Categories
Chicago Exam Questions

Chicago. Economic Theory Prelim Exam for PhD and AM, 1960

 

The economic theory  preliminary examination committee for the summer quarter of 1960 at the University of Chicago consisted of Milton Friedman (chairman), Martin J. Bailey and Lawrence Fisher. 

Previous posts with University of Chicago preliminary examinations for Ph.D. and A.M.  degrees:

Preliminary Exam (Money and Banking) 1956

Preliminary Exam (Money and Banking) 1959

Preliminary Exam (Price Theory) 1964

Preliminary Exam (Price Theory) 1969

Preliminary Exam (Macroeconomics) 1969

Preliminary Exam (Money and Banking) 1969

Preliminary Exam (International Trade) 1970

Preliminary Exam (Price Theory) 1975

Preliminary Exam (Industrial Organization) 1977

Preliminary Exam (History of Economic Thought) 1989

___________________

ECONOMIC THEORY (Old Rules)
Preliminary Examination for the Ph.D. and A.M. Degrees
Summer Quarter 1960

WRITE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON YOUR EXAMINATION PAPER:

Your Code Number and NOT your name
Name of Examination
Date of Examination

Results of the examination will be sent to you by letter.
Answer all questions. Time: 4 hours.

 

  1. [22 points, 2 each] Define briefly the following terms and indicate their use in economic theory:
    1. Backward bending supply curve
    2. Giffen effect
    3. Composite demand
    4. Elasticity of substitution
    5. Exhaustion of product
    6. Marginal value product
    7. Sunk costs
    8. Rent
    9. Firm
    10. Present value
    11. Rate of time preference
  2. [10 points] Describe the cost curves for an individual firm, explaining the relation between short-run and long-run curves, average and marginal cost curve. Explain the equilibrium of the firm for various market conditions of competition.
    b. [5 points] Describe the demand curves on the part of the individual firm for factors of production under various market conditions of competition.
    c. [5 points] Demonstrate that (a) and (b) are fundamentally translations of one another.
  3. [15 points] The U.S. Steel Corporation produces about one-third of the total ingot steel production in the United States (and a similar proportion of mill shapes and other forms of steel sold to steel-using industries). If the price elasticity of demand for steel is -0.5, what is the minimum absolute value of the elasticity of demand facing the U.S. Steel Corporation? What is the maximum absolute value? What can you conclude, without further information, about the monopoly power of the U.S. Steel Corporation? What further information, if any, would be relevant, and why?
  4. It is sometimes alleged that unionized firms are not injured by competition with non-union firms in the same industry because the presence of the union wage scale and working conditions enables the firm to obtain better quality labor, to have better labor morale and labor relations, etc.
    1. [10 points] Analytically, are these arguments well-founded? Discuss.
    2. [10 points] What data would you need on union and non-union firms to confirm or reject these arguments as an empirical proposition? In particular, would you use comparative output per man-hour, unit labor costs, or what? Why one and not another?
  5. A consumer buys in perfectly competitive markets, spending all of his income. Over a period of time his income changes and prices change, but it is our hypothesis that his tastes do not change.
    1. [10 points] Assuming no price-income situation was every exactly repeated, what possible behavior on his part, if any, could contradict our hypothesis? Why?
    2. [10 points] If the hypothesis is not contradicted, and if we then assume it to be correct, can we also assume that his indifference curves are everywhere convex to the origin? What possible behavior on his part, if any, could contradict the assumption of convexity to the origin? Why?
  6. [15 points] What are Marshall’s four propositions on derived demand? What subsequent contributions have been made concerning these propositions? In the light of these contributions, how would the propositions now be correctly and fully stated?
  7. [20 points] Write a brief essay on TWO of the following men and their contributions to economics:
    1. Hume
    2. Dupuit
    3. Von Thünen
    4. Menger
    5. Jevons
    6. Edgeworth
    7. Taussig
    8. Mitchell

 

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Milton Friedman Papers. Box 76, Folder 2 “University of Chicago ‘Economic Theory’”.

Image Source: Milton Friedman. University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf1-06238, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.

Categories
Exam Questions Minnesota Suggested Reading Syllabus

Minnesota. Readings and Final Exam for National Income and Wealth. Friedman, 1946

 

 

The course materials transcribed for this post are found in a folder in Milton Friedman’s papers at the Hoover Institution with the label “University of Chicago. Econ 129”. The handwriting on the folder is that of an archivist (i.e. not Friedman) and the material in the folder is neither dated nor can the name of the university be found. The most recent publication included in the reading list is from February 1946 (“Recent Figures…”). Also there is an item in the reading list “Blakey et al., Analyses of Minnesota Incomes, Parts One and Two” that points to the state of Minnesota. Milton Friedman did teach economics and statistics at the University of Minnesota for the academic year 1945-46 and no graduate course at the University of Chicago had a course number in the 100’s. Further, the academic calendar in Minnesota, like Chicago, followed a quarter system. Thus it seems almost certain that we are dealing with a course that Milton Friedman taught at the University of Minnesota during the latter quarters of the 1945-46 academic year. I don’t have access to the course catalogue from Minnesota for that year, so this should be easy to verify conclusively down the road.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

O-M [typed in the upper left corner]

Description of proposed course in “Statistical Economics”

  1. Purpose: The course proposed is designed primarily to provide training in the quantitative analysis of economic problems. As a by-product it should also acquaint the student with some coherent body of quantitative data and some important empirical studies.
  2. Content: The emphasis in the course would be on research method: the utilization of statistical data, statistical method, and theoretical analysis to attack an economic problem. The approach to method would be via substantive empirical work in particular fields. The fields considered would shift from quarter to quarter.

For the first quarter, it is proposed to consider.

National Income and Wealth: concepts of income and wealth—problems of valuation, treatment of government contribution and of gifts, capital gains, and other borderline items; problems of measurement—techniques of measurement, sources of data, estimates for segments of the economy for which data are scanty, precision of estimates; distribution of income by industry, type of payment, final product, and region; distribution of income and wealth by size; uses and misuses of income and wealth data.

Basic text material: Simon Kuznets, National Income and its Composition; Studies in Income and Wealth; Consumer Incomes in the United States; Department of Commerce publications and British white papers on national income.

For subsequent quarters, possible topics are:

Secular movements: Statistical studies of long-run changes in economic activity in the United States; examination of evidence bearing on “mature economy” or “stagnation” thesis.

Economies of scale: Empirical work on the relation of the size of enterprises to their economic efficiency, including conceptual problems in measuring economic efficiency and in distinguishing private from social economics of scale, statistical derivation of cost curves, and studies of profits in relation to size of enterprise.

  1. Potential students: Seniors and graduate students, particularly those interested in economic research
  2. Prerequisites: B.A. 101-102; B.A. 112. Undergraduates with consent of instructor..
  3. Duration: One quarter.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Syllabus and Readings for
Economics 129: Statistical Economics

Topic: National Income and Wealth

Note: Starred readings are required; others are recommended.

  1. Recent figures on National Income and National Products

*Survey of Current Business, February 1946, pp. 4 to 9.

  1. Concepts of National Income and Wealth

General:

*Hicks and Hart, pp. 125-232.
Kuznets, National Income and Capital Formation, pp. 1-7.
*Kuznets, National Income and its Composition, pp. 1-60.
*Hicks, Value and Capital, pp. 171-181.
Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. II, pp. 1-82; *Vol. III, Preface (vii-xv).
J.E. Meade and R. Stone, “The Construction of Tables of National Income, Expenditure, Savings and Investment”, Economic Journal, June-Sept., 1941, pp. 216-33.

Capital gains:

Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. I, pp. 97-101, 159-62.

Government Services:

Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. Two, pp. 317-27; Vol. Six, pp. 1-44.
J.R. and U.K. Hicks, “Public Finance in the National Income”, Review of Economic Studies, Feb. 1939, pp. 147-55.

  1. Concept of Gross National Product

*Gilbert and Jaszi, “National Product and Income Statistics”, Dun’s Review, 1944

  1. Measurement

*Kuznets, National Income and its Composition I, pp. 96-132, Vol. II, pp. 475-537.

  1. Correction for Price Change

*Keynes, Treatise on Money, Vol. I, pp. 95-120.
Studies in Income and Wealth, Volume II, pp. 85-135.

  1. Temporal changes in National income in the United States

*Kuznets, National Income and its Composition, pp. 135-160.
Kuznets, National Income and Capital Formation, pp. 8-11.

  1. British estimates

*British White Paper Cmd. 6623. (Reprinted in Federal Reserve Bulletin, August, 1945).

  1. Distributions of income

1.  By Industry

Kuznets, National Income and Capital Formation, pp. 12-22.
*Kuznets, National Income and its Composition, pp. 161-214.

2. By type of payment

Kuznets, National Income and Capital Formation, pp. 23-28.
*Kuznets, National Income and its Composition, pp. 215-265.

3. By Final Product

Kuznets, National Income and Capital Formation, pp. 34-57.
*Kuznets, National Income and its Composition, pp. 266-291.

4. By region

F. Schwartz, “State Income Payments in 1944”, Survey of Current Business, August 1945.

5. By size

*National Resources Committee, Consumer Incomes in the United States.
Studies in Income and Wealth, Volume V, Income Size Distributions, Part I, pp. 1-98.
Blakey et al., Analyses of Minnesota Incomes, Parts One and Two.

 

Economics 129: Statistical Economics
Books on Reserve

Main Library

R.G. Blakey, Wm. Weinfeld, J.E. Dugan, A.L. Hart, Analyses of Minnesota Incomes, 1938-39.
Clark, Colin, The Conditions of Economic Progress.
Clark, Colin, National Income and Outlay.
Fabricant, Solomon, Capital Consumption and Adjustment.
Hicks, J.R., Value and Capital.
Keynes, J.M., A Treatise on Money.
Kuznets, Simon, National Income and Capital Formations.
Kuznets, Simon, National Income and its Composition (2 Volumes).
W.C. Mitchell, W.I. Kerg, F.R. Macauley, and O.W. Knauth, Income in the United States (2 volumes).
Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, Studies in Income and Wealth, Volumes I, II, III, V, VI.
National Resources Committee, Consumer Incomes in the United States.

Materials Room

Barger, Harold, Outlay and Income in the United States, 1921-38.
J.R. Hicks and A.G. Hart, The Social Framework of the American Economy.
Kuznets, Simon. National Income and its Composition.
Martin, R.F., National Income in the United States, 1799-1938.
Conference on Research in Income and wealth, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. V, Part I.

 

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Final Examination
Economics 129—Statistical Economics

The Income payments concept differs from national income in part…

  1. T or F…because the former excludes and the latter includes undistributed corporate profits;
  2. T or F …because relief benefits are included in the former and excluded from the latter;
  3. T or F …because food consumed on the farm is excluded from the former and included in the latter;
  4. T or F …because imputed rents are excluded from the former and included in the latter;
  5. T or F …and because social security taxes are excluded from the former and included in the latter.
  6. T or F Imputed rents are not included in the Department of Commerce estimates of national income but are include in Kuznets.
  7. T or F In a self-contained economy without government national income would equal gross national product.
  8. T or F In Commerce Department estimates the value of government product is measured by taxes except for education.
  9. T or F “Transfer payments” are gifts from one individual to another.
  10. T or F A major difference between national income and gross national product is dividend payments to foreigners.
  11. T or F The growth of Victory gardens was in part responsible for the rise of national product from 1940 to 1943.
  12. T or F Undistributed corporate profits plus individual savings equals net capital formation plus government deficit.
  13. T or F Product of non-profit institutions is valued at cost in national product.
  14. T or F Government savings in Kuznets’ estimates is measured by excess of receipts over expenditures.
  15. T or F Business taxes includes all taxes paid by business except excess profits taxes.
  16. T or F Capital outlays charged to current expense are items of fixed capital that become obsolete within the year.
  17. T or F Business savings are equal to undistributed profits plus expenditures on plant and equipment.
  18. T or F The adjustment for inventory revaluation is designed to eliminate changes in value due to spoilage, change of style, and fire losses.
  19. _____ Which of the following was not an important factor in our economic mobilization for war? [choose “a”, “b”, “c”, or “d”]
    (a) Curtailment of gross capital formation
    (b) Curtailment of consumers non-durable goods expenditures
    (c) Increase in average hours worked per week
    (d) Heavy government expenditures for plant and equipment
  20. T or F The basic source of profits estimates in the national income is Statistics of Income.
  21. T or F The method used to derive estimates of wages in manufacturing is number of employed multiplied by average wages.
  22. T or F Advertising is treated as investment in the national product.
  23. T or F In estimating wages allowance is made for expenses involved for transportation to and from work.
  24. T or F Gross capital formation includes all automobiles produced but no other consumers durable goods.
  25. T or F Capital gains and losses are not allowed for in the national income except in the case of security and commodity brokers.
  26. T or F Subsistence of the armed forces is included in the national income because war expenditures are in essence a type of capital formation.
  27. T or F National debt interest is included in the national income because of Hamilton’s theory that the debt would strengthen the union.
  28. T or F The British include interest on the national debt as a measure of the services of government property.
  29. T or F Income payments to individuals could be derived entirely by adding up income reported for tax purposes if everyone were required to file a return.
  30. T or F Size distribution of income must be based upon income payments rather than national income.
  31. T or F Intermediate government products are products on the borderline between current services and capital goods.
  32. T or F Income from illegal activities is excluded from the national income.

Given the following items:

Wages and salaries 100
Supplements to wages and salaries 3
Transfer payments (net) 4
Lend-lease shipments 10
Profits before dividends 8
Dividends 4
Interest on the national debt 2
Interest and rent 7
Business taxes 25
Income of proprietors 24
Imputed return on govt. property 1 1
Personal taxes 18
Depreciation 8
Consumers expenditures 90
Net capital formation 3
Savings bond sales 12
Subsistence to armed forces 10

33, 34, 35. _________ State amount of National Income.

36, 37, 38. _________ State amount of income payments

39, 40, 41. _________ State amount of gross national product

42, 43, 44. _________ State amount of individual savings

45, 46, 47. _________ State amount of Govt. expenditure for goods and services

48, 49, 50. _________ State amount of total government expenditures.

51, 52, 53. _________ State amount of government deficit.

  1. T or F Wealth is measured as a stock at a point in time while income is measured as a flow over a period of time.
  2. T or F Capital formation consists of all business purchases of producers goods except additions to inventory of finished consumption goods.
  3. _____ The gross national product for any year will consist of all the following items except [list all the items that are not included]—

(a) sales of single use consumer goods
(b) sales of single use producers goods
(c) change in business inventories
(d) sales of durable use consumers goods
(e) sales of durable use producers goods
(f) sales of consumers services
(g) sales of producers services

  1. T or F Omitting imputed rents from the national income results in too high an estimate of savings.
  2. T or F A gun purchased by a gangster is not included in the national product because it is for use in illegal activities.
  3. T or F Capital formation tends to fluctuate more widely over the business cycle than consumers expenditures.
  4. T or F In Kuznets’ estimates national income equals net national product.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Answer Key

  1. True;
  2. True;
  3. False;
  4. False;
  5. True;
  6. True;
  7. False;
  8. False;
  9. False;
  10. False;
  11. False;
  12. True;
  13. True;
  14. False;
  15. False;
  16. False;
  17. False;
  18. False;
  19. (b);
  20. True;
  21. False;
  22. False;
  23. False;
  24. False;
  25. True;
  26. False;
  27. False;
  28. False;
  29. False;
  30. True;
  31. False;
  32. True;

33/34/35. = 100+3+8+24+7=142;
36/37/38. = 142+4–4=142;
39/40/41. = 142+8+25=175;
42/43/44. = 142 – 18 – 90 = 34;
45/46/47. = 175–90–(3+8)  = 74;
48/49/50. =175–90–(3+8) +4 =78;
51/52/53. = 78 – 25 – 18 =35

  1. True;
  2. False;
  3. (b),(g);
  4. False;
  5. False;
  6. True;
  7. True.

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Papers of Milton Friedman, Box 76, Folder 5 “University of Chicago [sic], Econ 129”.

Image Source: Columbia University, Columbia 250 Celebrates Columbians Ahead of Their Time.

Categories
Chicago Economists Salaries

Chicago. Selected salaries. Hayek visiting, Friedman as associate professor, 1946

 

 

Since economists put much store in the notion of people putting their (own or other people’s) money where their mouths are, Economics in the Rear-view Mirror provides from time to time some historical faculty salaries to shine a little light on where those professors of economics before us stood in the willingness-to-pay of their respective departments and university administrations. In this post we see how the brief visiting professorship of Friedrich Hayek and the tenured associate professorship of Milton Friedman fit into the 1946 salary structure at the Univerity of Chicago’s department of economics.

Note: For his half-quarter service Hayek was offered $2,000 (quoted in a January 23, 1945 note  from the director of the U of Chicago Press to VP E. C. Colwell). I presume the $4,000 figure includes $2,000 compensation from (or on behalf of) Stanford University.

_______________________

Comparison: Selected 1945-46 Chicago Salaries
(and recommendations for 1946-47)

Jacob Viner. $10,000
Frank Knight. $9,000 ($10,000)
S.E. Leland. $9,000 ($9,500 Note: resigned to go to Northwestern)
T.W. Schultz. $9,000 ($9,000)
John U. Nef. $8,000 ($8,000)
Jacob Marschak. $8,000 ($8,500)
Paul H. Douglas. $7,000 ($8,000)
Oscar Lange. ($6,000) ($6,000) on leave 1 Oct 1945 to 30 June 1947
Henry Simons. $6,000 ($6,000)
L. W. Mints. $5,500 ($6,000)
Tjalling Koopmans $5250 ($6,740. Note: new salary effective 1 January 1946)

Source:  “Budget and Appointment Recommendations 1946-47 (December 7, 1945)”

_______________________

Hayek’s Half-Quarter, Spring 1946

 

May 10, 1946

Mr. Robert Redfield Social Sciences
R. G. Gustavson Central Administration

On May 9, 1946 the Board of Trustees approved the following recommendations:

It is recommended that Friedrich A. Hayek be appointed Visiting Professor of Economics in the Department of Economics for the period April 8, 1946 to May 11, 1946. For this service and a similar period of service at Stanford University it is recommended that an honorarium of $4,000 be approved.

cc:
Mr. T. W. Schultz
Mr. L. A. Kimpton)      Salary not mentioned
Mrs. K. Turabian)        Salary not mentioned

 

Board—5/9/46:

It is recommended that Friedrich a. Hayek be appointed Visiting Professor of Economics in the Department of Economics for the period April 8, 1946 to May 11, 1946. For this service and a similar period of service at Stanford University it is recommended that an honorarium of $4,000 be approved.

Form sent to Comptroller—5/13/46

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Milton Friedman’s tenured associate professorship
Effective October, 1946

March 19, 1946

Mr. Robert Redfield Social Sciences
R. G. Gustavson Vice President

On March 28, 1946 the Committee on Instruction and Research approved the following recommendation:

It is recommended that Milton Friedman be appointed Associate Professor of Economics in the Department of Economics on indefinite tenure on a 4E Service basis at an annual salary of $6,000 effective October 1, 1946.

cc:
Mr. T. W. Schultz
Mr. L. A. Kimpton)      Salary not mentioned
Mrs. K. Turabian)        Salary not mentioned

 

I & R. 28 March 1946:

It is recommended that Milton Friedman be appointed Associate Professor in the Department of Economics on indefinite tenure on a 4E service basis at an annual salary of $6,000 effective October 1, 1946.

 

Source: University of Chicago Library. Department of Special Collections. Office of the President. Hutchins Administration Records. Box 284. Folder “Economics, 1943-1947”.

Image Source: National Portrait Gallery. Photographs Collection. NPG x187289. Friedrich August von Hayek by Walter Stoneman, half-plate glass negative, June 1945. The portrait has been cropped to fit the format of this webpage.
Creative Commons License Creative Commons license. Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

Categories
Chicago History of Economics Suggested Reading

Chicago. Bibliography for History of Economic Thought. Frank Knight, 1933

 

 

Milton Friedman’s papers at the Hoover Institution Archives include the economics course notes from his student years. In an earlier post I transcribed Friedman’s own listing of his coursework in economics, statistics and mathematics by quarter/semester and academic institution. This is how we know that it was during the 1933 Winter Quarter that Milton Friedman attended Frank Knight’s course on the history of economic thought.  Friedman’s notes begin with a four page course bibliography. An image of the first page is included below. A transcription of the complete bibliography, augmented with links to almost all items, immediately follows.  

I had earlier transcribed the mimeographed course bibliography from the 1946 Winter Quarter found in Norman Kaplan’s student notes that I found in the University of Chicago archives. The 1946 course bibliography includes about twenty additional items when compared this 1933 version.

With a clear, typed bibliography to check against Friedman’s sometimes only partially legible handwritten notes, I discovered that duplication technology must have dramatically improved between 1933 and 1946 at the University of Chicago. Friedman clearly copied from a nearly identical bibliography (including Knight annotations!) that I surmise might have been only available as a single typed list posted with reserve material at the library. 

First page of Frank Knight’s bibliography for the History of Economic Thought course in Milton Friedman’s student notes at the University of Chicago, Winter Quarter 1933.

 

___________________________

Economics 302
History of Economic Thought
Frank H. Knight

Bibliography

General Works

Gray, Alexander—Development of Economic Doctrine

Haney, L.H.—History of Economic Thought

(Read both of them on classical school with care)

Ingram, J. K.—A History of Political Economy. Briefer than Haney, and usable

Spann, O. History of Economics (English Translation [of 19th German ed., 1930]) [17th ed., German original Die Hauptheorien der Volkswirtschaftslehre (1928)]

Valuable for its intense opposition to the viewpoint of the classical school, in favor of an organismic or universalistic standpoint.

Won’t make much use of:

Oncken A.—Geschichte der National Ökonomie. Very good up to Adam Smith (Knight likes)

Gide, C. and Rist, C.—History of Economic Doctrine. (Translation from French) Competent but uninspired book. (Begins with Physiocrats) (Knight does not like.)

Schumpeter, Joseph—Epochen der Dogmen- und Methodengeschichte, contained in Grundriss der Sozialökonomik, Vol. I. [English translation]

On the whole period before the classical school

Monroe, A.E.—Early Economic Thought. Lengthy excerpts from important writers

Dunning, W.A.—History of Political Theories, Ancient and Mediaeval

Dunning, W.A.—History of Political Theories, From Luther to Montesquieu

 

Greco-Roman Economics

Miss [E.] Simey—article entitled Economic Theory among the Greeks and Romans [Economic Review vol. 10 (October 1900), pp. 462-481] (On Reserve)—Best about ancient

Laistner, M.L.W.—Greek Economics, Introduction and excerpts.

 

Medieval

Ashley, W. J.—English Economic History and Theory. Volume I, Part I, Chapter 3, and Volume I, Part II, Chapter 6. Best general account.

O’Brien, George—An Essay on Medieval Economic Theory. Highly important, especially because from a Catholic point of view.

Becker Carl, The Heavenly City of the 18th Century Philosophers. Chapter 1 on the climate of opinion.

Tawney, R.H.—Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. Chapter I on the Medieval Background.

 

Physiocrats.

(Given very little attention in this course)

Ware, Norman—article on the Physiocrats in American Economic Review, 1931

Turgot, A.R.J., Formation and Distribution of Riches (Ashley Economic Classics)

 

Mercantilism

Viner, J. English Theories of Foreign Trade before Adam Smith. In Journal of Political Economy, volume 38, numbers 3 and 4. [Reprinted in Studies in the Theory of International Trade: First Part; Second Part]

Schmoller, Gustav. The Mercantile System. Invaluable, also as a specimen of the German Historical Economics.

Ashley, W. J. The Tory Origin of Free Trade. Q. J. E. Volume 11.

 

Classical School

Whitaker A. C.—Labor Theory of Value in English Political Economy. Nearly essential.

Cannan E. –Theories of Production and Distribution. Valuable, but laborious reading.

Cannan—Review of Economic Theory. Later and more available.

 

(Ought to own)

Adam Smith—Wealth of Nations. Full text, Everyman’s Library (2 volumes) most available [Volume One; Volume Two]. Abridged edition edited by Ashley gives part covered in course conveniently in one volume. Cannan Edition (2 vols.), the definitive edition, but expensive and bulky.

Ricardo, David—Principles of Political Economy. Gonnar Edition best. Available in Everyman’s.

Mill, J. S.—Principles of Political Economy. Ashley edition

 

Subjective Value or Marginal Utility School

Smart Wm.—Introduction to the Theory of Value.

Wieser, F.—Natural Value

Smart’s prefaces to Böhm-Bawerk’s two main volumes [Böhm-Bawerk Capital and Interest and Positive Theory of Capital] and to Wieser’s Natural Value.

Weinberger, Otto—Die Grenznutzenschule

Mises, Ludwig—Bemerkungen zum Grundproblem der Subjektivistischen Wertlehre, contained in Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik. Band 59, Heft 1.

 

Source: Hoover Institution Archives.  Milton Friedman Papers, Box 120. Notebook: “Economics

Image Source: Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library. University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf1-03516.

Categories
Funny Business Harvard

Harvard. ‘Twas a Night in the Sixties. Poem by Martin Feldstein, 1980

 

‘Tis the Season to be Jolly so it is time to share this 39-year old economics parody composed, and one imagines performed, by Harvard Professor, Reagan economics adviser, and long-time president of the National Bureau of Economic Research, Martin Feldstein (1939-2019).

I have inserted first or last names between square brackets for the benefit of any non-economist or young economist (Boomer says, “You’re Welcome”) that has somehow landed on this page. 

__________________

‘Twas a Night in the Sixties
by Martin Feldstein

Cambridge, Massachusetts
December 1980

‘Twas a night in the sixties
And all through the land
Unemployment was falling
Inflation at hand.

The stock market was rising,
Without any care,
In hopes a Dow thousand
Soon would be there.

The Keynesians were snuggled
Secure in their Chairs,
While visions of multipliers
Allayed all their cares.

Paul [Samuelson] with his textbook
And Art [Okun] with his gap
Had settled their brains
For a long postwar nap.

When out in the land
There arose such a clatter,
A voice that was crying
That money could matter.

Away from their desks
They flew in a flash
To see who was claiming
Such power for cash.

They looked at their models
With equations precise,
That gave semblance of proof
To conclusions so nice.

When what to their wondering
Eyes should appear
But a miniature sleigh
With eight tiny reindeer

With a little old driver
Who was having such fun
They knew in a moment
It must be Milton [Friedman]

More numerous than eagles
His supporters they came
And he whistled and shouted
And called them by name.

First John [sic, Jean-Baptiste] Say and then [David] Hume
Then [Alfred] Marshall and [John Stuart] Mill,
Now [Karl] Brunner and [Alan] Meltzer
And Anna [Schwartz] and Phil [Cagan].

From the U. of Chicago
To Minneapolis-St. Paul
Then dash away! Dash away!
Dash away all!

As economic theories with which economists play
When they meet with an obstacle
Assume it away,

So off to the journals,
Their papers they flew,
With monetarist theorems,
Rational expectations too.

And even in Cambridge
Was heard the new truth,
The theorems and lemmas
Of each little proof.

The Keynesian thinkers
Were spinning around
When onto the scene,
Milton came with a bound.

He was dressed all in gold
From his head to his foot
And his ideas were polished
And ready to put.

“Velocity’s stable,
M1 and M2,
Which shows what the Fed
Shouldn’t be trying to do.”

“That curve by Phillips
It really is straight
And the cost of funds
Is the real interest rate.”

He wrote many a word,
And with evidence too.
At the NBER
His volumes they grew.

His ideas how simple.
He puts them so well.
It would be no wonder
When he got his Nobel.

A wink of his eye
And a nod of his head
Soon gave Keynesians to know
They had something to dread.

Then turning his talents
To the writing of prose
TV and best seller
He did with wife Rose.

Then he sprang to his sleigh
To his team gave a whistle
And away they all flew
Like the down of a thistle.

But I heard him exclaim
As he drove out of sight,
“Keep freedom for all,
and keep money tight.”

Source: Ancient, analogue copy found in Irwin Collier’s personal papers.

Image Source: Faculty portrait of Martin Feldstein in 1997 in The Harvard Gazette, June 13, 2019.

Categories
Columbia Suggested Reading Syllabus

Columbia. New Seminar. Outline with readings, Economic Theory and Change. Mitchell and Ginzberg, 1937

 

Wesley Clair Mitchell left voluminous course lecture notes found with his other papers at the Columbia University Archives. On the whole his notes are very neatly written by hand so that any typed pages among his lecture notes immediately catch the attention of the tired eyes of this archival junkie working the boxes. My presumption was that this typed material was probably someone else’s work and the pencilled “Eli Ginzberg” on one of the course outlines provided an obvious lead. Ginzberg received his Ph.D. from Columbia in 1934 and held the rank of Lecturer in economics at Columbia at the time of this course. Chapter 2 (“The Education of an Economist”) in his book The Skeptical Economist (1987) provides the necessary back-story for the course materials transcribed for this post.

From Mitchell’s notes to the first session from the Winter session of the course in 1937-38, we learn that a dress rehearsal was held as a seminar during the Spring 1937 course for which we have the following list of participants. Definitely worth noting is that William Vickrey and Anna Jacobson Schwartz participated in that preliminary seminar.

____________________

Handwritten: Economics Seminar. March-May 1937
(Signatures of student participants. Note: “not complete”)

William Vickrey, Ruth Cleve [?], Pauline Arkus, Anna Jacobson [Note: this is Milton Friedman’s collaborator Anna Schwartz], [First name illegible] Louise Boggen, Konrad Bekker, Mark S. Massel, Eileen M. Conly, John I. Griffin, Alan Pope, Bela Gold, Burnham P. Beckwith, Herman Zap, Moore

Source:  Columbia University Archives. Papers of Wesley Clair Mitchell. Box 3, Folder “3-5/37 A”.

____________________

Origin of the seminar

“In 1932-1933, a group of us brought about the first change in the curriculum: We persuaded Mitchell, Clark, and Angell to offer a seminar on economic theory. In the mid-1930s, when I had begun to teach as an assistant in the School of Business, I was instrumental in establishing several further reforms, largely through persuading its dean, Roswell C. McCrea, who also served as chairman of the Economics Department, to do the following: to reduce the number of subjects on which doctoral candidates were examined from seven to six, to invite Milton Friedman to give a course on ‘Neoclassical Economics,’ to have Wesley Mitchell substitute for his lectures on ‘Current Types of Economic Theory’ a new seminar on ‘Economic Theory and Economic Change,’ in which I would serve as his assistant. Furthermore, McCrea obtained the consent of the Committee on Instruction in the School of Business for me to offer a new course on ‘Economics and Group Behavior,’ which was cross-listed in the Department of Economics’ offerings. This was probably the first course in what later became known as ‘human resources.’”

 

Source: Eli Ginzberg, The Skeptical Economist (Westview Press, 1987), p. 16.

____________________

Secular and Structural Changes in a Modern Economy
From Mitchell’s handwritten notes for the first meeting
Sept. 28, 1937

An experimental course. 1st time given, aside from a brief trial run in seminar last spring.
Title not felicitous: perhaps it will prove not very accurate. Explanation of view[?] called for.

Past 2 generations have seen vigorous development of three or four different approaches to study of economic behavior.

Economic theory of several types ranging from mathematical economics on one flank to institutional economics on other flank.

Economic history of recent and more remote past

Economic statistics have multiplied in the leading commercial nations and technique of using them has been improved.

Relation of these approaches to one another

Difficult to find investigation in which one approach only is used.

Economic theorist seldom disregards wholly the historical setting of his problem, or quantitative importance of its components. Whether they recognize it or not, these factors count in their thinking.

Economic historians and statisticians cannot dispense wholly with qualitative analysis.

Their selection and arrangement of materials imply classification: they take materials that are pertinent and pass on others that are not. What is pertinent in their judgment is decided whether they realize it or not, by the organization of their ideas.

Can find many investigations in which an attempt is made to use all three approaches

Schmoller’s Allgemeine Vokswirtschaftslehre, Webbs’ History of British T. U.‘s and Industrial Democracy.Marshall’s Industry and Trade. Cassel’s Social Economics. Keynes‘ Theory of Money, Pigou’s Industrial Fluctuations, Sombart’s Moderne Kapitalismus. A brilliant older example Marx’s Capital; indeed Wealth of Nations except that Adam Smith had a poor opinion of ‘political arithmetic’.

 

But, to a large extent, the theoretical, historical, and statistical approaches have been developed by three groups of workers

Each of whom is especially adept in one approach and makes incidental rather than systematic and thorough use of the other approaches

And there are

Economic theorists
Economic historians
Economic statisticians

who seem not to realize the extent to which their thinking is influenced by elements derived from the other approaches.

In general we cannot claim that the three approaches have been perfectly blended

Schmoller a particularly good example because he tried as hard to use all three. He knew certain phases of economic history well: but not all the phases on which he touched. He was a slovenly theorist and a gullible statistician.

Hence one of the great tasks before the generation of economists to whom members of this class belong is to utilize the knowledge of economic processes provided by the 3 approaches more effectively than their predecessors have done.

Primary aim of the course is to aid in that effort.

Method is to take up certain economic processes that have been studied for both the theoretical angles and for the historical or statistical angles or for both and to inquire whether the realistic approaches call for modification of the theoretical analyses: quite as much

Whether the theoretical approach calls for modification of the realistic investigations.

How much we can get out of this experiment for the improvement of our own investigations remains to be seen.

Will depend not only upon the industry with which we are ready to devote to study of the materials assigned but also upon the ability to think we are able to develop.

 

Mode of conducting course

Dr. G. and I will select problems, at least at beginning, and assign readings. Members of class will present reports to the class Written or oral. Discussion in class.

As work goes on we may well turn up problems of which Dr. Ginzberg and I have not thought in advance.

Interest of the meetings and value of the work are necessarily conditioned by the clarity of the reports made by the members of the group.

Please try hard to get your notes[?] well organized and lucidly presented. So well presented that other members who listen once only can understand and expect questions of others as you present reports.

So much for the general aims of the course and how it will be conducted. Begin work with an attempt to characterize broadly the conceptions of economic change that are held by investigators.

Or rather, what types of movements occur in economic life.

 

1st assignment

Let each member of class consult one or more of the statistical treatises that deal with time-series analysis to find out what types of movements are recognized.

What is basis of classification used? In what are these movements all alike? In what do the types differ? Are all of these types recognized by economic theory? For what types do economic theorists offer explanations? What relation if any do the movements of the statisticians bear to the ‘disturbing circumstances’ of economic theory and to the movements by which economic equilibrium is restored after a disturbance, and maintained in the absence of further disturbances (equilibrating movements)? Are the criteria used by economic statisticians in classifying movement like those used by time-series analysts? Can we expect inductive testing of economic laws?

Source:  Columbia University Archives. Papers of Wesley Clair Mitchell. Box 3, Folder “9/28/37 A”.

____________________

Handwritten draft of course announcement

December 19, 1936
Announced for 1936-37

Cumulative Changes in Economic Processes

A critical survey of realistic studies of population growth, natural resources, occupations, capacity to produce, standards of living, national income and its distribution, ownership of property, business organization and methods, labor conditions, capital accumulation, the role played by government in economic affairs, and national planning, accompanied by study of the relations of the findings to economic theory.

Readings, reports and class discussions. Limited to twenty students. Admission by permission of the instructor.

2 hours a week, both semesters.
4-6 Thursdays.

Source:  Columbia University Archives. Papers of Wesley Clair Mitchell. Box 3, Folder “12/19/36 A”.

____________________

Course Announcement
1937-38

Economics 201-202—Secular and structural changes in a modern economy.  3 points each session. Professor Mitchell with the assistance of Dr. Ginzberg.

Tu., 4:10-6. 102 Low.

The theoretical, institutional, historical, and statistical approaches to the study of economic changes. Critical survey of investigations into recent changes in important factors. Relations of the findings to current economic theory.
Readings, reports, and class discussions.
Admission only with permission of the instructor.

Source: Columbia University. Bulletin of Information (July 23, 1938). Courses offered by the Faculty of Political Science for the Winter and Spring Sessions, 1937-1938, p. 30.

____________________

Course Announcement
1938-39

Economics 201-202—Economic changes and economic theory.  3 points each session. Professor Mitchell assisted by Dr. Ginzberg.

Tu., 4:10-6. 502 Business.

The theoretical, institutional, historical, and statistical approaches to the study of economic changes. Critical survey of investigations into recent changes in important factors. Relations of the findings to current economic theory. Readings, reports, and class discussions.

Admission only with permission of the instructor.

Source: Columbia University. Bulletin of Information (July 23, 1938). Courses offered by the Faculty of Political Science for the Winter and Spring Sessions, 1938-1939, p. 31.

____________________

Jan. 14, 1937

TENTATIVE OUTLINE FOR COURSE ON CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN ECONOMIC PROCESSES

Introduction: The theoretical, the historical, and the statistical approaches to the study of Economic Changes.

  1. The concepts of economic ‘statics’ and economic ‘dynamics’ in the work of J. S. Mill, Marx, J. B. Clark, Alfred Marshall, Gustav Cassel.
    What ‘dynamic’ problems are treated by these writers? How far does the treatment build upon ‘static’ theory?
    Theoretical treatment of cumulative changes in institutions by Marx, Veblen and Commons.
  2. Historical accounts of economic changes.
    What ‘explanations’ are given of significant changes by such writers as Ashley, Schmoller, the Webbs, Sombart, Clapham?
  3. Time-series analysis
    Types of changes commonly recognized: seasonal variations, random perturbations, cyclical fluctuations, secular trends.
    The problem of ‘long cycles’. Kondratieff, Simiand, Kuznets, Burns.
    The problem of structural changes.
    What types of these changes have been explained theoretically?
    What relations have these explanations to economic theory at large?
    What relations exist between secular, cyclical, random, seasonal and structural changes?
  4. Relations among the three approaches
    The injunction to combine causal analysis with statistical description.
    Dangers of statistical work not guided by theoretical concepts.
    Dangers of theoretical speculation not checked by statistical observation
    Difficulties in fusing the two approaches
    Causal analysis of problems in which many variables are interrelated, and in which effects become causes in a process of cumulative change
    The theoretical uses of history.
    The historical applications of theory.
    Statistics and history.

Classification of investigations available for the study of economic changes

  1. Studies of recognized types of economic changes
    The abundant literature upon business cycles
    A few studies of seasonal variations
    A few studies of secular trends and of long cycles
    No systematic literature upon random perturbations; but many casual references in books on business cycles.
    Many studies of structural changes, particularly those produced by legislations—for example, the Independent Treasury system, tariff acts, etc. Also numberless discussions under next heading.
  2. Studies of changes in single economic factors
    A vast literature is available upon such subjects as
    Growth of population and its geographical distribution
    Developments of the arts of production: histories of industries
    Natural resources of different districts; their exploitation; problems of conservation
    Changes in business organization: rise of corporations, different forms of corporate organization, banking systems; histories of particular business enterprises, and so on.
    Organization of labor
    Shifting importance of agriculture, transportation, manufactures, trade, finance in the national economy.
    Changes in economic relations among nations:: commercial policies, international investments, shifts from debtor to creditor position.
    Changes in the system of prices: their relations to monetary laws and practices; the relative importance of competitive versus regulated prices, private versus public regulation; the degree of flexibility in prices
    Changes in standards of living
  3. Economic changes during certain periods
    Most of the books on economic history might be listed here, in so far as they do not belong under previous heading.
    Also a few studies primarily statistical in character, such as
    Recent Economic changes
    Recent Social Trends
    Social England—Booth’s survey and the recent many-volume study.
    Mills’ Economic Tendencies in the U.S.
  4. Work to be undertaken by the members of the course
    To read critically and report upon significant studies of recent economic changes.
    Avoid so far as feasible the subjects that are treated elaborately in other courses, for example money and banking, labor problems, business cycles, public utilities.
    Stress the effort to grasp the inter-relations among the changes studied.
    In each case consider in how far the changes are or can be ‘explained’, and what relation these explanations have or should have to economic ‘theory’.

Among the books to be consider for assignment the following are possibilities:

W. S. Thompson and P. K. Whelfton, Population Trends in the U.S. N.Y. 1933
R. D. McKenzie, The Metropolitan Community, N.Y., 1933
Carter Goodrich and others, Migration and Economic Opportunity, Philadelphia, 1936
Wyand, Economics of Consumption, N.Y., 1937
C. C. Chapman, Development of American Business and Banking Thought, 1913-1936. New York, 1937
Twentieth Century Fund, Big Business: Its Growth and its Place. N.Y., 1937
A. A. Berle and G. C. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, N.Y., 1932
A. R. Burns, The Decline of Competition, N.Y., 1936
R. C. Epstein, Industrial Profits in the U.S., N.Y., 1934
Harry Jerome, Mechanization in Industry, N.Y., 1934
F. C. Mills, Prices in Recession and Recovery, N.Y., 1936
‘The Brookings Study’, Washington, 1934 and 1935

America’s Capacity to Produce
America’s Capacity to Consume
The Formation of Capital
Income and Economic Progress

H. G. Moulton and Associates, The American Transportation Problem, Washington, 1933
National Resources Board, Report December 1, 1934, Washington 1934.
W. I. King, The National Income and Its Purchasing Power, N.Y., 1930
(S. Kuznets), National Income, 1929-32, Washington, 1934
Our Natural Resources and their Conservation, A symposium edited by A. E. Parkins and J.R. Whitaker. N.Y., John Wiley & Sons, 1936
A. F. Burns, Production Trends in the U.S. Since 1870. N.Y. 1934. See review by F. A. Fetter JPE Feb. 1937
W. Sombart, Hochkapitalismus
W. H. Lough, High-Level Consumption, N.Y., 1935
W. V. Bingham. Aptitudes and Aptitude Testing, N.Y., 1937.

Source:  Columbia University Archives. Papers of Wesley Clair Mitchell. Box 3, Folder “1/14/37 A”.

____________________

[Handwritten note at top of page: “Eli Ginzberg Jan 18 1937”]

CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN A MODERN ECONOMY

Introduction

  1. The Method of the Classicists

Ricardo—Chapter I ff.
Marshall—Book V

Supplementary:

Knight—Introduction to Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit—2d ed.
Ibid—The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays
Robbins—Nature and Significance of Economic Science
Clark, J. M. Preface to Social Economics (the essay on “Statics and Dynamics”)
Moore, H.L.—
Hotelling, H.—

  1. Historical-Statistical Approach

(a) Case study of: Industrial Revolution

Toynbee
Hammonds
Webbs
Lipson
Clapham

Supplementary: see

Mantoux—
Nef—in Economic History Review.
Reconstructions, in Economic History Review

(b) Case study of: Profits and Wages in the United States

    1. Profits

Epstein
Patten
Mills

Supplementary:

Knight—Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences—article on Profits
Knight—Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences—article on Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit
Reports of the S.E.C.
Senate Committee on Foreign Bonds

    1. Wages

Douglas—Recent Economic Changes
Wolman, L.—R.E.C. and 3 Bulletins Bureau of Labor Statistics

Supplementary:

Douglas—Theory of Wages
Beveridge—Unemployment
Clay, H.—Essays in Industrial Relations

  1. Institutional-Theoretical

Marx—Communist Manifesto
Ibid.—Capital—vol. I
Veblen—Theory of Business Enterprise
Mitchell—Business Cycles
Clark, J.M.—Economics of Overhead Costs

Supplementary:

Souter-Prolegomena to Relativity Economics
Hamilton—Encyclopedia of the Social sciences Article on “Competition”
Knight—Ethics of Competition, etc.
Clark, J. M.—Preface to Social Economics
American Economic Association—Round Tables

  1. Conclusion: Methodology

Cohen—Reason and Nature
Weber, Max—Wissenschaftslehre
Whitehead—Adventure in Ideas
Simkhovitch—Approaches
Sombart—Drei Nationalökomien
Carnap—Unity of Science
MacIver—Harvard Lecture

 

PART I—Cumulative Changes in Economic Institutions

(General aim to study changes in degree and kind in the institutional setting explicit and implicit in neo-classicists; to gauge interrelations in these changes).

  1. The Large Corporation

Berle and Means—The Modern Corporation
Twentieth Century Fund: Big Business
A. R. Burns—Decline of Competition

Supplementary:

Commons—Legal Foundations of Capitalism
Holmes, O. W.—Representative Opinion
Brandeis, L.—Social and Economic Views
Hamilton, W.—Industries affected with the Public Interest
Clark, J. M.—Social Control of Business
Handler—Trade Regulation

  1. The Credit System

Annual Reports of Federal Reserve Board
Moulton—The Formation of Capital
Brookings—The Recovery of Business
Hardy—Credit Policies of the F. R. S.
Keynes—The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money.
Angell—The Behavior of Money
Reports of Senate Sub-committee on Banking
Reports of Senate Committee on S. E. C.
Reports of Senate Committee on Foreign Bonds
Clark, J. M.—Economic of Planning Public Works
Chapman, C. C.—American Business and Banking Thought
Currie, L.—The Supply of Money

Supplementary:

Articles in Economic Journal, Q.J.E., S.[sic, J.?] of P. E.

  1. The Problem of Consumption

(a) Numbers

Thompson and Whelfton—Population Trend
McKenzie—Metropolitan Community
Goodrich—Migration and Economic Opportunity
Recent Social Trends

(b) Psychology

Veblen—The Theory of the Leisure Class
Hearings on Pure Foods Drug Act
Reports of Federal Trade Commission
Bulletins of Consumers Research
Schlink—
Chase, Stuart—

(c) Economics

Brookings—America’s Capacity to Consumer
Brookings—Income and Economic Progress
Wyand—Economics of Consumption
Recent Social Trends
Seligman—Installment Selling
Keynes—Appendix to General Theory

 

PART II—Cumulative Changes in the Short-Run

(Contrast with equilibrium approach of neo-classicists).

Case Study: Post-War Expansion

  1. The automobile: building and new industries

(a) Source of capital
(b) Entrepreneurs’ expectations
(c) Exploitation of demand

  1. Secondary Results: Structural Changes

(a) Relocation of Industry
(b) Urbanization—suburbs
(c) Standard of living—mores—instalment credit
(d) Incidence of Transportation
(e) Complex of Industry—of steel, glass, gasoline

Literature

Recent Economic Changes
Recent Social Trends
Goodrich et al—
Epstein, R.—Automobile Industry
Facts and Figures—Automobile Industry-1919 ff.
Clark, J. M.—Strategic Factors in Business Cycles
Warburton, C.—In Mitchell volume
Moulton et al—The American Transportation Problem
National Resources Board—Report 12/1/34
Burns, A. F.—Production Trends
Trade Journals—Steel, distribution, etc.
Annalist

PART III: The Interrelations of Economic Institutions and Market Phenomena

How do the existing legal, banking, and distributive institutions help to condition—and how are they conditioned by the following?

1. Capital accumulation
2. Profitability of industry
3. National income—wages—agriculture
4. Behavior of prices and costs

Literature

Mills—Economic Tendencies
Mills—Prices in Recession and Recovery
King—National Income and its Purchasing Power
Kuznets, S.—National Income. 1929-32
Mitchell—Business Cycles
Clark, J. M.—Strategic Factors in Business Cycles
Keynes, J. M.—General Theory of Employment
Brookings—Recovery of Business
Brookings—N. R. A.

 

Source:  Columbia University Archives. Papers of Wesley Clair Mitchell. Box 3, Folder “1/18/37 A”.

____________________

OUTLINE
Secular and Structural Changes in a Modern Economy

[Handwritten: Eli Ginzberg]

February 23, 1937

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

OUTLINE
Secular and Structural Changes in a Modern Economy.

INTRODUCTION: The theoretical, the historical, the institutional, and the statistical approaches to the study of economic changes.

  1. “Statics and Dynamics” in the works of:
    J. S. Mill, J. B. Clark, Alfred Marshall, Gustav Cassel.
  2. “Explanation” of economic changes by:
    Ashley, Schmoller, Webbs, Sombart, Clapham
  3. Cumulative changes in institutions:
    Marx, Veblen, Commons.
  4. Time-Series Analysis: seasonal variations, cyclical fluctuations, secular trends and random perturbations. “Long cycles”:
    Kondratieff, Simiand, Kuznets, Burns.

Summary: The limitations of isolated techniques and the difficulties of fusion

  1. Theory and statistics; history and theory; statistics and theory
  2. Multiple variables in a process of cumulative change.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

Secular changes in the industrial unit, the financial system, the organization of labor, and the ideology of the public during the periods:

1870-1890
1890-1914
1914-1937

 

  1. The Industrial Unit: The changing pattern of competition
    1. Economic aspects
      1. Adjustment to technology and to a national market
      2. Location of plant and transportation
      3. Integration: to raw materials; to distribution; to finance
    2. Law and Social Control
      1. Trademarks and Patents
      2. Governmental Regulation: License, taxes, etc.
      3. Trade Associations
      4. Management vs. Ownership

*Emphasis to be placed upon changing relative positions of the industrial unit to the total economy; upon the influence of size to competitive behavior; upon economic implications of individual vs. corporate forms.

  1. Financial System—The rôle of money in a modern economy.
    1. The Changing Structure of Banking
      1. Loans and investments
      2. Active money
    2. The Problems of Debt and Liquidity
      1. Private vs. Public Debt
      2. Collateral for private debt
      3. Insurance—private and public
    3. Implications: Economic and Social
      1. Economic: The interrelations of interest rates, savings, and the formation of capital.
      2. Social: The political control over the creation of money and the use of this control for the eradication of the business cycle.
  1. Labor: not solely a commodity
    1. Unionization
      1. Members
      2. Objectives
      3. Potential threats and consequences
    2. Supply
      1. Changes in requirements of skill
      2. The relative shrinkage in agriculture
      3. The additions from women of the middle class
      4. Mobility
    3. Rôle of the Government
      1. Free Services
      2. Enforcement of minimum standards
      3. Relief payments and work creation
      4. Re Bargaining between Labor and Capital

*Emphasis: Implication of these changes for

    1. Rate of wages
    2. Total wages—cf. monopoly analysis
    3. Class-struggle analysis
  1. The Changing Ideology: The influence of money making upon the attitudes of people—
    Upon their behavior in

    1. Spending: price vs. quality; advertising; women as buyers
    2. Accumulating: liquid vs. fixed assets; speculation; insurance; goods vs. family
    3. Playing: The esoteric vs. the stable; Wanderlust; the shift from church and home to club and movie.
    4. Occupational adjustment: sensitivity to monetary stimuli; civil service; money and the arts.

Conclusions: An approach to isolating and treating the strategi9c factors in a dynamic economy—

    1. The emergence of profitability
    2. The cumulative process and the breakdown
    3. The absorption of technological developments and the tendency towards retardation of growth.
    4. The closely allied patterns of change; their interaction with the economic. 1. Political/2. Legal/3. Ideological

 

Source:  Columbia University Archives. Papers of Wesley Clair Mitchell. Box 3, Folder “2/23/37 A”.

____________________

[Pencil: “April 1937”]

SECULAR AND STRUCTURAL CHANGES
IN A
MODERN ECONOMY

OUTLINE

    1. The Study of Economic Change
    2. Population
    3. Migration and Location
    4. The Business Unit
    5. Psychology and Social Classes
    6. Technology
    7. The Legal Framework
    8. Government
    9. Dynamics of the Market
    10. Cumulative Factors

 

I

THE STUDY OF ECONOMIC CHANGE

  1. Introduction
  2. The Classicists and the Institutionalists

*Preface to First and 8th editions of Marshall’s Principles and Bk. V—Chapter XV
*Marx—Communist Manifesto—Part I

    1. The Classicists

J. S. Mill—Principles of Political Economy—Bk IV
J. B. Clark—Essentials of Economic Theory—Preface, Chapters XII, XIII, XIV, XV, and XXX
Marshall—Principles—Bk I—Chap. III; Bk V—Chaps. I, II, III, V, and XV
Cassel—Social Economy—Bk I, Chaps. I #5,6; Bk. IV

    1. The Institutionalists

Marx—Communist Manifesto—Part I
Veblen—Business Enterprise—Chpas. II, VII, IX, X
Commons—Legal Foundations of Capitalism—Chapters I, II, III, VII, IX, vi

  1. The Historians and the Statisticians

*Heckscher, Eli—“Aspects of Economic History” in Essays in Honor of Gustav Cassel
*Mitchell—“Business Cycles”—Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences

    1. The Historians

Webbs—History of Trade Unionism—Chapters II, III
Clapham—Economic History of Modern Britain—Vol I, Chapter XIV
Sombart—Der Moderne Kapitalismus—Vol. III, Part I—Chapters 22-25

    1. The Statisticians

Simiand—La Crise Mondiale—pages 1-14; pages 114-35
Burns, A. F.—Production Trends—Foreword; Chapters III;ii, iii; IV: iv; V:v, vi.
Mitchell—“Business Cycles”—Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences
Kuznets—Seasonal Variations in Industry and Trade—Chapter I, Concluding Notes—pp. 355 ff.

  1. Theory, History, and Statistics
    *J. M. Clark—“Statics and Dynamics” in Preface to Social Economy
    *F. H. Knight—New Introduction to Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit
    *W. C. Mitchell—“Quantitative Measurement” in Backward Art of Spending Money and Other Essays
    1. Cohen and Nagel—Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method Bk II: Chaps. X, XI, XVI, XVII, XIX sec. 3
    2. Robbins—Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Chapters II 4,5; III 4,5; IV; VI 5,6
    3. J. M. Clark—“Socializing Theoretical Economics” in Preface to Social Economics

 

II

POPULATION

  1. The Data, Method, and Deductions about population in economic theory
    *Malthus—Population—Chapters I, II
    *Marshall—Bk IV, Chapters IV, V

    1. Ricardo—Principles II, V, XXXII
    2. J. S. Mill—Principles—Chapter X, 2, 3
    3. Pigou—Economics of Welfare—Part I, chapters IX, X
  2. The Contemporary Data, Methods, Deductions as to Trends
    *“Population”—Encyclopedia of Social Sciences

    1. Thompson and Whelpton—Population Trends in U. S.—Chapters I: pp. 2267;257-61;288-91; IX, X, and XI
    2. Carr-Saunders—World Population (1936)—Chapters I, II, XVI, XVII, XXII, Note on Overpopulation
    3. Kucyznski—Births and Death, Vol I. Chaps. I, II, III, IV; II. Chaps. I, VI
  3. The Economic Implications of the Population Problem
    *Myrdal—“Industrialization and Population” in Essays in Honor of Gustav Cassel

    1. On Unemployment
      Beveridge—Unemployment—Chapter XVII
    2. On Imperialism
      W. S. Thompson—Danger Spots in World Politics—Chapters X, XII, XIII, XIV
    3. On Consumption
      Lynd—Middletown—Chapters V, XI
      J. M. Keynes. Economic Consequences of a Declining Population. Eugenics Review, April 1937, vol. XXIX, 13-17.

 

III

MIGRATION AND LOCATION OF PEOPLE AND INDUSTRY

*Marshall—Principles—pp. 199-203, Book IV—Chapter X, Appendix A-#13
*Weber, A.—Theory of Location of Industries

Editor’s Introduction
Author’s Introduction
Chapters I, VII

*Semple—American History, its Geographic Conditions—Chapters XV, XVI, XVII

    1. Goodrich—Migration and Economic Opportunity—Introduction: Chapters I, VI, VII, IX, XII
    2. Mackenzie—The Metropolitan Community—Chapters I, III, V, VI, XII, XVII, XXIII

 

IV

THE BUSINESS UNIT

*Marshall—Principles—Bk IV—Chapter XII
*Twentieth Century Fund—Big Business—Summary

    1. Distribution of the Working Population

The National Income in the United States (1929-35). Department of Commerce

    1. The Problem of Control: Private

Berle and Means—Modern Corporation and Private Property, Bks I, VI
Twentieth Century Fund—Big Business Summary, Chaps. I, VIII
Laidler—Concentration of Control in American Industry, Parts I, VI.

    1. The Problem of Control: Public

Jones and Bingham—Principles of Public Utilities—Chapters I, II, and XII
Moulton Associates—American Transportation Problem—Report of Committee—Chapters I, II, XII, XXI, XXIV, XXV, XXX, XXXI

    1. Planning

Parkins and Whitaker—Our Natural Resources and their Concentration—Chapters I, II, IX, X, XI, XVI, XVIII
National Resources Board—1934—Part I—Sec. I, Sec. V.

 

V

PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL CLASSES

*Marshall—Principles—Bk I—Chapter II
*Weber—General Economic History—Chapter XXX

    1. The Spirit of the Capitalist

M. Weber—The Protestant Ethic—Foreword, Introduction, Chapters II, III, V

    1. Modern Psychology and Aggression

Abrahams, K.—Selected Essays on Psycho-Analysis—Chapters XXIII, XXIV, XXV
Horney, K.—The Neurotic Personality of Our Times—Chapters [blank]
Mead, M.—Competition and Cooperation in Primitive Societies. Interpretive Statement.

    1. The American Scene

Veblen—Absentee Ownership—chapters VI, VII I, ii, iii
Parker—The Casual Laborer and Other Essays—Recent Social Trends—Chapter VIII
Taussig and Joslyn—American Business Leaders—Chapters X, XI, XVI, XVII, XIX, XX

 

VI

TECHNOLOGY

*Marshall—Principles—Bk IV—Chapter IX
*Veblen—Theory of Business Enterprise—Chapter IX

    1. America’s Capacity to Produce—Introduction, Chapters VI, XIV, XV, XVI, XIX, XX

Jerome—Mechanization in Industry—Introduction, Summary, Chapters III, IV

    1. –Recent Social Trends—Volume I—Chapter III

Weintraub and Posner—Technological Tendencies and their Social Implications
Jerome—Mechanization—Chapters IX, X

 

VII

THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK

*J. S. Mill—Principles of Political Economy—Bk II—Chapter II
*Veblen—Theory of Business Enterprise—Chapter VIII

    1. Commons—Legal Foundations of Capitalism. Chaps. I, II, III, VII, IX
    2. Handler—Trade Regulation, Chapters I, II
    3. Bonbright—The Valuation of Property—Chapters I, II, III, IV, V, XXX, XXXII

 

VIII

THE GOVERNMENT

*J. S. Mill—Principles of Political Economy—Bk V—Chapter XI
*H. Laski—The State—Chapter IV

    1. Re Taxes

Shoup—Facing the Tax Burden—Chaps 2, 3, 6, 7, 8
Recent Social Trends—Volume II—Chapters XXV, XXVI

    1. Re Banking

Willis—Central Banking—Part I, Chapters XVI, XVII, XVIII, XXVI
Hardy—Credit Policies of the Federal Reserve System—Part I

    1. Re Labor

Commons and Associates—History of Labor in the U.S.

Volume III, Section I, Chapters XI, XII, Labor legislation
Volume IV, Chapters I, II, XVI, XXXII, XXXVIII, XLIV, XLV

Epstein—Insecurity—Parts I, X, XI

 

IX

DYNAMICS OF THE MARKET

*Marshall—Principles—Book V
*J. M. Clark—Economics of Overhead Costs—Chapters XXIII, XXIV

    1. Production: 1922-36

Mills—Economic Tendencies—Chapters VI, X

    1. Prices: 1922-36

Mills—Economic Tendencies—Chapter VII
Prices in Recession and Recovery—Chapters I, III, V, VI, IX

    1. Wages: 1922-36

Douglas—Real Wages in the United States—Chapters XXII, XXVI, XXX, XXXI
Recent Economic Changes—Volume II—Chapter VI
Wolman—N.B.E.R. Bulletins #46, 54, 63

    1. Profits: 1922-36

Epstein—Industrial Profits in the United States—Introduction, Book I, Book IV

    1. Money: 1922-36

Currie—The Supply and Control of Money in the United States—Chapter III
Fed. Res. Board—Annual Reports. 1934, 1935, 1936

 

X

CUMULATIVE FACTORS

*Marshall—Principles—Book VI—Chapters XI, XII, XIII
*J. M. Clark—Strategic Factors in Business Cycles—Parts I and VI

    1. The War, Changing Attitudes, and the Economy
    2. The Automobile and the Economy
    3. The Creation and Destruction of Bank Deposits and the Economy

Source:  Columbia University Archives. Papers of Wesley Clair Mitchell. Box 3, Folder “4/?/37 A”.

Image Source: From the cover of Eli Ginzberg’s book The Eye of Illusion (Transactions Publishers, 1993).

 

 

Categories
Chicago Funny Business

Chicago. A Mikado parody number. Probably 1949.

 

Among the papers of Alfred Rees at the Economists’ Papers Archive at Duke and of Milton Friedman at the Hoover Institution Archives, one finds stapled copies of a skit written by graduate students at the University of Chicago with the title “Alice in Stationary State”. The cover page includes a list of 18 contributors to the skit either as librettist and/or as a performing member of the cast/chorus. Carl Christ who was to leave Chicago and join the faculty of the Department of Political Economy at Johns Hopkins University in 1950 was named as a member of the cast/chorus. The mimeographed manuscript bears no date, but in Christ’s paper “The Cowles Commission’s Contributions to Econometrics at the University of Chicago, 1939-1955 (Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXII, March 1994, pp. 30-59) two songs from the manuscript are quoted by Christ, one to the tune of “The American Patrol“. Since he dates the skit to about 1949 and we know his whereabouts for 1950, I think it is safe to trust his memory as to the 1949 date he mentions. Note the slight discrepancies with presumably a later, recycled version of the lyrics.

Other parodies of Gilbert and Sullivan that have been transcribed for Economics in the Rear-View Mirror include:  “When I was a Lad“, “The Major General’s Song” and “I’m Called Little Buttercup” . Non-Gilbert-Sullivan material  transcribed from the skit are the Song for an Entrepreneur (to the tune of “Jingle Bells”) and “First Epistle unto the entering students” .

Here is a link to a YouTube clip from the Mikado for those of us whose familiarity with Gilbert and Sullivan lyrics is not quite up to mid-20th century Chicago levels.

_____________________

DECONTROL SONG
(to the tune of “My Object all Sublime from Patience (sic*))

*Actually from Gilbert and Sullivan’s Mikado.

A more humane economist never
Did in Chicago exist;
To nobody second,
He’s certainly reckoned,
A true philanthropist.
‘Tis his most human endeavor
To make to some extent
Each individual
Tenant pay the
Equilibrium rent.
A more humane Mikado never
Did in Japan exist,
To nobody second,
I’m certainly reckoned
A true philanthropist.
It is my very humane endeavor
To make, to some extent,
Each evil liver
A running river
Of harmless merriment.
CHORUS:

His object all sublime
He might achieve in time,
Convict the planners of their crime,
The planners of their crime.
Make those of Leftist bent
Unwillingly represent
A source of innocent merriment, of innocent merriment.

CHORUS:

My object all sublime
I shall achieve in time —
To let the punishment fit the crime —
The punishment fit the crime;
And make each prisoner pent
Unwillingly represent
A source of innocent merriment!
Of innocent merriment!

The addle-pated
Who aggregate the unrelated data
And find instead of
The alpha they seek
A beta even greater.
The Keynesians and all their ilk
Who seek to find
Nirvana…He’ll fix them all,
He’ll fix them all,
He’ll ship them to Urbana!
All prosy dull society sinners,
Who chatter and bleat and bore,
Are sent to hear sermons
From mystical Germans
Who preach from ten till four.
The amateur tenor, whose vocal villainies
All desire to shirk,
Shall, during off-hours,
Exhibit his powers
To Madame Tussaud’s waxwork.
CHORUS:

His object all sublime
He might achieve in time,
Convict the planners of their crime,
The planners of their crime.
Make those of Leftist bent
Unwillingly represent
A source of innocent merriment, of innocent merriment.

CHORUS:

My object all sublime
I shall achieve in time —
To let the punishment fit the crime —
The punishment fit the crime;
And make each prisoner pent
Unwillingly represent
A source of innocent merriment!
Of innocent merriment!

Source: Duke University. David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Economists’ Papers Archive. Albert Rees Papers, Box 1, Folder “Personal”. Identical copy also found at The Hoover Institution Archives, Milton Friedman Papers, Box 79, Folder 6 “University of Chicago Miscellaneous.”

_____________________

Second, revised version

MEMBER OF THE FACULTY:
(to the tune of “My object all sublime” from the MIKADO)

A more humane economist never
In Chicago did exist;
To nobody second,
I’m certainly reckoned,
A true philanthropist.
It is my most human endeavor
To make to some extent
Each individual
Tenant pay the
Equilibrium rent.
A more humane Mikado never
Did in Japan exist,
To nobody second,
I’m certainly reckoned
A true philanthropist.
It is my very humane endeavor
To make, to some extent,
Each evil liver
A running river
Of harmless merriment.
My object all sublime
I might achieve in time,
Convince the planners of their crime,
The planners of their crime.
Make those of Leftist bent
Unwillingly represent
A source of innocent merriment
Of innocent merriment.
My object all sublime
I shall achieve in time —
To let the punishment fit the crime —
The punishment fit the crime;
And make each prisoner pent
Unwillingly represent
A source of innocent merriment!
Of innocent merriment!
The addle-pated
Who aggregated unrelated data
And found instead of
The alpha they sought
A beta even greata.
The Keynesians and all their ilk
Who seek to find
Nirvana…I’ll fix them all,
I’ll fix them all,
I’ll ship them to Urbana!
All prosy dull society sinners,
Who chatter and bleat and bore,
Are sent to hear sermons
From mystical Germans
Who preach from ten till four.
The amateur tenor, whose vocal villainies
All desire to shirk,
Shall, during off-hours,
Exhibit his powers
To Madame Tussaud’s waxwork.

Source: The Hoover Institution Archives. Milton Friedman Papers, Box 79, Folder 6 “University of Chicago Miscellaneous.”

Categories
Chicago Exam Questions

Chicago. Money, Prelim Exam for Banking and Monetary Policy, 1959

 

Preliminary examinations at the University of Chicago for Money, Banking and Monetary Policy from the Summer Quarter, 1956 and Winter Quarter, 1969 have been posted earlier.

On August 4, 1959 a three-hour “Core Examination” was taken by seventeen students and a four-hour “Money Prelim” was taken by nine students. Two additional questions were added to the “Money Prelim”.

_______________

Summer Quarter 1959 Examination Committee for Money, Banking and Monetary Policy:

Milton Friedman (chairman)
Earl J. Hamilton
Reuben A. Kessel

_______________

Reuben A. Kessel, obituary
New York Times, 21 June 1975.

Dr. Reuben A. Kessel, professor of economics at the University of Chicago’s Graduate School of Business since 1962, died yesterday at a hospital in Chicago, after having suffered a stroke a week ago. He was 52 years old and lived in Floss moor, Ill.

Dr. Kessel earlier taught at the University of Missouri and the University of California at Los Angeles. From 1952 to 1956 he was an economist with the Rand Corporation. He later served as research associate with the National Bureau of Economic Research here. He joined the Chicago faculty in 1957.

He was the author of “Cyclical Behavior of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.”

He received an M.B.A. degree in 1948 and a doctorate in 1954, both from Chicago.

Surviving are his widow, a daughter and two brothers.

_______________

CORE EXAMINATION
MONEY, BANKING AND MONETARY POLICY

Preliminary Examination for the Ph.D. and A.M. Degrees
Summer Quarter 1959
[August 4]

WRITE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON YOUR EXAMINATION PAPER

Your Code Number and NOT your name
Name of Examination
Date of Examination

Results of the examination will be sent to you by letter.

Answer all questions. Time 3 hours.

  1. Answer both a and b.
    1. During the calendar year 1958 the United States “lost” over $2 billion of gold.
      1. Explain precisely what this statement means.
      2. What factors might account for the loss?
      3. What monetary or other effects does the loss have?
    2. It has been urged that to stem further losses, the U.S. should raise the price of gold from its present official level of $35 an ounce to a higher level.
      Discuss the consequences of such a move if

      1. other major countries raise the price of gold in proportion or
      2. they do not.
  2. Comment on both a and b.
    1. “Banks like to lend money. It’s their bread and butter. But sometimes loans have to be turned down. Remember, bankers are not lending their own money. Bank loans are made from money entrusted to banks by depositors.” (Business in Brief, Chase Manhattan Bank, No. 13, Oct. 1956, p. 8).
    2. “Treasury financing in 1954 was carried out with short- and intermediate-term securities, many of which were bought by commercial banks and served to increase the money supply.” Economic Report of the President, 1956.
  3. Consider a closed economy which has a fiduciary currency fixed in nominal amount. In this economy, a tax on earnings is replaced by a tax of equal yield on real property. Trace the consequences to be expected for income, interest rates, and the level of prices.
  4. Suppose all wages are escalated, in the sense of being linked continuously to a price index. It would be argued by many that government could not under such circumstances acquire real resources by issuing fiat currency. Do you agree? Justify your answer.

_______________

MONEY, BANKING AND MONETARY POLICY

Preliminary Examination for the Ph.D. and A.M. Degrees
Summer Quarter 1959
[August 4]

WRITE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON YOUR EXAMINATION PAPER

Your Code Number and NOT your name
Name of Examination
Date of Examination

Results of the examination will be sent to you by letter.

Answer all questions. Time: four hours.

  1. Answer both a and b.
    1. During the calendar year 1958 the United States “lost” over $2 billion of gold.
      1. Explain precisely what this statement means.
      2. What factors might account for the loss?
      3. What monetary or other effects does the loss have?
    2. It has been urged that to stem further losses, the U.S. should raise the price of gold from its present official level of $35 an ounce to a higher level.
      Discuss the consequences of such a move if

      1. other major countries raise the price of gold in proportion or
      2. they do not.
  2. Answer either a or b.
      1. Sir John Clapham has asserted (The Bank of England, Vol. II, p. 421) that it was in the Bank of England that “the practice of central banking had originally been worked out.” To what extent do you agree?
      2. Explain and criticize what you consider the most important contribution to monetary thought before 1900.
  3. Analyze, in terms of the income-expenditure approach, the effect of a reduction in the stock of money via (a) an open market sale by the Federal Reserve, (b) a surplus in the budget used to reduce the stock of money. Indicate the empirical magnitudes that must be known to predict the quantitative effect in each case.
  4. Comment on both a and b.
    1. “Banks like to lend money. It’s their bread and butter. But sometimes loans have to be turned down. Remember, bankers are not lending their own money. Bank loans are made from money entrusted to banks by depositors.” (Business in Brief, Chase Manhattan Bank, No. 13, Oct. 1956, p. 8).
    2. “Treasury financing in 1954 was carried out with short- and intermediate-term securities, many of which were bought by commercial banks and served to increase the money supply.” Economic Report of the President, 1956.
  5. Consider a closed economy which has a fiduciary currency fixed in nominal amount. In this economy, a tax on earnings is replaced by a tax of equal yield on real property. Trace the consequences to be expected for income, interest rates, and the level of prices.
  6. Suppose all wages are escalated, in the sense of being linked continuously to a price index. It would be argued by many that government could not under such circumstances acquire real resources by issuing fiat currency. Do you agree? Justify your answer.

Source: Hoover Institution Archives. Papers of Milton Friedman, Box 77, Folder 8 “University of Chicago, Econ 331”.

Image Source: Irwin Collier taking a break from archival work at the Hoover Institution.

Categories
Chicago Economist Market Economists Harvard Radical

Harvard/Chicago. Gottfried Haberler and Milton Friedman on Samuel Bowles, 1970

 

The following exchange between Gottfried Haberler and Milton Friedman is really quite remarkable. It is the second observation by Economics in the Rear-view Mirror of Gottfried Haberler trashing a liberal/radical economist on the q.t. The first instance involved John Kenneth Galbraith in 1948 (though I cannot say that I would personally fault Haberler for his having ranked Paul Samuelson above John Kenneth Galbraith as an economist). It will come as a surprise to some people that Milton Friedman defended the scholarly honor of one of the leading, if not the leading, radical economists in 1970. As we see below Friedman in no uncertain terms let Haberler know that he still considered his earlier support of Samuel Bowles for an untenured appointment at the University of Chicago to have been based solely on the analytical merits displayed by Bowles. 

You do not want to miss the Harvard anecdote relayed by Roy Weintraub that is posted below as a comment!

__________________

PERSONAL

May 14, 1970

Professor Milton Friedman
Department of Economics
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois 60637

Dear Milton:

I was told that Chicago has made an offer to Sam Bowles and that you supported it warmly. Frankly, I am somewhat surprised. He has certainly some analytic abilities but in general he is very radical, almost as wild as Arthur MacEwan, and thoroughly demagogic in his interventions in faculty meetings and talks to students. I would really like to know whether it is true that Chicago offered him a job.

Sincerely yours,

Gottfried Haberler

H:w

__________________

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS
1126 EAST 59THSTREET
CHICAGO—ILLINOIS 60637

May 19, 1970

Professor Gottfried Haberler
Department of Economics
Harvard University
326 Littauer Center
Cambridge, Masachusetts 02138

Dear Gottfried:

Some years back I had occasion to read some of the work which Bowles had done in connection with our consideration of him at that time. I was very favorably impressed indeed by the intellectual quality of the work and the command that it displayed of analytical economics. At that time I was very much in accord with our decision to make him an offer of a position. He turned us down to stay at Harvard.

I have very vague recollections about what has happened this year. I do not know for certain whether or not we did make an offer to him this year. We may have done so; and if so, I would not have objected since the only consideration I would have considered relevant would have been his intellectual qualities.

I will try to find out more definitely and let you know.

Sincerely yours,
[signed, “Milton”]
Milton Friedman

ah

[Handwritten addition: P.S. I have checked. No offer was made to him this year. We made an offer some years ago at the Ass’t Prof level when he first went to Harvard. We made a later offer a couple of years ago again on a term basis. There is no offer outstanding now.]

Source:  Hoover Institution Archives. Gottfried Haberler Papers. Box 12, Folder “GH—Milton Friedman”.

Image Source: University of Massachusetts Amherst . Police Department, “Board of Trustees fee increase demonstration: Economics professor Samuel Bowles speaking to protesters, April 15, 1976“, University Photograph Collection (RG 110-176). Special Collections and University Archives, University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries.

Categories
Chicago Exam Questions Problem Sets

Chicago. Price Theory, Part II. Friedman, Spring 1951

 

Milton Friedman’s price theory reading assignments, problem sets, and final exams from his courses Economics 300A and 300B taught during the academic year 1951-52 at the University of Chicago were transcribed in an earlier post. During the previous academic year, W. Allen Wallis and Lloyd A. Metzler taught the first quarter course, Economics 300A.  Milton Friedman and Lloyd A. Metzler taught the second quarter course, Economics 300B. Problem set and final exam for Friedman’s section have been transcribed for this post.

________________

ECONOMICS 300B
Problems for Reading Period
Spring, 1951

  1. “Productivity” is a catch-word in most general discussions of wage policy, as for example in the following quotation:

“General increases in wage rates exceeding the average growth of productivity raise costs and will ordinarily result in high prices,” from which it is implied that wage rates “ought” to rise by the same percentage as “productivity”. Sometimes, this argument is carried over to particular industries or occupation; and sometimes, the conclusion is drawn that wages “cannot” “on the average” rise by more than “productivity”.

Discuss from the point of view of price theory, with special reference to the meaning of the concepts used and the validity of the inferences drawn. Do not get involved in business cycle, or income and employment theory.

  1. Consider a hypothetical society in which there is no investment, either net or gross. All capital is completely permanent, not subject to change in form but capable of being used for different purposes. There is no selling or buying of capital goods: whoever owns the capital goods is forced by the laws or conventions of society to hold them and is permitted only to read them out (i.e., all capital is subject to the conventions that now govern human capital). Lending or borrowing is prohibited, so that there is no market rate of interest that matters, and all saving takes the form of hoarding of cash. The total amount of money in society is fixed in nominal units (say dollars).
    1. Although this economy is stationary in the aggregate, it is not static. Explain the meaning of the sentence and its bearing on the willingness of people to hold money.
    2. Wages are initially rigid (by law or otherwise) and the society is in the state of Keynesian unemployment equilibrium. Explain. What is it that assures that the aggregate amount actually saved is equal to zero? What is it that assures that the aggregate amount people wish to save is equal to zero?
    3. Wages are now made flexible. Describe the process of adjustment to a new equilibrium position. Does this new position involve unemployment? What is the equilibrium condition on saving? What forces operate to bring about the satisfaction of this condition?
    4. Discuss the factors that determine the rent of capital goods and the wages of labor at equilibrium when both are flexible.
    5. Lending and borrowing is [sic] now introduced, but all other assumptions are retained, so that all loans are in essence “consumption loans”. What determines the equilibrium rate of interest? What effect, if any, would the introduction of lending and borrowing have on the price level?

 

 

Final Examination
Economics 300B
June 12, 1951

  1. “The statement that wages tend to equal the net product of the worker’s labor… is not, as some have thought, an independent theory of wages, but only a particular way of wording the familiar doctrine that the value of everything tends to be equal to its expense of production.” (Marshall)
    1. Explain why “the statement that wages tend to equal the net product of the worker’s labor” is not “an independent [i.e., complete] theory of wages.”
    2. Prove that it is “only a particular way of wording the familiar doctrine…” in doing so, interpret “everything” to mean “final products,” not “labor.”
  2. (a) Discuss the meaning of “profits” in connection with the theory of distribution. Outline briefly “a” theory of “profits.”
    (b) A private enterprise economy is frequently described as motivated by the desire to maximize “profits.” Is the word “profits” in this statement used in the same sense as in the discussion under (a)? Explain any difference.
  3. “Rent is but the leading species of a large genus.” Discuss.
  4. The income of farmers from the sale of their products depends on the prices at which the products sell. The general level of agricultural prices, in turn, depends primarily on the income of the nonfarm population. But the income of the nonfarm population depends on the prices of nonfarm products which, in turn, depends partly on the income of farmers.
    This kind of analysis is often criticized as circular reasoning and hence is incapable of leading to any useful conclusions. Is this criticism valid? Explain your answer.
  5. Beef sold in rural New England is mostly purchased from Chicago. Yet it is said that the retail price of the better cuts of beef is substantially less than in Chicago for the same grade of meat. Assuming that this is in fact the case. How would you explain this phenomenon in strictly economic terms? (I.e., do not give the easy – and probably wrong – explanation of irrationality, gouging, or the like). How would you test the validity of your suggested explanation?
  6. Suppose that legislative hearings were to be held on the following (a) A national bill to make the minimum wage rate very regionally, so it would be lower in the South than in the North; (b) A bill in a particular state to make it legal for manufacturers to enforce a minimum retail price on their products (a so-called “fair-trade” law).
    Indicate what groups you would expect to be testifying for and against each bill, and why you would expect them to do so.

Source:  Hoover Institution Archives. Milton Friedman Papers, Box 76, Folder 10.

Image Source: Milton Friedman (undated). University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf1-06230, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.