Category: M.I.T.

Categories
Exam Questions History of Economics M.I.T. Suggested Reading Syllabus

M.I.T. History of Economic Thought. Misc. Readings and exams. Samuelson, 1973-78

 

Scattered across several folders in the Paul Samuelson Papers at Duke are course materials from the graduate history of economic course regularly offered by Samuelson in the 1970s. Not included below are a few class lecture handouts and class lists also in the folders. Instead I have just transcribed the suggested reading lists or Dewey library course reserve lists and two final exams found in the folders. 

I did not take this course, once having sat in on a Marxian economics lecture that consisted of Paul Samuelson commenting on his textbook’s appendix “Rudiments of Marxian Economics”. Perhaps the arrogance of my youth got the better of me, but I thought there were other courses that were going to teach me something that I had not already learned so I am now condemned to trying to reconstruct his course content from such scraps as these we find in his archival record. Maybe a visitor to this page of Economics in the Rear-view Mirror has saved notes from the course?

_________________

14.132 FALL 1973
HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT
P. SAMUELSON

SUGGESTED READINGS

1. FOR BACKGROUND

T. Kuhn
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION

and parts or all of any sample of secondary sources, such as those by Roll, Gray, Gide-Rist, brief Schumpeter (1912), Heilbroner.

FOR BIOGRAPHY

Keynes
ESSAYS IN BIOGRAPHY

Schumpeter
TEN ECONOMISTS

H. Spiegel
GREAT ECONOMISTS ON GREAT ECONOMISTS

2. BASIC BACKGROUND REFERENCE

Perhaps the basic background reference is the posthumous, uneven classic:
J. S. Schumpeter
HISTORY OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

A valuable, MIT-graduate-school kind of reference is
Marc Blaug
ECONOMIC THEORY IN RETROSPECT

3. ON RICARDO, you should at least sample

Sraffa edition
PRINCIPLES

Useful readings are:

Blaug

Baumol
ch 2 in ECONOMIC DYNAMICS

Stigler in
HISTORY OF ECONOMICS

Sraffa
his introduction to the PRINCIPLES

Kaldor
his brief section in 1954 RES “Alternative Theories of Distribution”

Models of Ricardo-like systems

Pasinetti
Samuelson
Edelberg

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Paul Samuelson Papers, Box 33, Folder “14.132 Fall 1973”.

_________________

14.132 FALL 1974
HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT
P. SAMUELSON E 52-394

SUGGESTED READINGS

1. FOR BACKGROUND

T. Kuhn
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION

and parts or all of any sample of secondary sources, such as those by Roll, Gray, Gide-Rist, brief Schumpeter (1912), Heilbroner, Cannan, Recktenwald’s POLITICAL ECONOMY: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

FOR BIOGRAPHY

Keynes
ESSAYS IN BIOGRAPHY

Schumpeter
TEN ECONOMISTS

H. Spiegel
GREAT ECONOMISTS ON GREAT ECONOMISTS

2. BASIC BACKGROUND REFERENCE

Perhaps the basic background reference is the posthumous, uneven classic:
J. S. Schumpeter
HISTORY OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

A valuable, MIT-graduate-school kind of reference is
Marc Blaug
ECONOMIC THEORY IN RETROSPECT

3. First Topic of land and the interest rate: Turgot, Böhm-Bawerk and Keynes-Modigliani

Böhm-Bawerk, Vol I, Ch. 4
„Land and the Rate of Interest“: also Samuelson (1958, 1968, 1974)
Modigliani (1954, 1974)
Diamond (1965)

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Paul Samuelson Papers, Box 33, Folder “14.132 Fall 1973”.

_________________

14.132 Fall 1975
STORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT
P. A. SAMUELSON E52-394
FRIDAY 1:30-3:30

SUGGESTED READINGS

1. FOR BACKGROUND

Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolution
and parts or all of any sample of secondary sources, such as those by Roll, Gray, Gide-Rist, brief Schupeter (1912), Heilbroner, Cannan’s Review of Economic Theory, Recktenwald’s Political Economy: A Historical Perspective.

FOR BIOGRAPHY

Keynes, Essays in Biography

Schumpeter, Ten Economists

H. Spiegel, Great Economists on Great Economists [not in Dewey Library]

2. BASIC BACKGROUND REFERENCE

Perhaps the basic background reference is the posthumous, uneven classic:
J. A. Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis

A valuable, MIT-graduate-school kind of reference is
Mark Blaug, Economic Theory in Retrospect

For fruits of Marx’s hours in the British Museum, see
K. Marx, Theories of Surplus Value (many volumes, and sometimes called Vol. IV of Das Kapital)

Readable and scholarly essays are collected in
G. J. Stigler, Essays in the History of Economics

3. First topic of Quesnay’s Tableau Economique:

Any text like Gray, Peter Newman, Roll, Schumpeter;
Meek on Physiocracy, and edited volume;
A. Phillips, QJE, 1955;
S. Maital, QJE, 1972.

4. Topic of land and the interest rate: Turgot, Böhm-Bawerk and Keynes-Modigliani

Böhm-Bawerk, Vol I, Ch. 4, “Land and the Rate of Interest,” also,
Samuelson (1958, 1968, 1974)
Modigliani (1954, 1974)
Diamond (1965)

5. Modern model of Ricardo

6. Transformation problem of Marx

7. Smith, Adam

8. ….

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Paul Samuelson Papers, Box 33, Folder “14.132 Fall 1975”.

_________________

Samuelson
To be placed on reserve for 14.132

Mass. Inst. Tech.
FEB 14 1977
DEWEY RESERVE

McLellan. Karl Marx: His Life and Thought

Luxemburg. Accumulation of Capital

Sweezy. Theory of Capitalist Development

Robinson. An Essay on Marxian Economics

Dobbs. History of Theories of Distribution [sic, Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith: Ideology and Economic Theory]

Morishima. On Marxian Economics [sic, Marx’s Economics]

Schumpeter. History of Economic Analysis

Roll. History of Economic Thought 

Alexander Gray. The Development of Economic Doctrine

[Metzler Lloyd] Festschrift. (Trade, Stability and Macroeconomics) edited by G. Horowitz and P. Samuelson.

Reprints

Samuelson

Samuelson’s “Reply on Marxian Matters”

Insight and Detour in the Theory of Exploitation: A Reply to Baumol

Understanding the Marxian Notion of Exploitation: A Summary of the So-Called Transformation Problem Between Marxian Values and Competitive Prices

Marx as a Mathematical Economist

 

Journals

Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 2, 1934-35

American Economic Review, March 1938.

 

[Appendix: Rudiments of Marxian Economics (from Samuelson Economics, pp. 858-)]

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Paul Samuelson Papers, Box 33, Folder “14.132 Spring 1977”.

_________________

14.132 Final Exam
History of Economic Thought
P. A. Samuelson
May 20, 1977

ANSWER (1) OR (2) QUESTIONS.

  1. Describe any aspects of the classical economists’ system that primarily interests you.
  2. Describe the doctrines of some one historical economist or school in which you have an interest.
  3. Analyze any aspects of Marxian economics that you think are of relevance to economic history and policy.

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Paul Samuelson Papers, Box 33, Folder “14.132 Spring 1977”.

_________________

Reserve List, MIT Libraries
14.132 History of Economic Thought
Spring 1978

D. L. Thomson, Adam Smith’s Daughters, Exposition Press, 1973.

L. Robbins. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Macmillan, 1935 and 1962.

M. Blaug, Economic Theory in Retrospect. Richard D. Irwin, 1962.

I. H. Rima. Development of Economic Analysis. Irwin, 1972.

H. W. Spiegel,The Growth of Economic Thought. Prentice-Hall, 1971.

Alexander Gray, Development of Economic Doctrines. Longman, Green and Co. 1934.

T. W. Hutchinson, A Review of Economic Doctrines, 1870-1929. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1953.

Thomas Sowell, Classical Economics Reconsidered, Princeton U. Press, 1974.

Eric Roll, A History of Economic Thought. Faber and Faber, 1973.

Eric Roll, The World After Keynes, Praeger, 1968.

J. A. Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis. Oxford U. Press, 1954.

G. L. S. Shackle. The Nature of Economic Thought. Cambridge U Press, 1966.

J. A. Schumpeter, Ten Great Economists. Oxford, 1965.

R. L. Meek. Precursors of Adam Smith. Dear (London), 1973.

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Paul Samuelson Papers, Box 33, Folder “14.132 Spring 1978”.

_________________

14.132 Take-Home Exam
Spring 1978

Answer any one of these questions or any two or all three.

  1. Describe some topic covered in this course that you find to be of interest. Discuss its broad significance; or concentrate in depth on any aspect of the problem that you believe to be worth exploring. Do not hesitate to let your imagination soar.
  2. Describe some aspect or aspects of what we call neoclassical economics. If you wish, compare and contrast it with earlier classical economics; or with later Keynesian economics; or with the Marx-inspired economics that developed around the same time.
  3. Thomas Kuhn attempted to throw light on how the natural sciences tend to develop. If any part of his paradigms seems to you useful in any part of the history of economic thought, describe the use. If you have criticisms to make of the Kuhnian methodology, feel free to enlarge on them.

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Paul Samuelson Papers, Box 33, Folder “14.132 Spring 1977”.

Image Source:  Capture of the photos page from the Paul Samuelson memorial webpages at the MIT economics department (date of Wayback Machine capture May 22, 2011)

Categories
Exam Questions M.I.T. Suggested Reading Syllabus

M.I.T. Core Economic Growth and Dynamics. Readings and Final Exam. Solow, 1968

 

The reading list and examination questions for the “Economic Growth and Short-run Fluctuations” course taught by Robert Solow in the core graduate macro sequence has been posted earlier for 1966. There were many changes in the readings chosen between 1966 and 1968.

Solow’s 1973 course material for a later revised version (Growth and Capital Theory), that was moved to be the final course in the core macro sequence has also been posted.

Here a glimpse at what students thought about this course (as well as the other courses and instructors in the core theory courses, both micro and macro).

________________________

R.M. Solow
Spring 1968

READING LIST
14.452

As a background text you should have a copy of R.G.D. Allen, Macro-Economic Theory (Macmillan, 1967). For review, read Chapters 1, 3, 7, 8.

ECONOMIC GROWTH

  1. Factual Basis

Kendrick & Sato, “Factor Prices, Productivity and Growth”, American Economic Review, December 1963.
Bureau of the Census, Long-Term Economic Growth, 1860-1965  (This is an excellent compendium of time series. You should spend a few hours with it, and might like to buy a copy from Supt. of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402, $2.75)
Thurow & Taylor, “The Interaction between the Actual and Potential Rates of Growth,” Review of Economics and Statistics, November, 1966.

  1. One-Sector Real Theory

Allen, Chaps. 11, 14.
Hahn & Matthews, “The Theory of Economic Growth: A Survey”, Economic Journal, December 1964, Parts I, II except pp. 812-21.
Modigliani, “Comment” in Behavior of Income Shares (NBER), pp. 39-50.
(Optional: Johnson, “The Neo-Classical One-Sector Growth Model…,” Economica, August, 1966, pp. 265-79 only).

  1. Technical Progress

Allen, Chaps. 13, 15.
Solow et al., “Neoclassical Growth with Fixed Factor Proportions,” Review of Economic Studies, April 1966, pp. 27-89 only).

  1. One-Sector Monetary Theory

Tobin, “Money and Economic Growth”, Econometrica, October 1965.
Sidrauski, “Inflation and Economic Growth,” J.P.E., December, 1967.
Johnson, pp. 279-87 in article cited above.
See also Tobin-Johnson exchange in Economica, February, 1967.

  1. The Golden Rule and Optimal Growth

Marty, “The Neoclassical Theorem”, A.E.R., December 1964.
Diamond, “National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model”, A.E.R., December 1965, esp. pp. 1126-1135.
Koopmans, “Objectives, Constraints, and Outcomes in Optimal Growth Models,” Econometrica, January, 1967.

  1. Two (or more) Sector Real Theory

Hahn & Matthews, pp. 812-21.
Allen, Ch. 12.
(Optional: Shell & Stiglitz, “Allocation of Investment in a Dynamic Economy,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 1967).

  1. Income Flows in Long-Run

Thurow, “A Policy Planning Model of the American Economy,” dittoed.

SHORT-RUN FLUCTUATIONS

  1. Cyclical Mechanisms

Samuelson, “Interaction between Multiplier Analysis and the Principle of Acceleration”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1939, reprinted in A.E.A., Readings in Business Cycle Theory.
Metzler, “The Nature and Stability of Inventory Cycles”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1941.
Kaldor, “A Model of the Trade Cycle”, Economic Journal, 1940, reprinted in Hansen and Clemence, Readings in Business Cycles and National Income and in Kaldor, Essays on Economic Stability and Growth.

  1. Income Analysis Models

Klein, “The Econometrics of the General Theroy,” Ch. IX in The Keynesian Revolution, SECOND edition.
Okun, “Measuring the Impact of the 1964 Tax Reduction,” xerox.
Surte, “Forecasting and Analysis with an Econometric Model,” A.E.R., March, 1962.
De Leeuw & Gramlich, “The Federal-Reserve-MIT Econometric Model,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, January, 1968.

  1. Inflation

Johnson, “A Survey of Theories of Inflation,” in Essays in Monetary Economics.
Solow, “Recent Controversies in the Theory of Inflation,” dittoed.
Solow & Stiglitz, “Output, Employment and Wages in the Short Run,” dittoed.

________________________

FINAL EXAMINATION
14.452
May 23, 1968

Please answer each question in a separate examination booklet. Indicate on the front page of each booklet whether you are seeking only a grade in 14.452 or a grade in the general examination in economic theory. Those who seek only a grade in 14.452 should answer two questions in Part I and two questions in Part II. Those who are taking the general examination and economic theory should answer two questions in Part II and two in Part III.

Part I

  1. Construct a difference-equation model embodying the following assumptions:
    1. Consumption is a linear function of disposable income lagged one time-unit;
    2. Tax revenue is proportional to national product;
    3. Investment is the sum of a component proportional to the current change in consumption and the component proportional to national product lagged one time-unit;
    4. Imports are proportional to national product lagged one time-unit; exports constant;
    5. Government purchases are constant.

Write down formally the conditions for and an oscillatory response of the model to disturbance. When are the oscillations damped? How do variations in the tax rate affect these conditions? Suppose part of government purchases were made negatively proportional to the last observed change in national product?

  1. Why is technical progress an important part of the usual model of economic growth? Could increasing returns to scale play the same role? What is the special role of purely labor-augmenting (i.e. Harrod-neutral) technical progress?
  2. Imagine a planned economy choosing among steady states in the one-sector model, without technical progress. The planner values both consumption per head and capital per head (as a measure of national strength, say) and his preferences can be expressed by a system of conventionally-shaped indifference curves in consumption per head and capital per head.

Use this indifference map and the requirements for a steady state to show how the optimal steady-state is chosen. Prove that the optimal capital per head will exceed the “Golden-Rule” (maximal consumption per head) level. Show what happens to the optimal position if the rate of population growth increases. Discuss briefly the case of a one-time upward shift in the production function.

 

Part II

  1. In the generalized multiplier-accelerator model, the equation \frac{dK}{dt}=I\left( Y,K \right) means that “investment decisions are always carried out”, so that when I\left( Y,K \right)\ne S\left( Y \right) “unintended consumption or saving” occurs. Replace the above equation with \frac{dK}{dt}=S\left( Y \right), and interpret and analyze the resulting model. Compare its behavior with this with the case analyzed in class.
  2. Suppose I =I(Y,K) and S= S(Y) are the schedules of desired investment and saving. In what sense is (I-S) a measure of excess demand in the aggregate commodity market?
    How is it that no specific supply variables (labor force, for example) appear in this measure? Under what circumstances is it natural to suppose that \frac{dY}{dt} responds to (I-S)? (Y = real output, P = commodity price level). Under what circumstances is it natural to suppose that \frac{dP}{dt} responds to (I-S)?
  3. Consider it a one-sector non-monetary model of growth under the following assumptions:
    1. The production function in intensive form is q= Akb;
    2. The wages equal to the marginal product of labor;
    3. Investment demand is such that the after-tax return on capital is always at a target level r*;
    4. There is a tax on profits at rate t in the government spends all its revenue on consumption;
    5. The savings rates from wages and after-tax profits are both equal to a constant s.

Find the tax rate that will permit a steady-state at full employment. When will it be between zero and one? How does it change if this changes? Interpret.

  1. Considered a one-sector growth model, with two factors of production (capital and labor), constant returns to scale, and no technical progress. Suppose that the propensity to save out of profits and capital gains is equal to one, and the propensity to save out of wages and transfer payments (taxes = negative transfers) is zero.

Money, which is non-interest-bearing government debt, is the only alternative asset to capital. The desired money-capital ratio is of the form \frac{m}{k}=L\left( {f}'\left( k \right)+{{\left( {{\dot{p}}}/{p}\; \right)}^{e}} \right) where m is the real per capita stock of money,k is the capital-labor ratio, and {{\left( {{\dot{p}}}/{p}\; \right)}^{e}} is the expected rate of inflation which is equal to the actual rate \left( {{\dot{p}}}/{p}\; \right) in the steady-state.

  1. Government purchases are zero and the budget deficit, which is equal to the excess of transfers over taxes, is financed by issuing money.
    1. Describe the steady-state characteristics of the model.
    2. Find the rate of inflation that maximizes steady-state consumption per head.
    3. Suppose that {{\left( {{\dot{p}}}/{p}\; \right)}_{0}} is the rate of inflation in (b) that maximizes steady state consumption per head. Would a higher rate of inflation lead to a higher or lower long-run capital-labor ratio?

 

Part III

  1. Write a comprehensive essay on the subject of “The Problem of Weights in National Income and Index-Number Construction”.
    Explain the criteria which are used, should be used (for what purpose?) and why.
  2. Discuss the economic effects of an increase in the stock of money. Include an evaluation of the positions of several (not less than two) prominent economists familiar to you. How would you test the correctness of their positions?
  3. Discuss the effects of inflation on the level of real investment.

 

Source: Duke University, David M. Rubenstein Library. Economists’ Papers Archives. Papers of Robert M. Solow, Box 67, Folder “Exams”.

Image Source:  Robert Solow (right) from MIT Museum website.

Categories
Economists M.I.T. Yale

Yale. Economics Ph.D. alumnus (1939) and later high-ranking CIA official (Bay of Pigs). R. M. Bissell

 

Serendipity is always a dear and welcome companion when entering an archive, especially during initial visits. The archive in question for today is the digitized historical archive of the Yale Daily News that I decided to probe with the search-term “Keynes”. I was curious to see when the ideas of the General Theory might have received first mention in this student newspaper.

I was surprised to see that already in November 1936 the young instructor of economics, Richard M. Bissell, spoke to the Yale Government Forum on “The Intellectual Implications of Mr. J. M. Keynes”. Next, I looked to see what else I might find in the Yale Daily News about Bissell, and we see below that he certainly appears to have been inclined to raise the theoretical level of undergraduate economics instruction, including the application of formal mathematical models. The title of Bissell’s 1939 Yale Ph.D. dissertation was “The Theory of Capital under Static and Dynamic Conditions.”

Something else of interest that I stumbled upon is that Bissell was involved in the America First movement and even spoke at a rally held at Yale October 12, 1940 that featured guest speaker Charles A. Lindbergh. Serendipity enters the picture when I next discovered that at the February 14, 1941 rally opposing the Lend-Lease Bill featuring guest speaker Philip F. LaFollette, Kingman Brewster, Jr. (President of Yale, 1963-1977) was also a speaker. Academically, Kingman Brewster was an expert on anti-trust law and international commerce and a research associate in the economics department at M.I.T. in 1949-50.

But wait, there is more…

In 1954 Richard Bissell joined the CIA [Official biographical page for Bissell at CIA] where he was a champion of high-tech data collection as seen in the U-2 spy plane program and use of satellites for gathering data. His CIA career crashed and burned with the failure of the Bay of Pigs operation. [Richard Bissell—The Connecticut Yankee Behind the Bay of Pigs from the New England Historical Society]

_______________________

Richard M. Bissell Jr. Biographical Note
from the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library

Richard Mervin Bissell Jr. (September 18, 1909 – February 7, 1994) was born in Hartford, Connecticut in a home formerly owned by author Mark Twain. His parents were Richard Mervin Bissell Sr. (Vice President of the Hartford Fire Insurance Company) and Marie Truesdale (National Director of Volunteer Services for the American Red Cross.) In childhood he attended the Kingswood School in his former childhood home and later the Groton School in Massachusetts. He entered Yale in 1928 and graduated with an A.B. in history in 1932. After studying at the London School of Economics, Bissell earned a PhD in economics from Yale in 1939 and remained as an active assistant professor through October 1941 and went on leave until April 1942. During this period and throughout the rest of his life, Bissell would serve as a business consultant to a variety of professional concerns.

Bissell entered public life by joining the Department of Commerce as Chief Economic Analyst of the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce. He served in a variety of positions for federal agencies from 1942 until 1955 including the War Shipping Administration, the Office of War Mobilization and Reconversion, the Economic Cooperation Administration and the Mutual Security Agency. During this period Bissell returned to higher education as an associate professor (later professor) of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from 1946 until 1952. While at MIT, Bissell consulted for the Ford Foundation and authored “Notes on U.S. Strategy” following the preparation of National Security Council paper (NSC-141) on the allocation of resources to U.S. security programs. In writing the NSC paper, Bissell worked in conjunction with Frank Nash and Paul Nitze under the direction of the Secretary of State Dean Acheson, Secretary of Defense Robert Lovett, and Director of Mutual Security William Averell Harriman. Bissell described it in his autobiography as, “the Truman administration’s last will and testament on issues of national security.” Using what he had learned from authoring NSC-141, Bissell wrote “Notes on U.S. Strategy” which dealt with the international military, political, and economic policy of the United States in the atomic age.

Bissell joined the CIA in 1954 as Special Assistant to the Director. In 1959 he was made Deputy Director of Plans and remained so until he left the agency. Bissell was responsible for overseeing the U-2 program and the planning of the Bay of Pigs invasion among other projects. Bissell was offered a new position in the CIA following the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion that, in his estimation, amounted to a demotion. Faced with the prospect of having to accept a position he did not want, Bissell retired from federal service on February 28, 1962. Shortly afterwards he received the National Security Medal from President John F. Kennedy.

Bissell embarked on careers outside of the federal government following his departure from the CIA. He joined the Institute for Defense Analysis and eventually came to serve as president in July of 1962. The Institute of Defense Analysis (IDA) served (and continues to serve) as a federally-funded independent research organization responsive to the U.S. government on issues of national security. Bissell indicates in his autobiography that he encountered considerable obstacles and frustration in attempting to reshape IDA before he was eventually asked to resign. After carefully weighing his options and considering multiple opportunities, Bissell joined the United Aircraft Corporation in 1964 as director of Marketing and Planning. By his admission the work was not as stimulating as what he encountered in government service and he retired early in 1974. His UAC secretary, Francis T. Pudlo, left with him and continued to serve in the same capacity through the remainder of his life, eventually co-authoring his autobiography with Jonathan E. Lewis.

Bissell embarked on a variety of business consulting jobs after departing UAC both as an employee of others as well as a freelancer in his own right. In his final years he served as president of the Friends of Hill-Stead Museum and as treasurer of the board of directors of the Duncaster Life Care Center. He died in his home in Farmington Connecticut on February 7, 1994.

Bibliography:

Bissell, Richard M. Jr., with Jonathan E. Lewis and Frances T. Pudlo. Reflections of a Cold Warrior: From Yalta to the Bay of Pigs. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1996. [a review by H. Bradford Westerfield]

Biographical Chronology

September 18, 1909 Born in the Mark Twain House in Hartford, Connecticut
1916 – 1922 Kingswood School
1922 – 1928 Groton School
1928 – 1932 Yale University (A.B.)
1932 – 1933 London School of Economics
1934 Research assistant at Yale University
1935 – 1938 Instructor at Yale University
1936 – 1941 Economic Advisor to the Connecticut Public Utilities Commission
1937 – 1939 Consultant to Fortune magazine
1939 Ph.D. from Yale University
September 1939 – April 1942 Assistant Professor at Yale University (On leave from October 1941 to April 1942)
July 6, 1940 Married Ann Cornelia Bushnell
October 1941 – June 1942 Chief Economic Analyst, Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, Department of Commerce
April 1942 – June 1942 Assigned to the War Shipping Administration from the Department of Commerce
April 1942 – October 1942 Assistant to the Deputy Administrator, War Shipping Administration
October 1942 – July 1943 Director, Division of Economic Policy, War Shipping Administration
October 1942 – December 1945 Economist to the Combined Shipping Adjustment Board and Assistant to the Deputy Administrator, War Shipping Administration
July 1943 – December 1945 Director of Ship Requirements, War Shipping Administration
October 1944 – December 1945 Executive Officer of the Combined Shipping Adjustment Board, War Shipping Administration
March 1945 – December 1945 Secretary, Shipping Employment Policy, Committee of the United Maritime Authority, War Shipping Administration
December 1945 – March 1946 Economic advisor to director of Office of War Mobilization and Reconversion
March 1946 – September 1946 Deputy Director of Office of War

Mobilization and Reconversion
September 1946 – November 1946 Consultant to the Cosmopolitan Shipping Company
September 1946 – August 1947 Consultant to the United States Steel Corporation of Delaware
October 1946 – July 1948 Associate Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
April 1947 – July 1948 Consultant to Scudder, Stevens and Clark
June 1947 – July 1947 Consultant to the Coordinator of Exports
June 1947 – July 1948 Consultant to the Brightwater Paper Company
July 1947 – January 1948 Executive Secretary of the President’s

Committee on Foreign Aid (Harriman Committee)
January 1948 – July 1948 Consultant to the Asiatic Petroleum Company
February 1948 – July 1948 Consultant to the United States Steel Corporation of Delaware
February 1948 – July 1948 Consultant to the Gray and Rogers Advertising Agency
April 1948 Consultant, Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA)
May 1948 Assistant Deputy Administrator, Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA)
July 1948 – July 1952 Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
1949 Honorary M.A. degree, Yale University
June 1949 Assistant Administrator for Programs, Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA)
October 1950 – December 1951 Deputy Administrator, Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA)
December 30, 1951 – January 18, 1952 Deputy Director & Acting Director, Mutual Security Agency (MSA)
January 18, 1952 – January 1954 Consultant to the Ford Foundation and director of a research project through the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
September 29, 1952 – August, 22 1955 Consultant to the Director, Mutual Security Agency (MSA)
February 1, 1954 – January 2, 1959 Special Assistant to the Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
January 2, 1959 – February 28, 1962 Deputy Director of Plans, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
September 1961 – February 1962 Co-director of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)
March 1, 1962 Awarded National Security Medal by President John F. Kennedy
March 1, 1962 – July 1962 Executive Vice President, Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA)
July 1962 – September 1964 President, Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA)
September 1964 – September 1974 United Aircraft Corporation, Director of Marketing and Economic Planning
1965 – 1971 Regent, University of Hartford
1973 President of the Farmington Historical Society
1974 – 1976 Trustee, Mark Twain Memorial
1974 – 1977 Secretary of the Farmington Bicentennial Committee
1974 – 1981 Member, Board of Directors of Covenant Mutual and Covenant Life Insurance Company
1974 – 1994 Independent business consultant
1975 – 1981 Member, Board of Directors of the World Affairs Center
1980 – 1984 President, Friends of Hill-Stead Museum
1981 – 1988 Treasurer, Board of Directors of Duncaster Life Care Center
February 7, 1994 Died in his home in Farmington, Connecticut

Source:  Dwight Eisenhower Library. Papers of Richard Bissell. Finding Aid.

_______________________

Bissell Addresses Government Forum
Government Must Regulate Usury, Says Economist
(November 17, 1936)

Richard M. Bissell, 1928 [sic, class of 1932 is correct], instructor of economics, addressed the Government Forum in the Hall of Graduate Studies last night. His subject was “The Intellectual Implications of Mr. J. M. Keynes,” which resolved itself into an interpretation of Mr. Keynes’ theories and the delineation of his conceptions of ideal economic government.

Mr. Bissell illustrated the trade cycle, as applied to the recent depression. “In the boom years there was extensive investment; gradually, however, the more flagrant holes in the producing equipment of the nation were filled in, and there was a great slackening in the demand for capital. The rate of interest for borrowing money, however, continued at the same standard.”

Depression Ended Itself

“With the falling off of investment,” he went on, “there was a falling off in the demand for consumers’ goods, and the effect became cumulative. But the depression brought itself to an end. The goods bought before the onset of the depression wore out, and new products were invented all of which stimulated investment.”

“The government must see to it,” said Mr. Bissell, “that the rate of interest falls when the demand for capital falls; but in emergencies when this is an insufficient stimulating force, the government itself must invest. It should deliberately plan upon an unbalanced budget.

“In the ideal government,” the speaker concluded, “in which the rate of interest were completely controlled by the state, in the course of 20 years’ investment most of the opportunities for profitable borrowing would be used up, and the rate of interest would of course continue to fall with the demand for capital. The eventual rate would probably be under one per cent, a situation which would do away with many of the evils of capitalism resulting from usury.”

Source: The Yale Daily News (November 17, 1936), pp. 1, 3.

_______________________

Announcement
(May 6, 1936)

Meeting of the Undergraduate Math Club. “Mr. Richard Bissell will speak on ‘The nature of the applications of mathematics to economics.’”

Source: Yale Daily News, May 6, 1936 p. 8.

_______________________

Letter to the editor
(May 14, 1938)

To the Chairman of the News.
Dear Sir:

The alumni have recently been receiving communications about new blood in undergraduate teaching. I want to put in a word on the economics department, which I think has a large hole in it, although it is the selection of such a large group for majors.

The department at Yale has excellent men on various select subjects, public control, railroads, international policy, banking, and supplementary Sheff courses in statistics and so forth. The integration of these courses however leaves much to be desired. Mr. Bissell teaches Theory, but apparently his course is for the select few; and the theory taught in the regular course is so weak and sparse that the institutional study of railroad rates etc., is far more valuable. Since the days of Irving Fisher, Yale has had no one teaching undergraduates with an up to date broad view of society.

The average undergraduate, I believe, goes through an economic major with only the sketchiest idea of theory to hang his facts upon; he regards the work of Keynes, Hawtrey, Pigou, Robbins and Cassell as graduate work. Rarely does Yale economics teach one to read these people intelligently. The size of their field is beyond the reach of static pictures, where demand is given, and purchasing power is discussed three weeks later. All Cambridge undergraduates are taught to criticize these men, perhaps at the expense of institutional knowledge, but I think they get more fun out of economics.

Someone is needed at Yale to teach a course in general theory as apart from distribution, and money as apart from banking alone (lack of broad training is partly what makes Mr. Rogers’ seem difficult), someone who knows geometry and calculus and can simplify theories enough to throw them at current problems to keep the work thrilling…

Very sincerely,

Carter C. Higgins,
Class of 1937

Source: The Yale Daily News (May 14, 1938), pp. 2, 3.

Image Source:  The Yale Daily News (February 14, 1941), p. 1.

 

Categories
Berkeley Carnegie Institute of Technology Chicago Cornell Duke Economics Programs Harvard Illinois Indiana Iowa Johns Hopkins M.I.T. Michigan Minnesota Northwestern NYU Ohio State Pennsylvania Princeton Stanford UCLA Vanderbilt Wisconsin Yale

Economics Departments and University Rankings by Chairmen. Hughes (1925) and Keniston (1957)

 

The rankings of universities and departments of economics for 1920 and 1957 that are found below were based on the pooling of contemporary expert opinions. Because the ultimate question for both the Hughes and Keniston studies was the relative aggregate university standing with respect to graduate education, “The list did not include technical schools, like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the California Institute of Technology, nor state colleges, like Iowa State, Michigan State or Penn State, since the purpose was to compare institutions which offered the doctorate in a wide variety of fields.” Hence, historians of economics will be frustrated by the conspicuous absence of M.I.T. and Carnegie Tech in the 1957 column except for the understated footnote “According to some of the chairmen there are strong departments at Carnegie Tech. and M.I.T.; also at Vanderbilt”.

The average perceived rank of a particular economics department relative to that of its university might be of use in assessing the negotiating position of department chairs with their respective university administrations. The observed movement within the perception league tables over the course of roughly a human generation might suggest other questions worth pursuing. 

Anyhow without further apology…

______________________

About the Image: There is no face associated with rankings so I have chosen the legendary comedians Bud Abbott and Lou Costello for their “Who’s on First?” sketch.  YouTube TV version; Radio version: Who’s on First? starts at 22:15

______________________

From Keniston’s Appendix (1959)

Standing of
American Graduate Departments
in the Arts and Sciences

The present study was undertaken as part of a survey of the Graduate School of the University of Pennsylvania in an effort to discover the present reputation of the various departments which offer programs leading to the doctorate.

A letter was addressed to the chairmen of departments in each of twenty-five leading universities of the country. The list was compiled on the basis of (1) membership in the Association of American Universities, (2) number of Ph.D.’s awarded in recent years, (3) geographical distribution. The list did not include technical schools, like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the California Institute of Technology, nor state colleges, like Iowa State, Michigan State or Penn State, since the purpose was to compare institutions which offered the doctorate in a wide variety of fields.

Each chairman was asked to rate, on an accompanying sheet, the strongest departments in his field, arranged roughly as the first five, the second five and, if possible, the third five, on the basis of the quality of their Ph.D. work and the quality of the faculty as scholars. About 80% of the chairmen returned a rating. Since many of them reported the composite judgment of their staff, the total number of ratings is well over 500.

On each rating sheet, the individual institutions were given a score. If they were rated in order of rank, they were assigned numbers from 15 (Rank 1) to 1 (Rank 15). If they were rated in groups of five, each group alphabetically arranged, those in the top five were given a score of 13, in the second five a score of 8, and in the third five a score of 3. When all the ratings sheets were returned, the scores of each institution were tabulated and compiled and the institutions arranged in order, in accordance with the total score for each department.

To determine areas of strength or weakness, the departmental scores were combined to determine [four] divisional scores. [Divisions (Departments): Biological Sciences (2), Humanities (11), Physical Sciences (6), Social Sciences (5)]….

… Finally, the scores of each institution given in the divisional rankings were combined to provide an over-all rating of the graduate standing of the major universities.

From a similar poll of opinion, made by R. M. Hughes, A Study of the Graduate Schools of America, and published in 1925, [See the excerpt posted here at Economics in the Rear-view Mirror] it was possible to compile the scores for each of eighteen departments as they were ranked at that time and also to secure divisional and over-all rankings. These are presented here for the purpose of showing what changes have taken place in the course of a generation.

The limitations of such a study are obvious; the ranks reported do not reveal the actual merit of the individual departments. They depend on highly subjective impressions; they reflect old and new loyalties; they are subject to lag, and the halo of past prestige. But they do report the judgment of the men whose opinion is most likely to have weight. For chairmen, by virtue of their office, are the men who must know what is going on at other institutions. They are called upon to recommend schools where students in their field may profitably study; they must seek new appointments from the staff and graduates of other schools; their own graduates tum to them for advice in choosing between alternative possibilities for appointment. The sum of their opinions is, therefore, a fairly close approximation to what informed people think about the standing of the departments in each of the fields.

 

OVER-ALL STANDING
(Total Scores)

1925

1957

1.

 Chicago

1543

1.

 Harvard

5403

2.

 Harvard

1535

2.

 California

4750

3.

 Columbia 1316 3. Columbia 4183
4. Wisconsin 886 4. Yale

4094

5.

 Yale 885 5. Michigan 3603
6. Princeton 805 5. Chicago

3495

7.

 Johns Hopkins 746 7. Princeton 2770
8. Michigan 720 8. Wisconsin

2453

9.

 California 712 9. Cornell 2239
10. Cornell 694 10. Illinois

1934

11.

 Illinois 561 11. Pennsylvania 1784
12. Pennsylvania 459 12. Minnesota

1442

13.

 Minnesota 430 13. Stanford 1439
14. Stanford 365 14. U.C.L.A.

1366

15.

 Ohio State 294 15. Indiana 1329
16. Iowa 215 16. Johns Hopkins

1249

17.

 Northwestern 143 17. Northwestern 934
18. North Carolina 57 18. Ohio State

874

19.

 Indiana 45 19. N.Y.U. 801
20. Washington

759

 

ECONOMICS

1925

1957
1. Harvard 92 1. Harvard

298

2.

 Columbia 75 2. Chicago 262
3. Chicago 65 3. Yale

241

4.

 Wisconsin 63 4. Columbia 210
5. Yale 42 5. California

196

6.

 Johns Hopkins 39 5. Stanford 196
7. Michigan 31 7. Princeton

184

8.

 Pennsylvania 29 8. Johns Hopkins 178
9. Illinois 27 9. Michigan

174

10.

 Cornell 25 10. Minnesota 96
11. Princeton 23 11. Northwestern

70

12.

 California 22 12. Duke 69
13. Minnesota 20 13. Wisconsin

66

14.

 Northwestern 18 14. Pennsylvania 45
15. Stanford 17 15. Cornell

32

16.

 Ohio State 15 16. U.C.L.A.

31

According to some of the chairmen there are strong departments at Carnegie Tech. and M.I.T.; also at Vanderbilt.

 

Source:  Hayward Keniston. Graduate Study and Research in the Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania (January 1959), pp. 115-119,129.

 

 

Categories
Funny Business M.I.T.

M.I.T. Robert Solow’s last skit “Dr. Rudi Tells You How”, late 1980s

 

 

The following skit by Robert Solow has been transcribed from his original handwritten text in the Economists Papers Archive at Duke University and shared with Economics in the Rear-View Mirror by Roger Backhouse.

It is identified in its upper-right hand corner on the first page as “Solow’s Last Skit”. The manuscript bears no date, but there are two clues that point to its having been written sometime in the late 1980’s.

  • The short-lived currency unit of Argentina, the Austral [b. June 15, 1985; d. December 31, 1991], is mentioned at the end of the skit.
  • The late 1980s also marked the heyday of the petite radio and television therapist, Dr. Ruth Westheimer, who spoke with a charming German accent about issues surrounding sexual health. One supposes nothing could have been more or less natural than imagining Rudiger Dornbusch, born in Krefeld, Germany, to be the Dr. Rudi dispensing professional advice to fellow economists.

Robert Solow has received much ribbing for the following remark from his 1966 “Comments.” Guidelines: Informal Controls and the Market Place, eds. George P. Shultz and Robert Z. Aliber. Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 62-66.

“…everything reminds Milton [Friedman] of the money supply. Well, everything reminds me of sex, but I try to keep it out of my papers”.

Now read the text below and you will see that Robert Solow was definitely no prude when it came to joking about economists (still clearly “A Man’s World”):

  • “Ed Presspott”: time inconsistency as analogue to hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD);
  • “Dr. Rudi”: not consistently overshooting (I apologize if you cannot unread this);
  • “Bob Barrell”: completely predictable routine, needing to spice up his act;
  • “Tom Corporal”: obsessed with finding the right technique;
  • “Larry Winters” as a compulsively promiscuous co-author.

From a comment left (15 Feb 2022) at Tyler Cowen’s Assorted Links (includes this post).

“I attended that skit party! Stan Fischer played Bob Barrel, and Jeff Wooldridge played Tom Corporal.”

_______________________

Solow’s Last Skit

Doctor Rudi Tells You How

(A) We present, in person, the world-famous author of the best-selling book “How to Repudiate Your Debts and Blame the Lender.” Dr. Rudi has been telling people how to run their—NO, NOT WHAT YOU EXPECTED—how to run their professional lives ever since he discovered that they would pay to listen. For a happy, uninhibited professional life, for fun-filled trips to Rio, for the pleasure of striking terror into the hearts of international bankers and making them pay, just listen to Dr. Rudi. Remember that Dr. Rudi swings like a pendulum do. Now for our first seeker after help with his professional life. Please state your name.

(P) [Edward C. Prescott] I’m Ed Presspott.

(R) And what is your problem, Mr. Presspott. Don’t be shy. Dr. Rudi has heard everything. Nothing shocks him.

(P) I feel so ashamed. I can barely bring myself to look in the mirror.

(R) Ah, you look in the mirror. The mirror is in the ceiling, no doubt?

(P) No, my regular shaving mirror, in the medicine cabinet.

(R) In the medicine cabinet? That’s a brand new one. Even Dr. Rudi has never heard of that before. There is no end to perversion. How does he get that mirror off his ceiling and into the medicine cabinet? Must ask [Stanley Fischer] Dr. Stan. Well, then, Mr. Presspott, why are you ashamed to look into the mirror—chuckle, chuckle,–that you keep in the medicine cabinet?

(P) I’m dynamically inconsistent. I didn’t think I could bring myself to say it. You’re wonderful, Dr. Rudi. Yes, let’s face it, I’m dynamically inconsistent.

(R) All the time?

(P) Yes. No. Yes. No. A lot, anyway. It just comes over me.

(R) You better tell me about it. Everything. Hold nothing back.

(P) Take last week. Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday were just routine. Of course my tastes and technology changed a couple of times, the way they always do. I adjusted, the way I always do. Kept the old markets cleared, the old prices flexible. Told everyone I was going to the movies on Thursday. Seemed like the best thing to do. Really did. Often go to the movies on Thursday. I really do. I really do. I really do. No, I don’t. I’ve got to tell someone, Dr. Rudi. I don’t go to the movies on Thursday. I don’t really go to the movies. Hardly ever. Somehow on Thursday I don’t feel like going to the movies. On Monday it seemed like the best thing to do. So I told everyone I would. But most Thursdays, I don’t know, it just comes over me that going to the movies might not be the best thing to do after all. Sometimes I make myself go, but most of the time I don’t. I know it’s wrong, but I don’t go. I’ve never told this to anyone before, Dr. Rudi, not even to [Finn Kydland] Kid Finland.

(R) So when you don’t go to the movies on Thursday, what do you do? I have to know if I’m going to help you.

(P) I just sit there in a sweat, even though it’s Minneapolis at 200° below zero. I just sit there in a sweat and worry about what the other people are thinking.

(R) Maybe they don’t know.

(P) Of course they know. It’s common knowledge. I can practically hear them whispering that old Presspot has lost his dynamic consistency. And they laugh, they laugh. I even tried telling them on Monday that I wouldn’t go to the movies on Thursday. But you know how it is, on Monday morning, with all that market clearing ahead of me, I really feel like going to the movies on Thursday. How do I know what I’ll feel like on Thursday? Help me, Dr. Rudi, help me.

(R) You just have to stop feeling guilty, Pressport. Lost of people are dynamically inconsistent. Even Dr. Rudi. Do you think I overshoot every time? Of course not. Sometimes I just can’t be bothered to overshoot. Dynamic consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds as dear Ralph Waldo Mundell used to say. No guilt, Presspott. No guilt. If it feels good, it feels good. Render unto Thursday what is Thursdays, as Jesus Mundell used to say. No guilt.

(P) Thank you, Dr. Rudi, thank you. I feel better already.

(R) And one more thing, Presspott.

(P) Yes, Dr. Rudi?

(R) Get that mirror out of the medicine cabinet and back on the ceiling where it belongs. Next client, please.

(A) You, sir, you look troubled. What is your name?

(B) [Robert Barro] Barrel, Bob Barrel, and I am sorely troubled.

(A) Tell it to Dr. Rudi, Barrel. You’re as good as cured.

(R) Let it hang out, Barrel. Well, maybe it would be better if you just told me about your problem.

(B) It’s simple. Dr. Rudi. Everything I do is anticipated. I am so predictable that everything I do is anticipated by everyone. Well, you know what happens.

(R) What happens?

(B) Nothing. That’s the problem of course. Nothing real happens. I’m death[?] on the price level, of course, but there’s no fun in that. Anyone can screw up the price level. I want to do something real.

(R) Sneak up on them. Barrel. Surprise them.

(B) I’ve tried. I wait until the last minute and then I try something completely out of character. Sometimes I smile, or make a joke. But nothing real happens. Nominal, nominal, nominal. So then I ask people on the street: how come nothing real happened? Didn’t I do something surprising? And they all say the same thing: We figured you would try to do something unanticipated, so we were waiting. You’re lucky you even have a nominal effect, Barrel. You’re predictable, Barrel, predictable. Before I can even say I resent that, they say you resent that. It’s obscene.

(R) No, it’s not obscene, Barrel. Nothing is obscene. Everything is OK. It’s OK to be predictable. It’s OK to be boring. It’s OK to be sober. Sometimes even the great Mundell is…boring. Maybe your grandchildren will be unpredictable.

(B, R together)  B: I’ve already taken them fully into account.
R: You’ve already taken them fully into account.

(B) See what I mean. Am I doomed to leave no real effects behind me?

(R) Yes (Thank God). You must learn not to care. Think nominal. Nominal is beautiful. Real is ugly. Real is Keynesian.

(B, R together)  There are no Keynesians.

(R) Stick with the price level, my boy, and the price level will stick with you. And one more thing—

(B) Yes, Dr. Rudi?

(R) No more boring predictable papers, please. Next sufferer.

(A) Here is a lost-looking soul. What is your name, sir, and are you seeking advice from Dr. Rudi?

(C) [Thomas Sargent] Corporal is my name, Tom Corporal. Science is my game. But yes, I have a bit of a problem. I’m sure there’s a theorem somewhere that will take care of it. If worst comes to worst we can always change the problem.

(R) Tell Dr. Rudi about it.

(C) Well, I might as well. I told you that science is my game. Control theory. Stochastic processes. See a sum of squares, minimize it.

(R) Small is beautiful as good old Kurt[?] Mundell used to say.

(C) Never heard of him, but if he was a minimizer he was OK.

(R) So what is the problem?

(C) Learn a new technique every month.

(R) Every month! What do you need me for?

(C) It’s my life. I perfect my technique. I am obsessed with doing it right, exactly right. I bring all my technique to bear on it, and I find I can’t do it at all.

(R) Well, this sounds more like my kind of problem.  Not at all, eh?

(C) Oh I turn out the papers and the books all right. But nobody believes any of it. Neither do I. I try to work up some conviction.

(R) Conviction is better than guilt, as old Judge Mundell used to say. You gotta have conviction.

(C) Sometimes I can’t even work up a simple declarative sentence. But at least I’m doing it right.

(R) I thought you weren’t doing it at all.

(C) Maybe it’s the same thing. Anyway, I have another math book at home and I bet the key to the universe is in it somewhere. If I could only find a well-posed question I’m sure I could find a well-posed answer.

(R) My boy, listen to Dr. Rudi. One or two techniques is all you need. The great Mundell got by with no technique at all. Solow with even less.

(C) You mean it’s done with mirrors?

(R) On the ceiling, yes.

(C) Angle of incidence equals angle of reflection, eh.

(R) Any angle you like, Tom baby. Forget the technique and start to believe. That will get their attention. And then…

(C) And what then, Dr. Rudi?

(R) Tell them to repudiate their debts and blame the lenders.

(C) I believe, Dr. Rudi, I believe.

(R) But stay out of Brazil and Argentina, that’s my territory.

(C) It’s the Austro-Hungarian Empire for me. Wait till I tell [Neil Wallace] Neil.

(R) Next sinner, please.

(A) Here is a distinguished looking gentleman. Dr. Rudi rarely sees patients who seem so self-possessed yet so youthful. Sir, it is hard to believe that you have any problem at all, let alone the sort of thing that Dr. Rudi could help you with. What is your name, Sir?

(W) [Larry Summers] Larry Winters, but don’t ask me to spell it. Spelling is not my thing.

(A) Ah you don’t have to spell it. Everyone knows Larry Winters. But surely you don’t have any problems. When could you squeeze them in?

(W) Well, I’d rather talk to Dr. Rudi.

(R) Come in, tell me in complete confidence what brings you here. No one will know but our world-wide audience.

(W) Dr. Rudi, to tell you the truth I can’t stop writing. Every day I write like one possessed. Since January 1 I have written 89 articles and that doesn’t count National Bureau Working Papers. I don’t even have time to think.

(R) Ah, so you have discovered the Fundamental Secret?

(W) You mean that you don’t have to think in order to write?

(R) So wise, so young!

(W) I learned it from my teachers.

(R) Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach.

(W) Those who can’t teach, teach economics.

(R) You know that too?

(W) I learned it from my teachers.

(R) So you can’t stop writing. Compulsive promiscuity. As the late Dr. Sigmund Mundell said, the sins of the children are visited upon the fathers. Perhaps it was not Mundell. Perhaps it is not even true. Have you tried to understand this compulsion? The famous Bishop Mundell used to say that when he felt the impulse to write he would lie down until it went away.

(W) When I lie down I just keep writing.

(R) We must locate the source of this compulsion. Think.

(W) No time.

(R) What do your friends say about this? Sometimes they have insights denied to oneself.

(W) Some of them think I’m trying to catch up with [Martin Feldstein] Feldstein. Some of them think I’m trying to stay ahead of [N. Gregory Mankiw] Mankiw.

(R) You see—those are both difficult but sound objectives. I myself try mostly to emulate the great Gustave Mundell who always wrote one chapter before and another chapter after.

(W) Before and after what?

(R) What a pleasant surprise for you when you find out.

(W) Must go. I have three NBER Working Papers to finish today.

(R) But if we talked some more, I might find a way to cure you of this obsession.

(W) Cure? I don’t want to be cured. I like writing.

(R) But then why did you come to see Dr. Rudi?

(W) I thought we might get a joint paper out of it.

(A) And so we come to the end of another session with Dr. Rudi. If you have a question you would like to put to Dr. Rudi, write it down and send it to this station together with 5 billion Austral [Argentinian currency unit between June 15, 1985 and December 31, 1991], or better yet a box top, any box top. Thank you for your support.

 

Source:  Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Papers of Robert M. Solow. Box 83.

Image Sources:  Robert Solow from the Library of Economics and Liberty; Rudiger Dornbusch from FAZ, April 12, 2014; Dr. Ruth Westheimer from the Encyclopedia of Jewish Women.

Categories
Exam Questions M.I.T.

M.I.T. International Economics examinations. Kindleberger, 1950-51

Charles Kindleberger, ca 1950

 

From the middle of the twentieth century and for the entire pre-Bhagwati and pre-Dornbusch years, Charles P. Kindleberger taught international economics to M.I.T. graduate students. This post provides the midterm and final examinations from the 1950-51 academic year.

Note: The final examination for 14.581 that I have transcribed below comes with no date, though from the file it is clearly a reworked version of the exam for Ec 59 (the earlier course number) dated January 28, 1949. This version of the exam with handwritten corrections is next to the hourly exam from November 1950 in the archive folder which makes it seem likely to correspond to the exam for January, 1951 (but there is a gap for final exams in 14.581 from 1950-1953 so we can’t be really certain).

________________

Course Announcement

14.581, 14.582. International Economics. [Kindleberger] The foreign exchange market, foreign trade and commercial policy, with emphasis on the relation of the items in the current account to national income; international finance and the achievement and maintenance of equilibrium in the balance of payments as a whole: current problems of international economics.

Source: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Catalogue Issue for 1950-1951 Session (June 1950), pp. 135, 170.

________________

14.581 Hour Test
Prof. Kindleberger

11:00 a.m., Tuesday,
November 14, 1950

Define; sketch briefly the content of; and discuss the present usefulness of the following three concepts in international trade and exchange:

(15 minutes)

  1. The purchasing power parity doctrine.

 

(20 minutes)

  1. The doctrine of comparative costs

 

(15 minutes)

  1. The foreign-trade multiplier

Source:  MIT Archives. Charles Kindleberger Papers, Box 22, Folder “Examination 14.481, 1949-1966.”

________________

Scheduled Examination in
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS 14.581
[undated, possibly January, 1951]

NOTE: Students are not permitted to use any books, notebooks or papers in this examination. If brought into the room they must not be left on the desks.

ANSWER ANY EIGHT

  1. Assume that the currency of country A is under speculative attack. Under what circumstances should the monetary authorities in A encourage or discourage interest arbitrage between the spot and futures markets?
  2. What are the effects of undervaluation of a country’s currency on exports, imports, prices, income and terms of trade?
  3. Describe how trade can substitute for factor movements. Since trade can so substitute, how do you account for the fact that trade flourishes more between industrial countries, which have different factors in roughly the same proportions, than between industrial and agricultural countries?
  4. A report of the European Council set up under the Marshall plan stated that

“Even though American productivity is much greater per capita than Europe’s, the Europeans should be able to compete with American industry in its own market in branches where American productivity exceeds that of Europe by only 50 to 100 percent, for example.”

Discuss the implications of this remark, in terms of the doctrine of comparative advantage, for as many aspects of the comparison between the American and European economies as are relevant.

  1. How does the foreign-trade multiplier vary with the propensities abroad to save and to import? What difference is made in your answer if the country concerned is the United States or Switzerland?
  2. What happened to the terms of trade between Western Europe and the rest of the world between 1900 and 1938? Why?
  3. In making balance-of payments estimates, what are the ways one can treat payments to domestic shipowners for carriage of exports and imports respectively? How are these various ways to be reconciled for each of exports and imports?
  4. Which of the following explanations of the recent troubles faced by the Waltham Watch Company do you favor?

BOSTON HERALD editorial

“…The Swiss product (jeweled watches) enjoyed a competitive advantage despite the existing low American tariff because of much higher American tariff because of much higher American labor costs….”

Letter of Mr. Harold T. Partridge to the Boston Herald, published January 1, 1949:

“We can blame if we wish the Hurlburts of Elgin, the Millers of Hamilton and the Fitches of Waltham, who at the time of the writing of the Paine-Aldrich tariff bill (1909) employed their own lawyer, Mr. Romney Spring, to write that part of the bill pertaining to the entry of watches into this country. At that time there should have been…the establishment of a system of horological engineering such as is employed by the Swiss….”

  1. Are you inclined to support or oppose renewal of the international wheat agreement? Explain its advantages and disadvantages from the short- and long-run for wheat farmers, the United States as a whole, the world.
  2. The Economist favors discriminatory import restrictions and opposes multiple exchange rates. Aside from the special problem of sterling cross-rates, is this position logical? Attack or defend it.

Source:  MIT Archives. Charles Kindleberger Papers, Box 22, Folder “Examination 14.481, 1949-1966.”

________________

14.582 Hour Test

11:00 a.m.
Thursday, April 5, 1951

BOTH QUESTIONS HAVE EQUAL WEIGHT.

  1. Describe in great detail a hypothetical case of transfer of an autonomous long-term capital inflow and refer specially to the following:

commercial banks
central banks
gold movements
movements of short-term capital
multiplier
accelerator
marginal propensities to import, invest
short and long-term rates of interest
terms of trade
current account balance

  1. Discuss the various possible impacts of the industrialization process on foreign trade:
    1. of the industrializing country
    2. of the rest of the world.

Source:  MIT Archives. Charles Kindleberger Papers, Box 22, Folder “Examination 14.482, 1951-1976.”

________________

Scheduled Examination in
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC—14.582

Monday, May 28, 1951
Time: 1:30-4:30 P.M.

NOTE: Students are not permitted to use any books, notebooks or papers in this examination. If brought into the room they must not be left on the desks.

Answer questions 1 or 2 (one hour), and three of the remaining five questions (40 minutes each).

  1. Define equilibrium in the international economic position of a country. Illustrate what is implied in this definition in terms of (a) the relevant variables (such as foreign exchange rate, national income, terms of trade, etc.), and (b) departures from it.

or

  1. Classical economic theory assumed that the factors of production, including capital, were immobile internationally, and that an equilibrium system could be maintained despite this fact, by means of the law of comparative advantage and the gold standard mechanism (or the paper standard). Do you agree that this is true or are capital movements, at least, necessary? Explain.

……………………….

  1. Discuss the purposes of two of the following international economic institutions and their effectiveness in terms of these purposes:
    1. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    2. The Organization for European Economic Cooperation
    3. The European Payments Union
  2. Compare and contrast the Exchange Equalization Account (U.K.) and the American Stabilization Fund.
  3. What role may and should direct investment play in the economic development of underdeveloped areas?
  4. Comment fully on the cure for the economic difficulties faced by Europe in 1946-48: “Halt the inflation and adjust the exchange rate.”
  5. Short-term capital movements may give rise to and/or may substitute for gold movements. Discuss the processes involved.

 

Source:  MIT Archives. Charles Kindleberger Papers, Box 22, Folder “Examination 14.482, 1951-1976.”

Image Source: Charles P. Kindleberger from the MIT yearbook, Technique 1950.

Categories
Funny Business M.I.T.

M.I.T. Faculty skit. Robert Solow as the 2000 year old economist.

Would Mel Brooks' famous 2,000-Year-Old Man have understood modern language? Researchers say there's a possibility.

 

 

A skit in economics typically involves a humor transplant of some sort. The following script from the faculty contribution to an annual M.I.T. economics skit party (ca.  1979-80 which is when Luis Tiant pitched for the Yankees) took its inspiration from  two greats in American comedy, Carl Reiner & Mel Brooks, who sometimes performed as interviewer and 2,000 year-old man, respectively.

While it is fairly clear that Robert Solow performed and probably wrote the entire skit, the identity of the interviewer still needs to be established. Hint: there is a comment box at the bottom of this post. 

The script comes from a file of such Solovian skits that Roger Backhouse has copied during his archival research and has shared with Economics in the Rear-View Mirror.

_________________

 

Q: You have probably all heard the interviews with the recently discovered 2000-year-old man. We are fortunate to have with us tonight another great find, the 2000-year-old economist, Robert M. Solow. By the way, Dr. Solow, just what does the M stand for?

A: Methuselah, dummy.

Q: Dr. Solow has seen so many skit parties in his life, that he was not very happy about appearing at this one. Do you remember the first skit party you ever went to?

A: No. Skit parties are like hangovers – best thing to do is forget ’em and swear never to do it again. I do have a hazy recollection of an early skit party, I think it was what the one where I first heard the joke about bordered determinants…

Q: What is the joke about border determinants?

A: I don’t know, but they sure laugh[ed] their fool heads off.

Q: Any other recollections about that skit party?

A: Well, you could hear them building pyramids in the background, I remember, and there was this Sphinx-like object, looked a lot like Dick Eckaus… You don’t suppose that, even then???? Nah, forget it.

Q: Turning to more serious issues, what is the biggest change in economics since the old days?

A: Mechanization, by cracky. First the electric typewriter, then the computer, then the Xerox machine [handwritten insert: but not fast enough for (3 or 4 illegible words)]. Nowadays people write papers at the rate they used to wipe their… glasses. I believe Feldstein has solved the problem of hooking the typewriter directly to the Xerox machine, and the whole paper is reproduced without being touched by human hands. There is even a rumor that he has a secret way of getting the paper written without human intervention…

Q: Come come, Dr. Solow, you don’t believe that.

A: Well, have you looked at any of Feldstein’s recent papers? Now in the good old days, stand-up roll-top desks, quill pens, the main-frame abacus, a man thought twice before he wrote a paper. At least he thought once. If only old Tom were here.

Q: Tom who?

A: Tom Gresham. You know: bad working papers drive out good. Not to mention Dave Hume, the inventor of the quantity theory of working papers. As Milton used to say: any way you slice it, it’s still baloney.

Q: Is that Milton Friedman?

A: No, Milton Horowitz, the inventor of the pastrami sandwich. I believe he appears in a footnote in Joskow’s classic mustard-stained work on the subject.

Q: Let’s come to your recent impressions. What do you see as the most important recent development in economics?

A: That’s easy – the increase in the mandatory retirement age to 70. Of course it’s got a long way to go before it does me any good, but I underestimate the DRI Mandatory Retirement Age Monitor estimates the retirement age to be rising at 1.73 years per year, so time is on my side.

Q: Apart from its effects on you personally, why do you think this is an important development?

A: It saves a lot of time at department meetings never to have to make a tenure appointment again. And you know what department meetings are like – even worse than skit parties.

Q: How do you think the change will affect students?

A: They’ll love it. Courses will be the same year after year. Reading lists will never change. Textbooks will go on and on and on. Can you imagine the 200th edition of Dornbusch and Fischer? I hope it’s printed on better paper than the low-grade papyrus of the first edition… I do wonder about Eckaus and that Sphinx…… Exams will be the same year after year. Students hate change. Look at what happened when you fellows tried to change 14.121 this year.

Q: Turning to economic theory, what has been the most important development you have witnessed in the last 2000 years?

A: The two-dimensional diagram.

Q: Be serious.

A: I am serious. Can you imagine Bhagwati, the Picasso of the Production Possibility Locus, trying to fit all those curves in a one-dimensional diagram, which was all we had in the old days? There wasn’t hardly room for anything besides the axis.

Q: Come, come. Bhagwati would find a solution for that little difficulty. Who needs an axis?

A: Maybe so, but can you imagine four-color one-dimensional diagrams? How could we have expensive textbooks without four-color diagrams? How could we have expensive professors without expensive textbooks? How could……

Q: OK, OK. What is the second most important development in economic theory in your lifetime?

A: The subscript.

Q: Don’t you know the difference between trivia and serious economic theory?

A: Sure. Trivia are worth remembering, but serious economics is OK to forget.

Q: Maybe we better stick to trivia…

A: I was just kidding. I really know the answer. There is no difference between trivia and serious economic theory.

Q: Tell us about the most interesting experience you ever heard of an economist having?

A: Easy. Happened to an agricultural economist I knew, feller named Samuelson, farm boy from Gary, Indiana. He was digging on the farm one day, checking out the law of diminishing returns, and he found a potato growing with a nickel in it. Marvelous thing. Folks came from miles away to see a potato with a nickel in it. Old Samuelson frittered away the rest of his life looking for another potato with the nickel in it. Never could find one. He did find a couple with three cents in them, but somehow it wasn’t the same. Never accomplished another thing, old Samuelson. Wonder whatever became of him? He’d be 2009, I reckon. By the way, whatever became of that other farmer, Weitzman?

Q: You mean Chaim Weitzman, the founding father of Israel? His last words were: you don’t have to convince me, Professor [Frank] Fisher, I’m Jewish too.

A: No, I mean Marty Weitzman, old quick and dirty, the lion of Levittown.

Q: Why do you ask?

A: Reminds me of the fellow I used to know, a Secretary of the Treasury named Hamilton……

Q: Reminds you of who? Oh, I get it, they both got killed in the dual.

A: Watch out, Buster – the agreement was that I tell the jokes and you prove the theorems.

Q: All right. Let’s get away from personalities. What do you think of recent macro theories?

A: Not much.

Q: What about rational expectations?

A: If there were any truth in that, it would have been thought up long ago.

Q: Not necessarily. The old-timers could have thought that someone would think of it, without thinking of it themselves.

A: That’s true, but the old-timers were too sensible to think that anyone would think a thought like that.

Q: How about the quantity theory?

A: Ingenious.

Q: Really?

A: Imagine saying that velocity is so stable that only money matters, and so unstable that no use can be made of the theory, and imagine getting away with both statements.

Q: But what is macroeconomics left with then?

A: Well, the old Ioto-Sigma Lamba-Mu [Greek for “IS-LM”] curves were good enough for Aristotle, it’s good enough for me.

Q: Would you care to comment on the theory of built-in stabilizers?

A: If you’re not going to be serious, we might as well go watch a ballgame. I understand Louis Tiant, the 2000-year-old pitcher is going for the Yankees.

Q: Use your 2000-year-old imagination. I’ll give you an example of built-in stabilization – Social Security.

A: How so?

Q: The less likely it is that anyone will ever be able to collect benefits, the likelier it becomes that they make even more money consulting on Social Security. Take [Peter] Diamond, for example.

A: You take Diamond.

Q: No thanks. Imagine a man leaving a perfectly good career in public finance to go into law and economics and make a hash out of both fields.

A: Stick to the straight-man lines, please.

[Handwritten insert begins here]

Q: What do you think of the proliferation of journals?

A: I think it is terrific. Of course it has been going on for a long time – ever since BJEA, the Babylonian Journal of Economic Analysis was challenged by the SEJ, the Sumerian Economic Journal.
What I particularly like is the increased specialization. Like JHR, the Journal of Human Regressions and JME, the Journal of Mathematical Existence.

Q: The Journal of Mathematical Existence – isn’t that the one that started with the famous 2-line proof: I count, therefore I am?

A: Yes and was followed by a 47 page proof that without continuity existence was still generic.
I also like this trend toward paired journals.

Q: Paired journals?

A: Yes, like the two Harvard journals – one publishes theory without measurement and the other measurement without theory.
And then there’s the 2 JPE’s – the Journal of Public Economics and the Journal of Private Enterprise.

[handwritten insert ends]

Q: What do you see as the greatest danger facing the economics profession?

A: The threatened extension of truth-in-lending legislation to truth-in-teaching. We could have the biggest rash of malpractice suits since Nicky Kaldor retired.

Q: I think you’re onto something there. How foresighted of this department to have hired an expert on malpractice like Marilyn Simon [joined faculty 1977-78 academic year], the world-famous author of Unnecessary Surgery – The View from the Inside.

A: Simon only writes about malpractice – [Jeffrey E.] Harris actually does it, I understand.

Q: You seem to have discovered a lot since you turned up around here. Anything else new on the malpractice front?

A: There’s a rumor that the University of Chicago has had to recall all the degrees issued during the last five model years.

Q: You mean…

A: Right. Defective transmission mechanisms.

Q: Gad. Are there any good defenses against malpractice suits in your long and varied experience?

A: You can hire a mathematician for the faculty.

Q: What good does that do?

A: How the hell would I know? All I can say is that every department seems to be hiring mathematicians these days. It’s got to be for something.

Q: I’m looking for some more tried and true defense.

A: There’s always the Long-and-Variable Lags defense. See the Supreme Court decision in Tobin versus Friedman, in which Friedman successfully argued that first it’s true, second he never said it, and third wait till next year.

Q-: How about the Roy Lopez Defense?

A: You mean P–K4, P-K4; N-KB3, N-QB3; B-QN5, P-QR3?

Q: No, I mean Roy Lopez, the middle line-backer for the Princeton Economics Department – anyone sues for malpractice, he breaks their legs.

A: Sounds good. There’s also the classic defense due to Stanley Fischer, that truth should be indexed. Today’s malpractice is tomorrow’s conventional wisdom.

Q: Speaking of conventional wisdom, have you spoken with Professor Galbraith since your return?

A: No, but I have been reading his latest book: Why Are People Poor?

Q: I’ll bite; why are people poor?

A: Not enough income, according to Galbraith.

Q: Does he have a remedy?

A: Move to Switzerland.

Q: I see.

A: I can’t wait until the news reaches Calcutta.

Q: One last question, to return to the subject with which we started. Do you see any trends in student skits?

A: Longer.

Q: Longer and funnier?

A: Longer.

Q: Any final comment?

A: Let me ask you a question. What do you consider the most remarkable thing in this interview?

Q: That’s easy. We never mentioned IBM.

 

Source:  Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archives. Papers of Robert M. Solow. Box 83.

Image Source:  Carl Reiner and Mel Brooks performing the 2000 year old man from NPR KNAU, Arizona public radio article “Could You Talk To a Caveman?” (May 9, 2013) .

Categories
Exam Questions M.I.T. Principles Suggested Reading Undergraduate

M.I.T. Principles of Macroeconomics. 1995-2006

 

An earlier post provided links to assorted course materials for Principles of Microeconomics (14.01) taught at M.I.T. from 1994 to 2005.

Perhaps my productivity as an internet archive scavenger has simply improved with practice, but I suspect that the instructors and their teaching assistants for Principles of Macroeconomics (14.02) from 1995 through 2006 at M.I.T. were simply better organized in keeping copies of their syllabi, problem sets, exams etc. available for later cohorts. Anyhow, today I provide the results of several days of trolling (in a good way) the Wayback Machine internet archive for a decade long window spanning the most recent turn of a century.

Below you will find syllabi, class schedules, problem sets and solutions, exams and solutions plus links to lecture slides and supplementary readings where found. 

Fall 1995
Professor Olivier Blanchard

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1  (Solutions)

Problem Set 2  (Solutions)

Problem Set 3  (Solutions)

Problem Set 4  (Solutions)

Problem Set 5  (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions )

Problem Set 7 (Solutions )

Problem Set 8  (Solutions )

Problem Set 9 (Solutions)

Exams

Exam 1   (Solutions)

Exam 2 (Solutions)

Final Exam (Solutions not found)

Spring 1996
Professor Ricardo Cabellero

Exams

Exam 1 (Solutions)

Exam 2 (Solutions)

Final Exam (Solutions) [neither questions nor solutions found]

Fall 1996

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Problem Set 8 (Solutions)

Problem Set 9 (Solutions)

Exams

Exam 1 (Solutions)

Exam 2 (Solutions)

Final Exam (Solutions) [neither questions nor solutions found]

Spring 1997
Professor Ricardo Caballero

Home page

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Problem Set 8 (Solutions)

Problem Set 9 (Solutions)

Exams

Exam 1 (Solutions)

Exam 2 (Solutions)

Final Exam (Solutions) [neither questions nor solutions found]

Fall 1997
Professor Paul Krugman

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions) [questions not found]

Problem Set 2 (Solutions) [questions not found]

Problem Set 3 (Solutions) [questions not found]

Problem Set 4 (Solutions) [questions not found]

Problem Set 5 (Solutions) [questions not found]

Problem Set 6 (Solutions) [questions not found]

Problem Set 7 (Solutions) [questions not found]

Problem Set 8 (Solutions) [questions not found]

Problem Set 9 (Solutions) [neither questions nor solutions found]

Exams

Exam 1 (Solutions)

Exam 2 (Solutions)

Final Exam (Solutions)

Spring 1998
Professor Ricardo Caballero

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Problem Set 8 (Solutions)

Problem Set 9 (Solutions)

Exams

Exam 1 with Solutions

Exam 2, Parts I and II with Solutions

Exam 2, Part III (Solutions)

Final Exam with Solutions

Fall 1998
Professor Paul Krugman

For this term we have a cornucopia of material that includes lecture slides and handouts along with syllabus, reading assignments, problem sets and examination questions with solutions. This material has been put together for an earlier post.

 

Spring 1999
Roger Brinner

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard, Macroeconomics

Syllabus and schedule

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4  (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Exams

Exam 1 (Solutions)

Exam 2 (Solutions)

Final Exam [neither questions nor solutions found]

Fall 1999
Professor Ricardo Caballero

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard, Macroeconomics

Course home page

Syllabus

Schedule

Lecture Slides

September 8 — Chapter 1: Tour of the World

September 13 — Chapter 2: Economic Data

September 15 — Chapter 2 and 3: Economic Data and the Goods Market

September 20 — Chapter 3 and 4: The Goods Market and Dynamics

September 22 — Chapter 5: The Financial Market

September 27 — Chapter 5: The Financial Market and the Role of Banks

September 29 — Chapter 6: The Role of Banks and the IS-LM Model

October 4 — Chapter 6: The IS-LM Model

October 6 — Chapter 6 : Review of the IS-LM Model

October 13 — Chapter 11: Openness in Goods and Financial Markets

October 18 — Chapters 11 and 12: Openness in Goods and Financial Markets

October 20 — Chapter 12: Openness in the Goods Market

October 25 — Chapters 12 and 13: Open Economy IS-LM

October 27 — Chapter 13: Open Economy IS-LM

November 1 — Chapters 13, 14.4 and 14.5: Fixed Exchange Rates and Crises

November 3 — Review: a collection of old transparencies, not posted

November 8 — Chapter 15: The Labor Market

November 10 — Chapters 15 and 16: Aggregate Supply and Demand

November 15 — Chapter 16: Aggregate Supply and Demand

November 17 — Chapter 16: Shifting the AS-AD

November 22 — Chapter 17: The Phillips Curve

November 24 — Chapters 18 and 19: Disinflation and Real Interest Rates

November 29 — Chapter 19: Inflation, Real Interest Rates and Exchange Rates

December 1 — Chapters 19, 22 and 23: AS-AD with Fixed Exchange Rates; Growth

December 6 — Chapters 22 and 23: Growth; Review I

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Problem Set 8 (Solutions)

Problem Set 9 (Solutions)

Exams

Exam 1 (Solutions)

Exam 2 with solutions

Final Exam  (Solutions)

Spring 2000
Professor Roger Brinner

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard, Macroeconomics(2nded).

Syllabus

Schedule

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Problem Set 8 (Solutions)

Exams

Exam 1 (Solutions)

Exam 2 (Solutions)

Final Exam (Solutions not found)

Fall 2000
Professor Ricardo Caballero

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard, Macroeconomics

Course home page

Syllabus

Schedule

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Problem Set 8 (Solutions) (Graphs)

Problem Set 9 (Solutions)

Exams

Exam 1 (Solutions)

Exam 2 (Solutions)

Exam 2, conflict (Solutions)

Exam 3 (Solutions)

Exam 3, conflict (Solutions)

Spring 2001
Professor Roger Brinner

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard, Macroeconomics(2nd edition)

Course home page

Syllabus

Schedule

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions not found)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions not found)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions not found)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Exams

Quiz #1 (Solutions)

Quiz #1 Conflict (Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Solutions, htm; Solutions, pdf)

Final Exam:  Book One (.doc); Book Two (.doc)

Fall 2001
Professor Ricardo Caballero

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard, Macroeconomics (2nded)

Syllabus

Schedule

Lecture slides

September 5 — Chapter 1: Tour of the World

September 10 — Chapter 2: Tour of the Book

September 12 — Chapter 3: The Goods Market

September 19 — Chapter 3: The Goods Market (continued)

September 24 — Chapter 4: Financial Markets

September 26 — Chapter 4: Financial Markets (continued)

October 1 — Chapter 5: The IS-LM Model

October 3 — Review Session

October 10 — Chapter 18: The Open Economy

October 15 — Chapter 19: The Goods Market in an Open Economy

October 17 — Chapter 20: Output, the Interest Rate and the Exchange Rate

October 22 — Chapter 20: Output, the Interest Rate and the Exchange Rate (continued)

October 24 — Chapter 21.2: Exchange Rate Crises

October 29 — Chapter 6.3-6.4: Building the Aggregate Supply: The Labor Market

October 31 — Chapter 6.5-7.1: Building the Aggregate Supply (continued)

November 5 — Chapter 7.1-7.3: Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply

November 7 — Review Session

November 14 — Chapter 7.4-7.7: AD-AS, Canonical Policy Shocks

November 19 — Chapter 8: The Phillips Curve

November 21 — Chapter 9: The Phillips Curve and the Natural Rate

November 26 — Chapter 14.1, 14.3-14.4: Nominal and Real Interest Rates
Chapter 21.1: Open Economy AS-AD

November 28 — Chapter 13.1-13.2: Productivity Growth in AD-AS.  Chapter 10: Growth – The Facts

December 3 — Chapter 11.1-11.2: Growth – Saving, Capital Accumulation and Output

December 5 — Review

Problem Sets (best seven of nine for 25% of grade)

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions) (Graphs)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions) (Graphs)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Problem Set 8 (Solutions)

Problem Set 9 (Solutions) (Graphs)

Exams (note no final exam, three quizzes for 75% of grade)

Quiz 1 (Solutions)

Quiz 2 (Solutions)

Quiz 3 (Solutions)

Spring 2002
Professor Roger Brinner

Lectures

February 06: Course Objectives and Introductions

February 11: The Policy Tradeoff: Unemployment vs. Changes in Inflation

February 13: The Fiscal Policy

February 19: National Income Accounts and the Government Budget

February 20: Core Growth Theory

February 25;&27: Basic Econometric Tools Used in Macroeconomics

March 1: Basic Econometric Tools Used in Macroeconomics- Handout

March 06: IS-LM Introduction

March 08: Aggregate Supply and Demand

March 11: Review

March 13: Review

March 18: Consumer Spending & House Demand

March 20: Business Investment

April 01: Foreign Trade & Exchange Rates

April 03: Inflation

April 08: Money Demand

April 10: Review by Prof. Brinner

April 17: Growth

April 22: Integrating IS-LM and the Modern Phillips

April 24: Fiscal Policy in the 1990s

April 29: International Growth & Crises

May 01: Stock & Bond Markets

May 06: Monetary Policy in the 1990s

May 08: Social Security and the National Debt

May 13: US Business Cycles: Experience vs. Theory

May 15: Review

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Exams

Quiz #1 (Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Solutions)

Quiz #3 (Solutions)

Fall 2002
Professor Huntley Schaller

Syllabus

Schedule

Readings

Recitations

Recitations by Samer HajYehia (PDF)
“Consumption and Housing” Recitation (PDF)
Class Notes Part 1 (PDF)
Class Notes Part 2 (PDF)

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Problem Set 8 (Solutions)

Exams

Quiz #1 (Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Solutions)

Quiz #3 (Questions and Solutions)

Spring 2003
Professor Olivier Blanchard

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard’s Macroeconomics, 3rd ed.

Course Home Page

Syllabus

Schedule

 REQUIRED READINGS:

 REVIEW ARTICLES:

 ADDITIONAL READINGS:

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Exams

Quiz #1 (Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Solutions)

Quiz #3 (Solutions)

Fall 2003
Professor Ricardo Cabllero

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard’s Macroeconomics.

Course Home Page

Syllabus

Schedule

Ha Yan Notes (zip)

Lectures

Lecture 1. Introduction

Lecture 2. Basic Definitions

Lecture 3. Basic Aggregate Demand Model

Lecture 4. Goods/Financial Markets

Lecture 5. Financial Markets (Cont.)

Lecture 6. IS-LM

Lecture 7. IS-LM (Cont.)

Lecture 8 (review)

Lecture 9. Open Economy

Lecture 10. Goods Market in the Open Economy

Lecture 11. Goods Market and the Exchange Rate

Lecture 12. The Open Economy IS-LM (II)

Lecture 13. Exchange Rate Systems

Lecture 14. Building Aggregate Supply

Lecture 15. Aggregate Supply–Aggregate Demand

Lecture 16. Aggregate Supply, Aggregate Demand (cont.)

Lecture 17. AD-AS + The Phillips Curve

Lecture 18. Inflation and Unemployment

Lecture 19. Devaluations in an AD-AS framework (.ppt)

Lecture 20. Productivity growth (.ppt)

Lecture 21. Growth (.ppt)

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Exams

Quiz #1 (Questions and Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Questions and Solutions)

Quiz #3 (Questions and Solutions)

Spring 2004
Professor Olivier Blanchard

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard’s Macroeconomics, 3rd edition.

Syllabus

Schedule

Readings

Week of 2/9:

Article 1:  “Easy Money”  (The Fed and inflation)

Article 2: “Competitive Sport in Boca Raton”  (Questions about the strength of the dollar)

Week of 2/16:

Article 3: “Irrational Exuberance”

Article 4:  Insanity in the Japanese stock market?

Article 5:  The Unemployment Rate and Economic Health

Article 6: Soaring stocks in Southeast Asia

Article 7:  Are the tech stocks back?

Week of 2/23:

Article 8: Macroeconomic performance in Germany

Week of 3/15:

Article 9: Unemployment rates in Spain and Portugal

Week of 4/5:

Article 10:  Economic Recovery in the U.S.

Week of 4/19:

Article 11:  Chinese economic outlook

Article 12:  U.S. economic outlook

Article 13:  Interest rates in the US

International Monetary Fund’s semi-annual report

Week of 5/3:

Reading (not required): Overview of Argentina

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions) [note: dated 3/17/03, but not same as problem 3 of Spring 2003]

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Exams

Quiz #1 (Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Solutions) (Graphs)

Quiz #3 (Solutions)

Fall 2004
Professor Richard Caballero

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard’s Macroeconomics, 3rd edition.

Course home page

Syllabus

Schedule

All course materials as zip file

Lectures

Lecture 1. Introduction

Lecture 2. Definitions and First Model

Lecture 3. Basic Aggregate Demand Model

Lecture 4. Financial Markets

Lecture 5. IS-LM (1)

Lecture 6. IS-LM (2)

Lecture 7. Open Economy

Lecture 8. Goods Market and Exchange Rate

Lecture 9. Review

Lecture 10. Open Economy IS-LM

Lecture 11. Mundell-Fleming

Lecture 12. Aggregate Supply

Lecture 13. Aggregate Supply and Aggregate Demand

Lecture 14. AD-AS and the Phillips Curve

Lecture 15. Phillips Curve

Lecture 16. Review

Lecture 17. Real Interest Rates/Open economy AD-AS framework

Lecture 18. Growth

Lectures 19 and 20. Solow model (apparently available in zipped files above)

Lecture 21. Technological Progress and Unemployment

Lecture 22. Expected Present Discounted Values

Lecture 23. Bond Prices and Yields

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Exams

Quiz #1 (Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Solutions)

Quiz #3 (Solutions)

Spring 2005
Professor Olivier Blanchard

Textbook:  Olivier Blanchard, Macroeconomics, 3rd edition.

Course Home Page

Syllabus

Schedule

Lectures (only seven found)

Lecture 1 (Feb 2): Introduction and a Tour of the World (Ch 1)

Lecture 6 (Feb 22): The 2001 Recession

Lecture 20 (Apr 20): Open Economy (Ch 18)

Lecture 21 (Apr 25): Open Economy–The Goods Market (Ch 19)

Lecture 22 (Apr 27): Open Economy–The Goods Market (Ch 19)

Lecture 23/24 (May 2/4): Output, Interest Rate, and the Exchange Rate (Ch 20)

Lecture 25/26 (May 9/11): Exchange Rate Regimes (Ch 21)

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Problem Set 7 (Solutions)

Exams

Quiz #1 (Questions and Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Solutions)

Quiz #3 (Questions and Solutions)

Fall 2005
Professor Francesco Giavazzi

Textbook:  Olivier Blanchard. Macroeconomics, 4th ed.

Course Material Folder

Syllabus

Schedule

Lectures. (Only last lecture found)

December 14. Using the book to understand the state of the U.S. economy

Problem Sets

Problem Set 1 (Solutions)

Problem Set 2 (Solutions)

Problem Set 3 (Solutions)

Problem Set 4 (Solutions)

Problem Set 5 (Solutions)

Problem Set 6 (Solutions)

Exams

Quiz #1 (Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Solutions)

Quiz #3 (Solutions)

Spring 2006
Olivier Blanchard

Textbook: Olivier Blanchard. Macroeconomics 4/E (2006)

Course home page

Syllabus

Schedule

Problem Sets with Solutions

Problem set 1

Problem set 2

Report of the President (B4)

Report of the President (B5)

Fed. Funds Rates

Japan (OECD)

Problem set 3

Problem set 4

Spreadsheet for SQ.1

Problem set 5

Problem set 6

ps6sq3.xls

Practice exercise for Chapter 20

Exams

Quiz #1 (Solutions)

Quiz #2 (Solutions)

Quiz #3 (Solutions)

 

Image:  Mr. Peabody (dog) and Sherman (boy) activating the original WABAC Machine.

 

 

Categories
M.I.T. Suggested Reading Syllabus

M.I.T. Theories of State and Economy. Piore and Berger, 1977

 

Michael Piore, a labor economist, and Suzanne Berger, a political scientist (European and global political economy), team-taught the following graduate course in political economy at M.I.T. during the second term of 1976-77, its first-run. The course requirement was a short-fuse take-home examination. It was a fun reading list for a third-year graduate student of economics. It also just so happens that I have taught about a quarter of these readings in my undergraduate team-taught course on origins of political economy at Bard College Berlin this semester!

One salient memory from the course was Berger’s enthusiasm for the work of the (then) young scholar Roberto Unger. Another was the look on Piore’s face when he realized that in his haste he had labeled his upward sloping line in p-q space a “demand curve”. Quelle horreur!

One can find the Spring 2016 version of the course at the MIT Open Courseware site, along with archived versions for 2002, 2005, and 2010). Here that 2016 reading list. This is a course that is apparently still running, which is over a decade longer than Broadway’s Phantom of the Opera (thus far, that show is still running too).

_________________

Economics 14.781J, Michael Piore
Political Science 17.945J, Suzanne Berger

POLITICAL ECONOMY I: THEORIES OF THE STATE AND THE ECONOMY
[1976]

February 8: Introduction

February 15: Neo-classical theories of the economy

Readings:
Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom
Robert Solow, “The New Industrial State, or Son of Affluence”, and Galbraith reply, in The Public Interest, no. 9, fall 1967.
Robin Marris “Galbraith, Solow and the Truth about Corporations” in The Public Interest, no. 11 spring 1968, pp. 37-46
Robert Solow “The Truth Further Redefined: A Comment on Marris” in Ibid. pp. 47-52.
Robert Solow “Blood and Thunder” in Yale Law Review, pp. 1696-1711.
[K.J. Arrow “Gifts and Exchanges”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Summer 1972 No. 4]

February 22: Theories of the liberal state:

Readings:
Roberto Unger, Knowledge and Politics, chapters 1-3.

March 1: Theories of the liberal state:

Readings:
John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, chapters 1-5, 7-9.
Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action, chapters 1,2,3,4.

March 8: Marxist theories of the economy

Readings:
Marx, “The Communist Manifesto” in Tucker, ed. Marx-Engels Reader, Part II.

March 15: Neo-marxist theories of the economy

Reading:
G.C. Harcourt, “Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital,” The Journal of Economic Literature, vol. VII, 1969, pp. 369-405.

March 22: Marxist theories of the state:

Readings:
Marx, “Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy” in Tucker, ed. Marx-Engels Reader
Marx, “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte,” in Tucker ed.

March 29: Vacation

April 5: Neo-marxist theories of the state:

Readings:
L. Althusser, “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses,” in Lenin and Philosophy
Thompson, Whigs and Hunters, “Introduction” (pp. 21-24) and “Consequences and Conclusions (219-269)

April 12: Neo-marxist theories of the state:

Readings:
Antonio Gramsci, “The Modern Prince”

 

Reading list for cases to be discussed April 19-May 10 will be distributed later.

Reading List
Part II

April 19: [Patriots Day – No Class] Crises and Growth:

Reading:
Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Part II
W. W. Rostow, The Stage of Economic Growth, Chapters 1-5, 10

April 26: Crises and Growth:

Reading:
Paul Sweezy, The Theory of Capitalist Development, Part III
Recommended: Jurgen Habermas, Legitimation Crisis

May 3: Ethnicity and Regionalism:

Readings.
Michael Hechter, Internal Colonialism, Chapters 1, 2, 9, 10.
D. Moynihan and N. Glazer, Beyond the Melting Pot, [pp. 1-23, 292-310, and any two interior chapters.)

May 10: Welfare

Readings:
E. Ginzberg and R. Solow The Great Society, Introduction, Chapter 3, Conclusion (Chapter 11).
F. Piven and R. Cloward, Regulating the Poor

May 17: Exam due

Source: Irwin Collier, personal copy from course.

Image Sources: Suzanne Berger in MIT News, Feb. 8, 2006. Michael Piore from screen capture of his webpage at M.I.T. (Mar 13, 2012 Wayback Machine)

Categories
Exam Questions M.I.T. Suggested Reading Syllabus

M.I.T. Reading list and final exam for core graduate growth and capital theory. Solow, 1973

 

Core macroeconomic theory was taught in a sequence of four half-semester courses at M.I.T. In this post we have material from the final course of the sequence (typically taken in the fall term of the second year of residency) that was dedicated to growth and capital theory and taught by Robert Solow in 1973.

The course syllabus and final examination for the third course in the sequence on Macroeconometric Models taught by Franco Modigliani were transcribed for the previous post.

Economics in the Rear-view Mirror thanks Juan C. A. Acosta who copied the course syllabus and final examination that are found in the Franco Modigliani Papers (Box T7) at the Duke University Economists’ Papers Project and has graciously shared them for transcription here. 

___________

14.454
MACRO THEORY IV
Fall 1973 2nd half

  1. Growth Theory

background, if necessary: Solow, GROWTH THEORY, Ch. 1,2
Burmeister and Dobell: MATHEMATICAL THEORIES OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, Ch. 1-4
and/or
Wan: ECONOMIC GROWTH, Ch. 1, 2, 4 (sec. 3)
Kahn: “Exercise in the Analysis of Growth,” OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS, New Series, Vol. 11, 1959, pp. 143-156 (reprinted in GROWTH ECONOMICS, ed. A. K. Sen, Penguin)
Wan: Ch. 4, sec. 4

  1. Optimal Growth

background, if necessary: Solow, GROWTH THEORY, Ch. 5
Burmeister and Dobell: Ch. 11
and/or
Wan: Ch. 9, 10
Koopmans: “Objectives, Constraints and Outcomes in Optimal Growth Models” ECONOMETRICA, Vol. 35, 1967, pp. 1-15 (reprinted in Koopmans, SCIENTIFIC PAPERS, pp. 548-560)

  1. Capital Theory

Malinvaud: LECTURES ON MICROECONOMIC THEORY, Ch. 10
Hirschleifer: INVESTMENT, INTEREST AND CAPITAL, Ch. 2, 3, 4, 6
Dougherty: “On the Rate of Return and the Rate of Profit” ECONOMIC JOURNAL, December 1972, pp. 1324-1349
Burmeister and Dobell: Ch. 8, 9
Weizsäcker: STEADY-STATE CAPITAL THEORY, pp. 1-22, 32-47, and passim

Source:  Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Papers of Robert M. Solow, Box 68. Also in Franco Modigliani Papers, Box T7.

 

14.454 FINAL EXAM
19 Dec 1973
R. M. Solow

ANSWER TWO QUESTIONS, total time 1 ½ hours

  1. Suppose an economy with effectively unlimited supply of labor in the sense that any amount of labor is available (from an agricultural pools, say) at an institutionally determined real wage \bar{w}. In other respects the economy is like the standard one-sector model.
    1. Analyze the growth of such an economy if saving and investment are proportional to output. What might correspond to the “full employment, full utilization” assumption?
    2. What if saving and investment are proportional to profits?
    3. How does a once-for-all change in \bar{w} affect the growth path, and the share of wages in total output?
  2. Sketch an analysis of an optimal-capital-accumulation problem in which the criterion function values the capital stock (per worker) as well as consumption, for prestige or power reasons, say, so that instantaneous utility is written u(c,k). In particular, is it true, as we would expect, that such a society should save more than it would if it valued consumption only?
  3. Criticize the “neoclassical” theory of growth and capital; but do not be vague – where you have a complaint you should be prepared to suggest a better way.

 

Source:  Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Franco Modigliani Papers, Box T7.

Image Source:  Robert Solow pictures at the MIT Museum Website.