Categories
Economists FU-Berlin M.I.T. Popular Economics Syllabus

Paul Krugman, academic scribbles and glimpses of yore and not so yore.

 

Adam Tooze’s review of Paul Krugman’s Arguing with Zombies: Economics, Politics and the Fight for a Better Future (London Review of Books, Vol. 43, No. 8, 22 April 2021) has received much deserved social media acclaim.

Since you are here now looking at economics in my rear-view mirror, I thought it as good a time as any to assemble a few links from this blog and Freie Universität Berlin that go back a decade and more. Krugman’s adoring fans and fiercest critics are welcome.

__________________

Dr. h.c. FU-Berlin
(December 4, 1998)

Materials from the ceremony awarding Paul Krugman an honorary doctorate at Freie Universität Berlin are linked at this antique webpage archived by the Wayback Machine.

In case you missed the event…

Laudatio by Irwin Collier

Archived text: Original webpage (includes graphics) 

Audio recording

Paul Krugman’s award lecture: The Return of Demand Side Economics

Archived text: Original webpage

Audio recording

__________________

 “The Failure of Crisis Management”
(October 20, 2010)

Paul Krugman’s Ernst Fraenkel lecture for the John F. Kennedy Institute of North American Studies at Freie Universität Berlin.

Video recording

Image Source: https://www.fu-berlin.de/campusleben/campus/2010/101022_krugman/

__________________

Transcribed Artifacts from
Economics in the Rear-view Mirror:

M.I.T. Economics Department. Graduate Student Skit: “The Wizard of E52-383C” in which Paul Krugman played the role of Paul Samuelson and was co-author (1976).

M.I.T. Economics Department. Slides, Problems Sets, Exams for Principles of Macroeconomics taught by Paul Krugman (1998).

 

Categories
Chicago Economic History Suggested Reading Syllabus

Chicago. Reading list for Economic History of Modern Europe to 1800. Hamilton, 1966

 

Some graduate course reading lists are allowed to evolve into full-blown bibliographies that provide historians of economics little idea of what the actual content of the course itself happened to be. Earl J. Hamilton was an economic historian who kept his reading lists short and sweet. I wouldn’t have put it past him or any other professor to have covered other material in his lectures, but I am still willing to bet that he really expected his students to complete this reading list.

________________________

[U.C.]
Economics 346
Economic History of Modern Europe to 1800
Earl J. Hamilton
Spring Quarter, 1966

To be read before May 6, 1966

  1. Sir John Clapham, A Concise Economic History of Britain…to 1750 (Cambridge, 1949), pp. 185-305.
  2. *J. H. Parry, The Age of Reconnaissance, pp. 19-52.
  3. *Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations, Book IV, Chapter VIII.
  4. N. Clark, Science and Social Welfare in the Age of Newton (Oxford, 1937), pp. 1-59.
  5. Earl J. Hamilton, “The Decline of Spain,” Economic History Review, Vol. VIII (1938), pp. 168-179.
  6. John U. Nef, Industry and Government in France and England, 1540-1640 (1940), pp. 1-157.
  7. Edwin F. Gay, “Inclosures in England in the Sixteenth Century,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. XVII, (1902—1903), pp. 576-597.
  8. *Earl J. Hamilton, “The Role of Monopoly in the Overseas Expansion and Colonial Trade of Europe before 1800,” American Economic Review, Proceedings, Vol. XXXVIII (1948), pp. 33-53.
  9. *Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London, 1930), Chapters I-V.
  10. Eli F. Heckscher, Mercantilism (London, 1935), Vol. I, pp. 19-44; Vol. II pp. 13-30.
  11. *W. Cunningham, The Growth of English Industry and Commerce, Third Edition, Vol. II (1903), Modern Times, pp. 494-540 (Ch. XV. Changes in the Organisation and Distribution of Industry); 540-583 (Ch. XVI. Spirited Proprietors and Substantial Tenants); 609-620 (Bk. VII, Ch. I. The Workshop of the World).
  12. L. Jones, “Agriculture and Economic Growth in England, 1660-1750,” Journal of Economic History, Vol. XXXV, No. 1 (March, 1965), pp. 1-18.
  13. H. John, “Agricultural Productivity and Economic Growth in England, 1700-1760, Journal of Economic History, Vol. XXXV, No. 1 (March, 1965), pp. 19-34.

*Read only for clearly essential facts, interpretation and point of view.

There will be an examination on May 6th.

A term paper on some important factor in the general economic development of some important country or period, some aspect of the rise of modern capitalism, some problem concerning mercantilism and economic development, or the growth of agriculture, industry, corporate organization or commerce in some significant time and place will be due on May 13th.

There will be a final examination from 8:30 to 11:30 A.M., on June 3rd on the lectures, the assigned reading and the field in which each student’s term paper falls.

 

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Earl J. Hamilton Papers, Box 2, Folder “Correspondence. Academic and Personal”.

Image Source:  University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf1-02446, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.

 

Categories
Chicago Suggested Reading Syllabus

Chicago. Reading list for Money. Meiselman, 1961

 

David Israel Meiselman (1924-2014)  was awarded a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Chicago in 1961. His thesis “The Term Structure of Interest Rates” won the Ford Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Series Award. 

Interview of David Meiselman conducted by Robert L. Hetzel (March 28, 1995)” can be downloaded from the Robert Hetzel Oral History Collection at the FRASER website.

Following the Virginian House Resolution in his honor, the reading list for the graduate money course taught by assistant professor David Meiselman from the Autumn quarter of 1961 can be found. Milton Friedman’s reading list for the same course in 1963 has been posted earlier.

______________________

STATE OF VIRGINIA
HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 294
Offered February 24, 2015
Celebrating the life of David I. Meiselman.
2015 SESSION

––––––––––
Patron––Rust
––––––––––

WHEREAS, David I. Meiselman of Fairfax County, a distinguished economist and retired professor in the graduate economics program at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, a highly regarded teacher and researcher, a veteran of the United States military, and a devoted husband and father, died on December 3, 2014; and
WHEREAS, after serving in the United States Army during World War II, David Meiselman received a bachelor’s degree from Boston University and master’s and doctoral degrees from the University of Chicago; and
WHEREAS, David Meiselman’s doctoral thesis, “The Term Structure of Interest Rates,” won a prize from the Ford Foundation and was instrumental in the creation of futures markets and other financial concepts that today are in wide use; and
WHEREAS, David Meiselman conducted pioneering research in many different economic disciplines and on public policy issues; he taught at the University of Chicago, the Johns Hopkins University, Macalester College, and the University of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, David Meiselman was the author of five books and more than 100 articles; he had wide-ranging interests in economic policies and issues, and his work has been cited in many academic and research publications; and
WHEREAS, in 1971, David Meiselman moved to Merrybrook in Fairfax County; he helped build Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University’s graduate level economics program in Northern Virginia; in all, he taught in the Commonwealth for more than 25 years; and
WHEREAS, during an outstanding career, David Meiselman was a senior economist for the United States Treasury, the United States House of Representatives, and the Organization of American States and served as a visiting scholar and later senior economist in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; and
WHEREAS, David Meiselman worked at several research and educational institutions, including the Manhattan Institute, where he was a founder and member of the board of directors, the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, and the American Enterprise Institute; and
WHEREAS, in great demand for his expertise and insight, David Meiselman was a consultant to the United States Secretary of the Treasury, the World Bank, the New York Stock Exchange, and other government agencies and private companies; and
WHEREAS, in retirement, David Meiselman and his wife, Winifred, spent much time working to preserve their antebellum home, Merrybrook, near Herndon, which is a historic Civil War site and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places; and
WHEREAS, in addition to his wife, Winifred, David Meiselman will be greatly missed and fondly remembered by his children, Shmuel “Sam,” Ellen, and Nina, and their families, and by many other family members and friends; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the House of Delegates hereby note with great sadness the loss of David I. Meiselman of Fairfax County, a distinguished economist and retired professor in the graduate economics program at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, a highly regarded teacher and researcher, a veteran of the United States military, and a devoted husband and father; and, be it
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Clerk of the House of Delegates prepare a copy of this resolution for presentation to the family of David I. Meiselman as an expression of the House of Delegates’ respect for his memory.

Source: https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?151+ful+HR294+pdf 

______________________

ECONOMICS 331 — MONEY
Autumn, 1961
D. Meiselman

(Note: selections are in the suggested order for reading. Readings marked with an asterisk (*) are required.)

I. The Supply of Money

The Federal Reserve System: Purposes and Functions

Robert V. Roosa, Federal Reserve Operations in the Money and Government Securities Markets

A.J. Meigs, Free Reserves and Interest Rates in a Theory of Money Supply Determination, chapters 1, 3, 4, pp. 77-82.

*G. Horwich, “Elements of Timing and Response in the Balance Sheet of Banking,” Journal of Finance (May, 1957).

P. Cagan, “The Demand for Currency Relative to the Total Money Supply,” Journal of Political Economy (August, 1958).

Albert G. Hart, “The Chicago Plan of Banking Reform,” in Readings in Monetary Theory.

*Milton Friedman, A Program for Monetary Stability, chapter 2.

Edward Simmons, “The Relative Liquidity of Money and Other Things,” in Readings in Monetary Theory.

Roland N. NcKean, “Liquidity and a National Balance Sheet,” in Readings in Monetary Theory.

II. Classical Quantity Theory and the Rate of Interest

*Irving Fisher, The Purchasing Power of Money, chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 8.

*Alfred Marshall, Official Papers, “Evidence Before the Indian Currency Committee (1849)” questions 11758-11762; and “Evidence Before the Gold and Silver Commission (1887-88),” questions 9629-86. Testimony to Royal Commission on The Depression of Trade and Industry (1886), answers to question 8(i).

*A.C. Pigou, “The Value of Money,” in Readings in Monetary Theory.

Knut Wicksell, Interest and Prices, chapter 4.

___________, “The Influence of the Rate of Interest on Prices,” Economic Journal, V (17) June, 1907.

*J.M. Keynes, Tract on Monetary Reform, pp. 74-87, 41-73.

*Irving Fisher, The Theory of Interest, chapters 1-3.

*F.H. Knight, “Interest” in Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences; also in Ethics of Competition.

Irving Fisher. Appreciation and Interest.

J.M. Keynes, Treatise on Money, Vol. 2, pp. 198-208.

*J.R. Hicks, “A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money,” in Readings in Monetary Theory, and Economica (1935).

III. The Keynesian Revolution

A. The Demand for Money, and the Rate of Interest

*J.M. Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, chapters 11-17.

James Tobin, “The Interest-Elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash,” Review of Economics and Statistics (August, 1956).

__________, “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk,” Review of Economic Studies (August, 1956), pp. 241-47.

*W.J. Baumol, “The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach,” Quarterly Journal of Economics (November, 1952).

*Joan Robinson, “The Rate of Interest” Econometrica, Vol. 19; reprinted as chapter I of The Rate of Interest and Other Essays.

Abba Lerner, “On the Marginal Product of Capital and the Marginal Efficiency of Investment,” Journal of Political Economy (February, 1953), pp. 1-14.

B. The Theory of Income and Employment

*J.M. Keynes, The General Theory, chapters 1-4; chapter 6, section 2; chapters 7-10, 18-21, 24.

*Paul A. Samuelson, “The Simple Mathematics of Income Determination,” chapter 6 in Lloyd Metzler, et al, Income, Employment and Public Policy.

IV. The Wake of the Revolution

*J.R. Hicks, “Mr. Keynes and the Classics,” Econometrica (April, 1937). Reprinted in Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution.

*F. Modigliani, “Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money,” Econometrica (January, 1944) and reprinted in Readings in Business Cycle Theory.

Jacob Marschak, Income, Employment and the Price Level, Lectures 1, 3, 12-20.

*D.H. Robertson, “Mr. Keynes and the Rate of Interest,” in Essays in Monetary Theory, and Readings in Theory of Income Distribution.

J.R. Hicks, Value and Capital, pp. 115-27, 130-62.

*H.G. Johnson, “Notes on Some Cambridge Controversies in Monetary Theory,” and D.H. Robertson, “Comments on Mr. Johnson’s Notes,” Review of Economic Studies (1951-52), pp. 90-110.

*Harold Somers, “Monetary Policy and the Theory of Interest,” in Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution.

*Don Patinkin, “Price Flexibility and Full Employment,” in Readings in Monetary Theory.

O.H. Brownlee, “The Theory of Employment and Stabilization Policy,” Journal of Political Economy (October, 1950).

Lloyd Metzler, “Wealth, Saving, and the Rate of Interest,” Journal of Political Economy (April, 1951).

*H.G. Johnson, “The General Theory After 25 Years,” copies on reserve. Also, American Economic Review (May, 1961).

*Milton Friedman, “Price, Income and Monetary Changes in Three Wartime Periods,” and Whittlesey’s discussion, pp. 614-25 and 642-43, American Economic Review Supplement 42 (May, 1952).

*Milton Friedman and David Meiselman, “The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and the Investment Multiplier in the U.S., 1897-1958,” sections 1, 2, 3, 5. Copies on reserve.

V. The Demand for Money and General Equilibrium Theory

*Don Patinkin, Money, Interest and Prices, Introduction and chapters 1-4, 8, and quotations on pp. 420, 435.

____________, “Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds: Stock and Flow Analysis,” Economica, 1958.

*G.C. Archibald and R.G. Lipsey, “Monetary and Value Theory: A Critique of Lange and Patinkin,” Review of Economic Studies 26 (1), pp 1-22.

*Milton Friedman, “The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement,” in Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, ed., M. Friedman.

*H. Makower and J. Marschak, “Assets, Prices, and Monetary Theory,” Readings in Price Theory and Economica (1938), pp. 261-88.

*M. Friedman, “The Demand for Money: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results,” Journal of Political Economy (August, 1959), pp. 327-51.

Philip Cagan, “The Monetary Dynamics of Hyperinflation,” esp. pp. 25-35 and 86-91 in Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, ed., M. Friedman.

H.A. Latane, “Cash Balances and the Interest Rate—A Pragmatic Approach,” Review of Economics and Statistics (November, 1954), and supplementary article in Review of Economics and Statistics (November, 1960).

D. Meiselman, “Expectations, Errors, and the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” copies on reserve.

G.L.S. Shackle, “Recent Theories Concerning the Nature and Role of Interest,” Economic Journal (June, 1961).

John G. Gurley and Edward S. Shaw, Money in a Theory of Finance, chapters 1, 2, and summaries at the ends of succeeding chapters.

Don Patinkin, “Financial Intermediaries and Monetary Theory,” American Economic Review (March, 1961).

Alvin Marty, “Gurley and Shaw on Money in a Theory of Finance,” Journal of Political Economy(February, 1961).

*M. Friedman and D. Meiselman, op. cit., pp. 58-68.

VI. The Monetary Standard and International Monetary Adjustments

*Lloyd Mints, Monetary Policy for a Competitive Society, chapters 4,5.

*H.G. Johnson, International Trade and Economic Growth, chapters 6,7.

*J.M. Keynes, Tract on Monetary Reform, pp. 87-138.

___________, “Economic Consequences of Mr. Churchill,” in Essays in Persuasion.

*Milton Friedman, “The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates,” in Essays in Positive Economics.

Alan Holmes, The New York Foreign Exchange Market, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Milton Friedman Papers, Box 77, Folder “2. University of Chicago, Econ. 331”.

Image Source: David Meiselman 1979 portrait from Wikimedia Commons.

Categories
Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Reading list for Mathematical Approaches to Economic Theory. Houthakker, 1960-1961

 

Hendrik Houthakker joined the Harvard economics faculty in 1960. One of the courses he taught in his first academic year at Harvard was “Mathematical Approaches to Economic Theory”. Following the Faculty Memorial Minute, this post provides the course enrollment numbers along with the two-semester syllabus. Exams for the course were not found in the bound, printed collection of final examinations for 1960-61 at the Harvard University Archives.

______________________

Hendrik Samuel Houthakker
Faculty of Arts and Sciences — Memorial Minute

At a Meeting of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences March 10, 2009, the following Minute was placed upon the records.

Hendrik Samuel Houthakker, the late Henry Lee Professor of Economics, Emeritus, at Harvard University, lived a very rich and full life that brought him into contact with some of the great events of our time. He was born in Amsterdam in 1924 and lived through the Nazi occupation of The Netherlands. He received his doctorandus degree in economics at the University of Amsterdam in 1949 and immediately joined the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Cambridge.

In 1950 Houthakker published a paper that assured him a permanent place in the history of economic thought, presenting his famous Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference. The force of this stunning contribution is well captured by Robert Pollak in the following words: “Economics, unlike mathematics, has relatively few classic well-posed problems whose solutions can make professional reputations. The original revealed preference problem was one of them.” Houthakker’s paper was cited in 1963 when he received the John Bates Clark Medal of the American Economic Association, awarded every other year to that economist under 40 who has made the most significant contribution to economics. The paper was one of two major themes in Pollak’s essay, “Houthakker’s Contributions to Economics,” written on the occasion of his election as Distinguished Fellow of the Association in 1988.

From Cambridge Houthakker went to the Cowles Commission on Economics at the University of Chicago. His contributions to economics continued at a breathtaking pace and included the first of his important empirical studies of consumer demand, The Analysis of Family Budgets, with S. J. Prais. Houthakker’s empirical findings, like his theoretical work, have become an enduring part of economics. He moved to Stanford in 1954, where he met his wife, Anna-Teresa, and then to Harvard in 1960.

It would be difficult to exaggerate Houthakker’s contributions to the Department of Economics at Harvard. He was a mentor to generations of junior faculty. He taught a wide variety of courses, beginning with econometrics and mathematical economics and later including international economics and financial economics. He served for twenty-one years as the sole editor of the Review of Economics and Statistics, then as now one of Harvard’s two leading journals of economics. Houthakker read many of the manuscripts himself, assigned the best to referees, and made the final editorial decisions. When he stepped down he was replaced by a committee. He was also acting chairman of the Department of Economics in 1987–88.

A short description of Houthakker, written on the occasion of his passing by his friend and former colleague Andreu Mas-Colell, now professor of economics at the University Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, captures him well:

“I was privileged to be his colleague at Harvard, where he received me with much kindness and I discovered a gentle man with very broad intellectual and social interests. My own proclivities led to many exchanges on revealed preference and aggregation theory. I distinctly recall them as most enlightening.”

Houthakker was appointed to be a Member of the Council of Economic Advisers from 1969 to 1971 by President Richard Nixon. This period included the collapse of Bretton Woods, the system of fixed parities for international currencies established after World War II. Writing about the secrecy with which the policies to resolve the financial crisis were formulated and implemented, Houthakker penned the following words, which now seem prescient:

“In any democracy it is difficult to carry out policies without public awareness, public criticism, and public cooperation wherever possible. Under the U.S. Constitution, congressional involvement is even more essential, no matter how time-consuming and politically hazardous.”

One of Houthakker’s interests, known to only a few of his colleagues and friends, was the social and ethical aspects of economics. In 1992 he organized a symposium on the centennial of the papal encyclical, Rerum Novarum, translated by the Vatican as “Capital and Labor.” This was written by Pope Leo XIII in 1891 and presented the papal view of capitalism, socialism, and the role of the state. In 1991 Pope John Paul II wrote the encyclical, Centesimus Annus (“In the Hundredth Year”). This brought the papal view up to date through the fall of communism in Eastern Europe and the ongoing collapse of the Soviet Union. Chapter 5 presented an emphatic and elaborate statement of approval for the transition to democracy and a market economy then under way.

Pope John Paul II had been a close friend of Anna-Teresa and Hendrik Houthakker since the 1970s, a story recounted in the biography His Holiness by Carl Bernstein of Bernstein and Woodward, and Marco Politi, the Italian journalist. The authors quote Houthakker on his conversations with John Paul II, then the Cardinal Archbishop Karol Wojtyla, “I tried to talk with him about the merits of capitalism and democracy, but I had a feeling I wasn’t getting anywhere.” The conversations between Houthakker and the Cardinal, later the Pope, eventually bore fruit. The symposium was a success and led to a book, Social and Ethical Aspects of Economics: A Colloquium in the Vatican, published in 1992.

The symposium was among the services to the church acknowledged in Houthakker’s election as Knight Commander with Star in the Papal Order of Saint Gregory in 2003. The papal knighthood was added to the long list of honors he received, including Presidency of the Econometric Society in 1967, Vice Presidency of the American Economic Association in 1972, membership in the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, corresponding membership in the Netherlands Academy of Sciences and honorary degrees from his alma mater, the University of Amsterdam, and the University of Fribourg. He was devoted to economic research from his youth in Amsterdam until the very end of his life, and he received the honors that his originality, depth, and breadth of interests merited. He is survived by his wife of 52 years, Anna-Teresa, and his children Louis, Jan Nicholas, and Isabella Romana.

Respectfully submitted,

Guido Imbens
Andreu Mas-Colell
James Stock
Dale Jorgenson, Chair

Source (including portrait): Harvard Gazette website. April 30, 2009.

______________________

Course Enrollment

[Economics 214] Mathematical Approach to Economic Theory. Professor Houthakker. Full Course.

(F) Total 13: 9 Graduates, 1 Junior, 2 Radcliffe, 1 Other.
(S) Total 10: 7 Graduates, 1 Junior, 2 Radcliffe.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College, 1960-1961, p. 78.

______________________

Note for the Fall reading list, an asterisk (*) denotes a “supplementary or alternative reading”; for the Spring semester reading list it designates a “recommended reading” (presumably as opposed to a “required reading”). So it  appeasr the “non-asterisked” items constituted the required readings for the course.

______________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics
Economics 214, First Semester

Reading List
Fall 1960
Professor Houthakker

The first semester of the course will be devoted mostly to static microeconomics. The classical approach is discussed first to be followed by lectures on linear and nonlinear programming. The mathematical knowledge assumed is equivalent to one year of calculus and some versatility in high school algebra. Titles marked * are supplementary or alternative readings.

1. Mathematical background: Matrix algebra and constrained maxima and minima of several variables.

* Henderson & Quandt, Microeconomic Theory, Appendix.

* Dorfman, Samuelson and Solow, Linear Programming and Economic Analysis, Appendix B.

* Perlis, Theory of Matrices.

* Aitken, Determinants and Matrices.

* Thrall and Tornheim, Matrices and Vector Spaces.

*Allen, Mathematical Economics, Chs. 12-14.

*Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Appendix A.

* Debreu and Herstein, “Non-negative square matrices,“ Econometrica, 1953.

* Ferrar, Algebra.

2. Classical theory of the consumer

Henderson & Quandt, Microeconomic Theory, Ch. 2.

Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Chs. 5-7.

Hicks, Value and Capital, Chs. 1-3 and Math. Appendix, Sections 3-12.

*Hicks, A Revision of Demand Theory.

Bushaw & Clower, Introduction to Math. Economics, Ch. 5.

Allen and Bowley, Family Expenditure, Ch. 3 and Math. Appendix.

*Allen, Mathematical Analysis for Economists, Ch. 19.

*Allen, Mathematical Economics, Ch. 19.

*Wold, Demand Analysis, Part II.

Samuelson, “The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory,” Economica, 1950.

*Tobin and Houthakker, “The Effects of Rationing on Demand Elasticities,” Review of Economic Studies, 1950-1.

*Houthakker, “Compensated Changes in Quantities and Qualities Consumed,” Review of Economic Studies, 1951-52.

*Ichimura, “A Critical Note on the Definition of Related Goods,” (with comment by Hicks), Review of Economic Studies, 1950-51.

*Friedman, “Professor Pigou’s Method for Measuring Elasticities of Demand from Budgetary Data,” QJE, 1935-36.

Houthakker, “Additive Preferences,” Econometrica, April 1960.

*Frisch, “A Complete Scheme for Computing All Direct and Cross Demand Elasticities in a Model with Many Sectors,” Econometrica, April 1959.

3. Classical Theory of the firm

Henderson & Quandt, Microeconomic Theory, Ch. 3.

Samuelson, Foundations, Ch. 4.

Hicks, Value and Capital, Chs. 6-7 and Math. Appendix.

Allen, Mathematical Analysis for Economists, Ch. 19.

*Allen, Mathematical Economics, Ch. 18.

*Bushaw & Clower, Introduction to Math. Economics, Ch. 6.

4. Linear Programming and Input-Output Analysis

Dorfman, Samuelson, and Solow, Linear Programming and Economic Analysis, Ch. 1-7, 9-10.

*Koopmans, Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Ch. III.

Leontief, The Structure of American Economy, Part II.

Chenery & Clark, Interindustry Economics, Ch. 1-4, *11, *12.

*Manne, Scheduling of Petroleum Refinery Operations.

*Allen, Mathematical Economics, Chs. 16-17.

*Lefeber, Allocation in Space.

*Houthakker, “On the Numerical Solution of the Transportation Problem,” Journal of Operations Research Society of America, May 1955.

*Henderson, The Efficiency of the Coal Industry.

*Farrell, “An Application of Activity Analysis to the Theory of the Firm,” Econometrica, 1954.

Houthakker, “The Pareto Distribution and the Cobb-Douglas Production Function in Activity Analysis,” Review of Economic Studies, 1955-56.

Klein, “On the Interpretation of Professor Leontief’s System,” Review of Economic Studies, 1952-53 (also discussion by Morishima and Klein in 1956-7 volume).

*Koopmans, Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, Ch. 1.

5. Nonlinear programming

Dorfman, Samuelson, and Solow, Linear Programming and Economic Analysis, Ch. 8.

*Kuhn and Tucker, “Nonlinear Programming,” Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Math. Stat. and Prob.

Houthakker, “The Capacity Method of Quadratic Programming,” Econometrica, Jan. 1960.

*Markowitz, Portfolio Selection. Ch. [no number given]

*Wolfe, “The Simplex Method for Quadratic Programming,” Econometrica, July 1959.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics
Economics 214, Math. Approach to Economic Theory

Reading List
Spring 1961
Professor Houthakker

Items marked * are recommended

General Equilibrium

Arrow & Debreu, “Existence of Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy,” Econometrica, July, 1954.

Wald, “On some systems of equations of mathematical economics” (transl.), Econometrica, Oct. 1951.

Von Neumann, “A model of general economic equilibrium (transl.), Review of Economic Studies, No. 33, 1945-46, (also note by Champernowne following this paper).

*Debreu, Theory of Value, Ch. 1-5.

Gale, Theory of Linear Economic Models, Ch. 6-9.

Dorfman, Samuelson, Solow, Linear Programming and Economic Analysis, Ch. 13.

*Malinvaud, “Programmes d’Expansion et Taux d’Intérêt,” Econometrica, April ’59.

Stability of Equilibrium

Arrow & Hurwicz, “On the Stability of the Competitive Equilibrium, Econometrica, October 1958 (see also Econometrica, July 1960).

*Arrow, Block & Hurwicz, “On the Stability of the Competitive Equilibrium,” Econometrica, Jan. 1959.

*McKenzie, “Stability of Equilibrium and the Value of Positive Excess Demand,” Econometrica, July 1960.

Henderson & Quandt, Microeconomic Theory, Ch. 4-5.

Bushaw & Clower, Introduction to Mathematical Economics, Ch. 3-4.

*Arrow & Nerlove, “A Note on Expectations and Stability,” Econometrica, April 1958.

Dynamic Micro-theory

Tintner, “Maximization of Utility over Time,” Econometrica, 1938.

Strotz, “Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization,” Review of Economic Studies, No. 62, 1955-56.

*Cramer, “A Dynamic Approach to the Theory of Consumer Demand,” Review of Economic Studies, No. 64, Feb. 1957.

Neisser, “The Pricing of Consumers’ Durables,” Econometrica, Oct. 1959.

Bushaw & Clower, Ch. 5, Section 7-8; Ch. 6 Section 8-9.

Growth Models; Dynamic Input-Output Analysis

Leontief, “Dynamic Analysis,” Studies in the Structure of the American Economy.

Hawkins & Simon, “Some Conditions of Macro-economic Stability,” Econometrica, July-Oct. 1949.

Dorfman, Samuelson & Solow, Ch. 11-12.

Solow, “Competitive Valuation in a Dynamic Input-Output System,” Econometrica, Jan. 1959.

*Wurtele, “Note on some stability properties of Leontief’s dynamic models,” Econometrica, Oct. 1959.

Solow, “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” QJE, Feb. 1956.

Jorgensen, “Growth and Fluctuation: a causal interpretation,” QJE, Aug. 1960.

Jorgensen, “A dual stability theorem,” Econometrica, Oct. 1960.

Malinvaud, “Capital Accumulation and Efficient Allocation of Resources,” Econometrica, April 1953.

Business Cycles

Baumol, Economic Dynamics, Ch. 7-11, 13-16.

Goodwin, “The Nonlinear Accelerator & the Persistence of Business Cycles,” Econometrica, Jan. 1951.

Allen, Mathematical Economics, Ch. 7-9.

Source: Harvard University Archives.  Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. Box 8, Folder “Economics, 1960-1961 (2 of 2).”

Categories
Popular Economics Suggested Reading Syllabus

Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle. Economics Readings, Topics for 1889-1890

The Chautauqua Institution established a four-year cycle of reading assignments that provided a popular college liberal arts education. Beginning in 1885 an introduction to economics was introduced into the program with an economics textbook listed every fourth year among the half-dozen or so books to be read by participants in the circle.

This post begins with a brief history of the Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle (a.k.a. the C.L.S.C.) followed by a list of the economics texts assigned during the first sixty-six years of the C.L.S.C. The economics content from the outline for 1889-90 published in the C.L.S.C. journal, The Chautauqua, is the core artifact of this post. As an added bonus, 140 questions and answers provided for study of Richard T. Ely’s textbook, An Introduction to Political Economy, have been included as well.

On October 24, 1889 the C.L.S.C. held an Adam Smith Memorial Day. Q&A’s for discussion were included in The Chautauqua.

___________________________

Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle.

Excerpt from “A Brief History of the CLSC”

…Bishop [John Heyl] Vincent [cofounder with Lewis Miller of the Chautauqua Institution] conceived the idea of the Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle (CLSC), and founded it in 1878, four years after the founding of the Chautauqua Institution.

At its inception, the CLSC was basically a four year course of required reading. The original aims of the CLSC were twofold:

To promote habits of reading and study in nature, art, science, and in secular and sacred literature

and

To encourage individual study, to open the college world to persons unable to attend higher institution of learning.

On August 10, 1878, Dr. Vincent announced the organization of the CLSC to an enthusiastic Chautauqua audience.

Over 8,400 people enrolled the first year. Of those original enrollees, 1,718 successfully completed the reading course, the required examinations and received their diplomas on the first CLSC Recognition Day in 1882.

The idea spreads and reading circles form.

As the summer session closed in 1878, Chautauquans returned to their homes and involved themselves there in the CLSC reading program. Many introduced the CLSC idea to their friends and neighbors and, in turn, additional groups were established for the purpose of studying and discussing the CLSC course of instruction. The concept of local “CLSC Reading Circles” spread and, by the turn of the century, over 10,000 “circles” had been formed.

Clearly, the rapid and widespread growth of the CLSC filled a deeply felt need for a structured program of reading and learning. As such, its importance both to the Chautauqua movement and to the spread of education was significant to the history of our country. Arthur E. Bestor, Jr., president of the Institution 1915-1944, wrote in his Chautauqua Publications: “Through the home reading courses of the Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle, it (Chautauqua) reached into innumerable towns, especially in the Midwest, and made education a powerful force in American life.”

The CLSC becomes a role model.

With the success of its program of planned reading, book selections
and local circles, the CLSC became the prototype for book clubs, study groups and university extension courses. According to the World Book Encyclopedia, the CLSC was “an example to American universities when they developed their extension programs, and influenced adult education leaders in such countries as England, Japan and South Africa.”

Dr. Vincent’s ideal yields nationwide results.

From 1878 through the 1920s the CLSC maintained a preeminent position in the field of adult education and augmented the general support for learning. This, in turn, prompted the spread of libraries in small communities, the extension of adult education, the growth of book clubs, the availability of book review services, the increasing opportunities for enrollment in institutions of higher learning, and the involvement of people in community life and social organizations generally.

More nationwide reading opportunities result in a period of decline.

The accumulated effects of the Depression, the spread of libraries
in small communities, the extension of adult education, the growth
of book clubs, the availability of book review services, the increasing opportunities for enrollment in institutions of higher learning and
the involvement of people in community life and social organizations steadily detracted from the influence of the CLSC….

Economics from the CLSC Book List:
1878-1944

1885-1886

George McKendree Steele. Outline Study of Political Economy. New York: Chautauqua Press, 1885.

1889-1890

Richard T. Ely. An Introduction to Political Economy. New York: Chautauqua Press, 1889.

1893-1894

Richard T. Ely. Outlines of Economics. Meadville, Penn.: Flood and Vincent, 1893.

1895-1896

Carroll D. Wright. The Industrial Evolution of the United States. Meadville, Penn.: Flood and Vincent, 1895.

1899-1900

Richard T. Ely. The Strength and Weakness of Socialism. New York: Chautauqua Press, 1899.

1903-1904

Richard T. Ely. Studies in the Evolution of Industrial Society. New York: Macmillan, 1903.

1907-1908

John R. Commons. Races and Immigrants in America. New York: Macmillan, 1907.

1910-1911

Edward P. Cheyney. An Introduction to the Industrial and Social History of England. New York: Macmillan, 1907.

1915-1916

Albert Bushell Hart, ed. Social and Economic Forces in American HistoryChautauqua, New York: Chautauqua Press, 1913.

1943-1944

John W. McConnell. The Basic Teachings of Great Economists. New York: Blakiston, 1943.

Source:  Chautauqua Literary & Scientific Circle. Book List 1878-2017.

___________________________

The Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle.
Books for 1889-90.

An Introduction to Political Economy. Ely $1.00

Bible in the Nineteenth Century. Townsend $0.40

How to Judge of a Picture. Van Dyke $0.60

Outline History of Rome. Vincent and Joy $0.70

Physics. Steele $1.00

Preparatory and College Latin Course in English. 1 vol . Wilkinson $1.30

___________________________

C. L. S. C. OUTLINE AND PROGRAMS.
FOR OCTOBER [1889]

First week (ending October 8).

“Political Economy.” Chapters I.-VII. inclusive.

Suggestive Programs for Local Circle Work:

The Lesson. (The uneven division of the work in Political Economy as laid out in the Outline is made that the work might be taken up by topics; first, the growth of industrial society; second, the characteristics of industrial society; third, the definition of political economy; fourth, the division, methods, and utilityof political economy.)

Second week (ending October 15).

“Political Economy.” Chapters VIII. and IX.

In the Chautauquan: Helen Campbell, Child Labor and Some of its Results (pp. 21-24)

The Lesson. (As marked out in the Outline)

Debate—Resolved: That the Government should abolish all restrictions on the rate of interest. (See Ely’s “Political Economy,” p. 79.)

Third week (ending October 23)

“Political Economy.” Chapters X. and XI.

**  **  **  **  **  **  **  **

Adam Smith Day.—October 24.

“The wise form right judgment of the present from what is past.”—Sophocles.

  1. Paper—Life and Character of Adam Smith.
  2. Questions on Adam Smith in The Question Table.
  3. A Symposium of Letters—The best method of national taxation. Each member is to write and read a letter addressed to the president of the circle, giving his views on this subject. He is to commend or censure the American system—that of protection—and show that it is either in harmony with, or in opposition to, the four maxims regarding taxation laid down by Adam Smith:

    1. The Subjects of every state ought to contribute toward the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities: that is, in proportion to the revue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.
    2. The tax which each individual is bound to pay ought to be certain and not arbitrary. The time of payment, the manner of payment, the quantity to be paid, ought all to be clear and plain to the contributor and to every other person.
    3. Every tax ought to be levied at the time and in the manner in which it is most likely to be convenient for the contributor to pay it.
    4. Every tax ought to be so contrived as both to take out and keep out of the pockets of the people as little as possible over and above what it brings into the public treasury of the state.

SPECIAL MEMORIAL, DAY.—ADAM SMITH.

  1. Of what nationality was Adam Smith?
    A. Scotch
  2. What happened him when he was three years old?
    A. He was carried off by Gypsies.
  3. His introduction as an author was made by an article in the Edinburgh Review on what famous book?
    A. Dr. Johnson’s Dictionary.
  4. Under what sobriquet is Smith spoken of in the “Noctes Ambrosiae”?
    A. Father Adam.
  5. Upon what work does his fame mainly rest?
    A. His book “The Wealth of Nations.”
  6. What probably induced this “Kirkcaldy recluse” to accept the office of traveling tutor to the young Duke of Buccleuch?
    A. The opportunity it would afford him for collecting facts for this book.
  7. What great event was transpiring in America at the time the “Wealth of Nations” was published?
    A. The opening of the Revolutionary War.
  8. If according to the historian Green, “books are measured by their effect on the fortunes of mankind,” what rank must be assigned to the “Wealth of Nations”?
    A. It must be classed among the greatest of books.
  9. Who said that it was “perhaps the only book which produced an immediate, general, and irrevocable change in some of the most important parts of the legislation of all civilized nations”?
    A. Sir James Mackintosh.
  10. What does Smith consider the only source of wealth?
    A. Labor
  11. What method of compulsory education did he propose?
    A. That every one wishing to enter upon a trade be required to pass a test examination.
  12. From what three classes or orders of civilized society did he contend came all the revenues which supply every other class?
    A. Landlords, laborers, and capitalists.
  13. From what great historian did the “Wealth of Nations” receive its first emphatic welcome?
    A. David Hume.
  14. What prime minister of England took the principles it taught as the ground-work of his Policy?
    A. William Pitt.
  15. What great event not long after its publication set England against the doctrines of political innovation taught in the book?
    A. The French Revolution.
  16. What change of opinion did Pitt undergo regarding Smith’s free trade notions?
    A. At first warmly participating in them, he became one of their leading opponents.
  17. What habit of Smith’s, indulged even in society, caused much amusement?
    A. The absent mindedness which led him to talk to himself.
  18. What acts showed his beneficent nature?
    A. Much of his ample fortune was spent in secret charities.
  19. What did he call himself in reference to his weakness, the collection of a fine library?
    A. A “beau in his books.”
  20. Throughout his life who was his closest friend?
    A. His mother.

Questions: pp. 97-98. Answers: p. 229.

**  **  **  **  **  **  **  **

Fourth week (ending October 31).

“Political Economy.” Chapters IX.—XV. inclusive.

Source: The Chautauquan. Vol X. No. 1 (October, 1889), pp. 87-88.

**  **  **  **  **  **  **  **

Questions and Answers.
On Ely’s “Political Economy.”

  1. Q. Of what science does political economy form a branch?
    A. Sociology, or social science.
  2. Q. What is sociology?
    A. The science which deals with society.
  3. Q. Into how many departments has social science been divided?
    A. Eight: language, art, science and education, family life, social life (in the narrower sense), religious life, political life, and economic life.
  4. Q. What is meant by economic life?
    A. That part of man’s life which is concerned with “getting a living.”
  5. Q. What forms a fundamental fact of economic life?
    A. The dependence of man upon his fellows.
  6. Q. In what respect does the economic life of a nation differ from that of an individual?
    A. The basis of national economy is political independence.
  7. Q. What is a state?
    A. The union of a stationary people, occupying a defined territory, under a supreme power and a definite constitution.
  8. Q. What are the two great factors in a national economy?
    A. Territory and man.
  9. Q. Cite one example showing the tendency of a national economy to change?
    A. Landed property was once largely common property; in civilized nations it came into the possession of individuals; now a reverse process is seen in the fact that forests are becoming public property.
  10. Q. Viewed from the standpoint of production, into what five stages is the economic progress of humanity divided?
    A. The hunting and fishing stage; the pastoral; the agricultural; the commercial; and the industrial.
  11. Q. Viewed from the standpoint of transfer of goods, how many economic stages are there?
    A. Three: truck economy; money economy; and credit economy.
  12. Q. What people are a type of the hunting and fishing stage?
    A. The American Indians.
  13. Q. Where are vivid pictures of people living in the pastoral stage found?
    A. In the earliest chapters of the Bible.
  14. Q. To what manner of life did the pastoral stage give rise?
    A. To the nomadic.
  15. Q. What was probably the earliest form of settled agricultural life?
    A. Village communities.
  16. Q. What remain to-day as witnesses of the former common ownership of land?
    A. The Boston “Common”’ and the “commons” of other New England towns.
  17. Q. What radical changes mark the commercial stage?
    A. Important cities arose along the sea-coast and on rivers; mines were worked; and the use of money became more general.
  18. Q. What made possible the far-reaching changes marking the industrial stage?
    A. The application of steam to industry and the improvement in the means of communication and transport.
  19. Q. With what periods was the truck, or barter, economy coincident?
    A. The hunting and fishing, the pastoral, and part of the agricultural periods.
  20. Q. What one fact is sufficient to show the change from money economy to that of credit?
    A. The fact that banks now form an essential part of the entire national economy.
  21. Q. What are some of the main causes for the existence of the present economic problems?
    A. The industrial revolution; the new importance of capital; the possibility of improvement; and the higher ethical standards.
  22. Q. What are some of the remarkable features of the recent development of the industrial revolution?
    A. Increased domestic and international commerce; corporations and trusts; problem of the working day; resistance to improvements; and sudden riches.
  23. Q. What great change in production occurred during the industrial revolution?
    A. Two of its chief factors, capital and labor, were separated.
  24. Q. What has been the result of this division?
    A. Capital has acquired a new power which has created modern socialism.
  25. Q. What is the wide-spread belief of reformers regarding the solution of this problem?
    A. That labor and capital must be again united, but they differ as to the methods.
  26. Q. In what are three characteristic features of modern economic life to be found?
    A. In the relations which it bears to freedom, to ethics, and to the state.
  27. Q. Under what condition has economic freedom ever been absolute?
    A. Under primitive anarchy.
  28. Q. In what way may real freedom be increased by restriction laws?
    A. Such laws may remove restrictions to liberty arising outside of law.
  29. Q. In what five ways does economic freedom manifest itself?
    A. Freedom of labor, of landed property, of capital with respect to loans, in the establishment of enterprises, and of the market.
  30. Q. What restrictions have been placed up on freedom of movement?
    A. Tramp laws, the anti-Chinese legislation, and a law forbidding contracts with foreign laborers to come to the United States to work.
  31. Q. In what respect is freedom of the market restricted in the United States?
    A. Heavy taxes are laid on foreign trade.
  32. Q. What is mentioned as the leading advantage resulting from a general freedom of the market?
    A. Competition would develop new forces, and reveal new resources of economy, excellence, and variety of products.
  33. Q. What disadvantages is it claimed would follow such a freedom?
    A. The moral standard of economic life would be lowered; and there would result longer hours of labor and cheaper prices.
  34. Q. What does ethics demand for the truly civilized life of each individual?
    A. That so far as possible each should be supplied with economic goods to satisfy his reasonable wants and afford the completest development of his faculties.
  35. Q. What is the basis of the economic life of modern nations?
    A. Individual responsibility.
  36. Q. What part, then, does the state enact in this life?
    A. It enters where the individual’s powers are insufficient.
  37. Q. Give the derivation and meaning of the term political economy.
    A. It comes from three Greek words and means the housekeeping of the state.
  38. Q. Give a definition of political economy in its most general terms?
    A. It is the science which treats of man as a member of economic society.
  39. Q. What is the true business of the political economist?
    A. To describe the best means for the promotion of the welfare of the people as a whole.
  40. Q. What aims does political economy distinctly include within its province?
    A. Ethical aims; it does not merely tell us how things are, but also how they ought to be, and shows that in many cases the general honesty which exists now as a mere matter of course was once a future ideal.
  41. Q. Into what three parts is political economy commonly divided?
    A. Into general eco nomics, special economics, and finance.
  42. Q. By what three methods is all knowledge acquired?
    A. The inductive, the deductive, and the statistical.
  43. Q. What term has been selected by the author as the most fitting to describe the laws governing political economy?
    A. Social laws.
  44. Q. What assertion is often made against political economy by business men?
    A. That it is not practical.
  45. Q. In return what assertion may be made against the opinions of business men?
    A. Their range of facts is too narrow, and each man is apt to be absorbed in his own affairs
  46. Q. What is brought forward as an illustration of this point?
    A. That the attempt to improve politics by putting practical business men in office has often resulted disastrously.
  47. Q. What elements have united in forming the science of political economy?
    A. Business, philosophy, jurisprudence, politics, and philanthropy.
  48. Q. Give examples showing how different systems of religion have affected the character of nations?
    A. The fatalism of the Turks led to indolence; the Jewish religion stimulated its followers to activity and accumulation; Christianity dignifies honest labor.
  49. Q. What service does political economy perform for law?
    A. It explains the reasons for a great part of the laws, their nature, and the principles which should govern them.
  50. Q. For what is a body of international law now needed as never before?
    A. To regulate international economic relations.

Source: The Chautauquan. Vol X. No. 1 (October, 1889), pp. 94-95.

___________________________

C. L. S. C. OUTLINE AND PROGRAMS.
FOR NOVEMBER. [1889]

First week (ending November 8).

“Political Economy.” Part II. Chapters I. and II.

Second week (ending November 15).

“Political Economy.” Part II. Chapters III. and IV.

“Questions and Answers on Political Economy,” in The Chautauquan.

Third week (ending November 22)

“Political Economy.” Part III. Chapters I. and II.

Debate—Resolved: That by granting private ownership in land the state permits a monopoly of one of the bounties of nature. (See text-book on “Political Economy,” pp. 77-78, 161, and 296-297.)

Fourth week (ending November 30).

“Political Economy.” Part III. Chapters III. and IV.

Debate—Question: Is the coinage of silver as authorized by the “Bland Bill” a source of financial danger to the United States?

Source: The Chautauquan. Vol X. No. 2 (November, 1889), pp. 217-218.

**  **  **  **  **  **  **  **

Questions & Answers
ELY’S “POLITICAL ECONOMY.”

  1. Q. What is the only operation man can perform upon matter?
    A. He can simply move it.
  2. Q. What can he produce by this action?
    A. Quantities of utility.
  3. Q What is the economic term applied to the creation of utilities?
    A. Production.
  4. Q. What is the term applied to the results of labor?
    A. Wealth.
  5. Q. If the quantity of cotton cloth should double between two censuses, and the price fall one half, would the wealth of the country be increased?
    A. It would be doubled.
  6. Q. What sets the limit to all production?
    A. The power of consumption.
  7. Q. What supply motives of economic activity to man?
    A. His wants.
  8. Q. Into how many classes may those things which man wants be divided?
    A. Into necessaries, comforts, conveniences, and luxuries.
  9. Q. What are luxuries?
    A. Whatever contribute chiefly to enjoyment, rather than to a better training of man’s powers.
  10. Q. What are the three factors of production?
    A. Nature, labor, and capital.
  11. Q. Considered in an economic sense, what is meant by nature?
    A. Simply land.
  12. Q. What is capital?
    A. Every laid-by product which may be used for further production.
  13. Q. What tendency marks the development of industrial civilization?
    A. It becomes constantly more complex.
  14. Q. What forms at present a characteristic feature in the organization of the productive factors?
    A. The division of labor.
  15. Q. To what part of political economy is the name exchange applied?
    A. To that dealing with transfers of goods.
  16. Q. What is value?
    A. The measure of utility.
  17. Q. What is price?
    A. Value expressed in money.
  18. Q. Upon what does price depend?
    A. Immediately, upon supply and demand; secondarily, upon cost of production.
  19. Q. What is money?
    A. A universal standard of value and a medium of exchange.
  20. Q. Under the different conceptions concerning it, what single form of money will pass as money in every sense of the word?
    A. Gold money.
  21. Q. When is paper money said to be redeemable?
    A. When government pays coin for it on demand.
  22. Q. How much paper money can be issued by a nation with safety?
    A. An amount equal to one-third of the government revenues payable in this kind of money.
  23. Q. What effects follow the arbitrary de crease or increase of the amount of money?
    A. In the former case burdens are added to every debtor; in the latter, creditors are robbed.
  24. Q. What is the established ratio between gold and silver in the United States?
    A. One to sixteen.
  25. Q. What is meant by the term demonetization of silver?
    A. The withdrawing it from current use as full legal tender.
  26. Q. What is meant by bi-metalism?
    A. The use of both silver and gold at a fixed ratio of value as legalized currency.
  27. Q. On what condition only could the introduction of bi-metalism be regarded with favor by economists?
    A. That it become an international measure.
  28. Q. What restriction does the Bland Bill lay upon the coinage of silver in the United States?
    A. Not less than $2,000,000 or more than $4,000,000 worth of silver must be coined every month by the mints.
  29. Q. What is John Stuart Mill’s definition of credit?
    A. Permission to use the capital of another person.
  30. Q. What instrument of credit is known as a check?
    A. An order on a banker by a person having money on deposit to pay to the bearer a certain specified sum of money.
  31. Q. What is a draft?
    A. A check given by one banker against another.
  32. Q. What are bankers?
    A. Middle men between borrowers and lenders.
  33. Q. What banks are allowed to issue notes which circulate as money?
    A. National banks.
  34. Q. What is a clearing-house?
    A. An institution designed to save for the banks of a city, time, labor, and circulating notes.
  35. Q. What is protection as used in political economy?
    A. A regulation which lays a tax on all imported commodities when similar commodities can be produced at home.
  36. Q. What are the two leading arguments of protectionists?
    A. The diversified-natural industry argument and the protection-to-infant industry argument.
  37. Q. What are the leading arguments of free traders?
    A. That protection is not needed to accomplish either of the above mentioned ends; that it is not a benefit to the laboring man; and that it fosters monopolies.
  38. Q. What reform is needed at the present time more than a tariff reform?
    A. That of municipal government.
  39. Q. What have been far greater forces in adding to the wealth of modern nations than the tariff policy?
    A. Inventions and discoveries, especially the application of steam to industry.
  40. Q. If it be true that American labor would be better off without it, why should the protective system not be removed suddenly?
    A. It is an historical growth which has taken deep root, and sudden removal would be dangerous.

Source: The Chautauquan. Vol X. No. 2 (November, 1889), pp. 225-226.

___________________________

C. L. S. C. OUTLINE AND PROGRAMS.
FOR DECEMBER. [1889]

First week (ending December 8).

“Political Economy.” Part IV. Chapters I-V. inclusive.

Book Review—“Looking backward.” By Edward Bellamy.

Debate—Resolved: That the formation of trusts and combinations are a development in the right direction. (See Ely’s “Political Economy,” p. 241.)

Second week (ending December 16).

“Political Economy.” Finish Part IV. Part V.

Third week (ending December 23)

“Political Economy.” Part VI.

Questions and Answers  on “Political Economy,” in The Chautauquan.
Debate—Resolved: That I have a right to know how much I shall do for the state, which is impossible under the present tariff system.

Fourth week (ending December 31).

“Political Economy.” Part VII.

Roll-Call—A written question on any point in political economy.
Table Talk—Discussion of the above named questions. (If preferred, the questions may be taken from the list in the back part of the text-book, or the whole time may be devoted to any one of these questions.)

Source: The Chautauquan. Vol X. No. 3 (December, 1889), p. 344.

**  **  **  **  **  **  **  **

Questions & Answers
ON ELY’S “POLITICAL ECONOMY.”

  1. Q. What is private property?
    A. The exclusive right of a person over economic goods.
  2. Q. In the case of what land in the United States was it felt that the individual elements in property encroached upon the social elements?
    A. That surrounding Niagara Falls.
  3. Q. Into what four parts are the products of industry usually divided?
    A. Rent, interest, profits, and wages.
  4. Q. What is rent?
    A. The annual return of land in itself.
  5. Q. What determines the amount of rent?
    A. The surplus yielded above returns on labor and capital.
  6. Q. What is interest?
    A. The sum paid for capital lent to others.
  7. Q. What determines the rate of interest?
    A. The opportunities for, and the fruitfulness of, investments.
  8. Q. What are profits?
    A. Whatever is left after paying rent, interest, and wages.
  9. Q. Under what circumstances do profits tend to equality?
    A. When the flow of capital is free—that is out of the power of monopolists.
  10. Q. What is the difference between capital and capitalization?
    A. Capital is the amount actually invested in property; capitalization is the amount at which property is valued.
  11. Q. What familiar form is often assumed by capitalization?
    A. “Stock-watering.”
  12. Q. What determines the wages of labor?
    A. The “standard of life” fixed for the laborer; called also the iron law of wages.
  13. Q. What methods have been found better adapted to keep the industrial peace than the ordinary wages system?
    A. The sliding scale of wages, and arbitration and conciliation.
  14. Q. What one factor of production is embraced in modern labor organizations?
    A. The laborers.
  15. Q. What are mentioned as some of the advantages secured by labor organizations for their members?
    A. Diminished intemperance; educational opportunities; and social culture.
  16. Q. What is meant by profit sharing?
    A. Securing to laborers a share of the profits in addition to their wages.
  17. Q. Where voluntary co-operation is carried out successfully, what good effects on character has it produced?
    A. It has made men diligent, frugal, intelligent, and considerate of the rights of others.
  18. Q. By what name is a coercive co-operation for productive enterprises known?
    A. Socialism.
  19. Q. What good service has socialism rendered?
    A. It has called general attention to social problems and to the need of social reform.
  20. Q. Of what American laws is it claimed that they create artificial monopolies?
    A. The tariff laws.
  21. Q. What other privileges are classed under artificial monopolies?
    A. Copyrights and patents.
  22. Q. What are natural monopolies?
    A. Those businesses which become monopolies on account of their own inherent properties.
  23. Q. What plan is advocated for the prevention of private monopolies?
    A. The limitation of charters for natural monopolies.
  24. Q. What is one of the most serious social evils of the present?
    A. Child labor.
  25. Q. What should be the constant aim of public authority and private effort, regarding social troubles?
    A. To anticipate and prevent their existence.
  26. Q. What is the meaning of consumption as used in political economy?
    A. The destruction of a utility.
  27. Q. When does consumption become wasteful?
    A. When nothing is left to show for it.
  28. Q. When is there most danger of a glut in the market?
    A. When least is produced, or in crises of industrial life.
  29. Q. What is public finance?
    A. That part of political economy which deals with public revenues.
  30. Q. At what are the annual revenues of the various governments of the United States—federal, state, and local—estimated?
    A. At about $800,000,000.
  31. Q. What would be the result if these governments received a surplus of money each year and kept it from circulation?
    A. A panic.
  32. Q. In the United States how alone can the money flowing into the treasury from the revenues get out again?
    A. In payment of claims on the United States.
  33. Q. What makes the importance of finance plainly apparent?
    A. A knowledge of the magnitude of the revenues and expenditures of governments in modern times.
  34. Q. Of what in general are these increased expenditures of government a sign?
    A. Of national health.
  35. Q. What are the three permanent sources of revenue?
    A. Productive domains, industries, and taxes.
  36. Q. How is it shown that by means of taxation popular rights have been secured?
    A. Monarchs were obliged to ask money of the people; the people granted them on condition of receiving their demands.
  37. Q. Do large expenditures of public money for the public ever prove ruinous to a nation?
    A. Not if the money to be collected is justly distributed among the people.
  38. Q. What are customs duties?
    A. Taxes on imported articles.
  39. Q. What are excise taxes?
    A. Taxes on articles produced in the United States.
  40. Q. What is one of the greatest evils against the present system of taxation?
    A. It is not properly proportioned, and falls more heavily on the poor than on the rich.
  41. Q. What seems the most promising remedy against the evils of taxation?
    A. An income tax.
  42. Q. When did political economy as a distinct science come into being?
    A. A little more than a hundred years ago.
  43. Q. Why did it not arise earlier as a separate science?
    A. Chiefly because finance and labor—its two most fruitful sources of inquiry—have only in modern times become questions of importance to governments.
  44. Q. What side of economics was taught and practiced in the Orient?
    A. The ethical side.
  45. Q. How did Aristotle regard industrial life?
    A. He strictly subordinated it to the higher callings of society.
  46. Q. What does the economic life of the Romans plainly show?
    A. The disastrous consequences of slave labor and of landed property.
  47. Q. In what particular does Christianity teach the opposite of all former instruction in economy?
    A. It asserts the honorableness of toil.
  48. Q. To what standpoint have modern economists arrived?
    A. That law, morality, and utility must harmonize.
  49. Q. What is the laissez faire theory of political economy?
    A. The non-interference of government in matters of trade.
  50. Q. In what two countries is the greatest activity in economics to be found at the present time?
    A. Germany and the United States.

Source: The Chautauquan. Vol X. No. 3 (December, 1889), p. 352-353.

___________________________

C. L. S. C. OUTLINE AND PROGRAMS.
FOR JANUARY. [1890]

First week (ending January 8).

Second week (ending January 15).

Third week (ending January 23).

In the Chautauquan: The Railroads and the State [by Franklin H. Giddings, pp. 413-417]

Debate—Resolved: The state ownership of railroads is the best remedy for the evils connected with the present system.

Source: The Chautauquan. Vol X. No. 4 (January, 1890), p. 472-473.

___________________________

C. L. S. C. OUTLINE AND PROGRAMS.
FOR FEBRUARY.

Second week (ending February 15).

In the Chautauquan: “Economic Internationalism.” [Richard T. Ely, pp. 538-542.]

Source: The Chautauquan. Vol X. No. 5 (February, 1890), p. 602.

___________________________

C. L. S. C. OUTLINE AND PROGRAMS.
FOR MARCH.

Third week (ending March 22)

In the Chautauquan: “The Nationalization of Industry in Europe” [by Franklyn H. Giddings, pp. 668-672]

Source: The Chautauquan. Vol X. No. 6 (March, 1890), pp. 729-730.

[Other economic writings in this issue]

Charles J. Little. Karl Marx. 1818-1883, pp. 693-698

George Gunton. Trusts and How to Deal with Them, Part I,  [Feb. 1890] pp. 573-575

___________.  Trusts, and How to Deal with Them. Part II. pp. 699-703.

 

Categories
Johns Hopkins Popular Economics Syllabus

Chautauqua University Extension. Three Lectures on Labor Movement. Ely, 1889

While preparing a later post on the economics component of the 1889-90 C. L. S. C. (Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle), I came across a reference to a syllabus for a series of lectures given by Richard T. Ely in Chautauqua, New York. I tracked down the three reports of the syllabus (transcribed for this post below) in the Chautauqua Assembly Herald which can be consulted on-line from what appear to be scans of microfilm images.

For a brief history of the Chautauqua Education Movement in the United States.

________________________

Chautauqua University Extension.
Lectures on the Labor Movement in the Hall of Philosophy
by Dr. Richard T. Ely.

I.
The Nature of the Labor Problem, August 7, 1889.
SYLLABUS OF TOPICS

  1. Introductory Remarks
    1. University Extension lectures are primarily for instruction and not for entertainment. They are to give popular presentations of serious subjects. Those who do not care for this sort of lectures are advised to remain away rather than annoy the lecturer and disturb the rest of the audience by coming and going.
    2. The character of the present course, which is an adaptation of class-room work.
    3. The examination at the close of the course.
  2. Comments on the Annotated Bibliography.
  3. The Existence of Social Classes.
    1. What is meant by classes? Stormonth gives this definition: “A number of persons in society supposed to have the same position with regard to means, rank, etc.” Webster’s definition is as follows: A group of individuals ranked together as possessing common characteristics.” Modern classes are industrial, especially in republics, but industrial pursuits are everywhere acquiring increasing importance in class-formation.
    2. Ancient and modern classes compared. The influence of occupation in early times seen in the castes of India. “Sir Henry Maine.”
    3. Law and industry as a basis of classes compared. Economic forces often more powerful than legal forces. Illustrated by the contrast between nominal and actual freedom. “The Tribe of Ishmael.”
    4. It is a mistake to shut our eyes to the fact of the existence of classes in the United States, and to the further fact that with us class lines are becoming more inflexible and difficult to cross. America is becoming more like European countries.
    5. The good and evil effects of the existence of classes. The ideal is the harmonious and helpful co-existence of classes. “For…the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that body being many are one body…But God hat tempered the body together, having given more abundant honor so that part which lacked, that there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another. And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; if one member be honored, all the members rejoice with it.”—St. Paul, First Epistle to the Corinthians. This bring us naturally to
  4. The solidarity of social classes.
    Modern society cannot prosper unless all parts participate in this prosperity, but wealth may increase while society decays. The oneness of society and the oneness of social life, illustrated by Professor Burrough’s Chautauqua sermon of Sunday, July 7, of this year.
    “While there is a single guilty person in the universe, each innocent one must feel his innocence tortured by that guilt”—Hawthorne in the Marble Faun.
  5. The labor problem, a problem of such real living importance that it may be called the problem of problems, but it must never be regarded as a class-problem.
    The error of the more radical forms of socialism in treating the labor problem as merely a class-problem, thereby promoting class-hatred and delaying social reform.
    The emancipation of the laboring classes can never be accomplished by the laboring classes alone.
  6. The true meaning of this phrase of Gladstone. The individual and social standpoint contrasted. The social standpoint illuminated by the labor problem.
    “A sense of wrong is a mighty strong eyewash. It will clear out a lot of sophisms which blind men’s eyes.”—Dr. Heber Newton—Also true of love. Illustrations taken from American and English experience, of social benefits from the agitation of the labor problem.

Source: Chautauqua Assembly Herald. Vol. XIV, No. 13 (August 7, 1889), p. 3.

________________________

II.
The Causes of Existence of the Modern Labor Problem
August 8, 1889.
SYLLABUS OF TOPICS

  1. Introductory Remarks
    The multiplicity of causes render their comprehension difficult.
  2. The organic character of all forms of social life, and the youthful features of the present politico-economic organism in civilized nations.
    The hopefulness of this view.
  3. Movement the law of life.
    The newness of our present economic life. Illustrations.
    1. Transportation one hundred years ago.
      Adam Smith, in 1776, assumes that beef and grain are too bulky to be transported with profit from Ireland to England. These are his words:
      “Even the breeding countries of Great Britain never are likely to be much affected by the free importation of Irish cattle. *** Even the free importation of Irish corn could very little affect the interests of the farmers of Great Britain. Corn is a much more bulky commodity than butchers’ meat. *** The small quantity of foreign corn imported, even in times of greatest scarcity, may satisfy our farmers that they have nothing to fear from the freest importation.” With this, contrast American competition in the supply of wheat and beef in 1889, in its effects on European agriculture.
    2. Banks One Hundred Years Ago.
      Banks have increased in number, and their functions have changed within fifty years.
      “in [illegible] the fourth bank was established, the Bank of Maryland, in the city of Baltimore, if I am not mistaken; and that bank was open one year before a single depositor came to its counters. Bagehot, the English authority, says that as late as 1880 all the discussions of bankers were upon the circulation and not at all upon the deposits of their banks. *** I looked at the bank statements of the banks of New York the other day, and the figures were these: The circulation of all banks was $5,000,000; the deposits of the banks in the same week were over $400,000,000.
      Seth Low in a speech before Boston Merchants’ Association, January 8, 1889.
    3. Corporations one hundred years ago compared with corporations and trusts to-day.
      One hundred years ago Adam Smith expressed the belief that corporations could not succeed on account of their inability to hold their own in competition with individuals and private firms. Now, the conviction is expressed that the individual as such is disappearing in industrial life, and Mr. Seth Low holds that this must be offset by increasing the importance of the individual in political life.
    4. Free Trade in Land a modern fact.
      Former system of land tenure in Europe and America.
    5. The Relative freedom of Trade and Commerce likewise Recent.
    6. The Free Choice of Occupations a new right.
    7. The freedom of migration a nineteenth century right.
      Illustrations of the former condition of the law taken from Adam Smith’s “Wealth of Nations.”
    8. The right of free combinations of labor and capital likewise a modern fact.
    9. The universal, personal freedom of the manual laboring classes, in all civilized lands, is a fact not a generation old.
      The opinion of Aristotle on slavery quoted.
    10. Capital, as we understand it, a force peculiar to modern times.
      “Such war cries as we find, Lassalle raising against capital would not have been understood among the ancients and the oppressed classes of the middle ages.”—Kaufman.
      Confirmation of this view found in Aristotle. The word “capital” not found in the index of Jowett’s Aristotle’s “Politics.”
    11. Railroads, telegraphs, telephones and other applications of steam and electricity very recent facts.
    12. The division of labor as now understood a recent fact.
    13. Our present manufacturing class a recent creation.
      The use of the word “manufacturer” in 1776.
    14. Some common materials are new discoveries.
      Cotton, anthracite coal, and protection.
  1. A new industrial world requires a new industrial organization and a new industrial science, but both the organization and the science are incomplete.
    As a consequence of the foregoing, progress produces long-continued social distress.
  2. Some of the results of the above described changes on the laboring classes.
    The changes a condition without which the labor problem would be an impossibility.

    1. Deterioration in the condition of the masses may be relative or absolute.
      The condition of the masses must be examined in both respects.
    2. Diminished security of [illegible word, “asistence”?]
      Illustrations taken from North and South.
    3. Irregularity of employment and income, and attended evils.
    4. Increased reparation of classes.
    5. Changed and deteriorated environment of the majority of wage-earners.
      “Beyond a doubt, sickness is the greatest foe of the poor. It absorbs their savings, creates poverty and pain, and fills our public and private institutions. It is the tenement house system that creates or fosters most of the prevalent disease, degradation, misery and pain. It invites pestilence and destroys morals.”— F. Wingate. [Charles F. Wingate]
      Father Huntington’s testimony quoted.
    6. Industrial and moral evils attendant on frequent migrations of wage-earners.
    7. Machinery both a blessing and a curse.
    8. Increased wants and their effect on the industrial situation.
      Character of these increased wants, some good, some bad.
      Table showing comparative percentage expenditure of working men’s families in Illinois and Massachusetts.
Items. ILLINOIS. MASS.
Subsistence 41.38 49.28
Clothing 21.00 15.95
Rent 17.42 19.74
Fuel 5.63 4.30
Sundries 14.57 10.73
[Totals] [100.00] [100.00]

Source: Chautauqua Assembly Herald. Vol. XIV, No. 14 (August 8, 1889), p. 3.

Cf. Table on p. 282 of Ely’s An Introduction to Political Economy (1889) .

________________________

III.
Industrial Evils and Their Remedies,
August 9, 1889.
SYLLABUS OF TOPICS

  1. Child Labor.
    “The number of males over sixteen engaged in manufacturing in 1880 was 2,019,035, an increase in ten years of 24.97 per cent. The number of females over fifteen was 531,639, an increase in the same time of 64.2 per cent. and of children 181,921, an increase of 58.79 per cent. ** The employment of women in all gainful occupations is increasing fifty per cent. faster than the population, or than the employment of men, and the same is true to still greater degree of the employment of children, save in the very few states which have stringent factory laws and make any genuine effort to enforce them.”— W. Bemis in the article “Workingmen in the United States,” in the American edition of the Encylopaedia Britannica. A workingman’s paper quoted on child labor in the coal mining regions. The testimony of President Crowell.
  2. The increasing number of women wage-
  3. The dwellings of the laboring classes in cities.
  4. Sunday work an evil of increasing magnitude.
    The opinion of workingmen on the “abolition of Sunday.” Is there any law of New Jersey in defense of Sunday? If so, why is it not enforced against the railroad corporations? When laboring men violate any law of the money power it is anarchy, and the law breakers are imprisoned or hanged. But when the money power violates all laws, both human and divine there is neither penalty nor remedy.
    “Look at the Central Railroad of new Jersey running coal trains every Sunday, compelling its employes to work upon that day. ** God knows it is hard enough to work for a mere pittance six days in the week, but it is intolerable to be compelled to work on Sunday for nothing as we do—to desecrate the Sabbath and to be deprived even of the boon of preaching. If this is not anarchy, what is it? And how much longer shall the Golden Calf rule in New Jersey?—Correspondence of John Swinton’s Paper.” Comment on the statement, “work on Sunday for nothing.”
    The agitation for a free Sunday on the part of the bakers in New York and Philadelphia. Remarks of the former secretary of the Journeyman Bakers’ National Union in a letter to the lecturer.
    The agitation of the Sunday question by other workingmen in New York; also in Chicago. Editorial in the “Knights of Labor” on Sunday slavery.
    The American Sabbath Union and the testimony of its secretaro, Rev. Wilbur F. Crafts.
    The true spirit of Sunday observance and the Sunday reform socially considered.
  5. Over-work and night-work:
  6. Excessive mortality of the wage-earning classes, especially of their children.
    This evil economically and socially considered. The principal causes of death are social. “Some 16,000 children under five die every year in New York—just twice the normal mortality for a large city. ** If viewed rightly, this would be called simply massacre.”— F. Wingate.
    Mortality among the white and colored people of the South:
WHITE. COLORED.
Memphis, 1888 19 37
Average for nine years 19 37
Chattanooga, 1888 16 33
Knoxville, 1888 13 29
Average for 8 years 14 31
Clarksville, av. for 2 years 13 28
Columbia, av. for 2 years 13 16

These cities are in Tennessee. Statistics for Columbus, Savannah and Atlanta, Georgia, for Richmond, Mobile and Charleston, are similar in significance.
Dr. G. W. Hubbard, of Meharry Medical School, gives four causes of the large mortality of colored people, viz., poverty, ignorance of the laws of health, superstition and lack of proper medical attendance.
“At present the average age at death among the nobility, gentry and professional classes in England and Wales was 55 years; but among the artisan classes of Lambeth it only amounted to 29; and while the infantile death rate among the well-to-do classes was such that only eight children died in the first year of life out of 100 born, as many as 30 per cent. succumbed among the children of the poor in some districts of our large cities. The only real cause of this enormous difference in the position of the rich and the poor with respect to their chances of existence lay in the fact that at the bottom of society wages were so low that food and other requisites of health were obtained with too great difficulty.”
Dr. C. H. Drysdale, in report of Industrial Remuneration Conference, 1885. Investigations of Joseph Korosi, director of municipal statistics of Buda Pesth. Comments on other data.

  1. Intemperance as an Industrial Evil
    Intemperance must be regarded both as with cause and effect.
    Music as a remedy for intemperance. Experiments in London where oratorios like “St. Paul,” the “Messiah,” “Elijah,” and Spohr’s “Last Judgment” have been appreciated by “crowds of the lowest classes, some shoeless and bonnetless, and all having the savor of the great unwashed; who sat in church for two hours ‘quietly and reverently.’” See Barnett’s “Practicable Socialism” p. 56. Testimony: “If I could hear music like that every night I should not need the drink.” A New York experiment.
    Positive measures required for the cure of intemperance and not merely negative. Working-men’s halls. The efforts of working-men in Baltimore. Modified Prohibition considered.
  2. Other Evils.
    “Pluck-me Stores.” Excessive immigration, monopolies, accidents, a wide-spread spirit of lawlessness, pauperism.

Source: Chautauqua Assembly Herald. Vol. XIV, No. 15 (August 9, 1889), pp. 6-7.

Image Source: The University of Wisconsin yearbook, The Badger 1894.

 

Categories
Agricultural Economics Chicago Iowa Minnesota Suggested Reading Syllabus

Minnesota. Course outline and reading for graduate macroeconomics. Brownlee, probably 1959

 

Based on a pamphlet in which he argued that “properly fortified margarine ‘compared favorably’ with butter in nutrition and palatability”, the economics Ph.D. student, Oswald Harvey Brownlee (1917-1985), brought the wrath of the Iowa Farm Bureau among others down upon himself and his economist seniors. After the President of Iowa State caved to the state’s dairy interests in the matter, Theodore  W. Schultz, D. Gale Johnson, and O. H. Brownlee were all to ultimately head off to the University of Chicago.

Oswald Harvey Brownlee. Putting dairying on a war footing, 64 page pamphlet published by Iowa State College Press, 1944.

See: Seim, David L. “The Butter-Margarine Controversy and “Two Cultures” at Iowa State
College.” The Annals of Iowa 67 (2008), 1-50.

Also mentioned in: Milton and Rose Friedman, Two Lucky People: Memoirs, p. 193.

Brownlee went on to teach at the University of Minnesota, where we found him teaching a graduate macroeconomics course. Clearly that was still time that the hatches separating microeconomics and macroeconomics were not so securely battened as today. “Public finance” was Brownlee’s major field so his broad fiscal policy interests make sense.

The course outline transcribed in this post comes from Martin Bronfenbrenner’s papers at the Economists’ Papers Archive at Duke University. Bronfenbrenner taught at the University of Minnesota from 1959-1962 and we can presume that the copy of Brownlee’s macroeconomics course outline with readings was for either 1958-59 or 1959-60.  A second, apparently later, version of the course outline for “Economics 176A” with “Brownlee” handwritten in the upper right corner is also found in the same folder. Three new readings from the second copy have been added and placed within square brackets below. The readings in Parts I and II, IX and X were not included in the second outline for “Economics 176A”.

_______________________

Handwritten note at top:
“Martin, Here is the outline for the Macro theory. Which part do you want to teach? [signed] Oz”

 

Economics 176A-B
Course Outline and Suggested Readings

This brief outline and reading list is intended to serve as a general summary of the materials to be considered during the course and as a guide to class discussion and to outside reading. The detail in the outline does not necessarily correspond to the detail in class discussion. The most significant readings are starred (*). The literature in this field has grown so rapidly during the past decade that this reading list cannot be considered as a complete bibliography of relevant writings.

It is hoped that during the quarter the student will gain an adequate understanding of how the equilibrium values of the relevant variables (gross national product, employment, the general level of prices and the rate of interest, for example) might be determined, and how changes in certain exogeneous variables (including various economic policy variables) might affect these equilibrium values. Although the primary emphasis of the course is on equilibrium levels of certain variables, an introduction to dynamic analysis (a description of the path of a variable over time) will be offered. This will provide the basis for subsequent discussion of business cycle theory and growth models.

  1. General Orientation of the Course
    1. Relationship of macro-static theories to other classes of economic theories
    2. Limitations of macro-static analysis as a basis for policy statements
  2. The firm’s Demand for Labor
    1. Importance for labor hired by business firms in the labor market as a whole
    2. Static theory of production with emphasis on the demand for labor.
      1. Nature of the firm’s production function
      2. Determinants of equilibrium level of employment within the firm
      3. Comparisons of equilibrium levels of employment under various resource market, product market and technological conditions
    3. Effects of Changes in Quantities of Other Resources Upon Demand for Labor

Readings:

1—K. E. Boulding, Economic Analysis, Chapter 31 (revised edition)

2—George Stigler, The Theory of Price, Chapters 6-11.

3—Paul A. Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Chapter 3, pp. 21-33.

4—Joan Robinson, Economics of Imperfect Competition, Books VII and VIII.

  1. Equilibrium in the Labor Market for the Economy as a whole
    1. Aggregation of outputs, labor inputs, wage rates and prices
    2. Determination of various combinations of general level of prices and “real” output which will maintain equilibrium in the labor market—an “aggregate supply” function.
      1. With money wage rate autonomously determined: a wage “floor”, a wage “ceiling”, both a “floor” and a “ceiling”.
      2. With supply of labor dependent upon “real” wages.
      3. With supply of labor dependent upon “real” and money wages: the effects of asset holdings.
    3. Degree of Determinateness of relevant variables given only equilibrium in the labor market.
      1. Price level, real output and employment not uniquely determined
        1. Various combinations of price level and real output will maintain equilibrium in labor market, given the autonomously specified money wage or given fixed monetary debts and credits and flexible money wages.
        2. Employment is determined only upon the real wage, real output and employment are uniquely determined, but price level is not.

Readings:

1.*—Jacob Marschak, Income, Employment and the Price Level, Lectures 19 and 20.

2.—Sidney Weintraub, Income and Employment Analysis, Chapters 11 and 13.

3.—Francis M. Boddy, et al., Applied Economic Analysis, pp. 229-248.

4.—O. H. Brownlee, Economics of Public Finance, pp. 47-51.

5.—Don Patinkin, Money, Interest and Prices, IX-XII.

6.—Louis Hough, “An Asset Influence in the Labor Market”, Journal of Political Economy, June 1955.

7.—Robert Solow, “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”, Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1957.

[8.*—Gershon Cooper, “Taxation and Incentive in Mobilization” in Readings in Taxation edited by Musgrave and Shoup.]

  1. Aggregate Demand for Goods and Services: The “Crude Classical Theory”
    1. The Quantity Identity
      1. The Demand for Money—a linear function of money income (expenditure)
      2. Assuming the supply of money (M) and the fraction of income which people with to hold as cash balances are independently determined, the equilibrium level of total money expenditure is determined.
      3. Effects of changes in money demand and money supply upon equilibrium level of money income or expenditure.
      4. Incorporation of assets as a variable influencing the demand for money
      5. Information obscured by the simple quantity identity (that omitting assets as a variable)
        (Note: further analysis of the quantity identity in terms of the kind of aggregate demand function for goods and services which it might imply will be made in subsequent sections).
    2. Equilibrium in the Labor, Money, and Commodity Markets under the assumption of the quantity identity.
      1. Quantity of labor supplied a function only of money wages
      2. Quantity of labor supplied a function only of “real” wages
      3. Division of “real” output between consumption and investment.

Readings:

1.*—J. M. Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, Chapters 2 and 19

2.—L. Klein, The Keynesian Revolution, Chapter 1 and the technical appendix, pp. 199-205

3.—Albert G. Hart, Money, Debt and Economic Activity, Chapters IV-VI and VIII

4.—Alvin Hansen, Monetary Theory and Fiscal Policy, Chapters 1-3

5.—Franco Modigliani, “Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money”, Econometrica, 12: 45-88 (January, 1944)

6.—Seymour Harris, (editor) The New Economics, Part IX, Chapter XLI

7.—Francis M. Boddy, et al., Applied Economic Analysis, Chapter 12, 13 (pp. 222-229)

8.*—Jacob Marschak, Income, Employment and the Price Level, Lecture 2.

9.—Don Patinkin, Money, Interest and Prices, I-VIII

10.—Archibald and Lipsey, “Monetary and Value Theory,” Review of Economic Studies, October, 1958

11.*—Milton Friedman, Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, Chapter I

12.—James Tobin, “The Interest-Elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash”, Review of Economics and Statistics, August, 1956

13.—H. Rose, “Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds,” Review of Economic Studies, XXIV (1956-57)

14.—Don Patinkin, Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds, Economica, November, 1958

15.—Vera Lutz, “Multiplier and Velocity Analysis: A Marriage”, Economica, February, 1955

16.—G. C. Archibald, “Multiplier and Velocity Analysis: An Amendment”, Economica, August 1956

[17.—Ira O. Scott, “The Availability Doctrine: Theoretical Underpinnings”, Review of Economic Studies, XXV No. 1, 41-48]

  1. Aggregate Demand for Goods and Services: The “Keynesian Theory”
    1. Equilibrium in the “Commodity Market”
      1. Consumption (and Saving)
        1. Relationship to income
        2. Relationship to rate of interest
      2. Investment
        1. Relationship to the rate of interest
          1. The marginal efficiency of capital
          2. Uncertainty and the level of investment
        2. Relationship to current income
      3. The Equating of Savings and Investment (Aggregate Demand for Commodities = Aggregate Supply of Commodities)
      4. Determination of various combinations of the rate of interest and real income which will fulfill the condition for equilibrium in the commodity market (will make savings = investment)
    2. Equilibrium in the Money Market
      1. The Liquidity Preference Schedule (The Demand for Money)
      2. With money supply (M) autonomously determined, there will be various combinations of the rate of interest, real output and the price level which will provide for equilibrium in the money market.
        1. The general case
        2. The special “Keynesian” case
    3. Simultaneous Equilibrium in the Money and Commodity Markets: An Aggregate Demand Function
      1. Equilibrium rates of real output and price level which fulfill the conditions for equilibrium in both the money and commodity markets.

Readings:

1.*—Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money

2.—The Keynesian Revolution (*particularly Chapter 3)

3.*—J.R. Hicks, “Mr. Keynes and the Classics”, Econometrica, 4: 147-159 (April, 1937); also included in Readings in Income Distribution, The Blakiston Co.

4.*—Franco Modigliani, “Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money”, Econometrica, 12; 45-88 (January, 1944)

5.—Alvin Hansen, Monetary Theory and Fiscal Policy, Chapters 4-6

6.—Sidney Weintraub, Income and Employment Analysis, Part II

7.—K.E. Boulding, The Economics of Peace, Chapters 7-9

8.—Wassily Leontief, “Postulates; Keynes” General Theory and the Classicists”, included in The New Economics, Part 4, Chapter XIX

9.—The New Economics, Parts 3 and 9

10.—Abba P. Lerner, The Economics of Employment, Part II

11.*—Jacob Marschak, Income, Employment and the Price Level, Lectures 3-18

12.—O.H. Brownlee, “The Theory of Employment and Stabilization Policy” Journal of Political Economy, Oct. 1950, pp. 412-24.

13.—Ira O. Scott, Jr., “An Exposition of the Keynesian System”, The Review of Economic Studies, XIX, (1), pp. 12-18

14.—Joan Robinson, “The Generalization of the General Theory”, included in The Rate of Interest and Other Essays.

15.—Louis Hough, “The Price Level in Macroeconomic Models”, The American Economic Review, June, 1954, pp. 269-86.

16.—Milton Friedman and Gary S. Becker, “A Statistical illusion in Judging Keynesian Models”, Journal of Political Economy, February, 1957

17.—L. R. Klein, “The Friedman-Becker Illusion,” Journal of Political Economy, December, 1958; and Friedman & Becker, “Reply”, same issue.

18.—Martin J. Bailey, “Saving and the Rate of Interest”, Journal of Political Economy, August, 1957.

[19.—Hans Brems, Output, Employment, Capital and Growth, Part I.]

  1. The Equilibrium Levels of Output, Employment, Prices and the Rate of Interest in the Keynesian System.
    1. Aggregate Supply and Aggregate Demand with Flexible Money Wages
    2. Aggregate Supply and Aggregate Demand with Labor Supply Perfectly Elastic at a Given Money Wage
    3. Effects of Changes in Autonomous Variables and Parameters
      1. The autonomous component of investment
        1. The multiplier
      2. Government expenditure for goods and services
      3. The export surplus
      4. Money wage rates
      5. Technology
      6. The degree of monopoly and employers’ market expectations
      7. Population and the labor supply
      8. The money supply
      9. Marginal propensities to consumer and invest
  2. An alternative Macro-Static System
    1. Some weaknesses in the Keynesian theory
      1. A change in the structure of the system required to explain U.S. postwar experience
      2. Increased savings: income ratio as income increases not empirically verified.
    2. Assets consumption as a variable affecting
      1. Real Assets
      2. Monetary assets (cash and government debt)
      3. Aggregate demand for goods and services when assets are included as a variable in the consumption function
        1. Comparison with quantity theory
        2. Comparison with Keynesian theory
    3. The Duesenberry-Modigliani Hypothesis
    4. Including assets in other Functions: Labor Supply and Demand for Money

Readings:

1.*—Don Patinkin, “Price Flexibility and Full Employment”, American Economic Review, 38: 543-64 (September, 1948).

1a.*—Don Patinkin, Money, Interest and Prices, XIII-XV and appropriate appendices.

2.—__________, “The Indeterminancy of Absolute Prices in Classical Economic Theory”, Econometrica, 17: 1-27

3.—__________, “Involuntary Unemployment and the Keynesian Labor Supply Function”, Economic Journal, LIX: 360-83

4.—Haavelmo, Hickman, Leontief and Phipps on Patinkin, Econometrica 18: 1-26 (January, 1950)

5.—James Tobin, “Money Wage Rates and Employment”, included in The New Economics, Part 8, Chapter XL.

6.—Arthur Smithies, “Effective Demand and Employment”, included in The New Economics, Part I, Chapter XXXIX.

7.—A. P. Lerner, “Mr. Keynes’ General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money”, Reprinted in The New Economics, Part 3, Chapter XI

8.*—Milton Friedman, “A Monetary and Fiscal Framework for Economic Stability”, American Economic Review, 38: 245-64 (June, 1948)

9.—A. C. Pigou, “Economic Progress in a Stable Environment”, Economica, 1947, pp. 180-90

10.—A. C. Pigou, “The Classical Stationary State”, Economic Journal, 53: 343-51 (1943)

11.*—James Duesenberry, “Income-Consumption Relations and Their Implications”, included in Income, Employment and Public Policy, Essay III in Part One, and as Chapter I in Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior.

[11a.—John H. Power, “Price Expectations, Money Illusion, and the Real-Balance Effect”, Journal of Political Economy, April, 1959, 1331-43.]

12.*—Franco Modigliani, “Fluctuations in the Saving-Income Ratio: A Problem in Economic Forecasting”, included in National Bureau of Economic Research, Studies in Wealth, Volume XI, pages 371-443.

13.—Paul A. Samuelson, “The Simple Mathematics of Income Determination”, included in Income Employment and Public Policy,” Essay VI in Part One.

14.—Oscar Lange, Price Flexibility and Employment, particularly Chapters I-V and IX-XI.

15.—Donald M. Fort, “A Theory of General Short-Run Equilibrium,” Econometrica, 13: 293-310 (October, 1945)

16.—Sidney Weintraub, Income and Employment Analysis, Part III

17.—G. L. Bach, “Monetary-Fiscal Policy Reconsidered”, Journal of Political Economy, LVII: 383-94 (October 1949)

18.—George Terborgh, The Bogey of Economic Maturity.

19.—A. P. Lerner, Economics of Employment, parts IV and V.

20.*—William Hamburger, “The Determinants of Aggregate Consumption”, Review of Economic Studies, XXII (1), pp. 23-34

21.*—Franco Modigliani and Richard Brumberg, “Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function”, included in Kenneth Kurihara, The Post Keynesian System—Essays in Honor of John Maynard Keynes.

22.—O. H. Brownlee, Economics of Public Finance, Chapters 3-6

23.—__________, “The Theory of Employment and Stabilization Policy”, Journal of Political Economy, October, 1950, pp. 412-24.

24.*—Milton Friedman, A Theory of the Consumption Function (particularly chapters 1-4.)

  1. Monetary-Fiscal Policy
    1. Effects of changes in government expenditures for goods and services, net tax collections, the tax structure and the supply of money on the demand for and supply of goods and services.
      1. In the Keynesian System
      2. In the Alternative System
    2. Built-In Flexibility vs. Ad. hominum [sic, “ad hoc”] changes.

Readings:

1.—Robert L. Bishop, “Alternative Expansionist Fiscal Policies: A Diagrammatic Analysis”, Lloyd A. Metzler, ed. Income, Employment and Public Policy.

2.—O. H. Brownlee, “Taxation and the Price Level in the Short Run”, The Journal of Political Economy, February, 1954, pp. 26-33.

3.—__________, The Economics of Public Finance, Chapter 6.

4.—Paul A. Samuelson, “Principles and Rules in Modern Fiscal Policy: A Neo-Classical Reformulation”, included in Money, Trade, and Economic Growth.

5.*—Milton Friedman, “the Effects of a Full-Employment Policy on Economic Stability: A Formal Analysis”, included in Essays in Positive Economics.

6.—E. Cary Brown, “The Static Theory of Automatic Fiscal Stabilization”, Journal of Political Economy, October 1955.

7.—Alfred Conrad, “The Multiplier Effects of Redistributive Public Budgets”, Review of Economics and Statistics, May, 1955.

8.—William A. Salant, “Taxes, Income Determination and the Balanced Budget Theorem”, Review of Economics and Statistics, May, 1957.

[9. Bent Hansen, The Economic Theory of Fiscal Policy.]

  1. Some Applications of Static Macroeconomic Analysis to Other Problems
    1. Disaggregated Systems
    2. Effects of Shifts in Expenditure and Income in One Sector upon Income in Other Sectors.

Readings:

1.—John S. Chipman, The Theory of Inter-Sectoral Money Flows and Income Formation.

2.—D. Gale Johnson and O. H. Brownlee, “Reducing Price Variability Confronting Primary Producers”, Journal of Farm Economics, May, 1950, 176-193.

  1. Macrodynamic Analysis
    1. The Nature of “Business Cycle” Theories.
    2. First-Order Difference Equations
      1. The Cobweb Theorem
      2. Lagging of Consumption or Investment by One Period
      3. Introduction of Disturbances
      4. A Dynamic “Keynesian” Model
    3. Models Involving Higher Order Difference Equations
      1. “Interactions between the ‘Multiplier’ and the ‘Acceleration Principle’”.
      2. Inventory decisions as related to changes in consumption or investment in Plant and Equipment.
    4. Problems of Prediction

Readings:

1.*—Paul A. Samuelson, “Interactions Between the Multiplier and the Principle of Acceleration”, included in Readings in Business Cycle Theory, 261-69.

2.—Mordecai Ezekiel, “The Cobweb Theorem”, included in Readings in Business Cycle Theory, 422-42.

3.—J. M. Clark, “Business Acceleration and the Law of Demand”, included in Readings in Business Cycle Theory.

4.—R. F. Harrod, The Trade Cycle, Chapter 2.

 

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archive. Martin Bronfenbrenner Papers, Box 25, Folder “Macroeconomics, Problems & exercises. 1 of 2. 1961-70, n.d.”.

Image Source: Douglas Clement, “A Golden History” in Minnesota Economics (Fall 2006), p. 2.

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Graduate Mathematical Economics. Syllabus and Final Exam. Chipman, 1952

 

 

John S. Chipman was born in Montreal, Canada, in 1926. He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in 1951, and taught at the University of Minnesota from 1955 to his retirement as Regents’ Professor in 2007.

Before going to Minnesota Chipman was assistant professor of economics at Harvard from 1951-55. This post provides a transcription of the course syllabus and final examination for Chipman’s “General Interdependence Systems”, a name he chose for the course he inherited bearing the nominal title of “mathematical economics”.

____________________

Course Announcement

Economics 214b (formerly Economics 204b). Mathematical Economics

Half-course (spring term). Tu., Th., 2:30-4. Assistant Professor Chipman.

General interdependence systems; in particular, Leontief linear systems. Properly qualified undergraduates will be admitted to the course.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Courses of Instruction, Box 6. Final Announcement of the Courses of Instruction Offered by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences during 1951-52 published in Official Register of Harvard University Vol. XLVIII, No. 21 (September 10, 1951), pp. 80-81 .

____________________

Economics 214b
General Interdependence Systems

Second Semester, 1951-52
Syllabus

*Texts

I STATIC LEONTIEF MODEL

*Wassily W. Leontief: The Structure of American Economy, 1919-1939, New York, Oxford University Press, 1951.

II DYNAMIC MODELS

*John S. Chipman: The Theory of Inter-Sectoral Money Flows and Income Formation, Baltimore, The John Hopkins Press, 1951

Richard M. Goodwin: “The Multiplier as Matrix,” Economic Journal, December 1949

________________: “Does the Matrix Multiplier Oscillate?” December 1950

________________: “Static and Dynamic Linear General Equilibrium Models,” (mimeographed, Littauer Library)

David Hawkins and Herbert A. Simon, “Note: Some Conditions of Macroeconomic Stability,” Econometrica, July-October 1949

Oscar Lange, Price Flexibility and Employment, Bloomington, Indiana, Principia Press, 1944, Appendix.

Lloyd A. Metzler: “Stability of Multiple Markets: The Hicks Conditions,” Econometrica, October 1945

________________: “A Multiple Region Theory of Income and Trade,” Econometrica, October 1950

________________: “A Multiple-Country Theory of Income Transfers,” Journal of Political Economy, February 1951.

Paul A. Samuelson: Foundations of Economic Analysis, Ch. IX and Appendix B

________________: “A Fundamental Multiplier Identity,” Econometrica, July-October 1943

Arthur Smithies: “The Stability of Competitive Equilibrium,” Econometrica, July-October 1942

Robert Solow: “On the Structure of Linear Models,” Econometrica, January 1952

Frederick V. Waugh: “Inversion of the Leontief Matrix by Power Series,” Econometrica, April 1950

III ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES (“LINEAR PROGRAMMING”)

*Tjalling C. Koopmans (ed.): Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1951.

________________: “Efficient Allocation of Resources,” Econometrica, October 1951.

Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen: “Leontief’s System in the Light of Recent Result,” Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1950

John von Neumann: “A Model of General Economic Equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies, October 1945.

 

MATHEMATICAL REFERENCES

(1) Matrices

R. A. Frazer, W. J. Duncan and A. R. Collar, Elementary Matrices, New York, Macmillan, 1947

C. C. MacDuffee, Vectors and Matrices, Menasha, Wisconsin, 1943

A. C. Aitken, Determinants and Matrices, Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd, 1948

(2) Difference and Differential Equations

P. A. Samuelson, “Dynamic Process Analysis,” in A Survey of Contemporary Economics, Philadelphia, Blakiston, 1948

R. G. D. Allen, “Mathematical Foundations of Economic Theory,” Q.J.E. February 1949

F. R. Moulton, Differential Equations, New York, Macmillan, 1930, Ch. XV

W. J. Baumol, Economic Dynamics, New York, Macmillan, 1951.

(3) Set Theory and Abstract Algebra

F. P. Northrup and Associates, Fundamental Mathematics, Vol. I, Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1948

Richard Courant and Herbert Robbins, What is Mathematics?, New York, Oxford University Press, 1941

Garrett Birkhoff and Saunders MacLane, A Survey of Modern Algebra, New York, Macmillan, 1950

Paul Halmos, Finite Dimensional Vector Spaces, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1948

 

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. Box 5. Folder: “Economics, 1951-1952 (2 of 2)”.

____________________

1951-52
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS 214b
[Final examination]

Answer both questions

  1. Consider an economy composed of n sectors (say industries and households) and described by the model
    {{y}_{i}}\left( t \right)=\sum\limits_{j=1}^{n}{{{a}_{ij}}{{y}_{j}}\left( t-1 \right)}+\,\,\,\,{{b}_{i}}\,\,\,\,\left( i=1,...,n \right)
    where yi(t) is the output of sector i at time t, of which bi is the exogenous component, and where the input-output coefficients aij are all taken to be non-negative. Assuming the economy to be initially in a state of equilibrium, show under what conditions an autonomous rise in all the bi

    1. implies an increase in the equilibrium values of all the sector outputs;
    2. causes all sector outputs to approach, with time, new equilibrium values.
      Compare and interpret these conditions.
  2. “A possible activity is efficient if and only if there exists a set of positive prices for all commodities, which give rise to zero profits on this activity and non-positive profits on all other possible activities.”
    1. Prove this theorem, keeping in mind the following two properties of convex polyhedral cones:
      1. The negative polar of the intersection of two cones is equal to the sum of their negative polars;
      2. The sum of two cones is equal to the sum of their dimensionality spaces if and only if the relative interior of the one cone intersects the negative of the relative interior of the other.
    2. Indicate a modification of the theorem, with the appropriate modification of the definition of efficiency, when availability limitations are specified on certain primary commodities, which are no longer regarded as “undesirable.”
    3. Outline the properties of the efficient set in (b) when there is only one primary commodity and there is no joint production.
    4. Discuss the usefulness, significance, and validity of the notion of an efficient set of activities as employed in (a), (b), and (c).

Source: Harvard University Archives. Harvard University, Final examinations, 1853-2001. Box 27, Papers Printed for Final Examinations [in] History, History of Religions,…Economics,…, Air Sciences, Naval Science, June 1952.

Image Source: September 1961 entry card for John Somerset Chipman (b. 28 June 1926 in Montreal).  Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, immigration Cards, 1900-1965 at ancestry.com.

Categories
Chicago Exam Questions Suggested Reading Syllabus

Chicago. Monetary International Economics, readings and exam. Metzler, 1967

 

Lloyd Metzler provided a token Keynesian voice with a Harvard accent at post-WWII Chicago. Once the Cowles Commission moved to Yale, Metzler found himself vastly outnumbered. And yet he persisted.

__________________________

Syllabus and readings for Economics 370 in 1950.

Exam for Economics 370 in 1953.

All Economics in the Rear-view Mirror blog-posts with Lloyd Metzler content.

__________________________

Biographical Note

Lloyd Appleton Metzler was born on April 3, 1913 in Lost Springs, Kansas. He attended the University of Kansas, where he studied economics under John Ise and earned a Bachelor’s degree in 1935 and an MBA in 1938. Metzler then entered Harvard University. He served as an instructor and tutor at Harvard and completed a Ph.D. in economics in 1942. His dissertation, “Interregional Income Generation,” earned him the Wells Prize. That same year, Metzler was the recipient of a Guggenheim fellowship.

From Harvard, Metzler went on to Washington, D.C., where worked for the Office of Strategic Services and several economic policy and planning commissions between 1943 and 1946. Metzler joined the research staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in 1944. In 1946 he returned to academia when he accepted a teaching position at Yale University. He soon left Yale for the University of Chicago in 1947, where he remained for the rest of his career.

Dr. Metzler survived surgery for a brain tumor in 1952, and with the help of his wife Edith, managed to continue teaching and writing for the next twenty years. He served as Editor of the Journal of Political Economy from 1966 until his retirement in 1971. Metzler made numerous contributions to business cycle literature, macro-monetary theory, tariff theory, mathematical economics, and the field of international trade. The Metzler paradox, Laursen-Metzler effect, and Metzler matrix, all bear his name. He died on October 26, 1980.

Source: University of Chicago Library. Guide to the Lloyd A. Metzler Papers 1941-48. Note: the interesting archival papers containing the following material are found in the Economists’ Papers Archive at Duke University.

__________________________

ECONOMICS 370
MONETARY ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Major Topics and Reading List

Winter 1967
Lloyd A. Metzler

  1. Mechanism of the Foreign Exchange Market
    1. P. T. Ellsworth, The International Economy, third edition, New York: Macmillan Company, 1964, Chapter 17.
    2. Alan R. Holmes and Francis Schott, The New York Foreign Exchange Market, New York: The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1965, Chapters 1-6.
    3. Frank A. Southard, Jr., Foreign Exchange Practice and Policy, New York: The McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1940.
    4. N. Crump, The ABC of the Foreign Exchanges, London: Macmillan and Company, Ltd., 1951.
    5. James E. Meade, Studies in the Theory of International Economic Policy, Vol. I, The Balance of Payments, London: Oxford University Press, 1951, Chapter 1.
  2. The Quantity of Money, the Rate of Interest, and the Price Level
    1. Sub-Committee on General Credit Control and Debt Management of the Joint Committee on the Economic Report, Hearings on the Question, What Should our Monetary and Debt Management Policy Be? 82ndCongress of the United States, 1952, pp. 688-7111, 691-698. (These pages include the testimony of Milton Friedman and Paul Samuelson.)
    2. James Tobin, “Monetary Policy and the Management of the Public Debt. The Patman Inquiry,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. XXXV, No. 2, May 1953, pp. 118-127.
    3. Robert V. Roosa, “Interest Rates and the Central Bank” in Money, Trade and Economic Growth, in honor of John Henry Williams, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1951.
    4. Lloyd A. Metzler, “Wealth, Saving, and the Rate of Interest,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LIX, No. 2, April, 1951, pp. 93-116.
    5. Robert A. Mundell, “The Public Debt, Corporate Income Taxes, and the Rate of Interest,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXVIII, No. 6, December 1960, pp. 622-626.
    6. George Horwich, “Real Assets and the Theory of Interest,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXX, No. 2, April 1962, pp. 158-169.
    7. Don Patinkin, Money, Interest, and Prices, first edition, Evanston: Row, Peterson and Co., 1956, Part. II.
  3. The Role of Money in International Adjustment: Full Employment and Under-Employment
    1. J. M. Keynes, Treatise on Money, Vol. I, The Pure Theory of Money, London: Macmillan and Company, 1935, Chapter 21.
    2. Lloyd A. Metzler, “The Theory of International Trade,” From A Survey of Contemporary Economics, Howard S. Ellis, editor Homewood, Illinois: R. D. Irwin, Inc., 1948.
  4. Free Market Exchange Rates
    1. A. J. Brown, “The Foreign Exchanges” in Oxford Studies in the Price Mechanism, Edited by T. Wilson and P.W. S. Andrews, Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1951, Chapters I (i) and II (ii).
    2. S. Alexander, “Effects of A Devaluation on a Trade Balance,” International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, Vol. II, No. 2, April 1952.
    3. Milton Friedman, “The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates,” in Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1953, pp. 157-203.
    4. Joan Robinson, Essays in the Theory of Employment, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1947, Part III, “The Foreign Exchanges.”
    5. Lloyd A. Metzler, “Exchange Rates and the International Monetary Fund,” in International Monetary Policies, Postwar Economic Studies No. 7, Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September, 1947.
    6. Rudolph R. Rhomberg, “A Model of the Canadian Economy under Fixed and Fluctuating Exchange Rates,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXXII, No. 1, February 1964, pp. 1-31.
  5. Forward Exchange Rates
    1. Paul Einzig, The Theory of Forward Exchange, London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1937.
    2. Paul Einzig, A Dynamic Theory of Forward Exchange, London, Macmillan and Co., New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1961.
    3. Alan R. Holmes and Francis Schott, The New York Foreign Exchange Market, New York: The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1965, Chapters 7-8.
    4. Paul Einzig, “Some Recent Development in Official Forward Exchange Operations,” Economic Journal, Vol. LXXIII, No. 290, June 1963, pp. 241-53.
    5. Paul Einzig, “Some Recent Changes in Forward Exchange Practices,” Economic Journal, Vol. LXX, No. 279, September, 1960, pp. 485-95.
  6. The Balance of Payments and the Concepts of Income
    1. R. F. Bennett, “Significance of International Transactions in National Income”, in Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. VI, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1943.
    2. U. S. Department of Commerce, Income and Output, 1958 supplement to the Survey of Current Business.
  7. The Theory of Income Transfers
    1. J. M. Keynes, “The Transfer Problem,” Economic Journal, XXXIX, No. 153, March 1929, pp. 1-7.
    2. B. Ohlin, “The Reparation Problem: A Discussion, I. Transfer Difficulties, Real and Imagined,” Economic Journal, Vol. XXXIX, No. 154, June 1929, pp. 172-78.
    3. J. M. Keynes, “The Reparation Problem: A Discussion. II. A Rejoinder” Economic Journal, Vol. XXXIX, no. 154, June 1929, pp. 179-82.
    4. J. Rueff, “Mr. Keynes’ Views on the Transfer Problem, Economic Journal, Vol. XXXIX, No. 155, September 1929, pp. 388-99.
    5. B. Ohlin, “Rejoinder to J. Rueff,” Economic Journal, Vol. XXXIX, No. 155, September 1929, pp. 400-4.
    6. J. M. Keynes, “Reply to J. Rueff,” Economic Journal, Vol. XXXIX, No. 155, September 1929, pp. 404-8.
    7. L. A. Metzler, “The Transfer Problem Re-considered,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. L, No. 2, June 1942.
    8. H. G. Johnson, “The Transfer Problem and Exchange Stability,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXIV, No. 3, June 1956, pp. 212-25.
  8. Postwar Monetary Conditions and the Position of the U.S. Dollar
    1. R. Hinshaw, Toward Currency Convertibility, Princeton University, Essays in International Finance, No. 31, 1958.
    2. R. Triffin, Europe and the Money Muddle, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957.
    3. C. P. Kindleberger, The Dollar Shortage, Cambridge: Massachusetts [Institute of ] Technology Press, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1950.
    4. R. Triffin, “The International Monetary Position of the United States,” in The Dollar in Crisis, S.E. Harris, editor, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., 1961.
    5. P. T. Ellsworth, The International Economy, third edition, New York: The Macmillan Company, Part VI.
    6. H. B. Lary, Problems of the United States as World Trader and Banker, Princeton University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1963.
    7. Triffin, The Evolution of the International Monetary System: Historical Reappraisal and Future Perspectives, Princeton Studies in International Finance, No. 12, International Finance Section, Princeton University, 1964.
    8. International Financial Arrangements: The Problem of Choice, Report on the deliberations of an international study group of 32 economists, International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University 1964.
    9. New Approach to United States International Economic Policy. Hearing before the subcommittee on international exchange and payments of the joint economic committee, Eighty-ninth Congress of the United States, second session, September 9, 1966.
    10. Ministerial Statement of the Group of Ten and Annex Prepared by Deputies, Statement of M. Valery Giscard d’Estaing, Chairman of the group, August 10, 1964.
    11. American Enterprise Institute, International Payments Problems, a symposium sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. 1966.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Lloyd A. Metzler

ECONOMICS 370
Course Examination
Winter, 1967

Answer all questions.

  1. Define two concepts of income which arise when one country (A) makes an annual income transfer to another country (B) and indicate the significance of each concept.
  2. Use the concepts above to show why, in a two-country economy, a presumption exists that the transfer will be more difficult if both countries require imported raw materials to produce than if both are self-sufficient in production. Without going into technical details, indicate why the theory for self-sufficient economies is correct despite this presumption.
  3. (a) Derive the conditions of balance in a full-employment open economy for the following markets: (i) the market for goods and services; (ii) the market for newly-issued securities (iii) the market for foreign exchange.
    (b) Show that if the first two markets are in balance, the country has neither a surplus nor a deficit in its balance of payments.
    (c) Show that if there is an excess supply (or deflationary gap) in both new securities and goods and services the country necessarily has a deficit in its balance of payments. Discuss the market mechanism which may eliminate this deficit, assuming full employment and flexible prices.
  4. The table below gives interest rates for 3-months U.S. treasury bills adjusted to an annual basis, as well as the spot rate and the 3-month forward rate on Canadian currency, each rate being defined as the U.S. dollar price of the Canadian dollar:

 

Period 3-month U.S. bills 3-month forward rate Spot Rate
(1) .05 $1.0025 $1.0000
(2) .04 $0.9975 $1.0000
(3) .03 $0.9950 $1.0000
(4) .04 $0.9900 $1.0000
(5) .07 $2.0050 $2.0000

On the basis of this information you are asked to compute, for all periods, the interest rate for Canadian 3-months bills on the assumption that all data lie on the Interest Rate Parity line. Show your computations.

Source:  Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Economists’ Papers Archives. Lloyd Appleton Metzler Papers, Box 3, Folder “Econ 370- Course Exams”.

Source Image: Posting by Margie Metzler on the Metzler Family Tree at the genealogical website, ancestry.com.

 

Categories
Exam Questions Harvard Suggested Reading Syllabus

Harvard. Economic Analysis and Public Policy, Readings and Exams. Smithies and Baldwin, 1956-57

While Harvard archive’s collection of old course syllabi and reading lists offers a treasure chest of material, there still are plenty of “missing observations” and lost pages between us and a complete record. Fortunately there is often significant inertia in the actual syllabi so that interpolation is less hazardous than one might expect in filling the gaps. As noted below, the reading list for the Spring term was not found in the corresponding folder for Harvard economics course syllabi in the Harvard archives.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Arthur Smithies’ syllabus for this course as taught in 1949-50 has been transcribed and posted.

Robert Baldwin’s reading lists and exams for 1955-56 have been likewise transcribed and posted.

________________________

Course Enrollment

[Economics] 206. Economic Analysis and Public Policy. Professor Smithies and Assistant Professor Baldwin. Full course.

(F) Total 49: 9 Graduates, 36 Other Graduates, 1 Senior, 1 Radcliffe, 2 Others.
(S) Total 51: 10 Graduates, 37 Other Graduates, 1 Senior, 1 Radcliffe, 2 Others.

Source: Harvard University. Report of the President of Harvard College 1956-57, p. 70.

________________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Department of Economics

Economics 206
Reading List, Fall 1956

  1. Economic Analysis and Public Policy

F. H. Knight, “Economic Objectives in a Changing World,” Economics and Public Policy, The Brookings Institution, 1955.

A. Smithies, “Economic Welfare and Policy,” Ibid.

  1. The Ricardian System

David Ricardo, Principles of Political Economy, Chs. 2-6, 21.

W. J. Baumol, Economic Dynamics, Ch. 2.

Suggested:

Ricardo, Chs. 1, 31

G. J. Stigler, “The Ricardian Theory of Value and Distribution,” The Journal of Political Economy, LX, 3 (June 1952).

J. S. Mill, Principles of Political Economy, Bk. 3, Ch. 6 and 14;

Mimeographed paper on Smith and Ricardo*

  1. Marxian Dynamics

Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Preface.

M. M. Bober, Karl Marx’s Interpretation of History, Chs. 1-3, 9-13.

Suggested:

Joan Robinson, An Essay on Marxian Economics.

P. Sweezy, The Theory of Capitalist Development, Chs. 4-6, 8, 9,

J. A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Part I.

Mimeographed paper on Marx*

  1. The Neo-classical System

L. Walras, Elements of Pure Economics, Part I.

G. Cassel, The Theory of Social Economy, Ch. 4

W. S. Jevons, The Theory of Political Economy, Introduction.

Suggested:

E. Phelps Brown, Framework of the Pricing System

  1. The Schumpeterian System

J. A. Schumpeter, Business Cycles, Vol. I, Chs. 3, 4.

J. A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Part II

Suggested:

J. A. Schumpeter, The Theory of Economic Development.

Mimeographed paper on Schumpeter*.

  1. Keynesian Economics

J. M. Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, Ch. 19.

D. Dillard, The Economics of J. M. Keynes, Chs. 2, 3.

A. Hansen, Business Cycles and National Income, Part II

Suggested:

A. Hansen, A Guide to Keynes

J. M. Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money.

  1. Post-Keynesian Growth Theorists

E. Domar, “Expansion and Employment,” American Economic Review, March 1947.

W. Baumol, op. cit., Ch. 4

Suggested:

R. Harrod, Towards a Dynamic Economics, Ch. 3.

D. Hamberg, Economic Growth and Instability, Ch. 2, 3

*Available in Lamont and Littauer Libraries.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Syllabi, course outlines and reading lists in Economics, 1895-2003. Box 6, Folder: “Economics, 1956-1957 (1 of 2).

________________________

1956-57
HARVARD UNIVERSITY

Economics 206
Fall 1956
Final Examination

Answer FIVE of the following seven questions.

  1. What conclusions can be drawn concerning the optimization of resource allocation in a competitive versus a monopolistic economy? Consider the problem under both static and dynamic conditions.
  2. Analyze the possible employment effects of an increase in the money supply in the Keynesian and the neo-classical aggregate models.
  3. Both Ricardo and Marx assert that real wages tend to be driven to a subsistence level in the long-run. Contrast the reasoning of these two writers in reaching this conclusion.
  4. Contrast the reasons why the classical writers were pessimistic about development prospects under capitalism whereas the neo-classical economists were quite optimistic about growth possibilities.
  5. Neo-classical writers claim that long-run equilibrium at a less than full employment level is impossible. Keynesians, on the other hand, assert that less than full employment equilibrium is possible. Carefully explain the reasons why these two groups differ on this point.
  6. What were the major policy recommendations of Ricardo? Analyze how, according to Ricardo, the adoption of these measures would postpone the arrival of the stationary state.
  7. Contrast the role of the interest rate as a determinant of investment in the Schumpeterian, neo-classical, and Keynesian models.

Source: Harvard University Archives. Final examinations, 1853-2001. Box 25, Volume: Papers Printed for Final Examinations [in] History, History of Religions, …, Economics, …, Naval Science, Air Science, January 1957.

________________________

Note: The reading list for Economics 206, Spring Term 1957 was not found in the Harvard archives with the other filed course syllabi from 1956-57.

________________________

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Economics 206

Spring Examination, 1957

Answer FOUR of SEVEN.

  1. a) Under what conditions could the U.S. economy achieve uninterrupted growth? Do you think these conditions are likely to prevail?
    b) What sort of obstacles to steady growth would you expect to find in the U.S. economy? Are they self-correcting or would you recommend specific policies to overcome them?
  2. Is an equal or unequal distribution of income more compatible with the achievement of steady growth? What are the chief determinants of income distribution in the United States? Would you expect a shift in distribution as the economy grows?
  3. Analyze the causes of inflationary pressure. With our present institutional arrangements, what policy measures would you advocate to alleviate an inflation? Discuss any changes in present institutions that you feel would be desirable for combating inflation. Would your policy measures change if you were operating under changed legal or institutional arrangements? (i.e. Would you use the same instruments in a different way?)
  4. What is the meaning of balance of payments disequilibrium? How would you deal with such a disequilibrium in a country that had a goal of maximizing economic growth?
  5. Do you think there was a fundamental change in the U.S. economy between the prosperous ‘20’s and the depressed ‘30’s or between the ‘30’s and the post World War II era? If so, what were these changes and how do they contribute to an explanation of the behavior of the economy in these periods? If not, how would you explain the mixed performance of the economy?
  6. How can the traditional theory of the firm be used to explain the distribution of income? Would the theory lead you to expect a different distribution in an imperfectly competitive economy than in a purely competitive one?
  7. Are large budgets consistent with equilibrium growth? What effect on growth would an increase in government expenditure have if (a) it is deficit financed, (b) it is tax financed?

Source: Harvard University Archives. Final examinations, 1853-2001. Volume 113 (HUC 7000.28) Final Exams—Social Sciences—June 1957: Papers Printed for Final Examinations [in] History, History of Religions, …, Economics, …, Naval Science, Air Science, June 1957.

Image Sources:  (Left) John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation website. Arthur Smithies (1955 Fellow); (Right) Robert Baldwin from Selection from photograph (ca. 1975) of Robert E. Baldwin from the University of Wisconsin Archives/The University of Wisconsin Collection/The UW-Madison Collection/UW-Madison Archives Images.