Dec. 3-10) Debt Management

Assignments: E.R. Ralph, “Principles of Debt Management,” AER, XLVII, June 1957, pp. 301-320; R.V.Roosa, “Integrating Debt Management and Open Market Operations,” AER Papers and Proceedings, XLII, May 1952, pp. 214-235, reprinted in Smithies and Butters (eds), Readings in Fiscal Policy, pp. 265-288; Committee for Economic Development, Managing the Federal Debt (1954) E.A. Goldenweiser, American Monetary Policy, Chap. III.

References: J.M. Buchanan, Public Principles of Public Debt (1958); H.C. Murphy, The National Debt in War and Transition (1950); L.V. Chandler, Inflation in the United States, 1940-48 (1951); C.C. Abbott, The Federal Debt: Structure and Impact (1953); Patman Committee Documents (1952); General Credit Control, Debt Management and Economic Stabilization (Joint Committee on the Economic Report, 1951); Investigation of the Financial Condition of the United States, Hearings before the Senate Finance Committee, Parts 1, 2, and 3 (1957); “Proposal for a Special Reserve Requirement against the Time and Demand Deposits of Banks,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, Jan. 1948, pp. 14-23; J. Cohen, “A Theoretical Framework for Treasury Debt Management,” American Economic Review, XLV, June 1955, pp. 320-344.

    1. (Dec. 12-19) Co-ordination of Stabilization Policies

Assignments: P.A. Samuelson, “The New Look in Tax and Fiscal Policy,” in Federal Tax Policy for Economic Growth and Stability, (Joint Committee on the Economic Report, 1955), pp. 229-234; R.A. Musgrave, “The Optimal Mix of Stabilization Policies,” in The Relationship of Prices to Economic Stability and Growth, Compendium of Papers Presented by Panelists Appearing before the Joint Economic Committee (1958), pp. 597-609; W.L. Smith, “Monetary-Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXXI, Feb. 1957, pp. 36-55; A. Smithies, “The Control of Inflation,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXIX, Aug. 1957, pp. 272-283.

References: P.A. Samuelson, “Full Employment versus Progress and other Economic Goals,” in M.F. Milliken (ed.), Income Stabilization for a Developing Democracy (1953), pp. 547-580; R.A. Musgrave, “Monetary-Debt Policy Revisited,” in C.J. Friedrich and J.K. Galbraith (eds.), Public Policy, Vol. V, 1954; J. Tobin, “Monetary Policy and Management of the Public Debt: The Patman Inquiry,” RES, XXV, May 1953, pp. 118-127; G.L. Bach, “Monetary-Fiscal Policy Reconsidered,” Journal of Political Economy, LVII, Oct. 1949, pp. 383-394, reprinted in Smithies and Butters (eds.), Readings in Fiscal Policy (1955), pp. 248-264.

General References

Federal Reserve Bulletin (monthly), Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Treasury Bulletin (monthly), U.S. Treasury Department.

Survey of Current Business (monthly), U.S. Dept. of Commerce.

Monthly Review of Credit and Business Conditions (monthly), Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Monthly bulletins are also published by the other eleven Federal Reserve banks.

International Financial Statistics (monthly), International Monetary Fund.

Report on Assets, Liabilities, and Capital Accounts—Commercial and Mutual Savings Banks (semiannually), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Federal Reserve Chart Book on Financial and Business Statistics (monthly), Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Historical Supplement to Federal Reserve Chart Book (annually in September), Board of Governors of the FRS.

Annual Report, Board of Governors of the FRS.

Annual Report, FRB of New York. The other eleven Federal Reserve Banks also publish annual reports.

Annual Report, Comptroller of the Currency.

Annual Report, Secretary of the Treasury.

Annual Report, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Banking and Monetary Statistics, Board of Governors of the FRS, 1943.

Business Statistics (biennially), U.S. Dept. of Commerce.

National Income Supplement to the Survey of Current Business, latest edition 1954, U.S. Dept. of Commerce.

Economic Report of the President (annually in January), U.S. Government Printing Office.

Hearings on the Economic Report before the Joint Economic Committee (annually),

Monetary Policy and Management of the Public debt (Patman Committee documents), 3 vols.:

1. Hearings before the Subcommittee on General Credit Control and Debt Management of the Joint Committee on the Economic Report, 82d Congress, 1952

2. Replies to Questions and Other Material for the Use of the Subcommittee on General Credit Control and Debt Management, Part I, 82d Congress, 1952.

3. Replies to Questions and Other Material for the Use of the Subcommittee on General Credit Control and Debt Management, Part 2, 82d Congress, 1952.

Investigation of the Financial Condition of the United States, Hearings before the Senate Finance Committee, Parts 1, 2, and 3, 85th Congress, 1957.

United States Monetary Policy: Recent Thinking and Experience. Joint Committee of the Economic Report, 83d Congress, 1954.

Monetary Policy: 1955-56, Joint Economic Committee, 84th Congress, 1956.

Consumer Instalment Credit, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 1957.

B.H. Beckhart (ed.) Banking Systems (1955).

P.G. Fousek, Foreign Central Banking: The Instruments of Monetary Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1958.

[Reading Period: Ec. 141 Fall Term. No further assignment]

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003, Box 7, Folder “Economics, 1958-1959, (1 of 2)”.

___________________________

ECONOMICS 241
Money and Banking

Midterm Examination
January 22, 1959

I.

“At times short-term interest rates have been higher than long-term interest rates, while on other occasions long-term rates have been higher than short-term rates. Moreover, while short- and long-term rates usually move in the same direction, short-term rates ordinarily fluctuate over a wider range than long-term rates, but long-term security prices fluctuate more widely than short-term security prices.” Show how these patterns of behavior can be explained by the so-called expectational theory of the rate structure.

II.

“The sensitivity of output, employment, and prices to changes in the money supply may vary greatly depending upon the reaction coefficients of the economy and on the prevailing conditions.” Discuss.

III.

Proponents of the so-called “new monetary policy” have argued that even though expenditure schedules may be interest inelastic, restrictive monetary policy may be quite potent due to its effects on the supply of funds. Explain and evaluate their arguments, indicating some of the criticisms that have been advanced.

IV.

In principle at least, a given stabilization objective can be achieved by means of various combinations of monetary and fiscal measures. Taking an inflationary situation as your context, discuss the considerations, both theoretical and practical, which should be taken into account in choosing the optimal mix of stabilization policies.

V.

“If markets were reasonably competitive and prices correspondingly flexible, economic stability would be assured.” Discuss.

 

Source:  Harvard University Archives. Final Examinations, Social Sciences, January 1959. (HUC 7000.28) Vol. 122. Papers Printed for Final Examinations [in] History, Government, Economics,…, Naval Science, Air Science. January, 1959.

___________________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics
Economics 241

READING LIST NO. 1
Spring, 1959

Framework of Keynesian Analyis

A.P. Lerner, “The General Theory (1),” S.E. Harris, ed., The New Economics, Ch. 11.

J. Lintner, “The Theory of Money and Prices,” S.E. Harris, ibid., Ch. 37.

L. Tarshis, “An Exposition of Keynesian Economics,” R.V. Clemence, ed., Readings in Economic Analysis, Vol. I, pp. 197-208.

L.R. Klein, The Keynesian Revolution, Chs. 3 and 4.

The Consumption Function

J.M. Keynes, General Theory, Book III.
(NOTE: All assignments in the General Theory imply assignment of the corresponding passages in A.H. Hansen, A Guide to Keynes.)

R.P. Mack, “Economics of Consumption,” Survey of Contemporary Economics, Vol. II, pp. 39-78.

J.S. Duesenberry, Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, Ch. 3.

Irwin Friend, Individuals’ Saving, esp. Ch. 8.

M. Friedman, A Theory of the Consumption Function, Ch. 9 at least.

A. Marshall, Principles of Economics (8th edn.), pp. 228-236.

The Multiplier

G. Haberler, “Mr. Keynes’ Theory of the Multiplier,” Readings in the Theory of Business Cycles, Ch. 9.

F. Machlup, “Period Analysis and Multiplier Theory,” ibid., Ch. 10.

R.M. Goodwin, “The Multiplier,” The New Economics, Ch. 36.

G.L.S. Shackle, “Twenty Years On,” Ec. Journal, 61, June 1951.

Investment

J.M. Keynes, General Theory, Chs. 11, 12, 16.

A.P. Lerner, Economics of Control, Ch. 25.

I. Fisher, Theory of Interest, Chs. 5-11.

David Durand, “Costs of Debt and Equity Funds for Business,” Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, ed., Conference on Research in Business Finance, pp. 215-261, 328-330, 333-334.

Interest

J.M. Keynes, General Theory, Chs. 13, 14, 15, 17, 18.

A.P. Lerner, in The New Economics, Chs. 45, 46.

W. Fellner and H.M. Somers, “Alternative Monetary Approaches to Interest Theory,” Rev. of Ec. Stat., Feb. 1941.

B. Ohlin, “Some Notes on the Stockholm Theory of Saving and Investment,” Readings in Business Cycle Theory, Ch. 5.

F.A. Lutz, “The Outcome of the Saving-Investment Discussion,” ibid. Ch. 6.

J.M. Keynes, Economic Journal, 47 (1937), pp. 241-252, 663-669.

B. Ohlin, Economic Journal, 47 (1937), pp. 423-427.

R.W. Clower, “Productivity, Thrift and the Rate of Interest,” Economic Journal, March 1954.

S.C. Tsiang, “Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds Theories,” American Economic Review, September 1956.

F.A. Lutz, “The Structure of Interest Rates,” Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution, Ch. 26.

T. Wilson and P.W.S. Andrews, eds., Oxford Studies in the Price Mechanism, Ch. 1

Reading Period: Ec. 141 Spring Term

United States Monetary Policy: Its Contribution to Prosperity without Inflation (The American Assembly, Columbia University, 1958).

___________________________

ECONOMICS 241
Money and Banking

Final Examination
May 28, 1959

READ CAREFULLY: Answer Question 1 (40 points) and any three others (20 points each).

1.

Trace through in detail three of the following economic mechanisms, stating the special assumptions on which they rest:

  1. The manner in which an increase in the level of investment affects the level of income according to the period interpretation of the multiplier.
  2. The manner in which a decrease in wage rates affects the level of employment, according to Keynes.
  3. The manner in which an increase in the money supply leads to an increase in the price level without an increase in the interest rate, according to the “classical” doctrine.
  4. The manner in which an excess of ex ante investment over ex ante saving leads to a cumulative expansion, according to Ohlin and the Swedish school.
  5. The manner in which an excess of the warranted rate of growth over the natural rate of growth leads to chronic depression, according to Harrod.

2.

Explain in some detail the classical theory of investment, as exemplified by Fisher, and then spend most of your time on describing the defects and shortcomings of that theory.

3.

In what way does the theory of income determination employed by Hicks (or Modigliani, if you prefer) differ from Keynes? Explain in full detail the model of income determination used by Hicks or Modigliani, emphasizing (a) the technical devices employed and (b) the deficiencies of the model.

4.

Describe the consumption functions advocated by (a) Duesenberry (early), (b) Friedman, (c) Pigou (late) and discuss the implications of these various consumption functions (as contrasted with Keynes’) for an overall theory of income determination.

5.

Explain the “cost of capital” theory of investment (also called the “corporate investment approach”) and discuss its implications for an overall theory of income determination, as contrasted with the implications of the Fisher-Keynes theory.

6.

Write a belated book review of Keynes’ General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. In the course of it raise the major criticisms and objections that have been advanced by previous reviewers and commentators, and indicate how they affect your appraisal giving, of course, your reasons.

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Final examinations, 1853-2001. Box 27, Final Exams—Social Sciences-June, 1959. Papers Printed for Final Examinations [in] History, History of Religions,…, Economics,…Naval Science, Air Science. June, 1959.

Image Sources: Warren Smith (left) from the University of Michigan Faculty History Project. Robert Dorfman (right). AEA Distinguished Fellow 1992. The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 3 (Jun., 1993).