Categories
Exam Questions History of Economics Princeton Suggested Reading Syllabus

Princeton. History of Economic Thought. Reading List, General Exam. Baumol, 1987-1988

What I find useful about the syllabus on classical economics from William Baumol’s Princeton course transcribed below is that it provides a lean and precise list of original text reading assignments to work through. Full-blown bibliographies have their use for students when writing term papers, but this butcher’s choice of filet cuts provides a wholesome main course that will last a semester and provide pleasant memories for a lifetime.

Here you will find other postings at Economics in the Rear-view Mirror that offer material from courses in the history of economics.

_______________________

Alan B. Krueger’s Interview with William J. Baumol in Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 3 (Summer 2001), pp. 211-231.

_______________________

Princeton University
Department of Economics

Economics 506
History of Economic Thought

Fall Term 1988

Professor W.J. Baumol

Smith, Adam, Wealth of Nations, 1776, Book I, Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 (first 20 pages), 10 (first 17 pages); Book II, Chapter 3; Book IV, Chapters 1, 2, 8.

Malthus, T.R., An Essay on the Principle of Population, 1798, Pelican Edition, 1970, Introduction by Anthony Flew, Chapters 1-5, 18, 19.

Ricardo, David, On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London, 1817, Chapters I-X, XIX-XXI, XXX-XXXI.

*Ricardo David, Notes on Malthus, Piero Sraffa, editor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951, Editor’s Introduction and pp. 300-382.

Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels, Manifesto of the Communist Party.

Marx, Karl, Capital (3 volumes), New York: International Publishing Company.

Volume I: Author’s Prefaces; Chapter 1; Chapter 3, Sections II a, b; Chapter 5; Chapter 6; Chapter 7, Section 2; Chapter 8; Chapter 9, Sections 1, 3, 4; skim Chapter 10; Chapter 15, Section 6; Chapter 16; Chapter 24, Sections 2, 3, 5; Chapter 25.

Volume II:Preface; Chapter 9; Chapter 16, Part 3; pp. 390-396 (Chapter 17, last 6 pages on Simple Reproduction); Chapter 20; pp. 576-9 (Chapter 21, I, Accumulation in Department 1 (1) formation of a hoard).

Volume III: Preface; Chapters 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 22, 27, 37, 38, 48.

*Marx, Karl,  A Critique of the Gotha Program, Moscow, Progress Publishers, 1937.

*On reserve at Firestone Library.

Source: Edward Tower (compiler). Economics Reading Lists, Course Outlines, Exams, Puzzles & Problems, Vol. 24. History of Economic Thought. Durham, NC: Eno River Press, August 1990, page 38.

_______________________

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

General Examination for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

History of Economic Thought
January 1987

Time: 3 hours

  1. Distinguish the roles of the labor command and the labor content discussions of value in Adam Smith. What was Smith’s general model of the determination of long run exchange value under competition?
  2. In terms of the formal Ricardian model, explain the consequences of elimination of a tariff on grain (corn) (a) in the short run; (b) in the long run.
  3. (a) Explain why, in Marx’s view, profits under capitalism can be expected to decline with the passage of time. (b) Why did he reject Ricardo’s model leading to the same conclusion? (c) On what grounds has Marx’s model of the declining profit rate been criticized?
  4. In one sentence each, characterize some of the main work of the following:
    1. Jeremy Bentham
    2. Frederick Bastiat
    3. J.B. Clark
    4. J. R. McCulloch
    5. Enrico Barone
  5. (for Arthur Moretti) Describe the logic of the Hayek business cycle model. What role is played by technological elements? by monetary elements? What is the pertinence of the “Ricardo effect?”
  6. (for Kin Yip Louie) Explain the source of Marshall’s error in using consumers’ surplus to argue that increasing returns industries should be subsidized. Would the Hicksian analysis of the four consumers surpluses have helped ra avoid the error? Why or why not?
  7. (for Susan Skeath [“Susan Skeath van Mulbregt”, Princeton Ph.D., 1989; Professor of Economics at Wellesley College]) Explain the role played by utility in J. S. Mill’s value theory. Does his utility concept lead him to particular policy conclusions? How do Mill’s views on the appropriate role of government differ from those of his classical predecessors?
  8. (for Teow-Hock Koh [“Winston Teow-Hock Koh”, Princeton Ph.D., 1988; Professor at Singapore Management University; died 2013]) (To what extent does Malthus’ contradistinction to his analysis conclusions) structure anticipate the of the Keynesian model? In provide a answering this, summary of the workings of the pertinent parts the Keynesian analysis. What features of Marxian Theory overlap with the Keynesian model?
  9. (for Vicente Morales) a) Describe any of the mathematical solutions to the transformation problem showing how prices and the rate of profit are related to values and the rate of surplus value. b) Explain Samuelson’s criticism of the entire analysis and Morishima’s reply.

Source: Edward Tower (compiler). Economics Reading Lists, Course Outlines, Exams, Puzzles & Problems, Vol. 24. History of Economic Thought. Durham, NC: Eno River Press, August 1990, pp. 266-267.

Image Source:  Cropped from portrait of William J. Baumol in 1981 published in his obituary published in The New York Times, May 10, 2017.

Categories
Chicago Funny Business Harvard M.I.T. Princeton

M.I.T. Faculty Skit, Playing Monopoly at Lunch, 1986

 

It has been a while since I have added an artifact to the MIT economics skits wing of the Funny Business Archives here at Economics in the Rear-view Mirror. Apparently the following script was a, if not the sole, late-20th century MIT faculty skit not written by Robert Solow. I can believe that. In any event, today’s post is further grist to the mill for social historians of economics.

Again a grateful tip of the hat to Roger Backhouse is in order.

__________________

1986 FACULTY SKIT

(Skit opens with Dornbusch, Fischer, Diamond, Eckaus and McFadden seated around MONOPOLY board. Farber is standing alongside, watching the game. Fisher and Hausman are in the wings to make walk-on appearances).

ANNOUNCER: One of the most important unwritten rules in the Economics Department is that no one but Bob Solow writes the skit. This year, Bob reportedly outdid himself and wrote a sitcom in which Bob Lucas is struck by a blinding light while driving to work and transformed into a neo-Keynesian. The skit, titled “I’m OK, You’re OK,” follows Lucas’ attempts to explain why he is estimating Phillips curves to Lars Hansen and Tom Sargent.

Unfortunately, Bob is unable to be with us tonight, since he is delivering the presidential address to the Eastern Economic Association in Philadelphia. When we opened the envelope marked “SKIT” which Bob left for us, we were surprised to discover only a copy of his presidential address. We suspect he had a somewhat bigger surprise when he opened his envelope in Philadelphia. [Address published as “What is a Nice Girl Like You Doing in a Place Like This? Macroeconomics after Fifty YearsEastern Economic Journal, July-September 1986]

We were of course scared skitless when we realized our predicament, and we were tempted to re-run some of the great Solow skits of the past. There was the 1974 Watergate Skit, in which Paul Colson Joskow testifies to Senator Sam Peltzman that he would run over his grandmother to get a t-statistic above two. There was the 1978 Star Wars skit, in which Milton Vader and his minions capture the wookie Jerrybaca and hold him captive in the Chicago Money Workshop. And in the incredible 1973 MASH skit, Hawkeye Hall and Trapper Jerry Hausman find Radar Diamond and Hot Lips Friedlaender cavorting in the Chairman’s office. (If that doesn’t give Solow Rational expectations, what does?)

We guessed that you had all seen these re-runs on late-nite channel 56, however, and therefore decided to try something new and provide a partial answer to the age-old question: What Really Goes On in the Freeman Room at Lunchtime on Wednesdays? We now invite you to join us for a brief look at one of these infamous gatherings…

 

MCFADDEN: (Rolling dice). “Who owns Oriental Avenue?”

DORNBUSCH: Me. That’s six dollars.

FISCHER: My turn? (Rolls dice). Damn. Inflation tax again; Here’s ten percent of my cash balances. I passed go, didn’t I?

DIAMOND: Uh huh. Here’s $186 dollars.

FISCHER: I should get $200.

DIAMOND: Not since Gramm-Rudman. Everything’s reduced seven percent across the board.

DORNBUSCH: My turn. (Rolling dice). Four. (Reaches over and moves marker).

ECKAUS: No way, Rudi—you just moved six places. No overshooting in this game. (Hands Dornbusch Chance card)

DORNBUSCH: Ah. Go directly to Brazil. Do not return until the day classes start.

HAUSMAN: (Walking in from side of stage) How come you guys are playing MONOPOLY? I thought you usually played RISK…

DIAMOND: Oliver [Hart] took that game home. You know, his contract calls for RISK-sharing…

HAUSMAN: Can you believe the graduate students scheduled the skit party for the Friday before income taxes are due? The only people who’ll come are graduate students and people like theorists who file 1040 EZ’s. (walks off)

(FISHER walks in)

DIAMOND: (Rolling dice). My turn. Oriental again. Six more dollars for Dornbusch.

FISCHER: That’s a pretty profitable property, Rudi.

FISHER: How many times do I have to say it! You can’t possibly tell that from accounting numbers! (Pause). Why don’t we ever play fun games, like Consultant?

ECKAUS: I hear Jorgensen and Griliches play that all the time up at Harvard. Maybe you should give them a call.

FISHER: They’re never around.

DIAMOND: Of course not, Frank—that’s how you play consultant.

(FISHER exits.)

FARBER: Speaking of Harvard, how are we doing on graduate recruitment this year? I heard there was some Princeton scandal.

DIAMOND: The AEA put them on probation for recruiting violations. People could look the other way when they offered prospective students money and cars, but this year Joe Stiglitz promised to write a joint paper with all entering students.

FARBER: They’re really giving out cars?

DIAMOND: Sure. Yugo’s.

FARBER: All I got was a motorcycle…

MCFADDEN: Harvard and Princeton have been dumping all over us. Every prospective student has heard that Jerry Hausman cashed in his Frequent Flyer miles for a 727. And some even know that Marty Weitzman has a Harvard offer.

FISCHER: Well, that offer was certainly no surprise. The Harvard deans read THE SHARE ECONOMY and decided they should hire more workers.

DIAMOND: Still, we’re getting the best students. This morning I signed a Yale undergrad by offering him Solow’s office. I figured Bob can share E52-390 with Krugman, Eckaus, and Farber next year. But what happens when we run out of river-view offices?

FARBER: How’s Harvard doing on recruiting?

ECKAUS: Not too well. They’re on a big kick to look relevant. Mas-Collel’s going nuts—Dean Spence has a new rule that any agent in a theoretical model has to have a proper name. Andreu’s having real problems with his continuum papers…

MCFADDEN: I hear the Kennedy School’s helping their visibility. Have you heard about the new Meese Distinguished Service Medal?

DIAMOND: No. Who’s getting them?

MCFADDEN: Sammy Stewart for Distinguished Relief Pitching,
Martin Feldstein for Distinguished Empirical Work,
Larry Summers for Distinguished Dress,
NASA for distinction in Travel Safety,
Bob Lucas and Bob Barro for Distinguished Plausible Assumptions,
Ferdinand Marcos for Distinguished Contributions to Charity,
and John Kenneth Galbraith for Distinguished Use of Mathematics.

DORNBUSCH: Harvard’s visibility campaign’s paying off. Just last week one of their junior guys hit the cover of PEOPLE magazine with a paper about marriage rates among movie stars.

FISCHER: You read PEOPLE?

FARBER: The National Enquirer had a story about a Harvard student who claimed to have a picture of Jeff Sachs in Littauer. Just like the old days with Howard Hughes…

DORNBUSCH: Perhaps we should return to the game.

(MODIGLIANI walks on).

DIAMOND: My turn again? (Rolls dice and moves piece). Community Chest. (Looking at card) You are elected department head. Lose three turns.

(Someone walks up and hands DIAMOND a telephone message. He stands up.)

DIAMOND: I nearly forgot. I’m scheduled to join Mike Weisbach who is taking a prospective student windsurfing this afternoon. Figured it was the least I could do to convince him we were as laid back as Stanford. Franco—do you want to take my place?

MODIGLIANI: (Sitting down in Diamond’s place) So, what are the new developments on the Monopoly front? [Famous Modigliani paper “New Developments on the Oligopoly Front,” JPE, June 1958] (Pause) Now, which of these pieces is Peter’s?

MCFADDEN: The coconut. [Reference here to Diamond’s coconut model of a search economy.]

MODIGLIANI: My turn now?

FISCHER: No Franco—but go ahead. [presumably a reference to Modigliani’s propensity to talk, and talk, and talk.]

MODIGLIANI: (Rolls dice and moves marker). Chance. (McFadden hands him a card). What is this? You have won second prize in a Beauty Contest, Collect $10? This is NOT POSSIBLE. This year I win only FIRST PRIZES [reference to 1985 Nobel Prize for Economics].

DORNBUSCH: (To audience) Wait till he gets the bequest card… [cf. the JEP Spring 1988 paper by Modigliani that surveys the bequest motive]

FISCHER: Franco, I have a deal for you. I’ll trade you Mediterranean and the Water Works for North Carolina and an agreement that you never charge me rent on either property. If you renege, I’ll order Chinese food.

MODIGLIANI: No deal. But what’s this about Chinese food?

FISCHER: It’s a new thing I learned from Garth [Soloner]—it makes the deal sub-gum perfect.

MCFADDEN: My turn. (Rolls and draws a Chance card). My favorite card: Advance Token to the Railroad with the Highest Logit Probability Value. Let me see which one that is… (pulls out a calculator)

FISCHER: While we’re waiting for Dan to converge, how did we do in junior hiring? Did we get that Princeton theorist?

ECKAUS: No dice. All the Princeton guys told him not to come.

DORNBUSCH: Why?

ECKAUS: They said “Go to Yale, go directly to Yale.”

MODIGLIANI: What about senior appointments?

FARBER: Ask Peter [Temin]. He’s on the Search Committee.

MCFADDEN: (Looking up from calculator). I’m having convergence problems. Maybe we should postpone the game for a few minutes while I run down to the PRIME.

[the image of the last page at my disposal is very blurred, fortunately it is only the wrap-up by the announcer]

ANNOUNCER: As you all know, NOTHING takes a few minutes on the PRIME. So until next year, when the [?] [?] Solow who accompanied Stan, 3PO and R2D2 to [?] the [?] [?] from Chicago returns to produce another skit. Good night.

 

Source: Duke University, David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Papers of Robert M. Solow, Box 83.

Categories
Berkeley Economists Harvard Princeton

Harvard. Economics Ph.D. Alumnus, Merton Kirk Cameron, 1921

 

After graduating from Princeton, Merton K. Cameron taught high-school Latin, Greek and History before going on for graduate work in economic history at Harvard University where he co-taught courses in the economics of transportation and the economics corporations with Professor William Z. Ripley in 1915-16.

From his obituary in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin (23 May 1952, p. 5) we learn that he retired from the University of Hawaii in August, 1949 because of ill health and then moved with his family to California. It was reported that Cameron was “a member of the Honolulu Chamber of Commerce, Phi Gamma Delta, American Association of University Professors, Phi Kappa Phi, Pi Gamma Mu, National Association of Cost Accountanats and the American Economics Association.”

Merton Kirk Cameron was born 7 January 1886 in Cecil County, Maryland and died 22 May 1952 in San Gabriel, California.

_________________

Harvard Economics Ph.D., 1921

Merton Kirk Cameron, A.B. (Princeton Univ.) 1908, A.M. (Harvard Univ.) 1914.

Subject, Economics. Special Field, Economic History. Thesis, “The History of Tobacco-Growing in the Ohio Valley.”
Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Oregon.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1920-21, p. 60.

_________________

Summer School, Berkeley 1932

Merton Kirk Cameron, Ph.D., Professor of Economics and Head of the Department of Economics and Business, University of Hawaii.

A.B., Princeton University, 1908; M.A., 1914, Ph.D., 1921, Harvard University. Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Oregon, 1920-23, Associate Professor, 1923-28; Professor of Economics, University of Hawaii, since 1928.
Author: Experience of Oregon with Popular Election and Recall of Public Service Commissioners; Some Neglected Aspects of the Problem of Poverty; The Political Pressure on the State Commissioners; Some Economic Causes of the Backward Condition in the Ante-Bellum Ohio Valley Tobacco District.

Source: University of California, Intersession and Summer Session, 1932 at Berkeley. (Officers of Administration and Instruction, Visiting Instructors), p. 4.

_________________

From the Princeton Alumni Weekly (1952)
Memorial

Merton Cameron, Ph.D., educator and author of many scientific books and articles on sociological and economic studies, died on May 22, 1952 at his home in San Gabriel, Calif. For the past 30 years prior to his retirement in 1950 he was professor of Economics and chairman of the Dept. of Economics and Business at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. During World War II following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor he was active in defense work in Honolulu, both in directing the construction of bomb shelters and as an expert on finger prints. At that time his wife, Margaret, served in the Honolulu Office of Censorship.

Froggy, as he was affectionately known in college, elected teaching as a career, having served on the faculties of several U.S. schools including the Lanier High School in Maryland, the Donald Fraser School of Decatur, Ga. [ca. 1908], and the Riverside Military Academy at Gainesville, Ga. [ca. 1911], before accepting an offer from the University of Hawaii. He was one of those rare teachers who was not only a master of his subject but able to arouse enthusiastic response and admiration from his pupils.

Surviving in addition to his wife, Mrs. Margaret Elizabeth Sullivan Cameron, are a son, Merton K. Jr.; a daughter Edith, wife of Col. Kenneth R. Kenerick and two grandchildren, Karen J. Kenerick and Kaye Elizabeth Kenerick.

To the members of his family who survive the Class extends its sincere sympathy.

For the Class of 1908
Robert C. Clothier, President
Courtland N. Smith, Secretary

Source: Princeton Alumni Weekly, July 4, 1952, p. 34.

Image Source: University of Hawaii Yearbook, 1936.

Categories
Economists Princeton

Princeton. Oskar Morgenstern and John von Neumann as Beach Buddies

 

Friend of Economics in the Rear-view Mirror, Karin Papp, has provided us a copy of this photo of Oskar Morgenstern (her father) and John von Neumann dressed for the beach. The history of economics is one digital artifact richer, thank you Karin!

I propose we give this snapshot the title “The Theory of Games: Beach Blanket Bingo edition”.

Incidentally, Oskar Morgenstern was named #38 in the Economists Wearing Bowties collection of this blog.

Categories
Economists Harvard Policy Princeton Williams

Harvard. Economics PhD Alumnus. Donald Holmes Wallace, 1931

 

The previous post included lists of books used for undergraduate and graduate courses dealing with the economics of railroad regulation taught at Harvard in the mid-1930s. The list was put together by Donald Holmes Wallace who was a recent Harvard Ph.D. graduate and soon to be appointed to an assistant professorship in economics.

His career was cut short at age 50 by a heart attack. His early promise was recognized with the award of the prestigious David A. Wells prize for his 1931 dissertation on the aluminum industry.

________________________

Ph.D. 1931

Donald Holmes Wallace, A.B. 1924, A.M. 1928.

Subject, Economics. Special Field, Economics of Corporate Organization. Thesis, “The Aluminum Monopoly in the United States.”

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1930-31, p. 120.

________________________

Donald Holmes Wallace
(1903-1953)

Born in West Chester, PA, June 29, 1903.

1924. A.B. Harvard.

1924. Taught at the Suffield school in Suffield, CT.

1925. Instructor in economics at the University of Vermont.

1926-27. Assistant in economics at Harvard

1927-36. Instructor and tutor in economics at Harvard.

1928. A.M., Harvard.

1931. Ph.D., Harvard. Thesis: The Aluminum Monopoly in the United States.
Awarded the David A. Wells dissertation prize 1933-34.

1931-32. Year in Europe funded by a Social Science Research Council grant.

1937. Revised version of dissertation published by Harvard University Press: Market Control in the Aluminum Industry.  “The present study first took partial form as a doctoral dissertation (presented in 1931) upon the aluminum monopoly in the United States. Thereafter, the scope of the inquiry was widened to include market control in Europe and international relations in this industry.”–Preface.

1937-39. Assistant professor of economics at Harvard

1939. Associate professor of economics at Williams.

1939. Part-time economist for the Department of Labor

1940. Consultant of the National Defense Advisory Commission

1941. Consultant of the Office of Price Administration

1942-43. Director of OPA industrial manufacturing price division.

1943, Summer. Acting deputy administrator for prices of OPA.

1943-1945. (He resigned from Williams in 1945) Economic adviser to the deputy price administrator.

1945-1953. American Economic Association’s representative on the National Bureau of Economic Research.

1946-47. Member of the staff of the Council of Economic Advisers.

1948. Hired by Princeton “to inaugurate the graduate study program of Woodrow Wilson School, as well as apppointment as Professor of Economics.

1951. Vice-President of the American Economic Association.

1953, September 19. Died in Princeton, NJ. [Final position: Director of the Graduate Program of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs]

SourceNorth Adams Transcript (MA), September 21, 1943, p. 3; Eveline M. Burns “In Memoriam, Donald Holmes Wallace”, AER, Papers and Proceedings (May, 1954), p. 696.

Image Source: Dr. Donald H. Wallace. Head Economic Analyst, Office of Price Administration (OPA) and Civilian Supply. From the Farm Security Administration/Office of War Information Photograph Collection. Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, Washington, D.C.

 

Categories
Brown Chicago Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Economics Programs Harvard Illinois Kansas M.I.T. Michigan Michigan State Minnesota Ohio State Pennsylvania Princeton Purdue Rochester Swarthmore Vanderbilt Vassar Virginia Washington University Wellesley Williams Wisconsin Yale

United States. Courses of Study of Political Economy. 1876 and 1892-93.

 

The first article in the inaugural issue of The Journal of Political Economy, “Courses of Study in Political Economy in the United States in 1876 and in 1892-93,” was written by the founding head of the University of Chicago’s department of political economy, J. Laurence Laughlin. This post provides Laughlin’s appendix that provided information about economics courses taught in 65 colleges/universities in the United States during the last quarter of the 19th century. The bottom line of the table is that “aggregate hours of instruction in 1892-3 [were] more than six times the hours of instruction given in 1876”.

__________________________

How little Political Economy and Finance were taught only fifteen years ago, as compared with the teaching of to-day, must be surprising even to those who have lived and taught in the subject during that period…. At the close of the war courses of economic study had practically no existence in the university curriculum; in short, the studious pursuit of economics in our universities is scarcely twenty years old. These considerations alone might be reasons why economic teaching has not yet been able to color the thinking of our more than sixty millions of people. But about the close of the first century of our national existence it may be said that the study of Political Economy entered upon a new and striking development. This is certainly the marked characteristic of the study of Political Economy in the last fifteen years. How great this has been may be seen from the tables giving the courses of study, respectively, in about 60 institutions in the year 1876 and in 1892-3. (See Appendix I.) The aggregate hours of instruction in 1892-3 are more than six times the hours of instruction given in 1876.” [Laughlin, p. 4]

__________________________

Courses of Study in Political Economy in the United States in 1876 and in 1892-93.

Note: Returns could not be obtained from Johns Hopkins University, Amherst College, and some other institutions.

Institution.

Description of Courses.

1876.

1892-3.

No. hours per week.

No. weeks in year. No. hours per week.

No. weeks in year.

University of Alabama.

Text Book and Lectures, Senior Year

Finance and Taxation

4

2

36

36

[Total hours of instruction per year] 216
Boston University. Principles of Political Economy 3 20
[Total hours of instruction per year] 60
Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine.

Elementary (Required)

Advanced (Elective)

5

14

4

4

12

10

[Total hours of instruction per year] 70 88
Brown University, Providence, R. I.

Elementary

History of Econ. Thought

Advanced Course

[2nd] Advanced Course

Seminary of History, Pol. Sci., and Pol. Econ.

16-17

3

3

3

3

2

33-34

11-12

11

11

23

[Total hours of instruction per year] 40-42½ 242-250
University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. 1.     Introductory Political Economy

2.     Descriptive Political Economy

3.     Advanced Political Economy

4.     Industrial and Economic History

5.     Scope and Method

6.     History of Political Economy

7.     Unsettled Problems

8.     Socialism

9.     Social Economics

10.   Practical Economics

11.   Statistics

12.   Railway Transportation

13.   Tariff History of U.S.

14.   Financial History of U.S.

15.   Taxation

16.   Public Debts

17.   Seminary

5

4

5

4

4

5

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

12

12

12

24

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

36

[Total hours of instruction per year] 996
Colby University, Waterville, Maine.

Elementary [1st]

Elementary [2nd]

Theoretical

Historical

5

7

2

2

4

4

13

10

13

10

[Total hours of instruction per year] 35 138
Columbia College (School of Political Science, New York City. 1.     Principles of Political Economy (Element.)

2.     Historical Practical Political Economy (Advanced)

3.     History of Economic Theory (Advanced)

4.     Public Finance (Adv.)

5.     Railroad Problems (Adv.)

6.     Finan. History of U.S. (Adv.)

7.     Tariff History of U.S. (Adv.)

8.     Science of Statistics (Adv.)

9.     Communism and Socialism (Adv.)

10.   Taxation and Distribution (Adv.)

11.   Seminarium in Political Economy (Element.)

12.   Seminarium in Public Finance and Economy (Adv.)

13.   Law of Taxation (Adv.)

3 and 5, 6 and 7, 8 and 9
given in alternate years.

2

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

2

 

3

2

 

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

 

 

2

2

17

 

34

34

 

34

25

34

17

34

34

17

34

 

34

17

[Total hours of instruction per year] 34 764
Columbian University, Washington, D.C. Elements of Political Economy 5 8
[Total hours of instruction per year] 40
Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. 1.     Elementary Political Economy

2.     Advanced Political Economy

3.     Finance

4.     Financial History

5.     Railroad Problems

6.     Currency and Banking

7.     Economic History

8.     Statistics

2

11

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

34

34

34

13

11

10

34

34

[Total hours of instruction per year] 22 408
Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. 1.     Elementary

2.     Advanced

3.     Advanced Finance and Tariff

6

6

6

6

6

6 2/3

4 1/6

3 1/3

[Total hours of instruction per year] 36 85
University of Denver, Col. 1.     Ely’s Introduction

2.     Ingram’s History

3.     Gilman’s Profit-Sharing

4.     Ely, Labor Movement in America

5.     Kirkup’s and Rae’s Socialism

6.     Finance and Taxation

7.     International Commerce

2

1

1

2

2

4

2

15

5

5

5

5

5

5

[Total hours of instruction per year] 90
DePauw University, Greencastle, Ind.

Economics (Elementary)

Seminarium (Advanced)

4

12

4

2

18

36

[Total hours of instruction per year] 48 144
Drury College, Springfield, Mo. Elementary Course 5 6 5 12
[Total hours of instruction per year] 30 60
Emory College, Oxford, Ga. Jevons’ Text, and Lectures. 5 12
[Total hours of instruction per year] 60
Franklin and Marshall College. Political Economy, (Walker’s) 2 15 2 20
[Total hours of instruction per year] 30 40
Georgetown College, Ky. 1.     General Economics

2.     Special Topics

5

15

3

3

20

20

[Total hours of instruction per year] 75 120
Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 1.     Introductory

2.     Theory (Advanced)

3.     Economic History from 1763

4.     Railway Transportation

5.     Tariff History of U.S.

6.     Taxation and Public Debts

7.     Financial Hist. of U.S.

8.     Condition of Workingmen

9.     Economic Hist. to 1763

10.   History of Theory to Adam Smith

Seminary

3

3

30

30

3

3

3

3

2

3

2

3

3

2

2

30

30

30

15

15

30

15

30

30

15

30

[Total hours of instruction per year] 180 735
Haverford College, Pa. Economic Theory 2 40
[Total hours of instruction per year] 80
Howard University, Washington, D. C. Elementary 5 10 5 10
[Total hours of instruction per year] 50 50
Illinois College and Whipple Academy, Jacksonville, Ill. Newcomb’s Polit. Economy, Seniors 5 15
[Total hours of instruction per year] 75
University of Illinois, Champaign, Ill. Senior Class 5 11 5 11
[Total hours of instruction per year] 55 55
Iowa College, Grinnell, Iowa.

Political Economy

Taxation

Railroad Problems

Socialism

5

10

3

3

3

3

37

14

12

11

[Total hours of instruction per year] 50 222
State University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Elements of Economics

Currency and Banking

Industrial Revolutions of 18th Century

Recent Econ. History and Theory

Railroads, Pub. Regulation of

Seminary in Polit. Econ.

5

 

14

 

5

5

2

 

2

2

1

14

11

14

 

11

10

35

[Total hours of instruction per year] 70 230
Kansas State Agricultural College, Manhattan, Kan. Elementary, 4th year 5 8 5 11
[Total hours of instruction per year] 40 55
Kansas State University, Lawrence, Kansas. 1.     Elements of Political Economy

2.     Applied Economics

3.     Statistics

4.     Land Tenures

5.     Finance

5

19

5

3

2

2

2

19

19

19

19

19

[Total hours of instruction per year] 95 266
Lake Forest University, Lake Forest, Ill. 1.     Elementary

2.     Advanced

3

11

3

3

16

13

[Total hours of instruction per year] 33 87
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Mass. 1.     Political Economy, Elem., Junior Year

2.     Financial Hist. of U.S., Jun. and Sen. Year

3.     Taxation, Junior and Senior Year

4.     History of Commerce

5.     History of Industry, Junior and Senior Year.

6.     Socialism, etc. (Option), Jun. and Sen. Year

7.     History of Economic Theory (Opt.), Senior

8.     Statistics and Graphic Methods, Junior

9.     Statistics and Sociology (Option) Senior

2

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

3

3

 

3

3

 

3

2

 

2

3

15

15

 

15

15

 

15

15

 

15

15

[Total hours of instruction per year] 30 375
Michigan Agricultural College. Primary Course 5 12
[Total hours of instruction per year] 60
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 1.     Elements of Political Economy

2.     Elements of Political Economy

3.     Hist. Devel. of Industr. Society

4.     Finance

5.     Problems in Pol. Econ

6.     Transportation Problem

7.     Land Tenure and Agrarian Movements

8.     Socialism and Communism

9.     Currency and Banking

10.   Tariff History of U.S.

11.   Indust. and Comm. Develop. of U.S.

12.   History of Pol. Econ.

13.   Statistics

15.   Economic Thought

16.   Labor and Monopoly Problems

17.   Seminary in Finance

18.   Seminary in Economics

20.   Social Philosophy with Economic Relations

21.   Current Econ. Legislation and Literature

 

18

 

3

4

3

4

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

2

1

 

2

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

 

18

[Total hours of instruction per year] 45 756
Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont. 1.     Elementary (Junior Class)

2.     Advanced (Senior Class)

3.     Finance (Senior Class)

4.     Seminary

4

4

10

10

3

2

2

1

35

21

14

21

[Total hours of instruction per year] 80 196
University of Minnesota. 1.     Elementary

2.     Advanced

3.     Am. Pub. Economy

4.     Undergraduate Seminary

5.     Graduate Seminary

5

13

4

4

4

2

1

13

13

10

23

36

[Total hours of instruction per year] 65 226
University of Mississippi, University, Miss. Advanced 5 30
[Total hours of instruction per year] 150
Mt. Holyoke College, South Hadley, Mass.

Polit. Econ. (General)

Polit. Econ. Seminary

4

2

12

12

[Total hours of instruction per year] 72
College of New Jersey at Princeton.

Pol. Econ. (Elem., Elective)

Pol. Econ. (Elem., Required)

Finance (Elective)

Historics—Econ. Semin.

2

13

2

2

2

16

16

15

[Total hours of instruction per year] 26 94
College of the City of New York. 16
[Total hours of instruction per year] 48*
New Hampshire College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, Hanover, N. H. Elementary—Perry or Walker 4 10-12 5 10
[Total hours of instruction per year] 48 50
Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio. 1.     Elementary Polit. Econ.

2.     Advanced Polit. Econ.

3.     Finance

4.     History Econ. Thought

5.     Economic and Social Problems

6.     “Money,” etc.

5

12

5

5

3

3

3

2

11

12

25

13

12

36

[Total hours of instruction per year] 60 337
Ohio State University.

Elementary

Advanced

Finance

Seminary (Indust. History)

2

2

2

2

38

26

12

38

[Total hours of instruction per year] 228
Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, Ohio. 4 12 4 12
[Total hours of instruction per year] 48 48
Penn. Military Academy, Chester, Penn. Elementary 5 13
[Total hours of instruction per year] 65
University of Pennsylvania, Wharton, School of Finance and Economy, Philadelphia, Penn. 1.     Grad. Course in Finance

2.     Grad. Course in Theoretical Polit. Econ.

3.     Grad. Course in Statistics

4.     Elem. Course in Finance

5.     Elem. Course in Theoret. Polit. Econ.

6.     Elem. Course in Statistics

7.     Elem. Course in Practical Polit. Econ.

8.     Course in Money

9.     Course in Banking

10.   Advanced Course in Political Economy

11.   Economic History of Europe

12.   Grad. Course in Practical Polit. Econ.

13.   Econ. and Fin. History of U.S.

14.   Grad. Econ. History of the U.S.

15.   Grad. English Econ. History from 13th to 17th century

16.   Modern Econ. History.

 

 

1

2

3

3

2

2

2

2

1

2

3

2

2

4

 

3

3

30

30

30

30

30

15

15

15

30

30

30

30

30

30

 

30

30

[Total hours of instruction per year] 1020
Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind. Elementary Course 3 19
[Total hours of instruction per year] 57
Randolph Macon College, Ashland, Va. Elementary 2 32 2 32
[Total hours of instruction per year] 64 64
University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y.

Elementary

Econ. Polit. History U.S.

5

14

5

1

14

20

[Total hours of instruction per year] 70 90
Rutger’s College. Polit. Econ. (Elementary) 3 12 4 22
[Total hours of instruction per year] 36 88
Smith College, Northampton, Mass.

Elementary Course

Adv. Course in Theory

Seminarium

Practical Studies

3

12

3

3

2

2

14

14

10

12

[Total hours of instruction per year] 36 128
South Carolina College, Columbia, S.C.

Polit. Econ. Senior Class

Applied Polit. Econ.

2

2

40

20

[Total hours of instruction per year] 120
Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Penn.

Polit. Econ. (Walker)

Finance

Protection and Free Trade

Money and Banking

History of Econ. Theories

4

4

4

4

4

20

10

10

10

10

[Total hours of instruction per year] 240
Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y.

Elementary

Finance

Industrial Development since 1850

Seminary

3

2

2

2

14

10

12

38

[Total hours of instruction per year] 162
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn.

Elementary

Advanced (Post-Graduate)

3

2

20

Varies

[Total hours of instruction per year] 100?
University of Texas, Austin, Texas. General 3 36
[Total hours of instruction per year] 108
Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut.

Elementary

Advanced

Finance

4

13

3

4

2

17

17

17

[Total hours of instruction per year] 52 153
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Political Economy, Elementary

Political Economy, Advanced

3

36

3

3

36

36

[Total hours of instruction per year] 108 216
Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York.

Principles of Economics

Economic History

Railroads, Trusts, and Relation of State to Monopolies

Labor Problem and Socialism

Seminary

 

 

3

3

2

 

2

2

18

18

18

 

18

18

[Total hours of instruction per year] 216
University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.

Elementary

Advanced

3

2

20

20

[Total hours of instruction per year] 100
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.

Theory of Economics

Science of Society

3

26

3

16

16

[Total hours of instruction per year] 78 88
Washington and Jefferson College, Washington, Pa. Political Economy 3 11 3 16
[Total hours of instruction per year] 33 48
Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Va.

Elementary

Advanced

3

3

14

26

[Total hours of instruction per year] 120
Washington University, St. Louis. Prescribed Course 3 20 3 20
[Total hours of instruction per year] 60 60
Wellesley College, Wellesley, Mass.

Industrial History

Economic Theory

Statistics (Seminary)

Socialism (Seminary)

3

3

3

3

18

18

18

18

[Total hours of instruction per year] 216
Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut.

General Introductory (Sen.)

General Introductory (Jun.)

Economic Problems

36

2

3

2

36

18

36

[Total hours of instruction per year] 54 198
West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Elementary Pol. Economy

Advanced Pol. Economy

2

2

14

36

[Total hours of instruction per year] 100
Williams College, Williamstown, Mass. Political Economy 6 14 3 15
[Total hours of instruction per year] 84 45
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.

Econ. Seminary

Distribution of Wealth

History of Pol. Econ.

Money

Public Finance

Statistics

Recent Econ. Theories

Synoptical Lectures

Outlines of Economics

2

5

5

5

3

3

3

1

4

37

14½

12

10½

37

12

14½

15

37

[Total hours of instruction per year] 612½
Yale University, New Haven, Conn.

Pol. Econ.**—Elem. (2)

Pol. Econ.—Adv. (3)

Economic History (2)

Finance, Public (2)

Finance, Corporate (2)

Mathematical Theory (1)

Seminary Instruction (2)

3

2

 

36

36

36

4

3

4

2

3

1

1

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

[Total hours of instruction per year] 180 648

* [College of the City of New York] A few hours additional are given in the work of the Department of Philosophy; the whole number amounting to some 52 or 53.

** [Yale University] Figures in brackets represent numbers of courses under each head.

SourceAppendix I to “The Study of Political Economy in the United States” by J. Laurence Laughlin, The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 1, no. 1 (December, 1892), pp. 143-151.

Image Source:  J. Laurence Laughlin drawn in the University of Chicago yearbook Cap and Gown (1907), p. 208.

 

 

Categories
AEA Berkeley Chicago Cornell Economist Market Economists Johns Hopkins M.I.T. Princeton Stanford Yale

M.I.T. Memo regarding potential hires to interview at AEA Dec meeting, 1965

 

This artifact provides us a glimpse into the demand side of the market for assistant professors of economics in the United States as seen from one of the mid-1960’s peak departments. The chairperson of the M.I.T. economics department at the time, E. Cary Brown, apparently conducted a quick survey of fellow department heads and packed his results into a memo for his colleagues who in one capacity or the other would be attending the annual meeting of the American Economic Association held in New York City in the days following the Christmas holidays of December 1965. The absence of Harvard names in the memo probably only indicates that Brown presumed his colleagues were well aware of any potential candidates coming from farther up the Charles River.

From Brown’s memo, Duncan Foley (Yale) and Miguel Sidrauski (Chicago) ended up on the M.I.T. faculty as assistant professors for the 1966-67 academic year. John Williamson was a visiting assistant professor that year too.

_____________________________

Dating the Memo

The folder label in the M.I.T. archives incorrectly gives the date Dec. 28-30, 1969, where the 1969 has been added in pencil.

Two keys for dating the memo.  Brown’s comment to John Williamson (York): “Wants a semester here, Jan.-June 1967″.  “Solow is hearing paper at meetings” (Conlisk of Stanford) who presented in the invited doctoral dissertation session “The Analysis and Testing of the Asymptotic Behavior of Aggregate Growth Models” (affiliation given as Rice University (Ph.D., Stanford University) where Solow was listed as a discussant. AEA’s 78th Annual Meeting was held in New York City at the end of December 1965.

_____________________________

Memo from E. Cary Brown to M.I.T. faculty going to Dec. 1965 AEA meeting

[Pencil note: “Put in beginning of 1966-7”]

Memorandum Regarding Personnel Interviews in New York

To: Department Members Attending AEA Convention
From: E. C. Brown

University of Chicago

Sidrauski, Miguel (26). International Trade, Monetary Theory, Economic Growth, Mathematical Economics

Thesis—“Studies in the Theory of Growth and Inflation” under Uzawa
References: Harberger, Johnson, Lewis

[He came here a year ago to ask about a short-term appointment before he returned to Argentina. Griliches believes him to be tops. Had him in class myself and he was first rate. Called him on phone last week and he still wants to be had.]

 

Thornber, Edgar H. (24). [H. = Hodson] Econometrics, Mathematical Methods, Computers

Thesis—“A Distributed Lag Model: Bayes vs. Sampling Theory Analyses” under Telser
References: Griliches, Zellner

[Supposed to be equal of Sidrauski. Heavily computer oriented. Doesn’t sound interesting for us, but we should talk to him.]

 

Treadway, Arthur. Mathematical Economist

Thesis on the investment function

[A younger man who, according to Svi [sic], regards himself as the equal of the above. Stronger in mathematics, and very high grades. Wasn’t on market because thesis didn’t appear as completable. Now it seems that it will be and he wants consideration.]

 

Evenson, Robert E. (31). Agricultural Economics and Economic Growth, Public Finance

Thesis—“Contribution of Agricultural Experiment Station Research to Agricultural Production” under Schultz
References: Gale Johnson, Berg

[He is just slightly below the others. Mature and very solid and combines agriculture and economic growth where we need strength.]

 

Gould, John (26).

(Ph.D. in Business School)

[Bud Fackler mentioned him as their best. Uzawa and Griliches are trying to get the Econ. Dept. to hire him. Franco knows him and is after him.]

 

Princeton

Klevorick, Alvin (22). Mathematical Economics, Econometrics, Economic Theory

Thesis: “Mathematical Programming and the Problem of Capital Budgeting under Uncertainty” (Quandt)
References: Baumol, Kuhn

[Apparently the best they have had for some time. Young and very brash.]

 

Monsma, George N. (24). Labor Economics, Economics of Medical Care, Public Finance

Thesis: Supply and Demand for Medical Personnel” (Harbison)
References: Patterson, Machlup

[Dick Lester was high on him. While not a traditional labor economist, he works that field.]

Silber, William L. (23). Monetary Economics, Public Finance, Econometrics

Thesis: “Structure of Interest Rates” (Chandler)
References: Goldfeld, Musgrave, Quandt

[One of their best four. Not sure he sounds like what we want in fields, however.]

 

Grabowski, Henry G. (25). Research and Development, Econometrics, Mathematical Economics

Thesis: “Determinants and Profitability of Industrial Research and Development” (Quandt)
References: Morgenstern, Baumol

[Lester says he is good all around man. His field makes him especially interesting.]

 

Stanford

Conlisk [John]— Economic growth and development

[Arrow has written about him, recommending him highly. His field should be interesting. Solow is hearing paper at meetings.]

 

Bradford [David Frantz]— Public finance

[Has been interviewed up here, but more should see him who wish to.]

 

Yale

Foley [Duncan Karl] (Probably not at meetings. Best Tobin’s had.]

Bryant [Ralph Clement] (Now at Federal Reserve Board. Number 2 for Tobin]

 

York

Williamson, John

[Wants a semester here, Jan.-June 1967. Alan Peacock at meetings.]

 

Johns Hopkins

[Ask Bill Oakland]

 

University of California, Berkeley

[Ask Aaron Gordon or Tibor Scitovsky.]

 

Cornell

Bridge [John L.] — Econometrics, Foreign Trade

Lindert [Peter]— International Economics

[Their two best as indicated in their letter to Department Chairman.]

 

Buffalo

Mathis, E.J. [Ask Mitch Horwitz if it’s worth pursuing.]

 

Columbia U.

[Ask Bill Vickrey]

 

Pittsburgh

Miller, Norman C. (26). International Economics; Money, Macro, Micro and Math Economics

Thesis: “Capital Flows and International Trade Theory” (Whitman)
References: Marina Whitman, Jacob Cohen, Peter Kenen, Graeme Dorrance

[Letter to Evsey Domar from Mark Perlman (Chm.) recommending him to us for further training.]

 

Source: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute Archives and Special Collections. MIT Department of Economics records, Box 1, Folder “AEA Chairmen MEETING—Dec. 28-30, 1969 (sic)”.

Image Sources:  Duncan Foley (left) from his home page. Miguel Sidrauski (right) from the History of Economic Thought website.

Categories
Chicago Economists Princeton

Chicago to Princeton. Jacob Viner’s Resignation Letter, 1946

 

 

Jacob Viner was 53 years old when he decided to leave the University of Chicago for Princeton. The letter transcribed below presents the personal and professional reasons for his resignation. Viner’s letter reveals the soft note of a late mid-life crisis motivating the move — no need for a new wife and fancy sports car, but rather the scholar sought retreat to an ivory-tower library, comfort from the families of his adult children and a significantly shorter commute to points East. 

___________________

Resignation Letter of Jacob Viner

COPY SENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON INSTRUCTION AND RESEARCH.
ORIGINAL TO MISS STROMWALL

 

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
Chicago 37, Illinois
Department of Economics

January 24, 1946

Chancellor Robert M. Hutchins
Office of the Central Administration
Faculty Exchange

Dear Mr. Hutchins:

I am sorry to have to tell you that I am hereby resigning from the University of Chicago as of the end of this academic year to take a professorship at Princeton University. As I am to be at the London School of Economics from April to July, I am leaving the University in March, on leave without pay for the spring quarter.

The Princeton offer first came to me over a year ago, and I definitely declined it twice. It has been renewed and I now have definitely accepted it. For many reasons the offer had great attractions for me from the start, and I am sure that it was loyalty to Chicago which led me at first to decline it — as was true also in the case of Yale. I have been associated with the University of Chicago for 30 years, and the University has always treated me, both before and since your regime, with the utmost generosity. I have never in the thirty years had any cause to feel a personal grievance against you, or any other administrative officer, or any colleague. I am not leaving because of any dissatisfaction with the way the University has treated me, or with my colleagues, with you, or with any of your aides. I did disapprove at times of some aspects of what I thought to be your policy for the University. I still do on some points. But I had my full day in court; and my disapproval of some of your ideas — which it is not impossible that I misunderstood — never carried with it any lessening of my respect for yourself, or any ill-will toward you, and was always accompanied by enthusiastic approval of other of your educational ideas. I have been very happy about the way the new Council of the University has been operating, and if there were any criticism I would venture to offer of your behavior as its presiding officer, it would be that you have been too self-effacing and have not given as much leadership as the Council would welcome and would benefit from. I assure you that when I leave it will be with the friendliest feeling toward you and with strong affection for the University which I so cherish and which has dealt so kindly with me.

Why then am I leaving? A variety of factors have played their part. Most important, probably, is that our children, although born here, never took root in Chicago, that our daughter is already living in New York, and that our son, when he gets out of the Coast Guard, is sure of only one thing, that he will not live in Chicago. They have been pressing us very hard to move East, and what with their four years at eastern colleges, Arthur’s military service, and Ellen’s removal to New York, we have not been able to have the family together except for very short intervals over a period of some seven years. While we don’t expect them to live in Princeton, we do hope that we will at least have them frequently for week-end and vacation guests.

As for myself, as I get older, the physical aspects of the routines of teaching and of committees, of inadequate secretarial help, of a library physically difficult to use, and of frequent inescapable trips East, have grown progressively more burdensome to me. I know that as time goes on, these matters will become still more important to me. In the past ten years I have done what looks to me like a great deal of research, but most of it was done while I was on leave of absence from the University and I have put little of it into print. Even when I was in Washington, the secretarial and library privileges I had enabled me to do nearly as much of my personal research in my spare time as I could do in all my time while at the University.

It is not that the University imposed unfair burdens on me. Some of my heaviest chores were self-imposed. But at Chicago I did not want special privileges which equally-deserving colleagues did not have, and some of the things I wanted badly I would for this reason not have accepted at Chicago if they had been offered to me. At Princeton I come now, without obligations going beyond my contract, and with no reason for not accepting all the facilities voluntarily offered me. If after a while I should acquire Princeton loyalties which consume time and energy, I will at least have had a long spell during which I had been free to realize some of my ambitions as a scholar. I want to be able to get some of my accumulated research into shape for print, and if I don’t succeed, it will not be Princeton’s fault, provided it delivers on all the things I have been promised. These things are not financial: my salary will be the same at Princeton as here, and was not an issue. It’s all a matter of easy access to a library easy to use, light teaching load, no journal to edit, no burdensome eastern trips for committees, government advice, work on eastern library collections, etc., a secretary, a research assistant, a good office layout, and so forth. As I could not ask you to build a new library building for me, or to give me facilities that my colleagues could not get, or to transfer the University to the East, I thought it would be easier for all concerned if I did not let anyone here  know about my negotiations.

I may be wrong in deciding that I will be happier and a more productive scholar at Princeton. No matter how well things go there, I know that I will always have a warm feeling for Chicago and a regret that I did not prove to be one of those rare creatures: a professor who passed all his working life at a single institution of which he was not a graduate. I will always be ready upon request to render any service to the University within my power, and I will carry out scrupulously my obligations to Chicago students who are working on theses under my direction or have any other claims upon me.

I hope it will be satisfactory to you if President Dodds announces my appointment on February 1st. I think it only fair to resign at once as a member of the Council and also as a member of the Social Science Research Committee where I would be participating in the making of decisions without staying to take the blame should there be any. I will continue on my other committees at your pleasure and the pleasure of their Chairmen until I leave.

I have never written an academic letter of resignation before. If there is any further action I need to take, I trust you will let me know. I am sending a copy of this letter to Dean Redfield, who has also deserved better of me.

Very sincerely yours,
/a/ Jacob Viner

JF-w

Source: University of Chicago Library, Special Collections Research Center. Office of the President, Hutchins Administration Records 1892-1951. Box 73, Folder “Economics Department, 1946-1950”.

___________________

Noted Economist Is Appointed To Princeton Staff

Princeton, Feb. 27. The appointment of Professor Jacob Viner, of the University of Chicago, internationally known as one of America’s most distinguished economists and editor of the “Journal of Political Economy,” to the faculty of Princeton University was announced today by President Harold W. Dodds. He will join the Princeton faculty next September.

“The addition of Professor Viner to the Department of Economics and Social institutions will contribute to the attractiveness of the university as a center of under graduate and post-graduate studies. President Dodds said. “He is distinguished as a professor and as an economist in the fields of international finance and trade. The program of our International Finance Section will benefit, but his usefulness to the university will not be limited to the activities of the section. He is a scholar whose Interests embrace the whole field of economics.”

Professor Viner, a native of Montreal, received his B.A. degree from McGill University in 1914; his M.A. from Harvard University in 1915, his Ph.D. from Harvard in 1922 and an LL.D. degree from Lawrence College in 1941.

He was a professor of economics at the University of Chicago, 1916-17; special expert with the U.S. Tariff Commission, 1917-19, and the U.S. Shipping Board during part of 1918. He returned to the University of Chicago in 1919 as an assistant professor of economics, was appointed associate professor in 1923 and professor in 1925. Since 1940 he has been Morton Hull Distinguished Service Professor at that institution.

Meanwhile, he has served variously as visiting professor at the Institute Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales, Geneva. Switzerland, 1930-31 and 1933-34 visiting professor at Yale University, 1942-43; special assistant to the Secretary of the Treasury, dur[ing] part of 1934; consulting expert to the U.S. Treasury, 1935-39; special assistant to the Secretary of the Treasury during parts of 1939 and 1942; and consultant U.S. Department of State since 1943.

Professor Viner is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Philosophical Society. He is a member and former president of the American Economical [sic] Association and the author of: “Dumping a Problem in International Trade”; “Canada’s Balance of International Indebtedness”; “Studies in the Theory of International Trade”; and numerous articles on economic subjects.

Source: The Morning Call (Paterson, N.J.), February 28, 1946. Page 7.

Image Source: Jacob Viner (left); Theodore W. Schultz (right).  University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf1-07483, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.

Categories
Princeton Suggested Reading Syllabus

Princeton. Syllabus and bibliography for public finance. Daniels, 1895

 

 

An original copy of the following twenty page, printed syllabus in public finance for Professor Winthrop More Daniels’ lectures on public finance at Princeton for 1895-96 can apparently be found in the Columbia University Library. According to a handwritten note on the back of the title page, this syllabus was a gift of Professor E.R.A. Seligman.

This post includes some biographical information together with a transcription of the full twenty page syllabus. At the very end of the post you will find links to all the collateral readings as well as the items included in Daniels’ bibliography of “authorities”.

______________________

DANIELS, Winthrop More, 1867-

WINTHROP MORE DANIELS, A.M., Professor of Political Economy at Princeton, was born in Dayton, Ohio, September 30, 1867, son of Edwin Arthur and Mary Billings (Kilburn) Daniels, natives of Massachusetts, but of English ancestry. On the maternal side he is descended from Thomas Kilborne (the common ancestor of all the Kilburns in this country) who was born in the parish of Wood Ditton, County of Cambridge, in 1578, whence he migrated to New England in 1635. The Daniels family came to this country and settled in Massachusetts sometime in the seventeenth century. His early education was obtained at home in the Dayton Public Schools, and at Deaver Collegiate Institute. He was graduated at Princeton in the Class of 1888, and spent part of that year and of the years 1890 and 1891 in foreign travel. He was a teacher of classics in the Princeton Preparatory School in 1888, which position he filled for two years, when he went abroad, and spent two semesters at the University of Leipsic, Germany, studying economics and history. Returning to this country in 1891, he was appointed Instructor in Economics and Social Science at Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, remaining there for a year, when, in 1892, he was chosen Professor of Political Economy at Princeton, which position he now holds. Professor Daniels is a member of the Reform Club of New York City, the Nassau and Colonial Clubs of Princeton, and a member of the American Economic Association. He is independent in politics, and has made addresses favoring a revenue tariff and opposing free silver. He was married in 1898 to Joan Robertson of Montville, Connecticut. He has recently published a treatise entitled Elements of Public Finance.

Source: Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, ed., Universities and their Sons: History, Influence and Characteristics of American Universities, with biographical sketches and Portraits of Alumni and Recipients of Honorary Degrees, Vol. 2 (Boston, 1899) p. 71.

______________________

Obituary for Winthrop More Daniels, 1944

M. Daniels Dies; Former Head of ICC

Saybrook Man Succeeded Woodrow Wilson as Professor at Wesleyan and Princeton

Saybrook, Jan. 3.—(AP)—Winthrop More Daniels, 77, transportation expert who succeeded President Woodrow Wilson in professorship at Wesleyan and Princeton and later served under him in New Jersey as a public utility commissioner and in Washington as chairman of the Interstate Commerce Commission, died yesterday after a brief illness.

Daniels, who retired as professor of transportation at Yale several years ago, was a native of Dayton, O., and was an author of numerous books, including a history of American Railroads. He leaves his wife, Joan Robertson, and a son, Robertson Balfour. Funeral services will be held at the Saybrook Congregational Church Wednesday with burial in the local cemetery.

Daniels was on the Board of Public Utility Commissioners, New Jersey, while Wilson was governor of that state, and for a number of years was chairman of the ICC, during Wilson’s term as president. He was also a trustee of the New Haven Railroad from 1935 to 1937.

Served as ‘New Haven’ Trustee.

After taking degrees at Princeton and studying a year at the University of Leipzig, Daniels succeeded Wilson at Wesleyan, and later become professor of political economy at Princeton when Wilson left to become governor of New Jersey.

After three years as a member of the New Jersey Board of Public Utility Commissioners, Daniels accepted President Wilson’s call to become a member of the ICC, a post he held until 1923 when he resigned to come to Yale. He was chairman of the ICC from 1918 to 1919.

During the early stages of the “New Haven” Railroad reorganization proceedings, he agreed to serve as a trustee, finally retiring in 1937 to settle down at the house he built here.

In addition to writing numerous books, he also revised a continuation of Alexander Johnson’s History of the United States, and did a continuation of Johnson’s History of American Politics.

Source: Hartford Courant, January 4, 1944, p. 2.

______________________

Syllabus of lectures upon public finance
by Professor Winthrop More Daniels
Princeton, N.J.  1895-96

 

PUBLIC FINANCE.

LECTURE I. INTRODUCTION.
THE DEFINITION AND SCOPE OF PUBLIC FINANCE.

  1. Definition. Public Finance treats of the collection and expenditure of funds legally devoted to public ends, together with such effects, social, political and economic, which result from this exercise of governmental activity.
    1. Distinction between Public Finance and private finance.
    2. Importance of enforced collection.
    3. The French conception of Finance.
    4. The German conception of Finance.
    5. Derivation and meaning of the term—Finance.
  2. Practical Bearings of Finance.
    1. Allegation that Finance is exclusively an Art.
    2. Bearing of Finance on the individual citizen’s income. Luce’s statement: Leroy Beaulieu’s statement.
    3. Special Importance of Finance in the United States.
  3. Historical Bearings of Finance.
    1. Taxation as a dynamic historical agency: examples.
  4. Political Bearings of Finance.
    1. History and Politics in general; their relation.
    2. Finance, the battlefield of Politics.
    3. Finance, the source of constitutional changes.
  5. Economic Bearings of Finance.
    1. Effect of taxation upon social classes.
    2. Socialist proposals.
  6. Relation of Finance to Cognate Disciplines.
    1. Classification of the Sciences.
    2. Relation of Finance to Law, Politics, Economics.

 

LECTURE II.
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN FINANCE.

  1. The Modern Financial Constitution.
    1. The Modem Industrial (Factory) System: its characteristics.
    2. The Modern Financial System.
      1. Normal and calculable field of governmental activity.
      2. Periodic contributions in money.
      3. Popular control over governmental income and expenditure.
      4. Public Credit.
  2. The Economic and Financial Constitution of Athens.
    1. Economic Structure:—Slavery: Family-Industry: Sea Commerce.
    2. Financial Constitution: Revenue: The Liturgies.
  3. The Economic and Financial Constitution of Rome.
    1. Economic Structure:—Slavery: Absence of Manufactures,
    2. Financial Constitution: Revenue: its sources and nature.
  4. Summary, and Comparison of Classical and Modern Systems.
    1. Normal vs. abnormal governmental functions.
    2. Taxation in the modern sense, unknown.
    3. Absence of Public Credit.
  5. The Mediaeval Economic and Financial Structure.
    1. Economic Structure.
      1. Production synonymous with Agriculture.
      2. Serf labor.
      3. Embryonic state of Exchange: a “natural” economy.
    2. Financial Constitution.
      1. The Feudal view of Finance.
      2. The importance of personal services.
      3. Rise of Regalian Rights.

 

LECTURE III
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF FINANCE.

  1. Municipal Finance.
    1. The Rise of Cities: the Guild System.
    2. Increased cost of city government.
    3. Self-voted taxes arise; become permanent instead of occasional.
    4. Rise of Municipal Credit.
  2. The Development of Financial Constitutionalism in England.
    1. The Feudal System in England (1066).
    2. The Exchequer system.
    3. Origin of the representative theory. Scutage, 1156; Personal property taxes, 1181; Provisions of Magna Carta,
    4. Complete establishment of the representative financial constitution. The Civil War: The Revolution of 1688.
    5. The Extension of commercial constitutionalism. In the U. S.; in France; on the continent generally.

 

PART I.

LECTURE IV.
THE FIELD OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURE.

  1. Theories of the proper domain of State Expenditure.
    1. Their dependence on the prior theory the State’s nature.
    2. Spencer’s “Specialized Administration.”
      Expenditure warranted from this standpoint
    3. Adam Smith’s “Natural Liberty”.
      Expenditure warranted; Justice and Education.
    4. Mill’s modified laissez faire.
      Warranted expenditure, the “open door” for Socialism.
    5. Roscher’s Culturstaat
      Justifiable expenditure, a historic variable.
    6. Wagner’s State Socialism.
      Enlarged scope of expenditure.
    7. The Collectivist view.
      Public expenditure synonymous with Distribution.
  2. Practical Solution of the Question.
    1. Assumption of the Status quo.
    2. Criteria of proposed concrete extensions of expenditure.
      Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s three tests.
  3. The Categories of Expenditure.
    1. Historical development.
    2. The Expenditure of modern States.
      1. Defence; 2. Justice; 3. Trade and Industry; 4. Social well-being.
  4. The Growth of Expenditure.
    1. The universal increase.
    2. Causes—Nationality; Socialism.

 

LECTURE V.
EXPENDITURE IN THE UNITED STATES.

  1. Expenditure in the U. S. General Survey.
    1. Distribution of expenditure, federal, state, local.
    2. Comparison of expenditure in U. S. with expenditure elsewhere.
  2. Expenditure upon Administrative Bureaux.
    Distribution; Comparison; Tendency.
  3. Defence.
    Distribution, Comparison, Tendency,— increase of naval expenditure.
  4. Justice and Security.
    Distribution; Comparison; Tendency.
  5. Industry, Commerce, Public Works.
    Distribution; Comparison; Tendency.
  6. Education and Religion.
    Distribution; Comparison; Tendency,— industrial education, denominational schools.
  7. Charity and Correction.
    Distribution; Comparison; Tendency.
  8. Interest on Public Indebtedness.
    Distribution; Comparison; Tendency.

 

PART II.

LECTURE VI.
QUASI-ECONOMIC RECEIPTS.

  1. The Classification of Revenues.
    1. Quasi-economic revenues and tax revenues.
      The case of Fees.
    2. Varying proportion of the two kinds of revenue.
      Growing prominence of quasi-economic revenue.
    3. Relegation (1) of the domanial revenue in the U. S.; (2) of the proposed State monopoly of land.
  2. The Economic and Financial Aspect of Quasi-Economic Revenues.
    1. Priority of the economic question.
  3. Definition and Classification of Monopolies.
    1. Definition
    2. Classification: legal, natural, and industrial monopolies.
      Their occasional coalescence.
    3. Extent of monopolies.
  4. The Rise of Modern Monopolies.
    1. Early monopolies, mostly legal.
    2. Status of monopoly in 1800.
    3. Development of modern monopolies.
      1. Caused by city growth.
      2. Caused by industrial growth.
    4. Modification of the doctrine of laissez faire.
    5. Residual Competition.
  5. The Regulation of Natural (urban) Monopolies.
    1. Classes of urban monopolies.
    2. Water supply, its character.
    3. Light supply, its character.
    4. Local transportation, its character.
    5. Miscellaneous urban monopolies.

 

LECTURE VII.
THE GREAT INDUSTRIAL MONOPOLIES. RAILROADS.

  1. Origin and Development of Railroad Systems.
    1. The inception of the systems in various States.
    2. Tendency toward amalgamation.
      1. Linear consolidation.
      2. Parallel consolidation.
    3. Development of the Rate System.
      Tolls; charging “what the traffic will bear.”
    4. Development of Railroad legislation in U. S.
      1. Before 1870 and after.
      2. The Inter State Commerce Act; its provisions.
    5. Inference as to railroad legislation in the U. S.
  2. Possible Relations of the State to Railroads.
    1. State ownership and operation of all roads.
    2. State ownership and operation of some
    3. State operation (as by lease) without ownership.
    4. State ownership not involving State operation.
    5. Regulation (as by Commissions).
  3. State Ownership and Management.
    1. Feasibility viewed from standpoint of construction.
      1. 2. Economy.
        Adverse conclusions to State initiative.
    2. Transportation Rates.
      Prof Hadley’s evidence.
    3. Unjust Discrimination, local and personal.
      1. Natural origin of discrimination against certain localities.
      2. Discrimination against individuals.
    4. Cost of Operation.
      von Scheel’s argument. Leroy Beaulieu’s evidence.
    5. Necessity and advantage of pools.
    6. Alleged Analogy of State management of the Post Office.
      Differences in administration.
    7. Argument from Prussian Railroad management.
  4. The Compromise Systems.
    1. Part ownership and operation.
      Experience of Belgium.
    2. State operation by lease.
    3. State ownership, and corporate operation.
  5. State Regulation.
    1. Limitation of rates. Its inadequacy.
    2. Limitation of dividends. Its inadequacy and disadvantages.
    3. Special taxation, supervision and publicity.
  6. State Control of the Telegraph System.
    1. Monopoly characteristics.
    2. State ownership and operation; in England; on the continent
    3. The transitional period in telegraphic apparatus.
  7. Financial Conclusions.
    1. Governmental assumption of simple monopolies.
    2. Distinction between simple and complex monopolies.
    3. Revenue rule for State-owned monopolies.
    4. Revenue from other monopolies.

 

LECTURE VIII.
THE NATIONAL BANK SYSTEM OF THE U. S.

  1. Previous Banking Systems of the U. S.
    1. The First U. S. Bank: 1791-1811.
    2. The Second U. S. Bank: 1816-1836.
    3. The State Bank System.
    4. Outcome of the State Bank System in New York and Mass.
  2. Origin of the National Bank System.
    1. Financial conditions in 1863.
    2. Legislative Acts creating the National Banks.
  3. Method of Organization.
    1. The Office of Comptroller of the Currency.
    2. Bond deposit and. note issue.
  4. The Bank Note Circulation.
    1. Homogenous in form and security.
    2. Expansion and contraction provisions.
  5. Reserve and Security Funds.
    1. Redemption fund.
    2. Reserve fund held against deposit liabilities.
    3. Priority of obligations in case of failure.
  6. Miscellaneous Banking Regulations.
    1. Prohibited loans.
    2. Examinations and reports.
  7. Earnings — Sources and Limits.
    1. Sources.
    2. Regulations governing profits.
  8. Advantages and Defects of the System.
    1. Character of the currency furnished.
      1. Uniformity and security.
      2. Redemption
      3. Sensitiveness, in normal and abnormal conditions.
    2. Alleged unfair Discrimination.
      1. In favor of bond holders.
      2. Double interest.
  9. The Future Bank Currency of the U. S.
    1. Approaching termination of the present system.
    2. Possible Substitutes.
      1. State Bank Currency.
      2. Exclusive federal issues of paper currency.
      3. The Baltimore Plan for continuing the present system, with a different basis for the note circulation.

 

LECTURE IX.
THE BANK OF ENGLAND.

  1. The Founding of the Bank.
    1. Mixed motives of the Whigs in 1688.
    2. Previous banking; the goldsmiths.
    3. Low credit of the Government in 1694.
    4. Early political character of the Bank.
  2. Original Constitution of the Bank.
    1. Government.
    2. Prohibitions.
    3. Privileges.
  3. Present Constitution of the Bank (since 1844)
      1. Government.
      2. Capital.
      3. Separation of the Banking and Issue Departments.
      4. Suspension of the Act of 1844.
  1. The Position of the Bank in the Money Market.
    1. Sole depository of the reserve.
    2. Regulator of the reserve.
    3. Allayer of panics.

 

PART III.— TAX REVENUE.

LECTURE X.
TAXATION. ITS NATURE.

  1. Taxation.
    1. Definition of a tax.
    2. “Subject” and “Object” of Taxation.
      “Source” of taxation.
    3. Economic Nature of Taxation.
      1. Non-productive, a cost.
      2. Fallacies on the subject
    4. Divisions of the Theory of Taxation.
      1. Incidence, Problems of.
      2. Equity, Problems of.
      3. Administration, Problems

 

LECTURE XI
THE INCIDENCE OF TAXATION.

  1. Incidence.
    1. Definitions.
      Illustrations of the shifting of taxes.
  2. Early Theories of Incidence.
    1. The Physiocratic theory.
      Its inadequacy.
    2. The Diffusion theory.
      Statements of Lord Mansfield, Thiers, Canard, Mr. D. A. Wells.
  3. Incidence, as regards taxed products.
    1. Production under competitive conditions.
      Case I. — Inelastic Demand.
      Case II. — Elastic Demand. Collateral effects.
    2. Production under monopoly conditions.
    3. Actual conditions.
  4. Incidence as regards classes of Income.
    1. Analogy of IV to III sup. cit.
    2. Income by usance.
    3. Income by process of exchange.
      1. Incidence in case of Rent.
      2. Incidence in case of Interest.
      3. Incidence in case of Profits and Salaries.
      4. Incidence in case of Wages.
    4. Qualifications necessary for the application of IV.

 

LECTURE XII
DISTRIBUTION OF TAXATION.

  1. Definition of Distribution.
  2. The Fiscal Theory. McCulloch’s statement.
  3. The Politico-Social Theory.
  4. The Benefit Theory.
    1. Outline of the benefit theory.
    2. Sphere of its application.
    3. Measure of benefits received.
      1. Importance of service rendered.
      2. Cost of service rendered,
    4. Inadequacy of the Benefit-theory.
  5. The Ability Theory.
    1. Outline of the ability theory.
    2. The measure of ability: proportion or progression.
    3. Arguments for and against these tests.
      1. Degree of sacrifice involved.
      2. Socialistic tendency of progression.
      3. Unproductiveness of progression.
      4. Democratic nature of progression.
    4. Conclusions: General Superiority of the proportional system.
      1. In favor of the benefit-theory.
      2. In favor of the progressive rate for specific taxes.

 

LECTURE XIII.
THE TAX SYSTEM; ITS FORMS.

  1. Single vs. Multiple Taxation.
    1. Illustrations of the difference.
    2. Early proposal of a single tax.
      Vauban: the Physiocrats and l’împot unique.
    3. Difficulties of the single system.
      1. Disproportionality.
      2. Necessity of disguising taxation.
      3. Structure of central and local government.
    4. Difficulties of a Single Tax on monopoly gains.
      1. Disclosure difficult.
      2. Revenue inadequate and inelastic.

 

LECTURE XIV.
THE SINGLE TAX THEORY.

Introduction: History of “Progress and Poverty.”

  1. George’s Argument against private property in Land.
    1. The Moral Argument.
      The rightful basis of all property, — the labor basis.
      Criticism of this view. Case cited by Mr. George.
  2. The Economic Argument.
    1. George’s theoretical catena; Criticism thereof.
    2. George’s historical argument.
      Criticism, economic and statistical.
      The increase of poverty, its implications.
  3. Proposed Methods of Land Nationalization.
    1. Classification of Methods.
    2. Criticism of Confiscatory Methods.
    3. Criticism of Compensatory Methods.
      1. Difficulty in discounting rises in value.
      2. Recompense of undeserved losses.
      3. Effect on improvements.
      4. Increase of governmental functions.

 

LECTURE XV.
CLASSIFICATION OF TAXES.

  1. Classification.
    1. Basis of Classification; legal, economic and miscellaneous.
    2. Direct and Indirect Taxes.
  2. Comparison of Direct and Indirect Taxes.
    1. Merits and Defects of Direct Taxes.
      Defects; — do not reach the masses; slow automatic growth.
      Merits;— theoretical fairness where universal; political advantages.
    2. Merits and Defects of Indirect Taxes.
      Merits; — Productivity and relative popularity.
      Defects;— Inequality, hampered production, costliness of collection, and variableness.
  3. Direct and Indirect Taxes in the U. S.
    1. Apportionment of revenue sources.
      Federal and State revenue.
    2. Causes of this Apportionment.
      1. Customs. 2. Internal Revenue. 3. Direct Taxes.

Note:
General Property [&] Corporation and Succession Taxes [->] Direct Taxes:  State Taxes.
Internal Revenue [&] Customs [->] Indirect Taxes:  Federal Taxes.
Income Taxes (direct) States and (formerly) Federal taxes.

 

LECTURE XVI.
THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX.

  1. Description of the Tax.
    1. Definition.
    2. Distinction between real and personal property.
  2. Operation of the General Property Tax.
    1. Preliminary valuation of property.
      Law of situs: appeals.
    2. Final valuation of property.
    3. Collection of taxes.
  3. Historical Origin of the General Property Tax.
    1. Colonial taxes.
    2. Wolcott’s Report in 1796. Summary.
    3. The Transition Period (1796-1861).
      Growth of wealth: increased amount evidenced by credits; increased import of personal services.
  4. The Defects of the General Property Tax.
    1. False assumption of ability.
    2. Failure to reach personal estate.
    3. Administrative defects.
    4. Regressivity.
  5. The Transformation of the General Property Tax.
    1. Preliminary conditions.
    2. Abolition of the State tax on realty.
    3. Abolition or reduction of Taxes on personal property by local governments.
    4. State taxes on corporations.
    5. Inheritance taxes.

 

LECTURE XVII.
THE INTERNAL REVENUE SYSTEM.

  1. Origin of the Federal System of Internal Revenue.
    1. Earliest Excises.
      The Whiskey Tax; its repeal.
      Excises during the war of 1812.
    2. From 1862.
  2. Taxes on Distilled Spirits.
    1. Previous Condition of Production and Consumption.
    2. Effects of the tax.
      The yield of various rates of taxation.
      Effect on production; on consumption.
      Frauds on the Revenue.
    3. Abatement and Reform of the Tax.
  3. The Tax on Tobacco.
    1. General Features.
    2. Specific Features; steadiness; tendency to increase.
  4. Canons of Excise Taxation.
    1. Taxation as a regulative moral agency.
    2. Productivity, how attained.
    3. Number and nature of articles taxed; raw materials.
    4. Distribution of the burden of excises.

 

LECTURE XVIII
CUSTOMS DUTIES IN THE UNITED STATES.

  1. Origin of Customs.
    1. Historical origin.
    2. “Objects” of customs taxation.
      Transport dues; Export duties; Import duties.
  2. Principles of Revenue and Protective Tariffs.
    1. Definition of protective and revenue Tariffs.
    2. Rates of duty.
    3. Kind and number of articles taxed.
    4. Offsets by excise and drawbacks.
    5. Bases of assessment.
      Ad valorem, specific and minimum duties.
    6. Indirect cost of a protective tariff.
  3. The History of the Customs Policy of the U. S.
    1. Pre-Constitutional Customs Duties.
    2. Early Patristic Legislation, 1789-1808.
    3. Effect of the curtailment of foreign commerce
    4. Rise and Growth of Protection.
      1. Stimulation of domestic manufactures, 1808-1815.
      2. Geographical strength of the policy.
      3. Culmination of the movement in 1828.
    5. The Revenue Period, 1833-1860 [1842-6].
    6. The War Period. 1860-1865.
    7. Post Bellum Legislation.
      1. Repeal of internal revenue taxes.
      2. Repeal of duties on revenue articles.
      3. Protection as a permanent policy, 1890.
        The McKinley Bill: Reciprocity.
      4. The Wilson Bill, 1894.
        The House Bill; the Senate Bill.
    8. Revenue Yield of the Principal Schedules.
      1. Valuation of (total) dutiable imports.
      2. Most important Schedules, their yield.
      3. Other schedules.

 

LECTURE XIX.
INCOME TAXES.

  1. Income Taxes; their history.
    1. Definition.
    2. History of the English Income Tax.
    3. History of the War Income Tax in U. S.
    4. History of the Income Tax of 1894.
  2. Provisions of the Law of 1894.
    1. The two per cent. tax on net income.
    2. Corporation incomes and other incomes.
    3. Exemptions.
    4. Administrative machinery.
  3. Advantages and Defects of Income Taxes in General.
    1. Equalization of Taxation.
      1. Its utility as a fiscal instrument.
    2. Defects.
      1. Failure to discriminate between different kinds of income.
      2. Failure to tax certain kinds of income.
  4. Criticism of the Law of 1894.
    1. Popular (political) criticism.
    2. Effect of the tax on the distribution of taxation.
      1. Incidence of taxation in England.
        Jevons’s estimate. Evidence of Mr. Lowe.
      2. Incidence of Taxation in the United States.
      3. Conclusions as to the probable effect of the law.
    3. Defects of the Law.
      1. High exemption limit.
      2. Minor defects.
  5. The Income Tax Decision.
    1. Explanation of the status of the case.
    2. Contentions of the appellant.
    3. Argument upon the contentions.
    4. Explanation of the Decision.
    5. Probable outcome of the Decision.

 

PART IV.
The Relation of Receipts and Expenditures.

LECTURE XX.
STATE HOARDING.

  1. Time Relation of Receipts and Expenditures.
    1. Normal Equilibrium.
    2. Casual Inequality.
  2. Surplus Financiering.
    1. Its Dangers under representative government.
  3. The War Chest Policy.
    1. History.
      In antiquity: Example of Prussia in modern times.
    2. Criticism of the Policy.
      1. Financial inefficiency.
      2. Effect on industry.
      3. Effect on self-government.

 

LECTURE XXI.
PUBLIC DEBTS.

  1. Historical Development of Public Credit.
    1. Definition of Public Credit.
    2. Its geographical extension.
    3. Nature of the security given.
    4. Time of the loans; rate of interest.
  2. Characteristics of Modern Public Debts.
    1. Preconditions of public Indebtedness.
    2. Extent of public Indebtedness.
    3. Causes of the growth of public debts.
      1. Nationality. 2. Socialism.
  3. The Effect of Public Debts.
    1. Primâ facie economic effects.
    2. Political Effects.
      In municipal politics.
    3. Social and industrial Effects.
    4. Summary of Evils of public Indebtedness.
  4. Public Debts, when justifiable.
    1. General Principles.
      1. Fiscal Deficit. 2. War. 3. Public Works.

 

LECTURE XXII.
FEDERAL INDEBTEDNESS.

  1. Colonial Period, 1607-1775.
    1. Variety in tax systems.
    2. Various media of exchange.
    3. Forced loans by issues of paper currency.
  2. The Revolutionary Period, 1775-1789.
    1. Determinants of the financial policy of the war,
    2. Excessive issue of paper currency.
      Influence of this period upon the Constitution.
  3. The Formative Period, 1789-1861.
    1. Federal Assumption of the Revolutionary Debt.
      Hamilton’s Report; its final adoption.
    2. Funding the Debt.
      The Sinking Fund Policy, its error.
    3. Payment of the Debt under Gallatin,
    4. Financial Policy of the War of 1812.
  4. The Modern Period, 1861-1896.
    1. Financial Policy of the Civil War.
    2. Rapid Growth of the Debt of the United States.
    3. Analysis of the Debt in 1865.
    4. Process of reduction.

 

LECTURE XXIII.
LOCAL INDEBTEDNESS IN THE U. S.

  1. Decline of the financial activity of the States.
    1. Statistical proof of the decline.
    2. Early financial prominence of the States.
    3. Failure of the States’ financial undertakings.
    4. Registry of the failure.
  2. Local Indebtedness; its Causes.
    1. Subsidizing industrial enterprises.
    2. Increase in the expenses of city government.
    3. Municipal misgovernment.
      1. Defective municipal government.
      2. Legislative interference.
      3. Political complications with State and Federal politics.
      4. Underpayment of officials.
  3. Regulation of Local Debts.
    1. Restrictions of floating debts.
    2. Time limit of debts.
    3. Sinking Funds and Repayment.

 

LECTURE XXIV.
BUDGETARY LEGISLATION.

  1. The Budget.
    1. Definition
    2. Historical Origin.
      In England: in France: in the U. S.
  2. The English Budget.
    1. The Estimates, their preparation.
    2. The Parliamentary Presentation.
    3. Execution and Verification.
    4. Merits and Defects.
  3. The French Budget.
    1. Preparation
    2. Legislative Presentation.
    3. Execution and Verification.
    4. Defects of the French System.
  4. The Federal Budget in the U. S.
    1. The Estimates.
    2. The Congressional Presentation.
      In the House of Representatives: in the Senate: Final Outcome.
    3. Execution and Verification.
    4. Defects of the System.

 

Collateral Reading.

Required:

Dunbar [Charles F.]; Theory and History of Banking.  [Chapters on the Theory and History of Banking, 1891]

Taussig [Frank William]; The Silver Situation in the United States [1893].

Recommended:

Adams [Henry Carter]; Public Debts [—An Essay in the Science of Finance (1890)].

Bastable [Charles Francis]; Public Finance [1892].

 

Authorities.

Alexander [E. Porter]: Railway Practice [1887].
Bagehot [Walter]: Lombard Street [1873].
Bastable: [Charles Francis]: Commerce of Nations. [1893].
Bryce [James]: American Commonwealth. [3rd ed., 1893] Volume I: The National Government—The State Governments

[2nd ed., 1889] Volume II: The Party System—Public Opinion—Illustrations and Reflections—Social institutions

Buxton [Sydney]: Finance and Politics. [1888] Volume I; Volume II
Cohn [Gustav]: Nationaloekonomie. [Grundlegung der Nationalökonomie. Ein Lesebuch für Studirende, 1885]
Cooley [Thomas M.]: Taxation. [A Treatise on the Law of Taxation, including the Law of Local Assessments, 2nd ed., 1886]
Dowell [Stephen]: History of Taxation and Taxes. [A History of Taxation and Taxes in England, 2nd edition, 1888.  Volume 1: Taxation, From the Earliest Times to the Civil War; Volume 2: Taxation, From the Civil War to the Present Day; Volume 3: Direct Taxes and Stamp Duties; Volume 4: Taxes on Articles of Consumption.]
Ely [Richard Theodore]: Taxation in American States and Cities [1888].
Enc. Brit.: Art. On Finance by [J. E.]Thorold Rogers.
Eng. Cit. Series: Farrer [Thomas Henry]: The State in its Relation to Trade [1883].
Walpole [Spencer]: The Electorate and the Legislature [1881].
Wilson, [Alexander Johnstone]: The National Budget [—The National Debt, Taxes and Rates (1882)].
George [Henry]: Progress and Poverty [4th edition, 1881].
Von Halle [Ernst]: Trusts or Industrial Combinations [in the United States (1895)].
Leroy Beaulieu [Paul]: [Traité de la] Science des Finances [5th ed. Tome Premier: Des Revenus Publics (1892); Tome Second: Le Budget et le Crédit Public (1891).
Macaulay [Thomas Babington]: History of England from the Accession of James the Second. [Volume I (1877); Volume II (1877)]
Mill [John Stuart]: Political Economy [5th edition. Volume I (1893); Volume II (1893)]; On Liberty [People’s Edition, 1880].
Rae [John]: Contemporary Socialism [2nd ed. (1891)].
Roscher [Wilhelm]: Finanzwissenschaft. [System der Finanzwissenschaft. Ein Hand- und Lesebuch für Geschäftsmänner und Studierende. 3rd edition (1889)]
Schönberg [Gustav von]: Handbuch der politischen Oekonomie. [Third edition.

Volume 1, Volkswirtschaftslehre (1890);

Volume 2, Volkswirtschaftslehre (1891);

Volume 3, Finanzwissenschaft und Verwaltungslehre (1891)]

Seligman [Edwin Robert A.]: Shifting and Incidence of Taxation [1892]: Progressive Taxation [1894]: Taxation of Corporations [Part I (1890); Part II (1890); Part III (1890)].
Shearman [Thomas Gaskell]: Natural Taxation [—An Inquiry into the Practicability, Justice and Effects of a Scientific and Natural Method of Taxation (1895)].
Sumner [William Graham]: The Financier and the Finances of the American Revolution. [Volume I, (1891); Volume II, (1891)]
Supreme Court Reports.
Taussig: The Tariff History of the United States [1888]
Wilson [Woodrow]: Congressional Government [—A Study in American Politics (1885)].
Wells [David Ames]: Recent Economic Changes [and their Effect on the Production and Distribution of Wealth and the Well-Being of Society (1889)].
Practical Economics [—A Collection of Essays Respecting Certain of the Recent Economic Experiences of the United States (1888)].

 

Source: Columbia University Libraries. 308/Z/Box 475. Prof. [Winthrop More] Daniels. Syllabus of Lectures upon Public Finance, 1895-6. Princeton, N.J.: C. S. Robinson & Co., University Printers. “Gift of Prof. E. R. A. Seligman 12.23.39[?]”.

Image Source: Portrait of Winthrop More Daniels in Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, ed., Universities and their Sons: History, Influence and Characteristics of American Universities, with biographical sketches and Portraits of Alumni and Recipients of Honorary Degrees, Vol. 2 (Boston, 1899) p. 71.

 

Categories
Economics Programs Princeton

Princeton. Economics course offerings 1910-11

 

Not only were the Princeton University graduate economic course offerings in 1910/11 relatively slim, it is also interesting to note that five of the ten courses listed covered history of economics and economic history. Undergraduate courses could also be taken by graduate students in the department of history, politics, and economics. Links to the textbooks used are included in the following transcription of the economics portion of the course announcements.

___________________

UNDERGRADUATE COURSES

The following are the undergraduate [economics] courses in the Department of History, Politics, and Economics, and, though not listed or counted as graduate courses, they are open to graduate students of the Department:

45, 46. Elements of Economics. This course will comprise the essential elements of the abstract theory of economics and some of the more essential applications and exemplifications of the theory, such as money, banking, transportation, international trade, and monopoly problems. There will be one lecture a week, and two recitations in small groups to test the student’s apprehension of the subject matter covered in the reading. [Frank A.] Fetter: Principles of Economics; [Jeremiah Whipple] Jenks: The Trust Problem; and [Frank W.] Taussig: The Tariff History of the United States. Junior course, both terms, 3 hours a week. Prerequisite course: History 22 [Mediaeval History; 400 A.D.-1494 A.D. Sophomore elective, second term, 3 hours a week.]. Prerequisite to Public Finance and Money and Banking. Professor Daniels [Winthrop More Daniels, A.M.] and [Assistant] Professor Meeker [Royal Meeker, Ph.D.].

79. Economics. Public Finance. This course will cover the theory of public finance. Lectures with weekly conferences. [Winthrop More] Daniels: Public Finance; and [David MacGregor] Means: The Methods of Taxation. Senior course, first term, 3 hours a week. Prerequisite courses: History 22 and Economics 45, 46. Professor Daniels [Winthrop More Daniels, A.M.].

80. Economics. Money and Banking. This course is designed to outline briefly the problems touching money and banking. [Joseph French] Johnson: Money and Banking; [Edwin Walter] Kemmerer: Money and Prices [Money and Credit Instruments in their Relation to General Prices]; [Amos Kidder] Fiske: Modern Bank. Senior course, second term, 3 hours a week. Prerequisite courses: History 22 and Economics 45 and 46. [Assistant] Professor Meeker [Royal Meeker, Ph.D.].

THE PRO-SEMINARY. In the Department of History, Politics, and Economics there will be a pro-seminary both terms; the pro-seminary to be divided into sections, one for history, one for politics, and one for economics. Admission to the pro-Seminary will be conditioned upon a student’s obtaining in the Junior year courses in the Department the standing prescribed for entrance upon pro-seminary work….Professor Meeker will have charge of the economics section; and Industrial Organizations of Capital and of Labor will be the subjects of study, first and second term respectively.

 

GRADUATE COURSES

ECONOMICS

133. History of Economic Theory. Early economic theory through Adam Smith. A study of Mercantilist and Physiocratic thought, and the work of Adam Smith, preceded by a brief resumé of ancient and mediaeval economic ideas. Three hours a week, first term. Given 1909-10. Professor [sic] Adriance [Walter Maxwell Adriance, A.M., Preceptor in History, Politics and Economics].

134. History of Economic Theory. The classical economists through J. S. Mill and Cairnes. Beginning with Malthus, the concrete problems in which the classical English political economy arose are taken up for study. The theory of Distribution in particular is traced in the Ricardian economics and down through the Wage-Fund theory. Three hours a week, second term. Given 1909-10. Professor Daniels [Winthrop More Daniels, A.M.].

135. History of Economic Theory. The modern movement in Economics, beginning with Jevons and the Austrian school, down through the modern critical analysis of the nature of capital, interest, and the process of Distribution. Three hours a week, first term. Given 1910-11. Professor Daniels [Winthrop More Daniels, A.M.].

136. Statistics. Modern methods of statistical investigation and their results; with problems in practical statistical work. Three hours a week, second term. Give 1910-11. Professor Adriance [Walter Maxwell Adriance, A.M., Preceptor in History, Politics and Economics].

137, 138. Economic History. This course is designed to give a general account of the economic development of the United States. Beginning with the explorations and settlements that led to the colonization of the continent, will be traced the growth of industry, agriculture, commerce, transportation, population, and labor, from the simple, isolated agricultural communities of the colonies to the complex industrial and commercial society of today. The principal topics discussed will be the land policy, the westward movement, internal improvements, the factory system, slavery, the tariff, immigration, the national finances, etc. A brief survey of the economic history of the industrially most developed European nations will also be given in so far as it is necessary to a complete understanding of the economic development of the United States. The lectures will be supplemented by assigned reading, and a thesis will be prepared by each student during the year on at least one subject. Three hours a week, both terms.

139. Modern Industrial Organization. Organization of Labor. A study of the development of labor organizations, the changes in the legal concepts of labor combinations, conspiracy, strikes, monopoly, boycott, etc., and the aims and methods of trades-unions today. Three hours a week, first term. Given 1909-10. Professor Meeker [Royal Meeker, Ph.D.].

140. Modern Industrial Organization. Organization of Capital. A study of modern industrial methods, the growth of large-scale industry, culminating in the recent Trust development and the effects of this movement industrial, political, and social. Three hours a week, second term. Given 1909-10. Professor Meeker [Royal Meeker, Ph.D.].

141, 142. History and Theory of Transportation. A survey of the improvements in methods and instruments of transportation and the consequent changes in the legal and economic theories relating thereto. A reading knowledge of French and German will be desirable. Three hours a week, both terms, alternating with Courses 139, 140. Given 1910-11. Professor Meeker [Royal Meeker, Ph.D.].

 

Source: Department of History, Politics and Economics. Announcements for 1910-11. Official Register of Princeton University, Vol. I, No. 8 (March 15, 1910).

Image Source:   Princeton University (ca. 1909 photo). Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C.